pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14134 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

Giacomo Brunello, Jan Steinhoff, Manoj K. Mandal, Matteo Pegorin, Pierpaolo Mastrolia, Raj Patil, Sid Smith

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph
keywords post-Newtonian gravitytwo-body gravitational dynamicsstatic limitfactorization theoremcorrelation functionsZ2 symmetryall-order formulaseventh post-Newtonian potential
0
0 comments X

The pith

A closed formula computes static two-body gravitational potentials at any odd post-Newtonian order once lower orders are known.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a closed formula that produces static post-Newtonian corrections to the two-body gravitational dynamics at every odd order, provided the results at lower orders are already available. This formula arises in a correlation-function framework by using the Z2 symmetry of the static sector. The work supplies a new theoretical view of the factorization theorem that organizes these interactions. A reader would care because the formula lets one reach the seventh post-Newtonian order directly from prior results and confirms agreement with an independent diagrammatic method.

Core claim

The paper presents a closed formula for static post-Newtonian corrections to two-body gravitational dynamics at any odd order, assuming lower-order results are known. It is derived in a correlation-function framework that exploits the Z2 symmetry of the static sector. This leads to a novel interpretation of the factorization theorem. Applying the formula yields the seventh post-Newtonian static potential from seven-loop graphs, which matches the result from the diagrammatic factorization theorem approach.

What carries the argument

the closed all-order formula obtained by exploiting the Z2 symmetry of the static sector within the correlation-function framework

If this is right

  • The static seventh post-Newtonian potential follows directly from the formula applied to known lower-order terms.
  • Complete agreement holds with the diagrammatic factorization theorem approach at seventh order.
  • The formula supplies a novel theoretical interpretation of the factorization theorem in terms of correlation functions.
  • Any higher odd post-Newtonian order becomes accessible by iterating the formula with known lower-order inputs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The correlation-function perspective could serve as a complementary route for organizing higher-order static terms without redrawing every diagram.
  • The same Z2 symmetry argument might extend to produce closed expressions in other symmetric sectors of gravitational effective theories.
  • The method reduces the need to recompute the full set of graphs when advancing from one odd order to the next.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that lower-order results are already known and that the Z2 symmetry of the static sector can be exploited within the correlation-function framework to produce a valid all-order formula.

What would settle it

An independent calculation of the static potential at the ninth post-Newtonian order that disagrees with the output of this closed formula would show the formula to be incorrect.

read the original abstract

We present a closed formula for the computation of static post-Newtonian corrections to the two-body gravitational dynamics at any odd order, assuming the lower-order results are known. The formula is derived within a correlation function framework and exploits the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry of the static sector, leading to a novel theoretical interpretation of the factorization theorem. As an application, we compute the gravitational interaction of two compact coalescing objects at the seventh post-Newtonian order in the static limit, which receives contributions from seven-loop graphs at order $\mathcal{O}(G_N^8 v^0)$, and find complete agreement with the results obtained using the diagrammatic approach of the factorization theorem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a closed formula for computing static post-Newtonian corrections to two-body gravitational dynamics at arbitrary odd orders, derived in a correlation-function framework by exploiting the Z_2 symmetry of the static sector (assuming lower-order results are known). As an application, the seventh post-Newtonian static potential is computed from seven-loop graphs at O(G_N^8 v^0) and shown to agree completely with an independent diagrammatic calculation based on the factorization theorem.

Significance. If the central formula holds, the work supplies a valuable all-order recursive structure for the static sector of the post-Newtonian expansion, which could streamline calculations of higher-order terms in binary dynamics relevant to gravitational-wave astronomy. The explicit cross-validation at 7PN against a separate diagrammatic method provides non-trivial support for the symmetry-based construction and offers a novel theoretical interpretation of the factorization theorem.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of the closed formula] The derivation of the closed recursive formula (in the section presenting the all-order expression) relies on the Z_2 symmetry to relate correlation functions; the manuscript should explicitly show how this symmetry closes the recursion without additional assumptions beyond the stated lower-order inputs, ideally with a concrete example relating the 5PN and 7PN terms.
  2. [7PN application] Table or section reporting the 7PN result: while complete agreement with the factorization-theorem diagrammatic result is stated, the paper should list the explicit numerical coefficient or functional form obtained from the new formula (including the precise lower-order inputs used) to permit direct verification of the cross-check.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction could briefly recall the explicit form of the 7PN term (or its leading coefficient) for immediate context, rather than only stating agreement.
  2. [Notation and conventions] Notation for the post-Newtonian order and the static limit should be defined once early in the text and used consistently, especially when distinguishing v^0 terms from velocity-dependent contributions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation for minor revision. The comments are constructive and help improve the clarity of the presentation. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Derivation of the closed formula] The derivation of the closed recursive formula (in the section presenting the all-order expression) relies on the Z_2 symmetry to relate correlation functions; the manuscript should explicitly show how this symmetry closes the recursion without additional assumptions beyond the stated lower-order inputs, ideally with a concrete example relating the 5PN and 7PN terms.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit walkthrough would enhance transparency. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a dedicated paragraph in the all-order section that applies the Z_2 symmetry step by step to relate the 5PN and 7PN correlation functions. This illustrates that the recursion closes using only the symmetry and the assumed lower-order results, without further assumptions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [7PN application] Table or section reporting the 7PN result: while complete agreement with the factorization-theorem diagrammatic result is stated, the paper should list the explicit numerical coefficient or functional form obtained from the new formula (including the precise lower-order inputs used) to permit direct verification of the cross-check.

    Authors: We appreciate the request for explicit verifiability. The revised version now includes, in the 7PN section, the explicit coefficient obtained from the closed formula together with the precise lower-order inputs that were employed. This permits direct comparison with the independent diagrammatic result and confirms the stated agreement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: recursive formula derived from Z2 symmetry with independent 7PN cross-validation

full rationale

The paper derives an explicit closed recursive formula for odd-order static PN corrections inside the correlation-function framework by exploiting the static sector's Z2 symmetry. This formula takes lower-order results as explicit inputs (as stated in the abstract) and is applied to obtain the 7PN term, which is then shown to match results from a separate diagrammatic factorization-theorem method. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain; the derivation is self-contained against the external benchmark of the independent diagrammatic computation, and the assumption of known lower orders is declared upfront without creating circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the correlation-function framework, the Z2 symmetry of the static sector, and the factorization theorem; lower-order results are treated as known inputs rather than re-derived.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The static sector of the two-body gravitational dynamics admits a Z2 symmetry that can be exploited within the correlation-function framework.
    Invoked to derive the closed formula for odd orders.
  • domain assumption Lower-order post-Newtonian results are already known and can be used as input.
    Explicitly stated as an assumption for the all-order formula.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5432 in / 1310 out tokens · 39810 ms · 2026-05-10T12:47:48.570591+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

  2. Black Hole Response Theory and its Exact Shockwave Limit

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Black hole response theory in WQFT exactly reproduces the Aichelburg-Sexl shockwave metric, geodesics, and the transfer matrix for gravitational-wave scattering off it via post-Minkowskian resummation.

  3. Black Hole Dynamics at Fifth Post-Newtonian Order

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives 5PN scattering observables and a conservative Hamiltonian contribution for black holes that determines EOB parameters d5loc and a6loc.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

151 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Com- pact Binaries,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

  2. [2]

    GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW-E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Ob- servatory, VINROUGE, MASTER), “A gravitational- wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble con- stant,” Nature551, 85–88 (2017), arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]

  4. [4]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo,, KAGRA, VIRGO), Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion His- tory from GWTC–3, Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KA- GRA), “Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion His- tory from GWTC–3,” Astrophys. J.949, 76 (2023), arXiv:2111.03604 [astro-ph.CO]

  5. [5]

    G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation,” (2025), arXiv:2509.04348 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    Tests of general relativity with GW150914,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Tests of general relativity with GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the sec- ond LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,” Phys. Rev. D103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr- qc]

  8. [8]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,” Phys. Rev. D112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), “GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    Waveform ac- curacy and systematic uncertainties in current gravi- tational wave observations,

    Caroline B. Owen, Carl-Johan Haster, Scott Perkins, Neil J. Cornish, and Nicol´ as Yunes, “Waveform ac- curacy and systematic uncertainties in current gravi- tational wave observations,” Phys. Rev. D108, 044018 (2023), arXiv:2301.11941 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    Dhani, S

    Arnab Dhani, Sebastian H. V¨ olkel, Alessandra Buo- nanno, Hector Estelles, Jonathan Gair, Harald P. Pfeif- fer, Lorenzo Pompili, and Alexandre Toubiana, “Sys- tematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models,” Phys. Rev. X15, 031036 (2025), arXiv:2404.05811 [gr- qc]

  12. [12]

    GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265M ⊙,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with To- tal Mass 190–265 M ⊙,” Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L25 (2025), arXiv:2507.08219 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    Evolution of binary black hole space- 10 times,

    Frans Pretorius, “Evolution of binary black hole space- 10 times,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 121101 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0507014

  14. [14]

    Campanelli, C

    Manuela Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, P. Marronetti, and Y. Zlochower, “Accurate evolutions of orbiting black- hole binaries without excision,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 111101 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511048

  15. [15]

    Gravitational wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merg- ing black holes,

    John G. Baker, Joan Centrella, Dae-Il Choi, Michael Koppitz, and James van Meter, “Gravitational wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merg- ing black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 111102 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511103

  16. [16]

    The motion of a system of bodies under the influence of their mutual attraction, according to Einstein’s theory,

    Hendrik Antoon Lorentz and Johannes Droste, “The motion of a system of bodies under the influence of their mutual attraction, according to Einstein’s theory,” Page 330. Nijhoff, The Hague, 1937. Versl. K. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam 26, 392 and 649 (1917)

  17. [17]

    The Gravitational equations and the problem of motion,

    Albert Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, “The Gravitational equations and the problem of motion,” Annals Math.39, 65–100 (1938)

  18. [18]

    The post- Newtonian approximation for relativistic compact bi- naries,

    Toshifumi Futamase and Yousuke Itoh, “The post- Newtonian approximation for relativistic compact bi- naries,” Living Rev. Rel.10, 2 (2007)

  19. [19]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    Luc Blanchet, “Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravi- tational Waves,” Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,

    Rafael A. Porto, “The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,” Phys. Rept.633, 1–104 (2016), arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    Sch¨ afer and P

    Gerhard Sch¨ afer and Piotr Jaranowski, “Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity and post-Newtonian dynamics of compact binaries,” Living Rev. Rel.21, 7 (2018), arXiv:1805.07240 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,Rept

    Mich` ele Levi, “Effective Field Theories of Post- Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,” Rept. Prog. Phys.83, 075901 (2020), arXiv:1807.01699 [hep- th]

  23. [23]

    3rd post-Newtonian highe r order Hamilton dynamics for two-body point-mass systems

    Piotr Jaranowski and Gerhard Schaefer, “Third post- Newtonian higher order ADM Hamilton dynamics for two-body point mass systems,” Phys. Rev. D57, 7274– 7291 (1998), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 63, 029902 (2001)], arXiv:gr-qc/9712075

  24. [24]

    Damour, P

    Thibault Damour, Piotr Jaranowski, and Gerhard Sch¨ afer, “Nonlocal-in-time action for the fourth post- Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. D89, 064058 (2014), arXiv:1401.4548 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Derivation of local-in-time fourth post-Newtonian ADM Hamiltonian for spinless compact binaries,

    Piotr Jaranowski and Gerhard Sch¨ afer, “Derivation of local-in-time fourth post-Newtonian ADM Hamiltonian for spinless compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D92, 124043 (2015), arXiv:1508.01016 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Fokker action of nonspinning compact binaries at the fourth post- Newtonian approximation,

    Laura Bernard, Luc Blanchet, Alejandro Boh´ e, Guil- laume Faye, and Sylvain Marsat, “Fokker action of nonspinning compact binaries at the fourth post- Newtonian approximation,” Phys. Rev. D93, 084037 (2016), arXiv:1512.02876 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    Energy and peri- astron advance of compact binaries on circular orbits at the fourth post-Newtonian order,

    Laura Bernard, Luc Blanchet, Alejandro Boh´ e, Guil- laume Faye, and Sylvain Marsat, “Energy and peri- astron advance of compact binaries on circular orbits at the fourth post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D95, 044026 (2017), arXiv:1610.07934 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    Conservative dynamics of two-body systems at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation of gen- eral relativity,

    Thibault Damour, Piotr Jaranowski, and Gerhard Sch¨ afer, “Conservative dynamics of two-body systems at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation of gen- eral relativity,” Phys. Rev. D93, 084014 (2016), arXiv:1601.01283 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    Blanchet, G

    Luc Blanchet, Guillaume Faye, Quentin Henry, Fran¸ cois Larrouturou, and David Trestini, “Gravitational- wave flux and quadrupole modes from quasicircu- lar nonspinning compact binaries to the fourth post- Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D108, 064041 (2023), arXiv:2304.11186 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Blanchet, G

    Luc Blanchet, Guillaume Faye, Quentin Henry, Fran¸ cois Larrouturou, and David Trestini, “Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Quasicircular Compact Binary Systems to the Fourth-and-a-Half Post-Newtonian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 121402 (2023), arXiv:2304.11185 [gr- qc]

  31. [31]

    GRAVITATIONAL SCATTERING OF TWO RELATIVISTIC PARTI- CLES IN POSTLINEAR APPROXIMATION,

    K. Westpfahl and M. Goller, “GRAVITATIONAL SCATTERING OF TWO RELATIVISTIC PARTI- CLES IN POSTLINEAR APPROXIMATION,” Lett. Nuovo Cim.26, 573–576 (1979)

  32. [32]

    GRAVITATIONAL BREMSSTRAHLUNG IN POSTLINEAR FAST MO- TION APPROXIMATION,

    K. Westpfahl and H. Hoyler, “GRAVITATIONAL BREMSSTRAHLUNG IN POSTLINEAR FAST MO- TION APPROXIMATION,” Lett. Nuovo Cim.27, 581– 585 (1980)

  33. [33]

    Poincar´ e-invariant gravitational field and equations of motion of two pointlike objects: The post- linear approximation of general relativity,

    LLuis Bel, T. Damour, N. Deruelle, J. Ibanez, and J. Martin, “Poincar´ e-invariant gravitational field and equations of motion of two pointlike objects: The post- linear approximation of general relativity,” Gen. Rel. Grav.13, 963–1004 (1981)

  34. [34]

    High-Speed Scattering of Charged and Uncharged Particles in General Relativ- ity,

    Konradin Westpfahl, “High-Speed Scattering of Charged and Uncharged Particles in General Relativ- ity,” Fortsch. Phys.33, 417–493 (1985)

  35. [35]

    The adm hamiltonian at the postlin- ear approximation,

    Gerhard Sch¨ afer, “The adm hamiltonian at the postlin- ear approximation,” General relativity and gravitation 18, 255–270 (1986)

  36. [36]

    Relativistic Closed-Form Hamiltonian for Many- Body Gravitating Systems in the Post-Minkowskian Ap- proximation,

    Tomas Ledvinka, Gerhard Schaefer, and Jiri Bi- cak, “Relativistic Closed-Form Hamiltonian for Many- Body Gravitating Systems in the Post-Minkowskian Ap- proximation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 251101 (2008), arXiv:0807.0214 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    Buonanno, M

    Alessandra Buonanno, Mohammed Khalil, Donal O’Connell, Radu Roiban, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng, “Snowmass White Paper: Gravitational Waves and Scattering Amplitudes,” inSnowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2204.05194 [hep-th]

  38. [38]

    Travaglini et al., J

    Gabriele Travagliniet al., “The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes,” J. Phys. A55, 443001 (2022), arXiv:2203.13011 [hep-th]

  39. [39]

    The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, “The SAGEX review on scattering ampli- tudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes,” J. Phys. A55, 443014 (2022), arXiv:2203.13024 [hep-th]

  40. [40]

    The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scattering amplitudes,

    David A. Kosower, Ricardo Monteiro, and Donal O’Connell, “The SAGEX review on scattering am- plitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scat- tering amplitudes,” J. Phys. A55, 443015 (2022), arXiv:2203.13025 [hep-th]

  41. [41]

    Damour,Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,Phys

    Thibault Damour, “Gravitational scattering, post- Minkowskian approximation and Effective One- Body theory,” Phys. Rev. D94, 104015 (2016), arXiv:1609.00354 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Cheung, I

    Clifford Cheung, Ira Z. Rothstein, and Mikhail P. Solon, “From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Poten- tials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251101 (2018), arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    Scattering Am- plitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,

    Zvi Bern, Clifford Cheung, Radu Roiban, Chia-Hsien 11 Shen, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng, “Scattering Am- plitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

  44. [44]

    Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2),

    Zvi Bern, Dimitrios Kosmopoulos, Andr´ es Luna, Radu Roiban, and Fei Teng, “Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2),” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 201402 (2023), arXiv:2203.06202 [hep-th]

  45. [45]

    Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO G5 , and loop integration,

    Zvi Bern, Enrico Herrmann, Radu Roiban, Michael S. Ruf, Alexander V. Smirnov, Vladimir A. Smirnov, and Mao Zeng, “Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO G5 , and loop integration,” JHEP10, 023 (2024), arXiv:2406.01554 [hep-th]

  46. [46]

    Kosower, B

    David A. Kosower, Ben Maybee, and Donal O’Connell, “Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,” JHEP02, 137 (2019), arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

  47. [47]

    Bjerrum-Bohr, P.H

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, Poul H. Damgaard, Guido Fes- tuccia, Ludovic Plant´ e, and Pierre Vanhove, “Gen- eral Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 171601 (2018), arXiv:1806.04920 [hep-th]

  48. [48]

    Post-Minkowskian Hamiltonians in general relativity,

    Andrea Cristofoli, N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, Poul H. Damgaard, and Pierre Vanhove, “Post-Minkowskian Hamiltonians in general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D100, 084040 (2019), arXiv:1906.01579 [hep-th]

  49. [49]

    Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory,

    Poul H. Damgaard, Kays Haddad, and Andreas Helset, “Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory,” JHEP11, 070 (2019), arXiv:1908.10308 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Brandhuber, G

    Andreas Brandhuber, Gang Chen, Gabriele Travaglini, and Congkao Wen, “Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,” JHEP10, 118 (2021), arXiv:2108.04216 [hep-th]

  51. [51]

    Vines,Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,Class

    Justin Vines, “Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,” Class. Quant. Grav.35, 084002 (2018), arXiv:1709.06016 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    K¨ alin and R

    Gregor K¨ alin and Rafael A. Porto, “Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynam- ics,” JHEP11, 106 (2020), arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]

  53. [53]

    K¨ alin, Z

    Gregor K¨ alin, Zhengwen Liu, and Rafael A. Porto, “Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field The- ory Approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 261103 (2020), arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]

  54. [54]

    Mogull, J

    Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Jan Steinhoff, “Classi- cal black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,” JHEP02, 048 (2021), arXiv:2010.02865 [hep- th]

  55. [55]

    SUSY in the sky with gravitons,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Jan Steinhoff, “SUSY in the sky with gravitons,” JHEP 01, 027 (2022), arXiv:2109.04465 [hep-th]

  56. [56]

    Fast Neutrino Flavor Conversions Can Prevent and Defer Supernova Explosions

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Benjamin Sauer, “All things retarded: radiation- reaction in worldline quantum field theory,” JHEP10, 128 (2022), arXiv:2207.00569 [hep-th]

  57. [57]

    Driesse, G

    Mathias Driesse, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, and Johann Uso- vitsch, “Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 241402 (2024), arXiv:2403.07781 [hep- th]

  58. [58]

    K¨ alin, J

    Gregor K¨ alin, Jakob Neef, and Rafael A. Porto, “Radiation-reaction in the Effective Field Theory ap- proach to Post-Minkowskian dynamics,” JHEP01, 140 (2023), arXiv:2207.00580 [hep-th]

  59. [59]

    Driesse, G

    Mathias Driesse, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Albrecht Klemm, Gustav Mogull, Christoph Nega, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, and Johann Usovitsch, “Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scat- tering,” Nature641, 603–607 (2025), arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

  60. [60]

    Second-order self-force potential-region bi- nary dynamics atO(G 5) in supergravity,

    Zvi Bern, Enrico Herrmann, Radu Roiban, Michael S. Ruf, Alexander V. Smirnov, Vladimir A. Smirnov, and Mao Zeng, “Second-order self-force potential-region bi- nary dynamics atO(G 5) in supergravity,” (2025), arXiv:2509.17412 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    Dlapa, G

    Christoph Dlapa, Gregor K¨ alin, Zhengwen Liu, and Rafael A. Porto, “Local-in-Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self- Force Orders,” (2025), arXiv:2506.20665 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    K¨ alin and R

    Gregor K¨ alin and Rafael A. Porto, “From Bound- ary Data to Bound States,” JHEP01, 072 (2020), arXiv:1910.03008 [hep-th]

  63. [63]

    Dlapa, G

    Christoph Dlapa, Gregor K¨ alin, Zhengwen Liu, and Rafael A. Porto, “Local in Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 221401 (2024), arXiv:2403.04853 [hep- th]

  64. [64]

    Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 5) without Self-Force Truncation,

    Zvi Bern, Enrico Herrmann, Radu Roiban, Michael S. Ruf, Alexander V. Smirnov, Sid Smith, and Mao Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 5) without Self-Force Truncation,” (2025), arXiv:2512.23654 [hep-th]

  65. [65]

    Driesse, G

    Mathias Driesse, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Christoph Nega, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, and Johann Usovitsch, “Conservative Black Hole Scat- tering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order,” (2026), arXiv:2601.16256 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    Gravitational radiation reaction to a particle mo- tion,

    Yasushi Mino, Misao Sasaki, and Takahiro Tanaka, “Gravitational radiation reaction to a particle mo- tion,” Phys. Rev. D55, 3457–3476 (1997), arXiv:gr- qc/9606018

  67. [67]

    An Ax- iomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravita- tional radiation reaction of particles in curved space- time,

    Theodore C. Quinn and Robert M. Wald, “An Ax- iomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravita- tional radiation reaction of particles in curved space- time,” Phys. Rev. D56, 3381–3394 (1997), arXiv:gr- qc/9610053

  68. [68]

    Calculating the gravitational selfforce in Schwarzschild space-time,

    Leor Barack, Yasushi Mino, Hiroyuki Nakano, Amos Ori, and Misao Sasaki, “Calculating the gravitational selfforce in Schwarzschild space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091101 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0111001

  69. [69]

    Gravitational selfforce on a particle orbiting a Kerr black hole,

    Leor Barack and Amos Ori, “Gravitational selfforce on a particle orbiting a Kerr black hole,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 111101 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0212103

  70. [70]

    A Rigorous Derivation of Gravitational Self-force,

    Samuel E. Gralla and Robert M. Wald, “A Rigorous Derivation of Gravitational Self-force,” Class. Quant. Grav.25, 205009 (2008), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 28, 159501 (2011)], arXiv:0806.3293 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    A Consequence of the gravitational self-force for circular orbits of the Schwarzschild geometry,

    Steven L. Detweiler, “A Consequence of the gravitational self-force for circular orbits of the Schwarzschild geometry,” Phys. Rev. D77, 124026 (2008), arXiv:0804.3529 [gr-qc]

  72. [72]

    Gravi- tational Self-force in a Radiation Gauge,

    Tobias S. Keidl, Abhay G. Shah, John L. Fried- man, Dong-Hoon Kim, and Larry R. Price, “Gravi- tational Self-force in a Radiation Gauge,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 124012 (2010), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 109902 (2014)], arXiv:1004.2276 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    van de Meent,Gravitational self-force on generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime,Phys

    Maarten van de Meent, “Gravitational self-force on generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime,” Phys. Rev. 12 D97, 104033 (2018), arXiv:1711.09607 [gr-qc]

  74. [74]

    Second-order gravitational self-force,

    Adam Pound, “Second-order gravitational self-force,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 051101 (2012), arXiv:1201.5089 [gr-qc]

  75. [75]

    Pound, B

    Adam Pound, Barry Wardell, Niels Warburton, and Jeremy Miller, “Second-Order Self-Force Calculation of Gravitational Binding Energy in Compact Binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 021101 (2020), arXiv:1908.07419 [gr-qc]

  76. [76]

    Self-force effects in post-Minkowskian scattering,

    Samuel E. Gralla and Kunal Lobo, “Self-force effects in post-Minkowskian scattering,” Class. Quant. Grav.39, 095001 (2022), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 41, 179501 (2024)], arXiv:2110.08681 [gr-qc]

  77. [77]

    Pound and B

    Adam Pound and Barry Wardell, “Black hole pertur- bation theory and gravitational self-force,” (2021), arXiv:2101.04592 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    Warburton, A

    Niels Warburton, Adam Pound, Barry Wardell, Jeremy Miller, and Leanne Durkan, “Gravitational-Wave En- ergy Flux for Compact Binaries through Second Or- der in the Mass Ratio,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151102 (2021), arXiv:2107.01298 [gr-qc]

  79. [79]

    Wardell, A

    Barry Wardell, Adam Pound, Niels Warburton, Jeremy Miller, Leanne Durkan, and Alexandre Le Tiec, “Grav- itational Waveforms for Compact Binaries from Second- Order Self-Force Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2112.12265 [gr-qc]

  80. [80]

    Ajith et al., Phenomenological template family for black-hole coalescence waveforms, Class

    Parameswaran Ajithet al., “Phenomenological template family for black-hole coalescence waveforms,” Class. Quant. Grav.24, S689–S700 (2007), arXiv:0704.3764 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.