pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08141 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Detecting Chiral Gravitational Wave Background with a Dipole Pulsar Timing Array

Baoyu Xu, Hanyu Jiang, Misao Sasaki, Rong-Gen Cai, Yun-Long Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords pulsar timing arraygravitational wave backgroundchiral gravitational wavesparity violationoverlap reduction functionnanohertzmicrohertzdipole configuration
0
0 comments X

The pith

A dipole pulsar timing array detects chiral gravitational wave backgrounds by isolating parity violation through overlap reduction functions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Conventional pulsar timing arrays cannot sense parity violation in gravitational wave backgrounds. This work introduces a dipole pulsar timing array whose overlap reduction functions, calculated from cross-correlated timing residuals, respond differently to left- and right-handed waves. The resulting sensitivity curves show that such an array could register chiral signals at nanohertz scales and push the upper frequency limit for background detection into the microhertz band. If realized, this would open a window on early-universe physics that breaks parity symmetry.

Core claim

By deriving the overlap reduction functions from the cross-correlation of timing signals in a dipole pulsar timing array, the system is shown to be sensitive to chiral gravitational wave backgrounds in the nanohertz regime, and numerical sensitivity curves confirm an extension of the detectable frequency range for gravitational wave backgrounds from nanohertz to microhertz.

What carries the argument

The dipole pulsar timing array configuration, using overlap reduction functions derived from cross-correlations of pulsar timing signals to isolate chiral components of the gravitational wave background.

If this is right

  • The dPTA enables detection of chiral GWBs at nanohertz frequencies inaccessible to conventional PTAs.
  • It broadens the GWB detection frequency range to include microhertz scales.
  • This configuration allows probing of parity-violating physics in the gravitational wave background through modified cross-correlation signals.
  • The method provides sensitivity curves that quantify the improved reach compared to standard arrays.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Reprocessing existing PTA datasets by selecting pulsar pairs with dipole-like separations could yield initial constraints on chiral signals without new observations.
  • The geometric approach might extend to other array symmetries for isolating different polarization states beyond chirality.
  • Successful detection would provide a ground-based complement to future space-based detectors operating at overlapping or higher frequencies.

Load-bearing premise

A practical dipole configuration of real pulsars can be achieved such that the overlap reduction functions isolate the chiral signal without being dominated by noise, systematics, or unaccounted correlations.

What would settle it

Numerical computation of the overlap reduction functions for a dipole geometry that shows no difference in response to chiral versus non-chiral waves, or pulsar timing data from dipole-like pairs whose measured correlations match only the standard PTA prediction without an extra chiral contribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08141 by Baoyu Xu, Hanyu Jiang, Misao Sasaki, Rong-Gen Cai, Yun-Long Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The diagram for dipole pulsar timing (dPTA). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The normalized ORF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Power-law sensitivity curves for the Stokes pa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Strain sensitivity curves for dPTA with obser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Power-law sensitivity curves for the dPTA, IPTA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The pulsar timing array (PTA) is a powerful technique for detecting nanohertz gravitational wave backgrounds (GWBs). However, conventional PTAs lack sensitivity to parity violation in the GWB. In this work, we propose a dipole pulsar timing array system (dPTA). By deriving the overlap reduction functions (ORFs) from the cross-correlation of timing signals, we find that this system exhibits sensitivity to chiral GWBs in the nanohertz regime. Furthermore, through numerical calculations of its sensitivity curves, we demonstrate that the dPTA extends the detectable frequency range of PTAs for GWBs from the nanohertz to the microhertz regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a dipole pulsar timing array (dPTA) to detect chiral (parity-violating) gravitational wave backgrounds (GWBs). It derives overlap reduction functions (ORFs) from cross-correlations of timing residuals for a dipole geometry of pulsars, claims this configuration is sensitive to chiral GWBs in the nanohertz regime, and presents numerical sensitivity curves showing an extension of the detectable GWB frequency range from nanohertz to microhertz.

Significance. If the ORF derivations and sensitivity calculations are correct, the work would provide a novel theoretical route to access parity-odd GWB signals inaccessible to standard PTAs, potentially enabling tests of early-universe parity violation or chiral astrophysical sources. The claimed frequency extension could bridge PTA and higher-frequency GW detectors, but this hinges on idealized assumptions about pulsar geometry and noise.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of ORFs (likely §3)] The central claim that the dPTA exhibits sensitivity to chiral GWBs rests on the derived ORFs isolating the parity-odd component. However, the manuscript provides no explicit expressions, assumptions (e.g., plane-wave approximation, Earth-term only or full), or validation against known PTA ORFs (such as Hellings-Downs), making independent verification of the chiral sensitivity impossible. This is load-bearing for the abstract's first result.
  2. [Sensitivity curves (likely §4)] The numerical sensitivity curves claim extension to the microhertz regime, but the calculation appears to omit realistic noise sources (timing errors, common-mode red noise, or unmodeled spatial correlations) and assumes an idealized dipole geometry. Given the uneven sky distribution of real millisecond pulsars, this undermines the practical extension claim without an error budget or Monte Carlo validation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states results without referencing any equations or figures; the manuscript should include at least one key ORF expression and a sensitivity plot in the abstract or introduction for clarity.
  2. [Introduction or §2] Notation for the dipole geometry (e.g., definition of the two-pulsar axis and polarization basis) should be introduced with a diagram to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript proposing the dipole pulsar timing array (dPTA) for detecting chiral gravitational wave backgrounds. We address each of the major comments below and have made revisions to improve the clarity and completeness of the paper.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Derivation of ORFs (likely §3)] The central claim that the dPTA exhibits sensitivity to chiral GWBs rests on the derived ORFs isolating the parity-odd component. However, the manuscript provides no explicit expressions, assumptions (e.g., plane-wave approximation, Earth-term only or full), or validation against known PTA ORFs (such as Hellings-Downs), making independent verification of the chiral sensitivity impossible. This is load-bearing for the abstract's first result.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit derivation of the ORFs is crucial for verifying the chiral sensitivity. In the original manuscript, the derivations were presented in §3 but perhaps not with sufficient detail on assumptions and comparisons. In the revised version, we will expand §3 to include the full mathematical expressions for the ORFs in the dipole geometry, specify the plane-wave approximation and the treatment of Earth and pulsar terms, and provide a direct comparison to the Hellings-Downs curve for the standard PTA case. This will enable independent verification. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sensitivity curves (likely §4)] The numerical sensitivity curves claim extension to the microhertz regime, but the calculation appears to omit realistic noise sources (timing errors, common-mode red noise, or unmodeled spatial correlations) and assumes an idealized dipole geometry. Given the uneven sky distribution of real millisecond pulsars, this undermines the practical extension claim without an error budget or Monte Carlo validation.

    Authors: We acknowledge the limitations in our sensitivity analysis. The calculations in §4 are intended to illustrate the potential of the dPTA under idealized conditions to highlight the frequency extension. In the revision, we will add a dedicated subsection discussing the assumptions, including the idealized dipole geometry, and provide an estimate of the impact of realistic noise sources such as timing errors and red noise. We will also note the challenges posed by the actual distribution of pulsars and suggest that full Monte Carlo simulations with real PTA data would be a valuable extension for future work. However, we maintain that the theoretical demonstration remains valid as a proof-of-concept. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: ORF derivation and sensitivity curves are independent first-principles calculations

full rationale

The paper proposes a dipole PTA geometry and derives overlap reduction functions directly from the cross-correlation of pulsar timing residuals induced by a chiral gravitational wave background. This follows standard PTA formalism (Hellings-Downs style integrals over the sky and polarization tensors) applied to the new dipole baseline, without any parameter fitting to data or redefinition of inputs as outputs. Numerical sensitivity curves are then obtained by integrating the derived ORFs against noise models and frequency bins, which is a standard forward computation rather than a statistical prediction forced by the fit. No self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or to smuggle an ansatz; the central claims rest on explicit geometry-dependent integrals that can be reproduced from the stated assumptions alone. The reader's assessment of score 1.0 is consistent with this self-contained structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on extending the standard mathematical framework for pulsar timing correlations to a new geometric arrangement; the dPTA itself is introduced as a new configuration without prior independent evidence.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard general-relativistic treatment of pulsar timing residuals and overlap reduction functions for gravitational wave backgrounds.
    Invoked as the foundation for deriving the new dipole ORFs.
invented entities (1)
  • Dipole pulsar timing array (dPTA) no independent evidence
    purpose: To achieve sensitivity to the chiral component of nanohertz gravitational wave backgrounds
    New geometric configuration proposed in the paper; no independent evidence outside this work is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5421 in / 1298 out tokens · 74213 ms · 2026-05-10T17:19:13.990046+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

  2. [2]

    A. D. Johnsonet al.(NANOGrav), NANOGrav 15-year gravitational-wave background methods, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103012 (2024), arXiv:2306.16223 [astro-ph.HE]

  3. [3]

    Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L11 (2023), [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)], arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

  4. [4]

    Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Mil- lisecond Pulsars, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L9 (2023), arXiv:2306.16217 [astro-ph.HE]

  5. [5]

    D. J. Reardonet al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pul- sar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

  6. [6]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA), Astron

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis, Astron. Astrophys.678, A48 (2023), arXiv:2306.16224 [astro-ph.HE]

  7. [7]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), Astron

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

  8. [8]

    M. T. Mileset al., The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: the first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.536, 1489 (2024), arXiv:2412.01153 [astro-ph.HE]

  9. [9]

    A. R. Taylor, The Square Kilometre Array, IAU Symp. 291, 337 (2013)

  10. [10]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xuet al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

  11. [11]

    Bi, Y.-M

    Y.-C. Bi, Y.-M. Wu, Z.-C. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, Im- plications for the supermassive black hole binaries from the NANOGrav 15-year data set, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66, 120402 (2023), arXiv:2307.00722 [astro- ph.CO]

  12. [12]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, G. H¨ utsi, J. Raidal, J. Urru- tia, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Gravitational waves from supermassive black hole binaries in light of the NANOGrav 15-year data, Phys. Rev. D109, L021302 (2024), arXiv:2306.17021 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [13]

    Allen, inLes Houches School of Physics: Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation (1996) pp

    B. Allen, The Stochastic gravity wave background: Sources and detection, inLes Houches School of Physics: Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation(1996) pp. 373–417, arXiv:gr-qc/9604033

  14. [14]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological Back- grounds of Gravitational Waves, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 163001 (2018), arXiv:1801.04268 [astro-ph.CO]

  15. [15]

    J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, Detection meth- ods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment, Living Rev. Rel.20, 2 (2017), arXiv:1608.06889 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    A. I. Renzini, B. Goncharov, A. C. Jenkins, and P. M. Meyers, Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Backgrounds: Current Detection Efforts and Future Prospects, Galax- ies10, 34 (2022), arXiv:2202.00178 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    S. H.-S. Alexander, M. E. Peskin, and M. M. Sheikh- Jabbari, Leptogenesis from gravity waves in models of inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 081301 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0403069

  18. [18]

    M. Li, H. Rao, and D. Zhao, A simple parity violating gravity model without ghost instability, JCAP11, 023, arXiv:2007.08038 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    M. Li, H. Rao, and Y. Tong, Revisiting a parity vi- olating gravity model without ghost instability: Local Lorentz covariance, Phys. Rev. D104, 084077 (2021), arXiv:2104.05917 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    R.-G. Cai, C. Fu, and W.-W. Yu, Parity violation in stochastic gravitational wave background from inflation in Nieh-Yan modified teleparallel gravity, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103520 (2022), arXiv:2112.04794 [astro-ph.CO]

  21. [21]

    T.-C. Li, T. Zhu, W. Zhao, and A. Wang, Power spec- tra and circular polarization of primordial gravitational waves with parity and Lorentz violations, JCAP07, 005, arXiv:2403.05841 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Cai, Y.-T

    Y. Cai, Y.-T. Wang, and Y.-S. Piao, Chirality oscillation of primordial gravitational waves during inflation, JHEP 03, 024, arXiv:1608.06508 [astro-ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    Takahashi and J

    T. Takahashi and J. Soda, Chiral Primordial Gravita- tional Waves from a Lifshitz Point, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 231301 (2009), arXiv:0904.0554 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    J. M. Cornwall, Speculations on primordial magnetic helicity, Phys. Rev. D56, 6146 (1997), arXiv:hep- th/9704022

  25. [25]

    Vachaspati, Estimate of the primordial magnetic field helicity, Phys

    T. Vachaspati, Estimate of the primordial magnetic field helicity, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 251302 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0101261

  26. [26]

    Kahniashvili, G

    T. Kahniashvili, G. Gogoberidze, and B. Ratra, Polar- ized cosmological gravitational waves from primordial helical turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 151301 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505628

  27. [27]

    Roper Pol, S

    A. Roper Pol, S. Mandal, A. Brandenburg, T. Kahni- ashvili, and A. Kosowsky, Numerical simulations of gravi- tational waves from early-universe turbulence, Phys. Rev. D102, 083512 (2020), arXiv:1903.08585 [astro-ph.CO]

  28. [28]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, M. Lewicki, V. Vaskonen, and A. Wickens, Detecting circular polarisation in the stochastic gravitational-wave background from a first- order cosmological phase transition, JCAP10, 032, arXiv:2005.05278 [astro-ph.CO]

  29. [29]

    C. S. Machado, W. Ratzinger, P. Schwaller, and B. A. Stefanek, Audible Axions, JHEP01, 053, arXiv:1811.01950 [hep-ph]

  30. [30]

    K. Ding, C. Fu, B. Xu, and Y.-L. Zhang, Chiral grav- itational wave background in millihertz from axion-like fields, SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica, Astro- nomica54, 270408 (2024)

  31. [31]

    B. Xu, K. Ding, H. Su, J. Chen, and Y.-L. Zhang, Chi- ral gravitational wave background from audible axion via Nieh–Yan term, Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101980 (2025), arXiv:2411.08691 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    Garriga, M

    J. Garriga, M. A. Gorji, F. Hajkarim, and M. Sasaki, Oscillations and parity violation in gravitational wave background from extra tensor modes, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2508.08481 [astro-ph.CO]. 10

  33. [33]

    Valbusa Dall’Armi, A

    L. Valbusa Dall’Armi, A. Nishizawa, A. Ricciardone, and S. Matarrese, Circular Polarization of the Astrophysical Gravitational Wave Background, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041401 (2023), arXiv:2301.08205 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [34]

    S. H. W. Leong, A. F. Tom´ e, J. Calder´ on Bustillo, A. del R´ ıo, and N. Sanchis-Gual, Gravitational-wave signatures of mirror (a)symmetry in binary black hole mergers: measurability and correlation to gravitational-wave re- coil, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2501.11663 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    Martinovic, C

    K. Martinovic, C. Badger, M. Sakellariadou, and V. Mandic, Searching for parity violation with the LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA network, Phys. Rev. D104, L081101 (2021), arXiv:2103.06718 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Jiang and Q.-G

    Y. Jiang and Q.-G. Huang, Upper limits on the polarized isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background from advanced LIGO-Virgo’s first three observing runs, JCAP 02, 026, arXiv:2210.09952 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [37]

    Omiya and N

    H. Omiya and N. Seto, Measuring the maximally al- lowed polarization states of the isotropic stochastic grav- itational wave background with the ground-based detec- tors, Phys. Rev. D107, 124027 (2023), arXiv:2301.01489 [astro-ph.CO]

  38. [38]

    Barausseet al., Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA, Gen

    E. Barausseet al., Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA, Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 81 (2020), arXiv:2001.09793 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    K. G. Arunet al.(LISA), New horizons for fundamen- tal physics with LISA, Living Rev. Rel.25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2050075 (2020), arXiv:1807.09495 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravi- tational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

  42. [42]

    Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin,

    J. Luoet al., Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2502.20138 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    Seto, Quest for circular polarization of gravitational wave background and orbits of laser interferometers in space, Phys

    N. Seto, Quest for circular polarization of gravitational wave background and orbits of laser interferometers in space, Phys. Rev. D75, 061302 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0609633

  44. [44]

    Seto, Measuring Parity Asymmetry of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with a Heliocentric Detector Network in the mHz Band, Phys

    N. Seto, Measuring Parity Asymmetry of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with a Heliocentric Detector Network in the mHz Band, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 251101 (2020), arXiv:2009.02928 [gr-qc]

  45. [45]

    W.-H. Ruan, C. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, Y.-L. Wu, and R.-G. Cai, The LISA-Taiji network, Nature Astron.4, 108 (2020), arXiv:2002.03603 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    Wang, W.-T

    G. Wang, W.-T. Ni, W.-B. Han, P. Xu, and Z. Luo, Alter- native LISA-TAIJI networks, Phys. Rev. D104, 024012 (2021), arXiv:2105.00746 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Liu and K.-W

    G.-C. Liu and K.-W. Ng, Overlap reduction functions for a polarized stochastic gravitational-wave background in the Einstein Telescope-Cosmic Explorer and the LISA-Taiji networks, Phys. Rev. D107, 104040 (2023), arXiv:2210.16143 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Y. Chen, Y. Liu, J. Shu, B. Xu, X. Xue, and Y. Zeng, Identifying the Quadrupolar Nature of Gravitational Wave Background through Space-based Missions (2024), arXiv:2410.07329 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    J. Chen, C. Liu, and Y.-L. Zhang, Parity-violating Gravitational Wave Background Search with a Net- work of Space-borne Triangular Detectors, (2024), arXiv:2410.18916 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    J. Chen, C. Liu, Y.-L. Zhang, and G. Wang, Alternative LISA-TAIJI networks: Detectability of parity violation in stochastic gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D111, 084026 (2025), arXiv:2412.18420 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    H. Su, B. Xu, J. Chen, C. Liu, and Y.-L. Zhang, De- tectability of the chiral gravitational wave background from audible axions with the LISA-Taiji network, arxive (2025), arXiv:2503.20778 [astro-ph.CO]

  52. [52]

    Probing circular polarization in stochastic gravitational wave background with pulsar timing arrays,

    R. Kato and J. Soda, Probing circular polarization in stochastic gravitational wave background with pul- sar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D93, 062003 (2016), arXiv:1512.09139 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    Belgacem and M

    E. Belgacem and M. Kamionkowski, Chirality of the gravitational-wave background and pulsar-timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D102, 023004 (2020), arXiv:2004.05480 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [54]

    Sato-Polito and M

    G. Sato-Polito and M. Kamionkowski, Pulsar-timing measurement of the circular polarization of the stochas- tic gravitational-wave background, Phys. Rev. D106, 023004 (2022), arXiv:2111.05867 [astro-ph.CO]

  55. [55]

    Liang, M.-X

    Q. Liang, M.-X. Lin, M. Trodden, and S. S. C. Wong, Probing parity violation in the stochastic gravitational wave background with astrometry, Phys. Rev. D109, 083028 (2024), arXiv:2309.16666 [astro-ph.CO]

  56. [56]

    First astrometric constraints on parity-violation in the gravitational wave background

    S. Jaraba, S. Kuroyanagi, Q. Liang, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, First astrometric constraints on parity- violation in the gravitational wave background, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2505.18085 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [57]

    C ¸ alı¸ skan, Y

    M. C ¸ alı¸ skan, Y. Chen, L. Dai, N. Anil Kumar, I. Stomberg, and X. Xue, Dissecting the stochastic grav- itational wave background with astrometry, JCAP05, 030, arXiv:2312.03069 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    Husa, Michele Maggiore: Gravitational waves

    S. Husa, Michele Maggiore: Gravitational waves. Volume 1: Theory and experiments, Gen. Rel. Grav.41, 1667 (2009)

  59. [59]

    Anholm, S

    M. Anholm, S. Ballmer, J. D. E. Creighton, L. R. Price, and X. Siemens, Optimal strategies for gravitational wave stochastic background searches in pulsar timing data, Phys. Rev. D79, 084030 (2009), arXiv:0809.0701 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Seto, Prospects for direct detection of circular po- larization of gravitational-wave background, Phys

    N. Seto, Prospects for direct detection of circular po- larization of gravitational-wave background, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 151101 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0609504

  61. [61]

    Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds,

    E. Thrane and J. D. Romano, Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D88, 124032 (2013), arXiv:1310.5300 [astro-ph.IM]

  62. [62]

    Hobbs, A

    G. Hobbs, A. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Backer, M. Bailes, N. Bhat, M. Burgay, S. Burke-Spolaor, D. Champion, I. Cognard,et al., The international pul- sar timing array project: using pulsars as a gravita- tional wave detector, Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 084013 (2010)

  63. [63]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - II

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - II. Customised pulsar noise models for spatially correlated gravitational waves, Astron. Astrophys.678, A49 (2023), arXiv:2306.16225 [astro-ph.HE]

  64. [64]

    International Pulsar Timing Array, Interna- tional Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA), Available at: https://ipta4gw.org/, accessed: 26 August 2025

  65. [65]

    B. B. P. Pereraet al., The International Pulsar Timing Array: Second data release, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 490, 4666 (2019), arXiv:1909.04534 [astro-ph.HE]

  66. [66]

    Kuroda, W.-T

    K. Kuroda, W.-T. Ni, and W.-P. Pan, Gravitational waves: Classification, Methods of detection, Sensitivities, and Sources, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530031 (2015), 11 arXiv:1511.00231 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic Gravitational Wave Background,

    J. Antoniadiset al., The International Pulsar Timing Ar- ray second data release: Search for an isotropic gravita- tional wave background, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510, 4873 (2022), arXiv:2201.03980 [astro-ph.HE]

  68. [68]

    Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA,

    C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, R. Flauger, G. Nardini, M. Peloso, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and G. Tasinato, Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic grav- itational wave background with LISA, JCAP11, 017, arXiv:1906.09244 [astro-ph.CO]

  69. [69]

    Lu, L.-T

    Z. Lu, L.-T. Wang, and H. Xiao, A new probe ofµHz gravitational waves with FRB timing, Phys. Dark Univ. 49, 101979 (2025), arXiv:2407.12920 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    L. G. Book and E. E. Flanagan, Astrometric Effects of a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background, Phys. Rev. D83, 024024 (2011), arXiv:1009.4192 [astro-ph.CO]

  71. [71]

    W. Qin, K. K. Boddy, M. Kamionkowski, and L. Dai, Pulsar-timing arrays, astrometry, and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D99, 063002 (2019), arXiv:1810.02369 [astro-ph.CO]

  72. [72]

    Y. Wang, K. Pardo, T.-C. Chang, and O. Dor´ e, Con- straining the stochastic gravitational wave background with photometric surveys, Phys. Rev. D106, 084006 (2022), arXiv:2205.07962 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    L. M. B. Alves, A. G. Sullivan, I. Bartos, D. Veske, S. Will, Z. M´ arka, and S. M´ arka, Artificial Precision Timing Array: bridging the decihertz gravitational- wave sensitivity gap with clock satellites, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2401.13668 [astro-ph.IM]

  74. [74]

    Artificial Precision Polarization Array: Sensitivity for the axion-like dark matter with clock satellites

    H. Jiang, B. Xu, and Y.-L. Zhang, Artificial Precision Po- larization Array: Sensitivity for the axion-like dark mat- ter with clock satellites, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2511.04400 [astro-ph.CO]

  75. [75]

    Allen and J

    B. Allen and J. D. Romano, Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal process- ing strategies and sensitivities, Phys. Rev. D59, 102001 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9710117