pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07134 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Recognition: unknown

LightCurveLynx: Forward Modeling of Time-Domain Surveys with Application to ZTF SN Ia DR2

Mi Dai , Jeremy Kubica , Konstantin Malanchev , Alex I. Malz , Olivia Lynn , Andrew Connolly , Rachel Mandelbaum , W.M. Wood-Vasey
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords forward modelingtime-domain astronomysupernova simulationsType Ia supernovaeZTF surveylight curve analysisHubble diagramsimulation validation
0
0 comments X

The pith

LightCurveLynx generates realistic supernova light curve simulations that closely match ZTF observations in distributions and completeness.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces LightCurveLynx as a flexible framework that takes survey metadata and produces end-to-end simulations of time-domain light curves. It validates the tool by creating a mock sample of Type Ia supernovae that reproduces the ZTF SN Ia DR2 dataset. The simulated and real samples agree closely on parameter distributions and noise properties, and the simulated Hubble diagram confirms the real sample is complete to redshift 0.06. A reader would care because such forward modeling supports testing analysis pipelines, optimizing survey designs, and performing simulation-based inference without relying solely on limited real data.

Core claim

LightCurveLynx produces a realistic simulation of Type Ia supernovae representative of the ZTF SN Ia Data Release 2, achieving excellent agreement with the observed sample in parameter distributions (Kullback-Leibler divergence values around 0.01-0.02) and noise properties, while the generated Hubble diagram indicates sample completeness up to redshift 0.06 consistent with prior work.

What carries the argument

LightCurveLynx, a flexible and extensible software framework that performs end-to-end forward modeling of time-domain light curves from real survey metadata, forecasted plans, or user-defined mock strategies.

If this is right

  • Analysis pipelines for time-domain surveys can be developed and validated using the simulated samples as ground truth.
  • Survey strategies can be optimized by generating forecasts from planned metadata and comparing outcomes.
  • Simulation-based inference studies become feasible for cosmological parameters derived from supernova samples.
  • The framework supports extension to other transient types or surveys by swapping in new metadata and models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same forward-modeling approach could help quantify selection biases in future large surveys where real data will be even more incomplete.
  • Integration with cosmological fitting codes might allow direct propagation of simulation uncertainties into Hubble diagram analyses.
  • The low divergence values suggest the tool could serve as a benchmark for comparing different supernova population models.

Load-bearing premise

The input survey metadata, supernova population models, and forward-modeling assumptions accurately reproduce real observational selection effects and intrinsic supernova properties without introducing unaccounted biases.

What would settle it

Running LightCurveLynx on an independent time-domain survey dataset and obtaining Kullback-Leibler divergence values substantially larger than 0.01-0.02 across multiple parameters would indicate the framework fails to generalize.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07134 by Alex I. Malz, Andrew Connolly, Jeremy Kubica, Konstantin Malanchev, Mi Dai, Olivia Lynn, Rachel Mandelbaum, W.M. Wood-Vasey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic overview of the LightCurveLynx framework, showing the major components and data flow in a typical simulation pipeline. A typical LightCurveLynx simulation begins with the definition of Parameter Models, which specify the statistical distributions and relationships among all physical parameters (the priors). These dependencies can be represented as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), where parameter d… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The selection functions for the SN Ia light curve parameters x1 and c. Solid orange lines represent the selection functions derived following the procedure in Section 3.1.3; blue dots represent the recovered selection function from the simula￾tions. The selection functions are re-scaled so that the relative selection ratio is 1 when x1 and c are zero. Modeling selection effects in parameter models —In orde… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top panel: An example of a simulated light curve of a randomly selected real ZTFSNDR2 object. The solid dots are the ZTFSNDR2 data for this object, the transparent points show 100 realizations of the simulated light curves using the same set of best-fit light curve parameters for this object. The spread in the points represents random realizations of the simulated band fluxes from the same Gaussian errors.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The redshift distributions of the simulation (blue histogram) and ZTFSNDR2 (orange histogram). Both samples are after light curve quality cuts described in Section 3.7. The dashed lines show the best-fit skewed-normal distribution (Eq. 6). The ZTFSNDR2 shows some deviations from the skewed-normal distribution, which is likely due to statistical fluctuations and/or unknown systematics. Overall, the two dist… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the SALT parameters x1 and c distributions for the simulation and ZTFSNDR2 after light curve quality and light curve fitting cuts. For both plots the blue histograms are the x1(a)/c(b) parameter distributions of the simulated values, and the orange histograms are the x1(a)/c(b) parameter distributions of the ZTFSNDR2 values. The dashed lines show the best-fit Gaussian Mixture models with 2 co… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SALT x1 parameter vs host galaxy stellar mass. Main (Bottom) panel: Solid lines show the density contours of the Host Mass - x1 space, estimated using Kernel Density Estimation (KDE); dashed lines show the best fit Gaussian Mixture model contours. Blue lines represent the simulation; orange lines represent ZTFSNDR2. Scatter plot of individual Host Mass - x1 pairs are shown in transparent dots. Top panel: t… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) comparisons between the simulation and ZTFSNDR2. user-friendly, and extensible framework that meets the growing needs of the time-domain astronomy community in the era of large and deep surveys such as LSST and Roman. We demonstrate the functionalities and validate the credibility of LightCurveLynx through a use case of simulating a realistic SN Ia sample as observed by ZTF. We … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Flux and flux error contours for all detections (a), and all detections at the maximum flux of each SN (b). We confirm that LightCurveLynx is ready to be used by the community, and we encourage community feedback and contributions moving forward. APPENDIX We describe the caveats in calculating sky background in Appendix A. A. CAVEATS ABOUT SKY BACKGROUND The sky background is needed to simulate realistic n… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The Hubble Diagram from the simulated sample. Upper panel: Hubble diagram of 2992 simulated SN Ia that passed the selection and quality cuts defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Binned Hubble residuals against host galaxy mass, and light curve parameters x1 and c for a sample with z < 0.06. No significant bias is present in any of these parameter spaces. underestimating the flux errors by 12%, while using the metadata DB values leads to overestimating the flux errors by 19%. In a similar effort, M. Amenouche et al. (2025) compared the simulated errors in two simulations: one used… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present LightCurveLynx, a flexible and extensible software framework for end-to-end forward modeling time-domain light curves. Given the growing need for realistic simulations in the time-domain astronomy community, LightCurveLynx is designed to support a wide range of applications, including the development and validation of analysis pipelines, the optimization of survey strategies, and simulation-based inference studies. Realistic simulations can be generated from real survey metadata, forecasted survey plans, or user-defined mock survey strategies. We demonstrate the functionality of LightCurveLynx by generating a realistic simulation of Type Ia supernovae that is representative of the ZTF SN Ia Data Release 2 dataset and perform extensive comparisons between the simulated and observed samples to validate the software. The simulation shows excellent agreement with the data in parameter distributions (with the Kullback-Leibler divergence values around 0.01-0.02) and in noise properties. The Hubble diagram generated from the simulation also indicates that the sample is complete up to redshift 0.06, which is consistent with previous studies. Our results confirm that LightCurveLynx is robust, accurate, and ready for community use and contribution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents LightCurveLynx, a flexible software framework for end-to-end forward modeling of time-domain light curves from real survey metadata, forecasted plans, or user-defined strategies. It demonstrates the framework by generating a simulation of Type Ia supernovae representative of the ZTF SN Ia DR2 dataset, with validation showing excellent agreement in parameter distributions (KL divergences of 0.01-0.02), noise properties, and a Hubble diagram indicating completeness to z=0.06 consistent with prior work. The authors conclude the tool is robust and ready for community use.

Significance. If the forward-modeling pipeline reproduces observational selection effects and intrinsic properties without unaccounted biases, LightCurveLynx would provide a valuable extensible tool for pipeline validation, survey optimization, and simulation-based inference in time-domain astronomy. The reported quantitative matches with external ZTF data support potential utility, but significance hinges on whether input models were held fixed from independent sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and demonstration/validation sections] Abstract and demonstration/validation sections: the claim that the simulation is 'representative of' the ZTF SN Ia DR2 and shows 'excellent agreement' (KL divergences 0.01-0.02) does not specify whether supernova population parameters (rate, stretch/color distributions) and detection-efficiency/selection functions were taken exclusively from independent literature sources and frozen before any comparison, or whether modest adjustments were made to minimize the reported divergences. Without this, the validation tests calibration rather than the correctness of the simulation engine, undermining the central claim that LightCurveLynx is bias-free for new surveys or inference tasks.
  2. [Validation results (Hubble diagram and completeness statement)] Validation results (Hubble diagram and completeness statement): the conclusion that the sample is complete up to redshift 0.06 is presented as confirmation of the framework, but this rests on the same unstated assumption about input fidelity; if selection effects were tuned to match the observed redshift distribution, the agreement does not independently establish that the forward-modeling of survey metadata and light-curve generation is accurate for uncalibrated applications.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract lacks any mention of model construction details, error propagation, or the exact sources of input metadata and population models; adding a brief statement would improve clarity without altering the technical content.
  2. Consider including a dedicated table or subsection listing all fixed input parameters (e.g., SN rate, stretch/color priors, efficiency curves) with explicit literature citations to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and insightful comments, which highlight the importance of clearly documenting the independence of our input models. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our validation approach.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and demonstration/validation sections] Abstract and demonstration/validation sections: the claim that the simulation is 'representative of' the ZTF SN Ia DR2 and shows 'excellent agreement' (KL divergences 0.01-0.02) does not specify whether supernova population parameters (rate, stretch/color distributions) and detection-efficiency/selection functions were taken exclusively from independent literature sources and frozen before any comparison, or whether modest adjustments were made to minimize the reported divergences. Without this, the validation tests calibration rather than the correctness of the simulation engine, undermining the central claim that LightCurveLynx is bias-free for new surveys or inference tasks.

    Authors: All supernova population parameters (rate, stretch, and color distributions) and detection-efficiency/selection functions were taken exclusively from independent literature sources and held fixed before generating the simulation or performing any comparisons. No adjustments were made to minimize the reported KL divergences; the values of 0.01-0.02 therefore reflect the fidelity of the LightCurveLynx forward-modeling engine itself. We will revise the abstract and validation sections to explicitly state that inputs were frozen from independent sources, thereby confirming that the tests validate the simulation framework rather than calibrate it. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Validation results (Hubble diagram and completeness statement)] Validation results (Hubble diagram and completeness statement): the conclusion that the sample is complete up to redshift 0.06 is presented as confirmation of the framework, but this rests on the same unstated assumption about input fidelity; if selection effects were tuned to match the observed redshift distribution, the agreement does not independently establish that the forward-modeling of survey metadata and light-curve generation is accurate for uncalibrated applications.

    Authors: The completeness to z=0.06 is a direct output of applying the ZTF survey metadata and literature-derived selection functions within the forward-modeling pipeline; no tuning was performed to match the observed redshift distribution. This agreement with prior studies therefore provides an independent check on the accuracy of the end-to-end simulation. We will add explicit language in the validation section clarifying the fixed, independent nature of the inputs and the resulting completeness assessment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; validation uses independent external data.

full rationale

The paper presents the LightCurveLynx framework and validates it by generating simulations from survey metadata, SN population models, and selection effects drawn from literature sources, then directly comparing the output distributions and noise properties to the independent ZTF SN Ia DR2 observations via KL divergence and Hubble diagram. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce any claimed result to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition by construction; the agreement is tested against external observed quantities rather than internal model outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are specified in the abstract; the work relies on standard supernova population models and survey metadata inputs from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5533 in / 1057 out tokens · 68394 ms · 2026-05-10T17:37:40.399745+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    c֭ _,E4 .^,_ ՛o ٬5-[hѪR͛t *X,Y dSN駟 ғO>UF z7u 'g*=zdz|=88X 4H ʲ_ bnuG

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    2017

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Amenouche, M., Smith, M., Rosnet, P., et al. 2025, title ZTF SN Ia DR2: Simulations and volume-limited sample, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 694, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452134

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452134 2025

  5. [5]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, title Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  6. [6]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, title The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  7. [7]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, title The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package , , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  8. [8]

    2023, title sfdmap2: E(B-V) values from SFD dust map data, , 0.2.2 https://github.com/AmpelAstro/sfdmap2

    Barbary, K., & AmpelAstro . 2023, title sfdmap2: E(B-V) values from SFD dust map data, , 0.2.2 https://github.com/AmpelAstro/sfdmap2

    2023

  9. [9]

    2016, title SNCosmo: Python library for supernova cosmology , 10.5281/zenodo.592747

    Barbary , K., Bailey , S., Barentsen , G., et al. 2016, title SNCosmo: Python library for supernova cosmology , 10.5281/zenodo.592747

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.592747 2016

  10. [10]

    and Jones, David O

    Barbary, K., Bailey, S., Barentsen, G., et al. 2025, title SNCosmo, , v2.12.1 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.15019859

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15019859 2025

  11. [11]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, title The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131, 018002, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  12. [12]

    M., Grayling, M., Thorp, S., & Mandel, K

    Boyd, B. M., Grayling, M., Thorp, S., & Mandel, K. S. 2024, title Accounting for Selection Effects in Supernova Cosmology with Simulation-Based Inference and Hierarchical Bayesian Modelling, arXiv preprint. 2407.15923

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    F., Kalmbach, J

    Crenshaw, J. F., Kalmbach, J. B., Gagliano, A., et al. 2024, title Probabilistic Forward Modeling of Galaxy Catalogs with Normalizing Flows, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 80, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad54bf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad54bf 2024

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Dekany, R. G., Smith, R. M., Riddle, R., et al. 2020, title The Zwicky Transient Facility: Observing System, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 132, 038001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab4ca2

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab4ca2 2020

  15. [15]

    2010, title Measurements of the Rate of Type Ia Supernovae at Redshift lsim0.3 from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey II Supernova Survey , , 713, 1026, 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/1026

    Dilday , B., Smith , M., Bassett , B., et al. 2010, title Measurements of the Rate of Type Ia Supernovae at Redshift lsim0.3 from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey II Supernova Survey , , 713, 1026, 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/1026

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/713/2/1026 2010

  16. [16]

    in prep, title ELAsTiCC ,

    ELAsTiCC Team . in prep, title ELAsTiCC ,

  17. [17]

    Fitzpatrick , E. L. 1999, title Correcting for the Effects of Interstellar Extinction , , 111, 63, 10.1086/316293

    work page doi:10.1086/316293 1999

  18. [18]

    E., et al

    Frohmaier, C., Sullivan, M., Nugent, P. E., et al. 2019, title The volumetric rate of normal type Ia supernovae in the local Universe discovered by the Palomar Transient Factory, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 2308, 10.1093/mnras/stz807

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz807 2019

  19. [19]

    2021, title GHOST: Using Only Host Galaxy Information to Accurately Associate and Distinguish Supernovae , , 908, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd02b

    Gagliano , A., Narayan , G., Engel , A., Carrasco Kind , M., & LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration . 2021, title GHOST: Using Only Host Galaxy Information to Accurately Associate and Distinguish Supernovae , , 908, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd02b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd02b 2021

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Ginolin , M., Rigault , M., Copin , Y., et al. 2025, title ZTF SN Ia DR2: Colour standardisation of type Ia supernovae and its dependence on the environment , , 694, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450943

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450943 2025

  21. [21]

    Gordon, K. D. 2024, title dust_extinction: Interstellar Dust Extinction Models, Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023, 10.21105/joss.07023

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.07023 2024

  22. [22]

    R., et al

    Gris, P., Awan, H., Becker, M. R., et al. 2024, title A Cohesive Deep Drilling Field Strategy for LSST Cosmology, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 275, 21, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad79f5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad79f5 2024

  23. [23]

    R., Kuhlmann , S., Kovacs , E., et al

    Gupta, R. R., Kuhlmann, S., Kovacs, E., et al. 2016, title Host Galaxy Identification for Supernova Surveys, The Astronomical Journal, 152, 154, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/154

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/154 2016

  24. [24]

    2007, , 466, 11, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930

    Guy, J., Astier, P., Baumont, S., et al. 2007, title SALT2: using distant supernovae to improve the use of Type Ia supernovae as distance indicators, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 466, 11, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066930 2007

  25. [25]

    Guy, J., Sullivan, M., Conley, A., et al. 2010, title The Supernova Legacy Survey 3-year sample: Type Ia Supernovae photometric distances and cosmological constraints, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 523, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014468

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014468 2010

  26. [26]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, title Array programming with NumPy , Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  27. [27]

    I., Ponder, K

    Hlozek, R., Malz, A. I., Ponder, K. A., et al. 2023, title Results of the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC), The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 267, 25, 10.3847/1538-4365/accd6a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/accd6a 2023

  28. [28]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, title Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  29. [29]

    Ivezi ´c, S

    Ivezi \'c , Z ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, title LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products, The Astrophysical Journal, 873, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c 2019

  30. [30]

    2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.03087

    Jennings, E., Wolf, R., & Sako, M. 2016, title A new approach for obtaining cosmological constraints from Type Ia Supernovae using Approximate Bayesian Computation, arXiv preprint. 1611.03087

    work page arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Johansson , J., Thomas , D., Pforr , J., et al. 2013, title SN Ia host galaxy properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II spectroscopy , , 435, 1680, 10.1093/mnras/stt1408

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1408 2013

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Kenworthy, W. D., Jones, D. O., Dai, M., et al. 2021, title SALT3: An Improved Type Ia Supernova Model for Measuring Cosmic Distances, The Astrophysical Journal, 923, 265, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac30d8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac30d8 2021

  33. [33]

    Kessler, R., & Scolnic, D. 2017, title Correcting Type Ia Supernova Distances for Selection Biases and Contamination in Photometrically Identified Samples, The Astrophysical Journal, 836, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/56

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/56 2017

  34. [34]

    P., Cinabro, D., et al

    Kessler, R., Bernstein, J. P., Cinabro, D., et al. 2009, title SNANA: A Public Software Package for Supernova Analysis, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 185, 32, 10.1088/0067-0049/185/1/32

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/185/1/32 2009

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Kessler, R., Bassett, B. A., Belov, P., et al. 2010, title Results from the Supernova Photometric Classification Challenge, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 122, 1415, 10.1086/657607

    work page doi:10.1086/657607 2010

  36. [36]

    Kessler, R., Narayan, G., Avelino, A., et al. 2019, title Models and Simulations for the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time Series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC), Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131, 094501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab26f1

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab26f1 2019

  37. [37]

    Kubica et al. , J. in prep, title LightCurveLynx ,

  38. [38]

    2025, title nested-pandas: Efficient Pandas Representation for Nested Associated Datasets, , 0.6.8 https://github.com/lincc-frameworks/nested-pandas

    LINCC Frameworks . 2025, title nested-pandas: Efficient Pandas Representation for Nested Associated Datasets, , 0.6.8 https://github.com/lincc-frameworks/nested-pandas

    2025

  39. [39]

    2018, title Optimizing the LSST Observing Strategy for Dark Energy Science: DESC Recommendations for the Wide--Fast--Deep Survey, arXiv preprint

    Lochner, M., Scolnic, D., Awan, H., et al. 2018, title Optimizing the LSST Observing Strategy for Dark Energy Science: DESC Recommendations for the Wide--Fast--Deep Survey, arXiv preprint

    2018

  40. [40]

    2023, title The simulated catalogue of optical transients and correlated hosts (SCOTCH) , , 520, 2887, 10.1093/mnras/stad302

    Lokken , M., Gagliano , A., Narayan , G., et al. 2023, title The simulated catalogue of optical transients and correlated hosts (SCOTCH) , , 520, 2887, 10.1093/mnras/stad302

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad302 2023

  41. [41]

    LSST Science Book, Version 2.0

    LSST Science Collaborations and LSST Project . 2009, LSST Science Book, Version 2.0. 0912.0201

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  42. [42]

    https://doi.org/10

    pandas development team, T. 2020, title pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, , latest Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3509134 2020

  43. [43]

    2011, title Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in P ython, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, title Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in P ython, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    2011

  44. [44]

    A., Fremling, C., Sollerman, J., et al

    Perley, D. A., Fremling, C., Sollerman, J., et al. 2020, title The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. II. A Public Statistical Sample for Exploring Supernova Demographics, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbd98

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd98 2020

  45. [45]

    Phillips , M. M. 1993, title The Absolute Magnitudes of Type Ia Supernovae, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 413, L105, 10.1086/186970

    work page doi:10.1086/186970 1993

  46. [46]

    G., Press , W

    Riess , A. G., Press , W. H., & Kirshner , R. P. 1996, title Improved Distances to Type Ia Supernovae with Multicolor Light-Curve Shapes, Astrophysical Journal, 473, 88, 10.1086/178129

    work page doi:10.1086/178129 1996

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Rigault, M., Smith, M., Goobar, A., et al. 2025, title ZTF SN Ia DR2: Overview, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 694, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450388

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450388 2025

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Rigault , M., Smith , M., Regnault , N., et al. 2025, title ZTF SN Ia DR2: Study of Type Ia supernova light-curve fits , , 694, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450377

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450377 2025

  49. [49]

    M., Vincenzi, M., Hounsell, R., et al

    Rose, B. M., Vincenzi, M., Hounsell, R., et al. 2025, title The Hourglass Simulation: A Catalog for the Roman High-Latitude Time-Domain Core Community Survey, The Astrophysical Journal, 988, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ade1d6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade1d6 2025

  50. [50]

    Sarin, N., Hübner, M., Omand, C. M. B., et al. 2024, title redback: a Bayesian inference software package for electromagnetic transients, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 531, 1203, 10.1093/mnras/stae1238

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1238 2024

  51. [51]

    and Finkbeiner, Douglas P

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, title Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD , , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/103 2011

  52. [52]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Davis , M. 1998, title Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds , , 500, 525, 10.1086/305772

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/305772 1998

  53. [53]

    Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

    Spergel , D., Gehrels , N., Baltay , C., et al. 2015, title Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1503.03757, 10.48550/arXiv.1503.03757

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03757 2015

  54. [54]

    2011, MNRAS, 411, 955, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17731.x

    Sullivan , M., Conley , A., Howell , D. A., et al. 2010, title The dependence of Type Ia Supernovae luminosities on their host galaxies , , 406, 782, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16731.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16731.x 2010

  55. [55]

    1998, title A two-parameter luminosity correction for Type Ia supernovae, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 331, 815

    Tripp, R. 1998, title A two-parameter luminosity correction for Type Ia supernovae, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 331, 815. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...331..815T

    1998

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Vincenzi, M., Brout, D., Armstrong, P., et al. 2024, title The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: Cosmological Analysis and Systematic Uncertainties, The Astrophysical Journal, 975, 86, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e6c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e6c 2024

  57. [57]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, title SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  58. [58]

    2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed

    W es M c K inney. 2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed. S t\'efan van der W alt & J arrod M illman, 56 -- 61, 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a

    work page doi:10.25080/majora-92bf1922-00a 2010

  59. [59]

    Weyant, A., Schafer, C., & Wood-Vasey, W. M. 2013, title Likelihood-Free Cosmological Inference with Type Ia Supernovae: Approximate Bayesian Computation for a Complete Treatment of Uncertainty, The Astrophysical Journal, 764, 116, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/116

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/116 2013