arxiv: 2604.11889 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

ALP production in Lepton Flavour Violating meson, tau and gauge boson decays

Federico Mescia, Lorenzo Calibbi, Marco Ardu, Marco Fedele

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords axion-like particleslepton flavour violationALP productionmeson decaystau decaysgauge boson decaysLFV signaturesdisplaced vertices

0 comments

The pith

Axion-like particles with lepton-flavor-violating couplings above the muon mass can be produced in meson, tau, and gauge boson decays and detected via their decay to electron-muon pairs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines axion-like particles that violate lepton flavor for masses above the muon threshold. In this range the usual bound from muon decay no longer applies and the ALP can decay to an electron and a muon, creating clean LFV signals with almost no Standard Model background. The authors calculate production rates in charged-meson decays, W-boson decays, Z-boson decays, quarkonium decays, and tau decays when third-generation couplings are present. They combine these rates with existing low-energy limits to project the reach of Belle II, STCF, NA62, SHiP, and future e+e- colliders. This opens a new experimental window for testing ALP interactions with charged leptons.

Core claim

In the mass regime m_a > m_μ, ALPs with LFV couplings are produced in charged-meson and W decays, neutral-current processes such as Z and quarkonium decays, and LFV τ decays. The subsequent prompt decay a → eμ yields striking LFV signatures with negligible SM backgrounds, making these channels a promising search avenue when combined with low-energy constraints and future collider and fixed-target sensitivities.

What carries the argument

LFV couplings of the ALP to charged leptons, enabling production in decays involving virtual muons followed by the prompt decay a → eμ.

If this is right

Future high-energy e+e- colliders can probe ALP couplings via Z and W decay channels.
Belle II and STCF can search in B-meson and tau decays for LFV ALP production.
NA62 can probe kaon decays to ALP with displaced eμ vertices.
SHiP beam-dump experiments can detect long-lived ALPs from proton collisions if lifetimes permit displaced vertices.
These searches test ALP-lepton interactions above the muon mass where previous constraints are weak.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Null results would strengthen bounds on LFV ALP parameters by orders of magnitude across a new mass window.
The displaced-vertex signature could be exploited to further suppress backgrounds in these experiments.
Signals in these channels could be cross-checked with other ALP searches such as diphoton or invisible decays to map the full coupling structure.
The approach could be extended to other LFV final states if additional couplings are present.

Load-bearing premise

The ALP is assumed to decay promptly to eμ pairs with negligible Standard Model backgrounds and that the LFV couplings permit observable production rates without additional model-dependent suppressions.

What would settle it

A null result in searches for eμ pairs with invariant mass equal to the ALP mass, or no displaced vertices, in the proposed meson, tau, or gauge-boson decay channels at Belle II or NA62 would disprove the predicted sensitivities.

read the original abstract

In this paper we study axion-like particles (ALPs) with lepton-flavour-violating (LFV) couplings in the mass regime above the muon threshold, $m_a>m_\mu$, where the strong bound from the exotic muon decay $\mu\to ea$ no longer apply and the decay channel $a\to e\mu$ becomes kinematically accessible. In this region, the ALP typically decays promptly, motivating new search strategies based on its production in decays involving virtual muons. We analyse charged-meson and $W$ decays, neutral-current processes such as $Z$ and quarkonium decays, and, when couplings to the third generation are present, LFV $\tau$ decays. The subsequent decay $a\to e\mu$ leads to striking LFV signatures with negligible Standard Model backgrounds. Combining these production modes with current low-energy constraints, we assess the sensitivity of future high-energy $e^+e^-$ colliders, flavour factories such as Belle II and STCF, fixed-target experiments such as NA62, and proton beam-dump facilities such as SHiP. Overall, our results identify LFV ALP production in meson, gauge-boson, quarkonium and $\tau$ decays (with displaced vertices) as a promising and largely unexplored avenue to test ALP interactions with charged leptons above the muon mass threshold.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper maps LFV ALP production in meson, tau, and gauge boson decays for masses above the muon threshold, with clean eμ signatures at future facilities.

read the letter

The core point is that ALPs with lepton-flavor-violating couplings become searchable in a new mass window once m_a exceeds m_μ, because the tight μ→ea bound drops away and the a→eμ channel opens up. The authors work through production in charged meson decays, W decays, Z and quarkonium neutral currents, and τ decays when third-generation couplings are present. They show that the subsequent eμ decay gives low-background LFV signatures, sometimes with displaced vertices, and then fold existing limits into sensitivity estimates for Belle II, STCF, NA62, SHiP, and high-energy e+e− colliders.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies axion-like particles (ALPs) with lepton-flavour-violating (LFV) couplings to charged leptons for masses m_a > m_μ. In this regime the decay a → eμ opens and the strong μ → e a bound is evaded. The authors compute production branching ratios in LFV decays of charged mesons, W bosons, Z bosons, quarkonia and τ leptons using an effective Lagrangian, then project the reach of future facilities (Belle II, STCF, NA62, SHiP, e⁺e⁻ colliders) for the clean LFV final states, including displaced-vertex signatures with negligible Standard Model backgrounds.

Significance. If the rate calculations and background assumptions hold, the work identifies a previously under-explored mass window and set of production channels for LFV ALPs. The multi-channel strategy and emphasis on displaced vertices provide concrete, falsifiable targets for upcoming experiments and could meaningfully extend existing constraints on ALP-lepton couplings above the muon threshold.

major comments (2)

[Sensitivity projections and discussion of backgrounds] The central sensitivity projections rest on the claim that a → eμ yields negligible SM backgrounds and observable rates after current LFV bounds are applied. The manuscript should explicitly tabulate or plot the surviving parameter space (e.g., the LFV coupling strengths versus m_a) after folding in all existing limits, so that the projected reach at NA62/SHiP and Belle II can be directly compared to the allowed region.
[LFV τ decays and displaced-vertex analysis] For the τ-decay channels (when third-generation couplings are present), the branching-ratio formulas assume the ALP is produced on-shell and decays promptly or displaced; the paper should quantify the lifetime range (cτ) for which the displaced-vertex selection remains efficient, citing the relevant decay-width expressions.

minor comments (2)

[Effective Lagrangian and notation] The notation for the LFV ALP-lepton couplings (g_{aℓ_i ℓ_j}) should be collected in a single table with explicit definitions and symmetry assumptions.
[Figures showing projected reaches] Several sensitivity plots would benefit from overlaying current experimental limits as shaded exclusion regions to make the improvement from future facilities immediately visible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive suggestions for minor revision. We address each major comment below and have incorporated changes to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Sensitivity projections and discussion of backgrounds] The central sensitivity projections rest on the claim that a → eμ yields negligible SM backgrounds and observable rates after current LFV bounds are applied. The manuscript should explicitly tabulate or plot the surviving parameter space (e.g., the LFV coupling strengths versus m_a) after folding in all existing limits, so that the projected reach at NA62/SHiP and Belle II can be directly compared to the allowed region.

Authors: We agree that an explicit display of the surviving parameter space would improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we have added a new figure showing the LFV coupling strength versus ALP mass after all current low-energy constraints are applied, with the projected sensitivities of NA62, SHiP, Belle II and other facilities overlaid. The text has been updated to reference this figure and to emphasize that the projections target regions still allowed by existing bounds. revision: yes
Referee: [LFV τ decays and displaced-vertex analysis] For the τ-decay channels (when third-generation couplings are present), the branching-ratio formulas assume the ALP is produced on-shell and decays promptly or displaced; the paper should quantify the lifetime range (cτ) for which the displaced-vertex selection remains efficient, citing the relevant decay-width expressions.

Authors: We appreciate this request for additional detail. In the revised version we have added a paragraph in the τ-decay section that quantifies the proper lifetime cτ range (roughly 0.1 mm to a few meters) for which displaced-vertex selections remain efficient at Belle II and STCF. This discussion cites the decay-width formula for a → eμ already derived in the manuscript and explains how the assumed efficiencies correspond to this lifetime window. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript computes ALP production rates and branching ratios in LFV channels from an effective Lagrangian with explicit LFV couplings, then projects experimental sensitivities by folding in existing bounds. All steps are standard EFT derivations with no self-definitional reductions, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations that close the argument. The central claims rest on explicit rate formulas and kinematic thresholds that are independent of the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits detail; central claim relies on standard ALP effective theory and free LFV coupling parameters.

free parameters (1)

LFV ALP-lepton couplings
Coupling strengths to different lepton flavors are free parameters that determine production and decay rates.

axioms (1)

domain assumption ALPs described by effective field theory below a high scale
Standard assumption for ALP phenomenology in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1077 out tokens · 37742 ms · 2026-05-10T15:28:43.547482+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Crossing into the $m_a > f_a$ Region for Leptophilic ALPs
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Leptophilic ALPs with m_a > f_a can explain the electron anomalous magnetic moment tension over a large parameter space and are testable via μ→e conversion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

[1]

R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

1977
[2]

Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226

1978
[3]

Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

1978
[4]

Chikashige, R

Y. Chikashige, R. N. Mohapatra and R. Peccei,Are There Real Goldstone Bosons Associated with Broken Lepton Number?,Phys. Lett. B98(1981) 265–268

1981
[5]

Gelmini and M

G. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli,Left-Handed Neutrino Mass Scale and Spontaneously Broken Lepton Number,Phys. Lett. B99(1981) 411–415

1981
[6]

H. M. Georgi, S. L. Glashow and S. Nussinov,Unconventional Model of Neutrino Masses, Nucl. Phys. B193(1981) 297–316

1981
[7]

Davidson and K

A. Davidson and K. C. Wali,Minimal Flavor Unification via Multigenerational Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 11

1982
[8]

Wilczek,Axions and Family Symmetry Breaking,Phys

F. Wilczek,Axions and Family Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1549–1552

1982
[9]

D. B. Reiss,Can the Family Group Be a Global Symmetry?,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 217–220

1982
[10]

Davidson, V

A. Davidson, V. P. Nair and K. C. Wali,Peccei-Quinn Symmetry as Flavor Symmetry and Grand Unification,Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 1504

1984
[11]

Chang and G

D. Chang and G. Senjanovic,On Axion and Familons,Phys. Lett. B188(1987) 231. 29

1987
[12]

Z. G. Berezhiani and M. Y. Khlopov,Physical and astrophysical consequences of breaking of the symmetry of families. (In Russian),Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.51(1990) 935–942

1990
[13]

Z. G. Berezhiani and M. Y. Khlopov,The Theory of broken gauge symmetry of families. (In Russian),Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.51(1990) 739–746

1990
[14]

Y. Ema, K. Hamaguchi, T. Moroi and K. Nakayama,Flaxion: a minimal extension to solve puzzles in the standard model,JHEP01(2017) 096, [1612.05492]

work page arXiv 2017
[15]

Calibbi, F

L. Calibbi, F. Goertz, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan,Minimal axion model from flavor,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 095009, [1612.08040]

work page arXiv 2017
[16]

Preskill, M

J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B 120(1983) 127–132

1983
[17]

L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B 120(1983) 133–136

1983
[18]

Dine and W

M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137–141

1983
[19]

Arias, D

P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo and A. Ringwald,WISPy Cold Dark Matter,JCAP06(2012) 013, [1201.5902]

work page arXiv 2012
[20]

Dark Matter through the Axion Portal,

Y. Nomura and J. Thaler,Dark Matter through the Axion Portal,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 075008, [0810.5397]

work page arXiv 2009
[21]

Essig et al.,Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles, inSnowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi, 10, 2013.1311.0029

R. Essig et al.,Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles, inSnowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi, 10, 2013.1311.0029

work page arXiv 2013
[22]

Bharucha, F

A. Bharucha, F. Brümmer, N. Desai and S. Mutzel,Axion-like particles as mediators for dark matter: beyond freeze-out,JHEP02(2023) 141, [2209.03932]

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

D. K. Ghosh, A. Ghoshal and S. Jeesun,Axion-like particle (ALP) portal freeze-in dark matter confronting ALP search experiments,JHEP01(2024) 026, [2305.09188]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

P. J. Fitzpatrick, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, R. Ovadia and Y. Soreq,Dark matter through the axion-gluon portal,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 075003, [2306.03128]

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

Armando, P

G. Armando, P. Panci, J. Weiss and R. Ziegler,Leptonic ALP portal to the dark sector, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 055029, [2310.05827]

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

D’Eramo and T

F. D’Eramo and T. Sassi,Axion portal to scalar Dark Matter: unveiling stabilizing symmetry footprints,JHEP07(2025) 031, [2502.19491]

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Calibbi, T

L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee and M. A. Schmidt,Is dark matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯excess at Belle II?,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 075020, [2502.04900]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Axion-Like Electrophilic Portal for Pion Dark Matter

V. Fiorentino, J.-H. Guo, G. Landini and F. Mescia,Axion-Like Electrophilic Portal for Pion Dark Matter,2602.02678

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[29]

de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,arXiv:2511.03883

J. de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,2511.03883

work page arXiv 2026
[30]

Ai et al., Chin

X. Ai et al.,New physics search at the CEPC: a general perspective,Chin. Phys. C49 (2025) 123108, [2505.24810]. [31]FCCcollaboration, A. Abada et al.,HE-LHC: The High-Energy Large Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 4,Eur. Phys. J. ST228(2019) 1109–1382

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Dainese, M

A. Dainese, M. Mangano, A. B. Meyer, A. Nisati, G. Salam and M. A. Vesterinen, eds., Report on the Physics at the HL-LHC,and Perspectives for the HE-LHC, vol. 7/2019 of CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019, 10.23731/CYRM-2019-007. [33]FCCcollaboration, M. Benedikt et al.,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume...

work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2019-007 2019
[32]

Alimena et al.,Feebly-Interacting Particles: FIPs at LHCb — Workshop Report 2025 Edition, inLHCb FIP Physics Workshop 2025, 10, 2025.2510.05257

J. Alimena et al.,Feebly-Interacting Particles: FIPs at LHCb — Workshop Report 2025 Edition, inLHCb FIP Physics Workshop 2025, 10, 2025.2510.05257

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Neutrino Lines from Majoron Dark Matter

C. Garcia-Cely and J. Heeck,Neutrino Lines from Majoron Dark Matter,JHEP05(2017) 102, [1701.07209]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[34]

Heeck and H

J. Heeck and H. H. Patel,Majoron at two loops,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 095015, [1909.02029]

work page arXiv 2019
[35]

Calibbi, D

L. Calibbi, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan,Looking forward to lepton-flavor-violating ALPs,JHEP09(2021) 173, [2006.04795]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

Phenomenology of Non-Abelian Gauge and Goldstone Bosons in a U(2) Flavor Model

L. Calibbi and J. Yi,Phenomenology of Non-Abelian Gauge and Goldstone Bosons in a U(2) Flavor Model,2511.10468

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[37]

R. H. Bernstein and P. S. Cooper,Charged Lepton Flavor Violation: An Experimenter’s Guide,Phys. Rept.532(2013) 27–64, [1307.5787]

work page arXiv 2013
[38]

Calibbi and G

L. Calibbi and G. Signorelli,Charged Lepton Flavour Violation: An Experimental and Theoretical Introduction,Riv. Nuovo Cim.41(2018) 71–174, [1709.00294]

work page arXiv 2018
[39]

Ardu and G

M. Ardu and G. Pezzullo,Introduction to Charged Lepton Flavor Violation,Universe8 (2022) 299, [2204.08220]

work page arXiv 2022
[40]

Davidson, B

S. Davidson, B. Echenard, R. H. Bernstein, J. Heeck and D. G. Hitlin,Charged Lepton Flavor Violation,2209.00142

work page arXiv
[41]

Echenard, R

B. Echenard, R. Essig and Y.-M. Zhong,Projections for Dark Photon Searches at Mu3e, JHEP01(2015) 113, [1411.1770]

work page arXiv 2015
[42]

Heeck and W

J. Heeck and W. Rodejohann,Lepton flavor violation with displaced vertices,Phys. Lett. B 776(2018) 385–390, [1710.02062]

work page arXiv 2018
[43]

Hostert, T

M. Hostert, T. Menzo, M. Pospelov and J. Zupan,New physics in multi-electron muon decays,JHEP10(2023) 006, [2306.15631]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

Knapen, K

S. Knapen, K. Langhoff, T. Opferkuch and D. Redigolo,Angling for insights: illuminating light new physics at Mu3e through angular correlations,JHEP07(2024) 194, [2311.17913]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

P. J. Fox, M. Hostert, T. Menzo, M. Pospelov and J. Zupan,Muon-induced baryon number violation,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 075015, [2407.03450]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

Knapen, T

S. Knapen, T. Opferkuch, D. Redigolo and M. Tammaro,Displaced searches for Axion-Like Particles and Heavy Neutral Leptons at Mu3e,JHEP06(2025) 189, [2410.13941]

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

Garcia i Tormo, D

X. Garcia i Tormo, D. Bryman, A. Czarnecki and M. Dowling,Bounds on majoron emission from muon to electron conversion experiments,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 113010, [1110.2874]

work page arXiv 2011
[48]

Uesaka,Model identification inµ− →e − conversion with invisible boson emission using muonic atoms,Phys

Y. Uesaka,Model identification inµ− →e − conversion with invisible boson emission using muonic atoms,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 095007, [2005.07894]

work page arXiv 2020
[49]

Panci, D

P. Panci, D. Redigolo, T. Schwetz and R. Ziegler,Axion dark matter from lepton flavor-violating decays,Phys. Lett. B841(2023) 137919, [2209.03371]

work page arXiv 2023
[50]

Y. Jho, S. Knapen and D. Redigolo,Lepton-flavor violating axions at MEG II,JHEP10 (2022) 029, [2203.11222]

work page arXiv 2022
[51]

T. Xing, C. Wu, H. Miao, H.-B. Li, W. Li, Y. Yuan et al.,Search for Majoron at the COMET experiment*,Chin. Phys. C47(2023) 013108, [2209.12802]

work page arXiv 2023
[52]

R. J. Hill, R. Plestid and J. Zupan,Searching for new physics atµ→e facilities withµ+ and π+ decays at rest,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 035025, [2310.00043]

work page arXiv 2024
[53]

Knapen, K

S. Knapen, K. Langhoff, T. Opferkuch and D. Redigolo,A robust search for lepton flavour violating axions at Mu3e,JHEP07(2025) 243, [2311.17915]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Bigaran, P

I. Bigaran, P. J. Fox, Y. Gouttenoire, R. Harnik, G. Krnjaic, T. Menzo et al.,Direct Detection of Ultralight Dark Matter via Charged Lepton Flavor Violation,2503.07722. 31

work page arXiv
[55]

M. Endo, S. Iguro and T. Kitahara,Probingeµflavor-violating ALP at Belle II,JHEP06 (2020) 040, [2002.05948]

work page arXiv 2020
[56]

Cornella, P

C. Cornella, P. Paradisi and O. Sumensari,Hunting for ALPs with Lepton Flavor Violation, JHEP01(2020) 158, [1911.06279]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

Bauer, M

M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm,Flavor probes of axion-like particles,JHEP09(2022) 056, [2110.10698]

work page arXiv 2022
[58]

Calibbi, T

L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee and Y. Yang,Probing ALP lepton flavor violation at µTRISTAN,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115009, [2406.13234]

work page arXiv 2024
[59]

Zhang, Y

Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang and Z. S. Wang,Same-sign dimuon probe of charged lepton flavor violation at electron-photon colliders,2603.26044

work page arXiv
[60]

Li and Z

Y. Li and Z. Liu,Supernova constraints on lepton flavor violating axions,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 055039, [2501.12075]

work page arXiv 2026
[61]

Huang and Z

Z.-M. Huang and Z. Liu,Low-energy supernova constraints on lepton flavor violating axions,JHEP10(2025) 024, [2506.16922]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Huang, C

Z.-M. Huang, C. Li and Z. Liu,Refined Low-Energy Supernova Constraints on Lepton Flavor Violating Axions,2510.22523. [66]MEG IIcollaboration, K. Afanaciev et al.,New limit on theµ + →e +γdecay with the MEG II experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1177, [2504.15711]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Altmannshofer, J

W. Altmannshofer, J. A. Dror and S. Gori,New Opportunities for Detecting Axion-Lepton Interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 241801, [2209.00665]. [68]NA62collaboration, E. Cortina Gil et al.,The Beam and detector of the NA62 experiment at CERN,JINST12(2017) P05025, [1703.08501]. [69]SHiP, HI-ECN3 Project Teamcollaboration, R. Albanese et al.,SHiP experim...

work page arXiv 2023
[64]

Achasovet al., Front

M. Achasov et al.,STCF conceptual design report (Volume 1): Physics & detector,Front. Phys. (Beijing)19(2024) 14701, [2303.15790]. [71]CEPC Study Groupcollaboration, W. Abdallah et al.,CEPC Technical Design Report: Accelerator,Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods8(2024) 1–1105, [2312.14363]. [72]Belle-IIcollaboration, W. Altmannshofer et al.,The Belle II Phys...

work page arXiv 2024
[65]

Eberhart, M

A. Eberhart, M. Fedele, F. Kahlhoefer, E. Ravensburg and R. Ziegler,Leptophilic ALPs in laboratory experiments,JHEP12(2025) 055, [2504.05873]

work page arXiv 2025
[66]

Greljo, A

A. Greljo, A. Palavrić, M. Tunja and J. Zupan,Expanding the Landscape of Exotic Muon Decays,2510.08674. [75]Belle, Belle-IIcollaboration, I. Adachi et al.,Search for Pcs(4459) and Pcs(4338) in Upsilon(1S,2S) inclusive decays at Belle,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 041901, [2502.09951]. [76]BaBarcollaboration, J. P. Lees et al.,Search for Charged Lepton Flavor ...

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

Y. Ema, P. J. Fox, M. Hostert, T. Menzo, M. Pospelov, A. Ray et al.,Long-lived axionlike particles from tau decays,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 115028, [2507.15271]. [78]Belle-IIcollaboration, I. Adachi et al.,Search for the lepton-flavor-violatingτ − →e ∓ℓ±ℓ∓ decays at Belle II,JHEP12(2025) 169, [2507.18236]

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

S. Chen, M. Sun and J. Tang,Muon beams towards muonium physics: progress and prospects,2601.15818

work page arXiv
[69]

Willmann et al.,New bounds from searching for muonium to anti-muonium conversion, Phys

L. Willmann et al.,New bounds from searching for muonium to anti-muonium conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 49–52, [hep-ex/9807011]

work page arXiv 1999
[70]

Bai et al.,Conceptual design of the muonium-to-antimuonium conversion experiment (MACE),Nucl

A.-Y. Bai et al.,Conceptual design of the muonium-to-antimuonium conversion experiment (MACE),Nucl. Sci. Tech.37(2026) 57, [2410.18817]. 32

work page arXiv 2026
[71]

Kuno and Y

Y. Kuno and Y. Okada,Muon decay and physics beyond the standard model,Rev. Mod. Phys.73(2001) 151–202, [hep-ph/9909265]. [83]Mu3ecollaboration, K. Arndt et al.,Technical design of the phase I Mu3e experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1014(2021) 165679, [2009.11690]. [84]COMETcollaboration, M. Moritsu,Search for Muon-to-Electron Conversion with the COMET Expe...

work page arXiv 2001
[72]

Kitano, M

R. Kitano, M. Koike and Y. Okada,Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon electron conversion rate for various nuclei,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 096002, [hep-ph/0203110]. [86]COMETcollaboration, Y. Kuno,A search for muon-to-electron conversion at J-PARC: The COMET experiment,PTEP2013(2013) 022C01. [87]Mu2ecollaboration, L. Bartoszek et al.,Mu2e Tech...

work page arXiv 2002
[73]

Ai et al.,Flavor physics at the CEPC: a general perspective,Chin

X. Ai et al.,Flavor physics at the CEPC: a general perspective,Chin. Phys.49(2025) 103003, [2412.19743]

work page arXiv 2025
[74]

Blondel and P

A. Blondel and P. Janot,FCC-ee overview: new opportunities create new challenges,Eur. Phys. J. Plus137(2022) 92, [2106.13885]

work page arXiv 2022
[75]

Maltoni and T

F. Maltoni and T. Stelzer,MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph,JHEP 02(2003) 027, [hep-ph/0208156]

work page arXiv 2003
[76]

MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond

J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer,MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond,JHEP06(2011) 128, [1106.0522]. [92]FCCcollaboration, M. Benedikt et al.,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 2, Accelerators, Technical Infrastructure and Safety,2505.00274

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[77]

Dam,Tau-lepton Physics at the FCC-ee circular e+e− Collider,SciPost Phys

M. Dam,Tau-lepton Physics at the FCC-ee circular e+e− Collider,SciPost Phys. Proc.1 (2019) 041, [1811.09408]. [94]DELPHES 3collaboration, J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens et al.,DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment,JHEP02(2014) 057, [1307.6346]

work page arXiv 2019
[78]

Hayasaka et al.,Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced Tau+Tau- Pairs,Phys

K. Hayasaka et al.,Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced Tau+Tau- Pairs,Phys. Lett. B687(2010) 139–143, [1001.3221]. [96]Belle-IIcollaboration, I. Adachi et al.,Search for Lepton-Flavor-ViolatingτDecays to a Lepton and an Invisible Boson at Belle II,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 181803, [2212.03634]. [97]Be...

work page arXiv 2010
[79]

Banerjee et al.,Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Charged lepton flavor violation in the tau sector,2203.14919

S. Banerjee et al.,Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Charged lepton flavor violation in the tau sector,2203.14919

work page arXiv 2021
[80]

Bician,Search for Lepton Number and Flavour Violation inK+ andπ 0 Decays,Nucl

L. Bician,Search for Lepton Number and Flavour Violation inK+ andπ 0 Decays,Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.318-323(2022) 170–172. [100]SHiPcollaboration, R. e. a. Albanese,BDF/SHiP Annual Report 2025, tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2025

2022

Showing first 80 references.