arxiv: 2604.09385 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: unknown

NCCR PlanetS: Observational and computational characterization of exoplanet atmospheres

Daniel Kitzmann , Elspeth K. H. Lee , Jens Hoeijmakers , Kevin Heng

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP

keywords exoplanet atmospheresatmospheric dynamicsradiative transferatmospheric chemistrycloud formationgeneral circulation modelsatmospheric retrievalobservational data

0 comments

The pith

Collective progress in atmospheric modeling and observational techniques is improving characterization of planets beyond the Solar System.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper provides a review of observational and theoretical work on the atmospheres of exoplanets. It describes the key physical and chemical processes that shape these atmospheres, including dynamics, radiative transfer, chemistry, and cloud formation. Modeling approaches are presented, spanning from simple one-dimensional setups to sophisticated three-dimensional simulations of global circulation. Frameworks for retrieving atmospheric characteristics from data are outlined, using both classical statistical methods and newer machine learning techniques. Strategies for gathering observations with various telescopes are discussed, with attention to how theory and data inform each other to build knowledge about these distant worlds.

Core claim

By examining the governing processes in exoplanet atmospheres and the tools to model and observe them, the review shows that advances in simulation methods, data inference techniques, and observational capabilities are collectively enhancing our ability to understand planetary atmospheres outside the Solar System.

What carries the argument

The synthesis of physical and chemical process modeling with atmospheric retrieval from observational data.

If this is right

Models of varying complexity can capture essential atmospheric behaviors in exoplanets and brown dwarfs.
Retrieval methods allow deduction of atmospheric properties from spectral observations.
Observational data from space and ground instruments provide constraints that refine theoretical models.
The connection between these elements drives overall progress in the field.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future extensions could include more detailed treatments of additional atmospheric effects not emphasized here.
Applying these methods to new datasets might uncover unexpected atmospheric compositions or dynamics.
Computational advances could enable even more integrated simulations that include all processes simultaneously.

Load-bearing premise

The topics covered represent the main developments in the observational and computational characterization of exoplanet atmospheres.

What would settle it

Discovery of atmospheric phenomena in exoplanets that cannot be accounted for by the reviewed processes or models would indicate the review's overview is incomplete.

read the original abstract

This chapter reviews the current state of observational and theoretical efforts in the characterization of exoplanet atmospheres, with a focus on developments enabled through the Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research (NCCR) PlanetS. It covers the essential physical and chemical processes that govern atmospheric dynamics, radiative transfer, chemistry, and cloud formation in exoplanets and brown dwarfs. The review discusses the modeling approaches used to simulate these processes, ranging from simplified 1D models to fully coupled 3D general circulation models. Atmospheric retrieval frameworks are presented as tools for inferring atmospheric properties from observational data, highlighting both classical Bayesian techniques and emerging machine learning methods. Observational strategies using instruments like HST, JWST, and ground-based high-resolution spectrographs are also examined. Special emphasis is placed on the interplay between theory and observation, and how developments in modeling, data analysis, and instrumentation collectively advance our understanding of planetary atmospheres beyond the Solar System.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a review chapter summarizing NCCR PlanetS work on exoplanet atmospheres with no new results, but it organizes the material clearly.

read the letter

This paper is a review chapter that pulls together observational and computational efforts in exoplanet atmosphere characterization, centered on developments from the Swiss NCCR PlanetS. It walks through key physical and chemical processes, modeling from simple 1D setups to 3D circulation models, retrieval techniques including Bayesian and machine learning approaches, and observations with HST, JWST, and ground-based spectrographs. The core point is the back-and-forth between theory and data advancing the field beyond Solar System planets. No new derivations, data, or techniques appear here; it is explicitly a synthesis of prior work and NCCR contributions. What it does well is give a coherent structure to the topics and emphasize how modeling, analysis, and instrumentation reinforce each other. The abstract shows a logical flow without obvious gaps or contradictions in the high-level outline. Soft spots are minor and expected for the document type. Soundness depends on the quality of the cited literature, which the review does not re-derive. The scope is openly limited to NCCR-enabled work plus essentials rather than a full unbiased survey of the global field, so the representativeness issue is not a hidden flaw but a stated boundary. No circular claims or invented entities stand out. This is useful for researchers and students in exoplanet atmospheres who want a consolidated starting point, especially those tracking European or Swiss-led efforts. It could work as a reference or teaching aid. I would send it to peer review; reviews that organize the literature this way can save time for the community when the synthesis is balanced and well-referenced.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review chapter summarizing the current state of observational and theoretical efforts to characterize exoplanet atmospheres, with a focus on developments enabled by the Swiss NCCR PlanetS. It covers governing physical and chemical processes (dynamics, radiative transfer, chemistry, cloud formation), modeling approaches (from 1D to fully coupled 3D GCMs), atmospheric retrieval frameworks (Bayesian and emerging machine-learning methods), and observational strategies using HST, JWST, and ground-based high-resolution spectrographs. The central claim is that advances in modeling, data analysis, and instrumentation collectively improve understanding of atmospheres beyond the Solar System, with emphasis on the interplay between theory and observation.

Significance. If the review accurately reflects the cited literature and NCCR contributions, it offers a coherent, focused overview that bridges key areas of exoplanet atmosphere science. The inclusion of 3D modeling, machine-learning retrievals, and the explicit discussion of theory-observation synergy provides a useful reference point for the field, particularly for researchers seeking an integrated perspective on recent progress. The manuscript's strength lies in its descriptive synthesis rather than new derivations, making it potentially valuable for guiding future work if the selected NCCR examples are representative within the stated scope.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction and Conclusions] The abstract and introduction frame the scope as a focused NCCR-enabled overview rather than a comprehensive survey; this boundary condition is acknowledged but could be restated more explicitly in the concluding section to avoid any implication of broader representativeness.
[Atmospheric retrieval frameworks] In the section discussing retrieval frameworks, the advantages of machine-learning methods over classical Bayesian techniques are noted but would benefit from one or two concrete NCCR-specific examples (e.g., performance metrics or case studies) to illustrate the claimed emergence of these methods.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for the recommendation of minor revision. The provided summary accurately reflects the scope, structure, and emphasis of our review chapter on exoplanet atmosphere characterization, including the focus on NCCR PlanetS contributions and the interplay between theory and observations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: descriptive review with no derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

This document is a review chapter summarizing established physical processes, modeling techniques (1D to 3D GCMs), retrieval frameworks (Bayesian and ML), and observational strategies (HST, JWST, ground-based) in exoplanet atmospheres, with emphasis on NCCR PlanetS-enabled work. No original equations, predictions, or first-principles derivations are presented that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central statements are descriptive overviews of external literature and collective advances; the scope is explicitly limited to selected topics and NCCR developments rather than claiming universality. No self-citation chains, fitted parameters, or ansatzes are load-bearing for any result. The paper is self-contained as a synthesis and scores at the default non-circularity level.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As this is a review paper summarizing established knowledge in exoplanet science, it does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all content draws from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1172 out tokens · 68208 ms · 2026-05-10T17:24:32.955450+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages

[1]

Seager, D.D

S. Seager, D.D. Sasselov, ApJ537(2), 916 (2000). DOI 10.1086/309088

work page doi:10.1086/309088 2000
[2]

Charbonneau, T.M

D. Charbonneau, T.M. Brown, R.W. Noyes, R.L. Gilliland, ApJ568(1), 377 (2002). DOI 10.1086/338770

work page doi:10.1086/338770 2002
[3]

Deming, S

D. Deming, S. Seager, L.J. Richardson, J. Harrington, Nature434(7034), 740 (2005). DOI 10.1038/nature03507

work page doi:10.1038/nature03507 2005
[4]

Stevenson, J.M

K.B. Stevenson, J.M. D ´esert, M.R. Line, et al., Science346(6211), 838 (2014). DOI 10.1126/science.1256758

work page doi:10.1126/science.1256758 2014
[5]

Mikal-Evans, D.K

T. Mikal-Evans, D.K. Sing, J.K. Barstow, et al., Nature Astronomy6, 471 (2022). DOI 10.1038/s41550-021-01592-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01592-w 2022
[7]

2012, ApJ, 758, 36, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/36

N. Madhusudhan, ApJ758(1), 36 (2012). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/36

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/1/36 2012
[9]

Marley, T.D

M.S. Marley, T.D. Robinson, ARA&A53, 279 (2015). DOI 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214- 122522

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214- 2015
[11]

2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

M.S. Marley, A.S. Ackerman, J.N. Cuzzi, D. Kitzmann,Clouds and Hazes in Exoplanet Atmospheres(University of Arizona Press, 2013), p. 367. DOI 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816530595-ch15

work page doi:10.2458/azu 2013
[13]

Science , author =

P. Kalas, J.R. Graham, E. Chiang, et al., Science322(5906), 1345 (2008). DOI 10.1126/science.1166609

work page doi:10.1126/science.1166609 2008
[14]

Rebolo, M.R

R. Rebolo, M.R. Zapatero Osorio, E.L. Mart ´ın, Nature377(6545), 129 (1995). DOI 10.1038/377129a0

work page doi:10.1038/377129a0 1995
[15]

Oppenheimer, S.R

B.R. Oppenheimer, S.R. Kulkarni, K. Matthews, T. Nakajima, Science270(5241), 1478 (1995). DOI 10.1126/science.270.5241.1478

work page doi:10.1126/science.270.5241.1478 1995
[16]

Kanschat, E

G. Kanschat, E. Meink ¨ohn, R. Rannacher, R. Wehrse,Numerical Methods in Multidimen- sional Radiative Transfer(Berlin: Springer, 2009)

2009
[17]

Meador, W.R

W.E. Meador, W.R. Weaver, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences37, 630 (1980). DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037¡0630:TSATRT¿2.0.CO;2

work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037 1980
[18]

B., McKay , C

O.B. Toon, C.P. McKay, T.P. Ackerman, K. Santhanam, J. Geophys. Res.94, 16287 (1989). DOI 10.1029/JD094iD13p16287

work page doi:10.1029/jd094id13p16287 1989
[19]

Forget, R.T

F. Forget, R.T. Pierrehumbert, Science278, 1273 (1997). DOI 10.1126/science.278.5341.1273

work page doi:10.1126/science.278.5341.1273 1997
[20]

Kitzmann, ApJ817(2), L18 (2016)

D. Kitzmann, ApJ817(2), L18 (2016). DOI 10.3847/2041-8205/817/2/L18

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/817/2/l18 2016
[21]

Numerically stable algorithm for discrete- ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media.Applied Optics1988,27, 2502–2509

K. Stamnes, S.C. Tsay, K. Jayaweera, W. Wiscombe, Appl. Opt.27, 2502 (1988). DOI 10.1364/AO.27.002502

work page doi:10.1364/ao.27.002502 1988
[22]

K. Heng, D. Kitzmann, ApJS232(2), 20 (2017). DOI 10.3847/1538-4365/aa8907

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa8907 2017
[23]

K. Heng, M. Malik, D. Kitzmann, ApJS237(2), 29 (2018). DOI 10.3847/1538-4365/aad199

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aad199 2018
[24]

Lee, ApJ965(2), 115 (2024)

E.K.H. Lee, ApJ965(2), 115 (2024). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e8e Observational and computational characterization of exoplanet atmospheres 23

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e8e 2024
[25]

J. Li, Q. Fu, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences57(17), 2905 (2000). DOI 10.1175/1520- 0469(2000)057¡2905:AAWSEF¿2.0.CO;2

work page doi:10.1175/1520- 2000
[26]

Zhang, Y.N

F. Zhang, Y.N. Shi, J. Li, et al., Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences74(2), 419 (2017). DOI 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0172.1

work page doi:10.1175/jas-d-16-0172.1 2017
[27]

E. Lee, J. Taylor, S.L. Grimm, et al., MNRAS487(2), 2082 (2019). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stz1418

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1418 2082
[29]

Gordon and L.S

I.E. Gordon, L.S. Rothman, R.J. Hargreaves, et al., J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf.277, 107949 (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949

work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949 2022
[30]

, year = 2010, month = oct, volume =

L.S. Rothman, I.E. Gordon, R.J. Barber, et al., J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf.111, 2139 (2010). DOI 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.05.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.05.001 2010
[31]

Yurchenko and Ahmed F

J. Tennyson, S.N. Yurchenko, A.F. Al-Refaie, et al., Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy327, 73 (2016). DOI 10.1016/j.jms.2016.05.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.jms.2016.05.002 2016
[32]

Grimm, K

S.L. Grimm, K. Heng, ApJ808(2), 182 (2015). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/182

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/182 2015
[35]

Keles, M

E. Keles, M. Mallonn, D. Kitzmann, et al., MNRAS513(1), 1544 (2022). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stac810

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac810 2022
[37]

C., Buchhave, L

P.C. August, L.A. Buchhave, H. Diamond-Lowe, et al., A&A695, A171 (2025). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202452611

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452611 2025
[38]

2025, AJ, 170, 226, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adfc6a

L.P. Coulombe, B. Benneke, J. Krissansen-Totton, et al., AJ170(4), 226 (2025). DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/adfc6a

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adfc6a 2025
[39]

, keywords =

K. Heng, J.R. Lyons, S.M. Tsai, ApJ816(2), 96 (2016). DOI 10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/96

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/2/96 2016
[40]

Heng, S.M

K. Heng, S.M. Tsai, ApJ829(2), 104 (2016). DOI 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/104

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/104 2016
[41]

Gordon, B

S. Gordon, B. McBride. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. NASA RP-1311 (1994)

1994
[42]

Lodders, B

K. Lodders, B. Fegley, Earth and Planetary Science Letters117(1-2), 125 (1993). DOI 10.1016/0012-821X(93)90122-P

work page doi:10.1016/0012-821x(93)90122-p 1993
[44]

Stock, D

J.W. Stock, D. Kitzmann, A.B.C. Patzer, E. Sedlmayr, MNRAS479, 865 (2018). DOI 10.1093/mnras/sty1531

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1531 2018
[45]

W., Kitzmann, D., & Patzer, A

J.W. Stock, D. Kitzmann, A.B.C. Patzer, MNRAS517(3), 4070 (2022). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stac2623

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2623 2022
[46]

, keywords =

D. Kitzmann, J.W. Stock, A.B.C. Patzer, MNRAS527(3), 7263 (2024). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stad3515

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3515 2024
[48]

R. Hu, S. Seager, W. Bains, ApJ761(2), 166 (2012). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/166

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/166 2012
[50]

Allen, Y.L

M. Allen, Y.L. Yung, J.W. Waters, J. Geophys. Res.86, 3617 (1981). DOI 10.1029/JA086iA05p03617

work page doi:10.1029/ja086ia05p03617 1981
[51]

Rimmer, C

P.B. Rimmer, C. Helling, ApJS224(1), 9 (2016). DOI 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/9

work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/9 2016
[52]

F., et al

A. Segura, K. Krelove, J.F. Kasting, et al., Astrobiology3(4), 689 (2003). DOI 10.1089/153110703322736024

work page doi:10.1089/153110703322736024 2003
[54]

Linstrom, W

P. Linstrom, W. Mallard, (46) (2001) 24 Kitzmann, Lee, Hoeijmakers & Heng

2001
[61]

E.K.H. Lee, X. Tan, S.M. Tsai, MNRAS523(3), 4477 (2023). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stad1715

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1715 2023
[63]

R., Moran, S

P. Gao, H.R. Wakeford, S.E. Moran, V. Parmentier, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 126(4), e06655 (2021). DOI 10.1029/2020JE006655

work page doi:10.1029/2020je006655 2021
[64]

Lee, MNRAS524(2), 2918 (2023)

E.K.H. Lee, MNRAS524(2), 2918 (2023). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stad2037

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2037 2023
[65]

H.P. Gail, E. Sedlmayr, A&A206, 153 (1988)

1988
[66]

E.K.H. Lee, K. Ohno, A&A695, A111 (2025). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202452922

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452922 2025
[67]

Gao, M.S

P. Gao, M.S. Marley, A.S. Ackerman, ApJ855(2), 86 (2018). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a1

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a1 2018
[69]

Lee, A&A698, A220 (2025)

E.K.H. Lee, A&A698, A220 (2025). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202554511

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554511 2025
[70]

Helling, P

C. Helling, P. Woitke, W.F. Thi, A&A485(2), 547 (2008). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361:20078220

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078220 2008
[71]

Hauschildt, E

P.H. Hauschildt, E. Baron, F. Allard, ApJ483(1), 390 (1997). DOI 10.1086/304233

work page doi:10.1086/304233 1997
[72]

Ackerman, M.S

A.S. Ackerman, M.S. Marley, ApJ556(2), 872 (2001). DOI 10.1086/321540

work page doi:10.1086/321540 2001
[73]

Kasting, Icarus74(3), 472 (1988)

J.F. Kasting, Icarus74(3), 472 (1988). DOI 10.1016/0019-1035(88)90116-9

work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(88)90116-9 1988
[74]

F., Whitmire, D

J.F. Kasting, D.P. Whitmire, R.T. Reynolds, Icarus101(1), 108 (1993). DOI 10.1006/icar.1993.1010

work page doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1010 1993
[76]

Goyal, N

J.M. Goyal, N. Mayne, D.K. Sing, et al., MNRAS474(4), 5158 (2018). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stx3015

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3015 2018
[82]

I. Wong, A. Shporer, G. Zhou, et al., AJ162(6), 256 (2021). DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/ac26bd

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac26bd 2021
[83]

Oreshenko, D

M. Oreshenko, D. Kitzmann, P. M ´arquez-Neila, et al., AJ159(1), 6 (2020). DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/ab5955

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab5955 2020
[88]

Showman, C.S

A.P. Showman, C.S. Cooper, J.J. Fortney, M.S. Marley, ApJ682(1), 559 (2008). DOI 10.1086/589325

work page doi:10.1086/589325 2008
[90]

Mendonc ¸a, S.L

J.M. Mendonc ¸a, S.L. Grimm, L. Grosheintz, K. Heng, ApJ829(2), 115 (2016). DOI 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/115

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/115 2016
[91]

Deitrick, K

R. Deitrick, K. Heng, U. Schroffenegger, et al., MNRAS512(3), 3759 (2022). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stac680

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac680 2022
[92]

Hammond, R.T

M. Hammond, R.T. Pierrehumbert, ApJ849(2), 152 (2017). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9328

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9328 2017
[93]

E.K.H. Lee, V. Parmentier, M. Hammond, et al., MNRAS506(2), 2695 (2021). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stab1851

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1851 2021
[95]

E.K.H. Lee, X. Tan, S.M. Tsai, MNRAS529(3), 2686 (2024). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stae537

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae537 2024
[96]

Challener, Z

R.C. Challener, Z. Rustamkulov, E.K.H. Lee, et al., ApJ969(2), L32 (2024). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5958

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5958 2024
[97]

, year = 2008, month = apr, volume =

P.G.J. Irwin, N.A. Teanby, R. de Kok, et al., J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf.109, 1136 (2008). DOI 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.11.006

work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.11.006 2008
[99]

Line, Y.L

M.R. Line, Y.L. Yung, ApJ779(1), 3 (2013). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/3

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/779/1/3 2013
[103]

M ´arquez-Neila, C

P. M ´arquez-Neila, C. Fisher, R. Sznitman, K. Heng, Nature Astronomy2, 719 (2018). DOI 10.1038/s41550-018-0504-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0504-2 2018
[104]

2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 913, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abee94

L. Welbanks, N. Madhusudhan, ApJ913(2), 114 (2021). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/abee94

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abee94 2021
[105]

MacDonald, The Journal of Open Source Software8, 4873 (2023)

R.J. MacDonald, The Journal of Open Source Software8, 4873 (2023). DOI 10.21105/joss.04873

work page doi:10.21105/joss.04873 2023
[108]

Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

D.J.M. Petit dit de la Roche, H. Chakraborty, M. Lendl, et al., A&A692, A83 (2024). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202451740

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451740 2024
[111]

2009, ApJ, 707, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/24

N. Madhusudhan, S. Seager, ApJ707(1), 24 (2009). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/24

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/707/1/24 2009
[112]

Nested Sampling,

J. Skilling, inAmerican Institute of Physics Conference Series,American Institute of Physics Conference Series, vol. 735, ed. by R. Fischer, R. Preuss, U.V. Toussaint (2004),American Institute of Physics Conference Series, vol. 735, pp. 395–405. DOI 10.1063/1.1835238

work page doi:10.1063/1.1835238 2004
[113]

2008 , month = jan, journal =

F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson, MNRAS384, 449 (2008). DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12353.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12353.x 2008
[114]

B., S´ anchez-Janssen, R., Labb´ e, I., et al

B.J. Brewer, L.B. P ´artay, G. Cs ´anyi, arXiv e-prints arXiv:0912.2380 (2009). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.0912.2380

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.0912.2380 2009
[115]

Statistics and Computing , keywords =

E. Higson, W. Handley, M. Hobson, A. Lasenby, Statistics and Computing29(5), 891 (2019). DOI 10.1007/s11222-018-9844-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11222-018-9844-0 2019
[116]

Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology

R. Trotta, Contemporary Physics49(2), 71 (2008). DOI 10.1080/00107510802066753

work page doi:10.1080/00107510802066753 2008
[117]

Waldmann, ApJ820(2), 107 (2016)

I.P. Waldmann, ApJ820(2), 107 (2016). DOI 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/107

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/107 2016
[118]

Zingales, I.P

T. Zingales, I.P. Waldmann, AJ156(6), 268 (2018). DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/aae77c 26 Kitzmann, Lee, Hoeijmakers & Heng

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aae77c 2018
[119]

Himes, J

M.D. Himes, J. Harrington, A.D. Cobb, et al., PSJ3(4), 91 (2022). DOI 10.3847/PSJ/abe3fd

work page doi:10.3847/psj/abe3fd 2022
[121]

2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 117, 30055, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912789117

K. Cranmer, J. Brehmer, G. Louppe, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 117(48), 30055 (2020). DOI 10.1073/pnas.1912789117

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1912789117 2020

Showing first 80 references.