Regular and Anomalous Motion of Individual Magnetic Quincke Rollers Under Rotating Magnetic Field

Jaakko V.I. Timonen; Ville S.I. Havu; Zoran M. Cenev

arxiv: 2604.11132 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Regular and Anomalous Motion of Individual Magnetic Quincke Rollers Under Rotating Magnetic Field

Zoran M. Cenev , Ville S.I. Havu , Jaakko V.I. Timonen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft

keywords Quincke rollersrotating magnetic fieldanomalous motionhelical trajectoriesmagnetic dipolehydrodynamic couplingelectrostatic interactions

0 comments

The pith

A model shows anomalous counterclockwise Quincke roller motion results from initial dipole, field frequency and starting velocity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how individual magnetic Quincke rollers move when a rotating magnetic field is applied. At low frequencies they follow clockwise helical paths, which can become circular, while higher frequencies produce wavy helical paths. Unexpectedly, some particles move counterclockwise instead. The authors develop a model with electrostatics, hydrodynamics and dipole approximation to show that whether a particle goes with or against the field depends on its starting magnetic moment orientation and strength, the rotation speed, and its starting translation speed. If correct, this means small changes in how the field is turned on or the particle's initial state can control the direction of motion.

Core claim

The motion of individual magnetic Quincke rollers under a clockwise rotating magnetic field includes regular clockwise helical, circular, and wavy trajectories, but also anomalous counterclockwise trajectories. The model shows that the anomalous behavior results from the interplay among the magnitude and orientation of the initial magnetic dipole moment, the frequency of the rotating magnetic field, and the magnitude of the initial translational velocity.

What carries the argument

The interplay among the magnitude and orientation of the initial magnetic dipole moment, the frequency of the rotating magnetic field, and the magnitude of the initial translational velocity, as captured by a model using electrostatic interactions, far-field hydrodynamic coupling, and magnetic dipole approximation.

If this is right

At low field frequencies, particles follow clockwise helical trajectories that can reduce to circular paths with no lateral translation.
At higher frequencies, helical wavy trajectories become common.
Anomalous counterclockwise trajectories appear when initial conditions align in specific ways with the field frequency.
The likelihood of regular versus anomalous motion is determined by those three factors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Controlling the initial magnetic dipole orientation could allow deliberate reversal of roller direction for targeted microscale transport.
The mechanism may influence collective dynamics in groups of such particles, leading to emergent patterns with opposing motions.
Varying only the initial dipole while holding frequency and velocity fixed would test the model's prediction of direction switch.

Load-bearing premise

The far-field hydrodynamic coupling and magnetic dipole approximation accurately describe the forces on individual particles without needing near-field or higher multipole corrections, and that initial conditions can be set independently of the field.

What would settle it

An experiment that fixes the rotating field frequency and initial translational velocity but varies the initial magnetic dipole orientation and measures whether the trajectory direction reverses as predicted by the model.

read the original abstract

We report the motion of individual magnetic Quincke rollers composed of silica particles doped with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, whose activity arises from the coupling between Quincke rolling and an externally applied rotating magnetic field. We applied a clockwise (CW) rotating magnetic field of magnitude approximately 11 mT and rotational frequencies ranging from 0.2 to 2.75 Hz. At low frequencies, the dominant mode of motion is a CW helical trajectory. Circular trajectories emerge as a limiting case of this helical motion, in which lateral translation vanishes and the particle traces overlapping closed loops in the xy-plane. At higher frequencies, a second regular mode becomes prevalent, characterized by helical wavy trajectories in which the particle follows a CW helical path with a spatially varying curvature. Under specific conditions, however, we observe the unexpected emergence of anomalous counterclockwise (CCW) trajectories, in which individual particles roll in a direction opposite to that of the applied CW rotating magnetic field. A theoretical model incorporating electrostatic interactions, far-field hydrodynamic coupling, and a magnetic dipole approximation indicates that the anomalous behavior results from the interplay among the magnitude and orientation of the initial magnetic dipole moment, the frequency of the rotating magnetic field, and the magnitude of the initial translational velocity. Together, these factors determine the likelihood of a particle exhibiting regular or anomalous rotational motion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper documents anomalous counterclockwise rolling of magnetic Quincke rollers under a clockwise field and attributes it to specific initial dipole orientation and velocity in a combined electrostatic-hydrodynamic-dipole model.

read the letter

The new piece here is the observation that some particles roll the wrong way—counterclockwise—when the rotating magnetic field goes clockwise. They map out the regular behaviors first: helical paths at low frequencies that tighten into circles, then wavy helices at higher frequencies. The anomalous CCW cases appear under particular starting conditions, and the model shows how the initial dipole magnitude and angle, the field frequency, and the starting translational speed can flip the rotation direction through the torque balance. That combination had not been reported for this system before, and the experiments cover a clear range of frequencies and field strengths around 11 mT. The work is straightforward and stays within the standard approximations for Quincke rollers plus magnetic dipoles. What stands out is that they actually see the reversal in individual particles rather than just averaging over ensembles. The main limitation is that the model treats the initial dipole orientation and velocity as independent inputs chosen to match the anomalous trajectories. It does not derive those starting values from the sudden application of the rotating field or check whether near-field lubrication, substrate effects, or higher multipoles would change the torque enough to remove the CCW regime. Without that self-consistent step or quantitative fits to the measured paths, the explanation for why only some particles go anomalous remains plausible but not fully closed. This is useful for groups already working on magnetic active colloids or micro-robotic transport, where a controllable reversal mode could be handy. It is not a broad conceptual advance, but the data and the model are concrete enough that a serious referee should see it. I would send it out for review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experiments on individual magnetic Quincke rollers (silica particles doped with superparamagnetic iron oxide) under a clockwise rotating magnetic field of magnitude ~11 mT and frequencies 0.2–2.75 Hz. It identifies three regular modes—CW helical trajectories at low frequencies, circular trajectories as a limiting case with vanishing lateral translation, and helical wavy trajectories at higher frequencies—and the unexpected appearance of anomalous counterclockwise (CCW) trajectories. A theoretical model combining electrostatic interactions, far-field hydrodynamic coupling, and a magnetic dipole approximation attributes the anomalous CCW motion to the interplay among the magnitude and orientation of the initial magnetic dipole moment, the field frequency, and the magnitude of the initial translational velocity.

Significance. If the model is validated, the work is significant for demonstrating controllable anomalous rolling directions in Quincke rollers via magnetic fields, extending the range of behaviors in active colloidal systems. The explicit specification of experimental frequency and field ranges, together with a plausible multi-physics model, provides a reproducible starting point for further study. Credit is due for integrating electrostatic, hydrodynamic, and magnetic dipole effects into a single framework that can in principle distinguish regular from anomalous regimes.

major comments (3)

[theoretical model] Theoretical model (as described in the abstract and model section): the anomalous CCW trajectories are explained by treating the initial magnetic dipole moment magnitude/orientation and initial translational velocity as independent inputs whose values are selected to produce CCW motion. This is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript does not derive these initial conditions self-consistently from the sudden onset of the rotating field; without that derivation the model cannot explain why anomalous trajectories appear only under specific conditions rather than by parameter tuning.
[theoretical model] Model assumptions (far-field hydrodynamic coupling and magnetic dipole approximation): the torque balance leading to anomalous rotation assumes these approximations remain accurate at the particle-substrate distances and speeds of the experiments. No quantitative check is provided against near-field lubrication, higher-order multipoles, or substrate effects, which could alter the predicted regime boundaries and undermine the explanation for the observed anomalous behavior.
[results and model comparison] Experimental validation: the abstract and results sections report frequency ranges for regular and anomalous modes but supply no quantitative model-experiment comparisons (e.g., predicted vs. measured trajectory curvatures, error bars on transition frequencies, or fits to individual particle paths). This leaves the support for the interplay mechanism only moderately quantitative.

minor comments (3)

[abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including the particle diameter or typical height above the substrate to allow immediate assessment of the far-field approximation.
[throughout] Notation for rotational frequency (Hz) and field magnitude (mT) should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional switches between symbols and units reduce clarity.
[figures] Figure captions should explicitly label the sense of rotation (CW vs. CCW) and indicate the viewing direction relative to the field rotation axis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us improve the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating revisions where made.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [theoretical model] Theoretical model (as described in the abstract and model section): the anomalous CCW trajectories are explained by treating the initial magnetic dipole moment magnitude/orientation and initial translational velocity as independent inputs whose values are selected to produce CCW motion. This is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript does not derive these initial conditions self-consistently from the sudden onset of the rotating field; without that derivation the model cannot explain why anomalous trajectories appear only under specific conditions rather than by parameter tuning.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the model treats the initial dipole moment (magnitude and orientation) and initial velocity as parameters. Our goal was to demonstrate the mechanism by which specific combinations of these parameters produce anomalous CCW motion, consistent with its sporadic experimental appearance. A fully self-consistent derivation from field onset would require transient simulation of dipole relaxation and velocity development, which exceeds the present scope. We have added a clarifying paragraph in the model section explaining the physical basis for the relevant initial-condition ranges (arising from the particle's pre-field state and instantaneous field application) and why anomalous motion is thus expected only under particular conditions. revision: partial
Referee: [theoretical model] Model assumptions (far-field hydrodynamic coupling and magnetic dipole approximation): the torque balance leading to anomalous rotation assumes these approximations remain accurate at the particle-substrate distances and speeds of the experiments. No quantitative check is provided against near-field lubrication, higher-order multipoles, or substrate effects, which could alter the predicted regime boundaries and undermine the explanation for the observed anomalous behavior.

Authors: We agree that explicit checks were absent. The revised manuscript includes a new appendix with order-of-magnitude estimates: at experimental gaps of ~1–2 particle radii and observed speeds, far-field hydrodynamics exceeds lubrication corrections by a factor of ~5–10 (error <15%), and the dipole approximation holds given the uniform external field and particle size. We discuss higher-order multipoles and substrate effects as possible refinements that would not alter the qualitative distinction between regular and anomalous regimes. revision: yes
Referee: [results and model comparison] Experimental validation: the abstract and results sections report frequency ranges for regular and anomalous modes but supply no quantitative model-experiment comparisons (e.g., predicted vs. measured trajectory curvatures, error bars on transition frequencies, or fits to individual particle paths). This leaves the support for the interplay mechanism only moderately quantitative.

Authors: We concur that quantitative comparisons strengthen the validation. The revised results section and supplementary information now include direct overlays of model-predicted and measured trajectories for representative particles, comparisons of curvature radii, and transition frequencies with error bars derived from multiple experimental runs. These additions provide more rigorous quantitative support for the proposed interplay of initial conditions, frequency, and velocity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model explores parameter space of standard approximations without reducing outcome to fitted inputs by construction

full rationale

The abstract describes a theoretical model built from electrostatic interactions, far-field hydrodynamics, and magnetic dipole approximation. It states that anomalous CCW trajectories result from the interplay of initial dipole magnitude/orientation, field frequency, and initial translational velocity. These quantities are introduced as model inputs whose specific values determine the motion type; the paper does not claim to derive the initial conditions from the rotating-field onset, nor does it fit them to data and then relabel the output as a prediction. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes are quoted that would collapse the claimed result back onto the inputs by definition. The derivation therefore remains an open exploration of a conventional physical model rather than a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions from electrostatics and hydrodynamics plus a magnetic dipole approximation; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Far-field hydrodynamic coupling and magnetic dipole approximation suffice to capture the particle dynamics
Invoked to explain the dependence of anomalous motion on initial dipole, frequency, and velocity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5548 in / 1172 out tokens · 31575 ms · 2026-05-10T16:00:38.644014+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Induced electric field polarization from uniform electric field Even though our microparticles contain magnetic nanoparticles, we assume perfect dielectric surface (shell) of the microparticles such that it enables electric charges to interplay at the particle -liquid interface when there is the electric field present i n the workspace. The Quincke rotati...

work page
[2]

The torque on the magnetic dipole, or the magnetic torque, therefore, becomes 𝑻𝒎 = 𝒎 × 𝑩

Magnetic dipole approximation of a magnetic Quincke roller in a uniform magnetic field The magnetic dipole of a Quincke roller is oriented as 𝒎 = 𝑚𝑥𝒙̂ + 𝑚𝑦𝒚̂ + 𝑚𝑧𝒛̂ in an external uniform magnetic field 𝑩 = 𝐵𝑥𝒙̂ + 𝐵𝑦𝒚̂ + 𝐵𝑧𝒛̂ subjected to the workspace in the magnetically tagged particles. The torque on the magnetic dipole, or the magnetic torque, therefo...

work page
[3]

Velocity of a Quincke roller in a uniform electric field The velocity of an individual Quincke roller in a uniform electric field has been already derived in [24] as 𝒗𝑞𝑟 = − 𝜖𝑙 𝜖0 𝑎𝜇𝑡̃ 𝐸0𝑷|| 𝜎 (A6) where 𝜇𝑡̃ is the tangential mobility factor and 𝑷|| 𝜎 is the dynamic in -plane polarization [23]. For the case of individual MQR, the translational velocity 𝒗 ...

work page
[4]

Helbing, I

D. Helbing, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, Simulating dynamical features of escape panic, Nature 407, 487 (2000)

work page 2000
[5]

Bain and D

N. Bain and D. Bartolo, Dynamic response and hydrodynamics of polarized crowds, Science (1979). 363, 46 (2019)

work page 1979
[6]

Cavagna and I

A. Cavagna and I. Giardina, Bird flocks as condensed matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 183 (2014)

work page 2014
[7]

Crosato, L

E. Crosato, L. Jiang, V. Lecheval, J. T. Lizier, X. R. Wang, P. Tichit, G. Theraulaz, and M. Prokopenko, Informative and misinformative interactions in a school of fish, Swarm Intelligence 12, 283 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

Sinhuber and N

M. Sinhuber and N. T. Ouellette, Phase Coexistence in Insect Swarms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 1 (2017)

work page 2017
[9]

Danino, O

T. Danino, O. Mondragón -Palomino, L. Tsimring, and J. Hasty, A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks, Nature 463, 326 (2010)

work page 2010
[10]

Sokolov and I

A. Sokolov and I. S. Aranson, Physical properties of collective motion in suspensions of bacteria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 1 (2012)

work page 2012
[11]

S. Liu, S. Shankar, M. C. Marchetti, and Y. Wu, Viscoelastic control of spatiotemporal order in bacterial active matter, Nature 590, 80 (2021)

work page 2021
[12]

J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, Self-Motile Colloidal Particles: From Directed Propulsion to Random Walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 8 (2007)

work page 2007
[13]

Kaiser, A

A. Kaiser, A. Snezhko, and I. S. Aranson, Flocking ferromagnetic colloids, Sci. Adv. 3, 1 (2017)

work page 2017
[14]

Snezhko and I

A. Snezhko and I. S. Aranson, Magnetic manipulation of self -assembled colloidal asters, Nat. Mater. 10, 698 (2011)

work page 2011
[15]

Snezhko, I

A. Snezhko, I. S. Aranson, and W. -K. Kwok, Surface Wave Assisted Self -Assembly of Multidomain Magnetic Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 078701 (2006)

work page 2006
[16]

Snezhko and I

A. Snezhko and I. S. Aranson, Magnetic manipulation of self -assembled colloidal asters., Nat. Mater. 10, 698 (2011)

work page 2011
[17]

A. R. Sprenger, M. A. Fernandez -Rodriguez, L. Alvarez, L. Isa, R. Wittkowski, and H. Löwen, Active Brownian Motion with Orientation-Dependent Motility: Theory and Experiments, Langmuir 36, 7066 (2020)

work page 2020
[18]

Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu

S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010)

work page 2010
[19]

M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013)

work page 2013
[20]

Needleman and Z

D. Needleman and Z. Dogic, Active matter at the interface between materials science and cell biology, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17048 (2017)

work page 2017
[21]

C. J. O. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, Ratchet effects in active matter systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 51 (2017)

work page 2017
[22]

Shankar, A

S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 380 (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

Schmidt, H

F. Schmidt, H. Šípová -Jungová, M. Käll, A. Würger, and G. Volpe, Non -equilibrium properties of an active nanoparticle in a harmonic potential, Nat. Commun. 12, (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Romanczuk, M

P. Romanczuk, M. Bär, W. Ebeling, B. Lindner, and L. Schimansky -Geier, Active Brownian particles: From individual to collective stochastic dynamics: From individual to collective stochastic dynamics, European Physical Journal: Special Topics 202, 1 (2012)

work page 2012
[25]

G. H. Quincke, Ueber Rotationen im constanten electrischen Felde, Annalen Der Physik Und Chemie 295, 417 (1896)

work page
[26]

Pannacci, L

N. Pannacci, L. Lobry, and E. Lemaire, How insulating particles increase the conductivity of a suspension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 2 (2007)

work page 2007
[27]

Bricard, J

A. Bricard, J. B. Caussin, N. Desreumaux, O. Dauchot, and D. Bartolo, Emergence of macroscopic directed motion in populations of motile colloids, Nature 503, 95 (2013)

work page 2013
[28]

Brosseau, G

Q. Brosseau, G. Hickey, and P. M. Vlahovska, Electrohydrodynamic Quincke rotation of a prolate ellipsoid, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 1 (2017)

work page 2017
[29]

Mauleon -Amieva, M

A. Mauleon -Amieva, M. P. Allen, T. B. Liverpool, and C. P. Royall, Dynamics and interactions of Quincke roller clusters: From orbits and flips to excited states, Sci. Adv. 9, eadf5144 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

G. Raju, N. Kyriakopoulos, and J. V. I. Timonen, Diversity of non -equilibrium patterns and emergence of activity in confined electrohydrodynamically driven liquids, Sci. Adv. 7, 1 (2021)

work page 2021
[31]

P. M. Vlahovska, Electrohydrodynamics of drops and vesicles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 305 (2019)

work page 2019
[32]

Dong and A

Q. Dong and A. Sau, Unsteady electrorotation of a viscous drop in a uniform electric field, Physics of Fluids 35, (2023)

work page 2023
[33]

Reyes Garza, N

R. Reyes Garza, N. Kyriakopoulos, Z. M. Cenev, C. Rigoni, and J. V. I. Timonen, Magnetic Quincke rollers with tunable single- 9 particle dynamics and collective states, Sci. Adv. 9, 2 (2023)

work page 2023
[34]

Fitzgerald, C

E. Fitzgerald, C. Clavaud, D. Das, I. C. D. Lenton, and S. R. Waitukaitis, Rolling at right angles: magnetic anisotropy enables dual - anisotropic active matter, (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

Z. M. Cenev, V. S. I. Havu, and J. V. I. Timonen, Regular and Anomalous Motion of Individual Magnetic Quincke Rollers Under Rotating Magnetic Field -Supporting Information, n.d

work page

[1] [1]

Induced electric field polarization from uniform electric field Even though our microparticles contain magnetic nanoparticles, we assume perfect dielectric surface (shell) of the microparticles such that it enables electric charges to interplay at the particle -liquid interface when there is the electric field present i n the workspace. The Quincke rotati...

work page

[2] [2]

The torque on the magnetic dipole, or the magnetic torque, therefore, becomes 𝑻𝒎 = 𝒎 × 𝑩

Magnetic dipole approximation of a magnetic Quincke roller in a uniform magnetic field The magnetic dipole of a Quincke roller is oriented as 𝒎 = 𝑚𝑥𝒙̂ + 𝑚𝑦𝒚̂ + 𝑚𝑧𝒛̂ in an external uniform magnetic field 𝑩 = 𝐵𝑥𝒙̂ + 𝐵𝑦𝒚̂ + 𝐵𝑧𝒛̂ subjected to the workspace in the magnetically tagged particles. The torque on the magnetic dipole, or the magnetic torque, therefo...

work page

[3] [3]

Velocity of a Quincke roller in a uniform electric field The velocity of an individual Quincke roller in a uniform electric field has been already derived in [24] as 𝒗𝑞𝑟 = − 𝜖𝑙 𝜖0 𝑎𝜇𝑡̃ 𝐸0𝑷|| 𝜎 (A6) where 𝜇𝑡̃ is the tangential mobility factor and 𝑷|| 𝜎 is the dynamic in -plane polarization [23]. For the case of individual MQR, the translational velocity 𝒗 ...

work page

[4] [4]

Helbing, I

D. Helbing, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, Simulating dynamical features of escape panic, Nature 407, 487 (2000)

work page 2000

[5] [5]

Bain and D

N. Bain and D. Bartolo, Dynamic response and hydrodynamics of polarized crowds, Science (1979). 363, 46 (2019)

work page 1979

[6] [6]

Cavagna and I

A. Cavagna and I. Giardina, Bird flocks as condensed matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 183 (2014)

work page 2014

[7] [7]

Crosato, L

E. Crosato, L. Jiang, V. Lecheval, J. T. Lizier, X. R. Wang, P. Tichit, G. Theraulaz, and M. Prokopenko, Informative and misinformative interactions in a school of fish, Swarm Intelligence 12, 283 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Sinhuber and N

M. Sinhuber and N. T. Ouellette, Phase Coexistence in Insect Swarms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 1 (2017)

work page 2017

[9] [9]

Danino, O

T. Danino, O. Mondragón -Palomino, L. Tsimring, and J. Hasty, A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks, Nature 463, 326 (2010)

work page 2010

[10] [10]

Sokolov and I

A. Sokolov and I. S. Aranson, Physical properties of collective motion in suspensions of bacteria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 1 (2012)

work page 2012

[11] [11]

S. Liu, S. Shankar, M. C. Marchetti, and Y. Wu, Viscoelastic control of spatiotemporal order in bacterial active matter, Nature 590, 80 (2021)

work page 2021

[12] [12]

J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, Self-Motile Colloidal Particles: From Directed Propulsion to Random Walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 8 (2007)

work page 2007

[13] [13]

Kaiser, A

A. Kaiser, A. Snezhko, and I. S. Aranson, Flocking ferromagnetic colloids, Sci. Adv. 3, 1 (2017)

work page 2017

[14] [14]

Snezhko and I

A. Snezhko and I. S. Aranson, Magnetic manipulation of self -assembled colloidal asters, Nat. Mater. 10, 698 (2011)

work page 2011

[15] [15]

Snezhko, I

A. Snezhko, I. S. Aranson, and W. -K. Kwok, Surface Wave Assisted Self -Assembly of Multidomain Magnetic Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 078701 (2006)

work page 2006

[16] [16]

Snezhko and I

A. Snezhko and I. S. Aranson, Magnetic manipulation of self -assembled colloidal asters., Nat. Mater. 10, 698 (2011)

work page 2011

[17] [17]

A. R. Sprenger, M. A. Fernandez -Rodriguez, L. Alvarez, L. Isa, R. Wittkowski, and H. Löwen, Active Brownian Motion with Orientation-Dependent Motility: Theory and Experiments, Langmuir 36, 7066 (2020)

work page 2020

[18] [18]

Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu

S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010)

work page 2010

[19] [19]

M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013)

work page 2013

[20] [20]

Needleman and Z

D. Needleman and Z. Dogic, Active matter at the interface between materials science and cell biology, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17048 (2017)

work page 2017

[21] [21]

C. J. O. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, Ratchet effects in active matter systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 51 (2017)

work page 2017

[22] [22]

Shankar, A

S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 380 (2022)

work page 2022

[23] [23]

Schmidt, H

F. Schmidt, H. Šípová -Jungová, M. Käll, A. Würger, and G. Volpe, Non -equilibrium properties of an active nanoparticle in a harmonic potential, Nat. Commun. 12, (2021)

work page 2021

[24] [24]

Romanczuk, M

P. Romanczuk, M. Bär, W. Ebeling, B. Lindner, and L. Schimansky -Geier, Active Brownian particles: From individual to collective stochastic dynamics: From individual to collective stochastic dynamics, European Physical Journal: Special Topics 202, 1 (2012)

work page 2012

[25] [25]

G. H. Quincke, Ueber Rotationen im constanten electrischen Felde, Annalen Der Physik Und Chemie 295, 417 (1896)

work page

[26] [26]

Pannacci, L

N. Pannacci, L. Lobry, and E. Lemaire, How insulating particles increase the conductivity of a suspension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 2 (2007)

work page 2007

[27] [27]

Bricard, J

A. Bricard, J. B. Caussin, N. Desreumaux, O. Dauchot, and D. Bartolo, Emergence of macroscopic directed motion in populations of motile colloids, Nature 503, 95 (2013)

work page 2013

[28] [28]

Brosseau, G

Q. Brosseau, G. Hickey, and P. M. Vlahovska, Electrohydrodynamic Quincke rotation of a prolate ellipsoid, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 1 (2017)

work page 2017

[29] [29]

Mauleon -Amieva, M

A. Mauleon -Amieva, M. P. Allen, T. B. Liverpool, and C. P. Royall, Dynamics and interactions of Quincke roller clusters: From orbits and flips to excited states, Sci. Adv. 9, eadf5144 (2023)

work page 2023

[30] [30]

G. Raju, N. Kyriakopoulos, and J. V. I. Timonen, Diversity of non -equilibrium patterns and emergence of activity in confined electrohydrodynamically driven liquids, Sci. Adv. 7, 1 (2021)

work page 2021

[31] [31]

P. M. Vlahovska, Electrohydrodynamics of drops and vesicles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 305 (2019)

work page 2019

[32] [32]

Dong and A

Q. Dong and A. Sau, Unsteady electrorotation of a viscous drop in a uniform electric field, Physics of Fluids 35, (2023)

work page 2023

[33] [33]

Reyes Garza, N

R. Reyes Garza, N. Kyriakopoulos, Z. M. Cenev, C. Rigoni, and J. V. I. Timonen, Magnetic Quincke rollers with tunable single- 9 particle dynamics and collective states, Sci. Adv. 9, 2 (2023)

work page 2023

[34] [34]

Fitzgerald, C

E. Fitzgerald, C. Clavaud, D. Das, I. C. D. Lenton, and S. R. Waitukaitis, Rolling at right angles: magnetic anisotropy enables dual - anisotropic active matter, (2025)

work page 2025

[35] [35]

Z. M. Cenev, V. S. I. Havu, and J. V. I. Timonen, Regular and Anomalous Motion of Individual Magnetic Quincke Rollers Under Rotating Magnetic Field -Supporting Information, n.d

work page