arxiv: 2604.09003 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Recent advances in modelling of global-scale collisions using smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Christian Reinhardt , Sabina D. Raducan , Thomas Meier , Martin Jutzi , Joachim Stadel , Ravit Helled

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP

keywords smoothed particle hydrodynamicsplanetary impactsasteroid collisionsself-gravitymaterial strengthsolar system formationporosity modeling

0 comments

The pith

Shear strength must be included alongside self-gravity in SPH models of several-hundred-kilometer bodies to explain Solar System impact outcomes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews impact regimes across Solar System bodies and shows that small objects require detailed material properties like shear strength, porosity, and crack formation in simulations, while very large bodies can be treated as fluids dominated by self-gravity and equations of state. For the intermediate range of several hundred kilometers, where bodies are already spheroidal from gravity but strength still matters, the models become especially difficult and are frequently omitted. Recent SPH advances are presented as tools that, combined with observations, can fill this gap and improve understanding of how impacts shaped asteroids, comets, and planetary formation.

Core claim

For bodies of several hundred kilometres, which are already spheroidal due to self-gravity, shear strength must still be considered in SPH impact simulations; this regime is the most challenging and often overlooked, yet accurate modeling of strength, porosity, and cracks alongside gravity is required to connect simulations to observations of Solar System objects.

What carries the argument

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) adapted for self-gravitating bodies with material strength, porosity, and equation-of-state terms to handle different size regimes.

If this is right

Impact outcomes on asteroids and comets can be predicted more reliably once strength is retained in SPH codes for the intermediate regime.
Models of solar system formation gain constraints from matching observed asteroid families and crater records to strength-gravity simulations.
The overlooked intermediate regime can now be systematically explored with current SPH implementations rather than approximated as pure fluid or pure strength cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Extending these SPH setups to include thermal effects or variable porosity could test whether certain observed asteroid porosities require specific impact histories.
Coupling the reviewed SPH results with N-body planet-formation codes would allow direct tracing of how individual collisions influence final planet compositions.
Laboratory experiments on intermediate-scale analogs could be designed to target the exact parameter space where current SPH predictions remain most uncertain.

Load-bearing premise

That the reviewed SPH simulations and observations together give a sufficiently complete picture of the intermediate-size regime where both strength and gravity operate at once.

What would settle it

A spacecraft measurement or crater observation on a 200–500 km body whose shape, ejecta, or internal structure contradicts the outcomes of strength-inclusive SPH runs for the same impact conditions.

read the original abstract

Impacts play a fundamental role in shaping the physical and chemical properties of the objects in our Solar System. Given the challenges in replicating such collisions through laboratory experiments, computer simulations are an important tool to investigate their outcomes. Accurately modelling material properties such as shear strength, porosity, and the formation of cracks is crucial for understanding impacts on small bodies like asteroids and comets. Very large and massive objects are dominated by self-gravity and can be approximated as a fluid. In this regime the equation of state used to model the behaviour of the constituent materials plays a key role. However, for bodies of several hundred kilometres, which are already spheroidal due to self-gravity, shear strength must still be considered. This impact regime is most challenging to model and therefore often overlooked in publications. In this review we present different impact regimes and the relevant physics that must be included. We then discuss their application to a variety of Solar System objects and assess how recent observations and numerical simulations, focussing on the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics method, can be used to inform our understanding of impact processes and solar system formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a review that organizes SPH impact modeling across size regimes without adding new results or techniques.

read the letter

This review paper brings together recent work on using smoothed particle hydrodynamics to model large-scale collisions in the Solar System. It adds no new simulations or theoretical advances, but it provides a structured overview of the field. What stands out is how it separates the impact regimes based on size. Small bodies require detailed treatment of strength, porosity, and fracturing. Large ones can be treated as fluids where the equation of state dominates. The paper correctly flags the several hundred km scale as particularly difficult because gravity and strength both matter, and it notes this area gets less attention. It then connects these models to specific Solar System bodies and uses observations to inform formation scenarios. The paper handles the material well by focusing on SPH implementations and their applications. This synthesis helps readers see how simulations have progressed and where they inform real data from missions or observations. Soft spots are mostly around scope. As a review, it might emphasize SPH at the expense of other numerical methods, though the title makes that choice explicit. The assessment of how complete the picture is for the intermediate regime depends on the cited papers, and without deeper checks it's hard to say if all key references are included. Nothing in the presented material suggests major omissions or errors in the core claims. This is useful for people studying planetary formation, asteroid impacts, or numerical methods in astrophysics who want a consolidated reference. A specialist already deep in SPH might not gain much new, but broader readers will. I recommend putting it through peer review. The topic is relevant, the structure is clear, and referees can help ensure the literature coverage is thorough.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. This review paper summarizes recent advances in smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) modeling of global-scale collisions relevant to Solar System objects. It categorizes impact regimes into strength-dominated (small bodies, emphasizing shear strength, porosity, cracks), gravity-dominated (large bodies, fluid approximation with equation of state), and the intermediate regime (hundreds of km bodies requiring both). The manuscript discusses applications to various Solar System bodies and evaluates how SPH simulations combined with observations contribute to understanding impact processes and solar system formation.

Significance. The review is significant for its focus on the challenging intermediate-size regime that is often overlooked, providing a synthesis of SPH techniques and their application to material properties in impacts. By highlighting the need for accurate modeling of strength and gravity together, it can guide future research in planetary formation and evolution. The paper credits the role of SPH in bridging simulations and observations without introducing new data or derivations.

minor comments (1)

The motivation that the several-hundred-km regime is 'most challenging to model and therefore often overlooked in publications' (abstract and introduction) would be strengthened by adding a brief quantitative note or citations on recent publication trends in SPH impact modeling; this is a presentation issue rather than a load-bearing error.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive review of our manuscript. The referee's summary and significance assessment accurately reflect the scope and intent of the paper, particularly its emphasis on the challenging intermediate-size regime for SPH modeling of impacts. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and are pleased that the work is viewed as a useful synthesis for guiding future research in planetary formation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review paper with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a literature review that surveys existing SPH simulations, impact regimes (strength-dominated, gravity-dominated, and intermediate), and observations for Solar System bodies. No new derivations, first-principles results, predictions, or fitted models are presented that could reduce to inputs by construction. All claims are synthesized from cited external work, with the intermediate regime noted as challenging but without any internal equation chain or self-referential justification. The paper is self-contained as a synthesis and carries no circularity burden.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies on standard physics already established in the planetary science literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5510 in / 966 out tokens · 24035 ms · 2026-05-10T17:49:29.207763+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

However, for bodies of several hundred kilometres, which are already spheroidal due to self-gravity, shear strength must still be considered. This impact regime is most challenging to model and therefore often overlooked in publications.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The second pillar is the equation of state which relates the pressure to the density and internal energy... The last pillar is constitutive (or rheological) models that describe the materials deformation (strain) due to the deviatoric component of stress.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages

[1]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 378, 245–275

Agertz, O., Moore, B., Stadel, J., Potter, D., Miniati, F., Read, J., Mayer, L., Gawryszczak, A., Kravtsov, A., Nordlund, A., Pearce, F., Quilis, V., Rudd, D., Springel, V., Stone, J., Tasker, E., Teyssier, R., Wadsley, J., Walder, R.: Fundamental differences between SPH and grid methods. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society380(3), 963–978 (2...

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12183.x 2007
[2]

Icarus142(1), 219–237 (1999)

Agnor, C.B., Canup, R.M., Levison, H.F.: On the Character and Consequences of Large Im- pacts in the Late Stage of Terrestrial Planet Formation. Icarus142(1), 219–237 (1999). DOI 10.1006/icar.1999.6201. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0019103599962012

work page doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6201 1999
[3]

, keywords =

Aguichine, A., Mousis, O., Devouard, B., Ronnet, T.: Rocklines as Cradles for Refractory Solids in the Protosolar Nebula. The Astrophysical Journal901(2), 97 (2020). DOI 10.3847/ 1538-4357/abaf47. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abaf47. Publisher: American Astronomical Society

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abaf47 2020
[5]

doi:10.1038/ngeo2189

Asphaug, E., Reufer, A.: Mercury and other iron-rich planetary bodies as relics of inefficient accretion. Nature Geoscience7(8), 564–568 (2014). DOI 10.1038/ngeo2189. URLhttp: //www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n8/full/ngeo2189.html

work page doi:10.1038/ngeo2189 2014
[6]

Nature Astronomy8(6), 748–755 (2024)

Ballantyne, H.A., Asphaug, E., Denton, C.A., Emsenhuber, A., Jutzi, M.: Sputnik Planitia as an impactor remnant indicative of an ancient rocky mascon in an oceanless Pluto. Nature Astronomy8(6), 748–755 (2024). DOI 10.1038/s41550-024-02248-1

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02248-1 2024
[7]

Icarus392, 115395 (2023)

Ballantyne, H.A., Jutzi, M., Golabek, G.J., Mishra, L., Cheng, K.W., Rozel, A.B., Tackley, P.J.: Investigating the feasibility of an impact-induced Martian Dichotomy. Icarus392, 115395 (2023). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115395

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115395 2023
[8]

A.\ 2007.\ The Origin of Mercury.\ Space Science Reviews 132, 189–202

Benz, W., Anic, A., Horner, J., Whitby, J.A.: The Origin of Mercury. Space Science Reviews 132(2-4), 189–202 (2007). DOI 10.1007/s11214-007-9284-1 Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 21

work page doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9284-1 2007
[9]

Benz, W., Asphaug, E.: Impact Simulations with Fracture. I. Method and Tests. Icarus107(1), 98–116 (1994). DOI 10.1006/icar.1994.1009

work page doi:10.1006/icar.1994.1009 1994
[10]

Benz, W., Asphaug, E.: Simulations of brittle solids using smooth particle hydrodynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun87(1), 253–265 (1995)

1995
[11]

Icarus81(1), 113–131 (1989)

Benz, W., Cameron, A.G.W., Melosh, H.J.: The origin of the Moon and the single-impact hypothesis III. Icarus81(1), 113–131 (1989). DOI 10.1016/0019-1035(89)90129-2. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0019103589901292

work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90129-2 1989
[12]

Icarus66(3), 515–535 (1986)

Benz, W., Slattery, W.L., Cameron, A.G.W.: The origin of the moon and the single-impact hypothesis I. Icarus66(3), 515–535 (1986). DOI 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90088-6. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0019103586900886

work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90088-6 1986
[13]

Icarus71(1), 30–45 (1987)

Benz, W., Slattery, W.L., Cameron, A.G.W.: The origin of the Moon and the single-impact hypothesis, II. Icarus71(1), 30–45 (1987). DOI 10.1016/0019-1035(87)90160-6. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0019103587901606

work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(87)90160-6 1987
[14]

Bottke, W.F., Broˇ z, M., O’Brien, D.P., Campo Bagatin, A., Morbidelli, A., Marchi, S.: The Collisional Evolution of the Main Asteroid Belt. In: P. Michel, F.E. DeMeo, W.F. Bottke (eds.) Asteroids IV, pp. 701–724. University of Arizona Press (2015). DOI 10.2458/ azu uapress 9780816532131-ch036

2015
[15]

2008, A&A, 492,

Bottke, W.F., Durda, D.D., Nesvorn´ y, D., Jedicke, R., Morbidelli, A., Vokrouhlick´ y, D., Levison, H.: The fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt. Icarus175(1), 111–140 (2005). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.026. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0019103504003811

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.026 2005
[16]

Procedia Engineering58, 461–470 (2013)

Brundage, A.L.: Implementation of Tillotson Equation of State for Hypervelocity Impact of Metals, Geologic Materials, and Liquids. Procedia Engineering58, 461–470 (2013). DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.053. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1877705813009594

work page doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.053 2013
[17]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03239

Bussmann, M., Reinhardt, C., Gillmann, C., Meier, T., Stadel, J., Tackley, P., Helled, R.: The possibility of a giant impact on venus (2025). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03239

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Lunar and Planetary Science Conference7, 120 (1976)

Cameron, A.G.W., Ward, W.R.: The Origin of the Moon. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference7, 120 (1976)

1976
[19]

AI Feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression.Science Advances, 6(16):eaay2631, 2020

Canup, R., Salmon, J.: Origin of Phobos and Deimos by the impact of a Vesta-to-Ceres sized body with Mars. Science Advances4(4), eaar6887 (2018). DOI 10.1126/sciadv. aar6887. URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aar6887. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv 2018
[20]

Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 42(1), 441–475 (2004)

Canup, R.M.: Dynamics of Lunar Formation. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 42(1), 441–475 (2004). DOI 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082201.113457. URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082201.113457

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082201.113457 2004
[21]

Icarus168(2), 433–456 (2004)

Canup, R.M.: Simulations of a late lunar-forming impact. Icarus168(2), 433–456 (2004). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.028

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.028 2004
[22]

Sci- ence338(6110), 1052 (2012)

Canup, R.M.: Forming a Moon with an Earth-like Composition via a Giant Impact. Sci- ence338(6110), 1052 (2012). DOI 10.1126/science.1226073. URLhttps://ui.adsabs. harvard.edu/abs/2012Sci...338.1052C/abstract

work page doi:10.1126/science.1226073 2012
[23]

Nature412(6848), 708–712 (2001)

Canup, R.M., Asphaug, E.: Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth’s formation. Nature412(6848), 708–712 (2001). DOI 10.1038/35089010

work page doi:10.1038/35089010 2001
[24]

Icarus152(2), 205–224 (2001)

Chambers, J.E.: Making More Terrestrial Planets. Icarus152(2), 205–224 (2001). DOI 10. 1006/icar.2001.6639. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0019103501966394

work page arXiv 2001
[25]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad8b0

Chau, A., Reinhardt, C., Helled, R., Stadel, J.: Forming Mercury by Giant Impacts. The Astrophysical Journal865(1), 35 (2018). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aad8b0. URLhttp: //stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/865/i=1/a=35

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad8b0 2018
[26]

DOI 10.1093/mnras/staa4021

Chau, A., Reinhardt, C., Izidoro, A., Stadel, J., Helled, R.: Could Uranus and Neptune form by collisions of planetary embryos? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502(2), 1647–1660 (2021). DOI 10.1093/mnras/staa4021. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/staa4021 22 Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa4021 2021
[27]

Icarus420, 116137 (2024)

Cheng, K.W., Ballantyne, H.A., Golabek, G.J., Jutzi, M., Rozel, A.B., Tackley, P.J.: Combined impact and interior evolution models in three dimensions indicate a southern impact origin of the Martian Dichotomy. Icarus420, 116137 (2024). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116137. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103524001970

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116137 2024
[28]

Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)119(12), 2600–2619 (2014)

Collins, G.S.: Numerical simulations of impact crater formation with dilatancy. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)119(12), 2600–2619 (2014). DOI 10.1002/2014JE004708

work page doi:10.1002/2014je004708 2014
[29]

Collins, G.S., Melosh, H.J.: Improvements to ANEOS for Multiple Phase Transitions. p. 2664 (2014). URLhttps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014LPI....45.2664C. ADS Bibcode: 2014LPI....45.2664C

2014
[30]

S., Melosh, H

Collins, G.S., Melosh, H.J., Ivanov, B.A.: Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations. Meteorit. Planet. Sci39(2), 217–231 (2004). DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004. tb00337.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004 2004
[31]

DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ab50b9

Deng, H., Ballmer, M.D., Reinhardt, C., Meier, M.M.M., Mayer, L., Stadel, J., Benitez, F.: Primordial Earth Mantle Heterogeneity Caused by the Moon-forming Giant Impact? The Astrophysical Journal887(2), 211 (2019). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ab50b9. URL https://doi.org/10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fab50b9

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab50b9 2019
[32]

The Astrophysical Journal 870(2), 127 (2019)

Deng, H., Reinhardt, C., Benitez, F., Mayer, L., Stadel, J., Barr, A.C.: Enhanced Mixing in Giant Impact Simulations with a New Lagrangian Method. The Astrophysical Journal 870(2), 127 (2019). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf399. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847% 2F1538-4357%2Faaf399

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf399 2019
[33]

Nature Geoscience18(1), 37–43 (2025)

Denton, C.A., Asphaug, E., Emsenhuber, A., Melikyan, R.: Capture of an ancient Charon around Pluto. Nature Geoscience18(1), 37–43 (2025). DOI 10.1038/s41561-024-01612-0. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-024-01612-0. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page doi:10.1038/s41561-024-01612-0 2025
[34]

doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.017

Emsenhuber, A., Jutzi, M., Benz, W.: SPH calculations of Mars-scale collisions: The role of the equation of state, material rheologies, and numerical effects. Icarus301, 247–257 (2018). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.017

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.017 2018
[35]

DOI 10.1093/mnras/stad3007

Eriksson, L.E.J., Mol Lous, M.A.S., Shibata, S., Helled, R.: Can Uranus and Neptune form concurrently via pebble, gas, and planetesimal accretion? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society526(4), 4860–4876 (2023). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stad3007. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3007

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3007 2023
[36]

Icarus429, 116428 (2025)

Esteves, L., Izidoro, A., Winter, O.C.: Accretion of Uranus and Neptune: Confronting different giant impact scenarios. Icarus429, 116428 (2025). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116428. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103524004883

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116428 2025
[37]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters537(1), L14–L20 (2025)

Fang, T., Bi, R., Zhang, H., Zhou, Y., Reinhardt, C., Deng, H.: The moon-forming impact as a constraint for the inner Solar system’s formation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters537(1), L14–L20 (2025). DOI 10.1093/mnrasl/slae109. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slae109

work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slae109 2025
[38]

In: Completing the Inventory of the Solar System, vol

Farinella, P., Davis, D.R., Marzari, F.: Asteroid Families, Old and Young. In: Completing the Inventory of the Solar System, vol. 107, pp. 45–55 (1996). URLhttps://ui.adsabs. harvard.edu/abs/1996ASPC..107...45F

1996
[39]

Science312(5778), 1330–1334 (2006)

Fujiwara, A., Kawaguchi, J., Yeomans, D.K., Abe, M., Mukai, T., Okada, T., Saito, J., Yano, H., Yoshikawa, M., Scheeres, D.J., Barnouin-Jha, O., Cheng, A.F., Demura, H., Gaskell, R.W., Hirata, N., Ikeda, H., Kominato, T., Miyamoto, H., Nakamura, A.M., Nakamura, R., Sasaki, S., Uesugi, K.: The Rubble-Pile Asteroid Itokawa as Observed by Hayabusa. Science31...

work page doi:10.1126/science.1125841 2006
[40]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society181(3), 375– 389 (1977)

Gingold, R.A., Monaghan, J.J.: Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society181(3), 375– 389 (1977). DOI 10.1093/mnras/181.3.375. URLhttps://academic.oup.com/mnras/ article/181/3/375/988212. Publisher: Oxford Academic

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/181.3.375 1977
[41]

Icarus215(1), 346–357 (2011)

Golabek, G.J., Keller, T., Gerya, T.V., Zhu, G., Tackley, P.J., Connolly, J.A.D.: Origin of the martian dichotomy and Tharsis from a giant impact causing massive magma- Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 23 tism. Icarus215(1), 346–357 (2011). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.06.012. URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103511002211

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.06.012 2011
[42]

Icarus24(4), 504–515 (1975)

Hartmann, W.K., Davis, D.R.: Satellite-sized planetesimals and lunar origin. Icarus24(4), 504–515 (1975). DOI 10.1016/0019-1035(75)90070-6

work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(75)90070-6 1975
[43]

Journal of Geophysical Re- search: Planets118(6), 1204–1220 (2013)

Hauck, S.A., Margot, J.L., Solomon, S.C., Phillips, R.J., Johnson, C.L., Lemoine, F.G., Mazarico, E., McCoy, T.J., Padovan, S., Peale, S.J., Perry, M.E., Smith, D.E., Zuber, M.T.: The curious case of Mercury’s internal structure. Journal of Geophysical Re- search: Planets118(6), 1204–1220 (2013). DOI 10.1002/jgre.20091. URLhttps: //agupubs.onlinelibrary.w...

work page doi:10.1002/jgre.20091 2013
[44]

arXiv e-prints arXiv:2504.18219 (2025)

Helled, R.: Ice Giants. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2504.18219 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of Japan69(2), 26 (2017)

Hosono, N., Iwasawa, M., Tanikawa, A., Nitadori, K., Muranushi, T., Makino, J.: Un- convergence of very-large-scale giant impact simulations. Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of Japan69(2), 26 (2017). DOI 10.1093/pasj/psw131. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psw131

work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psw131 2017
[46]

Icarus271, 131–157 (2016)

Hosono, N., Saitoh, T.R., Makino, J., Genda, H., Ida, S.: The giant impact simulations with density independent smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Icarus271, 131–157 (2016). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.01.036. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0019103516000610

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.01.036 2016
[47]

Hyodo, R., Genda, H., Charnoz, S., Rosenblatt, P.: On the Impact Origin of Phobos and Deimos. I. Thermodynamic and Physical Aspects. The Astrophysical Journal845(2), 125 (2017). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81c4. URLhttp://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/ 845/i=2/a=125

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa81c4 2017
[48]

Astronomy & Astrophysics582, A99 (2015)

Izidoro, A., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S.N., Hersant, F., Pierens, A.: Accretion of Uranus and Neptune from inward-migrating planetary embryos blocked by Jupiter and Saturn. Astronomy & Astrophysics582, A99 (2015). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201425525. URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425525

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425525 2015
[49]

Jutzi, M.: SPH calculations of asteroid disruptions: The role of pressure dependent failure models. Planet. Space Sci107, 3–9 (2015). DOI 10.1016/j.pss.2014.09.012

work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.09.012 2015
[50]

Planetary and Space Science177, 104695 (2019)

Jutzi, M.: The shape and structure of small asteroids as a result of sub-catastrophic collisions. Planetary and Space Science177, 104695 (2019). DOI 10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.009. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063319300868

work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.009 2019
[51]

Nature476(7358), 69–72 (2011)

Jutzi, M., Asphaug, E.: Forming the lunar farside highlands by accretion of a companion moon. Nature476(7358), 69–72 (2011). DOI 10.1038/nature10289. URLhttps://www. nature.com/articles/nature10289. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page doi:10.1038/nature10289 2011
[52]

Science348(6241), 1355–1358 (2015)

Jutzi, M., Asphaug, E.: The shape and structure of cometary nuclei as a result of low- velocity accretion. Science348(6241), 1355–1358 (2015). DOI 10.1126/science.aaa4747. URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaa4747. Publisher: Ameri- can Association for the Advancement of Science

work page doi:10.1126/science.aaa4747 2015
[53]

Astronomy & Astrophysics597, A62 (2017)

Jutzi, M., Benz, W.: Formation of bi-lobed shapes by sub-catastrophic collisions - A late origin of comet 67P’s structure. Astronomy & Astrophysics597, A62 (2017). DOI 10. 1051/0004-6361/201628964. URLhttps://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2017/ 01/aa28964-16/aa28964-16.html. Publisher: EDP Sciences

2017
[54]

Implementing sub-resolution porosity in a 3D SPH Hydrocode

Jutzi, M., Benz, W., Michel, P.: Numerical simulations of impacts involving porous bodies: I. Implementing sub-resolution porosity in a 3D SPH Hydrocode. Icarus198(1), 242–255 (2008). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.06.013

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.06.013 2008
[55]

2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

Jutzi, M., Holsapple, K., W¨ unneman, K., Michel, P.: Modeling asteroid collisions and impact processes. arXiv:1502.01844 [astro-ph] (2015). DOI 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816532131-ch035. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01844

work page doi:10.2458/azu 2015
[56]

comparison with laboratory experiments

Jutzi, M., Michel, P., Hiraoka, K., Nakamura, A.M., Benz, W.: Numerical simulations of impacts involving porous bodies: II. comparison with laboratory experiments. Icarus201(2), 802–813 (2009). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.01.018

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.01.018 2009
[57]

Nature Communications13(1), 7134 (2022)

Jutzi, M., Raducan, S.D., Zhang, Y., Michel, P., Arakawa, M.: Constraining surface prop- erties of asteroid (162173) ryugu from numerical simulations of hayabusa2 mission impact experiment. Nature Communications13(1), 7134 (2022). DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-34540-x 24 Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34540-x 2022
[58]

Icarus252, 161–174 (2015)

Kaib, N.A., Cowan, N.B.: The feeding zones of terrestrial planets and insights into Moon formation. Icarus252, 161–174 (2015). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.01.013. URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103515000196

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.01.013 2015
[59]

The Astrophysical Journal Letters 937(2), L40 (2022)

Kegerreis, J.A., Ruiz-Bonilla, S., Eke, V.R., Massey, R.J., Sandnes, T.D., Teodoro, L.F.A.: Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 937(2), L40 (2022). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8d96. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10. 3847/2041-8213/ac8d96

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8d96 2022
[60]

A., et al.\ 2018, Consequences of Giant Impacts on Early Uranus, The Astrophysical Journal, 861, 52

Kegerreis, J.A., Teodoro, L.F.A., Eke, V.R., Massey, R.J., Catling, D.C., Fryer, C.L., Ko- rycansky, D.G., Warren, M.S., Zahnle, K.J.: Consequences of Giant Impacts on Early Uranus for Rotation, Internal Structure, Debris, and Atmospheric Erosion. The Astro- physical Journal861(1), 52 (2018). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aac725. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.3847%2F153...

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac725 2018
[61]

Icarus148(2), 419–436 (2000)

Kokubo, E., Ida, S., Makino, J.: Evolution of a Circumterrestrial Disk and Formation of a Single Moon. Icarus148(2), 419–436 (2000). DOI 10.1006/icar.2000.6496. URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103500964960

work page doi:10.1006/icar.2000.6496 2000
[62]

ichiro .\ 2019.\ The Exchange of Mass and Angular Momentum in the Impact Event of Ice Giant Planets: Implications for the Origin of Uranus.\ The Astronomical Journal 157

Kurosaki, K., Inutsuka, S.i.: The Exchange of Mass and Angular Momentum in the Impact Event of Ice Giant Planets: Implications for the Origin of Uranus. The Astronomical Journal 157(1), 13 (2018). DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf165. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847% 2F1538-3881%2Faaf165

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf165 2018
[63]

Nature Astronomy2(7), 555–561 (2018)

Leleu, A., Jutzi, M., Rubin, M.: The peculiar shapes of Saturn’s small inner moons as evidence of mergers of similar-sized moonlets. Nature Astronomy2(7), 555–561 (2018). DOI 10.1038/ s41550-018-0471-7. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-018-0471-7. Number: 7 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

2018
[64]

Earth and Planetary Science Letters15(3), 286–290 (1972)

Lewis, J.S.: Metal/silicate fractionation in the solar system. Earth and Planetary Science Letters15(3), 286–290 (1972). DOI 10.1016/0012-821X(72)90174-4. URLhttp://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0012821X72901744

work page doi:10.1016/0012-821x(72)90174-4 1972
[65]

Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering17(1), 25–76 (2010)

Liu, M.B., Liu, G.R.: Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH): an Overview and Recent De- velopments. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering17(1), 25–76 (2010). DOI 10.1007/s11831-010-9040-7. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-010-9040-7

work page doi:10.1007/s11831-010-9040-7 2010
[66]

Nature , author =

Liu, S.F., Hori, Y., M¨ uller, S., Zheng, X., Helled, R., Lin, D., Isella, A.: The formation of Jupiter’s diluted core by a giant impact. Nature572(7769), 355–357 (2019). DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1470-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1470-2 2019
[67]

B.\ 1977.\ A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis.\ The Astronomical Journal 82, 1013–1024

Lucy, L.B.: A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. The Astronomical Journal82, 1013–1024 (1977). DOI 10.1086/112164. URLhttp://adsabs.harvard. edu/abs/1977AJ.....82.1013L

work page doi:10.1086/112164 1977
[68]

International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts4(3), 269–272 (1967)

Lundborg, N.: The strength-size relation of granite. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts4(3), 269–272 (1967). DOI 10.1016/ 0148-9062(67)90011-3. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0148906267900113

work page arXiv 1967
[69]

Nature453(7199), 1216–1219 (2008)

Marinova, M.M., Aharonson, O., Asphaug, E.: Mega-impact formation of the Mars hemi- spheric dichotomy. Nature453(7199), 1216–1219 (2008). DOI 10.1038/nature07070. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nature07070

work page doi:10.1038/nature07070 2008
[70]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society469(3), 3597–3609 (2017)

Mastrobuono-Battisti, A., Perets, H.B.: The composition of Solar system asteroids and Earth/Mars moons, and the Earth–Moon composition similarity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society469(3), 3597–3609 (2017). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stx1054. URL https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/469/3/3597/3795552. Publisher: Ox- ford Academic

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1054 2017
[71]

[Manuscript in preparation]

Meier, T., Reinhardt, C., Potter, D., Stadel, J.: Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics in pkdgrav3 for planetary collision simulations (in prep.). [Manuscript in preparation]
[72]

The Astrophysical Journal988(1), 7 (2025)

Meier, T., Reinhardt, C., Shibata, S., M¨ uller, S., Stadel, J., Helled, R.: On the origin of jupiter’s fuzzy core: Constraints from n-body, impact, and evolution simulations. The Astrophysical Journal988(1), 7 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/addbe6. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/ 10.3847/1538-4357/addbe6

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addbe6 2025
[73]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society505(2), Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 25 1806–1816 (2021)

Meier, T., Reinhardt, C., Stadel, J.G.: The EOS/resolution conspiracy: Convergence in proto- planetary collision simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society505(2), Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 25 1806–1816 (2021). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stab1441. URLhttps://academic.oup.com/ mnras/article/505/2/1806/6279686

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1441 2021
[74]

Meier, T., Reinhardt, C., Timpe, M., Stadel, J., Moore, B.: A Systematic Survey of Moon- forming Giant Impacts. II. Rotating Bodies. The Astrophysical Journal978(1), 11 (2024). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9248. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ad9248. Publisher: The American Astronomical Society

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9248 2024
[75]

Research supported by NASA

Melosh, H.J.: Impact cratering: A geologic process. Research supported by NASA. New York, Oxford University Press (Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, No. 11), 1989, 253 p. (1989). URLhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989icgp.book.....M

1989
[76]

Meteoritics and Planetary Science 42, 2079–2098 (2007)

Melosh, H.J.: A hydrocode equation of state for SiO2. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 42, 2079–2098 (2007). DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01009.x. URLhttp://adsabs. harvard.edu/abs/2007M%26PS...42.2079M

work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01009.x 2079
[77]

J.\ 1992.\ Smoothed particle hydrodynamics..\ Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 30, 543–574

Monaghan, J.J.: Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics30, 543–574 (1992). DOI 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551. URL http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ARA%26A..30..543M

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551 1992
[78]

Icarus204(2), 558–573 (2009)

Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W.F., Nesvorn´ y, D., Levison, H.F.: Asteroids were born big. Icarus204(2), 558–573 (2009). DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.011. URLhttps://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103509003029

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.011 2009
[79]

Earth and Planetary Science Letters594, 117713 (2022)

Orm ¨o, J., Raducan, S.D., Jutzi, M., Herreros, M.I., Luther, R., Collins, G.S., W¨ unnemann, K., Mora-Rueda, M., Hamann, C.: Boulder exhumation and segregation by impacts on rubble- pile asteroids. Earth and Planetary Science Letters594, 117713 (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.epsl. 2022.117713

work page doi:10.1016/j.epsl 2022
[80]

Earth and Planetary Science Letters262(3), 438–449 (2007)

Pahlevan, K., Stevenson, D.J.: Equilibration in the aftermath of the lunar-forming giant impact. Earth and Planetary Science Letters262(3), 438–449 (2007). DOI 10.1016/ j.epsl.2007.07.055. URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0012821X07005006

2007
[81]

Meteoritics & Planetary Sci- ence43(12), 1917–1938 (2008)

Pierazzo, E., Artemieva, N., Asphaug, E., Baldwin, E.C., Cazamias, J., Coker, R., Collins, G.S., Crawford, D.A., Davison, T., Elbeshausen, D., Holsapple, K.A., Housen, K.R., Ko- rycansky, D.G., W¨ unnemann, K.: Validation of numerical codes for impact and explo- sion cratering: Impacts on strengthless and metal targets. Meteoritics & Planetary Sci- ence43...

work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00653.x 1917

Showing first 80 references.