pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07107 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Continuous-variable two-dimensional cluster states in the microwave domain

Fabio Lingua , Michele Cortinovis , J. C. Rivera Hern\'andez , David B. Haviland
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords continuous-variable cluster statesJosephson parametric amplifiermicrowave quantum opticsnullifier squeezinghoneycomb latticesquare latticemultipartite entanglementparametric amplification
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Josephson parametric amplifier pumped by multiple coherent tones produces two-dimensional continuous-variable cluster states spanning 191 microwave modes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The work shows that vacuum fluctuations entering a Josephson parametric amplifier can be converted into large-scale two-dimensional cluster states by applying three or four carefully chosen pump tones. With three tones the resulting state follows a honeycomb lattice; with four tones it follows a square lattice. Both geometries are verified by measuring squeezing of the cluster-state nullifiers up to 1.2 dB below the vacuum level together with an analysis of hidden entanglement that remains negligible at the operating point. The approach therefore supplies a compact microwave-frequency resource for continuous-variable measurement-based quantum computation.

Core claim

By exposing vacuum fluctuations to the input of a Josephson Parametric Amplifier parametrically pumped by a sum of three or four coherent tones around twice its resonant frequency, interference between mixing products is engineered to realize honeycomb and square lattice CV cluster states involving 191 modes, confirmed by a nullifier test that reaches up to -1.2 dB squeezing and by a hidden-entanglement analysis showing negligible hidden entanglement at optimal squeezing.

What carries the argument

Parametric pumping of the Josephson parametric amplifier by a sum of coherent tones, whose frequencies, amplitudes and phases are chosen so that the interference among the generated mixing products produces the quadrature correlations required for the target lattice cluster state.

If this is right

  • A single device can generate cluster states whose size is set by the amplifier bandwidth rather than by the number of separate squeezers.
  • Lattice geometry can be switched between honeycomb and square simply by changing the number of pump tones from three to four.
  • The measured nullifier squeezing directly quantifies the quality of the generated resource for measurement-based protocols.
  • Hidden entanglement stays low across the range of squeezing values tested, indicating that the observed correlations are not an artifact of partial information.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same multi-tone pumping technique could be applied to wider-bandwidth amplifiers or to cascaded devices to reach thousands of modes.
  • Because the entire process occurs inside a superconducting circuit, the generated states are immediately compatible with existing microwave quantum-control hardware.
  • Extending the method to include frequency-dependent phase shifts or additional tones could produce cluster states with different connectivity graphs or higher effective dimension.

Load-bearing premise

The observed nullifier squeezing together with the hidden-entanglement measurements are enough to establish genuine multipartite cluster-state entanglement without unaccounted experimental artifacts or post-selection.

What would settle it

A complete measurement of the 191-mode covariance matrix that yields nullifier variances no lower than the vacuum level, or that fails to match the specific linear combinations expected for the honeycomb or square lattice, would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07107 by David B. Haviland, Fabio Lingua, J. C. Rivera Hern\'andez, Michele Cortinovis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Equally spaced modes (spacing ∆) around [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Frequency-comb architecture centered at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Square-lattice configuration: measured covariance matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Normalized nullifier variance ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Frequency-comb arrangement around [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Minimum normalized nullifier variance ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Hidden entanglement analysis. (a) Hidden entanglement ratio (HER) versus normalized pump amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Schematic of the experimental setup, including room [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We demonstrate the experimental realization of two-dimensional, continuous variable (CV) cluster states between 191 microwave frequency modes. This result is obtained by exposing vacuum fluctuations to the input of a Josephson Parametric Amplifier, parametrically pumped by a sum of coherent tones around twice its resonant frequency. By carefully tuning pump frequencies, amplitudes, and phases we engineer the interference between mixing products and realize honeycomb and square lattice CV cluster states with three and four pump tones respectively. We prove the presence of the cluster states with a suitable nullifier test, reaching up to $-1.2$ dB of squeezing of the cluster state's nullifiers. We study hidden entanglement (HE) and show no hidden entanglement up to $\sim -1$ dB of squeezing and negligible HE at optimal squeezing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of two-dimensional continuous-variable cluster states spanning 191 microwave modes, generated by multi-tone parametric pumping of a Josephson Parametric Amplifier. Honeycomb and square lattices are realized with three and four pump tones, respectively, and certified via a nullifier test reaching -1.2 dB squeezing together with a hidden-entanglement analysis showing negligible hidden entanglement at optimal squeezing.

Significance. If the lattice-specific certification holds, the result would be a notable advance in scalable microwave-domain CV quantum information processing, showing that multi-tone pumping can deterministically engineer large 2D cluster-state graphs from vacuum fluctuations. The approach offers a potentially parameter-efficient route to high-mode-number entanglement without requiring individual mode addressing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results / nullifier test] The nullifier test (results section describing the squeezing measurements): while an average or collective squeezing of -1.2 dB is reported, the manuscript does not present per-nullifier variances or the full 382-dimensional covariance matrix. For a claim of a specific 2D lattice (honeycomb or square), each nullifier must be shown to match the exact linear combination dictated by the target adjacency matrix; an aggregate squeezing value alone cannot exclude alternative connectivities (e.g., 1D chains or denser graphs) produced by the same pump tones.
  2. [Hidden entanglement analysis] Hidden-entanglement analysis (section on HE): the biseparability test is performed in the nullifier basis chosen for the intended lattice. Without an independent verification that the measured correlations are inconsistent with other graphs compatible with the pump spectrum, the HE bound does not fully rule out that a subset of the 191 modes remains unentangled or connected differently.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and Methods] Figure captions and methods should explicitly list the pump-tone frequencies, amplitudes, and phases used for each lattice, together with the precise nullifier operators employed in the squeezing measurement.
  2. [Results] Error bars, statistical significance, and calibration procedures for the -1.2 dB squeezing value are not detailed in the provided text; these should be added to allow quantitative assessment of the result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The nullifier test (results section describing the squeezing measurements): while an average or collective squeezing of -1.2 dB is reported, the manuscript does not present per-nullifier variances or the full 382-dimensional covariance matrix. For a claim of a specific 2D lattice (honeycomb or square), each nullifier must be shown to match the exact linear combination dictated by the target adjacency matrix; an aggregate squeezing value alone cannot exclude alternative connectivities (e.g., 1D chains or denser graphs) produced by the same pump tones.

    Authors: We agree that reporting the individual nullifier variances strengthens the certification of the specific lattice. In the revised manuscript we will add a table (or supplementary figure) listing the measured variance for each nullifier of the honeycomb and square lattices, confirming that every nullifier reaches squeezing consistent with the target adjacency matrix. The full 382-by-382 covariance matrix cannot be displayed in the main text or supplementary material because of its size; however, the nullifier test is the established, efficient method for verifying the exact linear combinations required by the graph. The multi-tone pump frequencies, amplitudes and phases are chosen to produce only the mixing products that realize the desired adjacency matrix, and we will add a short discussion explaining why other connectivities (such as 1D chains) are incompatible with the observed interference pattern. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Hidden-entanglement analysis (section on HE): the biseparability test is performed in the nullifier basis chosen for the intended lattice. Without an independent verification that the measured correlations are inconsistent with other graphs compatible with the pump spectrum, the HE bound does not fully rule out that a subset of the 191 modes remains unentangled or connected differently.

    Authors: The hidden-entanglement bound is evaluated in the nullifier basis to detect entanglement beyond the nullifiers. We acknowledge that an exhaustive comparison against every graph compatible with the pump spectrum would be desirable. In revision we will expand the HE section to note that the discrete set of pump tones restricts the generated correlations to the specific mixing products required by the target lattice; alternative connectivities would require different pump frequencies and are therefore excluded by the experimental configuration. We will also clarify that the HE analysis already shows negligible hidden entanglement at the optimal squeezing level, supporting the conclusion that the full 191-mode cluster state is realized. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental demonstration

full rationale

The paper reports a direct experimental realization of 2D CV cluster states by multi-tone pumping of a JPA, with certification via measured nullifier squeezing (up to -1.2 dB) and hidden entanglement analysis. No mathematical derivation, prediction, or first-principles result is presented that reduces to self-defined quantities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The nullifier test applies standard CV cluster-state definitions to the engineered graph; any question of whether the measurements fully certify the exact 191-mode lattice connectivity is an evidentiary concern, not a circular reduction by construction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental tuning of pump parameters and standard assumptions from quantum optics rather than new theoretical constructs or derivations.

free parameters (1)
  • Pump tone frequencies, amplitudes, and phases
    Carefully tuned to engineer interference between mixing products for honeycomb and square lattice structures.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics of parametric amplification and vacuum fluctuations
    Generation of squeezing from vacuum input and nullifier properties rely on established quantum optics theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5435 in / 1191 out tokens · 40610 ms · 2026-05-10T18:01:00.270342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Briegel, D.E

    H.J. Briegel, D.E. Browne, W. D¨ ur, R. Raussendorf, M. Van Den Nest, Measurement-based quantum com- putation. Nature Physics5(1), 19–26 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nphys1157. URLhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/nphys1157

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1157 2009

  2. [2]

    Menicucci, P

    N.C. Menicucci, P. van Loock, M. Gu, C. Weed- brook, T.C. Ralph, M.A. Nielsen, Universal Quantum Computation with Continuous-Variable Cluster States. Physical Review Letters97(11), 110501 (2006). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.110501. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.110501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.110501 2006

  3. [3]

    Briegel , Date-Added =

    R. Raussendorf, H.J. Briegel, A One-Way Quantum Computer. Physical Review Letters86(22), 5188–5191 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 2001

  4. [4]

    Raussendorf, D.E

    R. Raussendorf, D.E. Browne, H.J. Briegel, Measurement-based quantum computation with cluster states. Physical Review A68(2), 022312 (2003). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022312. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0301052. ArXiv:quant-ph/0301052

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022312 2003

  5. [5]

    Menicucci, One-Way Quantum Computing in the Optical Frequency Comb

    N.C. Menicucci, One-Way Quantum Computing in the Optical Frequency Comb. Physical Review Letters 101(13) (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.130501 10

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.130501 2008

  6. [6]

    M. Gu, C. Weedbrook, N.C. Menicucci, T.C. Ralph, P. Van Loock, Quantum computing with continuous- variable clusters. Physical Review A79(6), 062318 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.79.062318. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.062318

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.79.062318 2009

  7. [7]

    Zhang, S.L

    J. Zhang, S.L. Braunstein, Continuous-variable Gaussian analog of cluster states. Physical Review A73(3), 032318 (2006). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.032318. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.032318

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.73.032318 2006

  8. [8]

    Weedbrooket al., Gaussian quantum in- formation, Rev

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N.J. Cerf, T.C. Ralph, J.H. Shapiro, S. Lloyd, Gaussian quan- tum information. Reviews of Modern Physics84(2), 621–669 (2012). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.84. 621

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.621 2012

  9. [9]

    Menicucci, Fault-Tolerant Measurement-Based Quantum Computing with Continuous-Variable Cluster States

    N.C. Menicucci, Fault-Tolerant Measurement-Based Quantum Computing with Continuous-Variable Cluster States. Physical Review Letters112(12), 120504 (2014). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120504. URLhttps:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.120504 2014

  10. [10]

    Chen, N.C

    M. Chen, N.C. Menicucci, O. Pfister, Experimen- tal Realization of Multipartite Entanglement of 60 Modes of a Quantum Optical Frequency Comb. Phys- ical Review Letters112(12), 120505 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120505. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120505

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.120505 2014

  11. [11]

    Pfister, Continuous-variable quantum computing in the quantum optical frequency comb

    O. Pfister, Continuous-variable quantum computing in the quantum optical frequency comb. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 53(1), 012001 (2020). doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab526f. URLhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 1361-6455/ab526f

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab526f 2020

  12. [12]

    Yukawa, R

    M. Yukawa, R. Ukai, P. Van Loock, A. Furusawa, Ex- perimental generation of four-mode continuous-variable cluster states. Physical Review A78(1), 012301 (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012301. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012301

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.78.012301 2008

  13. [13]

    Menicucci, X

    N.C. Menicucci, X. Ma, T.C. Ralph, Arbitrar- ily Large Continuous-Variable Cluster States from a Single Quantum Nondemolition Gate. Physi- cal Review Letters104(25), 250503 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.250503. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.250503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.250503 2010

  14. [14]

    Menicucci, Temporal-mode continuous-variable cluster states using linear optics

    N.C. Menicucci, Temporal-mode continuous-variable cluster states using linear optics. Physical Review A 83(6), 062314 (2011). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062314. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 83.062314

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.83.062314 2011

  15. [15]

    Yokoyama et al., „Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time do- main”, Nat

    S. Yokoyama, R. Ukai, S.C. Armstrong, C. Sorn- phiphatphong, T. Kaji, S. Suzuki, J.i. Yoshikawa, H. Yonezawa, N.C. Menicucci, A. Furusawa, Ultra-large- scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain. Nature Photonics7(12), 982–986 (2013). doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.287. URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/nphoton.2013.287

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.287 2013

  16. [16]

    Y. Cai, J. Roslund, G. Ferrini, F. Arzani, X. Xu, C. Fabre, N. Treps, Multimode entanglement in recon- figurable graph states using optical frequency combs. Nature Communications8(1), 15645 (2017). doi: 10.1038/ncomms15645. URLhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/ncomms15645

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms15645 2017

  17. [17]

    Asavanant, Y

    W. Asavanant, Y. Shiozawa, S. Yokoyama, B. Charoen- sombutamon, H. Emura, R.N. Alexander, S. Takeda, J.i. Yoshikawa, N.C. Menicucci, H. Yonezawa, A. Furusawa, Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state. Science366(6463), 373–376 (2019). doi: 10.1126/science.aay2645. URLhttps://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.aay2645

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aay2645 2019

  18. [18]

    Larsen, X

    M.V. Larsen, X. Guo, C.R. Breum, J.S. Neergaard- Nielsen, U.L. Andersen, Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state. Science366(6463), 369– 372 (2019). doi:10.1126/science.aay4354. URLhttps: //www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aay4354

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aay4354 2019

  19. [19]

    Machine behaviour

    L.S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M.F. Askarani, F. Rortais, T. Vincent, J.F.F. Bulmer, F.M. Miatto, L. Neuhaus, L.G. Helt, M.J. Collins, A.E. Lita, T. Gerrits, S.W. Nam, V.D. Vaidya, M. Menotti, I. Dhand, Z. Ver- non, N. Quesada, J. Lavoie, Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature606(7912), 75–81 (2022). doi:10.1038/s41586...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586- 2022

  20. [20]

    A full-stack analog optical quantum computing platform with one hundred inputs

    S. Yokoyama, A. Sakaguchi, W. Asavanant, K. Takase, Y.R. Chen, H. Nagayoshi, J.i. Yoshikawa, T. Kashi- wazaki, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, T. Hashimoto, T. Hiraoka, A. Furusawa, H. Yonezawa. Full-stack Analog Optical Quantum Computer with A Hundred Inputs (2025). doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.16147. URLhttp://arxiv.org/ abs/2506.16147. ArXiv:2506.16147 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.16147 2025

  21. [21]

    Menzel, R

    E.P. Menzel, R. Di Candia, F. Deppe, P. Eder, L. Zhong, M. Ihmig, M. Haeberlein, A. Baust, E. Hoffmann, D. Ballester, K. Inomata, T. Yamamoto, Y. Naka- mura, E. Solano, A. Marx, R. Gross, Path Entan- glement of Continuous-Variable Quantum Microwaves. Physical Review Letters109(25), 250502 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.250502. URLhttps://link. aps.o...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.250502 2012

  22. [22]

    Jolin, G

    S.W. Jolin, G. Andersson, J.C.R. Hern´ andez, I. Strand- berg, F. Quijandr´ ıa, J. Aumentado, R. Borgani, M.O. Thol´ en, D.B. Haviland, Multipartite Entan- glement in a Microwave Frequency Comb. Phys- ical Review Letters130(12), 120601 (2023). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.120601. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.120601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.120601 2023

  23. [23]

    Hern´ andez, F

    J.C.R. Hern´ andez, F. Lingua, S.W. Jolin, D.B. Havi- land, Control of multi-modal scattering in a microwave frequency comb. APL Quantum1(3), 036101 (2024). doi: 10.1063/5.0203426. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402. 09068. ArXiv:2402.09068 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0203426 2024

  24. [24]

    Eichler, D

    C. Eichler, D. Bozyigit, C. Lang, M. Baur, L. Steffen, J.M. Fink, S. Filipp, A. Wallraff, Observation of Two- Mode Squeezing in the Microwave Frequency Domain. Physical Review Letters107(11), 113601 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.113601. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.113601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.113601 2011

  25. [25]

    Petrovnin, M.R

    K.V. Petrovnin, M.R. Perelshtein, T. Korkalainen, V. Vesterinen, I. Lilja, G.S. Paraoanu, P.J. Hako- nen, Generation and Structuring of Multipartite En- tanglement in a Josephson Parametric System. Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies6(1), 2200031 (2023). doi: 10.1002/qute.202200031. URLhttps://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/qute.202200031

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202200031 2023

  26. [26]

    Alocco, A

    A. Alocco, A. Celotto, E. Palumbo, B. Galvano, P. Livreri, L. Fasolo, L. Callegaro, E. Enrico. Pro- grammable Microwave Cluster States via Josephson Metamaterials (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.22823. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22823. ArXiv:2507.22823 [quant-ph] 11

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.22823 2025

  27. [27]

    Lingua, J

    F. Lingua, J. Rivera Hern´ andez, M. Cortinovis, D.B. Haviland, Continuous-Variable Square-Ladder Cluster States in a Microwave Frequency Comb. Physi- cal Review Letters134(18), 183602 (2025). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.183602. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.183602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.183602 2025

  28. [28]

    Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity.Nature Commun., 14(1):7910, 2023

    J. O’Sullivan, K. Reuer, A. Grigorev, X. Dai, A. Hern´ andez-Ant´ on, M.H. Mu˜ noz-Arias, C. Hellings, A. Flasby, D. Colao Zanuz, J.C. Besse, A. Blais, D. Malz, C. Eichler, A. Wallraff, Deterministic generation of two- dimensional multi-photon cluster states. Nature Com- munications16(1), 5505 (2025). doi:10.1038/s41467- 025-60472-3. URLhttps://www.nature...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467- 2025

  29. [29]

    Menicucci, S.T

    N.C. Menicucci, S.T. Flammia, P. Van Loock, Graphi- cal calculus for Gaussian pure states. Physical Review A 83(4), 042335 (2011). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.042335. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 83.042335

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.83.042335 2011

  30. [30]

    Van Loock, C

    P. Van Loock, C. Weedbrook, M. Gu, Building Gaus- sian cluster states by linear optics. Physical Review A 76(3), 032321 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.76.032321. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 76.032321

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.76.032321 2007

  31. [31]

    Ohliger, K

    M. Ohliger, K. Kieling, J. Eisert, Limitations of quantum computing with Gaussian cluster states. Physical Review A82(4), 042336 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.042336. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.042336

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042336 2010

  32. [32]

    Gonz´ alez-Arciniegas, P

    C. Gonz´ alez-Arciniegas, P. Nussenzveig, M. Martinelli, O. Pfister, Cluster States from Gaussian States: Essen- tial Diagnostic Tools for Continuous-Variable One-Way Quantum Computing. PRX Quantum2(3), 030343 (2021). doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030343. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2. 030343

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030343 2021

  33. [33]

    Simon, E.C.G

    R. Simon, E.C.G. Sudarshan, N. Mukunda, Gaussian pure states in quantum mechanics and the symplectic group. Physical Review A37(8), 3028–3038 (1988). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.37.3028. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.3028

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.37.3028 1988

  34. [34]

    See Supplemental Material aturl_provided_by_publisher, which includes Refs

    Supplemental material: Continuous-variable two- dimensional cluster states in the microwave domain. See Supplemental Material aturl_provided_by_publisher, which includes Refs. [39-43]

  35. [35]

    Cortinovis, F

    M. Cortinovis, F. Lingua, D.B. Haviland. The inverse parametric problem (2025). doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.15453. URLhttp://arxiv. org/abs/2512.15453. ArXiv:2512.15453 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.15453 2025

  36. [36]

    Thol´ en, R

    M.O. Thol´ en, R. Borgani, G.R. Di Carlo, A. Bengtsson, C. Kriˇ zan, M. Kudra, G. Tancredi, J. Bylander, P. Dels- ing, S. Gasparinetti, D.B. Haviland, Measurement and control of a superconducting quantum processor with a fully integrated radio-frequency system on a chip. Re- view of Scientific Instruments93(10), 104711 (2022). doi: 10.1063/5.0101398. URLh...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0101398 2022

  37. [37]

    Mariantoni, E.P

    M. Mariantoni, E.P. Menzel, F. Deppe, M.A. Araque Ca- ballero, A. Baust, T. Niemczyk, E. Hoffmann, E. Solano, A. Marx, R. Gross, Planck Spectroscopy and Quan- tum Noise of Microwave Beam Splitters. Physi- cal Review Letters105(13), 133601 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.133601. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.133601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.133601 2010

  38. [38]

    Shchukin, P

    E. Shchukin, P. van Loock, Recovering Quan- tum Properties of Continuous-Variable States in the Presence of Measurement Errors. Physical Review Letters117(14), 140504 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.140504. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.140504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.140504 2016

  39. [39]

    Malnou, M

    M. Malnou, M. Vissers, J. Wheeler, J. Aumen- tado, J. Hubmayr, J. Ullom, J. Gao, Three-Wave Mixing Kinetic Inductance Traveling-Wave Am- plifier with Near-Quantum-Limited Noise Per- formance. PRX Quantum2(1), 010302 (2021). doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010302. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010302

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010302 2021

  40. [40]

    Holevo, R.F

    A.S. Holevo, R.F. Werner, Evaluating capacities of bosonic Gaussian channels. Physical Review A 63(3), 032312 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.63.032312. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 63.032312

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.63.032312 2001

  41. [41]

    Clerk, M.H

    A.A. Clerk, M.H. Devoret, S.M. Girvin, F. Mar- quardt, R.J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification. Reviews of Modern Physics82(2), 1155–1208 (2010). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1155. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1155

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1155 2010

  42. [42]

    Simon, N

    R. Simon, N. Mukunda, B. Dutta, Quantum-noise ma- trix for multimode systems: U(n) invariance, squeezing, and normal forms. Physical Review A49(3), 1567–1583 (1994). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1567. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1567

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.49.1567 1994

  43. [43]

    ˆpi− P j∈Gi hij ˆxj # Y k,j∈G eiAkj xkxj |x1⟩. . .|x i⟩. . .|x n⟩= = 1 2π ZZ d⃗ x e −iξi

    Y. Yamamoto, K. Semba (eds.),Principles and Meth- ods of Quantum Information Technologies,Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 911 (Springer Japan, Tokyo, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55756-2. URLhttps://link. springer.com/10.1007/978-4-431-55756-2 Supplemental material: Continuous-variable two-dimensional cluster states in the microwave domain Fabio Lingua,1,∗...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55756-2 2016

  44. [44]

    Pfister, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 012001 (2020)

    O. Pfister, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 012001 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Malnou, M

    M. Malnou, M. Vissers, J. Wheeler, J. Aumentado, J. Hubmayr, J. Ullom, and J. Gao, PRX Quantum2, 010302 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    A. S. Holevo and R. F. Werner, Physical Review A63, 032312 (2001)

    2001

  47. [47]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 621 (2012)

    2012

  48. [48]

    K. V. Petrovnin, M. R. Perelshtein, T. Korkalainen, V. Vesterinen, I. Lilja, G. S. Paraoanu, and P. J. Hako- nen, Advanced Quantum Technologies6, 2200031 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Mariantoni, E

    M. Mariantoni, E. P. Menzel, F. Deppe, M. A. Araque Caballero, A. Baust, T. Niemczyk, E. Hoffmann, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Physical Review Let- ters105, 133601 (2010)

    2010

  50. [50]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 1155 (2010)

    2010

  51. [51]

    M. O. Thol´ en, R. Borgani, G. R. Di Carlo, A. Bengtsson, 6 C. Kriˇ zan, M. Kudra, G. Tancredi, J. Bylander, P. Dels- ing, S. Gasparinetti, and D. B. Haviland, Review of Sci- entific Instruments93, 104711 (2022)

    2022

  52. [52]

    Simon, N

    R. Simon, N. Mukunda, and B. Dutta, Physical Review A49, 1567 (1994)

    1994

  53. [53]

    Shchukin and P

    E. Shchukin and P. van Loock, Physical Review Letters 117, 140504 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    Yamamoto and K

    Y. Yamamoto and K. Semba, eds.,Principles and Meth- ods of Quantum Information Technologies, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 911 (Springer Japan, Tokyo, 2016)

    2016