pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13832 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Gravitational emissions and light curves of quasi-periodic orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo

Shijie Tan , Chunhua Jiang , Dan Li , Shiyang Hu , Chen Deng , Wenbin Lin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords closed timelike orbitsgravitational waveslight curvesdark matter haloSchwarzschild spacetimeDehnen profileorbital phase lag
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dark matter halo parameters enlarge closed orbits around black holes and produce phase lags in their gravitational wave signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies strictly closed timelike orbits in a Schwarzschild black hole spacetime modified by a Dehnen-type dark matter halo. Solving the geodesic equations shows that orbit shapes are set by the ratio of azimuthal to radial periods. Halo core scale and density parameters increase the overall orbital size. This enlargement creates a clear phase lag in the gravitational waves emitted by the orbits. While gravitational wave signals struggle to reveal the number of leaves in the orbit, the electromagnetic light curves display distinct peaks that mark those structures. The results indicate that combined gravitational wave and light curve data could connect black hole environments to dark matter properties.

Core claim

In the Schwarzschild spacetime embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo, strictly closed timelike orbits exist and their morphologies are governed by the ratio of the azimuthal period to the radial period. The dark matter halo parameters amplify the orbital scale and thereby induce a discernible phase lag in the gravitational wave signals. Although the number of leaves in the orbital structures remains difficult to distinguish from gravitational wave signals alone, these structures produce identifiable signatures in the characteristic peaks of the associated electromagnetic light curves.

What carries the argument

The ratio of azimuthal period to radial period, which fixes the shape and leaf count of the closed timelike orbits in the combined metric.

If this is right

  • Halo core scale and density parameters increase the size of closed orbits.
  • The increased orbital scale produces measurable phase lags in gravitational wave signals.
  • Leaf counts in the orbits cannot be reliably extracted from gravitational waves alone.
  • Light curves exhibit distinct peaks that identify those leaf counts.
  • Multi-messenger signals from such orbits can link black hole environments to dark matter distributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Phase lags measured in future gravitational wave detections could be used to infer dark matter halo parameters.
  • Joint gravitational wave and electromagnetic monitoring might resolve ambiguities between different orbital leaf numbers.
  • The same period-ratio mechanism may produce analogous signatures in other dark matter halo models.

Load-bearing premise

Strictly closed timelike orbits exist and stay stable in the Schwarzschild metric with the embedded Dehnen dark matter halo.

What would settle it

Gravitational wave data from orbiting sources around a supermassive black hole that show no phase lag at the amplitudes predicted for realistic Dehnen halo parameters would falsify the claimed amplification effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13832 by Chen Deng, Chunhua Jiang, Dan Li, Shijie Tan, Shiyang Hu, Wenbin Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Evolution of the effective potential Veff(r) for different parameter spaces. From left to right, the panels display the effects of varying L (with (rs, ρs) = (0.1, 0.2) fixed), rs (with (ρs, L) = (0.2, 4) fixed), and ρs (with (rs, L) = (0.5, 4.5) fixed). The results indicate that the bound orbit regions are expanded by the specific angular momentum but suppressed by the dark matter halo parameters. Further… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of the ISCO radius risco as a function of the dark matter halo parameters rs and ρs. The ISCO radius increases with both parameters, though the impact of the scale parameter is notably more significant. are determined by the conditions: ∂Veff ∂r = 0, (22) ∂ 2Veff ∂r2 < 0. (23) In this context, we focus on the marginally bound orbit (MBO), which is defined by the specific energy condi￾tion Veff… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Evolution of ˙r 2 with respect to r in different parameter spaces. The first row displays results for rs = 0.2 with ρs set to 0.1, 0.4, and 0.7 (from left to right), while the second row shows results for ρs = 0.2 with rs varying as 0.1, 0.4, and 0.7. In each panel, the curves from bottom to top correspond to specific energy E increasing from 0.95 to 0.98 with an interval of 0.005. Each curve is calculated… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relationship between the allowed specific energy range and specific angular momentum for bound orbits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relationship between the specific energy range and specific angular momentum for bound orbits under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of the rational number q as a function of specific energy E across different parameter spaces. From left to right, the panels correspond to ε = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5. The upper row shows results for fixed rs = 0.2 with ρs varying from 0.1 to 0.4 (black, red, blue, and green curves, respectively). The lower row displays results for fixed ρs = 0.2 with rs varying from 0.3 to 0.6. All curves exhibit … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Strictly closed orbits and their precessing counterparts under various dark matter halo parameters and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Influence of the parameter ε on the orbital configuration. From the innermost to the outermost curves, ε takes the values 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7, respectively. Here, the dark matter halo parameters are fixed at (rs, ρs) = (0.2, 0.2), and the orbital configuration is set to (z, w, v) = (3, 1, 2). It is observed that increasing ε expands the orbital scale while preserving the original configuration. peaks wi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Closed orbits (left column) and the corresponding gravitational wave waveforms (right column) across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Light curves of closed orbits with varying numbers of leaves at different observation inclination angles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Timelike orbits in curved spacetimes encode intrinsic information about the background geometry and serve as critical probes for investigating gravitational theories and source distributions. In this study, we investigate strictly closed timelike orbits within a Schwarzschild spacetime embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo. By solving the geodesic equations, we identify various configurations of these closed orbits and simulate their corresponding gravitational waves and electromagnetic light curves. Our findings reveal that the morphology of closed orbits is primarily governed by the ratio of the azimuthal period to the radial period. Notably, dark matter halo parameters such as the core scale and density parameters exert a significant amplification effect on the orbital scale, which further induces a discernible phase lag in the gravitational wave signals. Furthermore, although certain orbital structures including the number of leaves remain challenging to distinguish via gravitational wave signals alone, they exhibit identifiable signatures in the characteristic peaks of light curves. These findings reveal the multi-messenger potential of closed orbits in bridging black hole environments and dark matter properties, providing theoretical guidance for future dark matter searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines strictly closed timelike orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo. It solves the geodesic equations to identify orbit configurations, simulates the associated gravitational-wave signals and electromagnetic light curves, and reports that the halo's core scale and density parameters amplify orbital scales, producing observable phase lags in the GW signals while light-curve peaks distinguish orbital leaf structures that GWs alone cannot resolve.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work would offer a concrete multi-messenger framework linking black-hole environments to dark-matter halo properties via phase lags and light-curve morphology. However, the absence of demonstrated exact period commensurability, stability analysis, and quantitative error estimates substantially reduces the immediate impact; the claimed amplification and distinguishability remain provisional until these elements are supplied.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and title: the abstract repeatedly asserts the existence of 'strictly closed timelike orbits' whose radial-to-azimuthal period ratio is rational, yet the title refers to 'quasi-periodic orbits'. In the pure Schwarzschild metric bound timelike geodesics precess; the Dehnen halo modifies the effective potential, but the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the chosen core-radius and density parameters render the periods exactly commensurate (e.g., via numerical integration showing closure to machine precision after many radial periods) rather than merely approximately periodic. Without this demonstration the reported phase lag and leaf-number signatures do not follow.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that geodesic equations were solved and signals simulated, yet the provided information contains no convergence tests, step-size studies, or comparison against known Schwarzschild limits (e.g., the exact precession rate for a given energy and angular momentum). Consequently the claimed amplification effect on orbital scale and the distinguishability of light-curve peaks cannot be assessed for numerical reliability.
  3. [Abstract] The load-bearing assumption that the chosen halo parameters produce orbits that remain stable against small perturbations is not addressed. Stability must be verified (second derivative of the effective potential or Lyapunov exponents) before the multi-messenger signatures can be regarded as observationally relevant; the current presentation leaves this unexamined.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript should supply error bars or uncertainty estimates on all reported phase lags and peak positions, together with the specific numerical integrator and tolerance settings used.
  2. Notation for the Dehnen halo parameters (core scale, density) should be defined once in the text and used consistently; the abstract introduces them without explicit symbols.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. These have highlighted important areas where the manuscript can be strengthened with additional demonstrations of numerical accuracy and stability. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and title: the abstract repeatedly asserts the existence of 'strictly closed timelike orbits' whose radial-to-azimuthal period ratio is rational, yet the title refers to 'quasi-periodic orbits'. In the pure Schwarzschild metric bound timelike geodesics precess; the Dehnen halo modifies the effective potential, but the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the chosen core-radius and density parameters render the periods exactly commensurate (e.g., via numerical integration showing closure to machine precision after many radial periods) rather than merely approximately periodic. Without this demonstration the reported phase lag and leaf-number signatures do not follow.

    Authors: We agree that the title and abstract terminology should be aligned and that explicit demonstration of exact period commensurability is required. The manuscript selects specific Dehnen halo parameters for which the radial-to-azimuthal period ratio is rational, yielding strictly closed orbits; the title employs 'quasi-periodic' in the broader sense of the spacetime class. To address the concern, we will revise the title to 'Gravitational emissions and light curves of closed timelike orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo' and add a new subsection with numerical integration results. These will show that, for the reported core scale and density values, the orbit closes to machine precision (azimuthal and radial mismatch below 10^{-12}) after an integer number of radial periods, confirming the phase lags and leaf structures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that geodesic equations were solved and signals simulated, yet the provided information contains no convergence tests, step-size studies, or comparison against known Schwarzschild limits (e.g., the exact precession rate for a given energy and angular momentum). Consequently the claimed amplification effect on orbital scale and the distinguishability of light-curve peaks cannot be assessed for numerical reliability.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative validation of the numerical scheme is essential. The revised manuscript will include a dedicated numerical methods subsection reporting the geodesic integration algorithm, step-size convergence tests (showing orbital frequencies stable to better than 0.1% under refinement), and direct comparisons to the analytic Schwarzschild periastron precession rate in the zero-halo-density limit. These additions will confirm the reliability of the reported orbital-scale amplification and the resulting gravitational-wave phase lags. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] The load-bearing assumption that the chosen halo parameters produce orbits that remain stable against small perturbations is not addressed. Stability must be verified (second derivative of the effective potential or Lyapunov exponents) before the multi-messenger signatures can be regarded as observationally relevant; the current presentation leaves this unexamined.

    Authors: We recognize that stability must be explicitly verified for the results to be observationally relevant. In the revision we will add an analysis of the effective potential, demonstrating that its second derivative is positive at the radial turning points for the chosen energies and angular momenta. We will also report Lyapunov exponents (computed via the variational equations) showing no exponential divergence for the selected halo parameters, thereby confirming local stability of the closed orbits and supporting the multi-messenger signatures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations rest on explicit numerical integration of geodesics

full rationale

The paper solves the geodesic equations in the Schwarzschild-plus-Dehnen metric, identifies closed orbits via the ratio of azimuthal to radial periods, and computes GW waveforms and light curves from those trajectories. No equation or claim reduces a reported effect (phase lag, amplification, light-curve peaks) to a quantity defined by the same halo parameters or by a self-citation chain. The central results follow from direct integration rather than from fitting a parameter to a subset of the output data and relabeling it a prediction. Self-citations, if present, are not invoked to establish uniqueness or to smuggle in an ansatz that carries the load-bearing step. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard geodesic equation in a static spherically symmetric metric, the Dehnen density profile taken from prior astrophysical literature, and the assumption that numerical integration of the orbit equations yields strictly closed solutions for the chosen parameter ranges.

free parameters (2)
  • core scale parameter
    Controls the radial extent of the dark matter halo and is stated to amplify orbital size; its specific numerical value is not given in the abstract.
  • density parameter
    Sets the central density of the halo and is reported to produce observable phase lags; value not supplied in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Timelike geodesics in the Schwarzschild-plus-Dehnen metric obey the standard geodesic equation derived from the metric
    Invoked when the authors state they solve the geodesic equations to find closed orbits.
  • domain assumption The Dehnen profile accurately represents the dark matter distribution around the black hole
    The entire analysis is performed inside this specific halo model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5501 in / 1506 out tokens · 46966 ms · 2026-05-10T12:31:39.645845+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 121 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collabora- tion, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(6), 061102 (2016). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875(1), L1 (2019). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  3. [3]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First Sagittar- ius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930(2), L12 (2022). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2022

  4. [4]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    GRAVITY Collaboration, Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole, Astron. Astrophys.615, L15 (2018). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201833718

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833718 2018

  5. [5]

    A. Hees, T. Do, A.M. Ghez, G.D. Martinez, S. Naoz, E.E. Becklin, A. Boehle, S. Chappell, D. Chu, A. De- hghanfar, K. Kosmo, J.R. Lu, K. Matthews, M.R. Morris, S. Sakai, R. Sch¨ odel, G. Witzel, Testing General Relativity with Stellar Orbits around the Supermassive Black Hole in Our Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(21), 211101 (2017). DOI 10.1103/PhysR...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.211101 2017

  6. [6]

    Grould, F.H

    M. Grould, F.H. Vincent, T. Paumard, G. Perrin, Gen- eral relativistic effects on the orbit of the S2 star with GRAVITY, Astron. Astrophys.608, A60 (2017). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201731148

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731148 2017

  7. [7]

    Baub¨ ock et al

    GRAVITY Collaboration, Modeling the orbital motion of Sgr A*’s near-infrared flares, Astron. Astrophys.635, A143 (2020). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201937233

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937233 2020

  8. [8]

    Einasto, A

    J. Einasto, A. Kaasik, E. Saar, Dynamic evidence on massive coronas of galaxies, Nature250(5464), 309 (1974). DOI 10.1038/250309a0

    work page doi:10.1038/250309a0 1974

  9. [9]

    Rubin, W.K

    V.C. Rubin, W.K. Ford, Jr., N. Thonnard, Extended rotation curves of high-luminosity spiral galaxies. IV. Systematic dynamical properties, Sa - Sc., Phys. Rev. Lett.225, L107 (1978). DOI 10.1086/182804

    work page doi:10.1086/182804 1978

  10. [10]

    Clowe, A

    D. Clowe, A. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, Weak-Lensing Mass Reconstruction of the Interacting Cluster 1E 0657- 558: Direct Evidence for the Existence of Dark Matter, Astrophys. J.604(2), 596 (2004). DOI 10.1086/381970

    work page doi:10.1086/381970 2004

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    D. Clowe, M. Bradaˇ c, A.H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S.W. Randall, C. Jones, D. Zaritsky, A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.648(2), L109 (2006). DOI 10.1086/508162

    work page doi:10.1086/508162 2006

  12. [12]

    M.C. Chen, T. Broadhurst, J. Lim, S.M. Molnar, J.M. Diego, M. Oguri, L.L. Lee, Geometric Support for Dark Matter by an Unaligned Einstein Ring in A3827, As- trophys. J.898(1), 81 (2020). DOI 10.3847/1538- 4357/ab9ebc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2020

  13. [13]

    Moffat, V.T

    J.W. Moffat, V.T. Toth, Applying modified grav- ity to the lensing and Einstein ring in Abell 3827, Phys. Rev. D103(4), 044045 (2021). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044045

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.044045 2021

  14. [14]

    2018, Rev

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, History of dark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.90(4), 045002 (2018). DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 2018

  15. [18]

    Konoplya, Shadow of a black hole surrounded by dark matter, Phys

    R.A. Konoplya, Shadow of a black hole surrounded by dark matter, Phys. Lett. B795, 1 (2019). DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.043

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.043 2019

  16. [19]

    Jusufi, M

    K. Jusufi, M. Jamil, P. Salucci, T. Zhu, S. Haroon, Black Hole Surrounded by a Dark Matter Halo in the M87 Galactic Center and its Identification with Shadow Images, Phys. Rev. D100(4), 044012 (2019). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.044012 2019

  17. [20]

    Haroon, M

    S. Haroon, M. Jamil, K. Jusufi, K. Lin, R.B. Mann, Shadow and Deflection Angle of Rotating Black Holes in Perfect Fluid Dark Matter with a Cosmological Con- stant, Phys. Rev. D99(4), 044015 (2019). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.044015 2019

  18. [21]

    Z. Xu, X. Gong, S.N. Zhang, Black hole immersed dark matter halo, Phys. Rev. D101(2), 024029 (2020). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.024029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.024029 2020

  19. [22]

    Narzilloev, J

    B. Narzilloev, J. Rayimbaev, S. Shaymatov, A. Abdu- jabbarov, B. Ahmedov, C. Bambi, Dynamics of test par- ticles around a Bardeen black hole surrounded by per- fect fluid dark matter, Phys. Rev. D102(10), 104062 (2020). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104062 15

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.104062 2020

  20. [23]

    Jusufi, Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes Sur- rounded by Dark Matter and Their Connection with the Shadow Radius, Phys

    K. Jusufi, Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes Sur- rounded by Dark Matter and Their Connection with the Shadow Radius, Phys. Rev. D101(8), 084055 (2020). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084055

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.084055 2020

  21. [26]

    Shaymatov, D

    S. Shaymatov, D. Malafarina, B. Ahmedov, Effect of perfect fluid dark matter on particle motion around a static black hole immersed in an external magnetic field, Phys. Dark Univ.34, 100891 (2021). DOI 10.1016/j.dark.2021.100891

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100891 2021

  22. [27]

    Atamurotov, A

    F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, W.B. Han, Effect of plasma on gravitational lensing by a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in perfect fluid dark mat- ter, Phys. Rev. D104(8), 084015 (2021). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.084015 2021

  23. [28]

    Saurabh, K

    K. Saurabh, K. Jusufi, Imprints of dark matter on black hole shadows using spherical accretions, Eur. Phys. J. C 81(6), 490 (2021). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09280- 9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09280- 2021

  24. [29]

    Stuchl´ ık, J

    Z. Stuchl´ ık, J. Vrba, Supermassive black holes sur- rounded by dark matter modeled as anisotropic fluid: epicyclic oscillations and their fitting to observed QPOs, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.11(11), 059 (2021). DOI 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/059

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/059 2021

  25. [30]

    Zeng, K.J

    X.X. Zeng, K.J. He, G.P. Li, Effects of dark matter on shadows and rings of Brane-World black holes illumi- nated by various accretions, Sci. China Phys. Mech. As- tron.65(9), 290411 (2022). DOI 10.1007/s11433-022- 1896-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-022- 2022

  26. [31]

    J. Liu, S. Chen, J. Jing, Tidal effects of a dark mat- ter halo around a galactic black hole*, Chin. Phys. C 46(10), 105104 (2022). DOI 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7856

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac7856 2022

  27. [32]

    Kurmanov, K

    E. Kurmanov, K. Boshkayev, R. Giamb` o, T. Konys- bayev, O. Luongo, D. Malafarina, H. Quevedo, Accre- tion Disk Luminosity for Black Holes Surrounded by Dark Matter with Anisotropic Pressure, Astrophys. J. 925(2), 210 (2022). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ac41d4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac41d4 2022

  28. [33]

    Heydari-Fard, S.G

    M. Heydari-Fard, S.G. Honarvar, M. Heydari-Fard, Thin accretion disc luminosity and its image around ro- tating black holes in perfect fluid dark matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.521(1), 708 (2023). DOI 10.1093/mnras/stad558

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad558 2023

  29. [34]

    D. Liu, Y. Yang, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Z.W. Long, Z. Xu, Gravita- tional ringing and superradiant instabilities of the Kerr- like black holes in a dark matter halo, Eur. Phys. J. C 83(7), 565 (2023). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11739- w

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11739- 2023

  30. [35]

    X. Qin, S. Chen, Z. Zhang, J. Jing, Polarized image of a rotating black hole surrounded by a cold dark mat- ter halo, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2), 159 (2023). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11300-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11300-9 2023

  31. [36]

    ¨Ovg¨ un, L.J.F

    A. ¨Ovg¨ un, L.J.F. Sese, R.C. Pantig, Constraints via the Event Horizon Telescope for Black Hole Solutions with Dark Matter under the Generalized Uncertainty Prin- ciple Minimal Length Scale Effect, Ann. Phys.536(4), 2300390 (2024). DOI 10.1002/andp.202300390

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.202300390 2024

  32. [37]

    Y. Feng, A. Ashraf, S. Mumtaz, S.K. Maurya, G. Mustafa, F. Atamurotov, Orbital motion and epicyclic oscillations around Bardeen black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter, J. High Energy Astrop.43, 158 (2024). DOI 10.1016/j.jheap.2024.07.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.07.003 2024

  33. [38]

    Zeng, C.Y

    X.X. Zeng, C.Y. Yang, M.I. Aslam, R. Saleem, S. Aslam, Kerr-like black hole surrounded by cold dark mat- ter halo: the shadow images and EHT constraints, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.08, 066 (2025). DOI 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/066

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/066 2025

  34. [39]

    K.J. He, G.P. Li, C.Y. Yang, X.X. Zeng, Observational features of the rotating Bardeen black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C85(6), 662 (2025). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14391-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14391-8 2025

  35. [40]

    Aslam, R

    M.I. Aslam, R. Saleem, C.Y. Yang, X.X. Zeng, Im- prints of dark matter on the shadow and polarization images of a black hole illuminated by various thick disks, J. High Energy Astrop.51, 100551 (2026). DOI 10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100551

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100551 2026

  36. [41]

    J.R. Bond, G. Efstathiou, Cosmic background radia- tion anisotropies in universes dominated by nonbaryonic dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.285, L45 (1984). DOI 10.1086/184362

    work page doi:10.1086/184362 1984

  37. [42]

    F., Frenk, C

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk, S.D.M. White, The Struc- ture of Cold Dark Matter Halos, Astrophys. J.462, 563 (1996). DOI 10.1086/177173

    work page doi:10.1086/177173 1996

  38. [43]

    Einasto, U

    J. Einasto, U. Haud, Galactic models with massive corona. I - Method. II - Galaxy, Astron. Astrophys. 223(1-2), 89 (1989)

    1989

  39. [44]

    1995, ApJL, 447, L25, doi: 10.1086/309560

    A. Burkert, The Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Dwarf Galaxies, Astrophys. J. Lett.447, L25 (1995). DOI 10.1086/309560

    work page doi:10.1086/309560 1995

  40. [45]

    Dehnen, A Family of Potential-Density Pairs for Spherical Galaxies and Bulges, Mon

    W. Dehnen, A Family of Potential-Density Pairs for Spherical Galaxies and Bulges, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.265, 250 (1993). DOI 10.1093/mnras/265.1.250

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/265.1.250 1993

  41. [46]

    Gohain, P

    M.M. Gohain, P. Phukon, K. Bhuyan, Thermody- namics and null geodesics of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a Dehnen type dark matter halo, Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101683 (2024). DOI 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101683

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101683 2024

  42. [47]

    Alloqulov, T

    M. Alloqulov, T. Xamidov, S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, Gravitational waveforms from periodic orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo, Eur. Phys. J. C85(7), 798 (2025). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14529-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14529-8 2025

  43. [48]

    Al-Badawi, S

    A. Al-Badawi, S. Shaymatov, Quasinormal modes and shadow of Schwarzschild black holes embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo exhibiting a cloud of strings, Commun. Theor. Phys.77(3), 035402 (2025). DOI 10.1088/1572-9494/ad89b2

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ad89b2 2025

  44. [50]

    Predictions for bottomonium from a relativistic screened potential model,

    A. Al-Badawi, S. Shaymatov, Astrophysical properties of static black holes embedded in a Dehnen type dark matter halo with the presence of quintessential field, Chin. Phys. C49(5), 055101 (2025). DOI 10.1088/1674- 1137/adb2fd

    work page doi:10.1088/1674- 2025

  45. [51]

    Hamil, A

    B. Hamil, A. Al-Badawi, B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Geodesics and scalar perturbations of Schwarzschild black holes embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo with quintessence, Phys. Scripta.100(10), 105008 (2025). DOI 10.1088/1402-4896/ae0ed7

    work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae0ed7 2025

  46. [52]

    L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, A

    B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, A. Shermatov, J. Rayimbaev, M. Maty- oqubov, O. Sirajiddin, Gravitational spectra and wave propagation in regular black holes supported by a 16 Dehnen Halo, Eur. Phys. J. C85(12), 1484 (2025). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15234-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15234-2 2025

  47. [53]

    Z. Li, J. Yu, Observational properties of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a Dehnen-type dark mat- ter halo, Eur. Phys. J. C85(10), 1170 (2025). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14911-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14911-6 2025

  48. [54]

    Liang, D

    Q.Q. Liang, D. Liu, Z.W. Long, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black holes in the Dehnen-(1, 4, 5/2) type dark matter halos, Eur. Phys. J. C85(10), 1107 (2025). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14850-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14850-2 2025

  49. [56]

    Senjaya, Black hole in Dehnen (1,4,1/2) dark mat- ter halo: exact solution, lensing, light ring, and thermo- dynamics, Eur

    D. Senjaya, Black hole in Dehnen (1,4,1/2) dark mat- ter halo: exact solution, lensing, light ring, and thermo- dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C85(11), 1256 (2025). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15005-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15005-z 2025

  50. [57]

    Ashoorioon, R

    A. Ashoorioon, R. Casadio, K. Jafarzade, M.B. Jahani Poshteh, O. Luongo, Gravitational radiation reaction around a static black hole surrounded by a Dehnen type dark matter halo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2026(2), 007 (2026). DOI 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/007

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/007 2026

  51. [58]

    Massey, L

    R. Massey, L. Williams, R. Smit, M. Swinbank, T.D. Kitching, D. Harvey, M. Jauzac, H. Israel, D. Clowe, A. Edge, M. Hilton, E. Jullo, A. Leonard, J. Liesen- borgs, J. Merten, I. Mohammed, D. Nagai, J. Richard, A. Robertson, P. Saha, R. Santana, J. Stott, E. Titt- ley, The behaviour of dark matter associated with four bright cluster galaxies in the 10 kpc ...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv467 2015

  52. [59]

    Massey, D

    R. Massey, D. Harvey, J. Liesenborgs, J. Richard, S. Stach, M. Swinbank, P. Taylor, L. Williams, D. Clowe, F. Courbin, A. Edge, H. Israel, M. Jauzac, R. Joseph, E. Jullo, T.D. Kitching, A. Leonard, J. Merten, D. Nagai, J. Nightingale, A. Robertson, L.J. Romualdez, P. Saha, R. Smit, S.I. Tam, E. Tittley, Dark matter dynamics in Abell 3827: new data consist...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty630 2018

  53. [60]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmo- logical parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020). DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  54. [61]

    Delos, T

    M.S. Delos, T. Linden, Dark matter microhalos in the solar neighborhood: Pulsar timing signatures of early matter domination, Phys. Rev. D105(12), 123514 (2022). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123514

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.123514 2022

  55. [62]

    M., Sun, B., Yan, H., et al

    J.M. Diego, B. Sun, H. Yan, L.J. Furtak, E. Zackrisson, L. Dai, P. Kelly, M. Nonino, N. Adams, A.K. Meena, S.P. Willner, A. Zitrin, S.H. Cohen, J.C.J. D’Silva, R.A. Jansen, J. Summers, R.A. Windhorst, D. Coe, C.J. Conselice, S.P. Driver, B. Frye, N.A. Grogin, A.M. Koekemoer, M.A. Marshall, N. Pirzkal, A. Robotham, M.J. Rutkowski, R.E. Ryan, S. Tompkins, C...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347556 2023

  56. [63]

    D.D. Li, Q. Liu, G.M. Eadie, R.G. Abraham, F.R. Mar- leau, W.E. Harris, P. van Dokkum, A.J. Romanowsky, S. Danieli, P.E. Brown, A. Stringer, Candidate Dark Galaxy-2: Validation and Analysis of an Almost Dark Galaxy in the Perseus Cluster, Astrophys. J. Lett. 986(2), L18 (2025). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/adddab

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adddab 2025

  57. [64]

    M.M. Muru, J. Silk, N.I. Libeskind, S. Gottl¨ ober, Y. Hoffman, Fermi-LAT Galactic Center Excess Mor- phology of Dark Matter in Simulations of the Milky Way Galaxy, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(16), 161005 (2025). DOI 10.1103/g9qz-h8wd

    work page doi:10.1103/g9qz-h8wd 2025

  58. [65]

    Totani, JCAP11, 080 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/080 [arXiv:2507.07209 [astro-ph.HE]]

    T. Totani, 20 GeV halo-like excess of the Galactic diffuse emission and implications for dark matter annihilation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025(11), 080 (2025). DOI 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/080

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/080 2025

  59. [66]

    Powell, J.P

    D.M. Powell, J.P. McKean, S. Vegetti, C. Spingola, S.D.M. White, C.D. Fassnacht, A million-solar-mass ob- ject detected at a cosmological distance using gravi- tational imaging, Nat. Astron.9, 1714 (2025). DOI 10.1038/s41550-025-02651-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02651-2 2025

  60. [67]

    Y. Chen, M. Daniel, D.J. D’Orazio, X. Fan, A. Mitri- date, L. Sagunski, X. Xue, Nanograv Collaboration, G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A.M. Archibald, Z. Ar- zoumanian, J.G. Baier, P.T. Baker, B. B´ ecsy, L. Blecha, A. Brazier, P.R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, R. Burnette, J.A. Casey-Clyde, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, T. Cohen, J.M. Cordes, N.J. Cornish, F. Craw...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-026-02782-0 2026

  61. [68]

    Jacobson, T.P

    T. Jacobson, T.P. Sotiriou, Spinning Black Holes as Particle Accelerators, Phys. Rev. Lett.104(2), 021101 (2010). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.021101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.021101 2010

  62. [69]

    Wei, Y.X

    S.W. Wei, Y.X. Liu, H. Guo, C.E. Fu, Charged spinning black holes as particle accelerators, Phys. Rev. D82(10), 103005 (2010). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.103005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.103005 2010

  63. [70]

    M. Guo, S. Gao, Kerr black holes as accelerators of spin- ning test particles, Phys. Rev. D93(8), 084025 (2016). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084025

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.084025 2016

  64. [71]

    Takahashi, H

    M. Takahashi, H. Koyama, Chaotic Motion of Charged Particles in an Electromagnetic Field Surrounding a Ro- tating Black Hole, Astrophys. J.693(1), 472 (2009). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/472

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/472 2009

  65. [72]

    The Astrophysical Journal745(2), 174 (2012)

    O. Kop´ aˇ cek, V. Karas, Inducing Chaos by Breaking Axial Symmetry in a Black Hole Magnetosphere, As- trophys. J.787(2), 117 (2014). DOI 10.1088/0004- 637X/787/2/117

    work page doi:10.1088/0004- 2014

  66. [73]

    P´ anis, M

    R. P´ anis, M. Koloˇ s, Z. Stuchl´ ık, Determination of chaotic behaviour in time series generated by charged particle motion around magnetized Schwarzschild black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C79(6), 479 (2019). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6961-7 17

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6961-7 2019

  67. [74]

    D. Li, X. Wu, Chaotic motion of neutral and charged particles in a magnetized Ernst-Schwarzschild space- time, Eur. Phys. J. Plus134(3), 96 (2019). DOI 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12502-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/i2019-12502-9 2019

  68. [75]

    S. Hu, X. Wu, E. Liang, Construction of a Second- order Six-dimensional Hamiltonian-conserving Scheme, Astrophys. J. Suppl. S.257(2), 40 (2021). DOI 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1ff3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac1ff3 2021

  69. [76]

    W. Sun, Y. Wang, F. Liu, X. Wu, Applying explicit symplectic integrator to study chaos of charged particles around magnetized Kerr black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C 81(9), 785 (2021). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09579- 7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09579- 2021

  70. [77]

    Y. Wang, W. Sun, F. Liu, X. Wu, Construction of Ex- plicit Symplectic Integrators in General Relativity. II. Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Holes, Astrophys. J.909(1), 22 (2021). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/abd701

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd701 2021

  71. [78]

    Y. Wang, W. Sun, F. Liu, X. Wu, Construction of Explicit Symplectic Integrators in General Relativity. III. Reissner–Nordstr¨ om-(anti)-de Sitter Black Holes, Astrophys. J. Suppl. S.254(1), 8 (2021). DOI 10.3847/1538-4365/abf116

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abf116 2021

  72. [79]

    Huang, G

    Z. Huang, G. Huang, A. Hu, Application of Ex- plicit Symplectic Integrators in a Magnetized Deformed Schwarzschild Black Spacetime, Astrophys. J.925(2), 158 (2022). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3edf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3edf 2022

  73. [80]

    Zhang, S

    L. Zhang, S. Chen, Q. Pan, J. Jing, Chaotic motion of scalar particle coupling to Chern–Simons invariant in the stationary axisymmetric Einstein–Maxwell dilaton black hole spacetime, Eur. Phys. J. C83(9), 828 (2023). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12008-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12008-6 2023

  74. [81]

    Z. Xu, D. Ma, W. Cao, K. Li, Chaotic motion of charged test particles in a Kerr-MOG black hole with explicit symplectic algorithms, Eur. Phys. J. C85(7), 770 (2025). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14425-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14425-1 2025

  75. [82]

    D. Cao, L. Zhang, S. Chen, Q. Pan, J. Jing, Chaotic motion of particles around a dyonic Kerr– Newman black hole immersed in the Melvin-swirling universe, Eur. Phys. J. C85(11), 1250 (2025). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15002-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15002-2 2025

  76. [83]

    Stuchl´ ık, M

    Z. Stuchl´ ık, M. Koloˇ s, Acceleration of the charged par- ticles due to chaotic scattering in the combined black hole gravitational field and asymptotically uniform mag- netic field, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 32 (2016). DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3862-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3862-2 2016

  77. [84]

    Levin, G

    J. Levin, G. Perez-Giz, A periodic table for black hole orbits, Phys. Rev. D77(10), 103005 (2008). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.103005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.103005 2008

  78. [85]

    Misra, J

    V. Misra, J. Levin, Rational Orbits around Charged Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D82, 083001 (2010). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.083001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.083001 2010

  79. [86]

    Babar, A.Z

    G.Z. Babar, A.Z. Babar, Y.K. Lim, Periodic or- bits around a spherically symmetric naked singular- ity, Phys. Rev. D96(8), 084052 (2017). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.084052

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.084052 2017

  80. [87]

    S.W. Wei, J. Yang, Y.X. Liu, Geodesics and periodic or- bits in Kehagias-Sfetsos black holes in deformed Hoˇ rava- Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Rev. D99(10), 104016 (2019). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.104016 2019

Showing first 80 references.