pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11497 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: unknown

FIREFLY: heat load and particle exhaust approximations for rapid evaluation of divertor designs

Heinke Frerichs , Dieter Boeyaert , Yuhe Feng , Detlev Reiter
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords divertor designheat load approximationparticle exhaustfusion reactorgeometry optimizationmonte carlo trackingplasma backgroundfield line reconstruction
0
0 comments X

The pith

FIREFLY approximates divertor heat loads and particle exhaust to speed up design optimization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the FIREFLY package to quickly evaluate divertor designs in fusion reactors by extending field line reconstruction from a flux tube mesh. It uses a simplified heat transport model to approximate loads on divertor surfaces, then samples neutralized particles from that distribution and tracks them with Monte Carlo methods to estimate how efficiently they are exhausted through pumping surfaces. This rapid approach matters because divertors must handle extreme heat and remove particles effectively, and faster geometry testing could support more design iterations than full physics simulations allow. The authors show its use by optimizing a design for one stellarator device and checking how results change with different plasma background parameters.

Core claim

The FIREFLY package extends flux tube mesh field line reconstruction with a simplified heat transport model to approximate divertor loads, samples neutralized particles from the load distribution, and tracks molecules and atoms with EIRENE in a plasma background while accounting for dissociation, charge exchange, and ionization, removing particles on pumping surfaces to estimate exhaust efficiency for a given geometry, as explored through optimization and parameter sensitivity for the W7-X example.

What carries the argument

Simplified heat transport model on a flux tube mesh combined with Monte Carlo particle tracking to compute exhaust efficiency from sampled neutralized particles.

If this is right

  • Divertor geometries can be optimized iteratively using fast exhaust efficiency estimates.
  • Particle removal rates can be quantified for many design variants without running full plasma simulations.
  • The effect of different plasma background parameters on exhaust performance can be checked quickly.
  • Neutral particle sources derived from heat load distributions enable direct tracking of exhaust paths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approximation method could be linked to automated geometry generators to explore wider ranges of divertor shapes.
  • Applying the same workflow to other magnetic configurations might identify common design features that improve exhaust.
  • Validation against measured exhaust data from operating devices would clarify the range of geometries where the tool is reliable.

Load-bearing premise

The simplified heat transport model and chosen plasma background parameters are sufficiently accurate to produce useful exhaust-efficiency estimates for geometry optimization.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of exhaust efficiency predictions from FIREFLY against a full detailed simulation or experimental measurement for the exact same divertor geometry would settle whether the approximations hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11497 by Detlev Reiter, Dieter Boeyaert, Heinke Frerichs, Yuhe Feng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Heat loads qt on the divertor targets in W7-X computed by EMC3- EIRENE for PSOL = 3 MW with 20 % impurity radiation [19]. An additional 25 % of PSOL is lost to neutrals. Contributions from surface recombination that is usually included in the EMC3-EIRENE post-processing have been switched off here for direct comparison with ht. (b) Heat load proxy ht computed by FIREFLY with n0 = 2 · 1019 m−3 and T0 = … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Proxy for peak heat load max ht and (b) target averaged deviation from EMC3-EIRENE. Colored dots mark the conditions in the EMC3-EIRENE simulation at the separatrix (red) and averaged on the divertor targets (blue). The deviation is normalized to the best fit min χ 2 within this scan (green dot). Black dashed lines indicate κ/n = const. transport model. The sum in (7) is taken over all cells of the sur… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) A few example trajectories of neutral particles and their reactions. (b) List of reactions that are included in the simplified particle exhaust calculation. a) b) c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Computed quantities in the simplified particle exhaust calculation based on ht from figure 1 (b): (a) ionization source in the core gcore, (b) pumped particle flux gpump, and (c) incident flux of energetic particles gfast on the first wall and shields in W7-X. The background plasma in the core is set to ncore = 5 · 1019 m−3 and Tcore = 200 eV. Solid lines show the corresponding value in the EMC3-EIRENE ref… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Shape parameters (blue) for the horizontal and vertical targets (green) and pump gap (orange) of the island divertor in W7-X. These parameters are functions of the toroidal angle. Additional shape adjustments for the vertical target position (yellow) and pump gap position (magenta) are highlighted. (b) Heat load proxy for the parameterized divertor shape fitted to the current W7-X geometry using cubic … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Parameter scan for the peak heat load on the vertical target with shape adjustments (b0, σ). (b) Resulting heat load proxy for b0 = 10 cm and σ = 10 deg. a) b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Parameter scan of the pump gap position p0 and vertical target offset b0: (a) resulting pumped particle flux gpump, and (b) peak heat load on pump gap max qt|pump = P ∗ SOL · max ht|pump based on P ∗ SOL from the EMC3-EIRENE simulation. The (arbitrary) contour line qt| (limit) pump = 0.1 MW m−2 is shown in black. Colored dots mark the optimal configuration (maximal gpump) with upstream conditions (red) and… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Optimization progress for two scenarios: 1) where the vertical target itself remains fixed with offset parameters b0 = 2 cm, σ = 10 deg, φ0 = −9.5 deg (blue), and 2) where b0, σ and φ0 are additional shape coefficients to be optimized (orange). Reference values for maximal gpump are taken from the constrained region of figure 7 (green) and its subset at fixed b0 = 2 cm (black). (b) Optimal pump gap con… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The divertor in a magnetic confinement fusion reactor is an essential component for power dissipation and particle removal. The FIREFLY package for rapid evaluation of divertor designs is presented as an extension of the FLARE code for field line reconstruction from a flux tube mesh. First, divertor loads are approximated with a simplified heat transport model. Neutralized particles are then sampled from the resulting load distribution, and the EIRENE code is used to track molecules and atoms in a plasma background while accounting for dissociation, charge exchange and ionization. Particles are removed on pumping surfaces in order to estimate the exhaust efficiency for a given divertor geometry. Optimization of the divertor geometry for more efficient particle exhaust is explored by using W7-X as an example, and the sensitivity to model parameters for the plasma background in the proxy calculations is evaluated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents the FIREFLY package as an extension of the FLARE code for rapid divertor design evaluation in fusion devices. Divertor heat loads are approximated via a simplified heat transport model on a flux tube mesh; neutralized particles are sampled from this distribution and tracked with EIRENE in a fixed plasma background to compute exhaust efficiency via pumping surface removal. The workflow is demonstrated on W7-X divertor geometry variants with sensitivity analysis to background plasma parameters.

Significance. If the proxy heat-load and fixed-background approximations correctly rank relative exhaust efficiencies across geometries, FIREFLY would enable useful rapid screening and optimization of divertor shapes without repeated full transport runs. The method builds on established codes (FLARE, EIRENE) and includes parameter sensitivity, but the lack of quantitative benchmarks against self-consistent simulations or data currently limits its assessed impact for design decisions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results on W7-X optimization] The central claim that FIREFLY produces useful exhaust-efficiency estimates for geometry optimization rests on the simplified heat transport model and fixed plasma background preserving correct relative trends. No direct benchmark against self-consistent codes (e.g., SOLPS-ITER + EIRENE) or W7-X experimental data is provided to confirm ordering of exhaust efficiencies for different divertor variants; only parameter sensitivity is shown.
  2. [Methods: heat load approximation] The heat-load approximation step (prior to EIRENE sampling) is described as using a simplified transport model, yet no quantitative error metrics, comparison to full heat-flux calculations, or validation of the resulting load distribution against reference solutions are reported. This is load-bearing because the sampled particle distribution directly feeds the exhaust-efficiency calculation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the plasma background parameters and the definition of exhaust efficiency should be clarified with explicit equations or a table of symbols to improve reproducibility.
  2. [Results] Figure captions for the W7-X geometry variants and exhaust-efficiency plots would benefit from stating the exact parameter values used in the sensitivity study.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below, clarifying the intended scope of the FIREFLY approximations while acknowledging the value of additional validation. Revisions have been made to improve transparency on assumptions and limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results on W7-X optimization] The central claim that FIREFLY produces useful exhaust-efficiency estimates for geometry optimization rests on the simplified heat transport model and fixed plasma background preserving correct relative trends. No direct benchmark against self-consistent codes (e.g., SOLPS-ITER + EIRENE) or W7-X experimental data is provided to confirm ordering of exhaust efficiencies for different divertor variants; only parameter sensitivity is shown.

    Authors: We agree that direct benchmarks against self-consistent codes would strengthen confidence in the preservation of relative trends across geometries. The manuscript presents FIREFLY as a rapid proxy tool for initial screening rather than a replacement for full transport simulations; the W7-X example and parameter sensitivity study are intended to illustrate workflow and robustness under the stated approximations. Performing new SOLPS-ITER runs for multiple divertor variants exceeds the scope of this methods-focused paper. In revision we have added an explicit discussion of the conditions under which relative ordering is expected to hold (fixed background, neglect of geometry-induced plasma response) and have expanded the conclusions to state that full validation remains future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods: heat load approximation] The heat-load approximation step (prior to EIRENE sampling) is described as using a simplified transport model, yet no quantitative error metrics, comparison to full heat-flux calculations, or validation of the resulting load distribution against reference solutions are reported. This is load-bearing because the sampled particle distribution directly feeds the exhaust-efficiency calculation.

    Authors: The heat-load model extends the established FLARE flux-tube framework with a simplified conduction-convection balance; its purpose is to generate a plausible load distribution for subsequent neutral sampling rather than to reproduce absolute heat fluxes. We acknowledge that the original manuscript lacked quantitative error metrics or side-by-side comparisons. The revised version includes the governing equations of the proxy model, a clearer statement of its assumptions, and references to prior FLARE validations. New quantitative comparisons to full heat-flux solutions are not available from the present study and would require separate dedicated calculations. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct quantitative benchmarks of exhaust-efficiency ordering against self-consistent SOLPS-ITER + EIRENE simulations or W7-X experimental data for the tested divertor variants.
  • Quantitative error metrics and validation of the simplified heat-load distribution against reference full-transport solutions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; approximations rely on external codes without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper presents FIREFLY as an extension of the established FLARE code for field-line tracing, followed by a simplified heat-transport proxy feeding into the independent EIRENE Monte-Carlo neutral code on a fixed background. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that make any output quantity (heat-load distribution or exhaust efficiency) identical to an input by construction. The central workflow is a forward approximation whose validity rests on external benchmarks and parameter sensitivity studies rather than on any definitional loop or renamed fit. This is the expected non-circular case for a proxy-tool paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; free parameters are the plasma-background quantities whose sensitivity is evaluated, but no explicit list or values are given.

free parameters (1)
  • plasma background parameters
    Sensitivity of exhaust estimates to these parameters is explicitly evaluated, indicating they function as adjustable inputs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5450 in / 1090 out tokens · 38568 ms · 2026-05-10T15:15:39.533748+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Performance of different tungsten grades under transient thermal loads

    A. Loarte, B. Lipschultz, A. S. Kukushkin, G. F. Matthews, P. C. Stangeby, N. Asakura, G. F. Counsell, G. Federici, A. Kallenbach, K. Krieger, A. Mahdavi, V. Philipps, D. Reiter, J. Roth, J. Strachan, D. Whyte, R. Doerner, T. Eich, W. Fundamenski, A. Herrmann, M. Fenstermacher, P. Ghendrih, M. Groth, A. Kirschner, S. Konoshima, B. LaBombard, P. Lang, A. W...

    work page doi:10.1088/0029- 2007

  2. [2]

    Krieger, S

    K. Krieger, S. Brezinsek, J.W. Coenen, H. Frerichs, A. Kallenbach, A.W. Leonard, T. Loarer, S. Ratynskaia, N. Vianello, N. Asakura, M. Bernert, D. Carralero, R. Ding, D. Douai, T. Eich, Y. Gasparyan, A. Hakola, Y. Hatano, M. Jakubowski, M. Kobayashi, S. Krasheninnikov, S. Masuzaki, T. Nakano, R. Neu, R.A. Pitts, J. Rapp, K. Schmid, O. Schmitz, D. Tskhakay...

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/adaf42 2025

  3. [3]

    K¨ onig, P

    R. K¨ onig, P. Grigull, K. McCormick, Y. Feng, J. Kisslinger, A. Komori, S. Masuzaki, K. Matsuoka, T. Obiki, N. Ohyabu, H. Renner, F. Sardei, F. Wagner, and A. Werner. The divertor program in stellarators.Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion,44(2002) (11) 2365–2422

    2002

  4. [4]

    G. F. Matthews. Plasma detachment from divertor targets and limiters.J. Nucl. Mater.,220-222 (1995) 104–116. 10.1016/0022-3115(94)00450-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(94)00450-1 1995

  5. [5]

    S. I. Krasheninnikov and A. S. Kukushkin. Physics of ultimate detachment of a tokamak divertor plasma.J. Plasma Phys.,83(2017) (5) 155830501. 10.1017/s0022377817000654. FIREFLY: heat load and particle exhaust approximations for rapid evaluation of divertor designs17

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377817000654 2017

  6. [6]

    P. C. Stangeby. Basic physical processes and reduced models for plasma detachment.Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion,60(2018) 044022. 10.1088/1361-6587/aaacf6

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aaacf6 2018

  7. [7]

    Pacher, A.S

    H.D. Pacher, A.S. Kukushkin, G.W. Pacher, V. Kotov, R.A. Pitts, and D. Reiter. Impurity seeding in ITER DT plasmas in a carbon-free environment.J. Nucl. Mater.,463(2015) 591. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.104

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.104 2015

  8. [8]

    Pitts, X

    R.A. Pitts, X. Bonnin, F. Escourbiac, H. Frerichs, J.P. Gunn, T. Hirai, A.S. Kukushkin, E. Kaveeva, M.A. Miller, D. Moulton, V. Rozhansky, I. Senichenkov, E. Sytova, O. Schmitz, P.C. Stangeby, G. De Temmerman, I. Veselova, and S. Wiesen. Physics basis for the first ITER tungsten divertor.Nuclear Materials and Energy,20(2019) 100696. ISSN 2352-1791. https:...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nme.2019.100696 2019

  9. [9]

    Y. Feng, F. Sardei, J. Kisslinger, P. Grigull, K. McCormick, and D. Reiter. 3D Edge Modeling and Island Divertor Physics.Contrib. Plasma Phys.,44(2004) (1-3) 57–69. 10.1002/ctpp.200410009

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.200410009 2004

  10. [10]

    Frerichs, Y

    H. Frerichs, Y. Feng, X. Bonnin, R. A. Pitts, D. Reiter, and O. Schmitz. Volumetric recombination in EMC3-EIRENE: implementation, and first application to the pre-fusion power operation phase in ITER.Phys. Plasmas,28(2021) 102503. 10.1063/5.0062248

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0062248 2021

  11. [11]

    Validation of D–T fusion power prediction capability against 2021 JET D–T experiments

    Yuhe Feng, Detlev Reiter, and Heinke Frerichs. A novel method for treating mar in emc3- eirene, and first applications to w7-x.Nuclear Fusion, (2025). ISSN 1741-4326. 10.1088/1741- 4326/add27a

    work page doi:10.1088/1741- 2025

  12. [12]

    Review of magnetic islands from the divertor perspective and a simplified heat transport model for the island divertor.Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion,64 (2022) (12) 125012

    Y Feng and W7-X-team. Review of magnetic islands from the divertor perspective and a simplified heat transport model for the island divertor.Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion,64 (2022) (12) 125012. 10.1088/1361-6587/ac9ed9

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ac9ed9 2022

  13. [13]

    Looby, M

    T. Looby, M. Reinke, A. Wingen, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, T. Gray, D. Donovan, E. Unterberg, J. Klabacha, and M. Messineo. A software package for plasma-facing component analysis and design: The heat flux engineering analysis toolkit (heat).Fusion Science and Technology,78 (2022) (1) 10–27. ISSN 1943-7641. 10.1080/15361055.2021.1951532

    work page doi:10.1080/15361055.2021.1951532 2022

  14. [14]

    Frerichs

    H. Frerichs. FLARE: field line analysis and reconstruction for 3D boundary plasma modeling. Nuclear Fusion,64(2024) 106034. 10.1088/1741-4326/ad7303

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad7303 2024

  15. [15]

    Y. Feng, F. Sardei, and J. Kisslinger. A simple highly accurate field-line mapping technique for three-dimensional Monte Carlo modeling of plasma edge transport.Phys. Plasmas,12 (2005) (052505) 1–7. 10.1063/1.1888959

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1888959 2005

  16. [16]

    Magnetic mesh generation and field line reconstruction for scrape-off layer and divertor modeling in stellarators.Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, (2025)

    Heinke Frerichs, Dieter Boeyaert, Yuhe Feng, and Kelly Adriana Garcia. Magnetic mesh generation and field line reconstruction for scrape-off layer and divertor modeling in stellarators.Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, (2025). ISSN 1361-6587. 10.1088/1361-6587/adbb8c

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/adbb8c 2025

  17. [17]

    Destruction of magnetic surfaces near a separatrix of a stellarator attributed to perturbations of magnetic fields.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan,44(1978) (2) 637–642

    Yukihiro Tomita, Yasuyuki Nomura, Hiromu Momota, and Ryohei Itatani. Destruction of magnetic surfaces near a separatrix of a stellarator attributed to perturbations of magnetic fields.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan,44(1978) (2) 637–642. ISSN 1347-4073. 10.1143/JPSJ.44.637

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.44.637 1978

  18. [18]

    Y. Feng, J. Kisslinger, and F. Sardei. Formulation of a Monte Carlo model for edge plasma trans- port. In27th EPS Conference on Contr. Fusion and Plasma Phys., volume 24B, pages 1188–

  19. [19]

    https://info.fusion.ciemat.es/OCS/EPS2000/pdf/p3˙098.pdf

    Budapest, 12-16 June 2000. https://info.fusion.ciemat.es/OCS/EPS2000/pdf/p3˙098.pdf

    2000

  20. [20]

    Boeyaert, Y

    D. Boeyaert, Y. Feng, H. Frerichs, T. Kremeyer, D. Naujoks, Reimold F, O. Schmitz, V. Winters, Bozhenkov S, Fellinger J, V. Perseo, G. Schlisio, U. Wenzel, and W7-X team. Analysis of the neutral flows in the divertor region of Wendelstein 7-X under attached and detached conditions using EMC3-EIRENE.Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion,66(2024). 10.1088/1361-6587/ad0e22

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ad0e22 2024

  21. [21]

    Reiter, M

    D. Reiter, M. Baelmans, and P. Boerner. The EIRENE and B2-EIRENE codes.Fusion Science and Technology,47(2005) (2) 172. 10.13182/FST47-172

    work page doi:10.13182/fst47-172 2005

  22. [22]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg,

    Wolfgang Eckstein.Computer Simulation of Ion-Solid Interactions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,

  23. [23]

    10.1007/978-3-642-73513-4

    ISBN 9783642735134. 10.1007/978-3-642-73513-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-73513-4

  24. [24]

    R. K. Janev, K. Evans Jr., W. D. Langer, and D. E. Post Jr.Elementary Processes in Hydrogen- Helium Plasmas. Springer, 1987. 10.1007/978-3-642-71935-6. FIREFLY: heat load and particle exhaust approximations for rapid evaluation of divertor designs18

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-71935-6 1987

  25. [25]

    Greenland and D

    P.T. Greenland and D. Reiter. The role of Molecular Hydrogen in Plasma Recombination. Report J¨UL-3258, KFA-Juelich, 1996

    1996

  26. [26]

    Hydrogenic fast-ion diagnostic using Balmer-alpha light

    V. Kotov, D. Reiter, R. A. Pitts, S. Jachmich, A. Huber, D. P. Coster, and JET-EFDA contributors. Numerical modelling of high density JET divertor plasma with the SOLPS4.2 (B2-EIRENE) code.Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion,50(2008) 105012. 10.1088/0741- 3335/50/10/105012

    work page doi:10.1088/0741- 2008

  27. [27]

    Kennedy and R

    J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization.Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks,4(1995) 1942–1948. 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968

    work page doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 1995

  28. [28]

    Eberhart and J

    R. Eberhart and J. Kennedy. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory.Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, (1995) 39–43. 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215

    work page doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 1995

  29. [29]

    Shi and R

    Y. Shi and R. Eberhart. A modified particle swarm optimizer.IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360), (1998). 10.1109/ICEC.1998.699146

    work page doi:10.1109/icec.1998.699146 1998

  30. [30]

    Eberhart and Y

    R.C. Eberhart and Y. Shi. Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization.Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512),1(2000) 84–88. 10.1109/CEC.2000.870279

    work page doi:10.1109/cec.2000.870279 2000

  31. [31]

    Clerc and J

    M. Clerc and J. Kennedy. The particle swarm - explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space.IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation,6(2002) (1) 58–73. ISSN 1089-778X. 10.1109/4235.985692

    work page doi:10.1109/4235.985692 2002

  32. [32]

    The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection.Information Processing Letters,85(2003) (6) 317–325

    Ioan Cristian Trelea. The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection.Information Processing Letters,85(2003) (6) 317–325. ISSN 0020-0190. 10.1016/S0020-0190(02)00447-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0020-0190(02)00447-7 2003

  33. [33]

    Elsayed, Ruhul A

    Saber M. Elsayed, Ruhul A. Sarker, and Efren Mezura-Montes. Particle swarm optimizer for constrained optimization. In2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 2703–

  34. [34]

    10.1109/CEC.2013.6557896

    IEEE, June 2013. 10.1109/CEC.2013.6557896

    work page doi:10.1109/cec.2013.6557896 2013

  35. [35]

    Taxonomy for evaluating the site-specific applicability of one-dimensional ground response analysis

    Manoela Kohler, Marley M.B.R. Vellasco, and Ricardo Tanscheit. Pso+: A new particle swarm optimization algorithm for constrained problems.Applied Soft Computing,85(2019) 105865. ISSN 1568-4946. 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105865

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105865 2019