pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11931 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Light-Matter-Coupling formalism for magnons: probing quantum geometry with light

Ying Shing Liu (1) , Emil Vi\~nas Bostr\"om (2) , Michael A. Sentef (3 , 2) , Silvia Viola Kusminskiy (1 , 4) ((1) Institute for Theoretical Solid State Physics , RWTH Aachen University , Aachen
show 12 more authors
Germany (2) Max Planck Institute for the Structure Dynamics of Matter Center for Free Electron Laser Science Hamburg (3) Institute for Theoretical Physics Bremen Center for Computational Materials Science University of Bremen Bremen (4) Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light Erlangen Germany)
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnonsBerry curvatureRaman circular dichroismlight-matter couplingquantum geometrytopological magnonsCrI3Fleury-Loudon vertex
0
0 comments X

The pith

A light-matter coupling expansion of the effective magnon Hamiltonian directly yields the Fleury-Loudon Raman vertex and links Raman circular dichroism to magnon Berry curvature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that under broad conditions the Raman vertex for magnons emerges from expanding the effective magnon Hamiltonian in powers of the light-matter interaction, without needing a full microscopic treatment of virtual electronic processes. This produces an explicit analytical relation between the Raman circular dichroism signal and the Berry curvature carried by magnon bands. A reader would care because magnons are electrically neutral and their quantum geometry has been difficult to access experimentally; the new route offers a simpler optical handle on topological magnetic excitations. The formalism is applied to monolayer CrI3, where it predicts finite-temperature features in the dichroism that trace the magnon topology. These results point to a general method for designing quantum-geometry-sensitive probes in magnonic systems.

Core claim

Under broad conditions, the Fleury-Loudon Raman vertex can be obtained directly from a light-matter coupling expansion of the effective magnon Hamiltonian, bypassing the conventional microscopic derivation based on virtual electronic processes. This yields an analytical connection between the RCD and the Berry curvature of magnon bands. Applied to monolayer CrI3, the theory predicts finite temperature signatures of topological magnons in the RCD.

What carries the argument

The light-matter coupling expansion of the effective magnon Hamiltonian, which reproduces the Fleury-Loudon Raman vertex and furnishes the direct link to magnon Berry curvature.

If this is right

  • Raman circular dichroism becomes a direct experimental probe of magnon Berry curvature in topological magnonic systems.
  • Finite-temperature signatures of topological magnons appear in the RCD of monolayer CrI3.
  • The Raman response for magnons can be derived without explicit microscopic electronic calculations under the stated conditions.
  • A general route opens for quantum-geometry-sensitive optical probes in magnonic systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same expansion technique could be tested on other charge-neutral collective modes such as phonons or skyrmions to extract their geometric properties.
  • Experiments that independently map magnon Berry curvature, for example via neutron scattering or thermal transport, could be combined with RCD data to check the predicted relation.
  • The formalism may simplify modeling of light-induced magnon dynamics in heterostructures where full electronic structure calculations are prohibitive.

Load-bearing premise

The light-matter coupling expansion of the effective magnon Hamiltonian accurately reproduces the Raman vertex without needing the full microscopic electronic details.

What would settle it

A measurement of the temperature-dependent Raman circular dichroism spectrum in monolayer CrI3 that either matches or deviates from the finite-temperature signatures calculated from the magnon Berry curvature would confirm or refute the claimed connection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11931 by 2), (2) Max Planck Institute for the Structure, (3) Institute for Theoretical Physics, 4) ((1) Institute for Theoretical Solid State Physics, (4) Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Aachen, Bremen, Bremen Center for Computational Materials Science, Center for Free Electron Laser Science, Dynamics of Matter, Emil Vi\~nas Bostr\"om (2), Erlangen, Germany, Germany), Hamburg, Michael A. Sentef (3, RWTH Aachen University, Silvia Viola Kusminskiy (1, University of Bremen, Ying Shing Liu (1).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Setup: incident circularly polarized light is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Thermal Raman circular dichroism as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nontrivial quantum geometry is a key feature of the wavefunctions of collective magnetic excitations in topological systems, but accessing it experimentally remains an open challenge. While Raman circular dichroism (RCD) has emerged as a promising probe, the fundamental link between the RCD and magnon quantum geometry has remained unsettled, and complicated by the fact that magnons are charge neutral. Here, we identify when and why this link exists. We show that, under broad conditions, the Fleury-Loudon Raman vertex can be obtained directly from a light-matter coupling expansion of the effective magnon Hamiltonian, bypassing the conventional microscopic derivation based on virtual electronic processes. This yields an analytical connection between the RCD and the Berry curvature of magnon bands. Applied to monolayer CrI\textsubscript{3}, our theory predicts finite temperature signatures of topological magnons in the RCD. These results establish a general route to quantum-geometry sensitive optical probes in magnonic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a light-matter coupling formalism for magnons in which the Fleury-Loudon Raman vertex is obtained by expanding the effective magnon Hamiltonian to second order in the vector potential A. This bypasses the conventional microscopic derivation based on virtual electronic processes and yields an analytical relation between Raman circular dichroism (RCD) and the Berry curvature of magnon bands. The approach is applied to monolayer CrI3, where it predicts finite-temperature signatures of topological magnons in the RCD.

Significance. If the central equivalence holds, the work supplies a general, effective-model route to quantum-geometry-sensitive optical probes in magnonic systems. The direct analytical link to Berry curvature and the concrete predictions for CrI3 are potentially useful for experiments on topological magnons. The formalism also offers a parameter-free connection within the low-energy subspace once the effective Hamiltonian is given.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and main derivation (likely §2–3)] The central claim that the second-order expansion of the effective magnon Hamiltonian in A reproduces the Fleury-Loudon vertex (and thereby the RCD–Berry-curvature link) rests on the assumption that all relevant virtual charge-excitation contributions are already encoded in the magnon parameters. The manuscript does not supply an explicit projection argument or a counter-example check showing that residual interband A-dependent terms vanish under the stated 'broad conditions.' This equivalence is load-bearing for the analytical connection asserted in the abstract.
  2. [Application section (likely §4)] In the application to monolayer CrI3, the finite-temperature RCD signatures are presented as direct consequences of the topological magnon bands. It is not shown how the temperature dependence enters the effective Hamiltonian parameters or whether thermal fluctuations of the magnon Berry curvature are included; this affects the quantitative reliability of the predicted signatures.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the derivation holds 'under broad conditions' but does not enumerate those conditions; a concise list or reference to the relevant assumptions in the main text would improve clarity.
  2. [Derivation section] Notation for the Raman vertex and the light-matter expansion should be cross-referenced explicitly between the effective-Hamiltonian derivation and the conventional Fleury-Loudon expression to facilitate comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and positive evaluation of our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and main derivation (likely §2–3)] The central claim that the second-order expansion of the effective magnon Hamiltonian in A reproduces the Fleury-Loudon vertex (and thereby the RCD–Berry-curvature link) rests on the assumption that all relevant virtual charge-excitation contributions are already encoded in the magnon parameters. The manuscript does not supply an explicit projection argument or a counter-example check showing that residual interband A-dependent terms vanish under the stated 'broad conditions.' This equivalence is load-bearing for the analytical connection asserted in the abstract.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit derivation of the projection would enhance the rigor of the presentation. The effective magnon Hamiltonian is obtained by integrating out the electronic degrees of freedom, and the light-matter coupling is introduced via the vector potential in the underlying electronic Hamiltonian before projection. Under the broad conditions (separation of energy scales between charge excitations and magnons, and restriction to the low-energy subspace), the second-order expansion in A within the magnon manifold reproduces the Fleury-Loudon form because higher-order virtual processes are already absorbed into the effective parameters. In the revised version, we will include a dedicated subsection or appendix providing the projection argument and a brief counter-example check for a simple two-band model to demonstrate the vanishing of residual terms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application section (likely §4)] In the application to monolayer CrI3, the finite-temperature RCD signatures are presented as direct consequences of the topological magnon bands. It is not shown how the temperature dependence enters the effective Hamiltonian parameters or whether thermal fluctuations of the magnon Berry curvature are included; this affects the quantitative reliability of the predicted signatures.

    Authors: The temperature dependence in the RCD calculation arises primarily from the thermal occupation factors in the magnon response function, computed using the Bose distribution at finite temperature while keeping the magnon Hamiltonian parameters fixed at their zero-temperature values (as obtained from ab initio or experimental fits). This captures the leading effect of thermal magnon population on the RCD signal from topological bands. We agree that a more complete treatment would involve temperature-dependent renormalization of the Hamiltonian parameters (e.g., via magnon-magnon interactions or spin-wave theory at finite T) and possible averaging over thermal fluctuations in the Berry curvature. In the revision, we will add a paragraph clarifying the approximation used and discussing its limitations for quantitative predictions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation of Raman vertex from light-matter expansion stands independently

full rationale

The paper presents a derivation in which the Fleury-Loudon Raman vertex is obtained directly from a light-matter coupling expansion of the effective magnon Hamiltonian under broad conditions, yielding an analytical connection to magnon Berry curvature. No quoted equations or steps in the abstract reduce the claimed result to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The central claim is framed as bypassing conventional microscopic routes via an explicit expansion, with the result applied to CrI3 for finite-temperature signatures. This constitutes a self-contained derivation chain without the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5579 in / 1106 out tokens · 34142 ms · 2026-05-10T14:53:51.096981+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Loudon, The Raman effect in crys- tals, Advances in Physics13, 423 (1964), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018736400101051

    R. Loudon, The Raman effect in crys- tals, Advances in Physics13, 423 (1964), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018736400101051

    work page doi:10.1080/00018736400101051 1964

  2. [2]

    T. P. Devereaux and R. Hackl, Inelastic light scatter- ing from correlated electrons, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 175 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Olivier, and D

    H.Li, Q.Zhang, C.C.R.Yap, B.K.Tay, T.H.T.Edwin, A. Olivier, and D. Baillargeat, From bulk to monolayer MoS2: Evolution of raman scattering, Advanced Func- tional Materials22, 1385 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Weber and R

    W. Weber and R. Merlin,Raman Scattering in Materials Science, Springer Series in Materials Science (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Zhang, X.-F

    X. Zhang, X.-F. Qiao, W. Shi, J.-B. Wu, D.-S. Jiang, and P.-H. Tan, Phonon and raman scattering of two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides from mono- layer, multilayer to bulk material, Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 2757 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Smith and G

    E. Smith and G. Dent,Modern Raman Spectroscopy: A Practical Approach(Wiley, 2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    J. Cui, E. V. Boström, M. Ozerov, F. Wu, Q. Jiang, J.-H. Chu, C. Li, F. Liu, X. Xu, A. Rubio, and Q. Zhang, Chirality selective magnon-phonon hybridiza- tion and magnon-induced chiral phonons in a lay- eredzigzagantiferromagnet,NatureCommunications14, 10.1038/s41467-023-39123-y (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39123-y 2023

  8. [8]

    Kumawat, S

    R. Kumawat, S. Farswan, S. Kaur, S. Bhatia, and K. Sen, Potential of raman scattering in probing magnetic exci- tations and their coupling to lattice dynamics, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 493001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    R. J. Elliott and M. F. Thorpe, The effects of magnon- magnon interaction on the two-magnon spectra of anti- ferromagnets, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 2, 1630 (1969)

    work page 1969

  10. [10]

    M. G. Cottam, Theory of two-magnon raman scatter- ing in antiferromagnets at finite temperatures, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics5, 1461 (1972)

    work page 1972

  11. [11]

    D. J. Lockwood and M. G. Cottam, Light scattering from magnons inmnf 2, Phys. Rev. B35, 1973 (1987)

    work page 1973

  12. [12]

    Lockwood, M

    D. Lockwood, M. Cottam, and J. Baskey, One- and two- magnon excitations in nio, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials104-107, 1053 (1992), proceedings 6 of the International Conference on Magnetism, Part II

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    D. J. Lockwood and M. G. Cottam, Magnetooptic cou- pling coefficients for one- and two-magnon raman scat- tering in rutile-structure antiferromagnetsFeF2,MnF 2, CoF2, andNiF 2, Low Temperature Physics38, 549 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Knolle, G.-W

    J. Knolle, G.-W. Chern, D. L. Kovrizhin, R. Moessner, and N. B. Perkins, Raman scattering signatures of kitaev spin liquids inA2IrO3 iridates withA= Naor Li, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 187201 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Yamamoto and T

    S. Yamamoto and T. Kimura, Raman scattering po- larization and single spinon identification in two- dimensional Kitaev quantum spin liquids, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan89, 063701 (2020), https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.89.063701

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.89.063701 2020

  16. [16]

    Y. Choi, S. Lee, J.-H. Lee, S. Lee, M.-J. Seong, and K.-Y. Choi, Bosonic spinons in anisotropic triangular antiferro- magnets, Nature Communications12, 6453 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Sahasrabudhe, D

    A. Sahasrabudhe, D. A. S. Kaib, S. Reschke, R. Ger- man, T. C. Koethe, J. Buhot, D. Kamenskyi, C. Hickey, P. Becker, V. Tsurkan, A. Loidl, S. H. Do, K. Y. Choi, M. Grüninger, S. M. Winter, Z. Wang, R. Valentí, and P. H. M. van Loosdrecht, High-field quantum disordered state inα−RuCl 3: Spin flips, bound states, and multi- particle continuum, Phys. Rev. B1...

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Trebst and C

    S. Trebst and C. Hickey, Kitaev materials, Physics Re- ports950, 1 (2022), kitaev materials

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Calderon Filho, P

    C. Calderon Filho, P. Gomes, A. García-Flores, G. Bar- beris, and E. Granado, Two-magnon raman scattering in limnpo4, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 377, 430 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Rigitano, D

    D. Rigitano, D. Vaknin, G. E. Barberis, and E. Granado, Raman scattering from one and two magnons in magne- toelectriclinipo 4, Phys. Rev. B101, 024417 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Ghosh, C

    S. Ghosh, C. Lygouras, Z. Feng, M. Fu, S. Nakatsuji, and N. Drichko, Raman spectroscopic evidence for linearly dispersed nodes and magnetic ordering in the topologi- cal semimetalV 1/3NbS2 (2025), arXiv:2504.04590 [cond- mat] version: 1

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    K.v.Klitzing, G.Dorda,andM.Pepper,NewMethodfor High-AccuracyDeterminationoftheFine-StructureCon- stant Based on Quantized Hall Resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 494 (1980)

    work page 1980

  23. [23]

    Zhang, Y.-W

    Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Ex- perimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene, Nature438, 201 (2005), pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science340, 167 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Q. Ma, A. G. Grushin, and K. S. Burch, Topology and geometry under the nonlinear electromagnetic spotlight, Nat. Mater.20, 1601 (2021), publisher: Nature Publish- ing Group

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    P.Törmä,Essay: Wherecanquantumgeometryleadus?, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 240001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    M. Kang, S. Kim, Y. Qian, P. M. Neves, L. Ye, J. Jung, D. Puntel, F. Mazzola, S. Fang, C. Jozwiak, A. Bost- wick, E. Rotenberg, J. Fuji, I. Vobornik, J.-H. Park, J. G. Checkelsky, B.-J. Yang, and R. Comin, Measurements of the quantum geometric tensor in solids, Nat. Phys.21, 110 (2025), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Viñas Boström, T

    E. Viñas Boström, T. S. Parvini, J. W. McIver, A. Ru- bio, S. V. Kusminskiy, and M. A. Sentef, Direct optical probe of magnon topology in two-dimensional quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 026701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Koller, V

    E. Koller, V. Leeb, N. B. Perkins, and J. Knolle, Raman circular dichroism and quantum geometry of chiral quan- tum spin liquids (2025), arXiv:2503.14091 [cond-mat.str- el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    R. Yuan, W. J. Jankowski, K. Shen, and R.-J. Slager, Quantum geometry of altermagnetic magnons probed by light (2025), arXiv:2508.02781 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    A. P. Joy and A. Rosch, Raman spectroscopy of anyons in generic kitaev spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B112, 184411 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    P. A. Fleury and R. Loudon, Scattering of light by one- and two-magnon excitations, Phys. Rev.166, 514 (1968)

    work page 1968

  35. [36]

    B. S. Shastry and B. I. Shraiman, Raman scat- tering in mott-hubbard systems, International Journal of Modern Physics B05, 365 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979291000237

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217979291000237 1991

  36. [37]

    P. J. Freitas and R. R. P. Singh, Two-magnon raman scattering in insulating cuprates: Modifications of the effective raman operator, Phys. Rev. B62, 5525 (2000)

    work page 2000

  37. [38]

    Ko, Z.-X

    W.-H. Ko, Z.-X. Liu, T.-K. Ng, and P. A. Lee, Raman signature of theU(1)dirac spin-liquid state in the spin-1 2 kagome system, Phys. Rev. B81, 024414 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [39]

    Y. Yang, M. Li, I. Rousochatzakis, and N. B. Perkins, Non-loudon-fleury raman scattering in spin-orbit coupled mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B104, 144412 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [40]

    Schüler, U

    M. Schüler, U. D. Giovannini, H. Hübener, A. Rubio, M. A. Sentef, and P. Werner, Local berry curvature sig- natures in dichroic angle-resolved photoelectron spec- troscopy from two-dimensional materials, Science Ad- vances6, eaay2730 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [41]

    G. E. Topp, C. J. Eckhardt, D. M. Kennes, M. A. Sen- tef, and P. Törmä, Light-matter coupling and quantum geometry in moiré materials, Phys. Rev. B104, 064306 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [42]

    Y. S. Liu, E. Viñas Boström, M. A. Sentef, and S. V. Kusminskiy, in preparation

    work page

  42. [43]

    D. J. Passos, G. B. Ventura, J. M. V. P. Lopes, J. M. B. L. d. Santos, and N. M. R. Peres, Nonlinear optical responses of crystalline systems: Results from a velocity gauge analysis, Phys. Rev. B97, 235446 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [44]

    Chen, J.-H

    L. Chen, J.-H. Chung, B. Gao, T. Chen, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, Q. Huang, and P. Dai, Topological spin excitations in honeycomb ferromagnetCrI3, Phys. Rev. X8, 041028 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [45]

    Chen, J.-H

    L. Chen, J.-H. Chung, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, B. Winn, V. O. Garlea, D. L. Abernathy, B. Gao, M. Au- gustin, E. J. G. Santos, and P. Dai, Magnetic field effect on topological spin excitations incri3, Phys. Rev. X11, 031047 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [46]

    Z. Cai, S. Bao, Z.-L. Gu, Y.-P. Gao, Z. Ma, Y. Shang- guan, W. Si, Z.-Y. Dong, W. Wang, Y. Wu, D. Lin, 7 J. Wang, K. Ran, S. Li, D. Adroja, X. Xi, S.-L. Yu, X. Wu, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen, Topological magnon insula- tor spin excitations in the two-dimensional ferromagnet crbr3, Phys. Rev. B104, L020402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [47]

    F. Zhu, L. Zhang, X. Wang, F. J. dos Santos, J. Song, T. Mueller, K. Schmalzl, W. F. Schmidt, A. Ivanov, J. T. Park, J. Xu, J. Ma, S. Lounis, S. Blügel, Y. Mokrousov, Y. Su, and T. Brückel, Topologi- cal magnon insulators in two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnetsCrSiTe 3 andCrGeTe 3: Toward intrinsic gap-tunability, Sci. Adv.7, eabi7532 (2021), https:...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi7532 2021

  47. [48]

    A. H. MacDonald, S. M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, t U expansion for the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B37, 9753 (1988)

    work page 1988

  48. [49]

    Yildirim, A

    T. Yildirim, A. B. Harris, A. Aharony, and O. Entin- Wohlman, Anisotropic spin Hamiltonians due to spin- orbit and Coulomb exchange interactions, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10239 (1995)

    work page 1995

  49. [50]

    Takahashi, Half-filled hubbard model at low temper- ature, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics10, 1289 (1977)

    M. Takahashi, Half-filled hubbard model at low temper- ature, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics10, 1289 (1977)

    work page 1977

  50. [51]

    Tasaki,Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many- Body Systems, Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer, 2020)

    H. Tasaki,Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many- Body Systems, Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer, 2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [52]

    Eckstein, J

    M. Eckstein, J. H. Mentink, and P. Werner, Designing spin and orbital exchange Hamiltonians with ultrashort electricfieldtransients,arXiv10.48550/arXiv.1703.03269 (2017)

    work page arXiv 2017

  52. [53]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for detailed derivations

    work page

  53. [54]

    Kitamura, T

    S. Kitamura, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Probing and control- ling spin chirality in mott insulators by circularly polar- ized laser, Phys. Rev. B96, 014406 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [55]

    Sen and R

    D. Sen and R. Chitra, Large-Ulimit of a hubbard model in a magnetic field: Chiral spin interactions and param- agnetism, Phys. Rev. B51, 1922 (1995)

    work page 1922

  55. [56]

    O. I. Motrunich, Orbital magnetic field effects in spin liquid with spinon fermi sea: Possible application to κ−(ET)2Cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. B73, 155115 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [57]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    work page 1940

  57. [58]

    S. A. Owerre, A first theoretical realization of honeycomb topological magnon insulator, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt.28, 386001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [59]

    Bacci and E

    S. Bacci and E. Gagliano, Temperature dependence of the raman scattering in the two-dimensional heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B43, 6224 (1991)

    work page 1991

  59. [60]

    Cenker, B

    J. Cenker, B. Huang, N. Suri, P. Thijssen, A. Miller, T. Song, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Direct observation of two- dimensional magnons in atomically thin CrI3, Nat. Phys. 17, 20 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [61]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature546, 270 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [62]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  62. [63]

    Young Talent Support Plan

    Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Observation of the magnon hall effect, Science329, 297 (2010), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1188260

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1188260 2010

  63. [64]

    B.Ghosh, Y.Onishi, S.-Y.Xu, H.Lin, L.Fu,andA.Ban- sil, Probing quantum geometry through optical conduc- tivity and magnetic circular dichroism, Science Advances 10, eado1761 (2024), publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page 2024

  64. [65]

    Lysne, M

    M. Lysne, M. Schüler, and P. Werner, Quantum optics measurement scheme for quantum geometry and topo- logical invariants, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156901 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [66]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Rie- mannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nature Physics18, 290 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [67]

    B. S. Shastry and B. I. Shraiman, Theory of raman scat- tering in mott-hubbard systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 1068 (1990)

    work page 1990

  67. [68]

    Light-Matter-Coupling formalism for magnons: probing quantum geometry with light

    M.A.Sentef, J.Li, F.Künzel,andM.Eckstein,Quantum to classical crossover of floquet engineering in correlated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033033 (2020). S1 Supplementary Material for "Light-Matter-Coupling formalism for magnons: probing quantum geometry with light" I. OUTLINE In this Supplementary Material, we present detailed derivations that demon...

    work page 2020