pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09739 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Extended Gravity Theories from a Thermodynamic Perspective

H. R. Fazlollahi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords extended gravitythermodynamic derivationentropy functionalcosmological implicationsnonsingular universeloop quantum cosmologymodified gravityhorizon degrees of freedom
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new entropy functional with quantum horizon properties extends thermodynamic gravity to produce nonsingular cosmologies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends Jacobson's thermodynamic derivation of gravity by generalizing the Clausius relation with a nontrivial entropy functional. Conventional entropy corrections modify the effective gravitational coupling but still leave singularities intact. The proposed entropy, which incorporates quantum properties at the horizon degrees of freedom, changes this outcome. It generates a family of extended gravity theories whose early-universe evolution features a nonsingular phase with finite Hubble parameter and de Sitter-like inflation, while late-time dynamics reproduce the effective equations of loop quantum cosmology. A reader would care because the construction links a single choice of entropy directly to both singularity avoidance and a known quantum-gravity phenomenology without extra fields.

Core claim

By generalizing the Clausius relation through a nontrivial entropy functional that incorporates quantum properties at the level of horizon degrees of freedom, the thermodynamic derivation of gravity yields modifications that appear as changes in the effective gravitational coupling. This framework leads to a nonsingular cosmological phase at early times with a finite Hubble parameter and de Sitter-like inflationary expansion characterized by finite entropy and temperature, while reproducing the effective dynamics of loop quantum cosmology at late times.

What carries the argument

The new entropy functional that incorporates quantum properties at the level of horizon degrees of freedom, substituted into the generalized Clausius relation to modify the effective gravitational coupling.

If this is right

  • Early-universe evolution becomes nonsingular with a finite Hubble parameter and de Sitter-like inflation.
  • Entropy and temperature remain finite throughout the inflationary phase.
  • Late-time cosmology reproduces the effective dynamics of loop quantum cosmology at leading order.
  • Entropy deformations manifest as modifications of the effective gravitational coupling.
  • Conventional entropy corrections remain insufficient to resolve singularities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction may provide a thermodynamic route to other quantum-gravity models that also resolve singularities.
  • Cosmological observables such as the spectrum of primordial perturbations could be used to constrain the specific form of the entropy functional.
  • The same entropy choice might alter black-hole thermodynamics or other horizon phenomena in a testable way.
  • Explicit field equations for the resulting modified gravity could be derived and compared with existing extended-gravity models.

Load-bearing premise

That a new entropy functional incorporating quantum properties at the horizon degrees of freedom can be consistently substituted into the generalized Clausius relation without introducing inconsistencies or requiring additional adjustments.

What would settle it

An observation of a singular big-bang phase with diverging Hubble parameter at early times, or a clear mismatch between the model's late-time expansion history and the leading-order dynamics of loop quantum cosmology.

read the original abstract

We extend the thermodynamic derivation of gravity in the Jacobson framework by generalizing the Clausius relation through a nontrivial entropy functional. We show that entropy deformations appear as modifications of the effective gravitational coupling, defining a broad class of modified gravity theories. However, conventional entropy corrections are insufficient to resolve spacetime singularities within this approach. We then propose a new entropy form by incorporating quantum properties at the level of horizon degrees of freedom. Implementing this entropy in the modified gravitational framework, we study its cosmological implications at both early and late times. In the early Universe, the model predicts a nonsingular phase with a finite Hubble parameter, leading to a de Sitter-like inflationary expansion with finite entropy and temperature. At late times, the theory reproduces, at leading order, the effective dynamics of loop quantum cosmology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends Jacobson's thermodynamic derivation of Einstein gravity by generalizing the Clausius relation δQ = T δS with a nontrivial entropy functional that incorporates quantum properties at the level of horizon degrees of freedom. This substitution modifies the effective gravitational coupling and defines a broad class of extended gravity theories. The authors argue that conventional entropy corrections (logarithmic or power-law) are insufficient to resolve singularities, propose a new entropy form, and derive its cosmological consequences: a nonsingular early-universe phase with finite Hubble parameter that evolves into de Sitter-like inflation with finite entropy and temperature, plus late-time dynamics that reproduce the effective equations of loop quantum cosmology at leading order.

Significance. If the substitution is internally consistent, the work supplies a parameter-free thermodynamic route to singularity resolution and LQC-like cosmology within a modified-gravity framework. It builds directly on the established Jacobson construction, yields explicit early- and late-time predictions, and offers falsifiable cosmological behavior without additional free parameters. These features would constitute a genuine contribution to the thermodynamic approach to quantum gravity phenomenology.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3 (Generalized Clausius relation and modified dynamics)] The central step—substituting the proposed quantum-corrected entropy into the generalized Clausius relation to obtain modified field equations—must be shown to preserve the local Rindler-horizon structure of the original Jacobson argument without hidden extra terms when the metric is specialized to FLRW. The manuscript should supply the explicit derivation (likely §3) and verify that the resulting effective equations remain consistent for the cosmological background.
  2. [§2.3 and §4 (Conventional corrections and new entropy proposal)] The assertion that conventional entropy corrections fail to produce a finite early-time Hubble parameter while the new functional succeeds requires a side-by-side calculation. Without this comparison (probably in §2.3 or §4), it is unclear whether the resolution is due to the specific functional form or to an implicit adjustment in the thermodynamic setup.
  3. [§5 (Cosmological implications at late times)] The claim that late-time dynamics reproduce LQC at leading order (likely §5) needs an explicit expansion or term-by-term matching to the LQC effective Friedmann equation. It must be demonstrated that this agreement is not an artifact of the particular entropy choice but follows from the thermodynamic construction.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract summarizes results without any equations or explicit form of the new entropy functional; adding a compact expression for S would improve accessibility.
  2. [Throughout the manuscript] Notation for the entropy functional and the modified gravitational coupling should be introduced with a clear definition on first appearance to prevent confusion with the standard Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which will help improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested additions and verifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 (Generalized Clausius relation and modified dynamics)] The central step—substituting the proposed quantum-corrected entropy into the generalized Clausius relation to obtain modified field equations—must be shown to preserve the local Rindler-horizon structure of the original Jacobson argument without hidden extra terms when the metric is specialized to FLRW. The manuscript should supply the explicit derivation (likely §3) and verify that the resulting effective equations remain consistent for the cosmological background.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is required to confirm internal consistency. In the revised manuscript we will expand §3 with the complete step-by-step substitution of the entropy functional into the generalized Clausius relation, explicitly demonstrating preservation of the local Rindler-horizon structure and the absence of extraneous terms upon specialization to the FLRW metric. We will also verify that the resulting effective equations remain consistent on the cosmological background. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2.3 and §4 (Conventional corrections and new entropy proposal)] The assertion that conventional entropy corrections fail to produce a finite early-time Hubble parameter while the new functional succeeds requires a side-by-side calculation. Without this comparison (probably in §2.3 or §4), it is unclear whether the resolution is due to the specific functional form or to an implicit adjustment in the thermodynamic setup.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a direct comparison is necessary to isolate the role of the entropy functional. In the revision we will add, in §2.3 and §4, an explicit side-by-side calculation of the early-time Hubble parameter for standard logarithmic and power-law corrections versus our proposed form. This will show that the finite Hubble parameter arises from the specific functional choice rather than any adjustment to the thermodynamic framework. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5 (Cosmological implications at late times)] The claim that late-time dynamics reproduce LQC at leading order (likely §5) needs an explicit expansion or term-by-term matching to the LQC effective Friedmann equation. It must be demonstrated that this agreement is not an artifact of the particular entropy choice but follows from the thermodynamic construction.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit term-by-term comparison is needed to establish the origin of the agreement. In the revised §5 we will expand our effective Friedmann equation and provide a direct term-by-term matching to the LQC effective equation, confirming the leading-order equivalence and showing that the agreement follows from the thermodynamic construction rather than being an artifact of the particular entropy functional. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in thermodynamic extension of Jacobson framework

full rationale

The paper begins from the established Jacobson thermodynamic derivation of Einstein gravity and explicitly proposes a new entropy functional motivated by quantum properties at horizon degrees of freedom. This proposal is introduced after showing that conventional corrections fail to resolve singularities, and the modified gravitational dynamics (effective coupling changes) and cosmological solutions follow directly from substitution into the generalized Clausius relation and solving the resulting field equations for FLRW spacetimes. The early-universe nonsingular de Sitter phase and late-time leading-order match to loop quantum cosmology are calculated consequences of the chosen entropy form rather than inputs redefined as outputs. No steps reduce predictions to inputs by construction, no load-bearing self-citations justify the entropy choice or uniqueness, and the derivation remains self-contained as an explicit model construction without tautological equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The paper rests on the Jacobson thermodynamic derivation of gravity and the validity of a generalized Clausius relation with a nontrivial entropy functional; a new entropy form is introduced without independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Jacobson thermodynamic derivation of gravity from the Clausius relation holds for the standard entropy
    The paper explicitly extends this established framework.
  • ad hoc to paper A generalized nontrivial entropy functional can be substituted into the Clausius relation to modify the effective gravitational coupling
    Central modeling choice that defines the class of modified gravity theories.
invented entities (1)
  • New entropy functional incorporating quantum properties at horizon degrees of freedom no independent evidence
    purpose: To produce nonsingular cosmology and late-time loop-quantum-cosmology dynamics while modifying the gravitational coupling
    Introduced in the paper as the key extension beyond conventional entropy corrections.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5421 in / 1608 out tokens · 44478 ms · 2026-05-10T16:47:47.294439+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Einstein, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1915, 844-847 (1915)

    1915

  2. [2]

    Einstein, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1915, 831-839 (1915)

    1915

  3. [3]

    F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington and C. David- son, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A220, 291-333 (1920) doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009 1920

  4. [4]

    , volume =

    A. Toomre, Astrophys. J.139, 1217-1238 (1964) doi:10.1086/147861

    work page doi:10.1086/147861 1964

  5. [5]

    Andersson and G

    E. Berti, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, U. Sperhake, L. C. Stein, N. Wex, K. Yagi and T. Baker,et al.Class. Quant. Grav.32, 243001 (2015) doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/32/24/243001 [arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/0264- 2015

  6. [6]

    Freese, EAS Publ

    K. Freese, EAS Publ. Ser.36, 113-126 (2009) doi:10.1051/eas/0936016 [arXiv:0812.4005 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1051/eas/0936016 2009

  7. [7]

    Garrett and G

    K. Garrett and G. Duda, Adv. Astron. 2011, 968283 (2011) doi:10.1155/2011/968283 [arXiv:1006.2483 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1155/2011/968283 2011

  8. [8]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 559-606 (2003) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559 [arXiv:astro- ph/0207347 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.559 2003

  9. [9]

    E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 091301 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 2003

  10. [10]

    Kiefer, Int

    C. Kiefer, Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys.124, 1-308 (2004) Clarendon, 2004, ISBN 978-0-19-958520- 5

    2004

  11. [11]

    Rovelli, Univ

    C. Rovelli, Univ. Pr., 2004, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755804

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755804 2004

  12. [12]

    D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, Nucl. Phys. B303, 407-454 (1988) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90390- 2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90390- 1988

  13. [13]

    String theory dynamics in various dimensions,

    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B443, 85-126 (1995) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00158-O [arXiv:hep- th/9503124 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00158-o 1995

  14. [14]

    D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2656 (1985) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2656

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2656 1985

  15. [15]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel.13, 3 (2010) doi:10.12942/lrr-2010-3 [arXiv:1002.4928 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2010-3 2010

  16. [16]

    Capozziello, M

    S. Capozziello and M. De Lau- rentis, Phys. Rept.509, 167-321 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003 [arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003 2011

  17. [17]

    S., Nojiri, S

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D84, 024020 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024020 [arXiv:1104.2669 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024020 2011

  18. [18]

    Lovelock, J

    D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys.12, 498-501 (1971) doi:10.1063/1.1665613

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1665613 1971

  19. [19]

    and Dicke, R

    C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev.124, 925- 935 (1961) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.124.925

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 1961

  20. [20]

    Rastall, Phys

    P. Rastall, Phys. Rev. D6, 3357-3359 (1972) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.6.3357

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.6.3357 1972

  21. [21]

    H. R. Fazlollahi, Eur. Phys. J. C83, no.10, 923 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12003-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12003-x 2023

  22. [22]

    Jacobson, Phys

    T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1260- 1263 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260 [arXiv:gr-qc/9504004 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.1260 1995

  23. [23]

    Padmanabhan, Phys

    T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rept.406, 49- 125 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.003 [arXiv:gr-qc/0311036 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.003 2005

  24. [24]

    Eling, R

    C. Eling, R. Guedens and T. Jacob- son, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 121301 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.121301 [arXiv:gr- qc/0602001 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.121301 2006

  25. [25]

    Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New insights, Rept

    T. Padmanabhan, Rept. Prog. Phys.73, 046901 (2010) doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/4/046901 [arXiv:0911.5004 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/4/046901 2010

  26. [26]

    R. G. Cai and S. P. Kim, JHEP02, 050 (2005) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/050 [arXiv:hep- th/0501055 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/050 2005

  27. [27]

    Akbar and R

    M. Akbar and R. G. Cai, Phys. Lett. B635, 7-10 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.02.035 [arXiv:hep-th/0602156 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.02.035 2006

  28. [28]

    Sheykhi, Modified Friedmann Equations from Tsallis Entropy, Phys

    A. Sheykhi, Phys. Lett. B785, 118-126 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.08.036 [arXiv:1806.03996 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.08.036 2018

  29. [29]

    Sheykhi, Modified cosmology through Barrow entropy, Phys

    A. Sheykhi, Phys. Rev. D107, no.2, 023505 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.023505 [arXiv:2210.12525 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.023505 2023

  30. [30]

    H. R. Fazlollahi, Eur. Phys. J. C83, no.1, 29 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11183-w [arXiv:2208.12048 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11183-w 2023

  31. [31]

    Lymperis, S

    A. Lymperis, S. Basilakos and E. N. Sari- dakis, Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.11, 1037 (2021) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09852-9 [arXiv:2108.12366 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09852-9 2021

  32. [32]

    Raychaudhuri, Phys

    A. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev.98, 1123-1126 (1955) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.98.1123 9

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.98.1123 1955

  33. [33]

    Donnelly and A

    W. Donnelly and A. C. Wall, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, no.11, 111603 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.111603 [arXiv:1412.1895 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.111603 2015

  34. [34]

    S. N. Solodukhin, Living Rev. Rel.14, 8 (2011) doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-8 [arXiv:1104.3712 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-8 2011

  35. [35]

    J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231-252 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 [arXiv:hep- th/9711200 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 1998

  36. [36]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 181602 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602 [arXiv:hep- th/0603001 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 2006

  37. [37]

    Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics,

    C. Tsallis, J. Statist. Phys.52, 479-487 (1988) doi:10.1007/BF01016429

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01016429 1988

  38. [38]

    Y. S. Myung, Y. W. Kim and Y. J. Park, Phys. Lett. B645, 393-397 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.12.062 [arXiv:gr- qc/0609031 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.12.062 2007

  39. [39]

    Xiang and X

    L. Xiang and X. Q. Wen, JHEP10, 046 (2009) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/046 [arXiv:0901.0603 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/046 2009

  40. [40]

    K. A. Meissner, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 5245- 5252 (2004) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/22/015 [arXiv:gr-qc/0407052 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/22/015 2004

  41. [41]

    Ashtekar, J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi and K. Kras- nov, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 904-907 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.904 [arXiv:gr- qc/9710007 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.904 1998

  42. [42]

    Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B379, 99-104 (1996) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0 [arXiv:hep-th/9601029 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0 1996

  43. [43]

    Agullo and P

    I. Agullo and P. Singh, doi:10.1142/9789813220003 0007 [arXiv:1612.01236 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1142/9789813220003

  44. [44]

    Ashtekar, Gen

    A. Ashtekar, Gen. Rel. Grav.41, 707-741 (2009) doi:10.1007/s10714-009-0763-4 [arXiv:0812.0177 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-009-0763-4 2009

  45. [45]

    J. D. Barrow and K. E. Kunze, Chaos Soli- tons Fractals10, 257 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0960- 0779(98)00183-0 [arXiv:gr-qc/9807040 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0960- 1999

  46. [46]

    String cosmology: From the early universe to today,

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maha- rana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala, Phys. Rept.1059, 1-155 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.002 [arXiv:2303.04819 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.002 2024

  47. [47]

    McAllister and E

    L. McAllister and E. Silverstein, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40, 565-605 (2008) doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0556- 6 [arXiv:0710.2951 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0556- 2008

  48. [48]

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, Phys. Rev.136, B571-B576 (1964) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.136.B571

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b571 1964

  49. [49]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199- 220 (1975) [erratum: Commun. Math. Phys.46, 206 (1976)] doi:10.1007/BF02345020

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975

  50. [50]

    Susskind, J

    L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys.36, 6377- 6396 (1995) doi:10.1063/1.531249 [arXiv:hep- th/9409089 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.531249 1995

  51. [51]

    J. M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A43, no.4, 2046 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.43.2046

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.43.2046 2046

  52. [52]

    J. E. Moyal, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.45, 99- 124 (1949) doi:10.1017/S0305004100000487

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100000487 1949

  53. [53]

    R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18474.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2011MNRAS.414.1418K 414, 1418

    F. Melia and A. Shevchuk, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.419, 2579-2586 (2012) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19906.x [arXiv:1109.5189 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19906.x 2012

  54. [54]

    A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D23, 347-356 (1981) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 1981

  55. [55]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D15, 2738-2751 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2738 1977