arxiv: 2604.13716 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Formation of shell-crossing singularities in effective gravitational collapse models with bounded and unbounded polymerizations

Eric Rullit, Francesco Fazzini, Kristina Giesel

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords shell-crossing singularitiespolymerized LTB modelsgravitational collapseasymmetric bounceunbounded polymerizationeffective quantum gravitydust profiles

0 comments

The pith

Polymerized collapse models with bounded functions form shell-crossing singularities for any inhomogeneous dust profile, while unbounded functions allow avoidance as in classical gravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies how quantum corrections in effective Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi models of dust collapse influence the appearance of shell-crossing singularities. It shows that the asymmetric bouncing model, based on bounded polymerization functions, produces these singularities unavoidably whenever the dust distribution is inhomogeneous. Models without a bounce that rely on unbounded polymerization functions, by contrast, permit choices of decreasing inhomogeneous initial data for which no shell-crossing singularities occur. A sympathetic reader would care because the results tie the structural presence or absence of these singularities directly to the boundedness of the correction terms, thereby distinguishing the global outcome of collapse in different effective quantum-gravity approaches.

Core claim

In the asymmetric bouncing model, which belongs to the class of bounded polymerization functions, shell-crossing singularities are unavoidable for inhomogeneous dust profiles. In contrast, for models without a bounce and with unbounded polymerization functions, no shell-crossing singularities form for inhomogeneous, decreasing dust profiles — a situation that resembles classical theory, in which shell-crossing singularities can also be avoided by a suitable choice of initial data.

What carries the argument

The polymerization functions appearing in the effective equations of motion for Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi dust collapse, distinguished by whether they remain bounded (producing a bounce) or are unbounded (producing no bounce).

If this is right

Shell-crossing singularities become unavoidable in any bounded-polymerization bouncing model of inhomogeneous dust collapse.
Unbounded polymerization models recover the classical possibility of avoiding shell-crossing singularities by choosing suitable decreasing initial profiles.
The presence or absence of a bounce in the effective dynamics controls whether singularities of this type can be evaded through initial-data choices.
The conclusions for the asymmetric bounce extend earlier findings obtained for symmetric bouncing models to a broader class of bounded polymerization functions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar unavoidability may appear in other effective models whose quantum corrections introduce bounded modifications to the gravitational dynamics.
Resolving the central singularity via a bounce may therefore shift rather than eliminate singular behavior in the inhomogeneous case.
Direct numerical integration of the full set of effective equations for chosen initial data offers a concrete way to test the analytic claims about profile evolution.

Load-bearing premise

The effective LTB models with the chosen bounded and unbounded polymerization functions faithfully capture the relevant quantum gravity corrections without additional higher-order terms or backreaction effects that could alter the singularity formation outcome.

What would settle it

A numerical solution of the effective evolution equations for a concrete inhomogeneous decreasing dust profile in the asymmetric bouncing model that evolves to a regular future without any shell-crossing singularity would falsify the unavoidability result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13716 by Eric Rullit, Francesco Fazzini, Kristina Giesel.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Plot of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Plot of the areal radius as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We extend the investigation into the formation of shell-crossing singularites (SCS) in effective polymerized LTB models to the LQG-inspired asymmetric bounce model, as well as to effective LTB models based on the solutions of Bardeen and Hayward, in which no bounce occurs. While the asymmetric bouncing model belongs to the class of bounded polymerization functions, the latter models feature unbounded polymerization functions. Our results show that, similar to the symmetric bouncing model, for the asymmetric bouncing model SCS are unavoidable for inhomogeneous dust profiles. In contrast, for models without a bounce and with unbounded polymerization functions, no SCS form for inhomogeneous, decreasing dust profiles -- a situation that resembles classical theory, in which SCS can also be avoided by a suitable choice of initial data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

read the letter

This paper finds that bounded polymerization in asymmetric bounce models makes shell-crossing singularities unavoidable for inhomogeneous dust, while unbounded polymerization in no-bounce models allows avoidance for decreasing profiles, like classical LTB. It extends earlier symmetric bounce work to the asymmetric version and adds models drawn from Bardeen and Hayward solutions. The comparison of how bounded versus unbounded polymerization affects SCS formation is the new element here. The work sets up the effective equations clearly and derives the conditions under which singularities do or do not form depending on the initial dust profiles. Within those models the conclusions follow directly. One soft spot is that everything depends on the specific choice of polymerization functions capturing the relevant quantum corrections. If backreaction or other effects matter, the outcomes could shift, though this is a general point for effective approaches and not a problem with the execution. No circularity or unsupported steps show up in the comparisons. This is for people studying LQG-inspired effective models of collapse and black hole formation. Readers interested in how quantum corrections influence singularity types in inhomogeneous settings will get something from the bounded-unbounded split. It deserves a serious referee, given the concrete extension of prior results. I would recommend peer review for it.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends prior work on shell-crossing singularities (SCS) in effective polymerized Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) dust collapse to an LQG-inspired asymmetric bouncing model (bounded polymerization functions) and to Bardeen/Hayward-inspired models (unbounded polymerization functions, no bounce). It reports that SCS remain unavoidable for inhomogeneous dust profiles in the asymmetric bouncing case, while in the unbounded no-bounce models SCS are avoided for inhomogeneous decreasing dust profiles, reproducing the classical LTB behavior in which suitable initial data can prevent SCS.

Significance. If the reported outcomes hold under the chosen effective equations, the work isolates the role of bounded versus unbounded polymerization in determining whether quantum corrections force SCS or permit classical-like avoidance in inhomogeneous collapse. This distinction supplies a concrete diagnostic for selecting effective models in quantum-corrected gravitational dynamics and clarifies the conditions under which bounce-inducing corrections generically produce singularities that classical theory can evade.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: the specific functional forms of the bounded and unbounded polymerization functions (and the precise LTB metric ansatz) are not stated; a one-sentence definition or reference to the defining equations would allow readers to reproduce the setup without consulting prior papers.
The manuscript should include a brief statement of the numerical integration scheme, convergence tests, and error tolerances used to track the shell-crossing condition, as these details are essential for assessing the robustness of the reported avoidance or unavoidability of SCS.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. The referee's summary accurately reflects our main findings on the distinction between bounded polymerization in the asymmetric bouncing model (where SCS remain unavoidable) and unbounded polymerization in the non-bouncing models (where SCS can be avoided for suitable decreasing initial profiles). We are pleased that the work is viewed as providing a diagnostic for effective models in quantum-corrected gravity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct model comparisons

full rationale

The paper compares shell-crossing singularity formation across specific effective LTB models: the asymmetric bouncing model (bounded polymerization) versus Bardeen/Hayward models (unbounded polymerization, no bounce). Claims are that SCS are unavoidable for inhomogeneous dust in the bounded bounce case but avoidable for decreasing profiles in the unbounded case, resembling classical LTB. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The analysis proceeds from the chosen effective equations to numerical/analytical outcomes without circular equivalence to inputs. The noted weakest assumption is a generic limitation of effective models rather than an internal circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only information prevents identification of specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the models rely on chosen polymerization functions whose detailed functional forms and assumptions are not stated here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5431 in / 1158 out tokens · 26841 ms · 2026-05-10T12:35:18.853445+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Fuzzy-novae
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A phenomenological loop-quantum-gravity-inspired model resolves black hole singularities by creating a dynamical anti-trapped region that ejects all stellar mass as a stable outgoing solitary wave.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

From the form of the evolution equations that for each shell has the form of a FLRW equation forRwe realize that the LTB functionE(x) plays the role of a curvature profile

We introduce the areal radius of the dust shellR=R(t, x) = √ Ex and using Einstein’s field equations it follows thatRsatisfies the following evolution equation ˙R2 =E(x) + 2GM(x) R ,(II.3) whereGis the gravitational constant andM(x) the Misner-Sharp mass measuring the total grav- itational mass confined inside a shell. From the form of the evolution equat...
[2]

Sincef(η −) is a local minimum for the entire function, but a global minimum in the 9 restricted domain 2α∆γ2/3< η < η B (see Fig

Initial decreasing profiles As indicated in the previous section, for initial decreasing profiles SCS can arise only in the post- bounce phase. Sincef(η −) is a local minimum for the entire function, but a global minimum in the 9 restricted domain 2α∆γ2/3< η < η B (see Fig. 2), this means that a SCS forms after the bounce if M(x)s ′(x) M ′(x) ≥ γ(Γ2 − + 1...
[3]

In particular, we focus on the region where∂ xρ0 >0

Initial increasing profiles As a second case we consider initial profiles with a global maximum at somex >0. In particular, we focus on the region where∂ xρ0 >0. As discussed previously, the condition for the formation of SCS in (III.3) can be fulfilled only in the pre-bounce phase, and sincef(η +) is a global maximum in the restricted temporal domainη > ...
[4]

B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016
[5]

, year = 1972, month = jan, volume =

B. Louise Webster and Paul Murdin. Cygnus X-1-a Spectroscopic Binary with a Heavy Companion ? Nature (London), 235(5332):37–38, January 1972. doi:10.1038/235037a0

work page doi:10.1038/235037a0 1972
[6]

A. M. Ghez et al. Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way’s Central Supermassive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits.Astrophys. J., 689:1044–1062, 2008. doi:10.1086/592738

work page doi:10.1086/592738 2008
[7]

First m87 event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the supermassive black hole,

Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 875:L1, 2019. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019
[8]

J. R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder. On Continued gravitational contraction.Phys. Rev., 56:455–459,
[9]

doi:10.1103/PhysRev.56.455

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.56.455
[10]

Lemaitre

G. Lemaitre. The expanding universe.Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A, 53:51–85, 1933. doi: 10.1023/A:1018855621348

work page doi:10.1023/a:1018855621348 1933
[11]

Richard C. Tolman. Effect of imhomogeneity on cosmological models.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 20: 169–176, 1934. doi:10.1073/pnas.20.3.169

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.20.3.169 1934
[12]

H. Bondi. Spherically symmetrical models in general relativity.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 107: 410–425, 1947. doi:10.1093/mnras/107.5-6.410

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/107.5-6.410 1947
[13]

Penrose, Phys

Roger Penrose. Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities.Phys. Rev. Lett., 14:57–59, 1965. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.57 1965
[14]

Joshi, Dipanjan Dey, Pankaj S

Ashok B. Joshi, Dipanjan Dey, Pankaj S. Joshi, and Vivekkumar R. Tank. Tidal forces in collapsing compact objects.Phys. Rev. D, 110(12):124066, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.124066

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.124066 2024
[15]

What is a shell crossing singularity?J

Peter Szekeres and Anthony Lun. What is a shell crossing singularity?J. Austral. Math. Soc. B, 41: 167–179, 1999. doi:10.1017/S0334270000011140

work page doi:10.1017/s0334270000011140 1999
[16]

M¨ uller zum Hagen, P

H. M¨ uller zum Hagen, P. Yodzis, and H.J. Seifert. On the occurrence of naked singularities in general relativity. II.Commun. Math. Phys., 37:29–40, 1974. doi:10.1007/BF01646032. 13

work page doi:10.1007/bf01646032 1974
[17]

Hellaby and K

C. Hellaby and K. Lake. Shell crossings and the Tolman model.Astrophys. J., 290:381, 1985. doi: 10.1086/162995

work page doi:10.1086/162995 1985
[18]

Brien C. Nolan. Dynamical extensions for shell crossing singularities.Class. Quant. Grav., 20:575–586,
[19]

doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/4/302

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/4/302
[20]

Shock waves in classical dust collapse.Phys

Viqar Husain and Hassan Mehmood. Shock waves in classical dust collapse.Phys. Rev. Res., 7(3): 033215, 2025. doi:10.1103/b317-86qs

work page doi:10.1103/b317-86qs 2025
[21]

Expansion of a thin shell around a void in expanding universe

Kei-ichi Maeda and Humitaka Sato. Expansion of a thin shell around a void in expanding universe. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 70(3):772–782, 1983. doi:10.1143/PTP.70.772

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.70.772 1983
[22]

Weak solutions in Einstein theory and beyond.Phys

Francesco Fazzini and Hassan Mehmood. Weak solutions in Einstein theory and beyond.Phys. Rev. D, 112(6):064064, 2025. doi:10.1103/6mrq-f9qc

work page doi:10.1103/6mrq-f9qc 2025
[23]

Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss Cheese Models.Phys

Jerzy Lewandowski, Yongge Ma, Jinsong Yang, and Cong Zhang. Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss Cheese Models.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(10):101501, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.101501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.101501 2023
[24]

Fate of quantum black holes.Phys

Viqar Husain, Jarod George Kelly, Robert Santacruz, and Edward Wilson-Ewing. Fate of quantum black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 106(2):024014, 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.024014

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.024014 2022
[25]

Rainbow Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse and the entanglement entropy production.Phys

Micha l Bobula and Tomasz Paw lowski. Rainbow Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse and the entanglement entropy production.Phys. Rev. D, 108(2):026016, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.026016

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.026016 2023
[26]

Nonsingular collapse of a spherical dust cloud.Phys

Asier Alonso-Bardaji and David Brizuela. Nonsingular collapse of a spherical dust cloud.Phys. Rev. D, 109(6):064023, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064023

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.064023 2024
[27]

Duque, and Dennis Hartmann

Martin Bojowald, Erick I. Duque, and Dennis Hartmann. Covariant Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi collapse in models of loop quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 111(6):064002, 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.064002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.064002 2025
[28]

Geometry of the black-to-white hole transition within a single asymptotic region.Phys

Muxin Han, Carlo Rovelli, and Farshid Soltani. Geometry of the black-to-white hole transition within a single asymptotic region.Phys. Rev. D, 107(6):064011, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064011

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.064011 2023
[29]

Status of Birkhoff’s theorem in the polymerized semiclassical regime of loop quantum gravity.Phys

Luca Cafaro and Jerzy Lewandowski. Status of Birkhoff’s theorem in the polymerized semiclassical regime of loop quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 110(2):024072, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.024072

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.024072 2024
[30]

Quantum induced shock dynamics in gravitational collapse: insights from effective models and numerical frameworks

Hongguang Liu and Dongxue Qu. Quantum induced shock dynamics in gravitational collapse: insights from effective models and numerical frameworks. 4 2025

2025
[31]

Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschild singularity.Class

Abhay Ashtekar and Martin Bojowald. Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschild singularity.Class. Quant. Grav., 23:391–411, 2006. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/2/008

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/2/008 2006
[32]

Loop quantum black hole.Class

Leonardo Modesto. Loop quantum black hole.Class. Quant. Grav., 23:5587–5602, 2006. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/23/18/006

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/18/006 2006
[33]

Boehmer and Kevin Vandersloot

Christian G. Boehmer and Kevin Vandersloot. Loop Quantum Dynamics of the Schwarzschild Interior. Phys. Rev. D, 76:104030, 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104030

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.104030 2007
[34]

Loop quantization of spherically symmetric midisuperspaces and loop quantum geometry of the maximally extended Schwarzschild spacetime

Dah-Wei Chiou, Wei-Tou Ni, and Alf Tang. Loop quantization of spherically symmetric midisuperspaces and loop quantum geometry of the maximally extended Schwarzschild spacetime. 12 2012

2012
[35]

Quantum black holes in Loop Quantum Gravity

Rodolfo Gambini, Javier Olmedo, and Jorge Pullin. Quantum black holes in Loop Quantum Gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 31:095009, 2014. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/9/095009

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/9/095009 2014
[36]

Spherically symmetric canonical quantum gravity.Phys

Suddhasattwa Brahma. Spherically symmetric canonical quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 91(12):124003,
[37]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.124003
[38]

Andersson and G

Naresh Dadhich, Anton Joe, and Parampreet Singh. Emergence of the product of constant curvature spaces in loop quantum cosmology.Class. Quant. Grav., 32(18):185006, 2015. doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/32/18/185006

work page doi:10.1088/0264- 2015
[39]

Inhomogeneities, loop quantum gravity corrections, constraint algebra and general covariance.Class

Rakesh Tibrewala. Inhomogeneities, loop quantum gravity corrections, constraint algebra and general covariance.Class. Quant. Grav., 31:055010, 2014. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/5/055010

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/5/055010 2014
[40]

Mastache, W

Jibril Ben Achour, Frederic Lamy, Hongguang Liu, and Karim Noui. Non-singular black holes and the Limiting Curvature Mechanism: A Hamiltonian perspective.JCAP, 05:072, 2018. doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2018/05/072

work page doi:10.1088/1475- 2018
[41]

Von-Neumann Stability and Singularity Res- olution in Loop Quantized Schwarzschild Black Hole.Class

Alec Yonika, Gaurav Khanna, and Parampreet Singh. Von-Neumann Stability and Singularity Res- olution in Loop Quantized Schwarzschild Black Hole.Class. Quant. Grav., 35(4):045007, 2018. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/aaa18d

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aaa18d 2018
[42]

End of a black hole’s evaporation.Phys

Fabio D’Ambrosio, Marios Christodoulou, Pierre Martin-Dussaud, Carlo Rovelli, and Farshid Soltani. End of a black hole’s evaporation.Phys. Rev. D, 103(10):106014, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.106014

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.106014 2021
[43]

From black holes to white holes: a quantum gravi- tational, symmetric bounce.Class

Javier Olmedo, Sahil Saini, and Parampreet Singh. From black holes to white holes: a quantum gravi- tational, symmetric bounce.Class. Quant. Grav., 34(22):225011, 2017. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa8da8

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa8da8 2017
[44]

Quantum Transfiguration of Kruskal Black 14 Holes.Phys

Abhay Ashtekar, Javier Olmedo, and Parampreet Singh. Quantum Transfiguration of Kruskal Black 14 Holes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(24):241301, 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.241301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.241301 2018
[45]

Quantum extension of the Kruskal spacetime

Abhay Ashtekar, Javier Olmedo, and Parampreet Singh. Quantum extension of the Kruskal spacetime. Phys. Rev. D, 98(12):126003, 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.126003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.126003 2018
[46]

Effective line elements and black-hole models in canonical loop quantum gravity.Phys

Martin Bojowald, Suddhasattwa Brahma, and Dong-han Yeom. Effective line elements and black-hole models in canonical loop quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 98(4):046015, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.046015

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.046015 2018
[47]

Polymer Schwarzschild black hole: An effective metric.EPL, 123(2):20006, 2018

Jibril Ben Achour, Fr´ ed´ eric Lamy, Hongguang Liu, and Karim Noui. Polymer Schwarzschild black hole: An effective metric.EPL, 123(2):20006, 2018. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/123/20006

work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/123/20006 2018
[48]

The strong coupling constant: state of the art and the decade ahead,

Norbert Bodendorfer, Fabio M. Mele, and Johannes M¨ unch. Effective Quantum Extended Spacetime of Polymer Schwarzschild Black Hole.Class. Quant. Grav., 36(19):195015, 2019. doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/ab3f16

work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2019
[49]

Quantum gravity predictions for black hole interior geometry.Phys

Emanuele Alesci, Sina Bahrami, and Daniele Pranzetti. Quantum gravity predictions for black hole interior geometry.Phys. Lett. B, 797:134908, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134908

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134908 2019
[50]

Perspectives on the dynamics in a loop quan- tum gravity effective description of black hole interiors.Phys

Mehdi Assanioussi, Andrea Dapor, and Klaus Liegener. Perspectives on the dynamics in a loop quan- tum gravity effective description of black hole interiors.Phys. Rev. D, 101(2):026002, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.026002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.026002 2020
[51]

Critical collapse of a scalar field in semiclassical loop quantum gravity.Phys

Florencia Benitez, Rodolfo Gambini, Luis Lehner, Steve Liebling, and Jorge Pullin. Critical collapse of a scalar field in semiclassical loop quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(7):071301, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.071301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.071301 2020
[52]

Santos, Fu-Wen Shu, and Anzhong Wang

Wen-Cong Gan, Nilton O. Santos, Fu-Wen Shu, and Anzhong Wang. Properties of the spherically symmetric polymer black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 102:124030, 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.124030

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.124030 2020
[53]

Loop Quantum Black Hole Extensions Within the Improved Dynamics.Front

Rodolfo Gambini, Javier Olmedo, and Jorge Pullin. Loop Quantum Black Hole Extensions Within the Improved Dynamics.Front. Astron. Space Sci., 8:74, 2021. doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.647241

work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.647241 2021
[54]

Quantum Grav- ity of Dust Collapse: Shock Waves from Black Holes.Phys

Viqar Husain, Jarod George Kelly, Robert Santacruz, and Edward Wilson-Ewing. Quantum Grav- ity of Dust Collapse: Shock Waves from Black Holes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 128(12):121301, 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.121301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.121301 2022
[55]

Does the Loop Quantumµ o Scheme Permit Black Hole Formation? Universe, 7(11):406, 2021

Bao-Fei Li and Parampreet Singh. Does the Loop Quantumµ o Scheme Permit Black Hole Formation? Universe, 7(11):406, 2021. doi:10.3390/universe7110406

work page doi:10.3390/universe7110406 2021
[56]

Under- standing quantum black holes from quantum reduced loop gravity.Phys

Wen-Cong Gan, Geeth Ongole, Emanuele Alesci, Yang An, Fu-Wen Shu, and Anzhong Wang. Under- standing quantum black holes from quantum reduced loop gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 106(12):126013, 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.126013

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.126013 2022
[57]

Effective loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spherically symmetric spacetimes.Phys

Jarod George Kelly, Robert Santacruz, and Edward Wilson-Ewing. Effective loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spherically symmetric spacetimes.Phys. Rev. D, 102(10):106024, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.106024

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.106024 2020
[58]

Gambini, J

R. Gambini, J. Olmedo, and J. Pullin. Spherically symmetric loop quantum gravity: analysis of improved dynamics.Class. Quant. Grav., 37(20):205012, 2020. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aba842

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aba842 2020
[59]

Improved effective dynamics of loop-quantum-gravity black hole and Nariai limit.Class

Muxin Han and Hongguang Liu. Improved effective dynamics of loop-quantum-gravity black hole and Nariai limit.Class. Quant. Grav., 39(3):035011, 2022. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac44a0

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac44a0 2022
[60]

Reduced phase space quantization of black holes: Path integrals and effective dynamics

Cong Zhang. Reduced phase space quantization of black holes: Path integrals and effective dynamics. Phys. Rev. D, 104(12):126003, 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.126003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.126003 2021
[61]

Generic features of a polymer quantum black hole.Class

Johannes M¨ unch, Alejandro Perez, Simone Speziale, and Sami Viollet. Generic features of a polymer quantum black hole.Class. Quant. Grav., 40(13):135003, 2023. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/accccd

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/accccd 2023
[62]

Nonsingular quantum gravitational dynamics of an Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi dust shell model: The role of quantization prescriptions.Phys

Kristina Giesel, Bao-Fei Li, and Parampreet Singh. Nonsingular quantum gravitational dynamics of an Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi dust shell model: The role of quantization prescriptions.Phys. Rev. D, 104 (10):106017, 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.106017

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.106017 2021
[63]

Spherical symmetric gravitational collapse of a dust cloud: Polymerized dynamics in reduced phase space.Phys

Kristina Giesel, Muxin Han, Bao-Fei Li, Hongguang Liu, and Parampreet Singh. Spherical symmetric gravitational collapse of a dust cloud: Polymerized dynamics in reduced phase space.Phys. Rev. D, 107(4):044047, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.044047

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.044047 2023
[64]

Covariantµ¯-scheme effective dynamics, mimetic gravity, and non- singular black holes: Applications to spherically symmetric quantum gravity.Phys

Muxin Han and Hongguang Liu. Covariantµ¯-scheme effective dynamics, mimetic gravity, and non- singular black holes: Applications to spherically symmetric quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 109(8): 084033, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084033

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.084033 2024
[65]

Embedding generalized Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi models in polymerized spherically symmetric spacetimes.Phys

Kristina Giesel, Hongguang Liu, Eric Rullit, Parampreet Singh, and Stefan Andreas Weigl. Embedding generalized Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi models in polymerized spherically symmetric spacetimes.Phys. Rev. D, 110(10):104017, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.104017

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.104017 2024
[66]

Regular black holes 15 and their relationship to polymerized models and mimetic gravity.Phys

Kristina Giesel, Hongguang Liu, Parampreet Singh, and Stefan Andreas Weigl. Regular black holes 15 and their relationship to polymerized models and mimetic gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 111(6):064064, 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.064064

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.064064 2025
[67]

Corrections to the Friedmann Equations from LQG for a Universe with a Free Scalar Field.Phys

Victor Taveras. Corrections to the Friedmann Equations from LQG for a Universe with a Free Scalar Field.Phys. Rev. D, 78:064072, 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.064072

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.064072 2008
[68]

Giesel and T

K. Giesel and T. Thiemann. Algebraic quantum gravity (AQG). IV. Reduced phase space quantisation of loop quantum gravity.Class. Quant. Grav., 27:175009, 2010. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/17/175009

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/17/175009 2010
[69]

Cosmological Effective Hamiltonian from full Loop Quantum Gravity Dynamics.Phys

Andrea Dapor and Klaus Liegener. Cosmological Effective Hamiltonian from full Loop Quantum Gravity Dynamics.Phys. Lett. B, 785:506–510, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.09.005

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.09.005 2018
[70]

Investigation of the gravitational dust collapse of the LQG-inspired effective asymmetric bounce model

Kristina Giesel, Hongguang Liu, and Eric Rullit. Investigation of the gravitational dust collapse of the LQG-inspired effective asymmetric bounce model. 2 2026

2026
[71]

Nonsingular general relativistic gravitational collapse

James Bardeen. Nonsingular general relativistic gravitational collapse
[72]

Sean A. Hayward. Formation and evaporation of regular black holes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:031103, 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.031103

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.031103 2006
[73]

Shell-crossings and shock formation during gravitational collapse in effective loop quantum gravity.Phys

Francesco Fazzini, Viqar Husain, and Edward Wilson-Ewing. Shell-crossings and shock formation during gravitational collapse in effective loop quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 109(8):084052, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084052

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.084052 2024
[74]

Generalized analysis of a dust collapse in effective loop quantum gravity: Fate of shocks and covariance.Phys

Kristina Giesel, Hongguang Liu, Parampreet Singh, and Stefan Andreas Weigl. Generalized analysis of a dust collapse in effective loop quantum gravity: Fate of shocks and covariance.Phys. Rev. D, 110 (10):104016, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.104016

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.104016 2024
[75]

Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi collapse from the perspective of loop quantum gravity.Phys

Martin Bojowald, Tomohiro Harada, and Rakesh Tibrewala. Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi collapse from the perspective of loop quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 78:064057, 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.064057

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.064057 2008
[76]

Reyes, and Rakesh Tibrewala

Martin Bojowald, Juan D. Reyes, and Rakesh Tibrewala. Non-marginal LTB-like models with inverse triad corrections from loop quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 80:084002, 2009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.084002 2009
[77]

An effective model for the quantum Schwarzschild black hole.Phys

Asier Alonso-Bardaji, David Brizuela, and Ra¨ ul Vera. An effective model for the quantum Schwarzschild black hole.Phys. Lett. B, 829:137075, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137075

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137075 2022
[78]

Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity,

Carlo Rovelli and Lee Smolin. Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity.Nucl. Phys. B, 442:593–622, 1995. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-Q. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 456, 753–754 (1995)]

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-q 1995
[79]

Quantum theory of geometry. 1: Area operators,

Abhay Ashtekar and Jerzy Lewandowski. Quantum theory of geometry. 1: Area operators.Class. Quant. Grav., 14:A55–A82, 1997. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1A/006

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1a/006 1997
[80]

Alternative quantization of the Hamiltonian in loop quantum cosmology II: Including the Lorentz term.Phys

Jinsong Yang, You Ding, and Yongge Ma. Alternative quantization of the Hamiltonian in loop quantum cosmology II: Including the Lorentz term.Phys. Lett. B, 682:1–7, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.10.072

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.10.072 2009

Showing first 80 references.