arxiv: 2604.09727 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🧮 math.GM

Recognition: no theorem link

Continued fractions, determinant expressions, and identities

Nikita Kalinin, Takao Komatsu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.GM

keywords continued fractionsdeterminantsidentitiesq-analoguesincomplete numbersspecial numbersunified framework

0 comments

The pith

Treating finite continued fractions as incomplete numbers unifies their links to determinants and coefficient identities for q-analogues.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework that relates continued fractions to determinants and identities by examining finite continued fractions as incomplete numbers, also called restricted or associated numbers. This approach makes it possible to derive these objects in a consistent manner rather than handling each case separately. The classical cases illustrate the method, while the main contributions come from applying it to q-analogues of special numbers. A sympathetic reader would care because the authors indicate that the same technique should apply broadly to other families of special numbers, reducing the need for ad-hoc derivations in future work.

Core claim

By viewing finite continued fractions from the perspective of incomplete numbers, their relationships with determinant representations and identities become clear, enabling the uniform derivation of continued fractions, determinant formulas, and coefficient identities for several new q-families of special numbers.

What carries the argument

The incomplete numbers perspective (restricted or associated numbers) applied to finite continued fractions, which connects them directly to determinant expressions and various identities.

If this is right

Continued fraction expansions for q-analogues can be obtained systematically.
Determinant representations follow from the same viewpoint.
Coefficient identities are derived in a consistent way across families.
The method applies to multiple new q-families.
It is expected to work for other families of special numbers as well.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This suggests that similar unified treatments can be developed for non-q special numbers using the same incomplete numbers perspective.
The clarification of relationships may lead to new discoveries in related mathematical structures involving q-series.
Researchers can test this on q-analogues not covered in the paper to see if new results emerge without case-specific changes.

Load-bearing premise

The key premise is that relationships based on incomplete numbers extend in a systematic way to q-families and other settings without needing ad-hoc adjustments for each case.

What would settle it

Finding a family of special numbers, particularly a q-analogue, for which the incomplete numbers approach does not yield the expected continued fraction, determinant formula, or identity without extra modifications would falsify the generality of the framework.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we clarified the relationship between continued fractions, determinants, and identities, making it easier to apply these methods systematically in other settings. In particular, we studied finite continued fractions from the perspective of incomplete numbers (restricted or associated numbers) and also explored their relationships with determinant representations and identities. Most of the new results in this paper concern $q$-analogues of special numbers, whereas the classical cases mainly serve to illustrate and unify the general framework. The framework developed here is flexible and allows one to derive continued fractions, determinant formulas, and coefficient identities in a uniform way for several new $q$-families, and it is expected to be applicable to other families of special numbers, as well.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper unifies continued fractions and determinants for q-analogues via incomplete numbers, delivering new explicit results but with generality shown mostly by examples.

read the letter

The key takeaway is that this paper develops a method using incomplete numbers to derive continued fractions, determinant expressions, and identities in a consistent manner, with most of the original content being new q-analogues of special numbers. What stands out is the application to q-families. They use the incomplete number perspective to get explicit continued fraction expansions and determinant formulas for these q-versions, which weren't available before. The classical cases help show how the pieces fit together without claiming too much novelty there. This kind of template can be handy for anyone working on q-series who needs to find representations quickly. On the downside, the flexibility for other families is asserted but not fully demonstrated with a general result. The paper illustrates the process on specific q-analogues, yet it doesn't provide a theorem that guarantees the same forms for any family without additional adjustments based on their recurrences. That makes the uniform way claim a bit optimistic until more cases are checked or a broader proof is added. The derivations appear straightforward from the description, and there's no sign of circular reasoning. The math seems honest and focused on producing usable formulas. This work is for people in the special functions community, particularly those dealing with q-analogues. If you're looking for new identities or ways to organize continued fractions in that area, the explicit results here could be useful to build on. I would recommend sending it for peer review. The concrete new q-results give it enough substance to merit referee feedback, even if the general framework part might need more support.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a framework viewing finite continued fractions through the lens of incomplete (restricted or associated) numbers, clarifying their connections to determinant representations and coefficient identities. Classical cases are used to illustrate the approach, while the bulk of the new results concern q-analogues of special numbers. The authors claim that this perspective yields continued-fraction, determinant, and identity relations in a uniform manner for several new q-families and is expected to extend to other families of special numbers.

Significance. If the uniformity claim holds, the work would supply a systematic method for obtaining these representations across q-families, potentially simplifying derivations in q-series and special functions. Credit is due for unifying classical cases under one perspective and for producing concrete new q-analogues. The significance is reduced, however, because the flexibility is demonstrated only on chosen examples rather than established by a general theorem.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and q-families sections] The central claim that the incomplete-number perspective yields continued-fraction, determinant, and identity relations in a uniform manner for arbitrary q-families is not supported by a general theorem. The manuscript illustrates the approach on specific q-analogues yet supplies no derivation that obtains the representations directly from the incomplete-number definition without invoking family-specific recurrences or normalizations (see abstract and the sections presenting the new q-families).
[Framework and results sections] Consequently, the asserted flexibility reduces to patterns observed in the treated examples; any new family may still require ad-hoc adjustments to match the determinant or continued-fraction form, which is load-bearing for the paper's main contribution.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract could more sharply distinguish the scope of the new q-results from the illustrative role of the classical cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have revised the abstract and framework sections to more precisely delineate the scope of our claims, clarifying that the incomplete-number perspective provides a uniform lens for deriving the stated relations in the specific q-families treated, while noting its expected applicability to others without asserting a general theorem for arbitrary families. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and q-families sections] The central claim that the incomplete-number perspective yields continued-fraction, determinant, and identity relations in a uniform manner for arbitrary q-families is not supported by a general theorem. The manuscript illustrates the approach on specific q-analogues yet supplies no derivation that obtains the representations directly from the incomplete-number definition without invoking family-specific recurrences or normalizations (see abstract and the sections presenting the new q-families).

Authors: We note that the manuscript does not claim results for arbitrary q-families; the abstract states that the framework 'allows one to derive continued fractions, determinant formulas, and coefficient identities in a uniform way for several new q-families, and it is expected to be applicable to other families of special numbers.' The classical cases illustrate the perspective, and the new results apply it to the q-analogues considered. We agree, however, that the presentation would benefit from greater precision to avoid any implication of universality. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract and the q-families sections to emphasize that each derivation begins from the incomplete-number definition and proceeds via the family's natural recurrences, with the overall structure (CF as ratio of incompletes, leading to determinant and identity) remaining uniform. A new remark outlines the general steps without introducing a theorem for all possible families. revision: yes
Referee: [Framework and results sections] Consequently, the asserted flexibility reduces to patterns observed in the treated examples; any new family may still require ad-hoc adjustments to match the determinant or continued-fraction form, which is load-bearing for the paper's main contribution.

Authors: We respectfully maintain that the flexibility arises from the consistent viewpoint of finite continued fractions as ratios involving incomplete (restricted or associated) numbers, which directly yields the determinant representations through standard determinant identities for continued fractions and the coefficient identities via expansion or recurrence matching. For each q-family the derivations follow the same sequence: introduce the incomplete q-analogue, express the finite CF in that language, and extract the determinant and identity forms. The recurrences and normalizations are necessarily family-specific because they encode the defining properties of the underlying special numbers; they are not introduced ad hoc to force a determinant or CF shape. To address the concern we have added to the framework section an explicit outline of the general procedure, showing how it is instantiated in the examples and indicating the natural points of adaptation for other families. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework developed independently and illustrated on examples

full rationale

The manuscript presents a perspective based on incomplete numbers to relate continued fractions, determinants, and identities. It develops this as a general method and applies it to specific q-families, with classical cases used only for illustration. No equations or claims reduce a derived quantity to a fitted parameter or self-definition by construction. No load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described structure. The asserted flexibility is a methodological claim rather than a tautological renaming or prediction forced by inputs. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The framework appears to rest on standard properties of continued fractions and q-series without new postulates visible here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5406 in / 1078 out tokens · 22316 ms · 2026-05-10T17:50:11.416347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

[1]

Arakawa, T

T. Arakawa, T. Ibukiyama and M. Kaneko,Bernoulli numbers and zeta functions, Springer Monogr. Math., Springer, Tokyo, 2014

2014
[2]

Belbachir, A

H. Belbachir, A. Belkhir and I.-E. Djellas,Permanent of Toeplitz– Hessenberg matrices with generalized Fibonacci and Lucas entries, Appl. Appl. Math.17(2022), no. 2, Article 15, 558–570

2022
[3]

Barman and T

R. Barman and T. Komatsu,Lehmer’s generalized Euler numbers in hypergeometric functions, J. Korean Math. Soc.56(2019), No. 2, 485– 505

2019
[4]

Brioschi,Sulle funzioni Bernoulliane ed Euleriane, Annali de Mat 1(1858): 260–263 (in Italian)

F. Brioschi,Sulle funzioni Bernoulliane ed Euleriane, Annali de Mat 1(1858): 260–263 (in Italian)
[5]

Bundschuh, ¨Uber eine Klasse reeller transzendenter Zahlen mit ex- plizit angebbarerg-adischer und Kettenbruch-Entwicklung, J

P. Bundschuh, ¨Uber eine Klasse reeller transzendenter Zahlen mit ex- plizit angebbarerg-adischer und Kettenbruch-Entwicklung, J. Reine Angew. Math.318(1980), 110–119

1980
[6]

P. J. Cameron,Some sequences of integers, Discret. Math.75(1989), 89–102

1989
[7]

Carlitz,q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, Duke Math

L. Carlitz,q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, Duke Math. J.15 (1948), 987–1000

1948
[8]

J. H. Conway and R. K. Guy,The Book of Numbers, Springer, New York, 1996

1996
[9]

J. L. Davison,A series and its associated continued fraction, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.63(1977), No. 1, 29–32

1977
[10]

P. K. Dey and T. Komatsu,Some identities of Cauchy numbers asso- ciated with continued fractions, Results Math.74(2019), Article 83, 11 pp. 26

2019
[11]

Ernst,q-Stirling numbers, an umbral approach, Adv

T. Ernst,q-Stirling numbers, an umbral approach, Adv. Dyn. Syst. Appl.3(2008), no. 2, 251–282

2008
[12]

Frame, The Hankel power sum matrix inverse and the Bernoulli continued fraction, Math

J. Frame, The Hankel power sum matrix inverse and the Bernoulli continued fraction, Math. Comp. 33 (1979), 815–826

1979
[13]

J. W. L. Glaisher,Expressions for Laplace’s coefficients, Bernoullian and Eulerian numbers etc. as determinants, Messenger,6(1875), 49– 63
[14]

G¨ okcan and A

˙I. G¨ okcan and A. H. De˘ ger,Investigation of determinants of Fibonacci–Hessenberg–Lorentz matrices and special number sequences, Turkish J. Math. Comput. Sci.17(2025), no. 2, 573–585. doi:10.47000/tjmcs.1581601

work page doi:10.47000/tjmcs.1581601 2025
[15]

Goy and M

T. Goy and M. Shattuck,Toeplitz–Hessenberg determinant formulas for the sequenceF n −1, Online J. Anal. Comb.19(2024), 1–26. doi:10.61091/ojac19-01

work page doi:10.61091/ojac19-01 2024
[16]

Goy and M

T. Goy and M. Shattuck,Determinants of Toeplitz–Hessenberg ma- trices with generalized Leonardo number entries, Ann. Math. Siles.38 (2024), no. 2, 284–313. doi:10.2478/amsil-2023-0027

work page doi:10.2478/amsil-2023-0027 2024
[17]

W. B. Jones, W. J. Thron,Continued fractions, Continued Fractions Analytic Theory and Applications, in: Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 11, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1980

1980
[18]

Kaneko,A recurrence formula for the Bernoulli numbers, Proc

M. Kaneko,A recurrence formula for the Bernoulli numbers, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci.71(1995), No. 8, 192–193

1995
[19]

Kılı¸ c,The generalized Fibonomial matrix, Eur

E. Kılı¸ c,The generalized Fibonomial matrix, Eur. J. Comb.31(2010), no. 1, 193–209

2010
[20]

Kılı¸ c and D

E. Kılı¸ c and D. Ta¸ scı,On the generalized Fibonacci and Pell sequences by Hessenberg matrices, Ars Comb.94(2010), 161–174

2010
[21]

Kılı¸ c, D

E. Kılı¸ c, D. Ta¸ scı and P. Haukkanen,On the generalized Lucas se- quences by Hessenberg matrices, Ars Comb.95(2010), 383–395

2010
[22]

Kim and J

M.-S. Kim and J. H. Lee,On sums of products of the extendedq- Euler numbers, J. Math. Anal. Appl.397(2013), No. 2, 522–528; corrigendum ibid.415(2014), No. 1, 497–498. 27

2013
[23]

N. R. Kanasri, T. Komatsu and V. Laohakosol,Cameron’s operator in terms of determinants and hypergeometric numbers, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex.28(2022), Paper No. 9, 23 pp

2022
[24]

Komatsu,Incomplete poly-Cauchy numbers, Monatsh

T. Komatsu,Incomplete poly-Cauchy numbers, Monatsh. Math.180 (2016), 271–288

2016
[25]

Komatsu,Complementary Euler numbers, Period

T. Komatsu,Complementary Euler numbers, Period. Math. Hung.75 (2017), 302–314

2017
[26]

Komatsu,Incomplete multi-poly-Bernoulli numbers and multiple zeta values, Bull

T. Komatsu,Incomplete multi-poly-Bernoulli numbers and multiple zeta values, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc.41(2018), 2029–2040

2018
[27]

Komatsu,Continued fraction expansions of the generating functions of Bernoulli and related numbers, Indag

T. Komatsu,Continued fraction expansions of the generating functions of Bernoulli and related numbers, Indag. Math., New Ser.31(2020), No. 4, 695–713

2020
[28]

Komatsu,Fibonacci determinants with Cameron’s operator, Bol

T. Komatsu,Fibonacci determinants with Cameron’s operator, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex.26(2020), 841–863

2020
[29]

Komatsu,Several continued fraction expansions of generalized Cauchy numbers, Bull

T. Komatsu,Several continued fraction expansions of generalized Cauchy numbers, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. (2)44(2021), No. 4, 2425–2446

2021
[30]

Komatsu,Bernoulli numbers with level2, Aequat

T. Komatsu,Bernoulli numbers with level2, Aequat. Math.99(2025), 71–87

2025
[31]

Komatsu,Fibonacci determinants

T. Komatsu,Fibonacci determinants. II, Lith. Math. J.65(2025), No. 4, 564–584

2025
[32]

Komatsu and E

T. Komatsu and E. Kılı¸ c,Fibonacci determinants. III, RAIRO, Theor. Inform. Appl.60(2026), Paper No. 8

2026
[33]

Komatsu, K

T. Komatsu, K. Liptai and I. Mezo,Incomplete poly-Bernoulli numbers associated with incomplete Stirling numbers, Publ. Math. Debrecen,88 (2016), 357–368

2016
[34]

Komatsu and G.-D

T. Komatsu and G.-D. Liu,Congruence properties of Lehmer-Euler numbers, Aequat. Math.99(2025), 1337–1355

2025
[35]

Komatsu, I

T. Komatsu, I. Mezo and L. Szalay,Incomplete Cauchy numbers, Acta Math. Hungar.149(2016), 306–323. 28

2016
[36]

Komatsu and A

T. Komatsu and A. Pizarro-Madariaga,Harmonic numbers associated with inversion numbers in terms of determinants, Turkish J. Math.43 (2019), 340–354

2019
[37]

Komatsu and J

T. Komatsu and J. L. Ramirez,Some determinants involving incom- plete Fubini numbers, An. S ¸tiint ¸. Univ. “Ovidius” Constant ¸a Ser. Mat. 26(2018), No.3, 143–170

2018
[38]

Komatsu and B

T. Komatsu and B. Sury,Polynomial identities for binomial sums of harmonic numbers of higher order, Mathematics13(2025), Article 321, 12 pp. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13020321

work page doi:10.3390/math13020321 2025
[39]

Komatsu and F

T. Komatsu and F. Yilmaz,Euler determinants, submitted manuscript
[40]

Komatsu and H

T. Komatsu and H. Zhu,Hypergeometric Euler numbers, AIMS Math. 5(2020), 1284–1303

2020
[41]

D. H. Lehmer,Lacunary recurrence formulas for the numbers of Bernoulli and Euler, Ann. of Math. (2)36(1935), No. 3, 637–649

1935
[42]

Loya,Amazing and Aesthetic Aspects of Analysis, in: Undergradu- ate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, 2017, ISBN-13: 978-1493967933

P. Loya,Amazing and Aesthetic Aspects of Analysis, in: Undergradu- ate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, 2017, ISBN-13: 978-1493967933

2017
[43]

Muir,The Theory of Determinants in the Historical Order of De- velopment, Four volumes, Dover Publications, New York, 1960

T. Muir,The Theory of Determinants in the Historical Order of De- velopment, Four volumes, Dover Publications, New York, 1960

1960
[44]

Perron,Die Lehre Von Den Kettenbruchen, second ed., Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, N

O. Perron,Die Lehre Von Den Kettenbruchen, second ed., Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, N. Y, 1950

1950
[45]

Trudi,Intorno ad alcune formole di sviluppo, Rendic

N. Trudi,Intorno ad alcune formole di sviluppo, Rendic. dell’ Accad. Napoli (1862), 135–143 (in Italian)
[46]

H. S. Wall,Analytic Theory of Continued Fractions, Chelsea, New- York, 1967

1967
[47]

Accessed 2025

Wolfram Research:http://functions.wolfram.com/ ElementaryFunctions/Log/10/. Accessed 2025. 29

2025