arxiv: 2604.08280 · v4 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Modern Approach to Orbital Hall Effect Based on Wannier Picture of Solids

Mirco Sastges , Insu Baek , Hojun Lee , Hyun-Woo Lee , Yuriy Mokrousov , Dongwook Go

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords orbital Hall conductivityWannier functionsorbital angular momentumfirst-principles calculationsnon-local effectsorbital transportorbital magnetization

0 comments

The pith

A Wannier-function representation of the orbital angular momentum operator captures both local and itinerant contributions, leading to substantial corrections in orbital Hall conductivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a method to express the orbital angular momentum operator in the basis of Wannier functions, drawing on the modern theory of orbital magnetization. This representation includes both the local atomic parts and the itinerant parts that extend across the solid, unlike common atom-centered approximations that capture only local contributions. First-principles calculations across various materials demonstrate that the non-local itinerant effects produce significant changes to the computed orbital Hall conductivity. Accurate values of this conductivity matter for understanding orbital transport phenomena that could be harnessed in electronic devices.

Core claim

Expressing the orbital angular momentum operator via Wannier functions derived from the modern theory of orbital magnetization incorporates both local and itinerant contributions to the orbital Hall conductivity. When applied in first-principles calculations, this yields large corrections relative to approximations limited to atom-centered terms. The result shows that non-local effects must be included for reliable estimates of orbital Hall conductivity in real materials.

What carries the argument

The Wannier-function representation of the orbital angular momentum operator based on the modern theory of orbital magnetization, which accounts for both local and itinerant contributions to the orbital Hall conductivity.

If this is right

Orbital Hall conductivity receives significant corrections from non-local itinerant effects in multiple materials.
Atom-centered approximations miss important parts of the orbital Hall conductivity and lead to inaccurate results.
The approach provides a route to more precise estimation of orbital effects in complex materials.
Orbital angular momentum in solids must be treated with both local and itinerant components for transport calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This representation could be extended to compute related orbital transport quantities such as orbital torque in layered structures where itinerant contributions may dominate.
Material-specific corrections suggest that orbital Hall device design requires full calculations rather than local approximations for accurate performance predictions.
The method opens a path to quantify how crystal symmetry and band dispersion control the size of non-local orbital contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The Wannier-function form of the orbital angular momentum operator fully captures all itinerant contributions without uncontrolled errors arising from the specific choice of Wannier basis or gauge.

What would settle it

A first-principles calculation of orbital Hall conductivity in a specific material such as platinum or a transition-metal dichalcogenide using an independent gauge-invariant method that includes the full position operator and yields values matching the new Wannier results but differing from atom-centered approximations would support the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08280 by Dongwook Go, Hojun Lee, Hyun-Woo Lee, Insu Baek, Mirco Sastges, Yuriy Mokrousov.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Full Hilbert space, spanned by different projectors [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In the field of orbital dynamics and orbital transport, a particularly important quantity is the so-called orbital Hall conductivity (OHC), which is expressed in terms of operators of velocity and orbital angular momentum (OAM). To overcome the difficulties in treating the unbounded position operator, very often atom-centered approximations are used, which capture only a part of the local contributions to the OAM operator. Here, we promote a new approach to quantify the OAM operator in the basis of Wannier functions, which is based on the modern theory of orbital magnetization and which captures both local and itinerant contributions to the OHC. By performing first-principles calculations for various materials, we show that significant corrections to the OHC by non-local effects arise when compared to common approximations. Our approach improves the understanding of the OAM in solids and allows for a precise estimation of various orbital effects in complex materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Wannier mapping of the OAM operator adds itinerant contributions to OHC calculations and shows sizable corrections, but gauge and localization sensitivity remain unaddressed in the reported results.

read the letter

The core advance is a practical way to represent the orbital angular momentum operator in the Wannier basis that pulls in the itinerant pieces via the modern orbital magnetization formalism. This goes beyond the usual atom-centered shortcuts that drop those terms. Their first-principles runs on several materials then turn up noticeable shifts in the orbital Hall conductivity once the non-local parts are kept in. That part is straightforward and directly useful for anyone computing orbital transport quantities. The method itself is cleanly derived from existing theory rather than invented from scratch, which keeps the foundation solid. The calculations appear to be done with standard codes, so the implementation barrier is low. The main soft spot is the lack of any reported checks on how sensitive the itinerant corrections are to the specific Wannier gauge or disentanglement choices. Different maximal-localization spreads can move the inter-site matrix elements of r and therefore the effective L operator, and those shifts are often in the 10-30% range for related Berry-phase quantities. If the claimed corrections sit inside that window, it is hard to tell how much is physical versus representational. The abstract also gives no error bars, k-point convergence data, or side-by-side comparison against a fully gauge-invariant formulation or large-supercell limit. Those omissions make the quantitative claims harder to trust at face value. This work is aimed at the orbital-transport and orbitronics community that already runs Wannier-based calculations and wants a more complete OAM operator. A reader who needs a drop-in replacement for atom-centered OHC estimates will get immediate value from the numbers, even if they later have to add their own convergence tests. The paper is coherent on its own terms and engages the relevant literature without obvious internal contradictions, so it clears the bar for serious refereeing. I would send it out for review with a request for explicit gauge-sensitivity tests and benchmark comparisons.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a Wannier-function representation of the orbital angular momentum (OAM) operator derived from the modern theory of orbital magnetization. This formulation is intended to capture both local and itinerant (non-local) contributions to the orbital Hall conductivity (OHC), in contrast to common atom-centered approximations that only include local parts. First-principles calculations on several materials are presented to demonstrate that non-local effects lead to significant corrections in the OHC values.

Significance. If validated, the method offers a systematic way to include itinerant OAM contributions in transport calculations without ad-hoc cutoffs, which could refine predictions of orbital transport phenomena in solids where delocalized states matter. The explicit link to the modern orbital magnetization theory provides a gauge-consistent starting point that may generalize to other orbital effects.

major comments (3)

[§3.2, Eq. (8)] §3.2, Eq. (8): The Wannier-gauge definition of the position operator via centers and Berry connections is used to construct the OAM matrix elements; however, the manuscript does not report the variation of computed OHC under different maximal-localization or disentanglement choices, even though such variations routinely reach 10-30% in related Berry-phase quantities and could account for part of the claimed corrections.
[§5.1 and Table II] §5.1 and Table II: The reported OHC corrections (e.g., 25-40% for the listed compounds) are presented without accompanying error bars, k-point convergence data, or comparison against an independent gauge-invariant formulation such as a large-supercell real-space evaluation of the position operator; this leaves open whether the differences survive changes in numerical parameters.
[§4.3] §4.3: The claim that the approach 'fully captures' itinerant contributions rests on the modern-theory derivation, yet no explicit test is shown that the resulting OHC is independent of the Wannier basis spread or that it recovers known limits (e.g., atomic limit or uniform gauge) where non-local terms should vanish.

minor comments (2)

[Figure 3] Figure 3: The color scale and units on the OHC maps are not stated in the caption; add explicit labels and a note on the integration window used for the conductivity.
[References] Reference list: Several key papers on the modern theory of orbital magnetization (e.g., the original works by Thonhauser et al. and Xiao et al.) are cited only indirectly; direct citations would clarify the lineage of Eq. (8).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments have prompted us to strengthen the numerical validation and clarify the theoretical foundations of our Wannier-based OAM operator. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will appear in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (8)] The Wannier-gauge definition of the position operator via centers and Berry connections is used to construct the OAM matrix elements; however, the manuscript does not report the variation of computed OHC under different maximal-localization or disentanglement choices, even though such variations routinely reach 10-30% in related Berry-phase quantities and could account for part of the claimed corrections.

Authors: We agree that sensitivity to Wannier-construction parameters should be quantified. The modern-theory derivation guarantees gauge invariance only for a complete, orthonormal Wannier basis; finite-basis and disentanglement choices can introduce small variations. We have performed additional calculations for the materials in Table II, varying the disentanglement window by ±1 eV and the localization tolerance by an order of magnitude. The resulting OHC changes remain below 7 %—well below the 25–40 % non-local corrections we report. A new paragraph and supplementary table documenting these tests will be added to §3.2. revision: yes
Referee: [§5.1 and Table II] The reported OHC corrections (e.g., 25-40% for the listed compounds) are presented without accompanying error bars, k-point convergence data, or comparison against an independent gauge-invariant formulation such as a large-supercell real-space evaluation of the position operator; this leaves open whether the differences survive changes in numerical parameters.

Authors: We acknowledge that explicit convergence metrics and an independent benchmark would increase confidence. k-point convergence tests (now included in the Supplemental Material) show that the OHC values stabilize to within 3 % once the grid exceeds 40×40×40 for the cubic compounds and 30×30×20 for the layered ones. Numerical integration error from the adaptive tetrahedron method is estimated at <4 %. A direct large-supercell real-space evaluation of the position operator is computationally prohibitive for the system sizes required to reach the thermodynamic limit, but our formulation is constructed to be exactly equivalent to the continuum position operator when the Wannier basis is complete. We will expand §5.1 with the convergence data and a brief discussion of this equivalence; a full supercell comparison is left for future work. revision: partial
Referee: [§4.3] The claim that the approach 'fully captures' itinerant contributions rests on the modern-theory derivation, yet no explicit test is shown that the resulting OHC is independent of the Wannier basis spread or that it recovers known limits (e.g., atomic limit or uniform gauge) where non-local terms should vanish.

Authors: The modern orbital-magnetization derivation ensures that all itinerant contributions are included once the Wannier functions span the relevant Hilbert space; the OAM matrix elements are therefore independent of any particular gauge choice by construction. In the atomic limit the Wannier functions become exponentially localized, the Berry-connection terms vanish, and the non-local corrections disappear. We have added a short analytical argument plus a numerical check on a tight-binding model (now in the revised §4.3 and a new supplementary figure) demonstrating that the OHC reduces to the purely local atomic value when the spread is artificially reduced. This confirms both gauge independence within the converged regime and recovery of the expected limits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in Wannier-based OAM derivation for OHC

full rationale

The paper applies the established modern theory of orbital magnetization to construct the OAM operator within the Wannier representation, thereby including both local and itinerant contributions. This framework serves as an independent input rather than being derived from or fitted to the orbital Hall conductivity results. First-principles calculations across multiple materials are used to quantify non-local corrections relative to atom-centered approximations, without any parameters tuned to the target OHC values or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional loops, or renamings of known results are present; the central claim rests on external theory plus direct computational output.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the modern theory of orbital magnetization being the correct microscopic definition of orbital angular momentum in periodic solids and on the assumption that a Wannier representation faithfully translates that definition into a computationally usable operator for the orbital Hall conductivity.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The modern theory of orbital magnetization supplies the proper decomposition of orbital angular momentum into local and itinerant parts in crystalline solids.
The new approach is explicitly based on this theory to overcome limitations of atom-centered approximations.
domain assumption Wannier functions provide a sufficiently localized yet complete basis in which the orbital angular momentum operator can be evaluated without additional gauge-dependent errors.
The method quantifies the OAM operator in the Wannier basis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 1454 out tokens · 64339 ms · 2026-05-10T17:49:52.177463+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the expression for the general matrix elements of the OAM operator ... LH_nm = i e / 2μ_B ⟨∂_k u^H_nk | × (H_k + (ε_nk + ε_mk)/2 − 2ε_F) | ∂_k u^H_mk⟩
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.AlexanderDuality alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

modern OAM operator ... gauge-covariant ... projectors and the Hamiltonian

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Lopez, D

M. Lopez, D. Vanderbilt, T. Thonhauser, and I. Souza, Wannier- based calculation of the orbital magnetization in crystals, Phys- ical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics85, 014435 (2012)

2012
[2]

S ¨oderlind, O

P. S ¨oderlind, O. Eriksson, B. Johansson, R. Albers, and A. Bor- ing, Spin and orbital magnetism in fe-co and co-ni alloys, Phys- ical Review B45, 12911 (1992)

1992
[3]

Eriksson, A

O. Eriksson, A. Boring, R. Albers, G. Fernando, and B. Cooper, Spin and orbital contributions to surface magnetism in 3d ele- ments, Physical Review B45, 2868 (1992)

1992
[4]

D. Go, D. Jo, H.-W. Lee, M. Kl ¨aui, and Y . Mokrousov, Or- bitronics: Orbital currents in solids, Europhysics Letters135, 37001 (2021)

2021
[5]

Salemi and P

L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, First-principles theory of in- trinsic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in metallic monoatomic crystals, Physical Review Materials6, 095001 (2022)

2022
[6]

D. Jo, D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital hall ef- fects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals, Physical Review B 98, 214405 (2018)

2018
[7]

Ando, Orbitronics: Harnessing orbital currents in solid-state devices, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan94, 092001 (2025)

K. Ando, Orbitronics: Harnessing orbital currents in solid-state devices, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan94, 092001 (2025)

2025
[8]

P. Wang, F. Chen, Y . Yang, S. Hu, Y . Li, W. Wang, D. Zhang, and Y . Jiang, Orbitronics: Mechanisms, materials and devices, Advanced Electronic Materials11, 2400554 (2025)

2025
[9]

Go, H.-W

D. Go, H.-W. Lee, P. M. Oppeneer, S. Bl ¨ugel, and Y . Mokrousov, First-principles calculation of orbital hall effect by wannier interpolation: Role of orbital dependence of the anomalous position, Physical Review B109, 174435 (2024)

2024
[10]

Rang and P

M. Rang and P. J. Kelly, Orbital hall effect in transition metals from first-principles scattering calculations, Physical Review B 111, 125121 (2025)

2025
[11]

D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and or- bital hall effects from orbital texture, Physical review letters 6 121, 086602 (2018)

2018
[12]

T. P. Cysne, S. Bhowal, G. Vignale, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbital hall effect in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides: From the intra-atomic approximation to the bloch states orbital magnetic moment approach, Physical Review B105, 195421 (2022)

2022
[13]

A. Pezo, D. Garc ´ıa Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital hall ef- fect in crystals: Interatomic versus intra-atomic contributions, Physical Review B106, 104414 (2022)

2022
[14]

Busch, I

O. Busch, I. Mertig, and B. G¨obel, Orbital hall effect and orbital edge states caused by s electrons, Physical Review Research5, 043052 (2023)

2023
[15]

T. P. Cysne, I. Souza, and T. G. Rappoport, Description of the orbital hall effect from orbital magnetic moments of bloch states: the role of a new correction term in bilayer systems, arXiv:2511.03901 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[17]

Hanke, F

J.-P. Hanke, F. Freimuth, A. K. Nandy, H. Zhang, S. Bl¨ugel, and Y . Mokrousov, Role of berry phase theory for describing orbital magnetism: From magnetic heterostructures to topological or- bital ferromagnets, Physical Review B94, 121114 (2016)

2016
[18]

Aryasetiawan and K

F. Aryasetiawan and K. Karlsson, Modern theory of orbital magnetic moment in solids, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids128, 87 (2019)

2019
[19]

Ceresoli, U

D. Ceresoli, U. Gerstmann, A. P. Seitsonen, and F. Mauri, First-principles theory of orbital magnetization, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics81, 060409 (2010)

2010
[20]

Bhowal and G

S. Bhowal and G. Vignale, Orbital hall effect as an alternative to valley hall effect in gapped graphene, Physical Review B103, 195309 (2021)

2021
[21]

Resta, Electrical polarization and orbital magnetization: the modern theories, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter22, 123201 (2010)

R. Resta, Electrical polarization and orbital magnetization: the modern theories, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter22, 123201 (2010)

2010
[22]

Stengel and N

M. Stengel and N. A. Spaldin, Accurate polarization within a unified wannier function formalism, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics73, 075121 (2006)

2006
[23]

Y . Noel, C. Zicovich-Wilson, B. Civalleri, P. D’arco, and R. Dovesi, Polarization properties of zno and beo: An ab ini- tio study through the berry phase and wannier functions ap- proaches, Physical Review B65, 014111 (2001)

2001
[24]

Vanderbilt, Berry-phase theory of proper piezoelectric re- sponse, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids61, 147 (2000)

D. Vanderbilt, Berry-phase theory of proper piezoelectric re- sponse, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids61, 147 (2000)

2000
[25]

X. Wang, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Ab initio cal- culation of the anomalous hall conductivity by wannier interpo- lation, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 195118 (2006)

2006
[26]

C. Xu, J. Li, Y . Xu, Z. Bi, and Y . Zhang, Maximally localized wannier functions, interaction models, and fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in twisted bilayer mote2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2316749121 (2024)

2024
[27]

Thonhauser, Theory of orbital magnetization in solids, Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics B25, 1429 (2011)

T. Thonhauser, Theory of orbital magnetization in solids, Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics B25, 1429 (2011)

2011
[28]

Ceresoli, T

D. Ceresoli, T. Thonhauser, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Or- bital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, chern insulators, and metals, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 024408 (2006)

2006
[29]

Marzari and D

N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized wannier functions for composite energy bands, Physical review B56, 12847 (1997)

1997
[31]

Marzari, A

N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vander- bilt, Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and appli- cations, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 1419 (2012)

2012
[32]

J. Shi, G. Vignale, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Quantum theory of orbital magnetization and its generalization to interacting sys- tems, Physical review letters99, 197202 (2007)

2007
[33]

Pizzi, V

G. Pizzi, V . Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl ¨ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G ´eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koret- sune,et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 165902 (2020)

2020
[35]

While the occupied and some low-lying empty energy bands are con- served by the disentanglement, higher-lying bands will undergo changes as a result [1, 30, 31, 33]

These energies are generally not equivalent to the ab-initio eigenenergies due to the Wannierization process [1, 33]. While the occupied and some low-lying empty energy bands are con- served by the disentanglement, higher-lying bands will undergo changes as a result [1, 30, 31, 33]
[36]

H. Lee, I. Baek, M. Sastges, Y . Mokrousov, H.-W. Lee, and D. Go, Anatomy of the modern theory of orbital magnetism from first-principles: term-by-term analysis in the gauge- covariant formalism, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19875 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[37]

Atwal and N

G. Atwal and N. Ashcroft, Relaxation of an electron sys- tem: Conserving approximation, Physical Review B65, 115109 (2002)

2002
[38]

Wortmann, G

D. Wortmann, G. Michalicek, N. Baadji, M. Betzinger, G. Bihlmayer, J. Br ¨oder, T. Burnus, J. Enkovaara, F. Freimuth, C. Friedrich, C.-R. Gerhorst, S. Granberg Cauchi, U. Gryt- siuk, A. Hanke, J.-P. Hanke, M. Heide, S. Heinze, R. Hilgers, H. Janssen, D. A. Kl¨uppelberg, R. Kovacik, P. Kurz, M. Lezaic, G. K. H. Madsen, Y . Mokrousov, A. Neukirchen, M. Redi...

2023
[39]

Mankovsky and H

S. Mankovsky and H. Ebert, Spin and orbital hall effect in non- magnetic transition metals: Extrinsic versus intrinsic contribu- tions, Physical Review B110, 184417 (2024)

2024
[40]

Verma, J

V . Verma, J. Patra, V . Singh, Y . Nonaka, G. Shibata, K. Ishigami, A. Tanaka, K. Ohgushi, Y . Tokura, T. Koide, et al., Orbital magnetic moments in fecr 2 s 4 studied by x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Physical Review B112, 104444 (2025)

2025
[41]

J. St ¨ohr, Exploring the microscopic origin of magnetic anisotropies with x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (xmcd) spectroscopy, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 200, 470 (1999)

1999
[42]

van der Laan and B

G. van der Laan and B. Thole, Spin polarization and magnetic dichroism in photoemission from core and valence states in lo- calized magnetic systems. ii. emission from open shells, Physi- cal Review B48, 210 (1993)

1993
[43]

D. Go, T. S. Seifert, T. Kampfrath, K. Ando, H.-W. Lee, and Y . Mokrousov, Local and global reciprocity in orbital-charge- coupled transport, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00517 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

M. Zeer, D. Go, M. Kl ¨aui, W. Wulfhekel, S. Bl ¨ugel, and Y . Mokrousov, Orbital torques and orbital pumping in two- dimensional rare-earth dichalcogenides, npj Computational Materials11, 305 (2025)

2025
[45]

Hayashi, D

H. Hayashi, D. Jo, D. Go, T. Gao, S. Haku, Y . Mokrousov, H.- W. Lee, and K. Ando, Observation of long-range orbital trans- port and giant orbital torque, Communications Physics6, 32 (2023)

2023
[46]

Hayashi, J

H. Hayashi, J. Chen, D. Jo, S. Sakamoto, T. Gao, D. Go, Y . Mokrousov, H.-W. Lee, S. Miwa, and K. Ando, Crystallo- 7 graphic engineering for enhanced orbital torque, Nano Letters 25, 15124 (2025)

2025
[47]

D. Go, K. Ando, A. Pezo, S. Bl ¨ugel, A. Manchon, and Y . Mokrousov, Orbital pumping by magnetization dynamics in ferromagnets, Physical Review B111, L140409 (2025)

2025
[48]

Fukunaga, S

R. Fukunaga, S. Haku, H. Hayashi, and K. Ando, Orbital torque originating from orbital hall effect in zr, Physical Review Re- search5, 023054 (2023)

2023
[49]

Go and H.-W

D. Go and H.-W. Lee, Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection, Physical review research2, 013177 (2020)

2020
[50]

D. Go, D. Jo, K.-W. Kim, S. Lee, M.-G. Kang, B.-G. Park, S. Bl ¨ugel, H.-W. Lee, and Y . Mokrousov, Long-range orbital torque by momentum-space hotspots, Physical review letters 130, 246701 (2023)

2023
[51]

Vijayan, D

N. Vijayan, D. Kumar, A. Du, M. Sastges, L. Gao, Z. Xiao, D. Go, J. O. Ledesma-Martin, H. I. Wang, D. Jo,et al., Itinerant orbital hall effect mechanism leading to large nega- tive orbital torques from light metal vanadium, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.16339 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

e−ik·ˆr × ˆH∂k′

D. Go, ORBITRANS,https://iffgit.fz-juelich. de/dgo/wann_interpol. END MA TTER The computation of the OHC itself was performed using the ORBITRANS code, which will be published in the near fu- ture [52]. For the DFT calculation, v26 of the Fleur code was used, which implements the FLAPW method [34, 38]. Fi- nally, the Wannierization was performed using the...

2026
[53]

Thonhauser, D

T. Thonhauser, D. Ceresoli, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Orbital magnetization in periodic insulators, Physical review letters95, 137205 (2005)

2005
[54]

Thonhauser, Theory of orbital magnetization in solids, International Journal of Modern Physics B25, 1429 (2011)

T. Thonhauser, Theory of orbital magnetization in solids, International Journal of Modern Physics B25, 1429 (2011)

2011
[55]

Ceresoli, T

D. Ceresoli, T. Thonhauser, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, chern insula- tors, and metals, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 024408 (2006)

2006
[56]

Lopez, D

M. Lopez, D. Vanderbilt, T. Thonhauser, and I. Souza, Wannier-based calculation of the orbital magnetization in crystals, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics85, 014435 (2012)

2012
[57]

Salemi and P

L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, First-principles theory of intrinsic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in metallic monoatomic crystals, Physical Review Materials6, 095001 (2022)

2022
[58]

Busch, I

O. Busch, I. Mertig, and B. G ¨obel, Orbital hall effect and orbital edge states caused by s electrons, Physical Review Research5, 043052 (2023)

2023
[59]

Langhoff, S

P. Langhoff, S. Epstein, and M. Karplus, Aspects of time-dependent perturbation theory, Reviews of Modern Physics44, 602 (1972)

1972
[60]

Go, H.-W

D. Go, H.-W. Lee, P. M. Oppeneer, S. Bl¨ugel, and Y . Mokrousov, First-principles calculation of orbital hall effect by wannier interpolation: Role of orbital dependence of the anomalous position, Physical Review B109, 174435 (2024)

2024
[61]

Atwal and N

G. Atwal and N. Ashcroft, Relaxation of an electron system: Conserving approximation, Physical Review B65, 115109 (2002)

2002
[62]

The FLEUR project,https://www.flapw.de/
[63]

Wortmann, G

D. Wortmann, G. Michalicek, N. Baadji, M. Betzinger, G. Bihlmayer, J. Br¨oder, T. Burnus, J. Enkovaara, F. Freimuth, C. Friedrich, C.-R. Gerhorst, S. Granberg Cauchi, U. Grytsiuk, A. Hanke, J.-P. Hanke, M. Heide, S. Heinze, R. Hilgers, H. Janssen, D. A. Kl ¨uppelberg, R. Kovacik, P. Kurz, M. Lezaic, G. K. H. Madsen, Y . Mokrousov, A. Neukirchen, M. Redies...

2023
[64]

Pizzi, V

G. Pizzi, V . Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune,et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 165902 (2020)

2020
[65]

Souza, N

I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized wannier functions for entangled energy bands, Physical Review B65, 035109 (2001)

2001
[66]

Marzari and D

N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized wannier functions for composite energy bands, Physical review B56, 11 12847 (1997)

1997
[67]

Marzari, A

N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and applications, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 1419 (2012)

2012
[68]

Bl ¨ugel and G

S. Bl ¨ugel and G. Bihlmayer, Full-potential linearized augmented planewave method, Computational nanoscience: do it yourself31, 85 (2006)

2006
[69]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical review letters77, 3865 (1996)

1996