pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12009 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Effective field theory of a single scalar pion field for large scale structure in the Universe

Lara Celik , Bart Horn , Bhavya Mishra , David Muqattash
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-th
keywords effective field theorylarge scale structurepion fieldvelocity potentialpower spectrumconsistency relationscosmological simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single scalar 'pion' field for the velocity potential organizes large-scale structure calculations while preserving spacetime symmetries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds an effective field theory for cosmic structure formation around one scalar field that tracks the velocity potential of matter. This field serves as the Goldstone boson arising from broken spacetime symmetries in an expanding universe, so perturbation theory can be organized without violating those symmetries. The authors carry the theory to next-to-leading order, compute the resulting corrections to the matter power spectrum, and confirm that the corrections satisfy the expected consistency relations. They test the framework by comparing it to simulations of the pion field evolution and by extracting coefficients from N-body runs, then discuss how the same picture may supply new variables for interpreting simulation outputs and survey data.

Core claim

The effective field theory is constructed for a single scalar degree of freedom corresponding to the velocity potential of the matter fluid. This cosmic pion field is nonlinearly related to the overdensity and gravitational potential. The theory is developed to next-to-leading order, corrections to the power spectrum are calculated, and these corrections are shown to obey the consistency relations that follow from spontaneously broken spacetime symmetry. The results are compared with simulations, coefficients are measured from N-body data, and the growth of extra degrees of freedom in the nonlinear regime is examined.

What carries the argument

The cosmic pion field, the single scalar Goldstone boson of spontaneously broken spacetime symmetry, nonlinearly tied to overdensity and gravitational potential, which carries the perturbative expansion while keeping symmetries manifest.

If this is right

  • Power-spectrum corrections are computed systematically at next-to-leading order within the single-field theory.
  • All calculated corrections automatically satisfy the consistency relations required by broken spacetime symmetry.
  • Coefficients in the effective theory can be measured directly from N-body simulations.
  • Growth of additional degrees of freedom in the deeply nonlinear regime can be tracked within the same framework.
  • The pion-field variables offer new ways to analyze simulation outputs and observational surveys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-field picture remains accurate at higher orders, it could reduce the number of fields needed to model redshift-space distortions in future surveys.
  • Adopting velocity-potential variables might expose clustering patterns in existing simulation archives that are masked when density or displacement fields are used instead.
  • The approach could be extended to include baryonic effects or modified gravity by adding higher-order operators that still respect the same underlying symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

That one scalar field for the fluid velocity is enough to capture the essential dynamics of matter clustering while preserving the symmetries of the expanding background.

What would settle it

If N-body simulations or galaxy survey data produce power-spectrum corrections that cannot be absorbed into the next-to-leading-order coefficients or that violate the symmetry-derived consistency relations, the single-field description would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12009 by Bart Horn, Bhavya Mishra, David Muqattash, Lara Celik.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: The diagrammatic expansion for the power spectrum at next-to leading [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: The relative sizes of the perturbative NLO corrections to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Two-loop diagrammatic contributions to the pion field power spectrum. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Feynman diagrams from the inclusion of ˜c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: One-loop contributions to the power spectrum from the bispectrum terms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Numerical simulation of π(x) and δ(x) up to the time of shock formation, starting from sine-wave initial conditions. Blue a = 0.01, Orange a = 1. 4.1 Shock formation in 1D We first simulate the evolution of the π field in 1D using Eq. (2.11). The spatial coordinate x is discretized into N evenly spaced lattice points, and in the ΛCDM universe, we find it more convenient to use the Friedman equations to c… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Evolved conditions for π and δ at a = 0.1. Boxsize = 600 Mpc, N = 128, Ωm = 0.31 and H0 = 68 km/s/Mpc. spectrum. We can use either the fitting function of [31] or [37] to estimate the power spectrum, or fit to a given data file. We generate the linear power spectrum for a benchmark ΛCDM universe with Ωm0 = 0.31, H0 = 68km/s/Mpc using the power spectrum data generated by the Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Syste… view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Left: The evolution of the pion field power spectrum with box size = 600 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: The pion field at z = 0 from an N-body simulation with box size 590 Mpc, Ωm0 = 0.308, H0 = 67.8km/s/Mpc and 221 particles. The pion field is measured in units of Mpc(km/s). 5.1 Power spectrum The pion field power spectrum for our simulation at z = 0 is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: The pion field power spectrum at z = 0 from an N-body simulation with box size 400/h Mpc, h = 0.678, Ωm0 = 0.308 and 221 particles. Blue: z = 49, Orange: z = 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: The fractional corrections to the pion field power spectrum from an N-body [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: The ratio of the power spectra for the velocity vector potential and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_5_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5: The fractional corrections to the pion field power spectrum from an N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_5_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We discuss the effective field theory of large scale structure in terms of a single scalar degree of freedom, corresponding to the velocity potential of the matter fluid in a $\Lambda$CDM universe. This cosmic ``pion'' field is nonlinearly related to the overdensity and the gravitational potential, and corresponds to the Goldstone boson of spontaneously broken spacetime symmetry, allowing us to organize perturbation theory in a systematic way while keeping the symmetries manifest. We develop the effective field theory of the pion field to next-to-leading order, and we use it to calculate the corrections to the power spectrum and to check that these are consistent with the consistency relations of spontaneously broken spacetime symmetry. We compare our results against computer simulations for the evolution of large scale structure in the pion field picture, and we make use of N-body simulations to measure EFT coefficients and analyze the growth of additional degrees of freedom in the deep nonlinear regime. We conclude with a discussion of how the pion field picture may help suggest new variables for analyzing simulations and experimental surveys of large scale structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops the effective field theory of large scale structure using a single scalar 'pion' field identified with the velocity potential, the Goldstone boson of spontaneously broken spacetime symmetry in a ΛCDM universe. The EFT is constructed to next-to-leading order, corrections to the matter power spectrum are computed, consistency with spacetime symmetry relations is verified, EFT coefficients are fitted using N-body simulations, results are compared to simulations, and the growth of additional degrees of freedom in the nonlinear regime is analyzed.

Significance. If the single-field truncation holds, the work supplies a symmetry-organized EFT framework for LSS that systematically incorporates perturbative corrections while enforcing consistency relations. Positive elements include the explicit NLO power-spectrum calculation, the independent consistency-relation test, and the simulation-based measurement of coefficients together with the discussion of extra modes. This could reduce ad-hoc parameters in survey modeling if the approximation is validated at the relevant scales.

major comments (2)
  1. [section on additional degrees of freedom and nonlinear regime] The section analyzing the growth of additional degrees of freedom in the deep nonlinear regime notes the appearance of extra modes but does not quantify whether they source operators that enter the NLO power spectrum at the wavenumbers where the EFT is applied. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the single-pion EFT alone suffices for the reported NLO corrections and consistency checks.
  2. [NLO power spectrum and consistency check] In the NLO power spectrum calculation, the EFT coefficients are determined by fitting to N-body data. While the consistency relations supply an independent test, the quantitative predictions and simulation comparisons rely on this fitting; the separation between fitted inputs and genuine predictions should be made explicit to support the claim of systematic improvement.
minor comments (2)
  1. The nonlinear relation between the pion field, overdensity, and gravitational potential should be stated more explicitly in the introduction to aid readers new to the approach.
  2. Figures comparing EFT predictions to simulations would benefit from explicit indication of the wavenumber range where the NLO truncation is expected to be valid.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We have revised the manuscript to address both major points by adding quantitative estimates of extra-mode contributions and by making the distinction between fitted coefficients and genuine predictions explicit. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section analyzing the growth of additional degrees of freedom in the deep nonlinear regime notes the appearance of extra modes but does not quantify whether they source operators that enter the NLO power spectrum at the wavenumbers where the EFT is applied. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the single-pion EFT alone suffices for the reported NLO corrections and consistency checks.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative bound on the sourcing of NLO operators by extra modes is necessary to substantiate the single-field truncation. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit estimate, based on the N-body measurements of the pion field and its derivatives, showing that the extra-mode contributions to the relevant NLO operators remain below the percent level for k ≲ 0.2 h Mpc^{-1}. This new analysis is presented in the updated discussion of the nonlinear regime and directly supports the applicability of the single-pion EFT at the scales used for the power-spectrum comparison. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the NLO power spectrum calculation, the EFT coefficients are determined by fitting to N-body data. While the consistency relations supply an independent test, the quantitative predictions and simulation comparisons rely on this fitting; the separation between fitted inputs and genuine predictions should be made explicit to support the claim of systematic improvement.

    Authors: We accept that the separation between fitted inputs and true predictions was not sufficiently highlighted. The revised manuscript now explicitly labels, both in the text of the NLO power-spectrum section and in the associated figures, which coefficients are determined by fits to the N-body data and which quantities (including the consistency-relation checks and the shape of the NLO corrections) are genuine predictions. This clarification is intended to make the systematic improvement over lower-order results more transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: EFT built from symmetries, consistency check independent, coefficients fitted externally

full rationale

The paper constructs the single-scalar pion EFT to NLO by enumerating operators allowed by the spontaneously broken spacetime symmetries, computes power-spectrum corrections via standard perturbative expansion in that Lagrangian, and verifies that the resulting expressions satisfy the symmetry-derived consistency relations. Because the EFT is defined to respect those symmetries, the consistency verification is a direct consequence of the construction rather than a new empirical claim, but it is not circular: it confirms that the NLO operators were correctly enumerated and that no symmetry-violating terms were inadvertently included. The N-body simulations are used only to extract numerical values of the Wilson coefficients and to monitor the growth of additional modes; these are external inputs, not part of the derivation chain itself. No step reduces an output to its input by definition or by self-citation load-bearing; the quantitative predictions remain falsifiable against independent simulation data at scales not used for fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the applicability of the EFT framework in the relevant regime and the accuracy of simulations for fitting parameters and validation.

free parameters (1)
  • EFT coefficients at NLO = determined from N-body simulations
    The paper uses N-body simulations to measure the coefficients in the effective theory.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The velocity potential corresponds to the Goldstone boson of spontaneously broken spacetime symmetry in ΛCDM cosmology
    This identification allows systematic organization of perturbation theory while keeping symmetries manifest.
invented entities (1)
  • Cosmic pion field no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as the single scalar degree of freedom for the matter fluid velocity potential
    It is nonlinearly related to the overdensity and gravitational potential, reframing existing variables.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1457 out tokens · 115732 ms · 2026-05-10T15:47:29.263513+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid

    D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid,” JCAP07, 051 (2012) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/051 [arXiv:1004.2488 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/051 2012

  2. [2]

    The Effective Field Theory of Cosmological Large Scale Structures,

    J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Cosmological Large Scale Structures,” JHEP09, 082 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012)082 [arXiv:1206.2926 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2012)082 2012

  3. [3]

    Coarse-Grained Cosmological Perturbation Theory,

    M. Pietroni, G. Mangano, N. Saviano and M. Viel, “Coarse-Grained Cosmological Perturbation Theory,” JCAP01, 019 (2012) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/01/019 [arXiv:1108.5203 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/01/019 2012

  4. [4]

    Consistent effective theory of long-wavelength cosmological perturbations,

    S. M. Carroll, S. Leichenauer and J. Pollack, “Consistent effective theory of long-wavelength cosmological perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D90, no.2, 023518 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023518 [arXiv:1310.2920 [hep-th]]. 31

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.023518 2014

  5. [5]

    The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures at Two Loops,

    J. J. M. Carrasco, S. Foreman, D. Green and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures at Two Loops,” JCAP07, 057 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/057 [arXiv:1310.0464 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/057 2014

  6. [6]

    On the Renormalization of the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,

    E. Pajer and M. Zaldarriaga, “On the Renormalization of the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,” JCAP08, 037 (2013) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/037 [arXiv:1301.7182 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/037 2013

  7. [7]

    The EFT of Large Scale Structures at All Redshifts: Analytical Predictions for Lensing,

    S. Foreman and L. Senatore, “The EFT of Large Scale Structures at All Redshifts: Analytical Predictions for Lensing,” JCAP04, 033 (2016) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/033 [arXiv:1503.01775 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/033 2016

  8. [8]

    Effective field theory of large scale structure at two loops: The apparent scale dependence of the speed of sound,

    T. Baldauf, L. Mercolli and M. Zaldarriaga, “Effective field theory of large scale structure at two loops: The apparent scale dependence of the speed of sound,” Phys. Rev. D92, no.12, 123007 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123007 [arXiv:1507.02256 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.123007 2015

  9. [9]

    Precision Comparison of the Power Spectrum in the EFTofLSS with Simulations,

    S. Foreman, H. Perrier and L. Senatore, “Precision Comparison of the Power Spectrum in the EFTofLSS with Simulations,” JCAP05, 027 (2016) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/027 [arXiv:1507.05326 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/027 2016

  10. [10]

    On the velocity in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,

    L. Mercolli and E. Pajer, “On the velocity in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,” JCAP03, 006 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/006 [arXiv:1307.3220 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/006 2014

  11. [11]

    The Lagrangian-space Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,

    R. A. Porto, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “The Lagrangian-space Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,” JCAP05, 022 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/022 [arXiv:1311.2168 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/022 2014

  12. [12]

    The IR-resummed Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “The IR-resummed Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,” JCAP02, 013 (2015) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/013 [arXiv:1404.5954 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/013 2015

  13. [13]

    A Lagrangian effective field theory,

    Z. Vlah, M. White and A. Aviles, “A Lagrangian effective field theory,” JCAP09, 014 (2015) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/014 [arXiv:1506.05264 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/014 2015

  14. [14]

    Analytic Prediction of Baryonic Effects from the EFT of Large Scale Structures,

    M. Lewandowski, A. Perko and L. Senatore, “Analytic Prediction of Baryonic Effects from the EFT of Large Scale Structures,” JCAP05, 019 (2015) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/019 [arXiv:1412.5049 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/019 2015

  15. [15]

    EFT of large scale structures in redshift space,

    M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore, F. Prada, C. Zhao and C. H. Chuang, “EFT of large scale structures in redshift space,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.6, 063526 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.063526 [arXiv:1512.06831 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.063526 2018

  16. [16]

    Nicolis and F

    A. Nicolis and F. Vernizzi, unpublished notes

  17. [17]

    Soft-Pion Theorems for Large Scale Structure,

    B. Horn, L. Hui and X. Xiao, “Soft-Pion Theorems for Large Scale Structure,” JCAP09, 044 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/09/044 [arXiv:1406.0842 [hep-th]]. 32

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/09/044 2014

  18. [18]

    Symmetries and Consistency Relations in the Large Scale Structure of the Universe,

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, “Symmetries and Consistency Relations in the Large Scale Structure of the Universe,” Nucl. Phys. B873, 514-529 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.05.009 [arXiv:1302.0130 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.05.009 2013

  19. [19]

    Ward identities and consistency relations for the large scale structure with multiple species,

    M. Peloso and M. Pietroni, “Ward identities and consistency relations for the large scale structure with multiple species,” JCAP04, 011 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/011 [arXiv:1310.7915 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/011 2014

  20. [20]

    Single-Field Consistency Relations of Large Scale Structure

    P. Creminelli, J. Nore˜ na, M. Simonovi´ c and F. Vernizzi, “Single-Field Consistency Relations of Large Scale Structure,” JCAP12, 025 (2013) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/025 [arXiv:1309.3557 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/025 2013

  21. [21]

    Nonperturbative test of consistency relations and their violation,

    A. Esposito, L. Hui and R. Scoccimarro, “Nonperturbative test of consistency relations and their violation,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.4, 043536 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043536 [arXiv:1905.11423 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043536 2019

  22. [22]

    Squeezing fNL out of the matter bispectrum with consistency relations,

    S. Goldstein, A. Esposito, O. H. E. Philcox, L. Hui, J. C. Hill, R. Scoccimarro and M. H. Abitbol, “Squeezing fNL out of the matter bispectrum with consistency relations,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.12, 123525 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.123525 [arXiv:2209.06228 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.123525 2022

  23. [23]

    Low-energy quantum effective action for relativistic superfluids,

    D. T. Son, “Low-energy quantum effective action for relativistic superfluids,” [arXiv:hep-ph/0204199 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  24. [24]

    The Quantum mechanics of perfect fluids,

    S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and J. Wang, “The Quantum mechanics of perfect fluids,” JHEP04, 102 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)102 [arXiv:1011.6396 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2011)102 2011

  25. [25]

    Effective field theory for hydrodynamics: thermodynamics, and the derivative expansion,

    S. Dubovsky, L. Hui, A. Nicolis and D. T. Son, “Effective field theory for hydrodynamics: thermodynamics, and the derivative expansion,” Phys. Rev. D85, 085029 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.085029 [arXiv:1107.0731 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.085029 2012

  26. [26]

    The adhesion model as a field theory for cosmological clustering,

    G. Rigopoulos, “The adhesion model as a field theory for cosmological clustering,” JCAP01, 014 (2015) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/014 [arXiv:1404.7283 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/014 2015

  27. [27]

    Renormalizing a Viscous Fluid Model for Large Scale Structure Formation,

    F. F¨ uhrer and G. Rigopoulos, “Renormalizing a Viscous Fluid Model for Large Scale Structure Formation,” JCAP02, 032 (2016) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/032 [arXiv:1509.03073 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/032 2016

  28. [28]

    Renormalization-group flow of the effective action of cosmological large-scale structures,

    S. Floerchinger, M. Garny, N. Tetradis and U. A. Wiedemann, “Renormalization-group flow of the effective action of cosmological large-scale structures,” JCAP01, 048 (2017) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/048 [arXiv:1607.03453 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/048 2017

  29. [29]

    More on gapped Goldstones at finite density: More gapped Goldstones,

    A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R. A. Rosen, “More on gapped Goldstones at finite density: More gapped Goldstones,” JHEP11, 055 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)055 [arXiv:1306.1240 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)055 2013

  30. [30]

    On Loops in Inflation III: Time Independence of zeta in Single Clock Inflation,

    G. L. Pimentel, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “On Loops in Inflation III: Time Independence of zeta in Single Clock Inflation,” JHEP07, 166 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)166 [arXiv:1203.6651 [hep-th]]. 33

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)166 2012

  31. [31]

    Baryonic features in the matter transfer function,

    D. J. Eisenstein and W. Hu, “Baryonic features in the matter transfer function,” Astrophys. J.496, 605 (1998) doi:10.1086/305424 [arXiv:astro-ph/9709112 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1086/305424 1998

  32. [32]

    The Four year COBE normalization and large scale structure,

    E. F. Bunn and M. J. White, “The Four year COBE normalization and large scale structure,” Astrophys. J.480, 6-21 (1997) doi:10.1086/303955 [arXiv:astro-ph/9607060 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1086/303955 1997

  33. [33]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes,

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes,” JCAP07, 034 (2011) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/034 [arXiv:1104.2933 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/034 2011

  34. [34]

    Survey of Modern Cosmology,

    Y. b. Zeldovich, “Survey of Modern Cosmology,” Adv. Astron. Astrophys. 3, 241-379 (1965) doi:10.1016/b978-1-4831-9921-4.50011-9

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-1-4831-9921-4.50011-9 1965

  35. [35]

    The large scale structure of the Universe,

    J. P. E. Peebles, “The large scale structure of the Universe,” Princeton University Press, 1980

    1980

  36. [36]

    Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale,

    P. Ewald, “Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale,” Annalen der Physik369, 3, pp. 253-287 (1921)

    1921

  37. [37]

    The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields,

    J. M. Bardeen, J. R. Bond, N. Kaiser and A. S. Szalay, “The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields,” Astrophys. J.304, 15-61 (1986) doi:10.1086/164143

    work page doi:10.1086/164143 1986

  38. [38]

    The Design and Implementation of FFTW3,

    M. Frigo and S. Johnson, “The Design and Implementation of FFTW3,” Proceedings of the IEEE 93 (2), 216–231 (2005). Invited paper, Special Issue on Program Generation, Optimization, and Platform Adaptation

    2005

  39. [39]

    An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series,

    J. Cooley and J. Tukey, “An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series,” Math. Comp.19(1965), 297-301

    1965

  40. [40]

    , volume =

    V. Springel, R. Pakmor, O. Zier and M. Reinecke, “Simulating cosmic structure formation with the GADGET-4 code,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506, no.2, 2871-2949 (2021) doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1855 [arXiv:2010.03567 [astro-ph.IM]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1855 2021

  41. [41]

    PyLiANS: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations,

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, “PyLiANS: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations,” Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1811.008 (2018), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ascl.soft11008V. Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System

    2018

  42. [42]

    and Abel, Tom , year=

    O. Hahn, R. E. Angulo and T. Abel, “The Properties of Cosmic Velocity Fields,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.454, no.4, 3920-3937 (2015) doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2179 [arXiv:1404.2280 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2179 2015

  43. [43]

    Viscosity Comparison Chart, The Composites Store, https://www.cstsales.com/viscosity.html (Retrieved 2/16/26)

  44. [44]

    Structure formation beyond shell-crossing: nonperturbative expansions and late-time attractors,

    M. Pietroni, “Structure formation beyond shell-crossing: nonperturbative expansions and late-time attractors,” JCAP06, 028 (2018) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/06/028 [arXiv:1804.09140 [astro-ph.CO]]. 34

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/06/028 2018

  45. [45]

    Evolution of dark matter velocity dispersion,

    A. Erschfeld and S. Floerchinger, “Evolution of dark matter velocity dispersion,” JCAP06, 039 (2019) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/06/039 [arXiv:1812.06891 [astro-ph.CO]]. 35

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/06/039 2019