pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06288 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-ph · gr-qc· quant-ph

Experimental predictions of the E₈ times ω E₈ octonionic unification program : A falsification-oriented catalogue for quantum foundations, particle physics, gravitation, and cosmology

Tejinder P. Singh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph gr-qcquant-ph
keywords octonionic unificationE8 symmetryobjective quantum collapsefermion mass relationsdark electromagnetismMajorana neutrinospre-gravitational gauge sectorfalsification catalogue
0
0 comments X

The pith

The E8 × ωE8 octonionic program generates specific experimental predictions for objective quantum collapse and particle mass relations from a single algebraic structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper assembles and classifies the experimentally testable claims made by the E8 × ωE8 octonionic unification program, providing a pedagogical map that connects its core algebraic ingredients to concrete observables. It argues that quantum foundations predictions such as objective spontaneous collapse and particle-physics predictions such as particular fermion mass ratios both emerge from the same octonionic and Jordan-algebra structure. A sympathetic reader would care because this breadth creates a unified target for experiment: if the predictions hold, the framework links quantum theory without external time to an extended gauge sector and flavor structure; if they fail, the entire synthesis is challenged at once.

Core claim

The E8 × ωE8 octonionic program predicts objective spontaneous collapse, operator time, loss of temporal interference above attosecond scales, a right-handed pre-gravitational gauge sector, dark electromagnetism with its dark photon, three inert right-handed Majorana neutrinos, Majorana light neutrinos, a maximal leptonic Dirac phase, CKM root-sum rules, charged-fermion mass relations including the first-generation 1:4:9 pattern and m_τ/m_μ = m_s/m_d, a low-energy fine-structure constant, a weak-mixing-angle derivation, and the mixed-regime relation α_s(M_Z)/α_em(0)=16, all derived from its core structure.

What carries the argument

The core octonionic and Jordan-algebra structure of the E8 × ωE8 program that is claimed to generate both the quantum collapse predictions and the particle-physics observables.

Load-bearing premise

All the listed predictions are logically derived from the single core octonionic and Jordan-algebra structure rather than assembled as separate conjectures.

What would settle it

A precision measurement showing that the tau-to-muon mass ratio is not equal to the strange-to-down quark mass ratio, or the absence of a dark photon at the predicted coupling strength, would falsify the corresponding claims.

read the original abstract

The $E_8 \times \omega E_8$ octonionic program aims at a deliberately ambitious synthesis: quantum theory without external classical time, objective collapse, emergent classical space-time, exceptional Jordan-algebra flavor structure, and an exceptional-group unification of visible matter with a right-handed pre-gravitational sector. The purpose of the present paper is not to review the whole formalism, but to assemble in one place the claims that are experimentally vulnerable and to classify them by logical strength. We begin with a cold-start pedagogical map from the core ingredients of the program to the observables it claims to generate. This map matters because the program's breadth is both its attraction and its principal vulnerability: if the particle-physics, gravitation, and quantum-foundational claims are not visibly derived from the same structure, the framework reduces to a collection of disconnected conjectures. On the quantum-foundational side the program predicts objective spontaneous collapse, operator time, spontaneous collapse in time, loss of temporal interference above an attosecond-scale separation, a six-dimensional explanation of apparent nonlocality, possible Bell correlations beyond the Tsirelson bound, a fermion-only collapse sector, and holographic or Karolyhazy-type space-time uncertainty. In particle physics it predicts a right-handed pre-gravitational gauge sector, an extended Higgs sector, dark electromagnetism and its dark photon, three inert right-handed Majorana neutrinos, Majorana light neutrinos, a maximal leptonic Dirac phase, CKM root-sum rules, charged-fermion mass relations including the first-generation $1{:}4{:}9$ pattern and the relation $m_\tau/m_\mu = m_s/m_d$, a low-energy fine-structure constant, a weak-mixing-angle derivation, and the mixed-regime relation $\alpha_s(M_Z)/\alpha_{em}(0)=16$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript compiles a catalogue of experimentally testable predictions from the E_8 × ωE_8 octonionic unification program. It includes quantum-foundational claims (objective spontaneous collapse, operator time, loss of temporal interference above attosecond scales, possible Bell correlations beyond the Tsirelson bound) and particle-physics claims (right-handed pre-gravitational gauge sector, dark electromagnetism, three inert right-handed Majorana neutrinos, first-generation 1:4:9 charged-fermion mass pattern, the relation m_τ/m_μ = m_s/m_d, and the mixed-regime coupling ratio α_s(M_Z)/α_em(0)=16). A cold-start pedagogical map from core octonionic and exceptional Jordan-algebra ingredients to observables is provided, with claims classified by logical strength.

Significance. If the listed predictions are shown to follow deductively and parameter-free from the single E_8 × ωE_8 octonionic/Jordan structure, the catalogue would constitute a useful, falsification-oriented resource for an ambitious unification framework. The paper's explicit recognition that its breadth creates a vulnerability to appearing as disconnected conjectures is a constructive feature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the enumerated observables are predictions generated by the core formalism is not accompanied by explicit derivations or cross-references; the abstract itself flags this as the principal vulnerability, yet the manuscript does not resolve it by exhibiting algebraic steps for, e.g., the 1:4:9 mass pattern or α_s(M_Z)/α_em(0)=16.
  2. [Pedagogical map] Pedagogical map section: the map lists correspondences between core ingredients (octonions, exceptional Jordan algebra, operator time) and observables but supplies no step-by-step extraction (e.g., from the algebra to the first-generation mass ratios or the mixed-regime coupling relation), leaving the deductive status of the predictions unverified within the present text.
  3. [Classification of claims] Classification of claims by logical strength: this classification presupposes that all predictions derive from the same E_8 × ωE_8 structure without additional parameters, but no equations, operator definitions, or prior references are supplied to demonstrate this for the right-handed gauge sector or the neutrino sector, rendering the classification unsupported in the manuscript.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The notation ωE_8 is used without an immediate parenthetical definition or reference to its precise algebraic role.
  2. [Particle-physics predictions] Several quantitative predictions (mass ratios, coupling values) are stated without accompanying uncertainty estimates or sensitivity to the single free parameter (collapse time scale) mentioned in the program.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The manuscript is conceived as a compact, falsification-oriented catalogue of predictions rather than a self-contained derivation of the underlying E_8 × ωE_8 formalism. We will strengthen cross-references and brief indications of logical provenance while preserving the paper's scope and readability. Point-by-point responses to the major comments follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the enumerated observables are predictions generated by the core formalism is not accompanied by explicit derivations or cross-references; the abstract itself flags this as the principal vulnerability, yet the manuscript does not resolve it by exhibiting algebraic steps for, e.g., the 1:4:9 mass pattern or α_s(M_Z)/α_em(0)=16.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit signposting. The enumerated observables are drawn from the program's existing literature; the present work collects and classifies them. In revision we will amend the abstract to include targeted citations to the prior papers that contain the algebraic derivations of the first-generation 1:4:9 mass pattern (from the exceptional Jordan algebra) and the mixed-regime coupling ratio α_s(M_Z)/α_em(0)=16. This will make the deductive provenance transparent without altering the catalogue character of the manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Pedagogical map] Pedagogical map section: the map lists correspondences between core ingredients (octonions, exceptional Jordan algebra, operator time) and observables but supplies no step-by-step extraction (e.g., from the algebra to the first-generation mass ratios or the mixed-regime coupling relation), leaving the deductive status of the predictions unverified within the present text.

    Authors: The pedagogical map is intentionally an overview that links core algebraic ingredients to observables while avoiding duplication of lengthy technical derivations. We accept that this leaves the explicit extraction steps implicit. We will expand the map with concise parenthetical indications of the principal algebraic steps for the cited examples and append the corresponding references to the detailed operator constructions and Jordan-algebraic calculations in our earlier works. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Classification of claims] Classification of claims by logical strength: this classification presupposes that all predictions derive from the same E_8 × ωE_8 structure without additional parameters, but no equations, operator definitions, or prior references are supplied to demonstrate this for the right-handed gauge sector or the neutrino sector, rendering the classification unsupported in the manuscript.

    Authors: The classification rests on the claim, established in the foundational literature, that the right-handed pre-gravitational gauge sector and the three inert right-handed Majorana neutrinos emerge parameter-free from the single E_8 × ωE_8 octonionic/Jordan structure. To render this explicit, we will add a short supporting subsection (or appendix table) that lists the relevant equations, operator definitions, and precise citations for these sectors. This addition will substantiate the classification without converting the paper into a full technical review. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified; paper is a catalogue of claims without exhibited derivations

full rationale

The provided manuscript text consists of an abstract and description of a pedagogical map that lists experimental predictions (objective collapse, right-handed gauge sector, mass relations such as 1:4:9 and m_τ/m_μ = m_s/m_d, coupling ratio α_s(M_Z)/α_em(0)=16, etc.) claimed to arise from the E8 × ωE8 octonionic/Jordan structure. No specific equations, derivation steps, or parameter-fitting procedures are quoted or shown in the text. The paper explicitly flags the vulnerability that claims must be visibly derived from the core structure rather than assembled as conjectures, but it does not perform or exhibit any such derivations here. Because no load-bearing step reduces by construction to an input (no self-definitional definitions, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-citation chains invoked to force uniqueness within this document), the circularity score is 0. The paper's value as a falsification catalogue stands or falls on external verification of the referenced formalism, but that does not constitute circularity in the present work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 3 invented entities

The program rests on several domain assumptions about the nature of quantum theory, collapse, and unification using octonions and exceptional groups. Many predictions involve specific numerical relations that may function as free parameters or fitted quantities. Since only the abstract is available, this ledger is incomplete and based solely on the listed claims.

free parameters (1)
  • collapse time scale
    The prediction of loss of temporal interference above an attosecond-scale separation suggests a fitted or chosen scale for the collapse process.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Quantum theory without external classical time
    Core ingredient of the program as stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Objective spontaneous collapse
    Predicted and assumed in the quantum-foundational side.
  • domain assumption Exceptional Jordan-algebra flavor structure
    Part of the synthesis described.
  • domain assumption E8 × ωE8 unification of visible matter with right-handed pre-gravitational sector
    The unification program relies on this group structure.
invented entities (3)
  • right-handed pre-gravitational gauge sector no independent evidence
    purpose: To unify gravity with matter in the E8 framework
    Introduced as part of the unification, no independent evidence provided in abstract.
  • dark photon no independent evidence
    purpose: Dark electromagnetism
    Predicted in particle physics sector.
  • three inert right-handed Majorana neutrinos no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for neutrino masses and dark sector
    Specific prediction without external support mentioned.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5662 in / 1938 out tokens · 105529 ms · 2026-05-10T19:41:44.393183+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum theory and the structure of space-time,

    T. P. Singh, “Quantum theory and the structure of space-time,”Z. Naturforsch. A73, 733 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Space and time as a consequence of GRW quantum jumps,

    T. P. Singh, “Space and time as a consequence of GRW quantum jumps,”Z. Naturforsch. A73, 923 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Space-time from collapse of the wave-function,

    T. P. Singh, “Space-time from collapse of the wave-function,”Z. Naturforsch. A74, 147 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    S. L. Adler,Quantum Theory as an Emergent Phenomenon(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Quantum theory without classical time: octonions, and a theoretical derivation of the fine structure constant 1/137,

    T. P. Singh, “Quantum theory without classical time: octonions, and a theoretical derivation of the fine structure constant 1/137,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30, 2142010 (2021). 16

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Quantum gravity effects in the infrared: a theoretical derivation of the low- energy fine structure constant and mass ratios of elementary particles,

    T. P. Singh, “Quantum gravity effects in the infrared: a theoretical derivation of the low- energy fine structure constant and mass ratios of elementary particles,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137(2022) no.6, 664 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02868-4 [arXiv:2205.06614 [physics.gen- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02868-4 2022

  7. [7]

    AnE8×E8 unification of the standard model with pre-gravitation, on an exceptional Lie algebra-valued space,

    P. Kaushik, V. Vaibhav, and T. P. Singh, “AnE8×E8 unification of the standard model with pre-gravitation, on an exceptional Lie algebra-valued space,” arXiv:2206.06911 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Spacetime and internal symmetry from split bioctonions and the two extra SU(3)’s ofE8×E8,

    T. P. Singh, “Spacetime and internal symmetry from split bioctonions and the two extra SU(3)’s ofE8×E8,” Preprints2025, 2025100437 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Gravitation, and quantum theory, as emergent phenomena,

    T. P. Singh, “Gravitation, and quantum theory, as emergent phenomena,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2533(2023) no.1, 012013 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2533/1/012013 [arXiv:2308.16216 [physics.gen-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2533/1/012013 2023

  10. [10]

    A violation of the Tsirelson bound in the pre-quantum theory of trace dynamics,

    R. G. Ahmed and T. P. Singh, “A violation of the Tsirelson bound in the pre-quantum theory of trace dynamics,” arXiv:2208.02209 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Time-like extra dimensions: non-locality, spin, and Tsirelson bound,

    M. Furquan, T. P. Singh, and P. S. Wesley, “Time-like extra dimensions: non-locality, spin, and Tsirelson bound,”Universe11, 137 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality,

    B. S. Cirel’son, “Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality,”Lett. Math. Phys.4, 93 (1980)

    work page 1980

  13. [13]

    Quantum nonlocality as an axiom,

    S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, “Quantum nonlocality as an axiom,”Found. Phys.24, 379 (1994)

    work page 1994

  14. [14]

    In models of spontaneous wave-function collapse, why only fermions collapse, not bosons?,

    T. P. Singh, “In models of spontaneous wave-function collapse, why only fermions collapse, not bosons?,” arXiv:2602.15044 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Fermion mass ratios from the exceptional Jordan algebra,

    T. P. Singh, “Fermion mass ratios from the exceptional Jordan algebra,” arXiv:2508.10131 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  16. [16]

    Gauge couplings of the Standard Model in the octonionic framework: a broken-phase mechanism for $\alpha_s/\alpha_{\mathrm{em}}=16$

    T. P. Singh, "Gauge Couplings of the Standard Model in the octonionic framework: a broken phase mechanism forαs/αem = 16", arXiv:2603.28810 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism,

    P. Jordan, J. von Neumann, and E. Wigner, “On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism,”Ann. Math.35, 29 (1934)

    work page 1934

  18. [18]

    Quark structure and octonions,

    M. Günaydin and F. Gürsey, “Quark structure and octonions,”J. Math. Phys.14, 1651 (1973)

    work page 1973

  19. [19]

    Quark statistics and octonions,

    M. Günaydin and F. Gürsey, “Quark statistics and octonions,”Phys. Rev. D9, 3387 (1974)

    work page 1974

  20. [20]

    The octonions,

    J. C. Baez, “The octonions,”Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.39, 145 (2002)

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    Generations: three prints, in colour,

    C. Furey, “Generations: three prints, in colour,”JHEP10, 046 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Three generations, two unbroken gauge symmetries, and one eight-dimensional algebra,

    C. Furey, “Three generations, two unbroken gauge symmetries, and one eight-dimensional algebra,”Phys. Lett. B785, 84 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Three fermion generations with two unbroken gauge symmetries from the complex sedenions,

    A. B. Gillard and N. G. Gresnigt, “Three fermion generations with two unbroken gauge symmetries from the complex sedenions,”Eur. Phys. J. C79, 446 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Octonion internal space algebra for the Standard Model,

    I. Todorov, “Octonion internal space algebra for the Standard Model,”Universe9, 222 (2023). 17

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Majorana neutrinos, exceptional Jordan algebra, and mass ratios for charged fermions,

    V. Bhatt, R. Mondal, V. Vaibhav, and T. P. Singh, “Majorana neutrinos, exceptional Jordan algebra, and mass ratios for charged fermions,”J. Phys. G49, 045007 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    CKM matrix parameters from the exceptional Jordan algebra,

    A. A. Patel and T. P. Singh, “CKM matrix parameters from the exceptional Jordan algebra,” Universe9, 440 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    The exceptional Jordan algebra, and its implications for our understanding of gravitation and the weak force,

    T. P. Singh, “The exceptional Jordan algebra, and its implications for our understanding of gravitation and the weak force,” arXiv:2304.01213 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Gravity and electroweak sector from symmetry breaking of anSO(3,3)BF theory,

    P. S. Wesley, T. P. Singh, and J. M. Isidro, “Gravity and electroweak sector from symmetry breaking of anSO(3,3)BF theory,” arXiv:2602.19151 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Theoretically motivated dark electromagnetism as the origin of relativistic MOND,

    F. Finster, J. M. Isidro, C. F. Paganini, and T. P. Singh, “Theoretically motivated dark electromagnetism as the origin of relativistic MOND,”Universe10, 123 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    A relativistic MOND,

    T. P. Singh, “A relativistic MOND,” arXiv:2601.04290 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Precise values of running quark and lepton masses in the standard model,

    G.-Y. Huang and S. Zhou, “Precise values of running quark and lepton masses in the standard model,”Phys. Rev. D103, 016010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Testing spontaneous collapse through bulk heating experiments: estimate of the background noise,

    R. Mishra, A. Vinante, and T. P. Singh, “Testing spontaneous collapse through bulk heating experiments: estimate of the background noise,”Phys. Rev. A98, 052121 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems,

    G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems,”Phys. Rev. D34, 470 (1986)

    work page 1986

  34. [34]

    Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous local- ization,

    P. Pearle, “Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous local- ization,”Phys. Rev. A39, 2277 (1989)

    work page 1989

  35. [35]

    Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests,

    A. Bassi, K. Lochan, S. Satin, T. P. Singh, and H. Ulbricht, “Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests,”Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 471 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Collapse models: a theoretical, experimental and philosophical review,

    A. Bassi, M. Dorato, and H. Ulbricht, “Collapse models: a theoretical, experimental and philosophical review,”Entropy25, 645 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Present status and future challenges of non- interferometric tests of collapse models

    M. Carlesso, S. Donadi, L. Ferialdi, M. Paternostro, H. Ulbricht and A. Bassi, “Present status and future challenges of non-interferometric tests of collapse models,” Nature Phys. 18(2022) no.3, 243-250 doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01489-5 [arXiv:2203.04231 [quant-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01489-5 2022

  38. [38]

    Challenging spontaneous quantum collapse with XENONnT,

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON Collaboration), “Challenging spontaneous quantum collapse with XENONnT,”Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 120201 (2026)

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Spontaneous localisation from a coarse-grained deterministic and non-unitary dynamics,

    K. Kakade, A. Singh, and T. P. Singh, “Spontaneous localisation from a coarse-grained deterministic and non-unitary dynamics,”Phys. Lett. A490, 129191 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Attosecond double-slit experiment,

    F. Lindneret al., “Attosecond double-slit experiment,”Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 040401 (2005)

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    Time domain double slit interference of electron produced by XUV synchrotron radiation,

    T. Kaneyasuet al., “Time domain double slit interference of electron produced by XUV synchrotron radiation,”Sci. Rep.13, 6142 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Testing wormhole-mediated entanglement with hydrogen,

    I. Javed and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Testing wormhole-mediated entanglement with hydrogen,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 121501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  43. [43]

    Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres,

    B. Hensenet al., “Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres,”Nature526, 682 (2015). 18

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons,

    M. Giustinaet al., “Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 250401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Strong loophole-free test of local realism,

    L. K. Shalmet al., “Strong loophole-free test of local realism,”Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 250402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Quantum gravity, holography, and minimal length,

    T. P. Singh, “Quantum gravity, holography, and minimal length,”Pramana95, 40 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Gravitation and quantum mechanics of macroscopic objects,

    F. Karolyhazy, “Gravitation and quantum mechanics of macroscopic objects,”Nuovo Cimento A42, 390 (1966)

    work page 1966

  48. [48]

    Limit to space-time measurement,

    Y. J. Ng and H. van Dam, “Limit to space-time measurement,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A9, 335 (1994)

    work page 1994

  49. [49]

    Interferometric constraints on quantum geometrical shear noise correlations,

    A. Chouet al., “Interferometric constraints on quantum geometrical shear noise correlations,” Class. Quantum Grav.34, 165005 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Interferometric constraints on spacelike coherent rotational fluctuations,

    J. W. Richardsonet al., “Interferometric constraints on spacelike coherent rotational fluctuations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 241301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle Physics,”Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Left-right symmetric fermions and sterile neutrinos from complex split biquaternions and bioctonions,

    V. Vaibhav and T. P. Singh, “Left-right symmetric fermions and sterile neutrinos from complex split biquaternions and bioctonions,”Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras33, 32 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Search for the Majorana nature of neutrinos in the inverted mass ordering region with KamLAND-Zen,

    S. Abeet al.(KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), “Search for the Majorana nature of neutrinos in the inverted mass ordering region with KamLAND-Zen,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 051801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    First results on the search for lepton number violating neutrinoless double-βdecay with the LEGEND-200 experiment,

    H. Acharyaet al.(LEGEND Collaboration), “First results on the search for lepton number violating neutrinoless double-βdecay with the LEGEND-200 experiment,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 022701 (2026)

    work page 2026

  55. [55]

    NuFIT-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, “NuFIT-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,”JHEP 12, 216 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Low exposure long-baseline neutrino oscillation sensitivity of the DUNE experiment,

    DUNE Collaboration, “Low exposure long-baseline neutrino oscillation sensitivity of the DUNE experiment,”Phys. Rev. D105, 072006 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Sensitivity of the Hyper-Kamiokande experiment to neutrino oscillation parameters using accelerator neutrinos,

    Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration, “Sensitivity of the Hyper-Kamiokande experiment to neutrino oscillation parameters using accelerator neutrinos,”Eur. Phys. J. C86, 170 (2026)

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    New view of quark and lepton mass hierarchy,

    Y. Koide, “New view of quark and lepton mass hierarchy,”Phys. Rev. D28, 252 (1983)

    work page 1983

  59. [59]

    CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022,

    P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, B. N. Taylor, and E. Tiesinga, “CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022,”Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 025002 (2025)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    A Lagrangian withE8×E8 symmetry for the standard model and pre-gravitation I: the bosonic Lagrangian, and a theoretical derivation of the weak mixing angle,

    S. Raj and T. P. Singh, “A Lagrangian withE8×E8 symmetry for the standard model and pre-gravitation I: the bosonic Lagrangian, and a theoretical derivation of the weak mixing angle,” arXiv:2208.09811 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Measurement of the effective leptonic weak mixing angle,

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb Collaboration), “Measurement of the effective leptonic weak mixing angle,”JHEP12, 026 (2024). 19

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis,

    M. Milgrom, “A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis,”Astrophys. J.270, 365 (1983)

    work page 1983

  63. [63]

    Relativistic gravitation theory for the MOND paradigm,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Relativistic gravitation theory for the MOND paradigm,”Phys. Rev. D 70, 083509 (2004)

    work page 2004

  64. [64]

    A new relativistic theory for modified Newtonian dynamics,

    C. Skordis and T. Zlosnik, “A new relativistic theory for modified Newtonian dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 161302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,

    J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,”Physics1, 195 (1964)

    work page 1964

  66. [66]

    Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 880 (1969)

    work page 1969

  67. [67]

    Galaxy clusters in Milgromian dynamics: missing matter, hydro- static bias, and the external field effect,

    R. Kelleher and F. Lelli, “Galaxy clusters in Milgromian dynamics: missing matter, hydro- static bias, and the external field effect,”Astron. Astrophys.688, A78 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Strong constraints on the gravitational law from Gaia DR3 wide binaries,

    I. Banik, C. Pittordis, W. Sutherland, B. Famaey, R. Ibata, S. Mieske, and H. Zhao, “Strong constraints on the gravitational law from Gaia DR3 wide binaries,”Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.527, 4573 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Wide binaries from Gaia DR3: testing GR vs MOND with realistic triple modelling,

    C. Pittordis, W. Sutherland, and P. Shepherd, “Wide binaries from Gaia DR3: testing GR vs MOND with realistic triple modelling,”Open J. Astrophys.8, 109 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    A quality framework for testing gravity with wide binaries: no evidence for MOND,

    S. A. Cookson, I. Banik, K. El-Badry, and C. J. Clarke, “A quality framework for testing gravity with wide binaries: no evidence for MOND,”Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.547, stag342 (2026)

    work page 2026

  71. [71]

    A., Allen C., 2012, @doi [European Physical Journal C] 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1884-6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012EPJC...72.1884H 72, 1884

    X. Hernandez, M. A. Jiménez, and C. Allen, “Wide binaries as a critical test of classical gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1884 (2012), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1884-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1884-6 2012

  72. [72]

    Challenging a Newtonian prediction through Gaia wide binaries,

    X. Hernandez, R. A. M. Cortés, C. Allen, and R. Scarpa, “Challenging a Newtonian prediction through Gaia wide binaries,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1950101 (2019), doi:10.1142/S0218271819501013

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271819501013 2019

  73. [73]

    Internal kinematics of Gaia eDR3 wide binaries,

    X. Hernandez, S. Cookson, and R. A. M. Cortés, “Internal kinematics of Gaia eDR3 wide binaries,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.509, 2304–2317 (2022), doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3038

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3038 2022

  74. [74]

    Internal kinematics of Gaia DR3 wide binaries: anomalous behaviour in the low acceleration regime,

    X. Hernandez, “Internal kinematics of Gaia DR3 wide binaries: anomalous behaviour in the low acceleration regime,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.525, 1401–1415 (2023), doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2306

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2306 2023

  75. [75]

    Statistical analysis of the gravitational anomaly in Gaia wide binaries,

    X. Hernandez, V. Verteletskyi, L. Nasser, and A. Aguayo-Ortiz, “Statistical analysis of the gravitational anomaly in Gaia wide binaries,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.528, 4720–4732 (2024), doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3446

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3446 2024

  76. [76]

    A critical review of recent Gaia wide binary gravity tests,

    X. Hernandez and K.-H. Chae, “A critical review of recent Gaia wide binary gravity tests,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.533, 729 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    A recent confirmation of the wide binary gravitational anomaly,

    X. Hernandez and P. Kroupa, “A recent confirmation of the wide binary gravitational anomaly,”Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.537, 2925 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    S., Bindi, V., Zhang, M., Feng, X., 2019, A Numerical Study of Cosmic Proton Modulation Using AMS-02 Observations , Astrophys

    K.-H. Chae, “Breakdown of the Newton–Einstein standard gravity at low acceleration in internal dynamics of wide binary stars,” Astrophys. J.952, 128 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ace101. 20

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2023

  79. [79]

    Robust evidence for the breakdown of standard gravity at low acceleration from statistically pure binaries free of hidden companions,

    K.-H. Chae, “Robust evidence for the breakdown of standard gravity at low acceleration from statistically pure binaries free of hidden companions,” Astrophys. J.960, 114 (2024), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0ed5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0ed5 2024

  80. [80]

    K.-H. Chae, “Measurements of the low-acceleration gravitational anomaly from the nor- malized velocity profile of Gaia wide binary stars and statistical testing of Newtonian and Milgromian theories,” Astrophys. J.972, 186 (2024), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e9 2024

Showing first 80 references.