arxiv: 2604.13167 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

N-Jettiness Soft Functions Made Simple

Luca Buonocore , Maximilian Delto , Kirill Melnikov , Pier Francesco Monni , Andrey Pikelner , Gherardo Vita

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords N-jettinesssoft functionsQCDNNLOdipole contributionsinfrared singularitiesmulti-jet processes

0 comments

The pith

The dipole contribution to the N-jettiness soft function equals an inclusive soft function plus a remainder that vanishes at NLO and stays finite at NNLO.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a method to compute soft functions for the N-jettiness variable in QCD at high perturbative orders. The central step is to write the leading singular dipole part as an analytically known inclusive soft function plus a remainder term. That remainder is absent at NLO, finite at NNLO, and can be subtracted with NLO-style counterterms at N3LO. The approach therefore lets physicists evaluate these functions numerically for several jets while avoiding the full set of infrared divergences at each order. Precision predictions for multi-jet processes at hadron colliders gain from the resulting NNLO results and the outlined route to N3LO.

Core claim

The most singular part of the soft function, the dipole contribution, can be represented by a sum of an analytically calculable inclusive soft function and a remainder. The latter is absent at NLO, is immediately finite at NNLO and can be made finite with the help of simple NLO-like infrared subtractions at N3LO. As a byproduct, this yields a very simple formula for the tripole contribution to the NNLO soft function, which permits fast numerical evaluation.

What carries the argument

Decomposition of the dipole contribution into an inclusive soft function plus remainder term, isolating leading singularities analytically.

If this is right

The NNLO N-jettiness soft function becomes computable for arbitrary numbers of jets.
A closed-form tripole contribution at NNLO appears that evaluates quickly.
Numerical values are obtained for the hadron-collider soft function with up to five jets.
A concrete path to N3LO opens by applying only NLO-like infrared subtractions to the remainder.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same split between inclusive and remainder pieces could apply to soft functions for other global observables that share similar dipole singularities.
Fast evaluation of the tripole term may simplify color-correlation studies in other NNLO multi-parton calculations.
The method lowers the cost of generating NNLO predictions for processes measured with N-jettiness cuts at the LHC.

Load-bearing premise

The dipole terms capture every leading infrared singularity so the remainder contains no new divergences that resist NLO-style subtractions at N3LO.

What would settle it

An explicit NNLO calculation of the remainder term for a two-jet configuration that reveals uncancelled infrared poles beyond those subtracted by the inclusive part would disprove the finiteness claim.

read the original abstract

We present a new method to compute the soft function for the $N$-Jettiness variable for arbitrary $N$ at high perturbative orders in QCD. It is based on the observation that the most singular part of the soft function, the dipole contribution, can be represented by a sum of an analytically calculable inclusive soft function and a remainder. The latter is absent at NLO, is immediately finite at NNLO and can be made finite with the help of simple NLO-like infrared subtractions at N$^3$LO. As a byproduct of this approach, we derive a very simple formula for the tripole contribution to the $N$-Jettiness NNLO soft function, which results in a fast numerical evaluation. We apply this method to compute the $N$-Jettiness soft function at NNLO, and report numerical results for up to five jets for the hadron-collider soft function. We finally outline the prospects for applications at N$^3$LO.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The decomposition of the dipole into inclusive plus remainder plus the compact tripole formula at NNLO make N-jettiness soft functions easier to compute for several jets, though the N3LO sketch needs explicit checks.

read the letter

This paper introduces a method to compute the N-jettiness soft function at higher orders by decomposing the dipole contribution into an inclusive soft function that can be calculated analytically and a remainder term. The remainder is zero at NLO, finite right away at NNLO, and they say it can be rendered finite at N3LO using straightforward NLO-like infrared subtractions. They also derive a simple formula for the tripole part at NNLO that works for any number of jets and allows quick numerical computation. What stands out is how this makes the calculation more manageable for multiple jets. They provide numerical results for the hadron-collider soft function with up to five jets at NNLO. This kind of advance matters for reducing theoretical errors in LHC measurements involving several jets, like in precision studies of jet production or event shapes. The approach relies on known inclusive soft functions and standard factorization, so no circularity there. The tripole formula is presented as new and compact, which is a plus for practical use. On the downside, the N3LO prospects are just sketched without detailed pole cancellation demonstrations for the remainder at that order. The stress-test note points out that triple-real emissions could introduce tripole and quadrupole terms whose divergences might not be fully subtracted by the proposed NLO operators. If the paper includes explicit verification that all 1/ε poles cancel, that would address the issue; from the abstract alone it's not clear. The soundness is moderate because we lack the full derivations and plots here, but the logic seems consistent with QCD. Overall, this is aimed at experts in perturbative QCD who need efficient ways to handle soft functions in multi-jet processes. Someone focused on resummation or fixed-order calculations for collider observables would find the decomposition and the numerical results worthwhile. It has enough concrete content and relevance to warrant a full referee process rather than a desk reject. I think the editors should send it out for review.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a method to compute N-jettiness soft functions for arbitrary N at high orders in QCD. The dipole contribution is decomposed as an analytically calculable inclusive soft function plus a remainder term; the remainder vanishes at NLO, is finite at NNLO, and is rendered finite at N3LO via NLO-like infrared subtractions. A compact formula for the NNLO tripole term is derived, enabling fast numerics. Numerical NNLO results are reported for the hadron-collider soft function with up to five jets, and prospects for N3LO are outlined.

Significance. If the decomposition and finiteness claims hold, the approach provides a practical route to higher-order soft functions without introducing free parameters or ad-hoc fits, leveraging only standard QCD factorization and known inclusive results. The explicit NNLO tripole formula and numerical values up to five jets constitute a concrete, reusable advance for multi-jet resummation and fixed-order phenomenology at hadron colliders. The method's simplicity at NNLO is a clear strength.

minor comments (2)

[Prospects section] Prospects section: the statement that NLO-like subtractions suffice to cancel all new divergences in the remainder at N3LO is presented as an outline only; adding a brief explicit example of the subtraction operator applied to a triple-real emission term would clarify the procedure without altering the main NNLO results.
[Numerical results] Numerical results: while values up to five jets are reported, a compact table listing the soft-function coefficients (or their integrals) for each N would make the results more immediately usable and allow direct comparison with future calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and for recommending minor revision. The referee summary correctly identifies the core of our approach: the decomposition of the most singular dipole term into an analytically known inclusive soft function plus a remainder that vanishes at NLO, is finite at NNLO, and can be subtracted at N3LO using NLO-like counterterms. We also appreciate the recognition of the compact NNLO tripole formula and the numerical results up to five jets. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: decomposition and NNLO formula are independent derivations

full rationale

The paper decomposes the dipole soft function as S_incl (known analytic inclusive result) + remainder R, with R absent at NLO and finite at NNLO by direct inspection of the singularity structure. The byproduct tripole formula at NNLO is obtained by explicit integration of the relevant matrix elements, not by fitting or redefinition. No parameters are extracted from data inside the paper, no uniqueness theorems are imported via self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The method relies on standard QCD factorization and known inclusive soft functions as external inputs; numerical results for up to five jets are computed directly from the remainder. The N3LO outline is prospective and does not affect the NNLO derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method relies on established perturbative QCD factorization theorems and infrared safety of the N-jettiness observable; no new free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or non-standard axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard QCD perturbative expansion and infrared factorization theorems for soft functions hold.
The decomposition presupposes that the soft function admits a perturbative expansion and that its leading singularities are captured by dipole terms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 1331 out tokens · 42295 ms · 2026-05-10T14:36:45.299034+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

[1]

Anastasiou et al., High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC, JHEP05(2016) 058, arXiv:1602.00695 [hep-ph]

C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog et al.,High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC,JHEP05(2016) 058 [1602.00695]

work page arXiv 2016
[2]

Mistlberger, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD, JHEP05, 028, arXiv:1802.00833 [hep-ph]

B. Mistlberger,Higgs boson production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD,JHEP05 (2018) 028 [1802.00833]

work page arXiv 2018
[3]

C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger,Higgs Boson Production in Bottom-Quark Fusion to Third Order in the Strong Coupling,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 051804 [1904.09990]

work page arXiv 2020
[4]

X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss, P.F. Monni, E. Re et al.,Third-Order Fiducial Predictions for Drell-Yan Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 252001 [2203.01565]

work page arXiv 2022
[5]

Baglio, C

J. Baglio, C. Duhr, B. Mistlberger and R. Szafron,Inclusive production cross sections at N3LO,JHEP12(2022) 066 [2209.06138]

work page arXiv 2022
[6]

Campbell and T

J. Campbell and T. Neumann,Third order QCD predictions for fiducial W-boson production,JHEP11(2023) 127 [2308.15382]

work page arXiv 2023
[7]

Neumann and J

T. Neumann and J. Campbell,Fiducial Drell-Yan production at the LHC improved by transverse-momentum resummation at N4LLp+N3LO,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) L011506 [2207.07056]

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, A. Huss, T.-Z. Yang and H.X. Zhu,Transverse mass distribution and charge asymmetry in W boson production to third order in QCD,Phys. Lett. B840(2023) 137876 [2205.11426]

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

Caola, W

F. Caola, W. Chen, C. Duhr, X. Liu, B. Mistlberger, F. Petriello et al.,The Path forward to N3LO, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.06730]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

Catani and M

S. Catani and M. Grazzini,An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 222002 [hep-ph/0703012]

work page arXiv 2007
[11]

Gaunt, M

J. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen, F.J. Tackmann and J.R. Walsh,N-jettiness Subtractions for NNLO QCD Calculations,JHEP09(2015) 058 [1505.04794]

work page arXiv 2015
[12]

Boughezal, C

R. Boughezal, C. Focke, X. Liu and F. Petriello,W-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 062002 [1504.02131]

work page arXiv 2015
[13]

Buonocore, M

L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, J. Haag, L. Rottoli and C. Savoini,Effective transverse momentum in multiple jet production at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014008 [2201.11519]

work page arXiv 2022
[14]

Abreu, J.R

S. Abreu, J.R. Gaunt, P.F. Monni, L. Rottoli and R. Szafron,Quark and gluon two-loop beam functions for leading-jet p T and slicing at NNLO,JHEP04(2023) 127 [2207.07037]

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

Buonocore, M

L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, J. Haag, L. Rottoli and C. Savoini,Exploring slicing variables for jet processes,JHEP12(2023) 193 [2307.11570]

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

R.-J. Fu, R. Rahn, D.Y. Shao, W.J. Waalewijn and B. Wu,qT Slicing with Multiple Jets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 171903 [2412.05358]. – 30 –

work page arXiv 2025
[17]

Buonocore, M

L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, F. Guadagni, J. Haag, S. Kallweit and L. Rottoli,Jet Production at NNLO: Exploring a New Scheme,2512.03954

work page arXiv
[18]

L. Dong, S. Fang, J. Gao, H.T. Li, D.Y. Shao, H.X. Zhu et al.,Two-Dimensional Transverse-Momentum Subtraction and Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at N 3LO in QCD,2603.29673

work page arXiv
[19]

Ebert, B

M.A. Ebert, B. Mistlberger and G. Vita,N-jettiness beam functions at N 3LO,JHEP09 (2020) 143 [2006.03056]

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

Baranowski, A

D. Baranowski, A. Behring, K. Melnikov, L. Tancredi and C. Wever,Beam functions for N-jettiness at N 3LO in perturbative QCD,JHEP02(2023) 073 [2211.05722]

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

Baranowski, M

D. Baranowski, M. Delto, K. Melnikov and C.-Y. Wang,Same-hemisphere three-gluon-emission contribution to the zero-jettiness soft function at N3LO QCD,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014004 [2204.09459]

work page arXiv 2022
[22]

W. Chen, F. Feng, Y. Jia and X. Liu,Double-real-virtual and double-virtual-real corrections to the three-loop thrust soft function,JHEP12(2022) 094 [2206.12323]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Baranowski, M

D. Baranowski, M. Delto, K. Melnikov, A. Pikelner and C.-Y. Wang,One-loop corrections to the double-real emission contribution to the zero-jettiness soft function at N3LO in QCD, JHEP04(2024) 114 [2401.05245]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

Baranowski, M

D. Baranowski, M. Delto, K. Melnikov, A. Pikelner and C.-Y. Wang,Zero-Jettiness Soft Function to Third Order in Perturbative QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 191902 [2409.11042]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Baranowski, M

D. Baranowski, M. Delto, K. Melnikov, A. Pikelner and C.-Y. Wang,Triple real-emission contribution to the zero-jettiness soft function at N3LO in QCD,JHEP04(2025) 084 [2412.14001]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Vita,N 3LO power corrections for 0-jettiness subtractions with fiducial cuts,JHEP07 (2024) 241 [2401.03017]

G. Vita,N 3LO power corrections for 0-jettiness subtractions with fiducial cuts,JHEP07 (2024) 241 [2401.03017]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Boughezal, C

R. Boughezal, C. Focke, W. Giele, X. Liu and F. Petriello,Higgs boson production in association with a jet at NNLO using jettiness subtraction,Phys. Lett. B748(2015) 5 [1505.03893]

work page arXiv 2015
[28]

Alioli, G

S. Alioli, G. Billis, A. Broggio and G. Stagnitto,NNLO predictions with nonlocal subtractions and fiducial power corrections in GENEVA,2504.11357

work page arXiv
[29]

Buonocore, M

L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, F. Guadagni, J. Haag and L. Rottoli,The Quark Jet Function fork T -like Variables in NNLO QCD,2508.19226

work page arXiv
[30]

Baranowski, M

D. Baranowski, M. Delto, K. Melnikov and C.-Y. Wang,On phase-space integrals with Heaviside functions,JHEP02(2022) 081 [2111.13594]

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

Baranowski,NNLO zero-jettiness beam and soft functions to higher orders in the dimensional-regularization parameterϵ,Eur

D. Baranowski,NNLO zero-jettiness beam and soft functions to higher orders in the dimensional-regularization parameterϵ,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 523 [2004.03285]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

G. Bell, B. Dehnadi, T. Mohrmann and R. Rahn,The NNLO soft function for N-jettiness in hadronic collisions,JHEP07(2024) 077 [2312.11626]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Agarwal, K

P. Agarwal, K. Melnikov and I. Pedron,N-jettiness soft function at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD,JHEP05(2024) 005 [2403.03078]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Stewart, F.J

I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and W.J. Waalewijn,N-Jettiness: An Inclusive Event Shape to Veto Jets,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 092002 [1004.2489]. – 31 –

work page arXiv 2010
[35]

Catani and M

S. Catani and M.H. Seymour,A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD,Nucl. Phys. B485(1997) 291 [hep-ph/9605323]

work page arXiv 1997
[36]

Becher, P

T. Becher, P. Hager, M. Neubert and D. Schwienbacher,Factorization Beyond Coherence, 2603.12383

work page arXiv
[37]

Forshaw, A

J.R. Forshaw, A. Kyrieleis and M.H. Seymour,Super-leading logarithms in non-global observables in QCD,JHEP08(2006) 059 [hep-ph/0604094]

work page arXiv 2006
[38]

Forshaw, A

J.R. Forshaw, A. Kyrieleis and M.H. Seymour,Super-leading logarithms in non-global observables in QCD: Colour basis independent calculation,JHEP09(2008) 128 [0808.1269]

work page arXiv 2008
[39]

Forshaw, J

J. Forshaw, J. Keates and S. Marzani,Jet vetoing at the LHC,JHEP07(2009) 023 [0905.1350]

work page arXiv 2009
[40]

Banfi, G.P

A. Banfi, G.P. Salam and G. Zanderighi,Phenomenology of event shapes at hadron colliders,JHEP06(2010) 038 [1001.4082]

work page arXiv 2010
[41]

Duran Delgado, J.R

R.M. Duran Delgado, J.R. Forshaw, S. Marzani and M.H. Seymour,The dijet cross section with a jet veto,JHEP08(2011) 157 [1107.2084]

work page arXiv 2011
[42]

Gaunt,Glauber Gluons and Multiple Parton Interactions,JHEP07(2014) 110 [1405.2080]

J.R. Gaunt,Glauber Gluons and Multiple Parton Interactions,JHEP07(2014) 110 [1405.2080]

work page arXiv 2014
[43]

Zeng,Drell-Yan process with jet vetoes: breaking of generalized factorization,JHEP10 (2015) 189 [1507.01652]

M. Zeng,Drell-Yan process with jet vetoes: breaking of generalized factorization,JHEP10 (2015) 189 [1507.01652]

work page arXiv 2015
[44]

Forshaw and J

J.R. Forshaw and J. Holguin,Coulomb gluons will generally destroy coherence,JHEP12 (2021) 084 [2109.03665]

work page arXiv 2021
[45]

Becher, M

T. Becher, M. Neubert and D.Y. Shao,Resummation of Super-Leading Logarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 212002 [2107.01212]

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

Becher, M

T. Becher, M. Neubert, D.Y. Shao and M. Stillger,Factorization of non-global LHC observables and resummation of super-leading logarithms,JHEP12(2023) 116 [2307.06359]

work page arXiv 2023
[47]

B¨ oer, M

P. B¨ oer, M. Neubert and M. Stillger,Glauber phases in non-global LHC observables: resummation for quark-initiated processes,JHEP10(2023) 075 [2307.11089]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

B¨ oer, P

P. B¨ oer, P. Hager, M. Neubert, M. Stillger and X. Xu,Glauber phases in non-global LHC observables: resummation for gluon-initiated processes,JHEP02(2024) 109 [2311.18811]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

B¨ oer, P

P. B¨ oer, P. Hager, M. Neubert, M. Stillger and X. Xu,Renormalization-group improved resummation of super-leading logarithms,JHEP08(2024) 035 [2405.05305]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Becher, P

T. Becher, P. Hager, G. Martinelli, M. Neubert, D. Schwienbacher and M. Stillger, Super-leading logarithms in pp→2 jets,JHEP01(2025) 171 [2411.12742]

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

Banfi, J.R

A. Banfi, J.R. Forshaw and J. Holguin,The one-jettiness distribution contains super-super-leading logarithms,2511.11799

work page arXiv
[52]

Dasgupta, A

M. Dasgupta, A. Fraley, P.F. Monni and S. Nabeebaccus,Uncharted Logarithmic Structures in QCD Transverse-Energy Flow,2511.14681

work page arXiv
[53]

Bauer, S

C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming and M.E. Luke,Summing Sudakov logarithms in B —¿ X(s gamma) in effective field theory,Phys. Rev.D63(2000) 014006 [hep-ph/0005275]. – 32 –

work page arXiv 2000
[54]

An effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: heavy to light decays

C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart,An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays,Phys. Rev.D63(2001) 114020 [hep-ph/0011336]

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[55]

Bauer and I.W

C.W. Bauer and I.W. Stewart,Invariant operators in collinear effective theory,Phys. Lett. B516(2001) 134 [hep-ph/0107001]

work page arXiv 2001
[56]

Soft-Collinear Factorization in Effective Field Theory

C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart,Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 054022 [hep-ph/0109045]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[57]

Gatheral,Exponentiation of Eikonal Cross-sections in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys

J.G.M. Gatheral,Exponentiation of Eikonal Cross-sections in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B133(1983) 90

1983
[58]

Frenkel and J.C

J. Frenkel and J.C. Taylor,NONABELIAN EIKONAL EXPONENTIATION,Nucl. Phys. B246(1984) 231

1984
[59]

Catani, D

S. Catani, D. Colferai and A. Torrini,Triple (and quadruple) soft-gluon radiation in QCD hard scattering,JHEP01(2020) 118 [1908.01616]

work page arXiv 2020
[60]

Dixon, E

L.J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, K. Yan and H.X. Zhu,Soft gluon emission at two loops in full color,JHEP05(2020) 135 [1912.09370]

work page arXiv 2020
[61]

Catani, L

S. Catani, L. Cieri, D. Colferai and F. Coradeschi,Soft gluon–quark–antiquark emission in QCD hard scattering,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 38 [2210.09397]

work page arXiv 2023
[62]

Del Duca, C

V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, R. Haindl and Z. Liu,Tree-level soft emission of a quark pair in association with a gluon,JHEP01(2023) 040 [2206.01584]

work page arXiv 2023
[63]

Zhu,Double soft current at one-loop in QCD,2009.08919

Y.J. Zhu,Double soft current at one-loop in QCD,2009.08919

work page arXiv 2009
[64]

Czakon, F

M. Czakon, F. Eschment and T. Schellenberger,Revisiting the double-soft asymptotics of one-loop amplitudes in massless QCD,JHEP04(2023) 065 [2211.06465]

work page arXiv 2023
[65]

Y. Li, S. Mantry and F. Petriello,An Exclusive Soft Function for Drell-Yan at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 094014 [1105.5171]

work page arXiv 2011
[66]

Y. Li, D. Neill and H.X. Zhu,An exponential regulator for rapidity divergences,Nucl. Phys. B960(2020) 115193 [1604.00392]

work page arXiv 2020
[67]

Li and H

Y. Li and H.X. Zhu,Bootstrapping Rapidity Anomalous Dimensions for Transverse-Momentum Resummation,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 022004 [1604.01404]

work page arXiv 2017
[68]

Bauer, A.V

C.W. Bauer, A.V. Manohar and P.F. Monni,Disentangling observable dependence in SCETI and SCET II anomalous dimensions: angularities at two loops,JHEP07(2021) 214 [2012.09213]

work page arXiv 2021
[69]

Abreu, J.R

S. Abreu, J.R. Gaunt, P.F. Monni and R. Szafron,The analytic two-loop soft function for leading-jet pT ,JHEP08(2022) 268 [2204.02987]

work page arXiv 2022
[70]

Bennett, E.P

A. Bennett, E.P. Byrne, J.R. Gaunt and E.C. Lang,Analytical results for the C-angularity soft function at NNLO,2512.23398

work page arXiv
[71]

Abreu, J.R

S. Abreu, J.R. Gaunt, P.F. Monni, L. Rottoli and R. Szafron,In preparation, (2026)

2026
[72]

Kelley, M.D

R. Kelley, M.D. Schwartz, R.M. Schabinger and H.X. Zhu,The two-loop hemisphere soft function,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 045022 [1105.3676]

work page arXiv 2011
[73]

Hornig, C

A. Hornig, C. Lee, I.W. Stewart, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi,Non-global Structure of the O(α2 s)Dijet Soft Function,JHEP08(2011) 054 [1105.4628]

work page arXiv 2011
[74]

Monni, T

P.F. Monni, T. Gehrmann and G. Luisoni,Two-Loop Soft Corrections and Resummation of the Thrust Distribution in the Dijet Region,JHEP08(2011) 010 [1105.4560]. – 33 –

work page arXiv 2011
[75]

Kang, O.Z

D. Kang, O.Z. Labun and C. Lee,Equality of hemisphere soft functions fore +e−, DIS and ppcollisions atO(α 2 s),Phys. Lett. B748(2015) 45 [1504.04006]

work page arXiv 2015
[76]

Ravindran, J

V. Ravindran, J. Smith and W.L. van Neerven,QCD threshold corrections to di-lepton and Higgs rapidity distributions beyondN 2 LO,Nucl. Phys. B767(2007) 100 [hep-ph/0608308]

work page arXiv 2007
[77]

Lustermans, J.K.L

G. Lustermans, J.K.L. Michel and F.J. Tackmann,Generalized Threshold Factorization with Full Collinear Dynamics,1908.00985

work page arXiv 1908
[78]

Billis, M.A

G. Billis, M.A. Ebert, J.K.L. Michel and F.J. Tackmann,A toolbox forq T and 0-jettiness subtractions at N 3LO,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 214 [1909.00811]

work page arXiv 2021
[79]

Sterman,Summation of Large Corrections to Short Distance Hadronic Cross-Sections, Nucl

G.F. Sterman,Summation of Large Corrections to Short Distance Hadronic Cross-Sections, Nucl. Phys. B281(1987) 310

1987
[80]

Catani and L

S. Catani and L. Trentadue,Resummation of the QCD Perturbative Series for Hard Processes,Nucl. Phys. B327(1989) 323

1989

Showing first 80 references.