arxiv: 2604.07689 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Symmetry-guided and AI-accelerated design of intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides for antiferromagnetic spintronics

Yu Pang , Yue Gu , Runsheng Zhong , Liyang Zou , Xiaobin Chen , Xiaolong Zou , Wenhui Duan

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords intercalated transition metal dichalcogenidesaltermagnetsantiferromagnetic spintronicsgraph neural networkssymmetry-guided designspin-orbit torqueEdelstein effect

0 comments

The pith

Symmetry-guided AI framework identifies 55 antiferromagnetic candidates in intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a symmetry-guided AI-accelerated framework to overcome the configurational complexity in discovering materials for antiferromagnetic spintronics. It employs graph neural networks with transfer learning from only 200 relaxed structures to explore more than 100,000 partially intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide configurations. This identifies 35 altermagnetic and 20 Tτ-antiferromagnetic ground-state candidates. The work demonstrates that tuning spin-group symmetry via intercalant arrangement or magnetic ordering can create d-wave altermagnets with high spin-charge conversion efficiency and Tτ-antiferromagnets with giant T-odd spin Edelstein susceptibilities for efficient Néel spin-orbit torque switching.

Core claim

Based on fully intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides and using only 200 relaxed partially intercalated structures for transfer learning, our model effectively explores more than 100,000 partially intercalated configurations and identifies 35 altermagnetic and 20 Tτ-antiferromagnetic ground-state candidates. Tuning spin-group symmetry through intercalant arrangement or magnetic ordering realizes a series of d-wave altermagnets in these hexagonal systems with high spin-charge conversion efficiency. Furthermore, we reveal plentiful Tτ-antiferromagnets enabling efficient Néel spin-orbit torque switching, driven by giant T-odd spin Edelstein susceptibilities.

What carries the argument

Graph neural network with transfer learning that generalizes to predict ground-state magnetic orderings, symmetries, and spintronic properties across more than 100,000 unexplored configurations.

If this is right

iTMDs establish as a versatile platform for spintronics.
A series of d-wave altermagnets with high spin-charge conversion efficiency can be realized.
Plentiful Tτ-antiferromagnets enable efficient Néel spin-orbit torque switching driven by giant T-odd spin Edelstein susceptibilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This framework could be extended to accelerate discovery in other classes of materials with large configurational spaces.
Experimental synthesis and testing of the identified candidates would validate the predictions and the generalization ability of the model.
Similar approaches might help in designing materials with targeted symmetries for various quantum technologies.

Load-bearing premise

The graph neural network with transfer learning from only 200 structures generalizes accurately to predict properties for over 100,000 configurations without substantial errors.

What would settle it

Full first-principles calculations on a representative sample of the predicted candidates to verify if the magnetic orderings and symmetries match the AI model's outputs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07689 by Liyang Zou, Runsheng Zhong, Wenhui Duan, Xiaobin Chen, Xiaolong Zou, Yue Gu, Yu Pang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: A symmetry-guided and AI-accelerated workflow for discovering target magnetic phases in iTMDs. a, Schematic configurations in both T- and Hphases considering different stacking orders and intercalation positions including octahedral, tetrahedral, and trigonal prismatic sites. b, The screening workflow adopted to identify stable altermagnetic and T τ -antiferromagnetic ground states, by combining firstp… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: A d-wave altermagnet with significant spin-splitter conductivity. a, Crystal and magnetic structure of the d-wave altermagnet candidate H-AA’-octa FeCrS2. b, Schematic showing the breaking of the C3 rotational symmetry by intralayer antiferromagnetic order of the Cr atoms . c, The first Brillouin zone. The blue plane at constant kz and the pink plane at constant ky correspond to the momentum-space cuts fo… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: An electrically switchable T τ -AFMs with a strong spin Edelstein effect. a, Crystal and magnetic structures of the T τ -symmetric AFM candidate, T-AB’- tetra 2 Fe-WS2. The two symmetry-related magnetic Fe atoms in the unit cell are labeled as Fe1 and Fe2. b, Relativistic band structure calculated with SOC, revealing a metallic ground state. c, d, Calculated components of the local spin Edelstein effect su… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Machine-learning-accelerated discovery of target magnetic phases in partially iTMDs. a, The hierarchical screening for stable partially iTMDs AM or T τ -AFM from a vast configuration space of ˜102,000 compositions. b, Statistical performance of our ML model. The bar chart displays the mean absolute error (MAE, cyan) and coefficient of determination (R2 , pink) for the model. c, f, Predicted stable crystal … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The advancement of antiferromagnetic spintronics depends on quantum materials with target symmetry-dictated functionalities, however, their systematic discovery is hindered by the immense configurational complexity of the available material space. Here, we introduce a symmetry-guided, AI-accelerated framework incorporating graph neural networks with high generalization ability to overcome this bottleneck. Based on fully intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides (iTMDs) and using only 200 relaxed partially intercalated structures for transfer learning, our model effectively explores more than 100,000 partially intercalated configurations and identifies 35 altermagnetic and 20 $T\tau$-antiferromagnetic ground-state candidates. Interestingly, we show that tuning spin-group symmetry through intercalant arrangement or magnetic ordering realizes a series of d-wave altermagnets in these hexagonal systems with high spin-charge conversion efficiency. Furthermore, we reveal plentiful $T\tau$-antiferromagnets enabling efficient N\'eel spin-orbit torque switching, driven by giant $T$-odd spin Edelstein susceptibilities. These results establish iTMDs as a versatile platform for spintronics and provide a general strategy for the accelerated design of symmetry-enforced quantum materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper uses transfer learning on a GNN from 200 structures to screen 100k iTMD configurations and flags 55 antiferromagnetic candidates with tuned spintronic properties, but the generalization step lacks reported validation.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work combines symmetry constraints with a graph neural network to handle the huge number of possible intercalant arrangements in transition metal dichalcogenides. Starting from only 200 relaxed partially intercalated structures for transfer learning, the model scans more than 100,000 configurations and identifies 35 altermagnetic and 20 Tτ-antiferromagnetic ground-state candidates. It then points to ways of arranging intercalants or magnetic order to produce d-wave altermagnets with high spin-charge conversion efficiency and Tτ-antiferromagnets with large T-odd spin Edelstein susceptibilities that could support efficient Néel spin-orbit torque switching. That scale of exploration and the concrete candidate counts are the clearest advance over earlier screening efforts in this family of materials. The approach also makes sense for the problem: symmetry rules shrink the space that needs to be checked, and the focus on iTMDs leverages an already tunable platform. The soft spot is the validation of the model itself. The claims rest on the GNN generalizing accurately from the small training set to the full 100k space for magnetic order, symmetry classification, and property values, yet the available description gives no hold-out errors, uncertainty estimates, or follow-up DFT checks on the selected candidates. Without those, it is hard to gauge how many of the 55 materials might be false positives. This paper is for computational researchers who work on AI-driven discovery of spintronic or altermagnetic materials and want a reusable pipeline for configurational screening. A reader who needs new candidate lists or a template for symmetry-guided ML will get practical value, even if they plan to verify the top hits themselves. It deserves a serious referee because the method is timely, the target application is well-defined, and the specific numbers make the claims checkable. I would send it out for review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a symmetry-guided, AI-accelerated framework that employs graph neural networks with transfer learning from 200 relaxed partially intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide (iTMD) structures to screen more than 100,000 configurations. It identifies 35 altermagnetic and 20 Tτ-antiferromagnetic ground-state candidates, showing that intercalant arrangement or magnetic ordering can tune spin-group symmetry to realize d-wave altermagnets with high spin-charge conversion efficiency and Tτ-antiferromagnets with giant T-odd spin Edelstein susceptibilities suitable for efficient Néel spin-orbit torque switching.

Significance. If the GNN predictions and symmetry assignments are reliable, the work offers a scalable strategy for navigating vast configurational spaces in quantum materials discovery, directly yielding concrete candidate lists for antiferromagnetic spintronics. The explicit linkage of spin-group symmetry tuning to measurable efficiencies (spin-charge conversion, Edelstein susceptibilities) provides falsifiable predictions and a template for symmetry-enforced design that could be adopted beyond iTMDs.

major comments (2)

[Results] Results section (paragraph on screening outcomes): The central claim that the model identifies 35 altermagnetic and 20 Tτ-antiferromagnetic ground-state candidates from >100k configurations rests on GNN predictions, yet no hold-out test errors, uncertainty quantification, or DFT validation on any statistically meaningful subset of the screened or selected candidates is reported. This directly undermines in the candidate counts and the subsequent property assessments (e.g., spin Edelstein susceptibilities).
[Methods] Methods section (GNN and transfer-learning description): The transfer-learning procedure from only 200 relaxed structures to 100k unexplored configurations lacks explicit details on the magnetic ground-state determination protocol (energy minimization versus symmetry enforcement), data exclusion criteria, and cross-validation metrics. Without these, the generalization assumption required for the functional-candidate identification cannot be evaluated.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'high generalization ability' is stated without accompanying quantitative metrics (e.g., MAE or R² on a test set); this should be replaced by concrete performance numbers or removed.
[Abstract] Notation: The symbol Tτ for the antiferromagnetic class is introduced without an explicit definition or reference to its spin-group representation; a brief parenthetical or footnote would improve clarity for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and for recognizing the potential of our symmetry-guided AI framework for antiferromagnetic spintronics discovery. We address the major comments point by point below and will incorporate revisions to improve transparency and validation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results] Results section (paragraph on screening outcomes): The central claim that the model identifies 35 altermagnetic and 20 Tτ-antiferromagnetic ground-state candidates from >100k configurations rests on GNN predictions, yet no hold-out test errors, uncertainty quantification, or DFT validation on any statistically meaningful subset of the screened or selected candidates is reported. This directly undermines in the candidate counts and the subsequent property assessments (e.g., spin Edelstein susceptibilities).

Authors: We agree that quantitative validation metrics are necessary to support confidence in the large-scale screening results. The GNN was trained via transfer learning on the 200 DFT-relaxed structures, with internal performance assessed during training, but explicit hold-out test errors, uncertainty estimates for the extrapolated 100k+ configurations, and post-screening DFT validation on candidates were not reported in the submitted manuscript. In the revised version, we will add these details: model test-set errors and uncertainty quantification (via ensemble variance or similar) in the Methods/Results, plus DFT validation on a representative subset of at least 20-30 predicted candidates to confirm magnetic ground states, altermagnetism/Tτ ordering, and key properties such as spin Edelstein susceptibilities. These additions will be placed in the main text or a new SI section, directly bolstering the reported candidate counts. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods] Methods section (GNN and transfer-learning description): The transfer-learning procedure from only 200 relaxed structures to 100k unexplored configurations lacks explicit details on the magnetic ground-state determination protocol (energy minimization versus symmetry enforcement), data exclusion criteria, and cross-validation metrics. Without these, the generalization assumption required for the functional-candidate identification cannot be evaluated.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for greater methodological detail. Magnetic ground states in the 200-structure training set were obtained via full spin-polarized DFT energy minimization over multiple initial spin configurations (collinear FM/AFM and non-collinear), not by symmetry enforcement. Data exclusion removed structures exhibiting DFT non-convergence or unphysical intercalant placements (e.g., interatomic distances below a defined cutoff), with the exact numbers and criteria to be quantified. Cross-validation used 5-fold stratified CV on the training data. We will expand the Methods section to explicitly describe the ground-state protocol, exclusion criteria with counts, and CV metrics (including MAE/R² for energies and moments). This will enable readers to evaluate the generalization to the screened space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper trains a graph neural network via transfer learning on 200 external DFT-relaxed structures and applies it to predict properties across >100k new configurations. This is a standard supervised ML workflow whose outputs are not equivalent to the training inputs by construction, nor do any quoted steps reduce via self-definition, fitted-parameter renaming, or self-citation chains. The central claims rest on generalization from independent DFT data rather than tautological re-labeling of inputs, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained, non-circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the transferability of the GNN model and the assumption that symmetry rules map directly to functional spintronic behaviors; the 200-structure training set size is a chosen hyperparameter, and domain assumptions about symmetry enforcement are invoked without independent proof in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

Training set size (200 structures)
Chosen number of relaxed partially intercalated structures used for transfer learning; affects model generalization to the 100k configurations.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Spin-group symmetry through intercalant arrangement or magnetic ordering dictates altermagnetic and Tτ-antiferromagnetic functionalities
Invoked to guide candidate identification and to claim high spin-charge conversion efficiency and giant T-odd spin Edelstein susceptibilities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1559 out tokens · 91956 ms · 2026-05-10T18:27:02.686673+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

tuning spin-group symmetry through intercalant arrangement or magnetic ordering realizes a series of d-wave altermagnets

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

[1]

Jungwirth, X

T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic Spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol.11(3), 231–241 (2016), doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.18

work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.18 2016
[2]

Baltz,et al., Antiferromagnetic Spintronics.Rev

V. Baltz,et al., Antiferromagnetic Spintronics.Rev. Mod. Phys.90(1), 015005 (2018), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015005 2018
[3]

J. Han, R. Cheng, L. Liu, H. Ohno, S. Fukami, Coherent Antiferromagnetic Spin- tronics.Nat. Mater.22(6), 684–695 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01492-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01492-6 2023
[5]

ˇZelezn´ y,et al., Spin-Orbit Torques in Locally and Globally Noncentrosymmetric Crystals: Antiferromagnets and Ferromagnets.Phys

J. ˇZelezn´ y,et al., Spin-Orbit Torques in Locally and Globally Noncentrosymmetric Crystals: Antiferromagnets and Ferromagnets.Phys. Rev. B95(1), 014403 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014403

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.014403 2017
[6]

Manchon,et al., Current-Induced Spin-Orbit Torques in Ferromagnetic and Antiferromagnetic Systems.Rev

A. Manchon,et al., Current-Induced Spin-Orbit Torques in Ferromagnetic and Antiferromagnetic Systems.Rev. Mod. Phys.91(3), 035004 (2019), doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.91.035004

2019
[7]

Šmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Anti- ferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry. Phys. Rev. X12(3), 031042 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031042

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031042 2022
[8]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermag- netism.Phys. Rev. X12(4), 040501 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040501. 15

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.040501 2022
[9]

L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, A. Zunger, Giant Momentum- Dependent Spin Splitting in Centrosymmetric Low-ZAntiferromagnets.Phys. Rev. B102(1), 014422 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014422

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.014422 2020
[10]

C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, S.-C. Zhang, Fermi Liquid Instabilities in the Spin Channel.Phys. Rev. B75(11), 115103 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.115103

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.115103 2007
[11]

Ma,et al., Multifunctional Antiferromagnetic Materials with Giant Piezomag- netism and Noncollinear Spin Current.Nat

H.-Y. Ma,et al., Multifunctional Antiferromagnetic Materials with Giant Piezomag- netism and Noncollinear Spin Current.Nat. Commun.12(1), 2846 (2021), doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23127-7

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23127-7 2021
[12]

Shao, S.-H

D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-Neutral Currents for Spintronics.Nat. Commun.12(1), 7061 (2021), doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26915-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26915-3 2021
[13]

Bai,et al., Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintron- ics.Adv

L. Bai,et al., Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintron- ics.Adv. Funct. Mater.p. 2409327 (2024), doi:10.1002/adfm.202409327

work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202409327 2024
[14]

Krempask´ y,et al., Altermagnetic Lifting of Kramers Spin Degeneracy.Nature 626(7999), 517–522 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7

J. Krempask´ y,et al., Altermagnetic Lifting of Kramers Spin Degeneracy.Nature 626(7999), 517–522 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7 2024
[15]

R. Xu, Y. Gao, J. Liu, Chemical Design of Monolayer Altermagnets.Natl. Sci. Rev. 13(2), nwaf528 (2026), doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf528

work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf528 2026
[16]

Gao,et al., AI-accelerated Discovery of Altermagnetic Materials.Natl

Z.-F. Gao,et al., AI-accelerated Discovery of Altermagnetic Materials.Natl. Sci. Rev.12(4), nwaf066 (2025), doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf066

work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf066 2025
[17]

Y. Che, H. Lv, X. Wu, J. Yang, Engineering Altermagnetic States in Two- Dimensional Square Tessellations.Phys. Rev. Lett.135(3), 036701 (2025), doi: 10.1103/v38b-5by1

work page doi:10.1103/v38b-5by1 2025
[18]

Liu,et al., Robust Altermagnetism and Compensated Ferrimagnetism in MnPX 3 -Based ( X = S or Se) Heterostructures.Phys

Y. Liu,et al., Robust Altermagnetism and Compensated Ferrimagnetism in MnPX 3 -Based ( X = S or Se) Heterostructures.Phys. Rev. Mater.9(10), 104406 (2025), doi:10.1103/6wmg-hxdq. 16

work page doi:10.1103/6wmg-hxdq 2025
[19]

Guo,et al., Tunable Altermagnetism via Interchain Engineering in Parallel- Assembled Atomic Chains.Phys

D. Guo,et al., Tunable Altermagnetism via Interchain Engineering in Parallel- Assembled Atomic Chains.Phys. Rev. B112(4), L041404 (2025), doi:10.1103/ zhds-vnyt

2025
[20]

Final result of the ma- jorana demonstrator’s search for neutrinoless double-β decay in 76Ge (2023)

R. He,et al., Nonrelativistic Spin-Momentum Coupling in Antiferromagnetic Twisted Bilayers.Phys. Rev. Lett.130(4), 046401 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130. 046401

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130 2023
[21]

Y. Liu, J. Yu, C.-C. Liu, Twisted Magnetic Van Der Waals Bilayers: An Ideal Platform for Altermagnetism.Phys. Rev. Lett.133(20), 206702 (2024), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.206702

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.206702 2024
[22]

Zeng, Y.-J

S. Zeng, Y.-J. Zhao, Description of Two-Dimensional Altermagnetism: Catego- rization Using Spin Group Theory.Phys. Rev. B110(5), 054406 (2024), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.054406

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.054406 2024
[23]

Pan,et al., General Stacking Theory for Altermagnetism in Bilayer Systems.Phys

B. Pan,et al., General Stacking Theory for Altermagnetism in Bilayer Systems.Phys. Rev. Lett.133(16), 166701 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.166701

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.166701 2024
[24]

S. G. Jeong,et al., Altermagnetic Polar Metallic Phase in Ultrathin Epitaxially Strained RuO 2 Films.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A123(10), e2526641123 (2026), doi:10.1073/pnas.2526641123

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2526641123 2026
[25]

Bai,et al., Efficient Spin-to-Charge Conversion via Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Effect in Antiferromagnet RuO 2.Phys

H. Bai,et al., Efficient Spin-to-Charge Conversion via Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Effect in Antiferromagnet RuO 2.Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216701 (2023), doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.216701

2023
[26]

Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez,et al., Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrel- ativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism.Phys

R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez,et al., Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrel- ativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism.Phys. Rev. Lett.126(12), 127701 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.127701

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.127701 2021
[27]

Lai,et al., D -Wave Flat Fermi Surface in Altermagnets Enables Maximum Charge- to-Spin Conversion.Phys

J. Lai,et al., D -Wave Flat Fermi Surface in Altermagnets Enables Maximum Charge- to-Spin Conversion.Phys. Rev. Lett.135(25), 256702 (2025), doi:10.1103/bf1n-sxdl. 17

work page doi:10.1103/bf1n-sxdl 2025
[28]

ˇSmejkal, R

L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, Crystal Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking and Spontaneous Hall Effect in Collinear Antiferromagnets.Sci. Adv.(2020), doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809 2020
[29]

Pan,et al., Experimental Evidence of N´ eel-Order-Driven Magneto-optical Kerr Effect in an Altermagnetic Insulator.Phys

H. Pan,et al., Experimental Evidence of N´ eel-Order-Driven Magneto-optical Kerr Effect in an Altermagnetic Insulator.Phys. Rev. Lett.136(3), 036701 (2026), doi: 10.1103/q8ym-l2zt

work page doi:10.1103/q8ym-l2zt 2026
[30]

Liu, J.-T

M. Liu, J.-T. Sun, S. Meng, Uncompensated Linear Dichroism of Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect in a 2D Altermagnet.Adv. Funct. Mater.p. e21111 (2025), doi:10.1002/ adfm.202521111

2025
[31]

Y. Li, Y. Liu, C.-C. Liu, Unconventional Magneto-Optical Effects in Altermagnets (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.03435

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03435 2025
[32]

Huang,et al., Spin Inversion Enforced by Crystal Symmetry in Ferroelastic Al- termagnets.Phys

Y. Huang,et al., Spin Inversion Enforced by Crystal Symmetry in Ferroelastic Al- termagnets.Phys. Rev. Lett.135(26), 266701 (2025), doi:10.1103/jql2-b4c4

work page doi:10.1103/jql2-b4c4 2025
[33]

N. Ding, H. Ye, S.-S. Wang, S. Dong, Ferroelastically Tunable Altermagnets.Phys. Rev. B112(22), L220410 (2025), doi:10.1103/m33v-xwn3

work page doi:10.1103/m33v-xwn3 2025
[34]

Duan,et al., Antiferroelectric Altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity Alters Magnets

X. Duan,et al., Antiferroelectric Altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity Alters Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett.134(10) (2025), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.106801

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.106801 2025
[35]

Gu,et al., Ferroelectric Switchable Altermagnetism.Phys

M. Gu,et al., Ferroelectric Switchable Altermagnetism.Phys. Rev. Lett.134(10), 106802 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.106802

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.106802 2025
[36]

W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, S. Huang, Z. Cheng, A Unified Symmetry Framework for Spin–Ferroelectric Coupling in Altermagnetic Multiferroics.Nat. Commun.(2026), doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69635-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69635-2 2026
[37]

Li,et al., Ferrovalley Physics in Stacked Bilayer Altermagnetic Systems.Nano Letters25(15), 6032–6039 (2025), doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06037

Y.-Q. Li,et al., Ferrovalley Physics in Stacked Bilayer Altermagnetic Systems.Nano Letters25(15), 6032–6039 (2025), doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06037

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06037 2025
[38]

Chen,et al., Enumeration and Representation Theory of Spin Space Groups

X. Chen,et al., Enumeration and Representation Theory of Spin Space Groups. Phys. Rev. X14(3), 031038 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.031038. 18

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.031038 2024
[39]

Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classifica- tion and Applications.Phys. Rev. X14(3), 031037 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX. 14.031037

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx 2024
[40]

Jiang,et al., Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symmetries of Magnetic Orders.Phys

Y. Jiang,et al., Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symmetries of Magnetic Orders.Phys. Rev. X14(3), 031039 (2024), doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.14.031039

2024
[41]

B. Li, L. Zheng, Y. Gong, P. Kang, Intercalation-Driven Tunability in Two- Dimensional Layered Materials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications.Mater. To- day81, 118–136 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2024.10.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2024.10.002 2024
[42]

Zhao,et al., Engineering Covalently Bonded 2D Layered Materials by Self- Intercalation.Nature581(7807), 171–177 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2241-9

X. Zhao,et al., Engineering Covalently Bonded 2D Layered Materials by Self- Intercalation.Nature581(7807), 171–177 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2241-9

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2241-9 2020
[43]

Zhou,et al., A cation-exchange approach to tunable magnetic intercalation super- lattices.Naturepp

J. Zhou,et al., A cation-exchange approach to tunable magnetic intercalation super- lattices.Naturepp. 1–8 (2025)

2025
[44]

Takagi,et al., Spontaneous Topological Hall Effect Induced by Non-Coplanar Antiferromagnetic Order in Intercalated van Der Waals Materials.Nat

H. Takagi,et al., Spontaneous Topological Hall Effect Induced by Non-Coplanar Antiferromagnetic Order in Intercalated van Der Waals Materials.Nat. Phys.19(7), 961–968 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02017-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02017-3 2023
[45]

Manzeli, D

S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, A. Kis, 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides.Nat. Rev. Mater.2(8), 17033 (2017), doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017. 33

work page doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017 2017
[46]

Chhowalla,et al., The Chemistry of Two-Dimensional Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanosheets.Nat

M. Chhowalla,et al., The Chemistry of Two-Dimensional Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanosheets.Nat. Chem.5(4), 263–275 (2013), doi:10.1038/nchem. 1589

work page doi:10.1038/nchem 2013
[47]

Sprague,et al., Observation of Altermagnetic Spin Splitting in an Intercalated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.12985

M. Sprague,et al., Observation of Altermagnetic Spin Splitting in an Intercalated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.12985

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.12985 2025
[48]

arXiv:2411.18761 (2024)

N. Dale,et al., Non-Relativistic Spin Splitting above and below the Fermi Level in a g-Wave Altermagnet (2024), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.18761. 19

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.18761 2024
[49]

J. N. Graham,et al., Local probe evidence supporting altermagnetism in Co 1/4NbSe2 (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.09193

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.09193 2025
[50]

A. P. Sakhya,et al., Electronic Structure of a Layered Altermagnetic Compound CoNb4Se8 (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.16670

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16670 2025
[51]

R. B. Regmi,et al., Altermagnetism in the Layered Intercalated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide CoNb 4Se8.Nat. Commun.16(1), 4399 (2025), doi:10.1038/ s41467-025-58642-4

2025
[52]

H. C. Mandujano,et al., Evolution of Altermagnetism to Spin Density Waves in Co x NbSe2.J. Am. Chem. Soc.147(49), 44926–44940 (2025), doi:10.1021/jacs.5c13085

work page doi:10.1021/jacs.5c13085 2025
[53]

N. L. Nair,et al., Electrical Switching in a Magnetically Intercalated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide.Nat. Mater.19(2), 153–157 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0518-x

work page doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0518-x 2020
[54]

Liang,et al., Multi-Task Mixture Density Graph Neural Networks for Predicting Catalyst Performance.Adv

C. Liang,et al., Multi-Task Mixture Density Graph Neural Networks for Predicting Catalyst Performance.Adv. Funct. Mater.34(45), 2404392 (2024)

2024
[55]

M. Q. Dong, Z.-X. Guo, X.-G. Gong, Field-Free Perpendicular Magnetization Switch- ing by Altermagnet with Collinear Spin Current (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506. 10336

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506 2025
[56]

J. Tang, R. Cheng, Lossless Spin-Orbit Torque in Antiferromagnetic Topological Insulator MnBi2Te4.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 136701 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 132.136701

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2024
[57]

H. J. Zhao, L. Tao, Y. Fu, L. Bellaiche, Y. Ma, General Theory for Longitudinal Nonreciprocal Charge Transport.Phys. Rev. Lett.133(9), 096802 (2024), doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.133.096802

2024
[58]

Kaplan, T

D. Kaplan, T. Holder, B. Yan, Unification of Nonlinear Anomalous Hall Effect and Nonreciprocal Magnetoresistance in Metals by the Quantum Geometry.Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2), 026301 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.026301. 20

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.026301 2024
[59]

Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, P

R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, P. Ritzinger, K. V´ yborn´ y, J.ˇZelezn´ y, A. Manchon, Non- Relativistic Torque and Edelstein Effect in Non-Collinear Magnets.Nat. Commun. 15(1), 7663 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51565-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51565-6 2024
[60]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse, J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set.Phys. Rev. B54(16), 11169–11186 (1996), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 1996
[61]

Kresse, D

G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented- Wave Method.Phys. Rev. B59(3), 1758–1775 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.59. 1758

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.59 1999
[62]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple.Phys. Rev. Lett.77(18), 3865–3868 (1996), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77. 3865

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77 1996
[63]

S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study.Phys. Rev. B57, 1505–1509 (1998), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.57.1505 1998
[64]

H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations.Phys. Rev. B13(12), 5188 (1976)

1976
[65]

H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, FINDSYM: program for identifying the space-group symmetry of a crystal.J. Appl. Crystallogr.38(1), 237–238 (2005)

2005
[66]

Smolyanyuk, L

A. Smolyanyuk, L. ˇSmejkal, I. I. Mazin, A tool to check whether a symmetry- compensated collinear magnetic material is antiferro- or altermagnetic.SciPost Phys. Codebasesp. 30 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.30

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.30 2024
[67]

Pizzi,et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications.J

G. Pizzi,et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32(16), 165902 (2020). 21

2020
[68]

Pizzi, D

G. Pizzi, D. Volja, B. Kozinsky, M. Fornari, N. Marzari, BoltzWann: A code for the evaluation of thermoelectric and electronic transport properties with a maximally- localized Wannier functions basis.Comput. Phys. Commun.185(1), 422–429 (2014)

2014
[69]

ˇZelezn´ y, Wannier-linear-response code, Wannier-linear-response, doi:https:// bitbucket.org/zeleznyj/wannier-linear-response/src

J. ˇZelezn´ y, Wannier-linear-response code, Wannier-linear-response, doi:https:// bitbucket.org/zeleznyj/wannier-linear-response/src
[70]

Freimuth, S

F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, Y. Mokrousov, Spin-Orbit Torques in Co/Pt(111) and Mn/W(001) Magnetic Bilayers from First Principles.Phys. Rev. B90(17), 174423 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.174423

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.174423 2014
[71]

Li,et al., Intraband and Interband Spin-Orbit Torques in Noncentrosymmet- ric Ferromagnets.Phys

H. Li,et al., Intraband and Interband Spin-Orbit Torques in Noncentrosymmet- ric Ferromagnets.Phys. Rev. B91(13), 134402 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91. 134402. Acknowledgments Funding:This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 12474236), and the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (ZDSYS20230626091100001...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91 2015