pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13486 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Taming Trotter Errors with Quantum Resources

Xiangran Zhang , Jue Xu , Qi Zhao , You Zhou
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Trotter errorquantum simulationentanglement entropymagicnon-stabilizernesserror statisticsHamiltonian simulationSuzuki-Trotter decomposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

States with more entanglement show lower variance in Trotter errors while higher magic reduces the chance of large error outliers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes collections of quantum states that all share the same entanglement entropy or the same amount of magic, then tracks how the errors from the Trotter-Suzuki approximation behave across each collection. It finds that the variance of these errors falls as entanglement rises, so the errors cluster more tightly around their average value. It also finds that the kurtosis of the error distribution falls linearly with magic, which means the tails become lighter and extreme deviations become less probable. A reader would care because these resources are exactly what make states hard to simulate on classical computers, yet here they appear to make the quantum simulation itself more stable against its own approximation errors.

Core claim

By studying ensembles of states with fixed entanglement entropy or fixed magic, the authors show that the variance of the Trotter error decreases with increasing entanglement entropy while the kurtosis exhibits a negative linear dependence on magic. The first effect produces stronger concentration of the error around its mean for entangled states; the second produces lighter-tailed distributions and therefore lower probability of large deviations for high-magic states.

What carries the argument

Statistical moments (variance and kurtosis) of the Trotter error distribution evaluated over ensembles of states constrained to fixed entanglement entropy or fixed magic.

If this is right

  • Trotter-based simulations of highly entangled states require smaller time steps or fewer repetitions to reach a target accuracy because the error is more concentrated.
  • High-magic initial states lower the risk of rare but catastrophic simulation failures in Trotterized evolution.
  • The same resources that obstruct classical emulation also supply an intrinsic error-suppression mechanism for the quantum algorithm.
  • Error statistics can be tuned by preparing states with chosen levels of entanglement or magic rather than by changing the Hamiltonian or the Trotter order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Circuit designers could deliberately inject controlled entanglement early in an algorithm to exploit the variance reduction for later Trotter steps.
  • The same moment-analysis technique might be applied to other product formulas or to qubitization to test whether the resource-robustness link is method-specific.
  • In the presence of hardware noise the error-taming effect could partially offset decoherence if the algorithmic errors and noise errors have different tail behaviors.
  • Numerical checks on small systems with tunable magic (such as Clifford+T circuits) would give a direct test of the kurtosis-magic relation before scaling to larger simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The observed statistical trends in fixed-entanglement and fixed-magic ensembles are representative of the states that appear in actual quantum simulation tasks.

What would settle it

Compute the Trotter error variance for a sequence of random states whose entanglement entropy is increased in controlled steps while all other simulation parameters are held fixed, and check whether the variance decreases monotonically.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13486 by Jue Xu, Qi Zhao, Xiangran Zhang, You Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Entanglement reduces error size, while magic sup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Entanglement reduces the variance of simula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magic reduces the kurtosis of simulation errors of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Error distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Both entanglement and magic exhibit growth during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Entanglement reduces the variance of long-time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum simulation is a cornerstone application of quantum computing, yet how fundamental quantum resources--entanglement and non-stabilizerness (``magic")--shape simulation fidelity remains an open question. In this work, we establish a rigorous connection between these resources and the statistical behavior of algorithmic errors arising in Hamiltonian simulation based on the Trotter-Suzuki formula. By analyzing ensembles of states with fixed entanglement entropy or magic, we make two key discoveries: First, the variance of the Trotter error decreases with increasing entanglement entropy, indicating a stronger concentration of error for entangled states. Moreover, we find that the kurtosis of the error exhibits a negative linear dependence on magic, implying that states with high magic possess lighter-tailed error distributions and thus a reduced probability of large deviations. These findings reveal a subtle phenomenon: quantum resources that obstruct classical emulation may, paradoxically, enhance the intrinsic robustness of quantum simulation, highlighting a constructive interplay between complexity and stability in quantum computation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to establish a rigorous connection between quantum resources (entanglement entropy and non-stabilizerness/magic) and the statistical properties of Trotter-Suzuki errors in Hamiltonian simulation. By sampling ensembles of states with these resources held fixed, the authors report two main findings: the variance of the Trotter error decreases with increasing entanglement entropy (indicating stronger error concentration), and the kurtosis of the error distribution exhibits a negative linear dependence on magic (implying lighter tails and lower probability of large deviations for high-magic states). These are interpreted as evidence that quantum resources can paradoxically enhance simulation robustness.

Significance. If the central statistical relations hold and generalize, the work would provide a novel perspective on how entanglement and magic affect algorithmic error distributions, potentially informing error analysis and mitigation in quantum simulation. The ensemble approach yields quantitative, falsifiable relations between resources and error moments (variance and kurtosis), which is a methodological strength. However, the practical relevance depends on whether the fixed-resource ensembles accurately reflect error statistics for states arising in actual simulations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Ensemble construction and statistical analysis sections] The central claim that the observed variance reduction and kurtosis-magic relation imply enhanced robustness for quantum simulations rests on the assumption that fixed-EE/magic ensembles are representative of states encountered in Trotter evolution. No comparison is provided between error distributions over these ensembles and those over dynamically generated states (e.g., time-evolved product states under the same Hamiltonian), leaving open whether the reported concentration and tail-lightening are general properties or artifacts of the ensemble construction. This is load-bearing for the interpretation in the abstract and conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts a 'rigorous connection' and specific discoveries but contains no equations, definitions of the ensembles, or details on the Trotter formula implementation, making initial assessment of the claims difficult.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address the major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to clarify the scope of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Ensemble construction and statistical analysis sections] The central claim that the observed variance reduction and kurtosis-magic relation imply enhanced robustness for quantum simulations rests on the assumption that fixed-EE/magic ensembles are representative of states encountered in Trotter evolution. No comparison is provided between error distributions over these ensembles and those over dynamically generated states (e.g., time-evolved product states under the same Hamiltonian), leaving open whether the reported concentration and tail-lightening are general properties or artifacts of the ensemble construction. This is load-bearing for the interpretation in the abstract and conclusion.

    Authors: The fixed-resource ensembles were constructed precisely to isolate the dependence of Trotter-error moments on entanglement entropy and magic, independent of any particular dynamical trajectory. This controlled sampling yields quantitative, falsifiable relations that are difficult to extract from single time-evolved states, where resource values and error statistics are correlated through the evolution itself. We agree that the manuscript does not contain an explicit comparison to dynamically generated states, and that such a comparison would strengthen the claim of practical relevance. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that (i) states the assumption underlying the ensemble approach, (ii) notes that the reported trends are properties of states with given resource content rather than of the full time-evolution operator, and (iii) identifies comparison with dynamically evolved ensembles as an important direction for future work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: statistical findings derived from independent ensemble sampling

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct analysis of ensembles constructed with fixed entanglement entropy or magic, from which variance and kurtosis of Trotter errors are computed as observable quantities. No step equates a derived prediction to its own input by construction, renames a fitted parameter as a forecast, or relies on a self-citation chain for a uniqueness theorem. The reported negative linear dependence and variance reduction are presented as empirical outcomes of the sampling procedure rather than tautological re-expressions of the ensemble definitions. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not trigger any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the ability to construct and analyze ensembles of states with fixed entanglement entropy or magic, plus the applicability of variance and kurtosis as meaningful descriptors of Trotter error distributions. No free parameters are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Variance and kurtosis are well-defined statistical measures that can be computed over ensembles of quantum states and their associated Trotter errors.
    Basic probability and statistics invoked to describe error behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1402 out tokens · 69072 ms · 2026-05-10T13:18:02.792053+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, International Journal of Theoretical Physics21, 467 (1982)

    1982

  2. [2]

    R. P. Feynman, Quantum Mechanical Computers, Optics News11, 11 (1985)

    1985

  3. [3]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 153 (2014), arXiv:1308.6253

    work page arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Quantum Simulators: Architectures and Opportunities,

    E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Dem- ler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriks- son, K.-M. C. Fu, M. Greiner, K. R. Hazzard, R. G. Hulet, A. J. Koll´ ar, B. L. Lev, M. D. Lukin, R. Ma, X. Mi, S. Misra, C. Monroe, K. Murch, Z. Nazario, K.-K. Ni, A. C. Potter, P. Roushan, M. Saffman, M. Schleier- Smith, I. Siddiqi, R. Simmonds,...

    work page arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    2011

  6. [6]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 045003 (2021), arXiv:2011.12127. 6

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entan- gled quantum computations, Phys

    G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entan- gled quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 147902 (2003)

    2003

  8. [8]

    F. A. Y. N. Schr¨ oder, D. H. P. Turban, A. J. Musser, N. D. M. Hine, and A. W. Chin, Tensor network sim- ulation of multi-environmental open quantum dynamics via machine learning and entanglement renormalisation, Nature Communications10, 1062 (2019)

    2019

  9. [10]

    Veitch, S

    V. Veitch, S. A. Hamed Mousavian, D. Gottesman, and J. Emerson, The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation, New Journal of Physics16, 013009 (2014)

    2014

  10. [11]

    A. Gu, L. Leone, S. Ghosh, J. Eisert, S. F. Yelin, and Y. Quek, Pseudomagic Quantum States, Physical Review Letters132, 210602 (2024), arXiv:2308.16228

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [12]

    A. Gu, S. F. Oliviero, and L. Leone, Magic-Induced Com- putational Separation in Entanglement Theory, PRX Quantum6, 020324 (2025), arXiv:2403.19610

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [13]

    The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum Computers

    D. Gottesman, The heisenberg representation of quan- tum computers (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9807006 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  13. [14]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A70, 052328 (2004)

    2004

  14. [15]

    Bravyi, D

    S. Bravyi, D. Browne, P. Calpin, E. Campbell, D. Gosset, and M. Howard, Simulation of quantum circuits by low- rank stabilizer decompositions, Quantum3, 181 (2019), arXiv:1808.00128

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [16]

    Howard and E

    M. Howard and E. Campbell, Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum com- puting, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 090501 (2017)

    2017

  16. [17]

    S ¸ahino˘ glu and R

    B. S ¸ahino˘ glu and R. D. Somma, Hamiltonian simulation in the low-energy subspace, npj Quantum Information7, 119 (2021)

    2021

  17. [19]

    S ¸ahino˘ glu and R

    B. S ¸ahino˘ glu and R. D. Somma, Hamiltonian simulation in the low-energy subspace, npj Quantum Information7, 10.1038/s41534-021-00451-w (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00451-w 2021

  18. [20]

    W. Gong, S. Zhou, and T. Li, Complexity of Digital Quantum Simulation in the Low-Energy Subspace: Ap- plications and a Lower Bound, Quantum8, 1409 (2024)

    2024

  19. [21]

    Hejazi, M

    K. Hejazi, M. S. Zini, and J. M. Arrazola, Bet- ter bounds for low-energy product formulas (2024), arXiv:2402.10362 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [22]

    Yi and E

    C. Yi and E. Crosson, Spectral analysis of product formu- las for quantum simulation, npj Quantum Information8, 37

  21. [23]

    Q. Zhao, Y. Zhou, A. F. Shaw, T. Li, and A. M. Childs, Hamiltonian simulation with random inputs, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 270502 (2022)

    2022

  22. [24]

    Chen and F

    C.-F. Chen and F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, Average-case speedup for product formulas, Communications in Math- ematical Physics405, 32 (2024)

    2024

  23. [25]

    Burgarth, N

    D. Burgarth, N. Galke, A. Hahn, and L. van Luijk, State- dependent trotter limits and their approximations, Phys. Rev. A107, L040201 (2023)

    2023

  24. [26]

    Burgarth, P

    D. Burgarth, P. Facchi, A. Hahn, M. Johnsson, and K. Yuasa, Strong error bounds for trotter and strang- splittings and their implications for quantum chemistry, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043155 (2024)

    2024

  25. [27]

    Becker, N

    S. Becker, N. Galke, L. van Luijk, and R. Salzmann, Con- vergence rates for the trotter splitting for unbounded op- erators, Foundations of Computational Mathematics , 1 (2025)

    2025

  26. [28]

    M¨ obus, On Strong Bounds for Trotter and Zeno Prod- uct Formulas with Bosonic Applications, Quantum8, 1424 (2024)

    T. M¨ obus, On Strong Bounds for Trotter and Zeno Prod- uct Formulas with Bosonic Applications, Quantum8, 1424 (2024)

    2024

  27. [29]

    D. Fang, X. Wu, and A. Soffer, On the trotter error in many-body quantum dynamics with coulomb potentials (2025), arXiv:2507.22707 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [30]

    Hatomura, The first-order trotter decomposition in the dynamical-invariant basis (2023), arXiv:2308.15100 [quant-ph]

    T. Hatomura, The first-order trotter decomposition in the dynamical-invariant basis (2023), arXiv:2308.15100 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [31]

    Hatomura, State-dependent error bound for digital quantum simulation of driven systems, Phys

    T. Hatomura, State-dependent error bound for digital quantum simulation of driven systems, Phys. Rev. A105, L050601 (2022)

    2022

  30. [32]

    D. An, D. Fang, and L. Lin, Time-dependent unbounded hamiltonian simulation with vector norm scaling, Quan- tum5, 459 (2021)

    2021

  31. [33]

    Su, H.-Y

    Y. Su, H.-Y. Huang, and E. T. Campbell, Nearly tight trotterization of interacting electrons, Quantum5, 495 (2021)

    2021

  32. [34]

    J. Xu, C. Zhao, J. Fan, and Q. Zhao, Exponentially De- caying Quantum Simulation Error with Noisy Devices (2025), arXiv:2504.10247

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [35]

    Q. Zhao, Y. Zhou, and A. M. Childs, Entanglement ac- celerates quantum simulation, Nature Physics21, 1338 (2025)

    2025

  34. [36]

    H. Kim, T. N. Ikeda, and D. A. Huse, Testing whether all eigenstates obey the eigenstate thermalization hypothe- sis, Phys. Rev. E90, 052105 (2014)

    2014

  35. [37]

    H. F. Trotter, On the product of semi-groups of opera- tors, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 10, 545 (1959)

    1959

  36. [38]

    Suzuki, General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics, Journal of mathematical physics32, 400 (1991)

    M. Suzuki, General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics, Journal of mathematical physics32, 400 (1991)

    1991

  37. [39]

    Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    1996

  38. [40]

    A. M. Childs, D. Maslov, Y. Nam, N. J. Ross, and Y. Su, Toward the first quantum simulation with quan- tum speedup, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 9456 (2018)

    2018

  39. [41]

    Yoshida, Construction of higher order symplectic in- tegrators, Physics Letters A150, 262

    H. Yoshida, Construction of higher order symplectic in- tegrators, Physics Letters A150, 262

  40. [42]

    M. E. S. Morales, P. C. S. Costa, G. Pantaleoni, D. K. Burgarth, Y. R. Sanders, and D. W. Berry, Selection and improvement of product formulae for best performance of quantum simulation, Quantum Information & Computa- tion25, 1–35 (2025)

    2025

  41. [43]

    W. Gong, S. Zhou, and T. Li, Complexity of digital quan- tum simulation in the low-energy subspace: Applications and a lower bound, Quantum8, 1409 (2024)

    2024

  42. [44]

    Mizuta and T

    K. Mizuta and T. Kuwahara, Trotterization is substan- tially efficient for low-energy states, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 130602 (2025)

    2025

  43. [45]

    A. M. Childs, Y. Su, M. C. Tran, N. Wiebe, and S. Zhu, Theory of trotter error with commutator scaling, Phys. Rev. X11, 011020 (2021)

    2021

  44. [46]

    Collins and P

    B. Collins and P. ´Sniady, Integration with respect to the haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group, Communications in Mathematical Physics264, 773 (2006)

    2006

  45. [47]

    A. A. Mele, Introduction to haar measure tools in quan- 7 tum information: A beginner’s tutorial, Quantum8, 1340 (2024)

    2024

  46. [48]

    E. T. Campbell and D. E. Browne, Bound states for magic state distillation in fault-tolerant quantum com- putation, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 030503 (2010)

    2010

  47. [49]

    Bravyi and A

    S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computa- tion with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A71, 022316 (2005)

    2005

  48. [50]

    E. T. Campbell, B. M. Terhal, and C. Vuillot, Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation, Nature549, 172 (2017)

    2017

  49. [51]

    Eastin and E

    B. Eastin and E. Knill, Restrictions on transversal en- coded quantum gate sets, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 110502 (2009)

    2009

  50. [52]

    Bravyi and J

    S. Bravyi and J. Haah, Magic-state distillation with low overhead, Physical Review A86, 052329 (2012)

    2012

  51. [53]

    Howard and E

    M. Howard and E. Campbell, Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum com- puting, Physical review letters118, 090501 (2017)

    2017

  52. [54]

    Niroula, C

    P. Niroula, C. D. White, Q. Wang, S. Johri, D. Zhu, C. Monroe, C. Noel, and M. J. Gullans, Phase transition in magic with random quantum circuits, Nature Physics 20, 1786 (2024), arXiv:2304.10481

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [55]

    Wills, M.-H

    A. Wills, M.-H. Hsieh, and H. Yamasaki, Constant- overhead magic state distillation, Nature Physics , 1 (2025), arXiv:2408.07764

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [56]

    Carrasco, M

    J. Carrasco, M. Langer, A. Neven, and B. Kraus, Gaining confidence on the correct realization of arbitrary quan- tum computations, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L032074 (2024)

    2024

  55. [57]

    Liu and A

    Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, Many-Body Quantum Magic, PRX Quantum3, 020333 (2022), arXiv:2010.13817

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [58]

    J. Chen, Y. Yan, and Y. Zhou, Magic of quantum hyper- graph states, Quantum8, 1351 (2024)

    2024

  57. [59]

    P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, T. Chanda, and M. Dal- monte, Many-body magic via pauli-markov chains—from criticality to gauge theories, PRX Quantum4, 040317 (2023)

    2023

  58. [60]

    Turkeshi, A

    X. Turkeshi, A. Dymarsky, and P. Sierant, Pauli spec- trum and nonstabilizerness of typical quantum many- body states, Physical Review B111, 054301 (2025)

    2025

  59. [61]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, Y. Zhou, and A. Hamma, Quantum Chaos is Quantum, Quantum5, 453 (2021), arXiv:2102.08406

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [62]

    Passarelli, P

    G. Passarelli, P. Lucignano, D. Rossini, and A. Rus- somanno, Chaos and magic in the dissipative quantum kicked top, Quantum9, 1653 (2025)

    2025

  61. [63]

    K. Goto, T. Nosaka, and M. Nozaki, Probing chaos by magic monotones, Phys. Rev. D106, 126009 (2022)

    2022

  62. [64]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Stabi- lizer R´ enyi entropy, Physical Review Letters128, 050402 (2022), arXiv:2106.12587

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [65]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli, Stabilizer entropies and nonstabi- lizerness monotones, Quantum7, 1092 (2023)

    2023

  64. [66]

    Leone and L

    L. Leone and L. Bittel, Stabilizer entropies are mono- tones for magic-state resource theory, Phys. Rev. A110, L040403 (2024)

    2024

  65. [67]

    Dowling, P

    N. Dowling, P. Kos, and X. Turkeshi, Magic Resources of the Heisenberg Picture, Physical Review Letters135, 050401 (2025), arXiv:2408.16047

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [68]

    Lami and M

    G. Lami and M. Collura, Nonstabilizerness via Perfect Pauli Sampling of Matrix Product States, Physical Re- view Letters131, 180401 (2023)

    2023

  67. [69]

    P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, and M. Dal- monte, Nonstabilizerness via Matrix Product States in the Pauli Basis, Physical Review Letters133, 010601 (2024)

    2024

  68. [70]

    G.-C. Li, L. Chen, S.-Q. Zhang, X.-S. Hong, H. Xu, Y. Liu, Y. Zhou, G. Chen, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, et al., Invested and potential magic resources in measurement- based quantum computation, Physical Review Letters 135, 160203 (2025)

    2025

  69. [71]

    Webb, The clifford group forms a unitary 3-design (2016), arXiv:1510.02769 [quant-ph]

    Z. Webb, The clifford group forms a unitary 3-design (2016), arXiv:1510.02769 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  70. [72]

    H. Zhu, R. Kueng, M. Grassl, and D. Gross, The clifford group fails gracefully to be a unitary 4-design (2016), arXiv:1609.08172 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  71. [73]

    Bittel, J

    L. Bittel, J. Eisert, L. Leone, A. A. Mele, and S. F. E. Oliviero, A complete theory of the clifford commutant (2025), arXiv:2504.12263 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [74]

    P. H. Westfall, Kurtosis as peakedness, 1905–2014. rip, The American Statistician68, 191 (2014)

    1905

  73. [75]

    Zhou and Q

    Y. Zhou and Q. Liu, Performance analysis of multi-shot shadow estimation, Quantum7, 1044 (2023)

    2023

  74. [76]

    See Supplementary Materials for more details

  75. [77]

    K. P. Balanda and H. MacGillivray, Kurtosis: a critical review, The American Statistician42, 111 (1988)

    1988

  76. [78]

    S. He, J. Zhang, and S. Zhang, Bounding probability of small deviation: A fourth moment approach, Mathemat- ics of Operations Research35, 208 (2010)

    2010

  77. [79]

    Zelen, Bounds on a distribution function that are functions of moments to order four1, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards53, 377 (1954)

    M. Zelen, Bounds on a distribution function that are functions of moments to order four1, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards53, 377 (1954)

    1954

  78. [80]

    Pearson, Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—xix

    K. Pearson, Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—xix. second supplement to a memoir on skew variation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathe- matical or Physical Character216, 429 (1916)

    1916

  79. [81]

    Toniolo and S

    D. Toniolo and S. Bose, Dynamicalα-r´ enyi entropies of local hamiltonians grow at most linearly in time, Phys. Rev. X15, 031046

  80. [82]

    Turkeshi, E

    X. Turkeshi, E. Tirrito, and P. Sierant, Magic spread- ing in random quantum circuits, Nature Communications 16, 10.1038/s41467-025-57704-x (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57704-x 2025

Showing first 80 references.