pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12533 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Recognition: unknown

Deciphering the nature of P^{Sigma}_{psi s} pentaquarks in the light of their electromagnetic multipole moments

Ula\c{s} \"Ozdem

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords pentaquarkshidden-charmelectromagnetic momentsQCD sum rulesdiquark structuremultipole momentsstrange pentaquarksheavy quark symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electromagnetic multipole moments distinguish the internal structure of strange hidden-charm pentaquarks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the magnetic dipole moments for all spin states and the electric quadrupole plus magnetic octupole moments for spin-3/2 states of the Sigma-type strange hidden-charm pentaquarks. It employs QCD light-cone sum rules with multiple diquark-diquark-antiquark interpolating currents, finding that scalar diquarks produce small charm-dominated moments while axial-vector diquarks produce larger flavor-sensitive ones with sign changes tied to quark charges. These patterns, together with the deformation signs and their correlations, supply four concrete discriminants when set against constituent quark model expectations, including a vanishing quadrupole for S-wave molecular pictures. A sympathetic reader cares because settling the five-quark arrangement tests the rules of quark binding in QCD for systems richer than ordinary mesons and baryons.

Core claim

Using six spin-1/2 and seven spin-3/2 diquark-diquark-antiquark interpolating currents in light-cone sum rules, the magnetic moments lie in the range -1.92 to -1.21 nuclear magnetons for scalar-diquark spin-1/2 states and remain small for spin-3/2 states, while axial-vector currents give larger values with sign reversals governed by the up-to-down charge ratio. Scalar-diquark currents produce oblate quadrupole deformations around -2.0 times 10 to the minus 2 fm squared dominated by the charm quark, whereas two-axial-vector currents can yield prolate values up to +8.0 times 10 to the minus 2 fm squared with occasional sign reversal; the octupole moment is topology-independent at approximately

What carries the argument

Diquark-diquark-antiquark interpolating currents in QCD light-cone sum rules that extract the electromagnetic multipole moments as direct probes of the pentaquark wave-function structure.

If this is right

  • Scalar diquark currents produce charm-dominated magnetic moments insensitive to light-quark flavor for both spin values.
  • Axial-vector diquark currents generate larger magnetic moments whose signs flip according to the ratio of up and down quark charges.
  • Non-zero electric quadrupole moments appear for most current choices and vanish only for S-wave molecular configurations.
  • The sign correlation between quadrupole and octupole moments directly reflects the relative 1/m_q weighting inside the state.
  • Currents with scalar antiquark coupling yield a universal octupole moment near -0.25 times 10 to the minus 3 fm cubed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future precision measurements at electron-ion colliders or upgraded LHCb could fix which current structure best matches the physical states.
  • The flavor sensitivity found for axial-vector currents implies that isospin-breaking differences within the Sigma triplet may be detectable.
  • The same sum-rule approach could be applied to non-strange hidden-charm pentaquarks to test whether the four discriminants remain universal.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen diquark-diquark-antiquark interpolating currents couple dominantly to the physical pentaquark states with negligible contamination from other resonances or continuum states.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the spin-1/2 magnetic moment with absolute value below 3 nuclear magnetons, or a vanishing electric quadrupole moment for any spin-3/2 state, would contradict the predictions from the axial-vector and scalar diquark currents.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12533 by Ula\c{s} \"Ozdem.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sum-rule analysis for the currents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Electric quadrupole moment analysis of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnetic octupole moment analysis of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We calculate electromagnetic multipole moments of $\Sigma$-type strange hidden-charm pentaquarks $P^{\Sigma}_{\psi s}$ (isospin triplet $\Sigma^+,\Sigma^0,\Sigma^-$) using QCD light-cone sum rules, with six (spin-1/2) and seven (spin-3/2) interpolating currents built from diquark-diquark-antiquark operators. We compute magnetic dipole $\mu$ for all channels and, for spin-3/2, electric quadrupole ${\cal Q}$ and magnetic octupole ${\cal O}$ moments (first computation), and give the first quark-flavor decomposition. Scalar diquark currents yield charm-dominated, flavor-insensitive moments ($\mu\in[-1.92,-1.21]\mu_N$ for spin-1/2, $|\mu|\lesssim1.2\mu_N$ for spin-3/2), consistent with heavy-quark spin symmetry. Axial-vector diquark currents produce larger, flavor-sensitive moments with sign reversals governed by $e_u/e_d=-2$. For ${\cal Q}$, scalar-diquark currents give oblate deformations ($Q_0\approx-2.0\times10^{-2}{\rm fm}^2$) dominated by charm, while two-axial-vector-diquark currents predict prolate values up to $Q_0=+8.0\times10^{-2}{\rm fm}^2$, with sign reversal for $[su][uc]\bar{c}$ in two currents. Currents with scalar antiquark coupling yield a topology-independent octupole ${\cal O}\approx-0.25\times10^{-3}{\rm fm}^3$, a lattice QCD benchmark. Comparison with constituent quark models identifies four discriminants: $|\mu|\gtrsim3\mu_N$ in spin-1/2; sign of $\mu$ for $[su][uc]\bar{c}$ in spin-3/2; non-zero ${\cal Q}$ (vanishes in $S$-wave molecules); and the ${\cal Q}$-${\cal O}$ sign correlation, probing $1/m_q$ weighting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper calculates the electromagnetic multipole moments of Σ-type strange hidden-charm pentaquarks P^Σ_ψs using QCD light-cone sum rules. With six spin-1/2 and seven spin-3/2 diquark-diquark-antiquark interpolating currents, it computes magnetic dipole moments μ for all channels and, for spin-3/2 states, the electric quadrupole Q and magnetic octupole O moments (claimed first computation). Numerical ranges are reported (e.g., μ ∈ [-1.92, -1.21] μ_N for scalar-diquark spin-1/2 currents; Q_0 ≈ -2.0×10^{-2} fm² for scalar cases), together with quark-flavor decompositions and sign-reversal patterns governed by e_u/e_d = -2. Comparison with constituent quark models yields four proposed discriminants: |μ| ≳ 3 μ_N for spin-1/2, sign of μ for [su][uc]c̄ in spin-3/2, non-zero Q (vanishes in S-wave molecules), and the Q-O sign correlation.

Significance. If the central assumption of dominant coupling holds, the work supplies the first Q and O moments for these states, the first flavor decomposition, and concrete, testable signatures that can discriminate pentaquark structures from molecular or quark-model pictures. The explicit numerical predictions and symmetry-based patterns (e.g., charm dominance for scalar currents, flavor sensitivity for axial-vector currents) add falsifiable content to the literature on exotic hadrons.

major comments (2)
  1. The claim that the computed moments furnish four model-discriminating observables rests on the unverified assumption that the six (spin-1/2) and seven (spin-3/2) diquark-diquark-antiquark currents couple dominantly to the physical P^Σ_ψs states with negligible contamination from other resonances or continuum. No quantitative check of pole dominance, residue extraction, or comparison with alternative interpolators is supplied to support this; if the assumption fails, the reported ranges (μ ∈ [-1.92, -1.21] μ_N, Q_0 values, O ≈ -0.25×10^{-3} fm³) and the four discriminants do not apply to the observed states.
  2. In the numerical analysis, the Borel mass parameters and continuum thresholds (free parameters in the light-cone sum rules) are chosen to produce the quoted moment ranges, yet no explicit stability windows, variation plots, or sensitivity analysis are described that would confirm the results are robust rather than tuned to expected mass or decay-constant ranges.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that scalar-diquark currents are 'consistent with heavy-quark spin symmetry'; a brief explicit reference to the relevant heavy-quark limit relations in the introduction would clarify this connection.
  2. Ensure that the claim of 'first computation' for Q and O is accompanied by citations to all prior light-cone or lattice works on pentaquark electromagnetic moments to avoid any perception of overstatement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below, indicating where we agree and how we will strengthen the presentation in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The claim that the computed moments furnish four model-discriminating observables rests on the unverified assumption that the six (spin-1/2) and seven (spin-3/2) diquark-diquark-antiquark currents couple dominantly to the physical P^Σ_ψs states with negligible contamination from other resonances or continuum. No quantitative check of pole dominance, residue extraction, or comparison with alternative interpolators is supplied to support this; if the assumption fails, the reported ranges (μ ∈ [-1.92, -1.21] μ_N, Q_0 values, O ≈ -0.25×10^{-3} fm³) and the four discriminants do not apply to the observed states.

    Authors: We agree that the validity of the reported moment ranges and the four proposed discriminants depends on the assumption of dominant coupling of the chosen interpolating currents to the physical states. This is a standard working hypothesis in light-cone sum-rule analyses of exotic hadrons, where currents are built to match the quantum numbers and diquark configurations under study. We acknowledge that the manuscript does not contain explicit quantitative checks such as pole-dominance ratios or comparisons with alternative interpolators. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph clarifying this assumption, emphasizing that the discriminants are conditional on it, and providing a qualitative estimate of ground-state dominance based on the stability of the sum rules. Full numerical verification would require additional calculations beyond the present scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: In the numerical analysis, the Borel mass parameters and continuum thresholds (free parameters in the light-cone sum rules) are chosen to produce the quoted moment ranges, yet no explicit stability windows, variation plots, or sensitivity analysis are described that would confirm the results are robust rather than tuned to expected mass or decay-constant ranges.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this presentational gap. The Borel windows and continuum thresholds were chosen according to the usual criteria of OPE convergence and ground-state dominance, guided by our prior light-cone sum-rule studies of related hidden-charm pentaquarks. Although the manuscript does not display explicit variation plots, the quoted results remain stable inside the selected intervals. In the revised manuscript we will include supplementary figures showing the dependence of the moments on the Borel parameter and continuum threshold, together with a more detailed discussion of the parameter-selection procedure, to demonstrate robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Borel/continuum parameters tuned to mass sum rules before extracting moments; dominant-coupling assumption for currents is unverified but not self-referential

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Numerical analysis / sum-rule stability section (after Eq. for the LCSR for moments)]
    "The continuum threshold s0 is chosen in the interval ... so that the mass sum rule yields a stable plateau consistent with the experimental mass of P^Σ_ψs; the same Borel window and s0 are then employed to extract the magnetic dipole moment μ and the higher multipoles."

    s0 is adjusted to reproduce the mass (a closely related hadronic parameter), after which the electromagnetic moments are presented as predictions. The moments therefore inherit the tuning that was performed on the mass channel rather than being obtained independently.

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by constructing LCSR for the multipole moments from the chosen diquark-diquark-antiquark currents, performing Borel transformation, and subtracting continuum. The continuum threshold s0 and Borel window are selected so that the auxiliary mass sum rule reproduces the known pentaquark mass; the same window is then used to read off μ, Q, and O. This is a standard but fitted-input step rather than a pure first-principles prediction. No self-citation chain is load-bearing for the final discriminants, and the currents themselves are defined independently of the moments. The assumption of dominant overlap is stated explicitly but not derived, so it does not create definitional circularity. Overall moderate dependence on auxiliary tuning, not full reduction to input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the standard QCD light-cone sum-rule framework, the assumption that the chosen interpolating currents have good overlap with the pentaquark states, and the usual truncation of the operator-product expansion. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Borel mass parameter
    Standard sum-rule parameter whose window is chosen to ensure stability of the extracted moments.
  • Continuum threshold
    Parameter that separates the ground-state contribution from higher states and is typically adjusted within a range.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Validity of QCD light-cone sum rules for exotic multiquark states
    The method is assumed to apply reliably to pentaquarks built from diquark operators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1469 out tokens · 42382 ms · 2026-05-10T15:48:19.082575+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    17 CurrentsJ 1 µ(x),J 2 µ(x),J 3 µ(x), andJ 5 µ(x)couple the diquark system to the charm sector viaΓ 3 =C, a scalar coupling

    Magnetic dipole moments The spin-3/2magnetic moments are uniformly negative and reproduce the same diquark-spin dependence estab- lished in the spin-1/2sector. 17 CurrentsJ 1 µ(x),J 2 µ(x),J 3 µ(x), andJ 5 µ(x)couple the diquark system to the charm sector viaΓ 3 =C, a scalar coupling. Their moments are small (|µ|≲1.2µN), charm-dominated, and flavor-insens...

  2. [2]

    Electric quadrupole moments and intrinsic deformation The electric quadrupole moments are the most structurally informative observable in this work and, to our knowl- edge, constitute the first systematic predictions of this quantity forPΣ∗ ψspentaquarks. No counterpart predictions exist in the molecular or constituent quark model approaches: in the simpl...

  3. [3]

    pert” and “DA

    Magnetic octupole moments The magnetic octupole momentsOare an order of magnitude smaller than the quadrupole moments, as expected from the multipole hierarchy, and constitute new predictions with no molecular or quark model counterpart. They range from−1.42×10−3fm3 (J4 µ(x),[sd][dc]¯c) to+0.56×10−3fm3 (J4 µ(x),[su][uc]¯c). The numerical results of Table ...

  4. [4]

    S. K. Choi, et al., Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusiveB± →K±π+π−J/ψdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262001.arXiv:hep-ex/0309032,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.262001 2003

  5. [5]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. L. Guerrieri, F. Piccinini, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, Four-Quark Hadrons: an Updated Review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1530002.arXiv:1411.5997,doi:10.1142/S0217751X15300021

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x15300021 2015

  6. [6]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, Multiquark Resonances, Phys. Rept. 668 (2017) 1–97.arXiv:1611.07920,doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002 2017

  7. [7]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (1) (2018) 015003.arXiv:1708.04012,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015003

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015003 2018

  8. [8]

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, E. S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93 (2017) 143–194. arXiv:1610.04528,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 2017

  9. [9]

    Nielsen, F

    M. Nielsen, F. S. Navarra, S. H. Lee, New Charmonium States in QCD Sum Rules: A Concise Review, Phys. Rept. 497 (2010) 41–83.arXiv:0911.1958,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.005 2010

  10. [11]

    Agaev, K

    S. Agaev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu, Four-quark exotic mesons, Turk. J. Phys. 44 (2) (2020) 95–173.arXiv:2004.12079, doi:10.3906/fiz-2003-15

    work page doi:10.3906/fiz-2003-15 2020

  11. [12]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639 (2016) 1–121.arXiv:1601.02092,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 2016

  12. [13]

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange, S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97 (2017) 123–198. arXiv:1706.00610,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08.003 2017

  13. [14]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (1) (2018) 015004, [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)].arXiv:1705.00141,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015004 2018

  14. [15]

    Liu, H.-X

    Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Pentaquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107 (2019) 237–320.arXiv:1903.11976,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.003 2019

  15. [16]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, J. Segovia, Tetra- and penta-quark structures in the constituent quark model, Symmetry 12 (11) (2020) 1869.arXiv:2009.00238,doi:10.3390/sym12111869

    work page doi:10.3390/sym12111869 2020

  16. [17]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules, Progr. Phys. 41 (2021) 65–93.arXiv: 2101.01021,doi:10.13725/j.cnki.pip.2021.02.001

    work page doi:10.13725/j.cnki.pip.2021.02.001 2021

  17. [18]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy–heavy hadronic molecules, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (12) (2021) 125201.arXiv:2108.02673,doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac27a2

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac27a2 2021

  18. [19]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2) (2023) 026201.arXiv:2204.02649,doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6 2023

  19. [20]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, S.-L. Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept. 1019 (2023) 1–149.arXiv:2204.08716,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.04.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.04.003 2023

  20. [21]

    Aaij, et al., Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consistent with Pentaquark States inΛ0 b→J/ψK−pDecays, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consistent with Pentaquark States inΛ0 b→J/ψK−pDecays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 072001.arXiv:1507.03414,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.072001 2015

  21. [22]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of thePc(4450)+, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of thePc(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (22) (2019) 222001.arXiv:1904.03947,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.222001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.222001 2019

  22. [23]

    Aaij, et al., Evidence of aJ/ψΛstructure and observation of excitedΞ− states in theΞ− b →J/ψΛK− decay, Sci

    R. Aaij, et al., Evidence of aJ/ψΛstructure and observation of excitedΞ− states in theΞ− b →J/ψΛK− decay, Sci. Bull. 66 (2021) 1278–1287.arXiv:2012.10380,doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.02.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.02.030 2021

  23. [24]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of a J/ψΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B-→J/ψΛp¯Decays, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation of a J/ψΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B-→J/ψΛp¯Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (3) (2023) 031901.arXiv:2210.10346,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.031901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.031901 2023

  24. [25]

    Adachi, et al., Search for Pcs(4459) and Pcs(4338) in Upsilon(1S,2S) inclusive decays at Belle, Phys

    I. Adachi, et al., Search for Pcs(4459) and Pcs(4338) in Upsilon(1S,2S) inclusive decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (4) (2025) 041901.arXiv:2502.09951,doi:10.1103/pf8m-6j69

    work page doi:10.1103/pf8m-6j69 2025

  25. [26]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij, et al., Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II - Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era (8 2018).arXiv:1808.08865

    work page arXiv 2018

  26. [27]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic tomography of spin-3 2 hidden-charm strange pentaquarks, JHEP 02 (2026) 207.arXiv: 2510.26893,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)207

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic tomography of spin-3 2 hidden-charm strange pentaquarks, JHEP 02 (2026) 207.arXiv: 2510.26893,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)207

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2026)207 2026

  27. [28]

    Özdem, Shedding light on the nature of the Pcs(4459) pentaquark state, Phys

    U. Özdem, Shedding light on the nature of the Pcs(4459) pentaquark state, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) (2025) 074038.arXiv: 2411.11442,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074038

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.074038 2025

  28. [29]

    Özdem, Elucidating the nature of hidden-charm pentaquark states with spin-32 through their electromagnetic form factors, Phys

    U. Özdem, Elucidating the nature of hidden-charm pentaquark states with spin-32 through their electromagnetic form factors, Phys. Lett. B 851 (2024) 138551.arXiv:2402.03802,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138551

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138551 2024

  29. [30]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of D¯(∗)Ξc’, D¯(∗)Λc, D¯s(∗)Λc and D¯s(∗)Ξc pentaquarks, Phys

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of D¯(∗)Ξc’, D¯(∗)Λc, D¯s(∗)Λc and D¯s(∗)Ξc pentaquarks, Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138267.arXiv:2303.10649,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138267. 32

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138267 2023

  30. [31]

    Özdem, Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states, Phys

    U. Özdem, Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states, Phys. Lett. B 836 (2023) 137635.arXiv:2208.07684,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137635

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137635 2023

  31. [32]

    G.-J. Wang, R. Chen, L. Ma, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Magnetic moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states, Phys. Rev. D 94 (9) (2016) 094018.arXiv:1605.01337,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.094018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.094018 2016

  32. [33]

    Ortiz-Pacheco, R

    E. Ortiz-Pacheco, R. Bijker, C. Fernández-Ramírez, Hidden charm pentaquarks: mass spectrum, magnetic moments, and photocouplings, J. Phys. G 46 (6) (2019) 065104.arXiv:1808.10512,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab096d

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab096d 2019

  33. [34]

    Xu, Y.-L

    Y.-J. Xu, Y.-L. Liu, M.-Q. Huang, The magnetic moment ofPc(4312)as a ¯DΣc molecular state, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (5) (2021) 421.arXiv:2008.07937,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09211-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09211-8 2021

  34. [35]

    Özdem, K

    U. Özdem, K. Azizi, Electromagnetic multipole moments of theP+ c (4380)pentaquark in light-cone QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (5) (2018) 379.arXiv:1803.06831,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5873-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5873-2 2018

  35. [36]

    Özdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states:Pc(4440),P c(4457)andP cs(4459), Eur

    U. Özdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states:Pc(4440),P c(4457)andP cs(4459), Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (4) (2021) 277.arXiv:2102.01996,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09070-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09070-3 2021

  36. [37]

    Li, Z.-W

    M.-W. Li, Z.-W. Liu, Z.-F. Sun, R. Chen, Magnetic moments and transition magnetic moments of Pc and Pcs states, Phys. Rev. D 104 (5) (2021) 054016.arXiv:2106.15053,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.054016 2021

  37. [38]

    Gao, H.-S

    F. Gao, H.-S. Li, Magnetic moments of hidden-charm strange pentaquark states*, Chin. Phys. C 46 (12) (2022) 123111. arXiv:2112.01823,doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac8651

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac8651 2022

  38. [39]

    Guo, H.-S

    F. Guo, H.-S. Li, Analysis of the hidden-charm pentaquark states based on magnetic moment and transition magnetic moment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (4) (2024) 392.arXiv:2304.10981,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12699-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12699-5 2024

  39. [40]

    Wang, S.-Q

    F.-L. Wang, S.-Q. Luo, H.-Y. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, X. Liu, Exploring the electromagnetic properties of theΞc(’,*)D¯s* and Ωc(*)D¯s*molecularstates, Phys.Rev.D108(3)(2023)034006.arXiv:2210.02809,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.034006 2023

  40. [41]

    Wang, H.-Y

    F.-L. Wang, H.-Y. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, X. Liu, What can we learn from the electromagnetic properties of hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks with single strangeness?, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) (2022) 054020.arXiv:2208.10756,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.054020

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [42]

    Özdem, Analysis of the isospin eigenstate¯DΣc, ¯D∗Σc, and ¯DΣ ∗ c pentaquarks by their electromagnetic properties, Eur

    U. Özdem, Analysis of the isospin eigenstate¯DΣc, ¯D∗Σc, and ¯DΣ ∗ c pentaquarks by their electromagnetic properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (8) (2024) 769.arXiv:2401.12678,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13124-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13124-7 2024

  42. [43]

    H.-S. Li, F. Guo, Y.-D. Lei, F. Gao, Magnetic moments and axial charges of the octet hidden-charm molecular pentaquark family, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) (2024) 094027.arXiv:2401.14767,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.094027 2024

  43. [44]

    Li, Molecular pentaquark magnetic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, Phys

    H.-S. Li, Molecular pentaquark magnetic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) (2024) 114039.arXiv:2401.14759,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114039

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.114039 2024

  44. [45]

    Mutuk, X.-W

    H. Mutuk, X.-W. Kang, Unveiling the structure of hidden-bottom strange pentaquarks via magnetic moments, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138772.arXiv:2405.07066,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138772

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138772 2024

  45. [46]

    Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-bottom pentaquark states, Eur

    H. Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-bottom pentaquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (8) (2024) 874.arXiv:2403.16616, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13263-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13263-x 2024

  46. [47]

    Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-charm pentaquarks in the diquark–diquark–antiquark scheme, Chin

    H. Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-charm pentaquarks in the diquark–diquark–antiquark scheme, Chin. J. Phys. 97 (2025) 1406–1414.arXiv:2411.16486,doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2025.07.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2025.07.030 2025

  47. [48]

    Özdem, Insight into the nature of thePc(4457)and related pentaquarks, Eur

    U. Özdem, Insight into the nature of thePc(4457)and related pentaquarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (6) (2025) 624.arXiv: 2409.09449,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14323-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14323-6 2025

  48. [49]

    DOI 10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10942-5

    U. Özdem, Probing the electromagnetic structure of thePc(4337)+ pentaquark: insights from a diquark–diquark–antiquark picture forJ P = 1 2 − and 3 2 − states, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (6) (2025) 704.arXiv:2506.04345,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-14439-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2025

  49. [50]

    S.-H.Zhu, F.-L.Wang, X.Liu, ElectromagneticcharacteristicsasprobesintotheinnerstructuresofthepredictedΞ (′,∗) c D(∗) s molecular states (10 2025).arXiv:2510.18492

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [51]

    Özdem, Hidden-charm pentaquarks: electromagnetic structure in a diquark–diquark–antiquark model, Eur

    U. Özdem, Hidden-charm pentaquarks: electromagnetic structure in a diquark–diquark–antiquark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (4) (2026) 359.arXiv:2603.19151,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15591-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15591-6 2026

  51. [52]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic form factors: A window into theDΛc,D ∗Λc, andDΛ ∗ c molecular structure (11 2025).arXiv: 2511.16052

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic form factors: A window into theDΛc,D ∗Λc, andDΛ ∗ c molecular structure (11 2025).arXiv: 2511.16052

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    Mutuk, X.-W

    H. Mutuk, X.-W. Kang, Magnetic moments of open bottom–charm molecular pentaquark octets (3 2026).arXiv:2603. 27657

    2026

  53. [54]

    Li, Axial charges and magnetic moments of the decuplet pentaquark family, Phys

    H.-S. Li, Axial charges and magnetic moments of the decuplet pentaquark family, Phys. Rev. D 113 (5) (2026) 056017. arXiv:2511.12858,doi:10.1103/32n9-j3pp

    work page doi:10.1103/32n9-j3pp 2026

  54. [55]

    V. L. Chernyak, I. R. Zhitnitsky, B meson exclusive decays into baryons, Nucl. Phys. B 345 (1990) 137–172.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(90)90612-H

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90612-h 1990

  55. [56]

    V. M. Braun, I. E. Filyanov, QCD Sum Rules in Exclusive Kinematics and Pion Wave Function, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 157. doi:10.1007/BF01548594

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01548594 1989

  56. [57]

    I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, A. V. Kolesnichenko, Radiative Decay Sigma+ —>p gamma in Quantum Chromodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 312 (1989) 509–550.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90570-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90570-1 1989

  57. [58]

    Wang, Analysis of the scalar and axial-vector heavy diquark states with QCD sum rules, Eur

    Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the scalar and axial-vector heavy diquark states with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1524.arXiv:1008.4449,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1524-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1524-y 2011

  58. [59]

    R. T. Kleiv, T. G. Steele, A. Zhang, I. Blokland, Heavy-light diquark masses from QCD sum rules and constituent diquark models of tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 87 (12) (2013) 125018.arXiv:1304.7816,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.125018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.125018 2013

  59. [60]

    P. Ball, V. M. Braun, N. Kivel, Photon distribution amplitudes in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 649 (2003) 263–296.arXiv: hep-ph/0207307,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)01017-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)01017-9 2003

  60. [61]

    V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, V. I. Zakharov, Calculations in External Fields in Quantum Chromody- 33 namics. Technical Review, Fortsch. Phys. 32 (1984) 585

    1984

  61. [62]

    B. L. Ioffe, A. V. Smilga, Nucleon Magnetic Moments and Magnetic Properties of Vacuum in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 232 (1984) 109–142.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90364-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90364-x 1984

  62. [63]

    I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, Evolution Equations for QCD String Operators, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1989) 541–584.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(89)90168-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90168-5 1989

  63. [64]

    V. M. Belyaev, B. Y. Blok, CHARMED BARYONS IN QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS, Z. Phys. C 30 (1986) 151. doi:10.1007/BF01560689

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01560689 1986

  64. [65]

    D. B. Leinweber, R. M. Woloshyn, T. Draper, Electromagnetic structure of octet baryons, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 1659– 1678.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.1659

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.1659 1991

  65. [66]

    Z.-G. Wang, Y. Liu, Analysis of the hidden-charm pentaquark candidates in theJ/ψΣmass spectrum via the QCD sum rules (3 2026).arXiv:2603.10774

    work page arXiv 2026

  66. [67]

    Nozawa, D

    S. Nozawa, D. B. Leinweber, Electromagnetic form-factors of spin 3/2 baryons, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3567–3571. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3567

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.3567 1990

  67. [68]

    Pascalutsa, M

    V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen, S. N. Yang, Electromagnetic excitation of the Delta(1232)-resonance, Phys. Rept. 437 (2007) 125–232.arXiv:hep-ph/0609004,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.006 2007

  68. [69]

    Ramalho, M

    G. Ramalho, M. T. Pena, F. Gross, Electric quadrupole and magnetic octupole moments of the Delta, Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 355–358.arXiv:0902.4212,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.06.052

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.06.052 2009

  69. [70]

    V. M. Belyaev, B. L. Ioffe, Determination of the baryon mass and baryon resonances from the quantum-chromodynamics sum rule. Strange baryons, Sov. Phys. JETP 57 (1983) 716–721

    1983

  70. [71]

    V. M. Belyaev, Delta - isobar magnetic form-factor in QCD (1 1993).arXiv:hep-ph/9301257

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1993

  71. [72]

    Review of particle physics

    S. Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  72. [73]

    B. L. Ioffe, QCD at low energies, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 56 (2006) 232–277.arXiv:hep-ph/0502148,doi:10.1016/j. ppnp.2005.05.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2006

  73. [74]

    Narison, mc,b, < αsG2 >andα s from Heavy Quarkonia, Nucl

    S. Narison, mc,b, < αsG2 >andα s from Heavy Quarkonia, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 300-302 (2018) 153–164.doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2018.12.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2018.12.026 2018

  74. [75]

    J. Rohrwild, Determination of the magnetic susceptibility of the quark condensate using radiative heavy meson decays, JHEP 09 (2007) 073.arXiv:0708.1405,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/073

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/073 2007

  75. [76]

    A. J. Buchmann, E. M. Henley, Intrinsic quadrupole moment of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001) 015202.arXiv: hep-ph/0101027,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.015202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.63.015202 2001

  76. [77]

    Electromagnetic form factors and structure of the $T_{bb}$ tetraquark from lattice QCD

    I. Vujmilovic, S. Collins, L. Leskovec, S. Prelovsek, Electromagnetic form factors and structure of theTbb tetraquark from lattice QCD (10 2025).arXiv:2510.17549

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [78]

    V. I. Zakharov, L. A. Kondratyuk, L. A. Ponomarev, Bremsstrahlung and determination of electromagnetic parameters of particles, Yad. Fiz. 8 (1968) 783–792

    1968

  78. [79]

    Pascalutsa, M

    V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen, Magnetic moment of the Delta(1232)-resonance in chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 102003.arXiv:nucl-th/0412113,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.102003 2005

  79. [80]

    Pascalutsa, M

    V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen, Chiral effective-field theory in the Delta(1232) region: I. Pion electroproduction on the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 034003.arXiv:hep-ph/0512244,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.034003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.034003 2006

  80. [81]

    Pascalutsa, M

    V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen, Chiral effective-field theory in the Delta(1232) region. II. Radiative pion photoproduc- tion, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 014027.arXiv:0709.4583,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.014027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.014027 2008

Showing first 80 references.