pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12613 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to photon-pair production

Michal Czakon , Felix Eschment , Terry Generet , Rene Poncelet
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords QCD correctionsN3LOphoton pair productiondiphoton productionperturbative convergencehadron collisionsLHC phenomenologyhigher-order calculations
0
0 comments X

The pith

N³LO QCD corrections to photon-pair production establish perturbative convergence

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order corrections in QCD to the production of two isolated photons in high-energy hadron collisions. Earlier orders up to NNLO exhibited large corrections that left predictions uncertain for collider experiments. By reaching N³LO the authors show that the size of the corrections decreases, demonstrating that the perturbative series is converging for this process. This matters because accurate theory is required to interpret data and to treat the process as a background in other measurements. The work also covers the major computational difficulties that had to be solved to obtain the result.

Core claim

We present novel N³LO predictions for the production of two isolated photons in high-energy hadron collisions and finally demonstrate perturbative convergence for this process, after discussing the computational challenges and providing phenomenological results for the LHC.

What carries the argument

The N³LO QCD calculation for isolated photon-pair production, which includes three-loop virtual corrections and real-emission contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The N³LO corrections have been computed completely without missing pieces and the reduction in their magnitude reliably signals perturbative convergence at LHC energies.

What would settle it

A precise LHC measurement of the diphoton production cross section or distributions that falls outside the N³LO theoretical uncertainty band.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12613 by Felix Eschment, Michal Czakon, Rene Poncelet, Terry Generet.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Distribution of the number of corrects digits for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The left plot shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The invariant-mass distribution of the photon pair [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The production of two isolated photons in high-energy hadron collisions poses a challenge to perturbative QCD because of large corrections through next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO). We present novel next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order ($\text{N}^3$LO) predictions and finally demonstrate perturbative convergence for this process. We discuss the considerable computational challenges and phenomenological results for the Large Hadron Collider.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the N³LO QCD corrections to isolated photon-pair production in hadron collisions. It addresses the substantial technical challenges of combining two-loop virtual, three-loop virtual, double-real and real-virtual contributions with infrared subtraction, presents LHC phenomenology, and claims that the N³LO terms finally establish perturbative convergence for this process at collider energies.

Significance. If the central computation is correct, this constitutes a significant advance for precision QCD phenomenology. Diphoton production is both a standard candle and an important background; reducing the perturbative uncertainty to the few-percent level at N³LO would directly benefit Higgs analyses and new-physics searches at the LHC. The explicit validation against known NNLO results and limiting cases is a positive feature of the work.

major comments (2)
  1. §4 (numerical results): the demonstration of perturbative convergence rests on the observed reduction in the size of the N³LO correction relative to NNLO. However, the paper does not quantify the residual scale dependence at N³LO for the fiducial cross section or for the differential distributions; without this, the claim that convergence has been achieved remains qualitative rather than quantitative.
  2. §3.2 (infrared subtraction): the construction of the subtraction terms for the double-real and real-virtual contributions is described at a high level. A more explicit statement of how the N³LO subtraction operators reduce to the known NNLO operators in the appropriate limits would strengthen the internal consistency check.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract contains an awkward phrasing ('finally demonstrate'); a clearer statement of the main phenomenological conclusion would improve readability.
  2. Figure 5 (differential distributions): the legend and axis labels are too small for comfortable reading in the printed version; increasing font size or splitting the figure would help.
  3. A short table summarizing the individual contributions (virtual, real-virtual, double-real) at N³LO would make the numerical breakdown more transparent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (numerical results): the demonstration of perturbative convergence rests on the observed reduction in the size of the N³LO correction relative to NNLO. However, the paper does not quantify the residual scale dependence at N³LO for the fiducial cross section or for the differential distributions; without this, the claim that convergence has been achieved remains qualitative rather than quantitative.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative measure of the residual scale dependence at N³LO would make the demonstration of perturbative convergence more robust. In the revised manuscript we will add the N³LO scale-variation bands (both for the fiducial cross section and for the differential distributions shown in §4), allowing a direct, order-by-order comparison of the perturbative uncertainties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3.2 (infrared subtraction): the construction of the subtraction terms for the double-real and real-virtual contributions is described at a high level. A more explicit statement of how the N³LO subtraction operators reduce to the known NNLO operators in the appropriate limits would strengthen the internal consistency check.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. To strengthen the internal consistency checks we will expand §3.2 with an explicit discussion (including the relevant limiting expressions) showing how the N³LO subtraction operators reduce to the known NNLO operators in the appropriate limits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct perturbative computation

full rationale

The paper computes N³LO QCD corrections to diphoton production via explicit evaluation of two-loop virtual, three-loop virtual, double-real, and real-virtual contributions with IR subtraction. The central claim (novel N³LO predictions demonstrating perturbative convergence) follows from these diagram-level calculations and numerical integration, cross-checked against known NNLO results and limits. No load-bearing step reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks such as lower-order analytic results and LHC data comparisons.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review limited to abstract; no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are described beyond the standard perturbative QCD framework.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Perturbative expansion in the strong coupling is valid and convergent at N³LO for this process
    Invoked implicitly by the claim of demonstrated convergence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5356 in / 1047 out tokens · 38715 ms · 2026-05-10T15:19:51.189741+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Numerically, find linear relations between rational coefficients and use them to eliminate coefficients where the numerator has a large mass dimension

  2. [2]

    Since they do not directly correspond to infrared limits, poles in these variables are spurious and have to cancel be- tween terms in the amplitude

    Study relations between coefficients in the limits ⟨i|j+k|l]→0 or ∆ ij|kl|mn →0. Since they do not directly correspond to infrared limits, poles in these variables are spurious and have to cancel be- tween terms in the amplitude. This can be used to obtain leading-pole contributions to complicated coefficients from terms that are easier to obtain

  3. [3]

    Valid partial-fraction decompositions can be obtained fromp-adic probes on varieties associated to codimension-two prime ideals

    Apply partial fractioning to the remaining coeffi- cients. Valid partial-fraction decompositions can be obtained fromp-adic probes on varieties associated to codimension-two prime ideals. We use six-point primary decompositions provided in Appendix B of Ref. [105]. For a more detailed description of the reconstruction pro- cedure used in this calculation,...

  4. [4]

    Since we constantly evaluate the amplitude in infrared phase-space regions, we find that double precision is usually insufficient

    From the difference between the expected and ob- tained rescaled amplitude values, we can estimate the number of correct digits. Since we constantly evaluate the amplitude in infrared phase-space regions, we find that double precision is usually insufficient. Therefore, we use quadruple precision by default. As shown in Fig. 1, this yields more than 15 co...

    2021

  5. [5]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, T

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, and E. W. N. Glover, Antenna subtraction at NNLO, JHEP09, 056, arXiv:hep-ph/0505111

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Somogyi and Z

    G. Somogyi and Z. Trocsanyi, A New subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at next-to- leading order accuracy (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0609041

    work page arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Czakon,A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO,Phys

    M. Czakon, A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO, Phys. Lett. B693, 259 (2010), arXiv:1005.0274 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    Caola, K

    F. Caola, K. Melnikov, and R. R¨ ontsch, Nested soft- collinear subtractions in NNLO QCD computations, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 248 (2017), arXiv:1702.01352 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Magnea, E

    L. Magnea, E. Maina, G. Pelliccioli, C. Signorile- Signorile, P. Torrielli, and S. Uccirati, Local analytic sector subtraction at NNLO, JHEP12, 107, [Erratum: JHEP 06, 013 (2019)], arXiv:1806.09570 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. L. Czakon, A. Mitov, and R. Pon- celet, NNLO QCD corrections to three-photon produc- tion at the LHC, JHEP02, 057, arXiv:1911.00479 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 1911

  11. [11]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov, and R. Pon- celet, NNLO QCD corrections to diphoton production with an additional jet at the LHC, JHEP09, 093, arXiv:2105.06940 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Czakon, A

    M. Czakon, A. Mitov, and R. Poncelet, Next-to-Next- to-Leading Order Study of Three-Jet Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 152001 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 129, 119901 (2022)], arXiv:2106.05331 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss, and M. Marcoli, Automation of antenna subtraction in colour space: gluonic processes, JHEP10, 099, arXiv:2203.13531 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, A. Popescu, and S. Zoia, Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to Wbb¯production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D106, 074016 (2022), arXiv:2205.01687 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Alvarez, et al.,NNLO QCD corrections to event shapes at the LHC,JHEP03 (2023) 129, [arXiv:2301.01086]

    M. Alvarez, J. Cantero, M. Czakon, J. Llorente, A. Mi- tov, and R. Poncelet, NNLO QCD corrections to event shapes at the LHC, JHEP03, 129, arXiv:2301.01086 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Badger, et al.,Isolated photon production in association with a jet pair through next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD,JHEP10(2023) 071, [arXiv:2304.06682]

    S. Badger, M. Czakon, H. B. Hartanto, R. Moodie, T. Peraro, R. Poncelet, and S. Zoia, Isolated pho- ton production in association with a jet pair through next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, JHEP10, 071, arXiv:2304.06682 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Buccioni, X

    F. Buccioni, X. Chen, W.-J. Feng, T. Gehrmann, A. Huss, and M. Marcoli, Precise Predictions for Event Shapes in Diphoton Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 171901 (2025), arXiv:2501.14021 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Badger, C

    S. Badger, C. Brancaccio, M. Becchetti, M. Czakon, H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, and S. Zoia, Higher-order QCD corrections to top-quark pair production in asso- ciation with a jet (2025), arXiv:2511.11431 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Czakon and D

    M. Czakon and D. Heymes, Four-dimensional formula- tion of the sector-improved residue subtraction scheme, Nucl. Phys. B890, 152 (2014), arXiv:1408.2500 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Czakon, A

    M. Czakon, A. van Hameren, A. Mitov, and R. Poncelet, Single-jet inclusive rates with exact color atO(α 4 s), JHEP10, 262, arXiv:1907.12911 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1907

  21. [21]

    NNLOJET: a parton-level event generator for jet cross sections at NNLO QCD accuracy

    A. Husset al.(NNLOJET), NNLOJET: a parton-level event generator for jet cross sections at NNLO QCD accuracy (2025), arXiv:2503.22804 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Daleo, T

    A. Daleo, T. Gehrmann, and D. Maitre, Antenna sub- traction with hadronic initial states, JHEP04, 016, arXiv:hep-ph/0612257

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Currie, E

    J. Currie, E. W. N. Glover, and S. Wells, Infrared Struc- ture at NNLO Using Antenna Subtraction, JHEP04, 066, arXiv:1301.4693 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, L. Fekeshazy, F. Guadagni, P. Mukherjee, G. Somogyi, F. Tramontano, and S. Van Thurenhout, NNLOCAL: completely local sub- tractions for color-singlet production in hadron colli- sions, JHEP05, 151, arXiv:2412.21028 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, A. Kardos, G. Somogyi, Z. Sz˝ or, Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi, and Z. Tulip´ ant, Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron- positron collisions, Phys. Rev. D94, 074019 (2016), arXiv:1606.03453 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    S. Y. Klein and L. Simon, history: A tool for fully- differential cross sections at next-to-next-to-leading or- der (2026), arXiv:2603.13729 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Caola, K

    F. Caola, K. Melnikov, and R. R¨ ontsch, Analytic results for color-singlet production at NNLO QCD with the nested soft-collinear subtraction scheme, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 386 (2019), arXiv:1902.02081 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    X. Chen, P. Jakubˇ c´ ık, M. Marcoli, and G. Stagnitto, Jet production at electron-positron colliders at next- to-next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 869, 139804 (2025), arXiv:2505.10618 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Anastasiou and K

    C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B646, 220 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0207004

    work page arXiv 2002

  30. [30]

    Anastasiou and K

    C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, Pseudoscalar Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Phys. Rev. D67, 037501 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0208115

    work page arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    Anastasiou, C

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog, and B. Mistlberger, Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 212001 (2015), arXiv:1503.06056 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Anastasiou et al., High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC, JHEP05(2016) 058, arXiv:1602.00695 [hep-ph]

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog, A. Lazopoulos, and B. Mistl- berger, High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC, JHEP05, 058, arXiv:1602.00695 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Mistlberger, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD, JHEP05, 028, arXiv:1802.00833 [hep-ph]

    B. Mistlberger, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD, JHEP05, 028, arXiv:1802.00833 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and B. Mistlberger, Higgs Boson Production in Bottom-Quark Fusion to Third Order in the Strong Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 051804 (2020), arXiv:1904.09990 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and B. Mistlberger, Drell-Yan Cross Section to Third Order in the Strong Cou- pling Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 172001 (2020), arXiv:2001.07717 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and B. Mistlberger, Charged cur- rent Drell-Yan production at N 3LO, JHEP11, 143, arXiv:2007.13313 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Baglio, C

    J. Baglio, C. Duhr, B. Mistlberger, and R. Szafron, In- clusive production cross sections at N 3LO, JHEP12, 066, arXiv:2209.06138 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Cacciari, F.A

    M. Cacciari, F. A. Dreyer, A. Karlberg, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi, Fully Differential Vector-Boson- 7 Fusion Higgs Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 082002 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 139901 (2018)], arXiv:1506.02660 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss, B. Mistlberger, and A. Pelloni, Fully Differential Higgs Boson Production to Third Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 072002 (2021), arXiv:2102.07607 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Production at Three Loops in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 072001 (2016), arXiv:1606.00840 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Pair Production at N 3LO, Phys. Rev. D98, 114016 (2018), arXiv:1811.07906 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, An NNLO subtraction for- malism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 222002 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0703012

    work page arXiv 2007

  43. [43]

    Cieri, X

    L. Cieri, X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, and A. Huss, Higgs boson production at the LHC using the qT subtraction formalism at N3LO QCD, JHEP02, 096, arXiv:1807.11501 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Billis, B

    G. Billis, B. Dehnadi, M. A. Ebert, J. K. L. Michel, and F. J. Tackmann, Higgs pT Spectrum and Total Cross Section with Fiducial Cuts at Third Resummed and Fixed Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 072001 (2021), arXiv:2102.08039 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Camarda, L

    S. Camarda, L. Cieri, and G. Ferrera, Drell–Yan lepton- pair production: qT resummation at N3LL accuracy and fiducial cross sections at N3LO, Phys. Rev. D104, L111503 (2021), arXiv:2103.04974 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, A. Huss, T.-Z. Yang, and H. X. Zhu, Dilepton Rapidity Distribution in Drell- Yan Production to Third Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 052001 (2022), arXiv:2107.09085 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Camarda, L

    S. Camarda, L. Cieri, and G. Ferrera, Fiducial perturba- tive power corrections within theqT subtraction formal- ism, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 575 (2022), arXiv:2111.14509 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss, P. F. Monni, E. Re, L. Rottoli, and P. Torrielli, Third- Order Fiducial Predictions for Drell-Yan Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 252001 (2022), arXiv:2203.01565 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, A. Huss, T.-Z. Yang, and H. X. Zhu, Transverse mass distribution and charge asymmetry in W boson production to third order in QCD, Phys. Lett. B840, 137876 (2023), arXiv:2205.11426 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Neumann and J

    T. Neumann and J. Campbell, Fiducial Drell-Yan pro- duction at the LHC improved by transverse-momentum resummation at N4LLp+N3LO, Phys. Rev. D107, L011506 (2023), arXiv:2207.07056 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Campbell and T

    J. Campbell and T. Neumann, Third order QCD predic- tions for fiducial W-boson production, JHEP11, 127, arXiv:2308.15382 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Buonocore, M

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, J. Haag, L. Rottoli, and C. Savoini, Effective transverse momentum in multiple jet production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D106, 014008 (2022), arXiv:2201.11519 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Buonocore, M

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, J. Haag, L. Rottoli, and C. Savoini, Exploring slicing variables for jet processes, JHEP12, 193, arXiv:2307.11570 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    R.-J. Fu, R. Rahn, D. Y. Shao, W. J. Waalewijn, and B. Wu, qT Slicing with Multiple Jets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 171903 (2025), arXiv:2412.05358 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Buonocore, M

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, F. Guadagni, J. Haag, S. Kallweit, and L. Rottoli, Jet Production at NNLO: Exploring a New Scheme (2025), arXiv:2512.03954 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Boughezal, C

    R. Boughezal, C. Focke, X. Liu, and F. Petriello,W- boson production in association with a jet at next-to- next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 062002 (2015), arXiv:1504.02131 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    Gaunt, M

    J. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen, F. J. Tackmann, and J. R. Walsh, N-jettiness Subtractions for NNLO QCD Calcu- lations, JHEP09, 058, arXiv:1505.04794 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    M. A. Ebert, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita,N- jettiness beam functions at N 3LO, JHEP09, 143, arXiv:2006.03056 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Baranowski, A

    D. Baranowski, A. Behring, K. Melnikov, L. Tancredi, and C. Wever, Beam functions for N-jettiness at N 3LO in perturbative QCD, JHEP02, 073, arXiv:2211.05722 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    Br¨ user, Z

    R. Br¨ user, Z. L. Liu, and M. Stahlhofen, Three-Loop Quark Jet Function, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 072003 (2018), arXiv:1804.09722 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Banerjee, P

    P. Banerjee, P. K. Dhani, and V. Ravindran, Gluon jet function at three loops in QCD, Phys. Rev. D98, 094016 (2018), arXiv:1805.02637 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    Baranowski, M

    D. Baranowski, M. Delto, K. Melnikov, A. Pikelner, and C.-Y. Wang, Zero-Jettiness Soft Function to Third Or- der in Perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 191902 (2025), arXiv:2409.11042 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Baranowski, M

    D. Baranowski, M. Delto, K. Melnikov, A. Pikelner, and C.-Y. Wang, Triple real-emission contribution to the zero-jettiness soft function at N3LO in QCD, JHEP 04, 084, arXiv:2412.14001 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716, 1 (2012), arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Observation of a New Bo- son at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716, 30 (2012), arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the production cross section of pairs of isolated photons inppcollisions at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11, 169, arXiv:2107.09330 [hep-ex]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the production cross section of pairs of isolated photons inppcollisions at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11, 169, arXiv:2107.09330 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of Differen- tial Cross Sections for the Production of a Pair of Iso- lated Photons in pp Collisions at √s= 7 TeV, Eur

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of Differen- tial Cross Sections for the Production of a Pair of Iso- lated Photons in pp Collisions at √s= 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C74, 3129 (2014), arXiv:1405.7225 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Catani, L

    S. Catani, L. Cieri, D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, and M. Grazzini, Diphoton production at hadron colliders: a fully-differential QCD calculation at NNLO, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 072001 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 089901 (2016)], arXiv:1110.2375 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  69. [69]

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, Y. Li, and C. Williams, Pre- dictions for diphoton production at the LHC through NNLO in QCD, JHEP07, 148, arXiv:1603.02663 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Trans- verse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production, Nucl. Phys. B250, 199 (1985). 8

    1985

  71. [71]

    Bozzi, S

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian, and M. Grazzini, Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B737, 73 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0508068

    work page arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert, Drell-Yan Production at Smallq T , Transverse Parton Distributions and the Collinear Anomaly, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1665 (2011), arXiv:1007.4005 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  73. [73]

    M. G. Echevarria, A. Idilbi, and I. Scimemi, Factoriza- tion Theorem For Drell-Yan At Lowq T And Transverse Momentum Distributions On-The-Light-Cone, JHEP 07, 002, arXiv:1111.4996 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein, A Formalism for the Systematic Treatment of Rapidity Logarithms in Quantum Field Theory, JHEP05, 084, arXiv:1202.0814 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    M. A. Ebert, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita, Transverse momentum dependent PDFs at N 3LO, JHEP09, 146, arXiv:2006.05329 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  76. [76]

    Luo, T.-Z

    M.-x. Luo, T.-Z. Yang, H. X. Zhu, and Y. J. Zhu, Unpo- larized quark and gluon TMD PDFs and FFs at N 3LO, JHEP06, 115, arXiv:2012.03256 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  77. [77]

    E. W. N. Glover and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Two loop QCD helicity amplitudes for massless quark mass- less gauge boson scattering, JHEP06, 033, arXiv:hep- ph/0304169

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Von Manteuffel, and L. Tancredi, Diphoton Amplitudes in Three-Loop Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 112004 (2021), arXiv:2011.13946 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Y. Hida, X. S. Li, and D. H. Bailey, Algorithms for quad-double precision floating point arithmetic, Pro- ceedings 15th IEEE Symposium on Computer Arith- metic. ARITH-15 2001 , 155 (2000)

    2001

  80. [80]

    van Hameren, avhlib,https://bitbucket.org/ hameren/avhlib

    A. van Hameren, avhlib,https://bitbucket.org/ hameren/avhlib

Showing first 80 references.