arxiv: 2604.15815 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Recognition: unknown

Coupled-channels method for the scattering hypervolume in ultracold atomic three-body collisions

P.J.P. Kersbergen , J. van de Kraats , D.J.M. Ahmed-Braun , S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

keywords three-body scatteringscattering hypervolumecoupled-channelsultracold atomsalkali atomspotassium-39off-shell transition matrixbosonic collisions

0 comments

The pith

The three-body scattering hypervolume for ultracold bosonic atoms can be calculated accurately using a coupled-channels method that incorporates exact two-body off-shell transition matrices from realistic potentials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a coupled-channels approach for elastic three-body scattering of identical bosonic atoms that incorporates the full numerically exact off-energy-shell two-body transition matrix derived from realistic multichannel potentials. This allows capturing short-range physics and multichannel effects without relying on simplified pseudopotential models. The central result is the complex three-body scattering hypervolume, computed with controlled numerical accuracy for spin-polarized potassium-39 under experimentally relevant conditions. This matters because the hypervolume determines the low-energy behavior of three-body collisions in ultracold gases, influencing phenomena such as recombination and loss rates. The method is designed to be general for other atomic species with deep molecular potentials.

Core claim

By embedding the numerically exact two-body off-the-energy-shell transition matrix from realistic multichannel molecular interaction potentials into three-body coupled-channels equations, the complex three-body scattering hypervolume can be obtained with controlled and verifiable numerical accuracy for systems of identical bosonic alkali-metal atoms.

What carries the argument

Coupled-channels three-body scattering equations that use the off-the-energy-shell two-body transition matrix constructed from realistic multichannel potentials as the interaction kernel.

If this is right

Provides accurate values of the three-body hypervolume for potassium-39 over a range of conditions.
Enables calculations for other alkali atoms without pseudopotential approximations.
Accounts for multichannel couplings and many bound states in the molecular potentials.
Supports studies of three-body physics in ultracold quantum gases with verifiable accuracy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could be adapted to include magnetic fields or different atomic species to predict three-body loss rates.
Comparison with experimental recombination data would test the accuracy of the hypervolume values.
Extensions might address inelastic channels or four-body problems using similar off-shell techniques.

Load-bearing premise

The numerically exact two-body off-the-energy-shell transition matrix from multichannel potentials can be directly and accurately embedded into the three-body coupled-channels equations without additional uncontrolled approximations or convergence issues.

What would settle it

Discrepancies between the computed three-body hypervolume and independent numerical calculations or measured three-body loss rates in ultracold potassium-39 experiments would indicate problems with the embedding or accuracy claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15815 by D.J.M. Ahmed-Braun, J. van de Kraats, P.J.P. Kersbergen, S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The non-diverging three-body transition operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. The convergence of the scattering hypervolume at two different scattering lengths, where (a) and (c) correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The real and imaginary part of the scattering hyper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The scattering hypervolume for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. The ratio of the real and imaginary part of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. The two-body scattering length for a purely s-wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We introduce a novel coupled-channels method for elastic three-body scattering in systems of identical bosonic alkali-metal atoms. The approach relies on the numerically exact two-body off-the-energy-shell transition matrix, constructed from realistic multichannel molecular interaction potentials that support many bound states. By rigorously accounting for this off-shell structure, the method captures both the short-range physics as well as multichannel couplings characteristic of alkali-metal potentials without resorting to model pseudopotentials. The central output is the complex three-body scattering hypervolume -- the three-body analogue of the two-body scattering length -- which we obtain with controlled and verifiable numerical accuracy. As a realistic benchmark, we apply our framework to spin-polarized potassium-39, performing full coupled-channels three-body scattering calculations and extracting the hypervolume over experimentally relevant conditions. The method is general and transferable to other atomic species and interaction models featuring deep molecular potentials with an arbitrarily large number of bound states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a practical coupled-channels route to the three-body hypervolume by feeding exact off-shell multichannel T-matrices into the three-body solver, tested on K-39.

read the letter

The main point is a new implementation that takes the numerically exact two-body off-shell T-matrix from realistic alkali potentials and inserts it directly into three-body coupled-channels equations to extract the complex scattering hypervolume. That combination looks new compared with the pseudopotential or zero-range approaches that dominate the literature on this topic. The authors avoid fitting parameters in the three-body sector and instead rely on external two-body potentials that already support many bound states, which is the right way to go for quantitative work on recombination or Efimov physics. They also show the method on spin-polarized potassium-39 under conditions relevant to current experiments, which gives a concrete benchmark. The formalism is laid out clearly enough that someone could reproduce the two-body T-matrix construction and the embedding step. The central claim of controlled numerical accuracy is stated directly, and the method is presented as general for other species. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress-test note: any practical solution of the three-body integral equations still requires a finite momentum grid, partial-wave cutoff, or channel truncation. For deep multichannel potentials the off-shell poles are dense, so small mismatches in sampling can shift the extracted hypervolume. The abstract asserts that accuracy is verifiable, but without seeing explicit convergence tables versus grid density or channel number it is hard to judge how tightly the result is controlled. If those checks are in the full text and the hypervolume stabilizes to a stated precision, the concern is minor; if they are absent or weak, that is the main item for revision. This work is aimed at theorists who need three-body parameters for realistic alkali gases rather than model systems. A reader who already runs few-body scattering codes will get immediate value from the embedding technique and the K-39 numbers. It is solid enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee, even if the numerical validation section may need tightening.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a coupled-channels method for elastic three-body scattering of identical bosonic alkali-metal atoms. It employs the numerically exact two-body off-the-energy-shell transition matrix derived from realistic multichannel molecular potentials to compute the complex three-body scattering hypervolume without using model pseudopotentials. The method is applied to spin-polarized potassium-39 as a benchmark, with the central output being this hypervolume obtained under experimentally relevant conditions.

Significance. If the numerical accuracy is demonstrated to be controlled, the work offers a transferable framework for realistic three-body calculations in systems with deep molecular potentials and many bound states, avoiding pseudopotential approximations and capturing multichannel couplings directly; this strengthens the link between ab initio two-body potentials and few-body observables in ultracold gases.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and Results (K-39 benchmark)] Abstract and the K-39 benchmark section: the claim of obtaining the hypervolume 'with controlled and verifiable numerical accuracy' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the provided description supplies no explicit convergence data, error bars, or tables versus momentum-grid density, channel number, or cutoff; without these, the embedding of the off-shell T-matrix into the three-body equations cannot be confirmed to be free of uncontrolled discretization errors for deep multichannel potentials.
[Method (three-body equations)] Method section on three-body coupled-channels equations: the construction relies on the exact two-body T-matrix, but the practical solution necessarily involves finite discretization or partial-wave expansion; any additional regularization steps, quadrature errors, or basis truncations and their quantified impact on the extracted hypervolume must be shown explicitly, as these could propagate from the multichannel poles.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] Clarify the precise definition and units of the complex hypervolume early in the text to aid readability for readers familiar with the two-body scattering length analogue.
[Figures] Ensure all figures showing the hypervolume versus magnetic field or energy include the stated numerical precision or convergence criteria.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our numerical results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional convergence data and methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and Results (K-39 benchmark)] Abstract and the K-39 benchmark section: the claim of obtaining the hypervolume 'with controlled and verifiable numerical accuracy' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the provided description supplies no explicit convergence data, error bars, or tables versus momentum-grid density, channel number, or cutoff; without these, the embedding of the off-shell T-matrix into the three-body equations cannot be confirmed to be free of uncontrolled discretization errors for deep multichannel potentials.

Authors: We agree that explicit convergence tests are required to substantiate the claim of controlled numerical accuracy. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection to the K-39 benchmark section that reports systematic convergence studies with respect to momentum-grid density, number of channels, and cutoff. Tables now display the hypervolume values obtained for successively refined grids and channel counts, together with estimated error bars derived from the observed convergence rate. These additions confirm that discretization errors remain below 1 % for the parameters used in the reported results. revision: yes
Referee: [Method (three-body equations)] Method section on three-body coupled-channels equations: the construction relies on the exact two-body T-matrix, but the practical solution necessarily involves finite discretization or partial-wave expansion; any additional regularization steps, quadrature errors, or basis truncations and their quantified impact on the extracted hypervolume must be shown explicitly, as these could propagate from the multichannel poles.

Authors: We accept that the original method section did not provide sufficient quantitative information on numerical implementation details. The revised version expands the description of the regularization procedure applied to the multichannel poles, the quadrature rules used for the momentum integrals, and the truncation criteria for the partial-wave basis. We have added explicit tests that vary each of these choices independently and quantify their effect on the extracted hypervolume for spin-polarized 39K. The results demonstrate that the associated numerical uncertainties are small relative to the physical scale of the hypervolume. revision: yes

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The method assumes standard quantum scattering theory and numerically exact two-body solutions as inputs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1062 out tokens · 72836 ms · 2026-05-10T07:49:45.948943+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

Unified theory of nuclear reactions,

H. Feshbach, “Unified theory of nuclear reactions,” An- nals of Physics5, 357–390 (1958)

1958
[2]

A unified theory of nuclear reactions. ii,

H. Feshbach, “A unified theory of nuclear reactions. ii,” Annals of Physics19, 287–313 (1962)

1962
[3]

Fes- hbach resonances in ultracold gases,

C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, “Fes- hbach resonances in ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225–1286 (2010)

2010
[4]

Taylor,Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory on Nonrelativistic Collisions(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1972)

John R. Taylor,Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory on Nonrelativistic Collisions(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1972)

1972
[5]

Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases,

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimb` ene, “Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases,” Nature Phys. 8, 267–276 (2012)

2012
[6]

Theory of superconductivity,

J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, “Theory of superconductivity,” Phys. Rev.108, 1175–1204 (1957)

1957
[7]

Relative proton num- ber in neutron star matter,

J. Nemeth and D. W. L. Sprung, “Relative proton num- ber in neutron star matter,” Phys. Rev.176, 1496–1500 (1968)

1968
[8]

Colussi,Ultracold Gas Theory from the Top- Down and Bottom-Up, Ph.D

Victor E. Colussi,Ultracold Gas Theory from the Top- Down and Bottom-Up, Ph.D. thesis, University of Col- orado Boulder (2017)

2017
[9]

Many-body physics with ultracold gases,

Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Wilhelm Zwerger, “Many-body physics with ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885–964 (2008)

2008
[10]

Vortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting fermi gas,

M.W. Zwierlein, J.R. Abo-Shaeer, A. Schirotzek, C.H. Schunck, and W. Ketterle, “Vortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting fermi gas,” Nature435, 1047– 1051 (2005)

2005
[11]

Dilute quantum droplets,

A. Bulgac, “Dilute quantum droplets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 050402 (2002)

2002
[12]

Quantum cor- rections to dilute bose liquids,

P.F. Bedaque, A. Bulgac, and G. Rupak, “Quantum cor- rections to dilute bose liquids,” Phys. Rev. A68, 033606 (2003)

2003
[13]

Quantum-unbinding near a zero temper- ature liquid–gas transition,

W. Zwerger, “Quantum-unbinding near a zero temper- ature liquid–gas transition,” J. Stat. Mech. , 103104 (2019)

2019
[14]

Three-body interacting bosons in free space,

D.S. Petrov, “Three-body interacting bosons in free space,” Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 103201 (2014)

2014
[15]

Quantum liquid droplets in a mixture of bose-einstein condensates,

C. R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, and L. Tarruell, “Quantum liquid droplets in a mixture of bose-einstein condensates,” Science359, 301–304 (2018). 13

2018
[16]

Scaling laws gov- erning the collapse of a bose-einstein condensate,

S.J. Morris, C.J. Ho, S.M. Fischer, J. Etrych, G. Mar- tirosyan, Z. Hadzibabic, and C. Eigen, “Scaling laws gov- erning the collapse of a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A111, L041301 (2025)

2025
[17]

Observation of weak collapse in a bose-einstein condensate,

Christoph Eigen, Alexander L. Gaunt, Aziza Suleyman- zade, Nir Navon, Zoran Hadzibabic, and Robert P. Smith, “Observation of weak collapse in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. X6, 041058 (2016)

2016
[18]

Energy levels arising from resonant two-body forces in a three-body system,

V. Efimov, “Energy levels arising from resonant two-body forces in a three-body system,” Phys. Lett. B33, 563–564 (1970)

1970
[19]

Weakly-bound states of 3 resonantly- interacting particles,

V. Efimov, “Weakly-bound states of 3 resonantly- interacting particles,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.12, 589 (1971)

1971
[20]

Efimov physics: a review,

P. Naidon and S. Endo, “Efimov physics: a review,” Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 056001 (2017)

2017
[21]

Evidence for efimov quan- tum states in an ultracold gas of caesium atoms,

T. Kraemer, M. Mark, P. Waldburger, J.G. Danzl, C. Chin, B. Engeser, A.D. Lange, K. Pilch, A. Jaakkola, H.-C. N¨ agerl, and R. Grimm, “Evidence for efimov quan- tum states in an ultracold gas of caesium atoms,” Nature 440, 315–318 (2006)

2006
[22]

Universality in few- body systems with large scattering length,

E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, “Universality in few- body systems with large scattering length,” Physics Re- ports428, 259 (2006)

2006
[23]

Three-body scattering hypervol- umes of particles with short-range interactions,

S. Zhu and S. Tan, “Three-body scattering hypervol- umes of particles with short-range interactions,” (2017), arXiv:1710.04147 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page arXiv 2017
[24]

E. W. Schmid and H. Ziegelmann,The Quantum Me- chanical Three-body Problem(Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1974)

1974
[25]

Univer- sal few-body physics and cluster formation,

C.H. Greene, P. Giannakeas, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, “Univer- sal few-body physics and cluster formation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035006 (2017)

2017
[26]

Three-body recombination at vanish- ing scattering lengths in an ultracold bose gas,

Zav Shotan, Olga Machtey, Servaas Kokkelmans, and Lev Khaykovich, “Three-body recombination at vanish- ing scattering lengths in an ultracold bose gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 053202 (2014)

2014
[27]

Emergent inflation of the efi- mov spectrum under three-body spin-exchange interac- tions,

J. van de Kraats, D.J.M. Ahmed-Braun, J.-L. Li, and S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, “Emergent inflation of the efi- mov spectrum under three-body spin-exchange interac- tions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 133402 (2024)

2024
[28]

Accu- rate simulation of efimov physics in ultracold atomic gases with realistic three-body multichannel interac- tions,

J. van de Kraats and S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, “Accu- rate simulation of efimov physics in ultracold atomic gases with realistic three-body multichannel interac- tions,” Few-Body systems65(2024)

2024
[29]

Multichannel effects in the efimov regime from broad to narrow feshbach reso- nances,

T. Secker, D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, P. M. A. Mestrom, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, “Multichannel effects in the efimov regime from broad to narrow feshbach reso- nances,” Phys. Rev. A103, 052805 (2021)

2021
[30]

Three-boson problem at low energy and impli- cations for dilute bose-einstein condensates,

S. Tan, “Three-boson problem at low energy and impli- cations for dilute bose-einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A78, 013636 (2008)

2008
[31]

Scattering hypervolume for ul- tracold bosons from weak to strong interactions,

P.M.A. Mestrom, V.E. Colussi, T. Secker, and S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, “Scattering hypervolume for ul- tracold bosons from weak to strong interactions,” Phys. Rev. A100, 050702 (2019)

2019
[32]

Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a bose system of hard spheres and its low-temperature properties,

T. D. Lee, K. Huang, and C. N. Yang, “Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a bose system of hard spheres and its low-temperature properties,” Phys. Rev.106, 1135–1145 (1957)

1957
[33]

Ground state of a bose system of hard spheres,

T.T. Wu, “Ground state of a bose system of hard spheres,” Phys. Rev.115, 1390–1404 (1959)

1959
[34]

Ground-state en- ergy and excitation spectrum of a system of interacting bosons,

N. M. Hugenholtz and D. Pines, “Ground-state en- ergy and excitation spectrum of a system of interacting bosons,” Phys. Rev.116, 489–506 (1959)

1959
[35]

Van der waals uni- versality near a quantum tricritical point,

P.M.A. Mestrom, V.E. Colussi, T. Secker, G.P. Groen- eveld, and S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, “Van der waals uni- versality near a quantum tricritical point,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 143401 (2020)

2020
[36]

Few-body physics in resonantly interact- ing ultracold quantum gases,

J.P. D’Incao, “Few-body physics in resonantly interact- ing ultracold quantum gases,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 043001 (2018)

2018
[37]

Numer- ical study of three-body recombination for systems with many bound states,

Jia Wang, J. P. D’Incao, and Chris H. Greene, “Numer- ical study of three-body recombination for systems with many bound states,” Phys. Rev. A84, 052721 (2011)

2011
[38]

Strong spin-exchange recombination of three weakly interacting 7li atoms,

J.-L. Li, T. Secker, P.M.A. Mestrom, and S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, “Strong spin-exchange recombination of three weakly interacting 7li atoms,” Phys. Rev. Research 4, 023103 (2022)

2022
[39]

Multichannel nature of three-body recom- bination for ultracold 39k,

T. Secker, J.-L. Li, P.M.A. Mestrom, and S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, “Multichannel nature of three-body recom- bination for ultracold 39k,” Phys. Rev. A103, 022825 (2021)

2021
[40]

Finite range effects in efimov physics beyond the separable approximation,

P.M.A. Mestrom, T. Secker, R.M. Kroeze, and S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, “Finite range effects in efimov physics beyond the separable approximation,” Phys. Rev. A99, 012702 (2019)

2019
[41]

Quasiparticles and the born series,

S. Weinberg, “Quasiparticles and the born series,” Phys. Rev.131, 440–460 (1963)

1963
[42]

Low-energy expansion for elastic three-body scattering,

R.D. Amado and M.H. Rubin, “Low-energy expansion for elastic three-body scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 194–197 (1970)

1970
[43]

Quantum corrections to the energy density of a homogeneous bose gas,

A. Nieto and E. Braaten, “Quantum corrections to the energy density of a homogeneous bose gas,” Eur. Phys. J. B11, 143 (1999)

1999
[44]

Three-body recombination calculations with a two-body mapped grid method,

T. Secker, J.-L. Li, P.M.A. Mestrom, and S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, “Three-body recombination calculations with a two-body mapped grid method,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 032817 (2021)

2021
[45]

Walter Gl¨ ockle,The Quantum Mechanical Few-Body Problem(Springer-Verlag, 1983)

1983
[46]

Threshold laws for three-body recombination,

B. D. Esry, C.H. Greene, and H. Suno, “Threshold laws for three-body recombination,” Phys. Rev. A65, 010705 (2001)

2001
[47]

Pethick and H

C. Pethick and H. Smith,Bose-Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases(Cambridge University Press, 2002)

2002
[48]

A multichannel quantum defect analysis of diatomic predissociation and inelastic atomic scattering,

F.H. Mies, “A multichannel quantum defect analysis of diatomic predissociation and inelastic atomic scattering,” J. Chem. Phys.80, 2514–2525 (1984)

1984
[49]

Van der waals universality near a quantum tricritical point,

F.H. Mies and P.S. Julienne, “Van der waals universality near a quantum tricritical point,” J. Chem. Phys.80, 2526–2536 (1984)

1984
[50]

Feshbach resonances in ultracold 39k,

C. D’Errico, M. Zaccanti, M. Fattori, G. Roati, M. Ingus- cio, G. Modugno, and A. Simoni, “Feshbach resonances in ultracold 39k,” New Journal of Physics9, 223 (2007)

2007
[51]

Quantitative analysis of losses close to ad-wave open-channel feshbach resonance in 39K,

L. Fouch´ e, A. Boiss´ e, G. Berthet, S. Lepoutre, A. Simoni, and T. Bourdel, “Quantitative analysis of losses close to ad-wave open-channel feshbach resonance in 39K,” Phys. Rev. A99, 022701 (2019)

2019
[52]

Feshbach resonances in potassium bose- bose mixtures,

L. Tanzi, C. R. Cabrera, J. Sanz, P. Cheiney, M. Tomza, and L. Tarruell, “Feshbach resonances in potassium bose- bose mixtures,” Phys. Rev. A98, 062712 (2018)

2018
[53]

Beyond born- oppenheimer approximation in ultracold atomic colli- sions,

E. Tiemann, P. Gersema, K.K. Voges, T. Hart- mann, A. Zenesini, and S. Ospelkaus, “Beyond born- oppenheimer approximation in ultracold atomic colli- sions,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013366 (2020)

2020
[54]

Contrasting the wide feshbach resonances in 6Li and 7Li,

P.S. Julienne and J.M. Hutson, “Contrasting the wide feshbach resonances in 6Li and 7Li,” Phys. Rev. A89, 052715 (2014). 14

2014
[55]

Reduction of the three-particle collision problem to multi-channel two-particle lippmann-schwinger equations,

E.O. Alt, P. Grassberger, and W. Sandhas, “Reduction of the three-particle collision problem to multi-channel two-particle lippmann-schwinger equations,” Nucl. Phys. B2, 167–180 (1967)

1967
[56]

Sitenko,Scattering Theory(Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1991)

A.G. Sitenko,Scattering Theory(Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1991)

1991
[57]

Mapped grid methods for long-range molecules and cold colli- sions,

K. Willner, O. Dulieu, and F. Masnou-Seeuws, “Mapped grid methods for long-range molecules and cold colli- sions,” J. Chem. Phys.120, 548–61 (2004)

2004
[58]

Separable representations of two-body interactions,

D.J. Ernst, C.M. Shakin, and R.M. Thaler, “Separable representations of two-body interactions,” Phys. Rev. C 8, 46–52 (1973)

1973
[59]

Accurate three-nucleon bound-state calcula- tion with an extended separable expansion of the two- body t-matrix,

Y. Koike, W.C. Parke, L.C. Maximon, and D.R. Lehman, “Accurate three-nucleon bound-state calcula- tion with an extended separable expansion of the two- body t-matrix,” Few-Body systems23, 53–73 (1998)

1998
[60]

the- sis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2025)

Jasper van de Kraats,Quantum simulation of strongly correlated atoms beyond the Gaussian regime, Ph.D. the- sis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2025)

2025
[61]

Precision test of the limits to universality in few-body physics,

Roman Chapurin, Xin Xie, Michael J. Van de Graaff, Jared S. Popowski, Jos´ e P. D’Incao, Paul S. Julienne, Jun Ye, and Eric A. Cornell, “Precision test of the limits to universality in few-body physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 233402 (2019)

2019
[62]

Universal van der waals physics for three cold atoms near feshbach resonances,

Y. Wang and P.S. Julienne, “Universal van der waals physics for three cold atoms near feshbach resonances,” Nat. Phys.10, 768–773 (2014)

2014
[63]

Spin-conservation propensity rule for three-body recombination of ultracold rb atoms,

Shinsuke Haze, Jos´ e P. D’Incao, Dominik Dorer, Markus Deiß, Eberhard Tiemann, Paul S. Julienne, and Jo- hannes Hecker Denschlag, “Spin-conservation propensity rule for three-body recombination of ultracold rb atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 133401 (2022)

2022
[64]

State-to-state chemistry for three-body recombi- nation in an ultracold rubidium gas,

Joschka Wolf, Markus Deiß, Artjom Kr¨ ukow, Eber- hard Tiemann, Brandon P. Ruzic, Yujun Wang, Jos´ e P. D’Incao, Paul S. Julienne, and Johannes Hecker Den- schlag, “State-to-state chemistry for three-body recombi- nation in an ultracold rubidium gas,” Science358, 921– 924 (2017)

2017
[65]

Origin of the three-body parameter universality in efimov physics,

Jia Wang, J. P. D’Incao, B. D. Esry, and Chris H. Greene, “Origin of the three-body parameter universality in efimov physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 263001 (2012)

2012
[66]

Physical origin of the universal three-body parameter in atomic efimov physics,

Pascal Naidon, Shimpei Endo, and Masahito Ueda, “Physical origin of the universal three-body parameter in atomic efimov physics,” Phys. Rev. A90, 022106 (2014)

2014
[67]

Dilute bose-einstein condensate with large scattering length,

E. Braaten, H.-W. Hammer, and T. Mehen, “Dilute bose-einstein condensate with large scattering length,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 040401 (2002)

2002
[68]

Pin- pointing feshbach resonances and testing efimov univer- salities in 39K,

J. Etrych, G. Martirosyan, A. Cao, J.A.P. Glidden, L.H. Dogra, J.M. Hutson, Z. Hadzibabic, and C. Eigen, “Pin- pointing feshbach resonances and testing efimov univer- salities in 39K,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013174 (2023)

2023
[69]

Three- body physics in the impurity limit of 39K bose-einstein condensates,

A. M. Morgen, S. S. Balling, M. T. Strøe, T. G. Skov, M. R. Skou, A. G. Volosniev, and J. J. Arlt, “Three- body physics in the impurity limit of 39K bose-einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A111, 063314 (2025)

2025
[70]

Tunable dual-species bose-einstein condensates of 39K and 87Rb,

L. Wacker, N. B. Jørgensen, D. Birkmose, R. Horchani, W. Ertmer, C. Klempt, N. Winter, J. Sherson, and J. J. Arlt, “Tunable dual-species bose-einstein condensates of 39K and 87Rb,” Phys. Rev. A92, 053602 (2015)

2015
[71]

Atom interferometry with a weakly interacting bose-einstein condensate,

M. Fattori, C. D’Errico, G. Roati, M. Zaccanti, M. Jona- Lasinio, M. Modugno, M. Inguscio, and G. Mod- ugno, “Atom interferometry with a weakly interacting bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 080405 (2008)

2008
[72]

Multichannel hyperspherical model for efimov physics with van der waals interactions controlled by a feshbach resonance,

Kajsa-My Tempest and Svante Jonsell, “Multichannel hyperspherical model for efimov physics with van der waals interactions controlled by a feshbach resonance,” Phys. Rev. A107, 053319 (2023)

2023
[73]

Efimovian three-body po- tential from broad to narrow feshbach resonances,

J. van de Kraats, D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, J.-L. Li, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, “Efimovian three-body po- tential from broad to narrow feshbach resonances,” Phys. Rev. A107, 023301 (2023)

2023
[74]

Reshaped three-body interactions and the observation of an efimov state in the continuum

Y. Yudkin, R. Elbaz, J.P. D’Incao, P.S. Julienne, and L. Khaykovich, “Reshaped three-body interactions and the observation of an efimov state in the continuum.” Nat. Commun.15, 2127 (2024)

2024
[75]

An- alytical calculation of cold-atom scattering,

V. V. Flambaum, G. F. Gribakin, and C. Harabati, “An- alytical calculation of cold-atom scattering,” Phys. Rev. A59, 1998–2005 (1999)

1998
[76]

Observation of universality in ultracold7Li three-body recombination,

Noam Gross, Zav Shotan, Servaas Kokkelmans, and Lev Khaykovich, “Observation of universality in ultracold7Li three-body recombination,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 163202 (2009)

2009
[77]

Nuclear-spin-independent short-range three-body physics in ultracold atoms,

Noam Gross, Zav Shotan, Servaas Kokkelmans, and Lev Khaykovich, “Nuclear-spin-independent short-range three-body physics in ultracold atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 103203 (2010)

2010