pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06147 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

From generating functions to the geometric Binder cumulant

Bal\'azs Het\'enyi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords geometric phasesBargmann invariantBinder cumulantsquantum phase transitionsgenerating functionsgap closurefidelity susceptibilitylocalization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A generalized Bargmann invariant serves as a generating function whose cumulants form geometric Binder ratios sensitive to energy gap closures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper adapts the concept of generating functions from quantum mechanics to the geometric phase formalism. It extends adiabatic cycles to quasiadiabatic ones that encounter degeneracy points by introducing a generalized Bargmann invariant. From the moments and cumulants produced by this invariant, the authors construct Binder cumulant ratios. These ratios detect the closing of gaps between energy levels. The approach is tested on model systems with known localization behavior and compared against fidelity susceptibility to show its utility for locating metal-insulator transitions and quantum phase transitions.

Core claim

The generalized Bargmann invariant extends the original geometric phase formalism to quasiadiabatic cycles containing degeneracy points. It functions as a generating function from which cumulants are extracted and assembled into Binder ratios. These geometric Binder cumulants remain sensitive to gap closure and thereby locate metal-insulator transitions, localization, and quantum phase transitions in simple model systems.

What carries the argument

The generalized Bargmann invariant, which replaces the standard Bargmann invariant when degeneracy points appear along a quasiadiabatic cycle and generates the cumulants used to build Binder ratios.

If this is right

  • Geometric Binder cumulants locate metal-insulator transitions by detecting gap closures.
  • The same ratios identify localization transitions in quantum systems.
  • They provide an additional indicator for quantum phase transitions beyond standard geometric phases.
  • Results can be cross-checked against fidelity susceptibility on the same parameter spaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be applied to many-body systems with interactions to test whether Binder ratios still track gap closures amid strong correlations.
  • Extending the construction to higher-dimensional parameter manifolds might reveal geometric signatures of multicritical points.
  • The generating-function approach may link fluctuation measures in quantum geometry to classical statistical mechanics more directly than previously recognized.

Load-bearing premise

The cumulants obtained from the generalized Bargmann invariant retain their sensitivity to gap closure in the Binder ratios even when degeneracy points lie on the cycle.

What would settle it

A calculation on a model system with a known gap closure at a specific parameter value in which the geometric Binder cumulant remains smooth and nonsingular would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06147 by Bal\'azs Het\'enyi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Different scenarios of cyclic curves in a two-dimensi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Geometric Binder cumulant ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of different finite difference derivative s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Fidelity susceptibility, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an overview of the role of generating functions in quantum mechanical contexts, mainly in the modern theory of polarization and in the study of quantum phase transitions. Generating functions enable the derivation of moments and cumulants, quantities which characterize the fluctuations of an underlying probability distribution. In all of the cases we review, the fluctuations are those of a quantum system. We show that the original formalism for geometric phases, in which a quantum system is taken around an adiabatic cycle, can be extended to the case when degeneracy points are encountered along the cycle (quasiadiabatic cycles). The essential tool for this extension is a generalized Bargmann invariant which plays the role of a generating function. From the cumulants generated this way one can form ratios according to the Binder cumulant scheme in statistical mechanics. Such geometric Binder cumulants are sensitive to gap closure, as such, they are useful in identifying metal-insulator transitions, localization, and quantum phase transitions. We present example calculations on simple model systems, whose localization properties are well known, to validate to approach. We also complement our geometric Binder cumulant calculations with results for the fidelity susceptibility, a quantity directly related to the quantum geometry of the parameter space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the role of generating functions in quantum mechanics, focusing on the modern theory of polarization and quantum phase transitions. It extends the geometric phase formalism to quasiadiabatic cycles (including degeneracy points) by introducing a generalized Bargmann invariant that serves as a generating function. Cumulants extracted from this invariant are combined into Binder-style ratios, which the authors claim are sensitive to gap closure and therefore useful for identifying metal-insulator transitions, localization phenomena, and quantum phase transitions. The approach is illustrated with explicit calculations on simple model systems of known localization properties and is compared against fidelity susceptibility.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a geometrically motivated diagnostic for gap-closing transitions that builds directly on established generating-function techniques and the theory of geometric phases. The manuscript earns credit for its explicit extension of the Bargmann invariant to quasiadiabatic cycles and for the concrete model calculations that link the new cumulants to fidelity susceptibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Numerical validation on model systems): The reported calculations for the geometric Binder cumulants are performed at fixed, small system sizes without any explicit variation of system size (e.g., chain length) or demonstration of size-independent crossings at the known gap-closure points. This omission removes the finite-size diagnostic property that makes conventional Binder cumulants practically useful for locating transitions, leaving the sensitivity claim dependent on post-hoc agreement with known cases rather than on the scaling behavior required by the central analogy.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Formation of geometric Binder cumulants): The statement that the cumulants derived from the generalized Bargmann invariant remain diagnostically sensitive to gap closure even when degeneracy points lie on the cycle is asserted but not accompanied by an analytic argument or a controlled numerical test showing that the Binder ratio retains its characteristic behavior under controlled degeneracy; the present validation therefore does not yet establish that the construction is robust for the quasiadiabatic regime emphasized in the abstract.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and §1 would benefit from a single sentence stating the concrete models (e.g., SSH chain, Rice-Mele) and the range of system sizes actually used, so that readers can immediately gauge the scope of the numerical evidence.
  2. [§4] In the figures of §4, the panels comparing geometric Binder cumulants to fidelity susceptibility lack a common horizontal axis scale or explicit indication of the parameter values at which gap closure occurs, making direct visual comparison unnecessarily difficult.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We respond to the major comments point by point below, proposing revisions to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Numerical validation on model systems): The reported calculations for the geometric Binder cumulants are performed at fixed, small system sizes without any explicit variation of system size (e.g., chain length) or demonstration of size-independent crossings at the known gap-closure points. This omission removes the finite-size diagnostic property that makes conventional Binder cumulants practically useful for locating transitions, leaving the sensitivity claim dependent on post-hoc agreement with known cases rather than on the scaling behavior required by the central analogy.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation regarding the importance of finite-size scaling in Binder cumulant analyses. The manuscript primarily aims to introduce the geometric Binder cumulant concept and validate it through explicit calculations on small model systems with well-known localization properties. However, to better align with the conventional use of Binder cumulants for locating transitions via size-independent crossings, we will incorporate additional calculations varying the system size (e.g., chain length) in the revised manuscript. This will demonstrate the scaling behavior and crossings at the gap-closure points. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Formation of geometric Binder cumulants): The statement that the cumulants derived from the generalized Bargmann invariant remain diagnostically sensitive to gap closure even when degeneracy points lie on the cycle is asserted but not accompanied by an analytic argument or a controlled numerical test showing that the Binder ratio retains its characteristic behavior under controlled degeneracy; the present validation therefore does not yet establish that the construction is robust for the quasiadiabatic regime emphasized in the abstract.

    Authors: The generalized Bargmann invariant is formulated to extend the geometric phase formalism to quasiadiabatic cycles that may include degeneracy points, as explained in Section 3.2. While the numerical examples in the manuscript support the sensitivity to gap closure, we agree that a more controlled demonstration would strengthen the claim. In the revised version, we will include an analytic argument where possible and a dedicated numerical test with controlled degeneracy points to verify that the Binder ratio maintains its diagnostic behavior in the quasiadiabatic regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation extends geometric phases via generalized Bargmann invariant to Binder ratios without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's chain starts from established generating-function concepts in polarization and geometric phases, introduces a generalized Bargmann invariant to handle quasiadiabatic cycles with degeneracies, derives cumulants from it, and forms Binder-style ratios. These steps are presented as direct extensions with explicit example calculations on models of known localization properties, cross-checked against fidelity susceptibility. No equation or claim reduces the sensitivity-to-gap-closure assertion to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation whose validity is assumed rather than independently supported. The construction remains self-contained against external benchmarks in quantum geometry and statistical mechanics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central construction appears to rest on standard quantum-mechanical generating functions and the definition of the generalized Bargmann invariant.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1051 out tokens · 32310 ms · 2026-05-10T18:45:29.580236+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The open path Berry phase (Zak phase) 8

  2. [2]

    The generating function in quantum geometry 10 III

    The single point Berry phase 9 E. The generating function in quantum geometry 10 III. Generating functions in crystalline systems 10 A. Periodic probability distributions 10 B. The modern polarization theory for crystalline many-body syste ms 12 C. Gauge invariant cumulants 13 D. Generating functions for the Berry phase 13 E. Constructing the geometric Bi...

  3. [3]

    The vector space in which ξ lives is assumed to be finite dimensional

    The Berry phase Consider a quantum system whose Hamiltonian, H(ξ), depends on a set of parameters denoted by vector, ξ. The vector space in which ξ lives is assumed to be finite dimensional. We also assume that the norma lized ground state wavefunction, |Ψ 0(ξ)⟩, satisfying, H(ξ)|Ψ 0(ξ)⟩ = E0(ξ)|Ψ 0(ξ)⟩, (17) is known for some region of the parameter space...

  4. [4]

    We consider a sequence, ξ1, ..., ξ M

    The open path Berry phase (Zak phase) It was first found by Zak that a physically well-defined quantity similar to the Berry phase can be constructed for open paths too, provided that the endpoints are connected by a s ymmetry operation. We consider a sequence, ξ1, ..., ξ M . Let there be a symmetry relation, denoted by the operator ˆS, between the ground s...

  5. [5]

    The wavefunction is only needed at a single point in parameter space, we c an simply denote it |Ψ ⟩ γ = Im log⟨Ψ |ˆU |Ψ ⟩

    The single point Berry phase The single point Berry phase is simply the phase of the expectation va lue of some unitary operator, ˆU . The wavefunction is only needed at a single point in parameter space, we c an simply denote it |Ψ ⟩ γ = Im log⟨Ψ |ˆU |Ψ ⟩. (33) γ is defined up to modulo 2 π . An example of a single point Berry phase was introduced by Rest...

    2090

  6. [6]

    Now consider all the fillings at some system size, L = Fn

    The larger s is, the better Fm/F n approximates the irrational number α (m, n ). Now consider all the fillings at some system size, L = Fn. All densities, N/L ,can be written according to the Zeckendorf decomposition (Eq. (78)). We can write an irrational n umber, ˜α (N, L ), corresponding to any density, N/L , as, ˜α (N, L ) = lim s→∞ ∑M m=1 FIm(N )+s Fn+...

  7. [7]

    61803398875

    = 0 . 61803398875...... . The worst approximation (if approximation is restricted to ratios of Fibonacci numbers) for this number is F1/F 2, which is unity. One filling we will study is N/L = 377/ 610, which is F14/F 15 = 0. 61803278688... , which is in agreement with its infinite limit irrational number up to 5 significant digits. The numb er F14/F 15 is a ...

    2017

  8. [8]

    Lukacs, ”Characteristic Functions”, Charles Griffin a nd Company, London, (1960)

    E. Lukacs, ”Characteristic Functions”, Charles Griffin a nd Company, London, (1960)

    1960

  9. [9]

    Kubo, ”Generalized Cumulant Expansion Method” J

    R. Kubo, ”Generalized Cumulant Expansion Method” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 17 1100 (1962)

    1962

  10. [10]

    Fulde, ”Electron Correlation in Molecules and Solids ”, Springer, Berlin, (1995)

    P. Fulde, ”Electron Correlation in Molecules and Solids ”, Springer, Berlin, (1995)

    1995

  11. [11]

    Pancharatnam, ”Generalized Theory of Interference, and Its Applications

    S. Pancharatnam, ”Generalized Theory of Interference, and Its Applications. Part I. Coherent Pencils”, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A 44 247 (1956)

    1956

  12. [12]

    H. C. Longuet-Higgins, U. ¨Opik, M. H. L. Pryce, and R. A. Sack, ”Studies of the Jahn-Tell er effect .II. The dynamical problem”. Proc. R. Soc. A. 244 1 (1958)

    1958

  13. [13]

    M. V. Berry, ”Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiaba tic Changes”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 392 45 (1984)

    1984

  14. [14]

    Wilczek and A

    F. Wilczek and A. Shapere, A., eds. ”Geometric Phases in P hysics”, World Scientific, Singapore (1989)

    1989

  15. [15]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, ”Berry phase effects on el ectronic properties”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1959 (2010)

    1959

  16. [16]

    Kato, ”On the Adiabatic Theorem of Quantum Mechanics” , J

    T. Kato, ”On the Adiabatic Theorem of Quantum Mechanics” , J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 5 435 (1950)

    1950

  17. [17]

    Zak, ”Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids”, Phys

    J. Zak, ”Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 2747 (1989)

    1989

  18. [18]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, ”Theory of polariza tion in crystalline solids”, Phys. Rev. B 47 R1651 (1993)

    1993

  19. [19]

    Resta, ”Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di electrics: the geometric phase approach”, Rev

    R. Resta, ”Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di electrics: the geometric phase approach”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66 899 (1994)

    1994

  20. [20]

    Resta, ”Quantum Mechanical Position Operator in Ext ended Systems”, Phys

    R. Resta, ”Quantum Mechanical Position Operator in Ext ended Systems”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 1800 (1998)

    1998

  21. [21]

    Resta and S

    R. Resta and S. Sorella, ”Electron Localization in the I nsulating State”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 370 (1999)

    1999

  22. [22]

    A. A. Aligia and G. Ortiz, ”Quantum Mechanical Position Operator and Localization in Extended Systems”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2560 (1999)

    1999

  23. [23]

    Ortiz and A

    G. Ortiz and A. A. Aligia, ”How Localized is an Extended Q uantum System?”, Phys. Stat. Solidi B 220 737 (2000)

    2000

  24. [24]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, ”Polarization an d localization in insulators: Generating function approac h”,Phys. Rev. B 62 1666 (2000)

    2000

  25. [25]

    Resta, ”The insulating state of matter: a geometrica l theory”, J

    R. Resta, ”The insulating state of matter: a geometrica l theory”, J. Phys.: Cond. Mat. 12 R107 (2000)

    2000

  26. [26]

    Resta and D

    R. Resta and D. Vanderbilt, ”Theory of polarization: a m odern approach”, in ”Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective”, eds. K. M. Raabe, C.-H. Ahn, and J.-M. Triscon e, Springer Series in Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 105, Spriger Berlin Heidelberg (2007)

    2007

  27. [27]

    Resta, ”Electrical polarization and orbital magnet ization: the modern theories”, J

    R. Resta, ”Electrical polarization and orbital magnet ization: the modern theories”, J. Phys.: Cond. Mat. 22 123201 (2012)

    2012

  28. [28]

    N. A. Spaldin, ”A beginner’s guide to the modern theory o f polarization” J. Solid State Chem. 195 2 (2012)

    2012

  29. [29]

    Vanderbilt, Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K

    D. Vanderbilt, Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2018)

    2018

  30. [30]

    Grosso and G

    G. Grosso and G. Pastori Parravicini, ”Solid State Phys ics”, Academic Press, London (2000)

    2000

  31. [31]

    Resta, ”Berry phase and geometrical observables”, E lsevier, (2024)

    R. Resta, ”Berry phase and geometrical observables”, E lsevier, (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    J. L. Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics , Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics, Cambridge University Press (1996)

    1996

  33. [33]

    Binder, ”Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block distribution functions”, Z

    K. Binder, ”Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block distribution functions”, Z. Phys. B 43 119 (1981)

    1981

  34. [34]

    Binder, ”Critical Properties from Monte Carlo Coars e Graining and Renormalization”, Phys

    K. Binder, ”Critical Properties from Monte Carlo Coars e Graining and Renormalization”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 693 (1981)

    1981

  35. [35]

    M. E. Fisher, in Critical Phenomena , Proc. 51st Enrico Fermi Summer School, Varena, edited by M. S. Green (Academic Press, N.Y.) 1972

    1972

  36. [36]

    M. E. Fisher and M. N. Barber, ”Scaling Theory for Finite -Size Effects in the Critical Region”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 1516 (1972)

    1972

  37. [37]

    Kohn, ”Theory of the Insulating State”, Phys

    W. Kohn, ”Theory of the Insulating State”, Phys. Rev. 133 A171 (1964)

    1964

  38. [38]

    B. A. Bernevig and T. L. Hughes, Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Princeton University Press (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators: Band Structure an d Edge States in One and Two Dimensions , Lecture Notes on Physica, vol. 919, Springer Internationa l Publishing, (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, ”Topological insulators and s uperconductors”, Reviews of Modern Physics , 83 1057 (2011)

    2011

  41. [41]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, ”Topological superconductors: a re view”, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 076501 (2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    T¨ orm¨ a, ”Essay: Where Can Quantum Geometry Lead Us?” Phys

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, ”Essay: Where Can Quantum Geometry Lead Us?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 240001 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Riemannian structure on mani folds of quantum states,

    J. Provost and G. Vallee, “Riemannian structure on mani folds of quantum states,” Comm. Math. Phys. 76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  44. [44]

    Het´ enyi and P

    B. Het´ enyi and P. L´ evay, ”Fluctuations, uncertaintyrelations, and the geometry of quantum state manifolds”, Phys. Rev. A 108 032218 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, ”Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands” , Nat. Comm. 6 8944 (2015). 24

    2015

  46. [46]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a an d B.-J. Yang, ”Quantum geometry in quantum materials” npj Quantum Mater. 10 101 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    J. J. P. Thompson, W. J. Jankowski, R.-J. Slager, B. Mons errat, ”Topologically enhanced exciton transport” Nat Commun 16, 11448 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Y. Xie, R. Liu, and B. Gu, ”Quantum geometrical molecula r dynamics”, Sci. Adv. 11 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, ”Instantaneous response and qu antum geometry of insulators” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 122 e2405837122 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Pellitteri, Z

    G. Pellitteri, Z. Dai, H. Hu, Y. Jiang, G. Menichetti, A. Tomadin, B. A. Bernevig, and M. Polini, ”Phonon spectra, quantum geometry, and the Goldstone theorem”, Phys. Rev. B 112 245128 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    A .Avdoshkin and F. K. Popov, ”Extrinsic geometry of qua ntum states” Phys. Rev. B 107 245136 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    Avdoshkin, J

    A. Avdoshkin, J. Mitscherling, J. E. Moore, ”Multistat e geometry of shift current and polarization” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 066901 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Gu, ”Fidelity Approach to Quantum Phase Transiti ons”, Int

    S.-J. Gu, ”Fidelity Approach to Quantum Phase Transiti ons”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 24 4371 (2010)

    2010

  54. [54]

    Sachdev, ”Quantum Phase Transitions”, 2nd ed., Camb ridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (2011)

    S. Sachdev, ”Quantum Phase Transitions”, 2nd ed., Camb ridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (2011)

    2011

  55. [55]

    Bargmann, ”Note on Wigner’s Theorem on Symmetry Oper ations ”, J

    V. Bargmann, ”Note on Wigner’s Theorem on Symmetry Oper ations ”, J. Math. Phys. 5 862 (1964)

    1964

  56. [56]

    Het´ enyi and B

    B. Het´ enyi and B. D´ ora, ”Quantum phase transitions from analysis of the polarization amplitude”, Phys. Rev. B 99 085126 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    Het´ enyi and S

    B. Het´ enyi and S. Cengiz, ”Geometric cumulants associ ated with adiabatic cycles crossing degeneracy points: App lication to finite size scaling of metal-insulator transitions in cry stalline electronic systems”, Phys. Rev. B 106 195151 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, ”Solitons in p olyacetylene”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  59. [59]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, ”Analyticity breaking and Ander son localization in incommensurate lattices”, Ann. Isr. Phys. 3 133 (1980)

    1980

  60. [60]

    A. J. Martinez, M. A. Porter, and P. T. Kevrekidis, ”Quas iperiodic granular chains and Hofstadter butterflies”, Philos. Trans. A 376 20170139 (2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V. Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. L ogan, D. Cl´ ement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, ” Direct observation of Anderson localization of ma tter waves in a controlled disorder”, Nature (London) 453 891 (2008)

    2008

  62. [62]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M . Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, ”Anders on localization of a non-interacting Bose–Einstein condensa te”, Nature (London) 453 895 (2008)

    2008

  63. [63]

    G. A. Dominguez-Castro, R. Paredes, ”The Aubry–Andr´ e model as a hobbyhorse for understanding the localization phenomenon”, Eur. J. Phys. 40 045403 (2019)

    2019

  64. [64]

    S. Ya. Jitomirskaya, ”Metal-insulator transition for the almost Mathieu operator”, Ann. Math. 150 1159 (1999)

    1999

  65. [65]

    Avila, S

    A. Avila, S. Jitomirskaya, ”Solving the Ten Martini Pro blem” In: J. Asch, A. Joye, (eds) Mathematical Physics of Quantum Mechanics, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 690. Springer, Berlin, Heide lberg

  66. [66]

    Avila and S

    A. Avila and S. Jitomirskaya ”The Ten Martini Problem” Ann. Math. 170 303 (2009)

    2009

  67. [67]

    Avila, J

    A. Avila, J. You, and Q. Zhou, ”Dry Ten Martini Problem in the non-critical case” arxiv:2306.16254

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Modugno, ”Exponential localization in one-dimensi onal quasi-periodic optical lattices”, New

    M. Modugno, ”Exponential localization in one-dimensi onal quasi-periodic optical lattices”, New. J. Phys. 11 033023 (2009)

    2009

  69. [69]

    Y. Wang, G. Xianlong, and S. Chen, ”Almost mobility edge s and the existence of critical regions in one-dimensional quasiperiodic lattices”, Eur. Phys. J. B 90 215 (2017)

    2017

  70. [70]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. Bulmash, A. V. Maharaj, C.-M. Jian, and S. A. Kivelson, ”The almost mobility edge in the almost Mathieu equation ”, arXiv:1504.05205

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Mastropietro, ”Localization of Interacting Fermio ns in the Aubry-Andr´ e Model” Phys

    V. Mastropietro, ”Localization of Interacting Fermio ns in the Aubry-Andr´ e Model” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 180401 (2015)

    2015

  72. [72]

    S. Xu, X. Li, Y.-T. Hsu, B. Swingle, S. Das Sarma, ”Butter fly effect in interacting Aubry-Andre model: Thermalization , slow scrambling, and many-body localization”, Phys. Rev. Research 1 032039(R) (2019)

    2019

  73. [73]

    Cookmeyer, J

    T. Cookmeyer, J. Motruk, J. E. Moore, ”Critical propert ies of the ground-state localization-delocalization tran sition in the many-particle Aubry-Andr´ e model”,Phys. Rev. B 101174203 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    Huang, D

    K. Huang, D. Vu, S. Das Sarma, X. Li, ”Interaction-enhan ced many body localization in a generalized Aubry-Andre model” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022054 (2024)

    2024

  75. [75]

    Kerala Varma and S

    V. Kerala Varma and S. Pilati, ”Kohn’s localization in d isordered fermionic systems with and without interactions ” Phys. Rev. B 92 134207 (2015)

    2015

  76. [76]

    Het´ enyi, ”Scaling of the bulk polarization in exten ded and localized phases of a quasiperiodic model”, Phys

    B. Het´ enyi, ”Scaling of the bulk polarization in exten ded and localized phases of a quasiperiodic model”, Phys. Rev. B 110 125124 (2024)

    2024

  77. [77]

    Het´ enyi and I

    B. Het´ enyi and I. Balogh, ”Numerical study of the local ization transition of Aubry-Andr´ e type models” Phys. Rev. B 112 144203 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    F. Lu, A. Zhou, S. Cheng, and G. Xianlong, ”Wigner distri bution, Wigner entropy, and anomalous transport of a genera lized Aubry-Andr´ e model”Phys. Rev. B 112 174206 (2025)

    2025

  79. [79]

    Goswami, P

    A. Goswami, P. Chatterjee, R. Modak, and S. Sahoo, ”Subs ystem localization in a two-leg ladder system” Phys. Rev. B 112 144205 (2025)

    2025

  80. [80]

    Zhang, H.-C

    Z.-H. Zhang, H.-C. Kou, and P. Li, ”Critical dynamics an d its interferometry in the one-dimensional p-wave-paired Aubry- Andr´ e-Harper model”,Phys. Rev. B 112 014310 (2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.