Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate

As of 13 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 18 of 18 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2604.14210.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2604.14210 v1

Coverage vector

measured 18 of 18 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z

measured 20 of 20 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T08:21:50.124329Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-07-08T07:04:44.512087Z

Reference resolution

18 of 18 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact7
  • verified fuzzy8
  • unresolved1
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch2

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 48840421-f425-457e-b08d-d096b2645ea5 · outbound

This paper cites Chinese is more efficient for llm coding - try it now!https://www.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Chinese is more efficient for llm coding - try it now!https://www

Reference 1

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.237803Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:5283b780481973b2a6cadbe39ac78d7d8a93d3e15459be84e8cf3300a39c7909

Observation ad7d91c2-6ea4-46d4-995f-16a518508888 · outbound

This paper cites Raising the bar on swe- bench verified with claude 3.5 sonnet.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Raising the bar on swe- bench verified with claude 3.5 sonnet

Reference 2

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.232485Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:66269e8c48907de757958766e930d172a089354d739af3559b48d4dcf92674af

Observation f253861b-61b8-40ae-9e61-df4920e7e8a9 · outbound

This paper cites Japanese is the most expensive language in terms of input to- kens.https://dylancastillo.co/ til/counting-tokens.html.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Japanese is the most expensive language in terms of input to- kens.https://dylancastillo.co/ til/counting-tokens.html

Reference 3

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.240824Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:e20ecb77d61f3cd735a6c8a0a9d40a36c8b618ca0c2518dd186551230cd0aaee

Observation f11b55d5-bfd1-47f1-b332-b3e6c6ce5fa0 · outbound

This paper cites Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

Reference 4

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.469730Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:28f3202bb7088e3e26a856f7dbd0c57c4d962c4c376894ec7fa25127bc57db8b

Observation 41504501-48dc-4a61-8f04-ecbc205418e6 · outbound

This paper cites Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpaca.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpaca

Reference 5

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.487194Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:37453d594b73e1e9f4446b5483195dcc9d5f1999d9e306692445a05ed61b7b7a

Observation 3bce6aed-a694-4777-b803-7fde9d45564e · outbound

This paper cites Quenching jets increases their flavor.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Quenching jets increases their flavor

Reference 6

Resolution
metadata mismatch
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.460386Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:1465b8042d9d6affe03d9340264a09d72ec899005332919106fc7aaa79dea55a

Observation f1fdad8c-1d74-4add-ab52-4c4cac062876 · outbound

This paper cites Chiral Optical Tamm States at the Interface between a Cholesteric and an All-Dielectric Polarization-Preserving Anisotropic Mirror.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Chiral Optical Tamm States at the Interface between a Cholesteric and an All-Dielectric Polarization-Preserving Anisotropic Mirror

Reference 7

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.450358Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:c4203841ed582273e819ddd1d352e2d325a8e4b05822f69ba65c22509e209580

Observation 112913ba-b579-444c-85c2-6780b6613e8c · outbound

This paper cites Introducing swe-bench ver- ified.https://openai.com/ index/introducing-swe-bench- verified/.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Introducing swe-bench ver- ified.https://openai.com/ index/introducing-swe-bench- verified/

Reference 8

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.227893Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:15bb159e7552879673078c70cfc8f63b04c75b04f6614340ee84953b9127543d

Observation 2a1bd74d-8c88-46ad-b401-a8602273a9ee · outbound

This paper cites HumanEval-XL: A Multilingual Code Generation Benchmark for Cross-lingual Natural Language Generalization.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate HumanEval-XL: A Multilingual Code Generation Benchmark for Cross-lingual Natural Language Generalization

Reference 9

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.479693Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:87269e9dde14a79539712c77de8dbde998fc3b7152d841e966f1902a94229d6c

Observation 3f210d52-71ee-4ae2-a504-ece0ca3fd940 · outbound

This paper cites Torr, and Adel Bibi.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Torr, and Adel Bibi

Reference 10

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.224330Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:9a06569b29b5888f2394989fc0a393a92b170dda193b575662a2e0e63018e65e

Observation 76eb942f-3704-4f1d-a878-c2e45878c0cf · outbound

This paper cites How multilingual is multilingual BERT? In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4996–5001.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate How multilingual is multilingual BERT? In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4996–5001

Reference 11

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.220556Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:c9af89024663262e794b4f554314dd8e6bf881fd17982ba14f3e56c2f0955648

Observation cb21f107-d2e3-4536-9811-0e18f47db918 · outbound

This paper cites Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units

Reference 12

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-12T15:15:20.428834Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:fd1f74526f0f3be5301eafa997ed0027cb478aa76329cd39bfdd94fd03afca98

Observation e22fcfc5-8fad-4c25-8b05-e802a9342063 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Unresolved cited work

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.223257Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:e5fbf76be6985d7252ea825b64927f620f797442c1e53dd81da069929970c137

Observation 68080db7-e7e6-4343-a039-96322ed1141c · outbound

This paper cites AI — 2025 stack Over- flow developer survey.https://survey.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate AI — 2025 stack Over- flow developer survey.https://survey

Reference 14

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.218373Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:58df58fc57b2c0bb0dd824bbc4c9fd99aa1e0fead308bd150def8c358e7569de

Observation b95c88b4-8db2-45ca-91a6-3cade658bb4d · outbound

This paper cites engines of growth.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate engines of growth

Reference 15

Resolution
metadata mismatch
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.420180Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:8c5f02a72307169f85186eddd70f0b9e9a07100b18fecbb00f72c9168335aad2

Observation 1fa520f8-8d84-4506-88fe-2c2fa04b3d79 · outbound

This paper cites Eight months in, Swedish unicorn Lovable crosses the $100M ARR milestone.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Eight months in, Swedish unicorn Lovable crosses the $100M ARR milestone

Reference 16

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T05:50:41.215683Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:355d303eafb05e81b6f12b18e11e887626531f7695eb94991abe0af2286ca878

Observation 93b76f58-7ba2-4a7c-affc-32154c46ce26 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen2 Technical Report.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate Qwen2 Technical Report

Reference 17

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.411454Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:0997617cec47b7db813061c428fe7e9e04c5e4e3691c5b3f51fafeace2915acc

Observation 6c0b0141-7624-44bd-9745-7f96f6792b26 · outbound

This paper cites M3Exam: A Multilingual, Multimodal, Multilevel Benchmark for Examining Large Language Models.

Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate M3Exam: A Multilingual, Multimodal, Multilevel Benchmark for Examining Large Language Models

Reference 18

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.432150Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T19:20:12.265548Z digest=sha256:c5d6a621b466d0ee59268bf1b71eae59f6e222d1b75189f1d83d1775df87e062

Pith citing papers

Observation 0ca0ded3-5e99-4bcd-a11d-58e9d76180c3 · inbound

RuBench: A Repository-Level Agentic Coding Benchmark with Natively Authored Russian Task Specifications cites this paper.

RuBench: A Repository-Level Agentic Coding Benchmark with Natively Authored Russian Task Specifications Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate

Reference 10

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-08T07:04:44.514208Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-08T06:55:40.830922Z digest=sha256:fb6262ccdf09da5933065db9d8b60ab9c760dccec1b76c3f5ce062eb362071c9

Observation 398a7918-8eb2-47f4-bcc1-6394e362bd83 · inbound

RuBench: A Repository-Level Agentic Coding Benchmark with Natively Authored Russian Task Specifications cites this paper.

RuBench: A Repository-Level Agentic Coding Benchmark with Natively Authored Russian Task Specifications Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T08:21:50.124329Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-02T08:21:50.124329Z digest=sha256:e5994fd40d9effa0236845b2343b33321ecae31683b5cd08f3da01118068dff8