pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09384 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantum Uncertainty and Entropy

Giovanni Chesi , Lorenzo Maccone
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum uncertaintyuncertainty relationsentropy uncertaintyHeisenberg principlequantum complementarityquantum metrologyquantum cryptography
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum mechanics hosts a range of uncertainty relations using both variances and entropies with foundational and practical implications.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the various uncertainty relations appearing in quantum mechanics along with their specific characteristics. It explores how these relations help define and understand complementarity between observables. Applications are shown in both fundamental physics and in technologies like metrology and cryptography. Both traditional variance-based and newer entropy-based forms of uncertainty are examined in detail. Readers interested in quantum foundations or information science would find value in seeing how these limits constrain quantum systems.

Core claim

We review the plethora of uncertainty relations that appear in quantum mechanics and their nuances. We present both foundational applications, e.g. in understanding and defining complementarity, and practical applications, e.g. in quantum metrology and cryptography. Both variance- and entropy-based uncertainties are covered here.

What carries the argument

The uncertainty relations themselves, which come in variance form (like the Heisenberg relation) and entropy form (like the Maassen-Uffink relation), serving to quantify incompatibilities between quantum observables.

If this is right

  • These relations clarify the concept of complementarity in quantum theory.
  • They provide bounds useful for optimizing quantum measurement strategies in metrology.
  • Security proofs in quantum key distribution rely on such uncertainty principles.
  • Entropy-based versions can give stronger constraints in information processing tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future work might derive new uncertainty relations tailored to specific quantum technologies.
  • Connections to other areas like quantum thermodynamics could be explored using these relations.
  • Experimental tests in high-precision setups could validate or refine the reviewed bounds.

Load-bearing premise

The review's selection of literature and mathematical details accurately represents the full range of uncertainty relations in quantum mechanics.

What would settle it

Discovery of a major uncertainty relation or a nuance not included in the review, or a mathematical error in the presented relations, would falsify its claim to comprehensive coverage.

read the original abstract

We review the plethora of uncertainty relations that appear in quantum mechanics and their nuances. We present both foundational applications, e.g. in understanding and defining complementarity, and practical applications, e.g. in quantum metrology and cryptography. Both variance- and entropy-based uncertainties are covered here.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review surveying the landscape of uncertainty relations in quantum mechanics. It covers both variance-based relations (such as the Heisenberg and Robertson-Schrödinger forms) and entropy-based relations (including Shannon, Rényi, and Tsallis entropies), discussing their mathematical nuances, trade-offs, and interpretations. The authors examine foundational applications, particularly in formalizing complementarity, as well as practical uses in quantum metrology (e.g., precision bounds) and quantum cryptography (e.g., security proofs).

Significance. If the review accurately and representatively synthesizes the literature, it would provide a consolidated reference for a central topic in quantum information. Uncertainty relations underpin many results in quantum foundations and technologies; a clear, balanced overview spanning variance and entropic measures could aid researchers working across these areas. The manuscript does not introduce new derivations or predictions, so its value lies in organization and accessibility rather than novelty of results.

minor comments (3)
  1. The introduction would benefit from a brief roadmap outlining the structure of the review (e.g., which sections treat variance vs. entropy relations and how applications are organized) to improve navigability for readers.
  2. Some figures comparing different uncertainty bounds (e.g., variance vs. entropic) appear to use inconsistent axis scaling or labeling conventions; ensure uniformity so that visual comparisons are unambiguous.
  3. A small number of citations to post-2020 works on entropic uncertainty relations in continuous-variable systems appear to be missing; adding them would strengthen the claim of covering recent developments in metrology applications.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a review of uncertainty relations in quantum mechanics and for recommending minor revision. We appreciate the recognition of its potential value as a consolidated reference spanning variance-based and entropy-based approaches, along with their foundational and practical applications.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no new derivations or predictions

full rationale

The paper is a review that summarizes existing uncertainty relations (variance- and entropy-based) and their applications in complementarity, metrology, and cryptography. It presents no original derivations, parameter fits, predictions, or mathematical steps that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. All claims reference prior published results without self-referential fitting or load-bearing self-citations that would create circularity. The central claim requires only representative selection of literature, which is independent of any internal derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the work introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies entirely on previously published results in quantum mechanics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5315 in / 1119 out tokens · 48969 ms · 2026-05-10T17:07:09.375584+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tight Entropic Uncertainty Relations

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A parameterized state-independent entropic uncertainty bound γ_s that is strictly better than Maassen-Uffink and asymptotically tight for all observables as s approaches 2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    F., 2015

    Abdelkhalek, R., Schwonnek, R., Maassen, H., Furrer, F., Duhme, J., Raynal, P., Englert, B.-G., and Werner, R. F., 2015. Optimality of entropic uncertainty relations. Int. J. Quantum Inform. 13, 1550045

    2015

  2. [2]

    Aharonov, Y., and Bohm, D. 1961. Time in the Quantum Theory and the Uncertainty Relation for Time and Energy. Phys. Rev. 122, 1649-1658

    1961

  3. [3]

    Information measures and capacity of order alpha for discrete memoryless channels

    Arimoto, S., 1977. Information measures and capacity of order alpha for discrete memoryless channels. Topics in Information Theory, ser. Colloq. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai 16, I. Csiszar and P. Elias, Eds., Amsterdam, North Holland, 41–52

    1977

  4. [4]

    A., and Wehner, S., 2007

    Ballester, M. A., and Wehner, S., 2007. Entropic uncertainty relations and locking: Tight bounds for mutually unbiased bases. Phys. Rev. A 75, 022319

    2007

  5. [5]

    Inequalities in Fourier Analysis

    Beckner, W., 1975. Inequalities in Fourier Analysis. Ann. Math. 102, 159-182

    1975

  6. [6]

    H., and Brassard, G., 1984

    Bennett, C. H., and Brassard, G., 1984. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing 1, 175–179

    1984

  7. [7]

    H., Brassard, G., and Mermin, N

    Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., and Mermin, N. D., 1992. Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 557-559

    1992

  8. [8]

    S., Fillippov, S

    Bellini, M., Coelho, A. S., Fillippov, S. N., Man’ko V. I., and Zavatta, A., 2012. Towards higher precision and operational use of optical homodyne tomograms. Phys. Rev. A 85, 052129

    2012

  9. [9]

    M., and Renner, R., 2010

    Berta, M., Christandl, M., Colbeck, R., Renes, J. M., and Renner, R., 2010. The uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memory. Nature Phys. 6, 659–662

    2010

  10. [10]

    S., 2025

    Bhunia, P., and Moslehian, M. S., 2025. An improvement of Schr\" o dinger's uncertainty relation. Phys. Lett. A 552, 130663

    2025

  11. [11]

    Uncertainty Relations for Information Entropy in Wave Mechanics

    Bia ynicki-Birula, I., and Miycielski, J., 1975. Uncertainty Relations for Information Entropy in Wave Mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys. 44, 129-132

    1975

  12. [12]

    The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory

    Bohr, N., 1928. The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature 121, 580-590

    1928

  13. [13]

    Finite-key security analysis for multilevel quantum key distribution

    Br\' a dler, K., Mirhosseini, M., Fickler, R., Broadbent, A., and Boyd, R., 2016. Finite-key security analysis for multilevel quantum key distribution. New. J. Phys. 18, 073030

    2016

  14. [14]

    L., and Caves, M

    Braunstein, S. L., and Caves, M. C., 1994. Statistical Distance and the Geometry of Quantum States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439–3443

    1994

  15. [15]

    L., Carlton, M

    Braunstein, S. L., Carlton, M. C., and Milburn, G. J., 1996. Generalized Uncertainty Relations: Theory, Examples, and Lorentz Invariance. Ann. Phys. 247, 135–173

    1996

  16. [16]

    All Mutually Unbiased Bases in Dimensions Two to Five

    Brierley, S., Weigert, S., and Bengtsson, I., 2010. All Mutually Unbiased Bases in Dimensions Two to Five. Quantum Inf. Comput. 10, 0803

    2010

  17. [17]

    Optimal Eavesdropping in Quantum Cryptography with Six States

    Bru , D., 1998. Optimal Eavesdropping in Quantum Cryptography with Six States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3018-3021

    1998

  18. [18]

    Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

    Bush, P., Heinonen, T., and Lahti, P., 2003. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Phys. Rep. 452, 155 - 176

    2003

  19. [19]

    Smoothing probability distributions and smooth entropy

    Cachin, C., and Maurer, U., 1997. Smoothing probability distributions and smooth entropy. Proc. IEEE ISIT, 91

    1997

  20. [20]

    Smooth Entropy and Rényi Entropy

    Cachin, C., 1997. Smooth Entropy and Rényi Entropy. Adv. in Cryptology EUROCRYPT ’97, LNCS 1233, 193-208

    1997

  21. [21]

    Sum uncertainty relations for arbitrary N incompatible observables

    Chen, B., and Fei, S.-M., 2015. Sum uncertainty relations for arbitrary N incompatible observables. Scientific Rep. 5, 14238

    2015

  22. [22]

    Variance-based uncertainty relations for incompatible observables

    Chen, B., Cao, N.-P., Fei, S.-M., and Long, G.-L., 2016. Variance-based uncertainty relations for incompatible observables. Quantum Inf. Process.. 15, 3909 - 3917

    2016

  23. [23]

    N., and Man’ko, V

    Chernega, V. N., and Man’ko, V. I., 2011. Probability Representation and State-Extended Uncertainty Relations. J. Russ. Laser Res. 32, 125 - 129

    2011

  24. [24]

    Uncertainty, Monogamy, and Locking of Quantum Correlations

    Christandl, M., and Winter, A., 2005. Uncertainty, Monogamy, and Locking of Quantum Correlations. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51, 3159-3165

    2005

  25. [25]

    N., 2012

    Chernega, V. N., 2012. How can we check the uncertainty relation? Phys. Scr. 014006

    2012

  26. [26]

    N., and Man’ko V

    Chernega, V. N., and Man’ko V. I., 2012. State-Extended Uncertainty Relations and Tomographic Inequalities as Quantum System State Characteristic. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 10, 1241017

    2012

  27. [27]

    J., Yu, L., Gheorghiu, V., and Griffiths, R., 2011

    Coles, P. J., Yu, L., Gheorghiu, V., and Griffiths, R., 2011. Information-theoretic treatment of tripartite systems and quantum channels. Phys. Rev. A 86, 062338

    2011

  28. [28]

    J., Colbeck, R., Yu, L., and Zwolag, M., 2012

    Coles, P. J., Colbeck, R., Yu, L., and Zwolag, M., 2012. Uncertainty Relations from Simple Entropic Properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 210405

    2012

  29. [29]

    J., and Piani, M., 2014

    Coles, P. J., and Piani, M., 2014. Improved entropic uncertainty relations and information exclusion relations. Phys. Rev. A 89, 022112

    2014

  30. [30]

    J., Berta, M., Tomamichel, M., and Wehner, S., 2017

    Coles, P. J., Berta, M., Tomamichel, M., and Wehner, S., 2017. Entropic uncertainty relations and their applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015002

    2017

  31. [31]

    K., 2000

    Coffman, V., Kundu, J., and Wootters, W. K., 2000. Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306

    2000

  32. [32]

    Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton University Press

    Cramér, H., 1946. Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton University Press

    1946

  33. [33]

    F., 2015

    Dammeier, L., Schwonnek, R., and Werner, R. F., 2015. Uncertainty relations for angular momentum. New J. Phys. 17, 093046

    2015

  34. [34]

    M., 2003

    D'Ariano, G. M., 2003. On the Heisenberg principle, namely on the information-disturbance trade-off in a quantum measurement. Fortschr. Phys. 51, 318-330

    2003

  35. [35]

    Smooth entropies and the quantum information spectrum

    Datta, N., and Renner, R., 2009. Smooth entropies and the quantum information spectrum. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55, 2807-2815

    2009

  36. [36]

    de Guise, H., Maccone, L., Sanders, B. C. and Shukla, N., 2018. State-independent uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. A 98, 042121

    2018

  37. [37]

    I., and S\'anchez-Ruiz, J., 2008

    de Vicente, J. I., and S\'anchez-Ruiz, J., 2008. Improved bounds on entropic uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. A 77, 042110

    2008

  38. [38]

    Uncertainty in Quantum Measurements

    Deutsch, D., 1983. Uncertainty in Quantum Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 631-633

    1983

  39. [39]

    Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states

    Devetak, I., and Winter, A., 2005. Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states. Proc. R. Soc. A 461, 207-235

    2005

  40. [40]

    Dodonov, V. V. 2025. Variance-Based Uncertainty Relations: A Concise Review of Inequalities Discovered Since 1927. Quantum Rep. 7, 34-95

    2025

  41. [41]

    Om mutually unbiased bases

    Durt, T., Englert, B.-G., Bengtsson, I., and \.Zyczkowski, K., 2010. Om mutually unbiased bases. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 8, 535 - 640

    2010

  42. [42]

    and Tosini, A., 2024

    Erba, M., Perinotti, P., Rolino, D. and Tosini, A., 2024. Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance. Phys. Rev. A 109, 022239

    2024

  43. [43]

    K., 1991

    Ekert, A. K., 1991. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661-663

    1991

  44. [44]

    The mean king's problem: prime degrees of freedom

    Englert, B.-G., and Aharonov, Y., 2001. The mean king's problem: prime degrees of freedom. Phys. Lett. A 284, 1 - 5

    2001

  45. [45]

    Mathematical Methods of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York

    Fano, G., 1971. Mathematical Methods of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York

    1971

  46. [46]

    Fehr, S., and Berens, S. 2014. On the conditional Rényi entropies. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 60, 6801-6810

    2014

  47. [47]

    Ferraro, A., Olivares, S., and Paris, M. G. A., 2005. Gaussian states in continuous variable quantum information. arXiv:quant-ph/0503237

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  48. [48]

    L., and Lieb, E

    Frank, R. L., and Lieb, E. H., 2012. Entropy and the Uncertainty Principle. Ann. Henri Poincaré 13, 1711–1717

    2012

  49. [49]

    L., and Lieb, E

    Frank, R. L., and Lieb, E. H., 2013. Extended Quantum Conditional Entropy and Quantum Uncertainty Inequalities. Commun. Math. Phys. 323, 487–495

    2013

  50. [50]

    Gaussian states as minimum uncertainty states

    Fu, S., Luo, S., and Zhang, Y., 2020. Gaussian states as minimum uncertainty states. Phys. Lett. A 384, 126037

    2020

  51. [51]

    An optimal entropic uncertainty relation in a two-dimensional Hilbert space

    Ghirardi, G., Marinatto, L., and Romano, R., 2003. An optimal entropic uncertainty relation in a two-dimensional Hilbert space. Phys. Lett. A 317, 32-36

    2003

  52. [52]

    Quantum limits to dynamical evolution

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., and Maccone, L., 2003. Quantum limits to dynamical evolution. Phys. Rev. A 67, 052109

    2003

  53. [53]

    Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., and Maccone, L., 2004. Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit. Science 306, 1330-1336

    2004

  54. [54]

    Quantum metrology

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., and Maccone, L., 2006. Quantum metrology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401

    2006

  55. [55]

    Quantum Cryptography: from Key Distribution to Conference Key Agreement, Springer Cham

    Grasselli, F., 2021. Quantum Cryptography: from Key Distribution to Conference Key Agreement, Springer Cham

    2021

  56. [56]

    Entanglement Detection

    G\"uhne, O., and T\'oth, G., 2009. Entanglement Detection. Phys. Rep. 474, 1-75

    2009

  57. [57]

    C., 2022

    He, K., and How, J. C., 2022. Applying the Theory of Numerical Radius of Operators to Obtain Multi-observable Quantum Uncertainty Relations. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 38, 1241- 1254

    2022

  58. [58]

    \" U ber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik

    Heisenberg, W., 1927. \" U ber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Z. Phys. 42, 172 - 198

    1927

  59. [59]

    The physical principles of the quantum theory, Hoyt, F.C

    Heisenberg, W., 1930. The physical principles of the quantum theory, Hoyt, F.C. Dover

    1930

  60. [60]

    An invitation to quantum incompatibility

    Heinosaari, T., Miyadera, T., and Ziman, M., 2016. An invitation to quantum incompatibility. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 123001

    2016

  61. [61]

    W., and Kennedy, R

    Helstrom, C. W., and Kennedy, R. S. 1974. Noncommuting observables in quantum detection and estimation theory. IEEE Trans. Inf. Th. 20, 16 - 24

    1974

  62. [62]

    W., 1976

    Helstrom, C. W., 1976. Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, Academic Press, New York

    1976

  63. [63]

    I., 1957

    Hirschmann, I. I., 1957. A Note on Entropy. Am J. Math. 79, 152-156

    1957

  64. [64]

    S., 1982

    Holevo, A. S., 1982. Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam

    1982

  65. [65]

    Variance-based uncertainty relations

    Huang, Y., 2012. Variance-based uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. A 86, 024101

    2012

  66. [66]

    D., 1992

    Ivanovic, I. D., 1992. An inequality for the sum of entropies of unbiased quantum measurements. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25, L363-L364

    1992

  67. [67]

    Heisenberg uncertainty relation for three canonical observables

    Kechrimparis, S., and Weigert, S., 2014. Heisenberg uncertainty relation for three canonical observables. Phys. Rev. A 90, 062118

    2014

  68. [68]

    H., 1927

    Kennard, E. H., 1927. Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen. Z. Phys. 44, 326 - 352

    1927

  69. [69]

    R., and Skagerstam, B.-S., 1985

    Klauder, J. R., and Skagerstam, B.-S., 1985. Coherent States - Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics, World Scientific, Singapore

    1985

  70. [70]

    The Operational Meaning of Min- and Max-Entropy

    K\"onig, R., Renner, R., and Schaffner, C., 2009. The Operational Meaning of Min- and Max-Entropy. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55, 4337-4347

    2009

  71. [71]

    Complementary Observables and Uncertainty Relations

    Kraus, K., 1987. Complementary Observables and Uncertainty Relations. Phys. Rev. D 35, 3070-3075

    1987

  72. [72]

    R., 2002

    Krishna, M., and Parthasarathy, K. R., 2002. An Entropic Uncertainty Principle for Quantum Measurements. Indian Journal of Statistics 64, 842-851

    2002

  73. [73]

    J., Berta, and Pollack, H

    Landau, H. J., Berta, and Pollack, H. O., 1961. Prolate spheroidal wave functions, Fourier analysis and uncertainty - II. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 40, 65-84

    1961

  74. [74]

    Experimental investigation of the entanglement-assisted entropic uncertainty principle

    Li, C.-F.., Xu, J.-S., Xu, X.-Y., Li, K., and Guo, G.-C., 2011. Experimental investigation of the entanglement-assisted entropic uncertainty principle. Nature Phys. 7, 752–756

    2011

  75. [75]

    H., and Ruskai, M

    Lieb, E. H., and Ruskai, M. B., 1977. Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum mechanical entropy. J. Math. Phys. 14, 1938 - 1941

    1977

  76. [76]

    Lund, A. P. , and Wiseman, H. M., 2010. Measuring measurement-disturbance relationships with weak values. New J. Phys. 12, 093011

    2010

  77. [77]

    and Du, J., 2017

    Ma, W., Chen, B., Liu, Y., Wang, M., Ye, X., Kong, F., Shi, F., Fei, S.-M. and Du, J., 2017. Experimental Demonstration of Uncertainty Relations for the Triple Components of Angular Momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 180402

    2017

  78. [78]

    Maassen, H., and Uffink, J. B. M., 1988. Generalized Entropic Uncertainty Relations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1103-1106

    1988

  79. [79]

    K., 2014

    Maccone, L., and Pati, A. K., 2014. Stronger Uncertainty Relations for All Incompatible Observables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 260401

    2014

  80. [80]

    I., 2010

    Mandayam, P., Wehner, S., and Balachandran, N. I., 2010. A transform of complementary aspects with applications to entropic uncertainty relations. J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 51, 082201

    2010

Showing first 80 references.