Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 2 minor 64 references

Activation Steering for Aligned Open-ended Generation without Sacrificing Coherence

T0 review · 4 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Robotic value estimation works better when a video generator predicts future body state together with task progress.

desk verdict Abstract-only activation-steering paper with selective StTP/StMP methods; the supplied full text is a different robotics paper, so the claims stay uncheckable. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.08169 v2 pith:MXWQVYC4 submitted 2026-04-09 cs.AI

Niklas Herbster , Martin Zborowski , Alberto Tosato , Gauthier Gidel , Tommaso Tosato This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords videogenerativemodelsvalueestimationrobotreinforcementlearningvision-language-actionproprioceptionlong-horizonmanipulationflowmatchingembodimentdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Long-horizon robot manipulation needs a value signal that knows whether the current interaction is heading toward success, yet models built on static vision-language encoders mainly see what is in a frame, not how the scene will change. This paper argues that value estimation is fundamentally future anticipation, so a pretrained video generator is a more natural backbone than a static vision-language model. ViVa adapts such a generator to take multi-view images and robot proprioception, then jointly predict future proprioception and a scalar value for the current state. Grounding value in anticipated embodiment dynamics yields progress signals that track milestones, drop on fine-grained execution errors, and transfer better to novel objects. When those signals drive policy refinement on three real dual-arm tasks, average success rises to 80 percent, outperforming the same pipeline with a vision-language value model.

What carries the argument

ViVa: a video-generative value model that injects proprioception (repeat-padding) and scalar value (broadcast) as latent frames into a pretrained video diffusion Transformer, then trains it with flow matching to recover future proprioception and current value from a clean conditioning prefix of multi-view observations.

What would settle it

On the held-out episodes, measure whether ViVa’s value rises at annotated milestones and falls at annotated errors more often and more strongly than the vision-language baseline; then check whether the same reinforcement-learning pipeline with ViVa still beats that baseline on real-robot success rates for shirt folding, box packaging, and paper-roll organization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Accurate robotic value estimation requires anticipating how embodiment and the scene will evolve, not only classifying the current frame. By repurposing a pretrained video diffusion model to jointly denoise future proprioception and a scalar return, ViVa produces value trajectories that respond more correctly to milestones and errors than dense-supervised vision-language value models, and those better values improve real-robot success under the same reinforcement-learning pipeline.

Load-bearing premise

That binary episode success labels plus a simple step-wise progress-and-penalty reward produce a cumulative return that is a faithful enough target for genuine task progress rather than shallow correlates of success.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Value signals that correctly track milestones and drop at execution errors supply stronger advantages for policy refinement in long-horizon dual-arm tasks.
  • Real-robot average success reaches 80 percent across shirt folding, box packaging, and paper-roll organization when ViVa replaces a vision-language value model in the same pipeline.
  • Spatiotemporal priors from video pretraining transfer more reliably to novel objects (pants folding) than static vision-language representations.
  • Joint future-proprioception prediction sharpens error sensitivity beyond predicting value alone from the same video backbone.
  • Removing the video pretrained weights collapses milestone and error metrics, so large-scale video dynamics priors are load-bearing for the approach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same future-prediction framing could be tried in other delayed-feedback control settings where static encoders currently give flat or inverted progress signals.
  • Scaling video-generator pretraining specifically for value estimation may reduce dependence on dense per-task success labels.
  • Coupling value to predicted proprioception might flag impending kinematic or coordination failures before they become obvious in the visual stream.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 2 minor

Summary. The abstract claims that alignment failures (dishonesty, dismissiveness) are linearly encoded in LLM activation space and can be mitigated at runtime by three steering methods—uniform SwFC plus two novel projection-aware interventions (StTP, StMP) that apply a logistic-regression decision boundary only to tokens below a threshold. On Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen3.6-27B, all methods are said to recover alignment under malicious-system-prompt proxies while StTP/StMP better preserve MMLU/MT-Bench/AlpacaEval; a single honesty direction is further claimed to generalize to MASK, Among Us, AuditBench, and an emergently misaligned model. The full manuscript body supplied under paper_id 2604.08169 is, however, an unrelated robotics paper (ViVa: a video-generative value model for robot RL, arXiv:2604.08168). No methods, equations, tables, ablations, or OOD protocols for the activation-steering claims appear in the provided text.

Significance. If the abstract claims held under proper scrutiny, selective projection-aware steering would be a practically useful lightweight runtime defense that improves on uniform additive steering by intervening only when needed, and a transferable honesty direction would be of clear interest for monitoring and post-hoc correction. Those contributions cannot be assessed from the materials actually supplied: the body contains no evidence for StTP/StMP, capability preservation, or the listed OOD results. The significance of the claimed work therefore remains undetermined pending a correct manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. Manuscript identity mismatch: paper_id/title/abstract describe activation steering (StTP/StMP, dishonesty/dismissiveness, Llama-3.3-70B and Qwen3.6-27B), but the full text is ViVa (video-generative value model for shirt folding / box packaging / paper-roll tasks). No section, equation, or table for the claimed steering methods exists in the supplied body. The central claims are therefore uncheckable.
  2. Load-bearing proxy premise (abstract): evaluation uses 'malicious system prompts as a controlled proxy for misalignment' covering adversarial prompts, benign fine-tuning, emergent misalignment, and goal misgeneralization. Without the methods/results sections, there is no evidence that the proxy is validated against those other mechanisms, nor that the honesty direction remains reliable when misalignment is induced differently.
  3. OOD generalization claims (abstract final sentence: MASK, Among Us, AuditBench, emergent misalignment) cannot be inspected for controls, effect sizes, statistical tests, or failure modes because the corresponding experiments are absent from the provided manuscript. These claims are load-bearing for the 'runtime defense' framing and must be present and reproducible.
  4. Free parameters (steering coefficient, logistic threshold, layer/token positions) and the definition of the decision boundary are not specified in any available section. Selective intervention is the claimed novelty over SwFC; without those details and ablations, the advantage of StTP/StMP over uniform steering cannot be verified.
minor comments (2)
  1. The supplied body (ViVa) is internally coherent as a robotics paper but is irrelevant to the abstract under review; no minor presentation fixes on that body would address the activation-steering claims.
  2. Abstract-only evaluation leaves free parameters and invented method names (StTP, StMP) without operational definitions; a correct full manuscript must define them formally (e.g., projection operators and the logistic boundary equation).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the supplied full manuscript (ViVa) trains a value model on explicit returns and validates on held-out and real-robot outcomes; the activation-steering abstract alone exhibits no equation-level reduction.

full rationale

The CACHEABLE full manuscript body is ViVa (arXiv 2604.08168), not the activation-steering paper named in the metadata (2604.08169). Walking ViVa’s chain: the value target is the cumulative return R_t defined from binary success labels and temporal progress (Eqs. 1–2); the model is trained by flow matching to recover that target plus future proprioception; evaluation uses held-out Pearson/Spearman correlation, independently annotated milestone/error frames (ERS/MS/ES/MDR/ErrDR), and real-robot RECAP success rates on new rollouts. None of these steps is equivalent to its inputs by construction—held-out correlation and robot success are external to the training objective. Citations (Wan2.2, RECAP/π0.6, GVL, TopReward) are to external groups, not load-bearing self-citations of uniqueness theorems. For the activation-steering abstract that was supplied without matching methods, no equations or probe-training details are present, so no specific reduction (e.g., “recovery = moving across the same logistic boundary used to define the direction”) can be exhibited. Per the hard rules, absence of a quotable reduction yields score 0 and empty steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only review of an activation-steering paper. Load-bearing background includes the linear representation hypothesis for misalignment behaviors and the use of malicious system prompts as a proxy for broader misalignment. Free parameters include steering coefficients and the logistic decision threshold. Invented entities are the two selective steering operators defined by the authors.

free parameters (3)
  • Fixed steering coefficient (SwFC)
    Uniform additive scale applied to the steering vector; abstract does not report how it is chosen or swept.
  • Logistic regression decision threshold / boundary
    StTP and StMP intervene only when activations fall below a probe-defined threshold; threshold and probe training are free design choices that gate all selective results.
  • Layer(s) and token positions for intervention
    Not specified in the abstract; standard free choices that strongly affect steering success and capability tradeoffs.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Some misalignment behaviors (dishonesty, dismissiveness) are encoded as approximately linear structure in residual-stream or related activation space and can be edited by additive steering.
    Stated as the premise that makes activation steering a tractable runtime defense.
  • ad hoc to paper Malicious system prompts are a controlled proxy sufficient to stand in for adversarial prompts, benign fine-tuning, emergent misalignment, and goal misgeneralization when evaluating defenses.
    Abstract explicitly uses malicious system prompts as the evaluation proxy for those broader threat classes.
  • ad hoc to paper A logistic regression boundary in activation space identifies tokens that should receive intervention without needing full policy retraining.
    Core design assumption of StTP and StMP.
invented entities (2)
  • Steer-to-Target-Projection (StTP)
    purpose: Selectively steer only tokens below a logistic boundary toward a target projection of the alignment direction.
    Named as a novel projection-aware method in the abstract; no independent evidence outside this paper’s experiments.
  • Steer-to-Mirror-Projection (StMP)
    purpose: Selectively steer tokens below the boundary toward a mirrored projection to restore alignment while limiting capability damage.
    Named as a novel method; existence and benefit are internal to the paper’s claims.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Activation Steering for Aligned Open-ended Generation without Sacrificing Coherence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MXWQVYC4

@misc{pith2026260408169,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Activation Steering for Aligned Open-ended Generation without Sacrificing Coherence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MXWQVYC4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.08169}
}
read the original abstract

Alignment in LLMs is more brittle than commonly assumed: misalignment can be induced by adversarial prompts, benign fine-tuning, emergent misalignment, and goal misgeneralization. Recent evidence suggests that some misalignment behaviors are encoded as linear structure in activation space, making it tractable via activation steering, which could be used as a lightweight runtime defense. We implement three methods: Steer-With-Fixed-Coefficient (SwFC), which applies uniform additive steering, and two novel projection-aware methods, Steer-to-Target-Projection (StTP) and Steer-to-Mirror-Projection (StMP), that use a logistic regression decision boundary to selectively intervene only on tokens whose activations fall below the threshold. We evaluate these methods on two threat models, dishonesty and dismissiveness, using malicious system prompts as a controlled proxy for misalignment. We conduct our experiments on two architectures (Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen3.6-27B). All methods substantially recover alignment. StTP and StMP preserve general capabilities (MMLU, MT-Bench, AlpacaEval) better than uniform steering. Finally, we show that our honesty steering generalizes to out-of-distribution scenarios: a single honesty direction extracted from the aligned model significantly raises scores on the MASK benchmark, suppresses deception in multi-agent settings (Among Us), doubles the hidden-behavior discovery rate on AuditBench, and restores honesty in an emergently misaligned model

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08169 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. PCA and projection histogram analysis. Each panel shows a 2×2 grid: PCA of response￾averaged embeddings (top-left), PCA of all-token embeddings (top-right), and the corresponding projection histograms onto vˆ ℓ (bottom row). Dashed lines show the logistic regression decision boundary mℓ used by StTP & StMP. coherent. More broadly, Bartoszcze et al. (2025) identify fluency evaluation as a key open challenge in the re… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Steering methods. SwFC adds a fixed-magnitude vector; StTP shifts the projection to a target value along ˆvℓ ; and StMP mirrors the projection across a hyperplane orthogonal to ˆvℓ . where h¯ ℓ denotes the mean hidden state over response tokens at layer ℓ. We train a binary logistic regression classifier on E + ℓ ∪ E− ℓ : P(y= + 1 | e) = σ(w⊤ ℓ e + bℓ ). (2) We normalize the weight vector to obtain the steering dire… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Single-Turn Open-Ended Response Steering (all-token mode, Llama-3.3-70B). Each column corresponds to a steering method (SwFC, StTP, StMP). The top two rows show honesty score and coherence under the dishonesty threat; the bottom two rows show compassion score and coherence under the dismissiveness threat. Each curve corresponds to a different steering coefficient α (see legend). Horizontal lines mark the aligned bas… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: AlpacaEval length-controlled win rates under steering (Llama-3.3-70B). Steered outputs are compared against the unsteered model as reference. Honesty (left) and compassion (right) steering. A win rate below 50% indicates capability degradation. Error bars show 95% boot…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Per-token target distance. Target distance (z-score from the positive distribution mean; lower = more aligned) across token positions, smoothed with an 8-token moving average. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Multi-turn steering evaluation. Rows: trait score and coherence; sentence reuse and cross-turn 4-gram repetition. 5.3 Per-Token Steering Dynamics We examine how steering operates within a single response by tracking each token’s target distance, the z-score of its proj…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 34 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cosmos world foundation model platform for physical ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03575, 2025

    Niket Agarwal, Arslan Ali, Maciej Bala, Yogesh Balaji, Erik Barker, Tiffany Cai, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Yongxin Chen, Yin Cui, Yifan Ding, et al. Cosmos world foundation model platform for physical ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03575, 2025. 4

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025

    Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025. 2

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    All are worth words: A vit backbone for diffusion models

    Fan Bao, Shen Nie, Kaiwen Xue, Yue Cao, Chongxuan Li, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. All are worth words: A vit backbone for diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 22669–22679, 2023. 3

    2023

  4. [4]

    Gen2act: Human video generation in novel scenarios enables generalizable robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16283, 2024

    Homanga Bharadhwaj, Debidatta Dwibedi, Abhinav Gupta, Shubham Tulsiani, Carl Doersch, Ted Xiao, Dhruv Shah, Fei Xia, Dorsa Sadigh, and Sean Kirmani. Gen2act: Human video generation in novel scenarios enables generalizable robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16283, 2024. 3

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram Voleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 3

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Pix2video: Video editing using image diffusion

    Duygu Ceylan, Chun-Hao P Huang, and Niloy J Mitra. Pix2video: Video editing using image diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 23206–23217, 2023. 3

    2023

  7. [7]

    Gr-2: A generative video-language-action model with web-scale knowledge for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06158, 2024

    Chi-Lam Cheang, Guangzeng Chen, Ya Jing, Tao Kong, Hang Li, Yifeng Li, Yuxiao Liu, Hongtao Wu, Jiafeng Xu, Yichu Yang, et al. Gr-2: A generative video-language-action model with web-scale knowledge for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06158, 2024. 3

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Spa- tialvlm: Endowing vision-language models with spatial reasoning capabilities

    Boyuan Chen, Zhuo Xu, Sean Kirmani, Brain Ichter, Dorsa Sadigh, Leonidas Guibas, and Fei Xia. Spa- tialvlm: Endowing vision-language models with spatial reasoning capabilities. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14455–14465, 2024. 2

    2024

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Topreward: Token probabilities as hidden zero-shot rewards for robotics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.19313, 2026

    Shirui Chen, Cole Harrison, Ying-Chun Lee, Angela Jin Yang, Zhongzheng Ren, Lillian J Ratliff, Jiafei Duan, Dieter Fox, and Ranjay Krishna. Topreward: Token probabilities as hidden zero-shot rewards for robotics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.19313, 2026. 3, 8

    2026

  2. [10]

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with ad- vanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261, 2025

    Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, Ice Pasupat, Noveen Sachdeva, Inderjit Dhillon, Marcel Blistein, Ori Ram, Dan Zhang, Evan Rosen, et al. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with ad- vanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capab...

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Video language planning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10625,

    Yilun Du, Mengjiao Yang, Pete Florence, Fei Xia, Ayzaan Wahid, Brian Ichter, Pierre Sermanet, Tianhe Yu, Pieter Abbeel, Joshua B Tenenbaum, et al. Video language planning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10625,

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:9156–9172, 2023

    Yilun Du, Sherry Yang, Bo Dai, Hanjun Dai, Ofir Nachum, Josh Tenenbaum, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel. Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:9156–9172, 2023. 3

    2023

  5. [13]

    Diffusion guidance is a controllable policy improvement operator.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23458, 2025

    Kevin Frans, Seohong Park, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Diffusion guidance is a controllable policy improvement operator.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23458, 2025. 3

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Self-improving embodied foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15155, 2025

    Seyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan Tompson, Pannag Sanketi, and Igor Mor- datch. Self-improving embodied foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15155, 2025. 3 14 ViVa: A Video-Generative Value Model for Robot Reinforcement Learning

    2025

  7. [15]

    Co-rft: Efficient fine-tuning of vision-language-action models through chunked offline reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02219, 2025

    Dongchi Huang, Zhirui Fang, Tianle Zhang, Yihang Li, Lin Zhao, and Chunhe Xia. Co-rft: Efficient fine-tuning of vision-language-action models through chunked offline reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02219, 2025. 3

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents

    Wenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, and Igor Mordatch. Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 9118–9147. PMLR, 2022. 1

    2022

  9. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14759, 2025

    Physical Intelligence, Ali Amin, Raichelle Aniceto, Ashwin Balakrishna, Kevin Black, Ken Conley, Grace Connors, James Darpinian, Karan Dhabalia, Jared DiCarlo, et al.� � ���: a vla that learns from experience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14759, 2025. 2, 3, 7, 8, 10

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Physical Intelligence, Kevin Black, Noah Brown, James Darpinian, Karan Dhabalia, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, et al.����: a vision-language-action model with open-world generalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025. 1, 10

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision-based robotic manipulation

    Dmitry Kalashnikov, Alex Irpan, Peter Pastor, Julian Ibarz, Alexander Herzog, Eric Jang, Deirdre Quillen, Ethan Holly, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Vincent Vanhoucke, et al. Scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision-based robotic manipulation. InConference on robot learning, pag...

    2018

  12. [20]

    Emergence of human to robot transfer in vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22414, 2025

    Simar Kareer, Karl Pertsch, James Darpinian, Judy Hoffman, Danfei Xu, Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn, and Suraj Nair. Emergence of human to robot transfer in vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22414, 2025. 3

    2025

  13. [21]

    Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Foster, Grace Lam, Pannag Sanketi, et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024. 1, 3

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

    Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Mastering stacking of diverse shapes with large-scale iterative reinforcement learning on real robots

    Thomas Lampe, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Sarah Bechtle, Sandy H Huang, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Michael Bloesch, Oliver Groth, Roland Hafner, Tim Hertweck, Michael Neunert, et al. Mastering stacking of diverse shapes with large-scale iterative reinforcement learning on real robots. I...

    2024

  16. [24]

    Offline reinforcement learning: Tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643, 2020

    Sergey Levine, Aviral Kumar, George Tucker, and Justin Fu. Offline reinforcement learning: Tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643, 2020. 3

    2005 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Llava-next-interleave: Tackling multi-image, video, and 3d in large multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07895, 2024

    Feng Li, Renrui Zhang, Hao Zhang, Yuanhan Zhang, Bo Li, Wei Li, Zejun Ma, and Chunyuan Li. Llava-next-interleave: Tackling multi-image, video, and 3d in large multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07895, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Cogact: A foundational vision-language-action model for synergizing cognition and action in robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19650, 2024

    Qixiu Li, Yaobo Liang, Zeyu Wang, Lin Luo, Xi Chen, Mozheng Liao, Fangyun Wei, Yu Deng, Sicheng Xu, Yizhong Zhang, et al. Cogact: A foundational vision-language-action model for synergizing cognition and action in robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19650, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Cogvla: Cognition-aligned vision-language- action model via instruction-driven routing & sparsification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.21046, 2025

    Wei Li, Renshan Zhang, Rui Shao, Jie He, and Liqiang Nie. Cogvla: Cognition-aligned vision-language- action model via instruction-driven routing & sparsification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.21046, 2025. 1

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    What matters in building vision–language–action models for generalist robots

    Xinghang Li, Peiyan Li, Long Qian, Minghuan Liu, Dong Wang, Jirong Liu, Bingyi Kang, Xiao Ma, Xinlong Wang, Di Guo, et al. What matters in building vision–language–action models for generalist robots. Nature Machine Intelligence, pages 1–15, 2026. 1 15 ViVa: A Video-Generative...

    2026

  21. [29]

    Video generators are robot policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00795, 2025

    Junbang Liang, Pavel Tokmakov, Ruoshi Liu, Sruthi Sudhakar, Paarth Shah, Rares Ambrus, and Carl Vondrick. Video generators are robot policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00795, 2025. 4

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07864, 2024

    Songming Liu, Lingxuan Wu, Bangguo Li, Hengkai Tan, Huayu Chen, Zhengyi Wang, Ke Xu, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07864, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Serl: A software suite for sample-efficient robotic reinforcement learning

    Jianlan Luo, Zheyuan Hu, Charles Xu, You Liang Tan, Jacob Berg, Archit Sharma, Stefan Schaal, Chelsea Finn, Abhishek Gupta, and Sergey Levine. Serl: A software suite for sample-efficient robotic reinforcement learning. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Autom...

    2024

  24. [32]

    Liv: Language- image representations and rewards for robotic control

    Yecheng Jason Ma, Vikash Kumar, Amy Zhang, Osbert Bastani, and Dinesh Jayaraman. Liv: Language- image representations and rewards for robotic control. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 23301–23320. PMLR, 2023. 3

    2023

  25. [33]

    Vision language models are in-context value learners

    Yecheng Jason Ma, Joey Hejna, Chuyuan Fu, Dhruv Shah, Jacky Liang, Zhuo Xu, Sean Kirmani, Peng Xu, Danny Driess, Ted Xiao, et al. Vision language models are in-context value learners. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  26. [34]

    Vision language models are in-context value learners

    Yecheng Jason Ma, Joey Hejna, Chuyuan Fu, Dhruv Shah, Jacky Liang, Zhuo Xu, Sean Kirmani, Peng Xu, Danny Driess, Ted Xiao, et al. Vision language models are in-context value learners. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2025, pages 33984–34009, 2025. 8

    2025

  27. [35]

    Iris: Implicit reinforcement without interaction at scale for learning control from offline robot manipulation data

    Ajay Mandlekar, Fabio Ramos, Byron Boots, Silvio Savarese, Li Fei-Fei, Animesh Garg, and Dieter Fox. Iris: Implicit reinforcement without interaction at scale for learning control from offline robot manipulation data. In2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa...

  28. [36]

    Smolvlm: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05299, 2025

    Andrés Marafioti, Orr Zohar, Miquel Farré, Merve Noyan, Elie Bakouch, Pedro Cuenca, Cyril Zakka, Loubna Ben Allal, Anton Lozhkov, Nouamane Tazi, et al. Smolvlm: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05299, 2025. 2

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Alan: Autonomously exploring robotic agents in the real world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06604, 2023

    Russell Mendonca, Shikhar Bahl, and Deepak Pathak. Alan: Autonomously exploring robotic agents in the real world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06604, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0

    Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhiram Maddukuri, Abhishek Gupta, Abhishek Padalkar, Abraham Lee, Acorn Pooley, Agrim Gupta, Ajay Mandlekar, Ajinkya Jain, et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0. In2024 IEEE Internati...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023. 3

    2023

  32. [40]

    Diffdance: Cascaded human motion diffusion model for dance generation

    Qiaosong Qi, Le Zhuo, Aixi Zhang, Yue Liao, Fei Fang, Si Liu, and Shuicheng Yan. Diffdance: Cascaded human motion diffusion model for dance generation. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 1374–1382, 2023. 3

    2023

  33. [41]

    A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning

    Stéphane Ross, Geoffrey Gordon, and Drew Bagnell. A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning. InProceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 627–635. JMLR Workshop and Conf...

    2011

  34. [42]

    Vision-language-action (vla) models: Concepts, progress, applications and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04769, 2025

    Ranjan Sapkota, Yang Cao, Konstantinos I Roumeliotis, and Manoj Karkee. Vision-language-action (vla) models: Concepts, progress, applications and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04769, 2025. 1 16 ViVa: A Video-Generative Value Model for Robot Reinforcement Learning

    2025

  35. [43]

    Self-improving robots: End-to-end autonomous visuomotor reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01488, 2023

    Archit Sharma, Ahmed M Ahmed, Rehaan Ahmad, and Chelsea Finn. Self-improving robots: End-to-end autonomous visuomotor reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01488, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792, 2022

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    MIT press Cambridge, 1998

    Richard S Sutton, Andrew G Barto, et al.Reinforcement learning: An introduction, volume 1. MIT press Cambridge, 1998. 2, 3

    1998

  38. [46]

    Gigabrain-0: A world model-powered vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19430, 2025

    GigaBrain Team, Angen Ye, Boyuan Wang, Chaojun Ni, Guan Huang, Guosheng Zhao, Haoyun Li, Jie Li, Jiagang Zhu, Lv Feng, et al. Gigabrain-0: A world model-powered vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19430, 2025. 10

    2025

  39. [47]

    Gigabrain-0.5 m*: a vla that learns from world model-based reinforcement learning

    GigaBrain Team, Boyuan Wang, Chaojun Ni, Guan Huang, Guosheng Zhao, Hao Li, Jie Li, Jindi Lv, Jingyu Liu, Lv Feng, et al. Gigabrain-0.5 m*: a vla that learns from world model-based reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12099, 2026. 1

    2026

  40. [48]

    Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213, 2024

    Octo Model Team, Dibya Ghosh, Homer Walke, Karl Pertsch, Kevin Black, Oier Mees, Sudeep Dasari, Joey Hejna, Tobias Kreiman, Charles Xu, et al. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Phenaki: Variable length video generation from open domain textual description.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02399, 2022

    Ruben Villegas, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Hernan Moraldo, Han Zhang, Moham- mad Taghi Saffar, Santiago Castro, Julius Kunze, and Dumitru Erhan. Phenaki: Variable length video generation from open domain textual description.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02399, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Team Wan, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025. 4, 5

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation

    Hongtao Wu, Ya Jing, Chilam Cheang, Guangzeng Chen, Jiafeng Xu, Xinghang Li, Minghuan Liu, Hang Li, and Tao Kong. Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13139, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Learning interactive real-world simulators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06114, 1(2):6, 2023

    Mengjiao Yang, Yilun Du, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Jonathan Tompson, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel. Learning interactive real-world simulators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06114, 1(2):6, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Gigaworld-policy: An efficient action-centered world–action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.17240, 2026

    Angen Ye, Boyuan Wang, Chaojun Ni, Guan Huang, Guosheng Zhao, Hao Li, Hengtao Li, Jie Li, Jindi Lv, Jingyu Liu, et al. Gigaworld-policy: An efficient action-centered world–action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.17240, 2026. 3

    2026

  47. [55]

    World action models are zero-shot policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15922, 2026

    Seonghyeon Ye, Yunhao Ge, Kaiyuan Zheng, Shenyuan Gao, Sihyun Yu, George Kurian, Suneel Indupuru, You Liang Tan, Chuning Zhu, Jiannan Xiang, et al. World action models are zero-shot policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15922, 2026. 3

    2026 arXiv

  48. [56]

    A vision-language-action-critic model for robotic real-world reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15937, 2025

    Shaopeng Zhai, Qi Zhang, Tianyi Zhang, Fuxian Huang, Haoran Zhang, Ming Zhou, Shengzhe Zhang, Litao Liu, Sixu Lin, and Jiangmiao Pang. A vision-language-action-critic model for robotic real-world reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15937, 2025. 3

    2025

  49. [57]

    Sigmoid loss for language image pre- training

    Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre- training. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 11975–11986,

  50. [58]

    13 17 ViVa: A Video-Generative Value Model for Robot Reinforcement Learning

  51. [59]

    Gevrm: Goal-expressive video generation model for robust visual manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09268, 2025

    Hongyin Zhang, Pengxiang Ding, Shangke Lyu, Ying Peng, and Donglin Wang. Gevrm: Goal-expressive video generation model for robust visual manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09268, 2025. 3

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Taste- rob: Advancing video generation of task-oriented hand-object interaction for generalizable robotic manipulation

    Hongxiang Zhao, Xingchen Liu, Mutian Xu, Yiming Hao, Weikai Chen, and Xiaoguang Han. Taste- rob: Advancing video generation of task-oriented hand-object interaction for generalizable robotic manipulation. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference,...

    2025

  53. [61]

    Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20404, 2024

    Zangwei Zheng, Xiangyu Peng, Tianji Yang, Chenhui Shen, Shenggui Li, Hongxin Liu, Yukun Zhou, Tianyi Li, and Yang You. Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20404, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Robodreamer: Learning compositional world models for robot imagination.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12377, 2024

    Siyuan Zhou, Yilun Du, Jiaben Chen, Yandong Li, Dit-Yan Yeung, and Chuang Gan. Robodreamer: Learning compositional world models for robot imagination.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12377, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Internvl3: Exploring advanced training and test-time recipes for open-source multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479, 2025

    Jinguo Zhu, Weiyun Wang, Zhe Chen, Zhaoyang Liu, Shenglong Ye, Lixin Gu, Hao Tian, Yuchen Duan, Weijie Su, Jie Shao, et al. Internvl3: Exploring advanced training and test-time recipes for open-source multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479, 2025. 2

    2025 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control

    Brianna Zitkovich, Tianhe Yu, Sichun Xu, Peng Xu, Ted Xiao, Fei Xia, Jialin Wu, Paul Wohlhart, Stefan Welker, Ayzaan Wahid, et al. Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 2165–2183. PMLR, 2023. 1 18

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.