pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10272 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · 💻 cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

The Phase Is the Gradient: Equilibrium Propagation for Frequency Learning in Kuramoto Networks

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords Kuramoto oscillatorsequilibrium propagationfrequency learningphase gradientoscillator networksspectral seedingmachine learning
0
0 comments X

The pith

In stable Kuramoto networks, phase displacement from weak output nudging equals the loss gradient with respect to natural frequencies in the zero-nudge limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This work shows that the physical phase shifts in a Kuramoto oscillator network, when the outputs are nudged slightly, directly provide the gradient of the loss function with respect to the natural frequencies of the oscillators. The equality becomes exact as the nudge strength approaches zero. This allows natural frequencies to be learned as parameters using equilibrium propagation. Experiments on sparse layered networks demonstrate that learning frequencies yields better performance than learning couplings at equal parameter budgets. A spectral seeding strategy based on topology resolves convergence problems that arise from random initialization.

Core claim

We prove that in a coupled Kuramoto oscillator network at stable equilibrium, the physical phase displacement under weak output nudging is the gradient of the loss with respect to natural frequencies, with equality as the nudging strength beta tends to zero.

What carries the argument

Phase displacement under weak nudging, which computes the gradient for updating natural frequencies without requiring explicit differentiation through the dynamics.

If this is right

  • Frequency learning achieves 96.0% accuracy compared to 83.3% for coupling-weight learning at matched parameter counts on sparse layered topologies.
  • Convergence failure rates of about 50% under random initialization stem from the loss landscape and are eliminated by topology-aware spectral seeding, reaching 100% convergence.
  • Natural frequency updates remain viable when coupling weights are fixed.
  • The method applies to both the primary classification task and additional settings including larger architectures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The phase-gradient identity could enable direct hardware implementations where phase measurements replace computed gradients in oscillator-based processors.
  • If the identity holds approximately at finite nudge strengths, training could use larger beta values to accelerate convergence without sacrificing accuracy.
  • Similar gradient extraction might be possible in other phase-based dynamical systems beyond Kuramoto oscillators.

Load-bearing premise

The network reaches a stable equilibrium under the chosen dynamics, and the gradient equality holds strictly only as the nudging strength beta approaches zero.

What would settle it

Measure the phase displacements for decreasing values of beta and compare them to independently computed gradients of the loss with respect to natural frequencies; persistent mismatch as beta shrinks would disprove the equality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10272 by Mani Rash Ahmadi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The two-phase gradient readout protocol. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Gradient identity verification. (a) Per-node scatter of the two-phase gradient vs. the analytical gradient at N = 15, β = 10−3 : all points fall on y = x (cosine similarity = 1.000000). (b) Equilibrium residual across network sizes from N = 6 to N = 200; all residuals are at or below machine ϵ. The cosine similarity is 1.000000 at every scale. 5 Numerical Verification We compute ∂L/∂ω c by four methods: (1… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Parameter ablation on /a/ vs /i/ (100 seeds, sparse layered 2+5+2 topology). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Convergence failure is a landscape problem, not a gradient problem. A converging [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral seeding eliminates the random-initialization basin failure (100 seeds, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We prove that in a coupled Kuramoto oscillator network at stable equilibrium, the physical phase displacement under weak output nudging is the gradient of the loss with respect to natural frequencies, with equality as the nudging strength beta tends to zero. Prior oscillator equilibrium propagation work explicitly set aside natural frequency as a learnable parameter; we show that on sparse layered architectures, frequency learning outperforms coupling-weight learning among converged seeds (96.0% vs. 83.3% at matched parameter counts, p = 1.8e-12). The approximately 50% convergence failure rate under random initialization is a loss-landscape property, not a gradient error; topology-aware spectral seeding eliminates it in all settings tested (46/100 to 100/100 seeds on the primary task; 50/50 on a second task, K-only training, and a larger architecture).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proves that in a coupled Kuramoto oscillator network at stable equilibrium, the physical phase displacement under weak output nudging equals the gradient of the loss with respect to natural frequencies, with equality in the limit as nudging strength β tends to zero. It reports that frequency learning outperforms coupling-weight learning on sparse layered architectures (96.0% vs. 83.3% accuracy at matched parameter counts, p=1.8e-12) and that topology-aware spectral seeding eliminates the ~50% random-initialization convergence failures observed across tasks and architectures.

Significance. If the central equality holds and is practically usable, the work extends equilibrium propagation to natural-frequency parameters in oscillator networks, providing a physically grounded, parameter-free gradient mechanism. The reported performance edge for frequency learning and the seeding fix for convergence could be relevant for hardware oscillator implementations, provided the β→0 approximation is validated and equilibria remain stable under nudging.

major comments (3)
  1. [Proof and §4 (experiments)] The main theorem states equality only as β→0 at a stable fixed point, yet the experiments use finite β without any numerical verification that Δθ/β approximates the true gradient (e.g., via implicit differentiation of the equilibrium equations or autodiff on the same loss).
  2. [§3 (dynamics) and §5 (initialization)] The ~50% random-init failure rate is attributed to the loss landscape, but no analysis is given of how the nudging term modifies the Jacobian eigenvalues or basin size; this directly affects whether the stable-equilibrium assumption required for the gradient equality holds during training.
  3. [Results tables and §4.3] Table reporting 96.0% vs. 83.3% accuracy gives p=1.8e-12 but omits error bars, exact number of independent seeds per condition, data-exclusion rules, and whether the statistical test accounts for the spectral-seeding vs. random-init split.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the nudging term and loss function should be cross-referenced to prior equilibrium-propagation literature to clarify differences.
  2. [Abstract and §5] The abstract and main text use 'approximately 50%' for convergence failures; replace with exact fractions (e.g., 46/100) for precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the work.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Proof and §4 (experiments)] The main theorem states equality only as β→0 at a stable fixed point, yet the experiments use finite β without any numerical verification that Δθ/β approximates the true gradient (e.g., via implicit differentiation of the equilibrium equations or autodiff on the same loss).

    Authors: We agree that the central theorem establishes the exact gradient equality only in the limit as β → 0 at a stable fixed point. The experiments employ finite β for practical training, and we did not include explicit numerical checks comparing Δθ/β to the true gradient. We will add such verification to §4 by computing the true gradient via implicit differentiation of the equilibrium equations (or autodiff on the loss) and reporting the approximation error for the specific β values used across tasks and architectures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3 (dynamics) and §5 (initialization)] The ~50% random-init failure rate is attributed to the loss landscape, but no analysis is given of how the nudging term modifies the Jacobian eigenvalues or basin size; this directly affects whether the stable-equilibrium assumption required for the gradient equality holds during training.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that we provide no explicit analysis of the nudging term's influence on Jacobian eigenvalues or basin size. While the manuscript attributes the ~50% random-initialization failures to the loss landscape (supported by the fact that failures occur even in control settings without nudging), we acknowledge that a direct examination of how β perturbs the eigenvalues would better justify the stable-equilibrium assumption throughout training. We will add a concise discussion and numerical eigenvalue examples in §3 and §5 to address this. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results tables and §4.3] Table reporting 96.0% vs. 83.3% accuracy gives p=1.8e-12 but omits error bars, exact number of independent seeds per condition, data-exclusion rules, and whether the statistical test accounts for the spectral-seeding vs. random-init split.

    Authors: We agree that the statistical reporting in the tables and §4.3 is incomplete. We will revise the tables to include error bars (standard deviations across runs), state the exact number of independent seeds (100 for the primary task, 50 for secondary tasks), clarify data-exclusion rules (accuracy reported only on converged seeds, with separate convergence rates), and specify that the two-sample t-test is applied to the converged runs while accounting for the spectral-seeding versus random-initialization split. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from model equations

full rationale

The paper's core claim is a mathematical proof that phase displacement under weak output nudging equals the gradient of the loss w.r.t. natural frequencies exactly in the beta to 0 limit, obtained via implicit differentiation of the equilibrium condition from the standard nudged Kuramoto dynamics. This is a direct consequence of the oscillator equations and equilibrium propagation definitions rather than any fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. Prior oscillator EP work is referenced only for context on why frequency learning was previously set aside; the new proof and sparse-layer experiments stand independently. No step reduces by construction to its inputs, and the reported convergence issues are treated as loss-landscape properties separate from the gradient equality.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard mathematical properties of the Kuramoto model and the equilibrium propagation framework; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the proof itself.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The coupled Kuramoto network reaches a stable equilibrium under the given dynamics
    Invoked to define the phase displacement at equilibrium; appears in the statement of the proof.
  • domain assumption Nudging strength beta can be taken to the limit of zero while preserving stability and differentiability
    Required for the equality to hold exactly; stated as the condition under which the gradient relation is proven.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1509 out tokens · 63137 ms · 2026-05-10T15:48:55.478904+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. Bai, J. Z. Kolter, and V. Koltun. Deep equilibrium models. In NeurIPS, 2019

  2. [2]

    F. R. K. Chung. Spectral Graph Theory. AMS, 1997

  3. [3]

    Dillavou, B

    S. Dillavou, B. Beyer, M. Stern, M. Z. Miskin, A. J. Liu, and D. J. Durian. Machine learning without a processor: Emergent learning in a nonlinear analog network. PNAS, 121(8):e2319718121, 2024

  4. [4]

    Ernoult, J

    M. Ernoult, J. Grollier, D. Querlioz, Y. Bengio, and B. Scellier. Updates of equilibrium prop match gradients of backprop through time in an RNN with static input. In NeurIPS, 2019

  5. [5]

    Gower et al

    A. Gower et al. How to train an oscillator I sing machine using equilibrium propagation. arXiv:2505.02103, 2025

  6. [6]

    Gower et al

    A. Gower et al. Learning at the speed of physics. arXiv:2510.12934, 2025

  7. [7]

    Energy-based trans- formers are scalable learners and thinkers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02092, 2025

    A. Gladstone et al. Energy-based transformers are scalable learners and thinkers. arXiv:2507.02092, 2025

  8. [8]

    Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces

    A. Gu and T. Dao. Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces. arXiv:2312.00752, 2023

  9. [9]

    Hillenbrand, L

    J. Hillenbrand, L. A. Getty, M. J. Clark, and K. Wheeler. Acoustic characteristics of A merican E nglish vowels. J.\ Acoust.\ Soc.\ Am., 97(5):3099--3111, 1995

  10. [10]

    J. J. Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. PNAS, 79(8):2554--2558, 1982

  11. [11]

    F. C. Hoppensteadt and E. M. Izhikevich. Oscillatory neurocomputers with dynamic connectivity. Physical Review Letters, 82(14):2983--2986, 1999

  12. [12]

    Kendall, R

    J. Kendall, R. Pantone, K. Manickavasagam, Y. Bengio, and B. Scellier. Training end-to-end analog neural networks with equilibrium propagation. arXiv:2006.01981, 2020

  13. [13]

    Korthikanti, J

    V. Korthikanti, J. Casper, S. Lym, L. McAfee, M. Andersch, M. Shoeybi, and B. Catanzaro. Reducing activation recomputation in large transformer models. In MLSys, 2023

  14. [14]

    Kuramoto

    Y. Kuramoto. Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence. Springer, 1984

  15. [15]

    DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model

    A. Liu et al. DeepSeek-V2 : A strong, economical, and efficient mixture-of-experts language model. arXiv:2405.04434, 2024

  16. [16]

    The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All large language models are in 1.58 bits.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17764, 2024

    S. Ma et al. The era of 1-bit LLMs : All large language models are in 1.58 bits. arXiv:2402.17764, 2024

  17. [17]

    Miyato, S

    T. Miyato, S. L\"owe, A. Geiger, and M. Welling. Artificial K uramoto oscillatory neurons. In ICLR, 2025

  18. [18]

    Momeni, B

    A. Momeni, B. Rahmani, B. Scellier, L. G. Wright, P. L. McMahon, C. C. Wanjura, et al. Training of physical neural networks. Nature, 645:53--61, 2025

  19. [19]

    Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training

    D. Patterson, J. Gonzalez, Q. Le, C. Liang, L.-M. Munguia, D. Rothchild, D. So, M. Texier, and J. Dean. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv:2104.10350, 2021

  20. [20]

    Rageau and J

    T. Rageau and J. Grollier. Training and synchronizing oscillator networks with equilibrium propagation. arXiv:2504.11884, 2025

  21. [21]

    Scellier and Y

    B. Scellier and Y. Bengio. Equilibrium propagation: Bridging the gap between energy-based models and backpropagation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11:24, 2017

  22. [22]

    Scellier

    B. Scellier. Generalization of equilibrium propagation to vector field dynamics. arXiv:1808.04873, 2018

  23. [23]

    Shazeer et al

    N. Shazeer et al. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. In ICLR, 2017

  24. [24]

    S. H. Strogatz. From K uramoto to C rawford: exploring the onset of synchronization. Physica D, 143(1--4):1--20, 2000

  25. [25]

    Todri-Sanial, C

    A. Todri-Sanial, C. Delacour, M. Abernot, and F. Sabo. Computing with oscillators from theoretical underpinnings to applications and demonstrators. npj Unconventional Computing, 1:15, 2024

  26. [26]

    Q. Wang, C. C. Wanjura, and F. Marquardt. Training coupled phase oscillators as a neuromorphic platform using equilibrium propagation. Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering, 4:034014, 2024

  27. [27]

    C. C. Wanjura and F. Marquardt. Quantum equilibrium propagation for efficient training of quantum systems based on O nsager reciprocity. Nature Communications, 16:3592, 2025

  28. [28]

    Xie and H

    X. Xie and H. S. Seung. Equivalence of backpropagation and contrastive H ebbian learning in a layered network. Neural Computation, 15(2):441--454, 2003

  29. [29]

    Zucchet and J

    N. Zucchet and J. Sacramento. Beyond backpropagation: Bilevel optimization through implicit differentiation and equilibrium propagation. Neural Computation, 34(12):2309--2346, 2022

  30. [30]

    Zoppo, F

    G. Zoppo, F. Marrone, M. Bonnin, and F. Corinto. Equilibrium propagation and (memristor-based) oscillatory neural networks. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp. 639--643, 2022