arxiv: 2604.12467 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Energies and lifetimes of the 9p and 10p excited states in atomic francium

P. Lass\`egues , A. Ajayakumar , M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis , O. Ahmad , M. Au , J. Berbalk , D. Bettaney , B. van den Borne

show 24 more authors

A. Chakraborty T.E. Cocolios M. Duggan C. Fajardo K.T. Flanagan R.F. Garcia Ruiz R. de Groote D. Gonzalez-Acevedo A. Kastberg A. Koszor\'us L. Lalanne K.M. Lynch D.T. McLeroy A. McGlone G. Neyens L. Nies L. Quanjel A. Raggio J. Reilly B.K. Sahoo J. Snikeris J. Warbinek S.G. Wilkins X.F. Yang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 06:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

keywords franciumexcited statesradiative lifetimesatomic wavenumbersrelativistic coupled-clustercollinear resonance ionization spectroscopyalkali atoms

0 comments

The pith

First measurements of francium 9p and 10p state energies and lifetimes test relativistic theory with good agreement on lifetimes but a global energy offset.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the first experimental values for the absolute wavenumbers and radiative lifetimes of the 9p and 10p excited states in atomic francium. These data were obtained via collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy on a beam of 221Fr atoms. The results are presented as a precision test of relativistic coupled-cluster calculations for the heaviest alkali atom, showing close agreement for the lifetimes and for the relative spacing between levels while displaying a consistent shift in the absolute energy scale.

Core claim

The central claim is that the measured absolute wavenumbers for the 9p ²P_{1/2,3/2} and 10p ²P_{1/2,3/2} levels together with their radiative lifetimes supply a new experimental benchmark for relativistic coupled-cluster theory, agreeing well on lifetimes and relative excitation energies yet revealing a residual global offset in absolute energies.

What carries the argument

Collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy (CRIS) on a 221Fr atomic beam, compared directly to relativistic coupled-cluster predictions for the same quantities.

If this is right

The observed agreement on lifetimes supports the reliability of relativistic coupled-cluster methods for calculating transition rates in other heavy alkali atoms.
The persistent offset in absolute energies points to the need for refined treatment of core-valence correlation or higher-order relativistic corrections in the theory.
These data enable quantitative planning of laser-cooling and trapping sequences that rely on the 9p and 10p states as intermediate levels.
Relative energy spacings that match theory allow accurate prediction of additional unobserved transitions within the same n-manifolds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the energy offset scales with principal quantum number, it may arise from a common underestimation of the valence-electron screening of the nuclear field.
Extending the same CRIS approach to the 11p and 12p states would test whether the offset remains constant or changes with increasing n.
The measured lifetimes supply a direct calibration point for optical-pumping efficiencies in future francium parity-violation experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The CRIS measurements on the 221Fr beam capture the true absolute wavenumbers and lifetimes without significant unaccounted systematic effects from laser calibration, beam velocity, or background contributions.

What would settle it

An independent determination of the same 9p or 10p transition wavenumbers or lifetimes by a different method, such as two-step laser excitation in a trapped francium sample, that differs from the reported values by more than the stated experimental uncertainty would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12467 by A. Ajayakumar, A. Chakraborty, A. Kastberg, A. Koszor\'us, A. McGlone, A. Raggio, B.K. Sahoo, B. van den Borne, C. Fajardo, D. Bettaney, D. Gonzalez-Acevedo, D.T. McLeroy, G. Neyens, J. Berbalk, J. Reilly, J. Snikeris, J. Warbinek, K.M. Lynch, K.T. Flanagan, L. Lalanne, L. Nies, L. Quanjel, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, M. Au, M. Duggan, O. Ahmad, P. Lass\`egues, R. de Groote, R.F. Garcia Ruiz, S.G. Wilkins, T.E. Cocolios, X.F. Yang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Overview of the CRIS beam line, detailing the sequence of ion production, mass separation, bunching within [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Measured spectra for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Typical decay curves for the 9p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Lifetime results for the 8p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Calibration curve for the OPO laser, based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Pulse timing profiles of the lasers and their pulse-to-pulse timing stability (jitter) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Typical decay curves for the 9p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Typical decay curves for the 10p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Typical decay curves for the 10p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present the first measurement of 9p 2P1/2,3/2 and 10p 2P1/2,3/2 excited levels absolute wavenumbers and radiative lifetime in francium. We used the Collinear Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy (CRIS) technique, applied on a beam of 221Fr atoms. Prior to this work, no experimental data existed for francium p-states with n > 8. The results provide a precision experimental test of relativistic coupled-cluster theory for the heaviest alkali, showing good agreement for lifetimes and relative excitation energies, despite a residual global offset in absolute energies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper supplies the first measured energies and lifetimes for francium's 9p and 10p states, which is genuinely new, though the absolute calibration needs a hard look to support the theory test claim.

read the letter

The punchline is that this work gives the first experimental values for the 9p and 10p levels in francium. Prior data stopped at n=8, so these absolute wavenumbers and radiative lifetimes are new. The experiment uses the CRIS technique on a 221Fr beam, which is a solid choice for this system. The comparison to relativistic coupled-cluster theory works well for the lifetimes and the relative energies, providing a check on the calculations for the heaviest alkali. The main soft spot is the global offset in absolute energies. The stress-test note is right to flag the wavenumber calibration, beam velocity determination, and Doppler corrections as possible sources of systematic error. If the manuscript has a complete uncertainty budget that addresses these points, the relative agreement remains meaningful. Without it, the offset could just reflect an overall shift rather than a true test of the theory. This paper is for atomic spectroscopists and theorists working on heavy elements and precision measurements. It supplies concrete numbers that can be used to refine models. The thinking is clear in laying out the new data and the direct comparison. I would take it to the next reading group to discuss the new results. It should go to peer review because the measurements are original and the theory comparison is presented, even if the error analysis needs tightening.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first experimental determination of absolute wavenumbers and radiative lifetimes for the 9p ²P_{1/2,3/2} and 10p ²P_{1/2,3/2} states in ²²¹Fr using collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy (CRIS) on a radioactive ion beam. These new data are compared to relativistic coupled-cluster calculations, with the authors claiming good agreement for lifetimes and relative excitation energies despite a noted residual global offset in the absolute energy scale.

Significance. If the absolute calibration holds, the work supplies the first precision experimental benchmarks for n=9,10 p-states in the heaviest alkali atom, extending the francium database and providing a direct test of many-body relativistic methods that are central to ongoing fundamental-physics searches with Fr. The agreement on relative quantities and lifetimes would strengthen in the theoretical framework for heavy alkalis.

major comments (2)

[Experimental methods and results sections] The central claim of a precision test of relativistic coupled-cluster theory rests on the accuracy of the absolute wavenumbers. The manuscript reports a global offset in absolute energies but provides no line-by-line uncertainty budget that quantifies contributions from cw-laser frequency calibration, ²²¹Fr beam-velocity determination (including space-charge and residual-gas effects), and collinear Doppler-shift corrections. Without this, the observed offset cannot be distinguished from an unaccounted systematic scale error.
[Discussion and comparison with theory] The comparison to theory is presented only in summary form. The manuscript should include a table or figure that explicitly lists the measured absolute wavenumbers, relative intervals, lifetimes, and their uncertainties alongside the theoretical values, together with the numerical size of the reported global offset relative to the combined experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that 'no experimental data existed for francium p-states with n > 8' prior to this work; a brief literature check or citation confirming the status of n=8 data would strengthen this claim.
[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state whether the plotted energies are absolute wavenumbers or relative to a reference level, and whether error bars include statistical and systematic contributions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested details on uncertainties and the theory comparison.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Experimental methods and results sections] The central claim of a precision test of relativistic coupled-cluster theory rests on the accuracy of the absolute wavenumbers. The manuscript reports a global offset in absolute energies but provides no line-by-line uncertainty budget that quantifies contributions from cw-laser frequency calibration, ²²¹Fr beam-velocity determination (including space-charge and residual-gas effects), and collinear Doppler-shift corrections. Without this, the observed offset cannot be distinguished from an unaccounted systematic scale error.

Authors: We agree that a detailed uncertainty budget is required to substantiate the absolute energy scale and to interpret the reported global offset. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection and accompanying table that provides a line-by-line uncertainty budget. The table quantifies the contributions from cw-laser frequency calibration (wavemeter and frequency-comb traceability), ²²¹Fr beam-velocity determination (including space-charge and residual-gas corrections), and the collinear Doppler-shift evaluation. With these values we show that the observed offset exceeds the combined experimental uncertainty, supporting its interpretation as a genuine discrepancy rather than an unaccounted systematic. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion and comparison with theory] The comparison to theory is presented only in summary form. The manuscript should include a table or figure that explicitly lists the measured absolute wavenumbers, relative intervals, lifetimes, and their uncertainties alongside the theoretical values, together with the numerical size of the reported global offset relative to the combined experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

Authors: We concur that an explicit side-by-side comparison improves clarity. The revised manuscript now contains a new table that lists all measured absolute wavenumbers, relative intervals, and lifetimes (with uncertainties) next to the corresponding relativistic coupled-cluster theoretical predictions. The table also reports the numerical value of the global offset and compares it directly to the quadrature sum of experimental and theoretical uncertainties, allowing the reader to evaluate the agreement on relative energies and lifetimes at a glance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: primary experimental measurements compared to independent external theory

full rationale

The paper reports the first experimental determination of absolute wavenumbers and radiative lifetimes for the 9p and 10p states in francium via the CRIS technique applied to a 221Fr beam. These constitute new primary data. The comparison to relativistic coupled-cluster calculations (showing agreement on relative energies and lifetimes with a noted global offset in absolute energies) relies on external theory results rather than any internal fitting, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No derivation step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs; the experimental procedure and results stand independently against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As an experimental measurement paper, the central claim rests on the validity of the CRIS experimental procedure and data reduction rather than new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. No details on any fitted parameters in analysis or new theoretical constructs are provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1193 out tokens · 143248 ms · 2026-05-13T06:23:36.633258+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

[1]

X. C. Vidal, M. D’Onofrio, P. J. Fox, R. Torre, K. A. Ulmer, A. Aboubrahim, A. Albert, J. Alimena, B. C. Allanach,et al., Beyond the standard model physics at the hl-lhc and he-lhc (2019)

work page 2019
[2]

M. R. Tarbutt, J. J. Hudson, B. E. Sauer, and E. A. Hinds, Faraday Discussions142, 37 (2009)

work page 2009
[3]

Sakemi, K

Y. Sakemi, K. Harada, T. Hayamizu, M. Itoh, H. Kawa- mura, S. Liu, H. S. Nataraj, A. Oikawa,et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.302(2011)

work page 2011
[4]

Aubin, J

S. Aubin, J. Behr, R. Collister, V. Flambaum, E. Gomez, G. Gwinner, K. Jackson,et al., Hyperfine Interact214, 163 (2013)

work page 2013
[5]

Gomez, S

E. Gomez, S. Aubin, G. D. Sprouse, L. A. Orozco, and D. P. DeMille, Phys. Rev. A75, 033418 (2007)

work page 2007
[6]

T. Aoki, Y. Torii, B. Sahoo, B. Das, K. Harada, T. Hayamizu, K. Sakamoto, H. Kawamura, T. Inoue, A. Uchiyama,et al., Appl. Phys. B , 509 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

Kastberg, T

A. Kastberg, T. Aoki, B. Sahoo, Y. Sakemi, and B. Das, Physical Review A100, 050101 (2019)

work page 2019
[8]

Gomez, S

E. Gomez, S. Aubin, R. Collister, J. A. Behr, G. Gwinner, L. A. Orozco, M. R. Pearson, M. Tandecki, D. Sheng, and J. Zhang, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.387, 012004 (2012)

work page 2012
[9]

W. Z. Zhao, J. E. Simsarian, L. A. Orozco, W. Shi, and G. D. Sprouse, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4169 (1997)

work page 1997
[10]

U. I. Safronova, W. R. Johnson, and M. S. Safronova, Phys. Rev. A76, 042504 (2007)

work page 2007
[11]

B. K. Sahoo, D. K. Nandy, B. P. Das, and Y. Sakemi, Phys. Rev. A91, 042507 (2015)

work page 2015
[12]

Vajed-Samii, J

M. Vajed-Samii, J. Andriessen, B. P. Das, S. N. Ray, T. Lee, and T. P. Das, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1800 (1982)

work page 1982
[13]

Owusu, R

A. Owusu, R. W. Dougherty, G. Gowri, T. P. Das, and J. Andriessen, Phys. Rev. A56, 305 (1997)

work page 1997
[14]

Kramida, Y

A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and NIST ASD Team, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Bi´ emont, P

E. Bi´ emont, P. Quinet, and V. Van Renterghem, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.31, 5301 (1998)

work page 1998
[16]

Das and A

M. Das and A. C. Pradhan, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.52, 155001 (2019)

work page 2019
[18]

Kugler, Nucl

E. Kugler, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B79, 322 (1993)

work page 1993
[19]

Catherall, W

R. Catherall, W. Andreazza, M. Breitenfeldt, A. Dorsi- val, G. J. Focker, T. P. Gharsa, T. J. Giles, J.-L. Grenard, et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.44, 094002 (2017)

work page 2017
[20]

T. J. Giles, R. Catherall, V. Fedosseev, U. Georg, E. Ku- gler, J. Lettry, and M. Lindroos, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B204, 497 (2003)

work page 2003
[21]

Man´ e, J

E. Man´ e, J. Billowes, K. Blaum, P. Campbell, B. Cheal, P. Delahaye, K. T. Flanagan, D. H. Forest, H. Franberg, C. Geppert,et al., Eur. Phys. J. A42, 503 (2009)

work page 2009
[22]

Koszor´ us, J

A. Koszor´ us, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bissell, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, R. P. de Groote, G. Farooq- Smith, V. N. Fedosseev, K. T. Flanagan,et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B463, 398 (2020)

work page 2020
[23]

A. R. Vernon, R. P. de Groote, J. Billowes, C. L. Binner- sley, T. E. Cocolios, G. J. Farooq-Smith, K. T. Flanagan, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, W. Gins,et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth- ods Phys. Res. B463, 384 (2020)

work page 2020
[24]

D. A. Steck, Rubidium 87 d line data (2001)

work page 2001
[25]

W. Gins, R. P. de Groote, M. L. Bissell, C. Granados Buitrago, R. Ferrer, K. M. Lynch, G. Neyens, and S. Sels, Comp. Phys. Comm.222, 286 (2018)

work page 2018
[26]

Duong, P

H. Duong, P. Juncar, S. Liberman, A. Mueller, R. Neu- gart, E. Otten, B. Peuse, J. Pinard, H. Stroke, C. Thibault, and others, EPL3, 175 (1987)

work page 1987
[27]

J. E. Sansonetti, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data36, 497 (2007)

work page 2007
[28]

Budinˇ cevi´ c, J

I. Budinˇ cevi´ c, J. Billowes, M. Bissell, T. E. Cocolios, R. P. De Groote, S. De Schepper, V. N. Fedosseev, K. T. Flanagan, S. Franchoo, R. G. Ruiz, and others, Phys. Rev. C90, 014317 (2014)

work page 2014
[29]

Roberts, C

B. Roberts, C. Fairhall, and J. Ginges, Phys. Rev. A107, 052812 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

Tang, B.-Q

Y.-B. Tang, B.-Q. Lou, and T.-Y. Shi, Phys. Rev. A96, 022513 (2017)

work page 2017
[31]

Aubin, E

S. Aubin, E. Gomez, L. Orozco, and G. Sprouse, Phys. Rev. A70, 042504 (2004)

work page 2004
[34]

R. Pal, M. S. Safronova, W. R. Johnson, A. Derevianko, and S. G. Porsev, Phys. Rev. A75, 042515 (2007)

work page 2007
[35]

M. S. Safronova and U. I. Safronova, Phys. Rev. A83, 052508 (2011). Energies and lifetimes of the 9p and 10p excited states in atomic francium P. Lass` egues ,1,∗ A. Ajayakumar,2 M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis ,3 O. Ahmad,1 M. Au ,2, 4 J. Berbalk,1, 2 D. Bettaney,5 B. van den Borne ,1 A. Chakraborty ,6 T.E. Cocolios ,1 M. Duggan,5 C. Fajardo ,1, 7 K.T. Flana...

work page 2011
[36]

The timing jitter was determined as the standard deviation of the centroid distribution, with a value of 0.07 ns for the OPO and 0.49 ns for the Nd:YAG

were then fitted with a skewed Voigt profile, to extract the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM), 2.2 ns for the OPO and 10 ns for the Nd:YAG at the centroid. The timing jitter was determined as the standard deviation of the centroid distribution, with a value of 0.07 ns for the OPO and 0.49 ns for the Nd:YAG. –Experimental backgroundFor each lifetime mea- ...

work page 1915
[37]

A. R. Vernon, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bis- sell, T. E. Cocolios, G. J. Farooq-Smith, K. T. Flanagan, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, W. Gins, R. P. de Groote,et al., Spec. Acta B153, 61 (2019)

work page 2019
[38]

R. P. de Groote, M. Verlinde, V. Sonnenschein, K. T. Flanagan, I. Moore, and G. Neyens, Phys. Rev. A95, 032502 (2017)

work page 2017
[39]

R. P. De Groote, I. Budinˇ cevi´ c, J. Billowes, M. L. Bis- sell, T. E. Cocolios, G. J. Farooq-Smith, V. Fedosseev, K. Flanagan, S. Franchoo, R. G. Ruiz, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 132501 (2015)

work page 2015
[40]

D. C. Morton, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.130, 403 (2000)

work page 2000
[41]

B. K. Sahoo and B. P. Das, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 203001 (2018)

work page 2018
[42]

Yamanaka, B

N. Yamanaka, B. K. Sahoo, N. Yoshinaga, T. Sato, K. Asahi, and B. P. Das, EPJA53, 54 (2017)

work page 2017
[43]

Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, S

M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, S. G. Wilkins, P. Lass` egues, L. Lalanne, J. R. Reilly, O. Ahmad, M. Au, S. W. Bai, J. Berbalk,et al., Phys. Rev. A110, L010802 (2024)

work page 2024
[44]

Aubin, E

S. Aubin, E. Gomez, L. A. Orozco, and G. D. Sprouse, Phys. Rev. A70, 042504 (2004)

work page 2004
[45]

Van Wijngaarden and J

W. Van Wijngaarden and J. Xia, J. Quant. Spec. Rad. Tr.61, 557 (1999)

work page 1999
[46]

Aubin, E

S. Aubin, E. Gomez, L. Orozco, and G. Sprouse, Opt. Lett.28, 2055 (2003)

work page 2055
[47]

Gomez, L

E. Gomez, L. Orozco, A. P. Galvan, and G. Sprouse, Phys. Rev. A71, 062504 (2005)

work page 2005
[48]

Simsarian, L

J. Simsarian, L. A. Orozco, G. Sprouse, and W. Zhao, Phys. Rev. A57, 2448 (1998)

work page 1998
[49]

J. M. Grossman, R. P. Fliller, L. A. Orozco, M. R. Pear- son, and G. D. Sprouse, Phys. Rev. A62, 062502 (2000)

work page 2000