pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06114 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Key Role of Charge Disproportionation in Monoclinic Semiconducting Fe₂PO₅, a Room-Temperature d-Wave Altermagnet Candidate

Zhen Zhang , Mohd Anas , Andrey Kutepov , Parashu Kharel , Vladimir Antropov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Fe2PO5charge disproportionationmonoclinic structured-wave altermagnetsemiconductorelectronic instabilityroom-temperature altermagnet
0
0 comments X

The pith

An electronic instability in the tetragonal metallic state of Fe₂PO₅ drives charge disproportionation that stabilizes the monoclinic semiconducting phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that β-Fe₂PO₅ develops its observed monoclinic crystal structure and narrow electronic gap through charge disproportionation between iron sites. This disproportionation arises from an instability that appears only when electron correlations are included and symmetry-breaking distortions are permitted in the calculations. The resulting energy lowering couples the electronic and structural degrees of freedom, turning the higher-symmetry metallic state into a semiconductor. A reader would care because the mechanism accounts for how this room-temperature d-wave altermagnet candidate achieves a useful semiconducting gap while retaining its large spin splitting and orthogonal spin channels.

Core claim

An electronic instability appears in the tetragonal metallic state as the joint effect of density functional theory and Hubbard U correction and results in a charge disproportionation, which in turn stabilizes the monoclinic distortion with narrow gap formation. The successful capture of this effect requires accounting for the relevant symmetry-breaking energy-lowering channels of charge disproportionation and structural distortion; otherwise tetragonal-symmetry-constrained calculations yield only a metallic state. Fe₂PO₅ is thus best described as a correlation- and hybridization-assisted, distortion-coupled, charge-disproportionated semiconductor and a rare room-temperature semiconducting d

What carries the argument

charge disproportionation between Fe sites that couples to monoclinic lattice distortion and opens the gap

If this is right

  • The monoclinic phase remains semiconducting with a narrow gap at room temperature.
  • Large band spin splitting and orthogonal transport channels for opposite spins survive the distortion.
  • The material provides a platform for studying coexistence of altermagnetism and charge density wave order in quasi-one-dimensional systems.
  • Symmetry-constrained calculations miss the ground state and incorrectly predict metallicity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar correlation-driven charge instabilities may turn other metallic altermagnet candidates into semiconductors once symmetry breaking is allowed.
  • Quasi-one-dimensional chain compounds with strong electron correlations could be screened for analogous distortion-coupled gaps.
  • Transport and magnetic measurements along the distinct crystallographic directions would test whether the altermagnetic spin splitting remains intact after the monoclinic distortion.

Load-bearing premise

The DFT+U treatment must be allowed to break symmetry through both charge disproportionation and structural relaxation; otherwise the calculation remains stuck in the tetragonal metallic state.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic or diffraction data that show no measurable charge difference between Fe sites together with metallic conductivity in the monoclinic phase would falsify the proposed instability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06114 by Andrey Kutepov, Mohd Anas, Parashu Kharel, Vladimir Antropov, Zhen Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Fundamental band gap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Band structures of the m-phase calculated with (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Magnonic band structure of the m-phase calcu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

$\beta$-Fe$_2$PO$_5$ is an emerging room-temperature d-wave altermagnet featuring quasi-one-dimensional crystal and magnetic structures, orthogonal transport channels for opposite spins, and large band spin splitting, which is a promising material for next-generation spintronics and magnonics. However, its crystal and electronic structures remain inconclusive. Here, joint experimental and theoretical studies confirm and explain the appearance of its monoclinic structure and semiconducting band gap. We discover that an electronic instability appears in the tetragonal metallic state as the joint effect of density functional theory and Hubbard U correction (DFT+U) and results in a charge disproportionation, which in turn stabilizes the monoclinic distortion with narrow gap formation. The successful capture of this effect within DFT+U requires accounting for the relevant symmetry-breaking energy-lowering channels -- charge disproportionation and structural distortion; otherwise, tetragonal-symmetry-constrained calculations yield only a metallic state. Fe$_2$PO$_5$ is thus best described as a correlation- and hybridization-assisted, distortion-coupled, charge-disproportionated semiconductor. It represents a rare room-temperature semiconducting d-wave altermagnet. It also provides a rare platform for studying the coexistence of altermagnetism and charge density wave in quasi-one-dimensional systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports joint experimental and theoretical work on β-Fe₂PO₅, confirming its monoclinic crystal structure and semiconducting gap. DFT+U calculations reveal an electronic instability in the tetragonal metallic phase that produces charge disproportionation; this disproportionation then stabilizes the monoclinic distortion and opens a narrow gap. The work emphasizes that symmetry-breaking channels (charge disproportionation plus structural relaxation) must be allowed, as tetragonal-constrained calculations remain metallic, and positions the compound as a rare room-temperature semiconducting d-wave altermagnet candidate.

Significance. If the computational results hold with full details provided, the paper identifies a rare room-temperature semiconducting d-wave altermagnet and supplies a concrete platform for examining the interplay of correlation-driven charge disproportionation, structural distortion, and altermagnetism in quasi-one-dimensional systems. The joint experimental confirmation of structure and gap adds value, though the absence of quantitative computational parameters limits immediate reproducibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Computational Methods] Computational details section (or equivalent): the specific Hubbard U value, its determination method (e.g., linear response or empirical), and any convergence tests are not reported. Because the central claim states that the charge-disproportionation instability appears only as the joint effect of DFT and the U correction, and that symmetry-constrained calculations remain metallic, the U parameter is load-bearing and must be stated explicitly with sensitivity checks.
  2. [Results] Results section and abstract: no numerical values are given for the computed or measured band gap, the magnitude of charge disproportionation (e.g., site-resolved Fe valences or Bader charges), or experimental error bars on lattice parameters and transport data. Without these, it is difficult to assess how narrow the gap is, how well theory matches experiment, or the robustness of the monoclinic stabilization claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'narrow gap formation' would benefit from a parenthetical numerical estimate (e.g., ~0.2 eV) to give readers an immediate sense of scale.
  2. [Figures] Figures: ensure all plots of density of states or band structures include the Fermi level reference and that any experimental spectra are overlaid with theory where direct comparison is claimed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and reproducibility of the work. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Computational Methods] Computational details section (or equivalent): the specific Hubbard U value, its determination method (e.g., linear response or empirical), and any convergence tests are not reported. Because the central claim states that the charge-disproportionation instability appears only as the joint effect of DFT and the U correction, and that symmetry-constrained calculations remain metallic, the U parameter is load-bearing and must be stated explicitly with sensitivity checks.

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of the Hubbard U parameter is essential given its central role in stabilizing the charge disproportionation. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the Computational Methods section to state the specific U value employed, the linear-response procedure used to determine it, and the results of convergence tests with respect to U and k-point sampling. These additions confirm that the electronic instability and subsequent monoclinic stabilization remain robust for U values near the chosen one. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section and abstract: no numerical values are given for the computed or measured band gap, the magnitude of charge disproportionation (e.g., site-resolved Fe valences or Bader charges), or experimental error bars on lattice parameters and transport data. Without these, it is difficult to assess how narrow the gap is, how well theory matches experiment, or the robustness of the monoclinic stabilization claim.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting the absence of quantitative values. We have revised both the Results section and the abstract to report the computed and measured band-gap magnitudes, the site-resolved Bader charges that quantify the charge disproportionation, and the experimental uncertainties on the lattice parameters and transport data. These additions allow direct assessment of the narrow-gap semiconducting state and the agreement between theory and experiment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on standard DFT+U calculations applied to the tetragonal phase, where allowing symmetry-breaking channels (charge disproportionation and structural relaxation) produces an instability leading to monoclinic distortion and gap opening, while symmetry-constrained runs remain metallic. This is a conventional computational protocol for correlation-driven instabilities and does not reduce any target quantity (gap, distortion) to a fitted parameter defined by the result itself. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes are presented that would make the outcome equivalent to its inputs by construction. The description is internally consistent with external benchmarks for DFT+U in mixed-valence compounds.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that DFT+U with symmetry breaking correctly captures the physics of this iron phosphate; no free parameters or new entities are introduced beyond the standard Hubbard U term.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DFT+U with appropriate symmetry breaking reproduces the ground-state structure and gap of transition-metal phosphates
    Invoked when the paper states that only symmetry-unconstrained DFT+U captures the instability.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1306 out tokens · 35934 ms · 2026-05-10T18:45:26.569341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Figure 1(d) shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern recorded at room temperature for theβ-Fe 2PO5 powder sample

    and the semiconducting nature [14] ofβ-Fe 2PO5, we have synthesized it (see Methods) and measured its elec- trical transport properties. Figure 1(d) shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern recorded at room temperature for theβ-Fe 2PO5 powder sample. The Rietveld analysis of the XRD pattern indicates thatβ-Fe 2PO5 crystallizes into a m-structure (space g...

  2. [2]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Ro- tation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031042 2022

  3. [3]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, 7 Emerging Research Landscape of Altermag- netism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.040501 2022

  4. [4]

    L. D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J. W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antifer- romagnets, Phys. Rev. B102, 014422 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.014422 2020

  5. [5]

    L. D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J. W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Prediction of low-Z collinear and noncollinear an- tiferromagnetic compounds having momentum- dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014409 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.014409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.5.014409 2021

  6. [6]

    K. H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K. W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 asd-wave Pomer- anchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B99, 184432 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184432

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.184432 2019

  7. [7]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in or- ganic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun.10, 4305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12229-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12229-y 2019

  8. [8]

    H. Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J. F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromag- netic materials with giant piezomagnetism and non- collinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23127-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23127-7 2021

  9. [9]

    S. V. Gallego, J. M. Perez-Mato, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, R. M. Hanson, K. Momma, M. I. Aroyo, and G. Madariaga, MAGNDATA: towards a database of magnetic struc- tures. I. The commensurate case, J. Appl. Cryst.49, 1750 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576716012863

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576716012863 2016

  10. [10]

    T. He, L. Li, C. Cui, R.-W. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, G. Liu, and X. Zhang, Quasi-One-Dimensional Spin Transport in AltermagneticZ 3 Nodal Net Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 146602 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.146602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.146602 2024

  11. [11]

    Sen Zhang et al., X-type stacking in cross- chain antiferromagnets, Newton1, 100068 (2025)

    S. Sen Zhang et al., X-type stacking in cross- chain antiferromagnets, Newton1, 100068 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newton.2025.100068

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100068 2025

  12. [12]

    Modaressi, A

    A. Modaressi, A. Courtois, R. Gerardin, B. Malaman, and C. Gleitzer, Fe2PO5, un phosphate de fer de valence mixte. Pr´ eparation et ´ etudes structurale, m¨ ossbauer et magn´ etique, J. Solid State Chem.40, 301 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(81)90396-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-4596(81)90396-0 1981

  13. [13]

    Ijjaali, B

    M. Ijjaali, B. Malaman, G. Venturini, C. Gleitzer, G. J. Long, and F. Grandjeam, A neutron diffrac- tion and Mossbauer effect study of the (FeO 2)n ferromagnetic sheets in antiferromagneticα- Fe2(PO4)O, J. Phys. Condens. Matter3, 9597 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/3/48/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/3/48/002 1991

  14. [14]

    J. K. Warner, A. K. Cheetham, D. E. Cox, and R. B. Von Dreele, Valence Contrast between Iron Sites inα- Fe2PO5: A Comparative Study by Magnetic Neutron and Resonant X-ray Powder Diffraction, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 6074 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00041a027

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00041a027 1992

  15. [15]

    Ech-Chahed, F

    B. Ech-Chahed, F. Jeannot, B. Malaman, and C. Gleitzer, Pr´ eparation et ´ etude d’une vari´ et´ e basse temp´ erature de l’oxyphosphate de fer de valence mixte βFe2(PO4)O et de NiCr(PO 4)O: Un cas d’´ echange ´ electronique rapide, J. Solid State Chem.74, 47 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(88)90330-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-4596(88)90330-1 1988

  16. [16]

    Ijjaali, B

    M. Ijjaali, B. Malaman, C. Gleitzer, J. K. Warner, J. A. Hriljac, and A. K. Cheetham, Stability, structure refinement, and magnetic properties ofβ- Fe2(PO4)O, J. Solid State Chem.86, 195 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(90)90135-K

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-4596(90)90135-k 1990

  17. [17]

    Elka¨ ım, J

    E. Elka¨ ım, J. F. Berar, C. Gleitzer, B. Malaman, M. Ijjaali, and C. Lecomte, Occurrence of a monoclinic distortion inβ-Fe 2PO5, Acta Cryst.B52, 428 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768195014273

    work page doi:10.1107/s0108768195014273 1996

  18. [18]

    See Supplemental Material for more computational and experimental details

  19. [19]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. X. Xiong, and A. Zunger, Hidden mag- netism and split off flat bands in the insulator metal transition in VO 2, Npj Comput. Mater.10, 217 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-024-01382-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01382-8 2024

  20. [20]

    J. P. Allen and G. W. Watson, Occupation matrix control of d- and f-electron localisations using DFT + U, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 21016 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP01083C

    work page doi:10.1039/c4cp01083c 2014

  21. [21]

    Note that the tiny unphysical band spin splitting along the nodal planes or lines in the charge-disproportionated band structure is due to numerical errors in symmetry- unconstrained calculations, which is negligible and can be reduced by increasing computational accuracy

  22. [22]

    I. I. Mazin, D. I. Khomskii, R. Lengsdorf, J. A. Alonso, W. G. Marshall, R. M. Ibberson, A. Podlesnyak, M. J. Mart´ ınez-Lope, and M. M. Abd- Elmeguid, Charge Ordering as Alternative to Jahn- Teller Distortion, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 176406 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.176406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.176406 2007

  23. [23]

    H. Park, A. J. Millis, and C. A. Marianetti, Site-Selective Mott Transition in Rare-Earth-Element Nickelates, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 156402 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.156402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.156402 2012

  24. [24]

    Varignon, M

    J. Varignon, M. Bibes, and A. Zunger, Origin of band gaps in 3dperovskite oxides, Nat. Commun.10, 1658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09698-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09698-6 2019

  25. [25]

    G. M. Dalpian, Q. Liu, J. Varignon, M. Bibes, and A. Zunger, Bond disproportionation, charge self-regulation, and ligand holes ins-pand in d-electronABX 3 perovskites by density func- tional theory, Phys. Rev. B98, 075135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075135

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.075135 2018

  26. [26]

    Jiang et al., A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nat

    B. Jiang et al., A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02822-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02822-y 2025

  27. [27]

    Zhang et al., Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic al- termagnet candidate, Nat

    F. Zhang et al., Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic al- termagnet candidate, Nat. Phys.21, 760 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02864-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02864-2 2025

  28. [28]

    Reichlova et al., Observation of a spontaneous anomalous Hall response in the Mn 5Si3 d-wave alter- magnet candidate, Nat

    H. Reichlova et al., Observation of a spontaneous anomalous Hall response in the Mn 5Si3 d-wave alter- magnet candidate, Nat. Commun.15, 4961 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48493-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48493-w 2024

  29. [29]

    Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity.Nature Commun., 14(1):7910, 2023

    A. Badura et al., Observation of the anomalous Nernst effect in altermagnetic candidate Mn 5Si3, Nat. Com- mun.16, 7111 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 025-62331-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467- 2025

  30. [30]

    Han et al., Electrical 180°switching of N´ eel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Sci

    L. Han et al., Electrical 180°switching of N´ eel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Sci. Adv.10, eadn0479 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn0479

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn0479 2024

  31. [31]

    Keßler et al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights fromµSR spectroscopy and neu- tron diffraction, Npj Spintronics2, 50 (2024)

    P. Keßler et al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights fromµSR spectroscopy and neu- tron diffraction, Npj Spintronics2, 50 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44306-024-00055-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s44306-024-00055-y 2024

  32. [32]

    Hiraishi, H

    M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono, 8 T. Muroi, D. Hirai, and Z. Hiroi, Nonmagnetic Ground State in RuO 2 Revealed by Muon Spin Rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 166702 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.166702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.166702 2024

  33. [33]

    Smolyanyuk, I

    A. Smolyanyuk, I. I. Mazin, L. Garcia-Gassull, and R. Valent´ ı, Fragility of the magnetic order in the prototypi- cal altermagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. B109, 134424 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.134424

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.134424 2024

  34. [34]

    T. He, X. Zhang, W. Meng, L. Jin, X. Dai, and G. Liu, Topological nodal lines and nodal points in the antifer- romagnetic materialβ-Fe 2PO5, J. Mater. Chem. C7, 12657 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC04046C

    work page doi:10.1039/c9tc04046c 2019

  35. [35]

    ˇSmejkal et al., Chiral Magnons in Altermag- netic RuO 2, Phys

    L. ˇSmejkal et al., Chiral Magnons in Altermag- netic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 256703 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.256703

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.256703 2023

  36. [36]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Ma- suda, Chiral Split Magnon in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 156702 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.156702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.156702 2024

  37. [37]

    Y. F. Zhang, X. S. Ni, K. Chen, and K. Cao, Chiral magnon splitting in altermagnetic CrSb from first principles, Phys. Rev. B111, 174451 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.174451

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.174451 2025

  38. [38]

    V. P. Kravchuk, K. V. Yershov, J. I. Facio, Y. Guo, O. Janson, O. Gomonay, J. Sinova, and J. van den Brink, Chiral magnetic excitations and domain textures ofg- wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, 144421 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/zn8d-ft9b

    work page doi:10.1103/zn8d-ft9b 2025

  39. [39]

    Zhang, E

    Z. Zhang, E. H. Gamage, G. Amobi, S. Pradhan, A. Kutepov, K. D. Belashchenko, Y. Sun, K. Kovnir, and V. Antropov, Discovery and Synthesis of a Family of Boride Altermagnets, J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 30117 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c07874

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.5c07874 2025

  40. [40]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzer- hof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  41. [41]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes forab initiototal-energy calculations using a plane- wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 1996

  42. [42]

    R. E. Prange and V. Korenman, Local-band the- ory of itinerant ferromagnetism. IV. Equivalent Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B19, 4691 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.19.4691

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.19.4691 1979

  43. [43]

    X. He, N. Helbig, M. J. Verstraete, and E. Bousquet, TB2J: A python package for computing magnetic interac- tion parameters, Comput. Phys. Commun.264, 107938 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107938

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107938 2021

  44. [44]

    Ozaki ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.155108 journal journal Phys

    T. Ozaki, Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures, Phys. Rev. B67, 155108 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.155108

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.155108 2003

  45. [45]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.57.1505 1998

  46. [46]

    QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open -source software project for quantum simulations of materials

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-Q incommensurate magnetic structures, J. Phys. Condens. Matter27, 166002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953- 8984/27/16/166002

    work page doi:10.1088/0953- 2015

  47. [47]

    Nelson, C

    R. Nelson, C. Ertural, J. George, V. L. Deringer, G. Hautier, and R. Dronskowski, LOBSTER: Local or- bital projections, atomic charges, and chemical-bonding analysis from projector-augmented-wave-based density- functional theory, J. Comput. Chem.41, 1931 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26353

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.26353 1931