pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10653 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

On stress-assisted boundary migration during recrystallization

Yubin Zhang , Qiwei Shi , Guilin Wu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords recrystallizationboundary migrationresidual stressaluminumEBSDstrain analysisstress anisotropy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Recrystallization boundary migration aligns with local residual strain anisotropy in aluminum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tracks grain boundary motion during recrystallization in high-purity aluminum after cryogenic rolling using in-situ annealing combined with high-resolution EBSD and digital image correlation. It measures residual strains on the order of 10 to the minus 3 inside recrystallizing grains and several times higher in the surrounding deformed matrix. Stresses inside the new grains appear as a passive response to the deformed matrix, which itself depends on local dislocation boundary geometry and neighboring grain constraints. No shear-coupled boundary motion is detected even when shear stress acts across the boundary. Instead, migration directions correlate directly with the principal components of the local residual strain field, pointing to control by stress anisotropy.

Core claim

Recrystallization boundary migration is modulated by the anisotropy of the local internal stress state, revealed by the direct correlation between principal residual strain components and observed migration directions, while stresses in recrystallizing grains respond passively to the surrounding deformed matrix and shear-coupled motion is absent despite applied shear stress.

What carries the argument

Correlation between principal residual strain components and boundary migration directions, which establishes modulation by local internal stress anisotropy.

If this is right

  • Migration directions can be anticipated from measured principal strain fields in the deformed matrix.
  • Stresses inside recrystallizing grains arise passively from constraints and dislocation structures in adjacent grains.
  • Shear stress across the boundary does not produce detectable shear-coupled motion in this material system.
  • Residual strains remain lower inside recrystallizing grains than in the deformed matrix by a factor of several.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If stress anisotropy dominates, controlled changes to dislocation boundary geometry could steer preferred migration paths in annealing.
  • The passive stress response in new grains may appear in other annealing processes where deformed matrices impose local constraints.
  • In situ strain mapping during annealing in other metals could test whether the same strain-migration correlation holds.
  • Incorporating anisotropic stress tensors into recrystallization models would allow quantitative prediction of boundary paths.

Load-bearing premise

The correlation between residual strain patterns and boundary migration directions means anisotropy of the local stress state is the dominant mechanism rather than unmeasured variables such as local temperature or dislocation interactions.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment in which boundary migration directions remain uncorrelated with principal strain axes under uniform stress conditions would falsify the modulation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10653 by Guilin Wu, Qiwei Shi, Yubin Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: ECC image (a) and EBSD map (b) showing the microstructure of the initial partially [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Particles and deformed subregions selected for the in-plane strain analysis, together [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: EBSD results at GB2. (a) EBSD map colored according to the crystallographic orien [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In-plane elastic strain maps for (a–c) the recrystallizing grain and (d–f) the deformed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stored energy distribution: (a) plastic strain contribution determined from KAM val [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Principal strain/stress analysis and their relationship to local boundary migration pat￾terns. (a) Average principal strain tensor for the deformed matrix in front of GB1, superimposed on part of the deformed matrix and recrystallization boundary traces. The red parallelogram il￾lustrates the residual in-plane deformation matrix within the deformed grain, referenced to the dashed black square at a signific… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Surface morphology measured by AFM in a region across GB1, ten months after the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic illustration of the interaction between residual strain and volume shrinkage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study investigates the boundary migration mechanisms near the sample surface of recrystallizing grains in high-purity Al subjected to cryogenic rolling. Local strain and stress tensors were characterized during \textit{in situ} annealing by combining high-resolution electron backscatter diffraction with microstructure-based digital image correlation strain analysis. The results reveal local residual strains on the order of $10^{-3}$ within the recrystallizing grain, with values several times higher in the adjacent deformed matrix. The residual stresses in recrystallizing grains are a passive response to those developed within the surrounding deformed grains; the latter being strongly influenced by the local geometry and characteristics of dislocation boundaries, as well as by constraints imposed by neighboring grains. No evidence of shear-coupled motion was observed during the recrystallization boundary migration, despite the presence of shear stress across the boundary. In contrast, detailed analysis of the principal strain components reveals a clear correlation between residual strain patterns and boundary migration directions. These findings indicate that recrystallization boundary migration is modulated by the anisotropy of the local internal stress state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This experimental study examines recrystallization boundary migration near the surface in cryogenically rolled high-purity Al using in situ annealing combined with high-resolution EBSD and microstructure-based DIC. Local residual strains of order 10^{-3} are measured (higher in the deformed matrix), stresses in recrystallizing grains are characterized as a passive response to matrix stresses shaped by dislocation boundary geometry and grain constraints, no shear-coupled motion is observed despite shear stresses across boundaries, and a correlation is reported between principal residual strain components and observed migration directions, leading to the conclusion that migration is modulated by anisotropy of the local internal stress state.

Significance. If the reported correlation is shown to support a causal modulating role for stress anisotropy (rather than joint determination by unmeasured factors), the findings would advance mechanistic understanding of recrystallization in deformed metals by providing direct in situ evidence distinguishing stress effects from shear coupling. The combination of HR-EBSD with DIC for tensorial strain mapping during annealing and the explicit ruling out of shear coupling represent clear experimental strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that the observed correlation indicates modulation by stress anisotropy (rather than both quantities being jointly determined by dislocation substructure) is load-bearing but rests on qualitative description of a 'clear correlation' without quantitative support such as a reported correlation coefficient, regression slope, or statistical test of significance between principal strain directions and migration vectors.
  2. No quantitative model is provided linking the measured principal strain directions (inferred from residual strains ~10^{-3}) to migration velocity or direction, nor are alternative drivers such as local stored-energy gradients or minor temperature inhomogeneities explicitly tested or controlled for in the analysis of migration paths.
minor comments (2)
  1. Expand the methods description to include explicit criteria for data exclusion, error propagation in the DIC strain analysis, and how migration directions were independently extracted from the time-lapse images.
  2. Figure captions and the results section should clarify the spatial registration between strain maps and boundary positions to allow readers to assess potential alignment artifacts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments, which highlight both the strengths of the experimental approach and areas where the presentation can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the observed correlation indicates modulation by stress anisotropy (rather than both quantities being jointly determined by dislocation substructure) is load-bearing but rests on qualitative description of a 'clear correlation' without quantitative support such as a reported correlation coefficient, regression slope, or statistical test of significance between principal strain directions and migration vectors.

    Authors: We agree that the correlation is presented qualitatively and that quantitative metrics would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a quantitative analysis of the relationship between principal residual strain directions and migration vectors, including correlation coefficients, regression slopes where appropriate, and statistical significance tests. These additions will help distinguish modulation by stress anisotropy from joint determination by the dislocation substructure. The in situ observations already demonstrate consistent directional alignment across multiple boundaries, but the requested metrics will provide additional rigor. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No quantitative model is provided linking the measured principal strain directions (inferred from residual strains ~10^{-3}) to migration velocity or direction, nor are alternative drivers such as local stored-energy gradients or minor temperature inhomogeneities explicitly tested or controlled for in the analysis of migration paths.

    Authors: The study is observational and does not include a quantitative predictive model relating residual strains to migration velocity or direction; such modeling lies outside the scope of the present experimental work. We will revise the discussion to address alternative drivers more explicitly. Local stored-energy gradients are already contrasted via the measured strain magnitudes (higher in the deformed matrix) and the passive stress response in recrystallizing grains. Temperature inhomogeneities are minimized by the controlled in situ annealing conditions and high-purity material; we will add explicit statements clarifying why these alternatives are unlikely to dominate based on the observed lack of shear coupling and the correlation with principal strain components. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Development of a quantitative model that links the measured principal residual strains (~10^{-3}) to boundary migration velocity or direction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational experimental study with direct measurements

full rationale

The paper reports in-situ EBSD + DIC measurements of residual strains (~10^{-3}) and boundary migration directions during recrystallization annealing. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations appear in the provided text or abstract. The claimed correlation between principal strain patterns and migration directions is presented as an empirical observation, not derived from or equivalent to any input by construction. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, fitted predictions, or author self-citations. This matches the default expectation for non-circular experimental work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard materials characterization assumptions rather than new postulates or fitted quantities. No free parameters are introduced to support the stress-modulation conclusion, and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Measured local strains can be interpreted as residual stresses using the material's known elastic response without dominant plastic relaxation during the observed annealing stage.
    This underpins the translation of strain tensors into stress states that are then linked to boundary migration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5469 in / 1199 out tokens · 66776 ms · 2026-05-10T16:04:00.678705+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F. J. Humphreys, G. S. Rohrer, A. Rollett, Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phe- nomena, Elsevier, 2017.doi:10.1016/B978-008044164-1/50005-0

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-008044164-1/50005-0 2017

  2. [2]

    Zhang, R

    Y . Zhang, R. Barabash, High resolution mapping of orientation and strain gradients in metals by synchrotron 3d x-ray laue microdiffraction, Quantum Beam Science 3 (2019) 6. doi:10.3390/qubs3010006

    work page doi:10.3390/qubs3010006 2019

  3. [3]

    Cheng , author X

    A. Lindkvist, W. Liu, D. Juul Jensen, Y . Zhang, 3d mapping of residual stresses in growing grains of partially recrystallized gum metal, Materials Research Letters 11 (2023) 942–948. doi:10.1080/21663831.2023.2267094

    work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2023.2267094 2023

  4. [4]

    S. Lee, T. D. Berman, C. Yildirim, C. Detlefs, J. E. Allison, A. Bucsek, Multi- scale in-situ characterization of static recrystallization using dark-field x-ray microscopy and high-resolution x-ray diffraction, Scientific Reports 14 (2024).doi:10.1038/ s41598-024-56546-9

    2024

  5. [5]

    Zhang, T

    Y . Zhang, T. Yu, R. Xu, J. Thorborg, W. Liu, J. Tischler, A. Godfrey, D. Juul Jensen, Local residual stresses and microstructure within recrystallizing grains in iron, Materials Characterization 191 (2022) 112113.doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112113

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112113 2022

  6. [6]

    Zhang, W

    Y . Zhang, W. Ludwig, Selective growth of recrystallizing grains into well-characterized deformed aluminum at hardness indentation, Acta Materialia 270 (2024) 119862.doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119862

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119862 2024

  7. [8]

    T. Q. Phan, I. F. Lee, L. E. Levine, J. Z. Tischler, Y . Huang, A. G. Fox, T. G. Langdon, M. E. Kassner, X-ray microbeam measurements of long-range internal stresses in commercial- purity aluminum processed by multiple passes of equal-channel angular pressing, Scripta Materialia 93 (2014) 48–51.doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.001 2014

  8. [10]

    B. C. Larson, L. E. Levine, Submicrometre-resolution polychromatic three-dimensional x- ray microscopy, Journal of Applied Crystallography 46 (2013) 153–164.doi:10.1107/ S0021889812043737

    2013

  9. [11]

    B. C. Larson, W. Yang, G. E. Ice, J. D. Budai, J. Z. Tischler, Three-dimensional x-ray structural microscopy with submicrometre resolution, Nature 415 (2002) 887–890.doi: 10.1038/415887a

    work page doi:10.1038/415887a 2002

  10. [12]

    Hayashi, D

    Y . Hayashi, D. Setoyama, Y . Hirose, T. Yoshida, H. Kimura, Intragranular three- dimensional stress tensor fields in plastically deformed polycrystals, Science 366 (2019) 1492–1496.doi:10.1126/science.aax9167

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aax9167 2019

  11. [13]

    N. A. Henningsson, S. A. Hall, P. Wright, Reconstructing intragranular strain fields in polycrystalline materials from scanning 3dxrd data, Journal of Applied Crystallography 53 (2020) 1–37.doi:10.1107/S1600576720001016

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576720001016 2020

  12. [14]

    Henningsson, M

    A. Henningsson, M. Kutsal, J. P. Wright, W. Ludwig, H. O. Sørensen, S. A. Hall, G. Winther, H. F. Poulsen, Microstructure and stress mapping in 3d at industrially rel- evant degrees of plastic deformation, Scientific Reports 14 (2024).doi:10.1038/ s41598-024-71006-0

    2024

  13. [15]

    W. Li, H. Sharma, K. Peter, S. Ravi, H. Sehitoglu, A. Bucsek, Resolving intra- granular stress fields in plastically deformed titanium using point-focused high-energy diffraction microscopy, Journal of Materials Research 38 (2023).doi:10.1557/ s43578-022-00873-y

    2023

  14. [16]

    Wright, C

    J. Wright, C. Giacobbe, M. Majkut, New opportunities at the materials science beamline at esrf to exploit high energy nano-focus x-ray beams, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 24 (2020) 100818.doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2020.100818

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2020.100818 2020

  15. [17]

    L. E. Levine, C. Okoro, R. Xu, Full elastic strain and stress tensor measurements from individual dislocation cells in copper through-si vias, IUCrJ 2 (2015) 635–642.doi:10. 1107/S2052252515015031

    2015

  16. [18]

    Ernould, B

    C. Ernould, B. Beausir, J. J. Fundenberger, V . Taupin, E. Bouzy, Measuring elastic strains and orientation gradients by scanning electron microscopy: Conventional and emerging methods, in: Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 2022.doi:10.1016/bs.aiep. 2022.07.001

    work page doi:10.1016/bs.aiep 2022

  17. [19]

    T. B. Britton, A. J. Wilkinson, High resolution electron backscatter diffraction measure- ments of elastic strain variations in the presence of larger lattice rotations, Ultramicroscopy 114 (2012) 82–95.doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.01.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.01.004 2012

  18. [20]

    Jiang, T

    J. Jiang, T. B. Britton, A. J. Wilkinson, Mapping type iii intragranular residual stress distributions in deformed copper polycrystals, Acta Materialia 61 (2013) 5895–5904. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.038

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.038 2013

  19. [22]

    T. J. Ruggles, W. G. Gilliland, D. T. Fullwood, J. Kacher, An overview of hr-ebsd tech- niques for mapping local stress and dislocations in crystalline materials at sub-micron res- olution, Progress in Materials Science (2025) 101585doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025. 101585

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025 2025

  20. [23]

    Q. Shi, S. Roux, F. Latourte, F. Hild, Estimation of elastic strain by integrated image correlation on electron diffraction patterns, Ultramicroscopy 199 (2019) 16–33.doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.02.001 2019

  21. [24]

    Vermeij, J.P .M

    T. Vermeij, J. P. M. Hoefnagels, A consistent full-field integrated dic framework for hr- ebsd, Ultramicroscopy 191 (2018) 44–50.doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.05.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.05.001 2018

  22. [25]

    T. J. Ruggles, G. F. Bomarito, R. L. Qiu, J. D. Hochhalter, New levels of high angular resolution ebsd performance via inverse compositional gauss–newton based digital image correlation, Ultramicroscopy 195 (2018) 85–92.doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.08. 020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.08 2018

  23. [26]

    Q. Shi, H. Zhong, D. Loisnard, L. Wang, Z. Chen, H. Wang, S. Roux, Enhanced ebsd calibration accuracy based on gradients of diffraction patterns, Materials Characterization 202 (2023).doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113022 2023

  24. [27]

    Q. Shi, H. Zhong, D. Loisnard, M. Nowell, M. Mollens, Z. Chen, H. Wang, S. Roux, Towards measuring absolute residual stress by hr-ebsd with simulated reference patterns, Materials Characterization 218 (2024).doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2024.114508

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2024.114508 2024

  25. [28]

    Z. Chen, W. Lenthe, J. C. Stinville, M. Echlin, T. M. Pollock, S. Daly, High-resolution deformation mapping across large fields of view using scanning electron microscopy and digital image correlation, Experimental Mechanics 58 (2018) 1407–1421.doi:10.1007/ s11340-018-0419-y

    2018

  26. [29]

    Schreier, J

    H. Schreier, J. J. Orteu, M. A. Sutton, Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Defor- mation Measurements: Basic Concepts, Theory and Applications, Springer US, 2009. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78747-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78747-3 2009

  27. [30]

    T. C. Chu, W. F. Ranson, M. A. Sutton, W. H. Peters, Applications of digital-image- correlation techniques to experimental mechanics, Experimental Mechanics (1985) 232– 244doi:10.1007/BF02325092

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02325092 1985

  28. [31]

    Di Gioacchino, J

    F. Di Gioacchino, J. Quinta da Fonseca, Plastic strain mapping with sub-micron resolution using digital image correlation, Experimental Mechanics 53 (2013) 743–754.doi:10. 1007/s11340-012-9685-2

    2013

  29. [32]

    Zhang, A

    S. Zhang, A. Godfrey, C. Zhang, W. Liu, D. Juul Jensen, Surface patterning for combined digital image correlation and electron backscatter diffraction in-situ deformation experi- ments, Materials Characterization 164 (2020).doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110332

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110332 2020

  30. [33]

    Besnard, F

    G. Besnard, F. Hild, S. Roux, Finite-element displacement fields analysis from digital images: Application to portevin–le ch ˆatelier bands, Experimental Mechanics 46 (2006). doi:10.1007/s11340-006-9824-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11340-006-9824-8 2006

  31. [34]

    J. E. Brandenburg, D. A. Molodov, On shear coupled migration of low angle grain bound- aries, Scripta Materialia 163 (2019) 96–100.doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01. 009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01 2019

  32. [36]

    Winning, A

    M. Winning, A. D. Rollett, G. Gottstein, D. J. Srolovitz, A. Lim, L. S. Shvindlerman, 23 Mobility of low-angle grain boundaries in pure metals, Philosophical Magazine 90 (2010) 3107–3128.doi:10.1080/14786435.2010.481272

    work page doi:10.1080/14786435.2010.481272 2010

  33. [37]

    Winning, Strain-induced migration of tilt grain boundaries, Scripta Materialia 58 (2008) 85–88.doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.034

    M. Winning, Strain-induced migration of tilt grain boundaries, Scripta Materialia 58 (2008) 85–88.doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.034

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.034 2008

  34. [38]

    Mompiou, D

    F. Mompiou, D. Caillard, M. Legros, Grain boundary shear–migration coupling—i. in situ tem straining experiments in al polycrystals, Acta Materialia 57 (2009) 2198–2209.doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.014 2009

  35. [39]

    Legros, D

    M. Legros, D. S. Gianola, K. J. Hemker, In situ tem observations of fast grain-boundary motion in stressed nanocrystalline aluminum films, Acta Materialia 56 (2008) 3380–3393. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.032 2008

  36. [40]

    E. R. Homer, S. M. Foiles, E. A. Holm, D. L. Olmsted, Phenomenology of shear-coupled grain boundary motion in symmetric tilt and general grain boundaries, Acta Materialia 61 (2013) 1048–1060.doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.005 2013

  37. [41]

    S. L. Thomas, K. Chen, J. Han, P. K. Purohit, D. J. Srolovitz, Reconciling grain growth and shear-coupled grain boundary migration, Nature Communications 8 (2017) 1–12.doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01889-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01889-3 2017

  38. [42]

    T. J. Rupert, D. S. Gianola, Y . Gan, K. J. Hemker, Experimental observations of stress-driven grain boundary migration, Science 326 (2009) 1686–1690.doi:10.1126/ science.1178226

    2009

  39. [43]

    Bhattacharya, Y

    A. Bhattacharya, Y . F. Shen, C. M. Hefferan, S. F. Li, J. Lind, R. M. Suter, C. E. Krill, G. S. Rohrer, Grain boundary velocity and curvature are not correlated in ni polycrystals, Science 374 (2021).doi:10.1126/science.abj3210

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abj3210 2021

  40. [44]

    C. I. Qiu, D. J. Srolovitz, G. S. Rohrer, J. Han, M. Salvalaglio, Why grain growth is not curvature flow, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (2025) 2500707122. doi:10.1073/pnas.2500707122

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2500707122 2025

  41. [45]

    Zhang, W

    J. Zhang, W. Ludwig, Y . Zhang, H. H. B. Soerensen, D. Rowenhorst, A. Yamanaka, P. W. V oorhees, H. F. Poulsen, Grain boundary mobilities in polycrystals, Acta Materialia 191 (2020).doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.044

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.044 2020

  42. [46]

    D. A. Molodov, T. Gorkaya, G. Gottstein, Migration of theσ7 tilt grain boundary in al under an applied external stress, Scripta Materialia 65 (2011) 990–993.doi:10.1016/j. scriptamat.2011.08.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2011

  43. [47]

    Zhang, A

    Y . Zhang, A. Godfrey, D. Juul Jensen, In-situ investigation of local boundary migration during recrystallization, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 45A (2014) 2899– 2905.doi:10.1007/s11661-014-2222-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11661-014-2222-4 2014

  44. [48]

    Berny, T

    M. Berny, T. Archer, A. Mavel, P. Beauch ˆene, S. Roux, F. Hild, On the analysis of heat haze effects with spacetime dic, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 111 (2018) 135–153. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.06.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.06.004 2018

  45. [49]

    Besnard, H

    G. Besnard, H. Leclerc, F. Hild, S. Roux, N. Swiergiel, Analysis of image series through global digital image correlation, Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 47 (2012) 214–228.doi:10.1177/0309324712441435

    work page doi:10.1177/0309324712441435 2012

  46. [50]

    Kobayashi, Y

    M. Kobayashi, Y . Zhang, H. Ishikawa, J. Sun, J. Oddershede, D. Juul Jensen, H. Miura, Relationships between 3d grain structure and local inhomogeneous deformation: A laboratory-based multimodal x-ray tomography investigation, Acta Materialia 240 (2022) 118357.doi:10.2139/ssrn.3919740

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.3919740 2022

  47. [51]

    Singh, F

    S. Singh, F. Ram, M. De Graef, Emsoft: open source software for electron diffrac- tion/image simulations, Microscopy and Microanalysis 23 (2017).doi:10.1017/ 24 S143192761700174X

    2017

  48. [52]

    A. G. Every, A. K. McCurdy, Second and higher order elastic constants, in: D. F. Nelson (Ed.), Landolt-B ¨ornstein: Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, New Series, Group III, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992.doi:10.1007/ b44185

    1992

  49. [53]

    Bachmann, R

    F. Bachmann, R. Hielscher, H. Schaeben, Texture analysis with mtex – free and open source software toolbox, Solid State Phenomena 160 (2010) 63–68.doi:10.4028/www. scientific.net/SSP.160.63

    work page doi:10.4028/www 2010

  50. [54]

    D. A. Hughes, N. Hansen, High angle boundaries formed by grain subdivision mechanisms, Acta Materialia 45 (1997) 3871–3886.doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00027-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(97)00027-x 1997

  51. [55]

    Kohara, M

    S. Kohara, M. N. Parthasarathi, P. A. Beck, Anisotropy of boundary mobility, Journal of Applied Physics 29 (1958) 1125–1126.doi:10.1063/1.1723374

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1723374 1958

  52. [56]

    G. H. Fan, Y . B. Zhang, J. H. Driver, D. Juul Jensen, Oriented growth during recrys- tallization revisited in three dimensions, Scripta Materialia 72–73 (2014) 9–12.doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.09.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.09.031 2014

  53. [57]

    Godfrey, O

    A. Godfrey, O. V . Mishin, T. Yu, Characterization and influence of deformation microstruc- ture heterogeneity on recrystallization, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and En- gineering 89 (2015) 012003.doi:10.1088/1757-899X/89/1/012003

    work page doi:10.1088/1757-899x/89/1/012003 2015

  54. [58]

    Zhang, M

    H. Zhang, M. I. Mendelev, D. J. Srolovitz, Computer simulation of the elastically driven migration of a flat grain boundary, Acta Materialia 52 (2004) 2569–2576.doi:10.1016/ j.actamat.2004.02.005

    2004

  55. [59]

    E. F. F. Knipschildt-Okkels, Y . B. Zhang, X. Lei, T. Yu, W. Liu, S. Faester, R. E. Sanders, D. Juul Jensen, Multimodal 3d quantification of particle stimulated nucleation in industrially manufactured aluminium aa5182, Acta Materialia 282 (2025) 120446. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120446

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120446 2025

  56. [60]

    Hansen, D

    N. Hansen, D. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, Low energy dislocation structures due to unidirectional deformation at low temperatures, Materials Science and Engineering 81 (1986) 141–161. doi:10.1016/0025-5416(86)90258-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0025-5416(86)90258-2 1986

  57. [61]

    D. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, Theory of plastic deformation: properties of low energy disloca- tion structures, Materials Science and Engineering A 113 (1989) 1–41.doi:10.1016/ 0921-5093(89)90290-6

    1989

  58. [62]

    Oberdorfer, B

    B. Oberdorfer, B. Lorenzoni, K. Unger, W. Sprengel, M. Zehetbauer, R. Pippan, R. W ¨urschum, Absolute concentration of free volume-type defects in ultrafine-grained fe prepared by high-pressure torsion, Scripta Materialia 63 (2010) 452–455.doi:10.1016/ j.scriptamat.2010.05.007

    2010

  59. [63]

    E. M. Steyskal, B. Oberdorfer, W. Sprengel, M. Zehetbauer, R. Pippan, R. W ¨urschum, Direct experimental determination of grain boundary excess volume in metals, Physical Review Letters 108 (2012) 1–5.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.055504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.055504 2012

  60. [64]

    Zhang, A

    Y . Zhang, A. Godfrey, D. Juul Jensen, Kinetics of thermal grooving during low temperature recrystallization of pure aluminum, Materials Science Forum 753 (2013) 117–120.doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.753.117

    work page doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.753.117 2013

  61. [65]

    Huang, F

    Y . Huang, F. J. Humphreys, The effect of solutes on grain boundary mobility during recrys- tallization and grain growth in some single-phase aluminium alloys, Materials Chemistry and Physics 132 (2012) 166–174.doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.018 2012

  62. [66]

    Y . B. Zhang, Quantification of local mobilities, Scripta Materialia 146 (2018) 286–289. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.12.012. 25

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.12.012 2018

  63. [67]

    Zhang, Y

    J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, Local mobility variations along recrystallization boundaries, Materials & Design 258 (2025).doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114618

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114618 2025

  64. [68]

    Yadav, N

    V . Yadav, N. Moelans, Y . Zhang, D. Juul Jensen, Effects of dislocation boundary spacings and stored energy on boundary migration during recrystallization: A phase-field analysis, Acta Materialia 221 (2021).doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117377

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117377 2021

  65. [69]

    Kringhøj, A

    P. Kringhøj, A. N. Larsen, S. Y . Shirayev, Diffusion of sb in strained and relaxed si and sige, Physical Review Letters 76 (1996) 3372–3375.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3372

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.3372 1996

  66. [70]

    S. S. Iyer, F. K. Legoues, Thermal relaxation of pseudomorphic si-ge superlattices by enhanced diffusion and dislocation multiplication, Journal of Applied Physics 65 (1989) 4693–4698.doi:10.1063/1.343245

    work page doi:10.1063/1.343245 1989

  67. [71]

    M. J. Aziz, Thermodynamics of diffusion under pressure and stress: Relation to point defect mechanisms, Applied Physics Letters 70 (1997) 2810–2812.doi:10.1063/1.119066

    work page doi:10.1063/1.119066 1997

  68. [72]

    N. E. B. Cowern, P. C. Zalm, P. van der Sluis, D. J. Gravesteijn, W. B. de Boer, Diffu- sion in strained si(ge), Physical Review Letters 72 (1994) 2585–2588.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.72.2585

    1994

  69. [73]

    A. J. Ardell, S. V . Prikhodko, Coarsening ofγ′ in ni-al alloys aged under uniaxial compres- sion: Ii. diffusion under stress and retardation of coarsening kinetics, Acta Materialia 51 (2003) 5013–5019.doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00327-6. 26

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00327-6 2003