pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13362 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Quasi-Local Celestial Charges and Multipoles

Adam Kmec , Lionel Mason , Romain Ruzziconi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords quasi-local masscelestial symmetrieshigher-spin chargestwistor equationsmultipolesflux-balance lawsself-dual gravityPenrose transform
0
0 comments X

The pith

Penrose's quasi-local mass extends to higher-spin celestial charges and multipoles on finite 2-surfaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper generalizes Penrose's quasi-local mass to higher-spin charges linked to celestial Lw_{1+∞} symmetries. These charges are defined using higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations and expressed as explicit integrals over any finite 2-surface inside a chosen null hypersurface. A reader would care because the approach supplies a geometric definition of these symmetries and multipoles that works in generic spacetimes rather than only at infinity. It also produces natural flux-balance laws along the hypersurface and supplies a phase-space derivation from a twistor action for self-dual gravity.

Core claim

The central claim is that higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations furnish quasi-local expressions for the celestial higher-spin charges, which reduce to conventional multipole definitions, admit explicit evaluation on finite 2-surfaces, and obey flux-balance laws along null hypersurfaces; a first-principles derivation from the twistor-space action for self-dual gravity confirms the same formulae and relates the symmetries to integrability in the self-dual case.

What carries the argument

Higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations, which generate the charges through surface integrals over 2-surfaces and connect the twistor action to asymptotic phase space via the Penrose transform.

If this is right

  • The charges admit explicit computation on any finite 2-surface once a null hypersurface is chosen.
  • The expressions reduce to standard multipole moments in stationary limits.
  • Flux-balance laws hold along the null hypersurface for each charge.
  • In self-dual backgrounds the charges are tied to the integrability of self-dual gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction supplies a practical route to extracting celestial charges from numerical simulations on finite regions rather than asymptotic data.
  • The phase-space derivation suggests these charges participate in the usual celestial symmetry algebra even away from infinity.
  • Similar twistor-based integrals could be explored for other asymptotic symmetry groups or for modified gravity theories.

Load-bearing premise

Higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations exist in generic spacetimes and their integrals reproduce the standard asymptotic phase space at null infinity.

What would settle it

Direct evaluation of the proposed quasi-local higher-spin charges on the Kerr spacetime followed by comparison with its known mass, angular momentum, and multipole moments would confirm or refute the formulae.

read the original abstract

We extend Penrose's quasi-local mass definition to include higher-spin charges associated with the celestial $Lw_{1+\infty}$ symmetries and relate them to traditional definitions of multipoles. The resulting formulae provide explicit expressions that can be computed on finite 2-surfaces, given a choice of null hypersurface. They yield a geometric definition of celestial symmetries and multipoles in generic spacetimes in terms of higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations. This, in turn, gives rise to natural flux-balance laws along the null hypersurface. We also present a first-principles phase-space derivation of these charges, starting from a twistor space action for self-dual gravity that can be identified with the standard gravitational asymptotic phase space at null infinity, performing a large gauge transformation analysis and using the Penrose transform to connect with the corresponding spacetime expressions. Finally, we formulate the spacetime analysis in the Plebanski gauge and relate the celestial symmetries to the integrability of self-dual gravity in the case of a self-dual background.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends Penrose's quasi-local mass definition to higher-spin charges associated with celestial Lw_{1+∞} symmetries and relates them to traditional multipole definitions. It provides explicit formulae for these charges and multipoles that can be computed on finite 2-surfaces given a choice of null hypersurface, using higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations in generic spacetimes. The work includes a first-principles phase-space derivation starting from a twistor-space action for self-dual gravity identified with the standard asymptotic phase space at null infinity, large-gauge analysis, and the Penrose transform; it also formulates the spacetime analysis in the Plebanski gauge and relates the symmetries to integrability of self-dual gravity.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would provide a valuable geometric framework linking quasi-local charges, twistor theory, and celestial symmetries, with explicit computable expressions and flux-balance laws. The first-principles phase-space approach and the attempt to move beyond self-dual backgrounds are notable strengths that could advance understanding of higher-spin multipoles in general relativity.

major comments (2)
  1. [phase-space derivation and identification with asymptotic phase space (as described in the abstract)] The extension to generic (non-self-dual) spacetimes rests on the existence and sufficiency of higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations on finite 2-surfaces. The phase-space derivation begins in the self-dual sector where the twistor equation is integrable, but the manuscript does not establish that the dimension of the solution space for valence-(k,0) or (0,k) twistors matches the 2k+1 or 2k+2 generators of the Lw_{1+∞} algebra in generic metrics, where the equation is overdetermined. This is load-bearing for the claim of a geometric definition in generic spacetimes.
  2. [first-principles phase-space derivation section] The identification of the twistor-space action for self-dual gravity with the standard gravitational asymptotic phase space at null infinity, followed by the transfer to non-self-dual backgrounds via the Penrose transform, requires explicit verification. Without this, the resulting charges may reduce to definitions by construction rather than independent quasi-local quantities.
minor comments (2)
  1. [final spacetime analysis paragraph] The abstract states that the formulae 'yield a geometric definition... in generic spacetimes' but the Plebanski-gauge analysis is restricted to self-dual backgrounds; a clearer separation between the self-dual derivation and the generic claim would improve readability.
  2. Notation for the higher-valence twistor solutions and their relation to the Lw_{1+∞} generators could be introduced with a brief table or explicit count of independent solutions to aid readers unfamiliar with twistor methods.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [phase-space derivation and identification with asymptotic phase space (as described in the abstract)] The extension to generic (non-self-dual) spacetimes rests on the existence and sufficiency of higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations on finite 2-surfaces. The phase-space derivation begins in the self-dual sector where the twistor equation is integrable, but the manuscript does not establish that the dimension of the solution space for valence-(k,0) or (0,k) twistors matches the 2k+1 or 2k+2 generators of the Lw_{1+∞} algebra in generic metrics, where the equation is overdetermined. This is load-bearing for the claim of a geometric definition in generic spacetimes.

    Authors: We agree that the dimension of the solution space for the twistor equations in generic spacetimes requires careful consideration, as the equations are overdetermined. In the manuscript, the quasi-local charges are defined using specific higher-valence twistor solutions that are constructed to correspond to the celestial symmetries, and we provide explicit formulae that can be evaluated on finite 2-surfaces whenever such solutions exist. The phase-space derivation is performed in the self-dual sector where integrability holds, and the extension to generic cases is via the Penrose transform, which maps the structures appropriately. However, we acknowledge that a general proof of the exact dimension matching (2k+1 or 2k+2) for arbitrary metrics is not fully detailed. We will revise the manuscript to include a discussion on the existence and dimension of these solution spaces in generic spacetimes, perhaps with examples or references to known results on twistor equations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [first-principles phase-space derivation section] The identification of the twistor-space action for self-dual gravity with the standard gravitational asymptotic phase space at null infinity, followed by the transfer to non-self-dual backgrounds via the Penrose transform, requires explicit verification. Without this, the resulting charges may reduce to definitions by construction rather than independent quasi-local quantities.

    Authors: The identification of the twistor-space action with the asymptotic phase space at null infinity is based on the standard correspondence in twistor theory for self-dual gravity, as established in the literature on asymptotic symmetries and twistor methods. We perform the large gauge transformation analysis in this setting and then apply the Penrose transform to obtain the spacetime expressions. To address the concern, we will expand the relevant section to provide more explicit steps verifying this identification, including how the symplectic structure matches and how the charges are independent. This will clarify that the definitions are not merely by construction but derived from first principles. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained from action principle

full rationale

The paper derives the quasi-local charges from a twistor-space action for self-dual gravity, performs large-gauge analysis, applies the Penrose transform to obtain spacetime expressions, and relates them to Penrose's quasi-local mass and multipoles. This constitutes an independent derivation starting from an action rather than a redefinition or fit of the target quantities. No equations in the provided text reduce the final charge formulae to the inputs by construction, and the extension to generic spacetimes is asserted without evidence of tautological equivalence. The central claims retain independent content beyond the starting assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence of higher-valence twistor solutions in generic spacetimes and on the equivalence between a twistor-space action and the standard null-infinity phase space; no free parameters or new invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Higher-valence solutions to the twistor equations exist and define the charges in generic spacetimes
    Required for the geometric definition on finite surfaces.
  • domain assumption Twistor space action for self-dual gravity is identified with the standard gravitational asymptotic phase space at null infinity
    Used to perform the large-gauge-transformation analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 1354 out tokens · 56049 ms · 2026-05-10T14:05:30.656007+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Einstein,Hamilton’s Principle and the General Theory of Relativity, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein,Hamilton’s Principle and the General Theory of Relativity, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1916(1916) 1111–1116

    1916

  2. [2]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschits,The Classical Theory of Fields, vol. Volume 2 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975

    1975

  3. [3]

    P. A. M. Dirac,Fixation of coordinates in the Hamiltonian theory of gravitation, Phys. Rev. 114(1959) 924–930

    1959

  4. [4]

    P. A. M. Dirac,Energy of the Gravitational Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.2(1959), no. 8, 368

    1959

  5. [5]

    R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C. W. Misner,Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity, Phys. Rev.116(1959) 1322–1330

    1959

  6. [6]

    Regge and C

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim,Role of Surface Integrals in the Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity, Annals Phys.88(1974) 286

    1974

  7. [7]

    Penrose,Quasilocal mass and angular momentum in general relativity, Proc

    R. Penrose,Quasilocal mass and angular momentum in general relativity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A381(1982) 53–63

    1982

  8. [8]

    Penrose,New improved quasi-local mass and the Schwarzschild solutions, Twistor Newsletter 18(1984) 7–11

    R. Penrose,New improved quasi-local mass and the Schwarzschild solutions, Twistor Newsletter 18(1984) 7–11

    1984

  9. [9]

    Penrose,A suggested further modification to the quasi-local formula, Twistor Newsletter 1985(1985), no

    R. Penrose,A suggested further modification to the quasi-local formula, Twistor Newsletter 1985(1985), no. 20, 7

    1985

  10. [10]

    Penrose and W

    R. Penrose and W. Rindler,Spinors and space-time: Volume 2, Spinor and twistor methods in space-time geometry, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 1984

    1984

  11. [11]

    L. J. Mason,A Hamiltonian interpretation of Penrose’s quasi-local mass, Classical and Quantum Gravity6(feb, 1989) L7

    1989

  12. [12]

    Mason and J

    L. Mason and J. Frauendiener,The Sparling 3-form, Ashtekar Variables and Quasi-local Mass, p. 189–217. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 1990

    1990

  13. [13]

    Witten,A Simple Proof of the Positive Energy Theorem, Commun

    E. Witten,A Simple Proof of the Positive Energy Theorem, Commun. Math. Phys.80(1981) 381

    1981

  14. [14]

    Bartnik,New definition of quasilocal mass, Phys

    R. Bartnik,New definition of quasilocal mass, Phys. Rev. Lett.62(1989) 2346–2348

    1989

  15. [15]

    A. J. Dougan and L. J. Mason,Quasilocal mass constructions with positive energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 2119–2122 53

    1991

  16. [16]

    J. D. Brown and J. W. York, Jr.,Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action, Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1407–1419,gr-qc/9209012

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

  17. [17]

    Kijowski,A Simple Derivation of Canonical Structure and Quasi-local Hamiltonians in General Relativity, General Relativity and Gravitation29(1997), no

    J. Kijowski,A Simple Derivation of Canonical Structure and Quasi-local Hamiltonians in General Relativity, General Relativity and Gravitation29(1997), no. 3, 307–343

    1997

  18. [18]

    C.-C. M. Liu and S.-T. Yau,Positivity of Quasilocal Mass, Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 231102, gr-qc/0303019

    work page arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    Wang and S.-T

    M.-T. Wang and S.-T. Yau,Quasilocal mass in general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 021101,0804.1174

    work page arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    L. B. Szabados,Quasi-Local Energy-Momentum and Angular Momentum in General Relativity, Living Rev. Rel.12(2009) 4

    2009

  21. [21]

    Some Properties of Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald,Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 846–864,gr-qc/9403028

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  22. [22]

    R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas,A General definition of ‘conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity, Phys. Rev.D61(2000) 084027,gr-qc/9911095

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  23. [23]

    Barnich and F

    G. Barnich and F. Brandt,Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges, Nucl. Phys.B633(2002) 3–82,hep-th/0111246

    work page arXiv 2002

  24. [24]

    Barnich,Boundary charges in gauge theories: Using Stokes theorem in the bulk, Class

    G. Barnich,Boundary charges in gauge theories: Using Stokes theorem in the bulk, Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 3685–3698,hep-th/0301039

    work page arXiv 2003

  25. [25]

    Guevara, E

    A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate and A. Strominger,Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity, JHEP11(2021) 152,2103.03961

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Strominger,w 1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries, Phys

    A. Strominger,w 1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 22, 221601

    2021

  27. [27]

    Adamo, L

    T. Adamo, L. Mason and A. Sharma,Celestialw1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space, SIGMA 18(2022) 016,2110.06066

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Penrose,The Nonlinear Graviton, Gen

    R. Penrose,The Nonlinear Graviton, Gen. Rel. Grav.7(1976) 171–176

    1976

  29. [29]

    Penrose,Nonlinear gravitons and curved twistor theory, Gen

    R. Penrose,Nonlinear gravitons and curved twistor theory, Gen. Rel. Grav.7(1976) 31–52

    1976

  30. [30]

    Freidel, D

    L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti and A.-M. Raclariu,Higher spin dynamics in gravity andw1+∞ celestial symmetries,2112.15573

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Geiller,Celestialw 1+∞ charges and the subleading structure of asymptotically-flat spacetimes, [2403.05195]

    M. Geiller,Celestialw 1+∞ charges and the subleading structure of asymptotically-flat spacetimes,2403.05195

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Cresto and L

    N. Cresto and L. Freidel,Asymptotic Higher Spin Symmetries I: Covariant Wedge Algebra in Gravity,2409.12178

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Cresto and L

    N. Cresto and L. Freidel,Asymptotic Higher Spin Symmetries II: Noether Realization in Gravity,2410.15219

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Cresto,Asymptotic Higher Spin Symmetries: Noether Realization & Algebraic Structure in Einstein-Yang-Mills Theory

    N. Cresto,Asymptotic Higher Spin Symmetries: Noether Realization & Algebraic Structure in Einstein-Yang-Mills Theory. PhD thesis, U. Waterloo (main), 2025.2509.17137

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Ashtekar and M

    A. Ashtekar and M. Streubel,Symplectic Geometry of Radiative Modes and Conserved Quantities at Null Infinity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.A376(1981) 585–607 54

    1981

  36. [36]

    A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Celestial Lw1+∞ charges from a twistor action, JHEP10(2024) 250,2407.04028

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    L. J. Mason and M. Wolf,Twistor Actions for Self-Dual Supergravities, Commun. Math. Phys. 288(2009) 97–123,0706.1941

    work page arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    Ruzziconi and C

    R. Ruzziconi and C. Zwikel,Celestial symmetries of black hole horizons, Phys. Rev. D113 (2026), no. 4, L041504,2504.08027

    work page arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Ruzziconi and C

    R. Ruzziconi and C. Zwikel,Celestial Lw1+∞symmetries and subleading phase space of null hypersurfaces, Phys. Rev. D113(2026), no. 4, 044067,2511.07525

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Comp` ere, R

    G. Compère, R. Oliveri and A. Seraj,Metric reconstruction from celestial multipoles, JHEP11 (2022) 001,2206.12597

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    R. P. Geroch,Multipole moments. I. Flat space, J. Math. Phys.11(1970) 1955–1961

    1970

  42. [42]

    R. P. Geroch,Multipole moments. II. Curved space, J. Math. Phys.11(1970) 2580–2588

    1970

  43. [43]

    R. O. Hansen,Multipole moments of stationary space-times, J. Math. Phys.15(1974) 46–52

    1974

  44. [44]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour,Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity I. general structure of the field outside the source, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A320(1986) 379–430

    1986

  45. [45]

    Blanchet,Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity

    L. Blanchet,Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity. 2. Asymptotic behaviour at future null infinity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A409(1987) 383–399

    1987

  46. [46]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour,Tail Transported Temporal Correlations in the Dynamics of a Gravitating System, Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 1410

    1988

  47. [47]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour,Hereditary effects in gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 4304–4319

    1992

  48. [48]

    and Damour, T

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour and B. R. Iyer,Surface-integral expressions for the multipole moments of post-Newtonian sources and the boosted Schwarzschild solution, Class. Quant. Grav.22 (2005) 155–182,gr-qc/0410021

    work page arXiv 2005

  49. [49]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Compère, G. Faye, R. Oliveri and A. Seraj,Multipole expansion of gravitational waves: from harmonic to Bondi coordinates, JHEP02(2021) 029,2011.10000

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Compère, R

    G. Compère, R. Oliveri and A. Seraj,Gravitational multipole moments from Noether charges, JHEP05(2018) 054,1711.08806

    work page arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    K. S. Thorne,Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys.52(1980) 299–339

    1980

  52. [52]

    Gürsel,Multipole moments for stationary systems: The equivalence of the Geroch-Hansen formulation and the Thorne formulation, Gen

    Y. Gürsel,Multipole moments for stationary systems: The equivalence of the Geroch-Hansen formulation and the Thorne formulation, Gen. Rel. Grav.15(1983), no. 8, 737–754

    1983

  53. [53]

    C. G. E.,Twistors and multipole moments, Proc. R. Soc. Lond.A359(1978) 133–149

    1978

  54. [54]

    Penrose and W

    R. Penrose and W. Rindler,Spinors and Space-Time, vol. 2 ofCambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986

    1986

  55. [55]

    A. J. Dougan,Quasi-local mass for spheres, Classical and Quantum Gravity9(nov, 1992) 2461

    1992

  56. [56]

    K. P. Tod,Some Examples of Penrose’s Quasi-Local Mass Construction, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A388(1983), no. 1795, 457–477 55

    1983

  57. [57]

    T. N. Bailey and R. J. Baston, eds.,Twistors in mathematics and physics, vol. 156. 1990

    1990

  58. [58]

    S. A. Huggett and K. P. Tod,An Introduction to Twistor Theory. London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 1994

    1994

  59. [59]

    Penrose,Null Hypersurface Initial Data for Classical Fields of Arbitrary Spin and for General Relativity, General Relativity and Gravitation12(1980) 225–264

    R. Penrose,Null Hypersurface Initial Data for Classical Fields of Arbitrary Spin and for General Relativity, General Relativity and Gravitation12(1980) 225–264

    1980

  60. [60]

    E. T. Newman and T. W. J. Unti,Behavior of Asymptotically Flat Empty Spaces, J. Math. Phys.3(1962), no. 5, 891

    1962

  61. [61]

    A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi and A. Sharma,S-algebra in Gauge Theory: Twistor, Spacetime and Holographic Perspectives,2506.01888

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    L. J. Mason and D. Skinner,Gravity, Twistors and the MHV Formalism, Commun. Math. Phys.294(2010) 827–862,0808.3907

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    R. S. Ward,A class of self-dual solutions of Einstein’s equations, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences363(1978), no. 1713, 289–295, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspa.1978.0170

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0170 1978

  64. [64]

    Dunajski and L.J

    M. Dunajski and L. Mason,HyperKahler hierarchies and their twistor theory, Commun. Math. Phys.213(2000) 641–672,math/0001008

    work page arXiv 2000

  65. [65]

    Dunajski and L

    M. Dunajski and L. J. Mason,Twistor theory of hyperKahler metrics with hidden symmetries, J. Math. Phys.44(2003) 3430–3454,math/0301171

    work page arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    BMS charge algebra

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,BMS charge algebra, JHEP12(2011) 105,1106.0213

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    Barnich,A Note on gauge systems from the point of view of Lie algebroids, AIP Conf

    G. Barnich,A Note on gauge systems from the point of view of Lie algebroids, AIP Conf. Proc. 1307(2010), no. 1, 7–18,1010.0899

    work page arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP05(2010) 062, 1001.1541

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  69. [69]

    J. F. Plebanski,Some solutions of complex Einstein equations, J. Math. Phys.16(1975) 2395–2402

    1975

  70. [70]

    Takasaki,An Infinite Number of Hidden Variables in Hyperkahler Metrics, J

    K. Takasaki,An Infinite Number of Hidden Variables in Hyperkahler Metrics, J. Math. Phys. 30(1989) 1515

    1989

  71. [71]

    C. P. Boyer and J. F. Plebanski,An Infinite Hierarchy of Conservation Laws and Nonlinear Superposition Principles for Self-dual Einstein Spaces, J. Math. Phys.26(1985) 229–234

    1985

  72. [72]

    Campiglia and S

    M. Campiglia and S. Nagy,A double copy for asymptotic symmetries in the self-dual sector, JHEP03(2021) 262,2102.01680

    work page arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Miller,SpacetimeLw 1+∞ Symmetry and Self-Dual Gravity in Plebanski Gauge, [2504.07176]

    N. Miller,SpacetimeLw 1+∞ Symmetry and Self-Dual Gravity in Plebanski Gauge,2504.07176

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    Anninos, D.A

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante and C. Maneerat,Gravitational observatories, JHEP12(2023) 024, 2310.08648

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Anninos, D

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante and C. Maneerat,Cosmological observatories, Class. Quant. Grav. 41(2024), no. 16, 165009,2402.04305

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Anninos, R

    D. Anninos, R. Arias, D. A. Galante and C. Maneerat,Gravitational observatories in AdS4, JHEP07(2025) 234,2412.16305 56

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Adami, M

    H. Adami, M. Golshani, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo and M. H. Vahidinia,Covariant phase space formalism for fluctuating boundaries, JHEP09(2024) 157,2407.03259

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and V. Taghiloo,AdS3 Freelance Holography, A Detailed Analysis, 2510.10692

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Ruzziconi,Carrollian Physics and Holography,arXiv:2602.02644 [hep-th]

    R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian Physics and Holography,2602.02644

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Córdova and S.-H

    C. Córdova and S.-H. Shao,Light-ray Operators and the BMS Algebra, Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 12, 125015,1810.05706

    work page arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.