pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15834 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Recognition: unknown

Comprehensive analyses of rare Λ_b rightarrow Λ ell^+ ell^-, Sigma_b rightarrow Sigma ell^+ ell^- and Xi_b rightarrow Xi ell^+ ell^- decays in 2HDM

Z. Tavuko\u{g}lu , A. T. Olgun , K. Azizi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords rightarrowdecayslambdamodelsigmararebranchingtwo-higgs-doublet
0
0 comments X

The pith

The work computes differential and total branching ratios plus forward-backward asymmetries for Λ_b → Λ ℓ⁺ℓ⁻, Σ_b → Σ ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ and Ξ_b → Ξ ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ in 2HDM Type III and contrasts them with SM predictions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Rare decays of bottom baryons into a lighter baryon plus a lepton pair are suppressed in the Standard Model and therefore sensitive to possible new particles. The authors focus on three such channels involving Λ_b, Σ_b and Ξ_b baryons decaying to muons or taus. They embed the decays in a general Two-Higgs-Doublet Model of Type III, which adds extra Higgs bosons that can modify the effective operators governing the process. Form factors that describe the baryon-to-baryon transition are taken from light-cone QCD sum rules in full theory. With these ingredients they evaluate the differential branching ratio, the integrated branching ratio and the lepton forward-backward asymmetry as functions of the dilepton invariant mass. Results are compared with Standard-Model expectations, lattice-QCD calculations and any available experimental limits. The paper concludes that the 2HDM Type-III contributions can be sizable in some channels and that the upcoming LHCb and Belle II upgrades should be able to probe the predicted rates.

Core claim

We aim to assess the impact of the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model with Type III on various observables, such as the differential branching ratio, total branching ratio, and lepton forward-backward asymmetries using the decay amplitude and the transition matrix elements in terms of form factors calculated via light cone QCD in full theory.

Load-bearing premise

The transition matrix elements are expressed in terms of form factors calculated via light-cone QCD sum rules in full theory; any systematic uncertainty or model dependence in those form factors directly propagates into the predicted observables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15834 by A. T. Olgun, K. Azizi, Z. Tavuko\u{g}lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27. The representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_27.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate rare special dileptonic decays of $ \Lambda_b$, $\Sigma_b$ and $\Xi_b $ baryons in the Standard Model and context of the general Two-Higgs-Doublet Model with Type III. Specifically, we consider the decays $ \Lambda_b \rightarrow \Lambda \ell^+ \ell^-$, $\Sigma_b \rightarrow \Sigma \ell^+ \ell^-$ and $\Xi_b \rightarrow \Xi \ell^+ \ell^-$, where $\ell$ represents $\mu$ or $\tau$ lepton. By studying these rare decays, we aim to assess the impact of the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model with Type III on various observables, such as the differential branching ratio, total branching ratio, and lepton forward-backward asymmetries using the decay amplitude and the transition matrix elements in terms of form factors calculated via light cone QCD in full theory. We compare our results to those of the Standard Model, as well as existing lattice QCD predictions and experimental data, to assess the agreement and viability of the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model with Type III. Furthermore, we highlight the potential for experimental investigations of these decay channels in the near future. The soon-to-be updated LHCb and/or Belle II detectors, renowned for their capabilities in studying rare decays, present excellent opportunities for probing the predicted branching ratios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on light-cone QCD form factors taken from earlier work and on the choice of 2HDM Type-III parameters that are not derived from first principles within the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • 2HDM Type-III Yukawa couplings or tan β
    These parameters are adjusted to produce observable effects and are not fixed by the present calculation.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Light-cone QCD sum rules provide reliable form factors for the baryon transitions
    Invoked when the decay amplitude is written in terms of these form factors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1421 out tokens · 63583 ms · 2026-05-10T08:39:45.342789+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    1 𝑦−1 − 1 (𝑦−1) 2 ln𝑦 # −𝑦

    A comprehensive discussion of these parameters and their explicit form can be found in Ref. [35]. Analogous to the mechanism of fermion mass generation in the SM, fermions in the 2HDM acquire mass through Yukawa interactions𝑦 𝑖 𝑗 with the scalar doublets. For the first Higgs doubletΦ 1, the Yukawa couplings are constrained to be diagonal both in flavor sp...

  2. [2]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716, 1-29 (2012) [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    S. Chatrchyanet al.[CMS], “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716, 30-61 (2012) [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV,

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.[CMS], “Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV,” Phys. Lett. B860, 139067 (2025) [arXiv:2405.18149 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Search for diphoton resonances in the 66 to 110 GeV mass range using pp collisions at √𝑠= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], “Search for diphoton resonances in the 66 to 110 GeV mass range using pp collisions at √𝑠= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP01, 053 (2025) [arXiv:2407.07546 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    CMS detector: Run 3 status and plans for Phase-2,

    S. Morovi ´c [CMS], “CMS detector: Run 3 status and plans for Phase-2,” [arXiv:2309.02256 [hep-ex]]. 25 FIG. 17. The representation of the𝐴 𝐹 𝐵 without long-distance contributions as a function of𝑞 2 for theΛ 𝑏 →Λ𝜇 + 𝜇− transition within the SM and 2HDM frameworks, plotted against different charged Higgs masses for𝜆𝑡𝑡 =0.05,𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0.15, and𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0.30, resp...

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Gunion, H.E

    J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane and S. Dawson, “Errata for the Higgs hunter’s guide,” [arXiv:hep-ph/9302272 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J. P. Silva, “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,” Phys. Rept.516, 1-102 (2012) [arXiv:1106.0034 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Mass Matrix Ansatz and Flavor Nonconservation in Models with Multiple Higgs Doublets,

    T. P. Cheng and M. Sher, “Mass Matrix Ansatz and Flavor Nonconservation in Models with Multiple Higgs Doublets,” Phys. Rev. D35, 3484 (1987)

    1987

  10. [11]

    Observation of the Baryonic Flavor-Changing Neutral Current DecayΛ 𝑏 →Λ𝜇 + 𝜇−,

    T. Aaltonenet al.[CDF], “Observation of the Baryonic Flavor-Changing Neutral Current DecayΛ 𝑏 →Λ𝜇 + 𝜇−,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 201802 (2011) [arXiv:1107.3753 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2011

  11. [12]

    Differential branching fraction and angular analysis ofΛ 0 𝑏 →Λ𝜇 + 𝜇− decays,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Differential branching fraction and angular analysis ofΛ 0 𝑏 →Λ𝜇 + 𝜇− decays,” JHEP06, 115 (2015) [erratum: JHEP09, 145 (2018)] [arXiv:1503.07138 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  12. [13]

    Semileptonic Transition ofΣ 𝑏 →Σ𝜇 + 𝜇− in Family Non-universal𝑍 ′ Model,

    N. Katirci and K. Azizi, “Semileptonic Transition ofΣ 𝑏 →Σ𝜇 + 𝜇− in Family Non-universal𝑍 ′ Model,” J. Phys. G40, 085005 (2013) [arXiv:1207.4053 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2013

  13. [14]

    Light cone QCD sum rules study of the semileptonic heavyΞ𝑄 andΞ ′ 𝑄 transitions toΞandΣbaryons,

    K. Azizi, Y. Sarac and H. Sundu, “Light cone QCD sum rules study of the semileptonic heavyΞ𝑄 andΞ ′ 𝑄 transitions toΞandΣbaryons,” Eur. Phys. J. A48, 2 (2012) [arXiv:1107.5925 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  14. [15]

    Analysis of the $\Lambda_{b}\rar \Lambda \ell^+\ell^- $ decay in QCD

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci, “Analysis of theΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− decay in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D81, 056006 (2010) [arXiv:1001.0227 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  15. [16]

    Analysis of the semileptonicΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− transition in the topcolor-assisted technicolor model,

    K. Azizi, S. Kartal, A. T. Olgun and Z. Tavukoglu, “Analysis of the semileptonicΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− transition in the topcolor-assisted technicolor model,” Phys. Rev. D88, no.7, 075007 (2013) [arXiv:1307.3101 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2013

  16. [17]

    Rare baryon decaysΛ𝑏 →Λ𝑙 +𝑙 − (𝑙=𝑒, 𝜇, 𝜏)andΛ 𝑏 →Λ𝛾 : differential and total rates, lepton- and hadron-side forward-backward asymmetries,

    T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner, V. E. Lyubovitskij and P. Santorelli, “Rare baryon decaysΛ𝑏 →Λ𝑙 +𝑙 − (𝑙=𝑒, 𝜇, 𝜏)andΛ 𝑏 →Λ𝛾 : differential and total rates, lepton- and hadron-side forward-backward asymmetries,” Phys. Rev. D87, 074031 (2013) [arXiv:1301.3737 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2013

  17. [18]

    Angular Analysis of the DecayΛ 𝑏 →Λ(→𝑁 𝜋)ℓ +ℓ−,

    P. B ¨oer, T. Feldmann and D. van Dyk, “Angular Analysis of the DecayΛ 𝑏 →Λ(→𝑁 𝜋)ℓ +ℓ−,” JHEP01, 155 (2015) [arXiv:1410.2115 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  18. [19]

    Λ b →Λℓ +ℓ− form factors, differential branching fraction, and angular observables from lattice QCD with relativisticbquarks,

    W. Detmold and S. Meinel, “Λ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− form factors, differential branching fraction, and angular observables from lattice QCD with 26 FIG. 18. The representation of the𝐴 𝐹 𝐵 as a function of𝑞 2 for theΛ 𝑏 →Λ𝜏 +𝜏− transition in SM and 2HDM models with long-distance contributions plotted against different Higgs masses for𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0.05,𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0.15 and𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0.30...

    work page arXiv 2016

  19. [20]

    Semileptonic decays ofΛ 𝑏 baryons in the relativistic quark model,

    R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, “Semileptonic decays ofΛ 𝑏 baryons in the relativistic quark model,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.7, 073008 (2016) [arXiv:1609.00199 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2016

  20. [21]

    On the angular distribution ofΛ 𝑏 →Λ(→𝑁 𝜋)𝜏 +𝜏− decay,

    D. Das, “On the angular distribution ofΛ 𝑏 →Λ(→𝑁 𝜋)𝜏 +𝜏− decay,” JHEP07, 063 (2018) [arXiv:1804.08527 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [22]

    Effects of scalar leptoquark on semileptonicΛ 𝑏 decays,

    S. Sahoo and R. Mohanta, “Effects of scalar leptoquark on semileptonicΛ 𝑏 decays,” New J. Phys.18, no.9, 093051 (2016) [arXiv:1607.04449 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2016

  22. [23]

    Asymmetries and observables forΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ−,

    G. Kumar and N. Mahajan, “Asymmetries and observables forΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ−,” [arXiv:1511.00935 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  23. [24]

    StudyingB 1 ( 1 2 + ) → B 2 ( 1 2 + )ℓ +ℓ− semileptonic weak baryon decays with the SU(3) flavor symmetry,

    R. M. Wang, Y. G. Xu, C. Hua and X. D. Cheng, “StudyingB 1 ( 1 2 + ) → B 2 ( 1 2 + )ℓ +ℓ− semileptonic weak baryon decays with the SU(3) flavor symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.1, 013007 (2021) [arXiv:2101.02421 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [25]

    Predicted𝛯 𝑏 (6087)0 and further predictions,

    W. H. Tan, H. M. Yang and H. X. Chen, “Predicted𝛯 𝑏 (6087)0 and further predictions,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.4, 382 (2024) [arXiv:2311.18380 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [26]

    Impact of scalar leptoquarks on heavy baryonic decays,

    K. Azizi, A. T. Olgun and Z. Tavukoglu, “Impact of scalar leptoquarks on heavy baryonic decays,” Adv. High Energy Phys.2017, 7435876 (2017) [arXiv:1609.09678 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  26. [27]

    Comparative analysis of theΛ𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− decay in the SM, SUSY and RS model with custodial protection,

    K. Azizi, A. T. Olgun and Z. Tavuko˘glu, “Comparative analysis of theΛ𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− decay in the SM, SUSY and RS model with custodial protection,” Phys. Rev. D92, no.11, 115025 (2015) [arXiv:1508.03980 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  27. [28]

    Comparative analysis of the semileptonicΛ𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− transition in SM and different SUSY scenarios using form factors from full QCD,

    K. Azizi, S. Kartal, A. T. Olgun and Z. Tavukoglu, “Comparative analysis of the semileptonicΛ𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− transition in SM and different SUSY scenarios using form factors from full QCD,” JHEP10, 118 (2012) [arXiv:1208.2203 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  28. [29]

    Constraint on compactification scale via recently observed baryonic Λ𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− channel and analysis of theΣ 𝑏 →Σℓ +ℓ− transition in SM and UED scenario,

    K. Azizi, S. Kartal, N. Katirci, A. T. Olgun and Z. Tavukoglu, “Constraint on compactification scale via recently observed baryonic Λ𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− channel and analysis of theΣ 𝑏 →Σℓ +ℓ− transition in SM and UED scenario,” JHEP05, 024 (2012) [arXiv:1203.4356 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  29. [30]

    Analysis ofΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− Transition in SM4 using Form Factors from Full QCD,

    K. Azizi and N. Katirci, “Analysis ofΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− Transition in SM4 using Form Factors from Full QCD,” Eur. Phys. J. A48, 73 (2012) [arXiv:1112.5242 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  30. [31]

    Status of the semileptonicBdecays and muon g-2 in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos,

    S. Iguro and Y. Omura, “Status of the semileptonic𝐵decays and muon g-2 in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos,” JHEP05, 173 (2018) [arXiv:1802.01732 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [32]

    Crivellin, D

    A. Crivellin, D. M¨ uller and C. Wiegand, “𝑏→𝑠ℓ+ℓ− transitions in two-Higgs-doublet models,” JHEP06, 119 (2019) [arXiv:1903.10440 [hep-ph]]. 27 FIG. 19. The representation of the𝐴 𝐹 𝐵 as a function of𝑞 2 for theΛ 𝑏 →Λ𝜏 +𝜏− transition in SM and 2HDM models without long-distance contributions plotted against different Higgs masses for𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0.05,𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0.15 a...

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [33]

    Conclusive probe of the charged Higgs solution of P5’ and RD(*) discrepancies,

    S. Iguro, “Conclusive probe of the charged Higgs solution of P5’ and RD(*) discrepancies,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.9, 095004 (2023) [arXiv:2302.08935 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [34]

    Accumulating hints for flavor-violating Higgs bosons at the electroweak scale,

    A. Crivellin and S. Iguro, “Accumulating hints for flavor-violating Higgs bosons at the electroweak scale,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.1, 015014 (2024) [arXiv:2311.03430 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [35]

    Searching for di-Higgs signatures of light charged scalars,

    G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin and S. Iguro, “Searching for di-Higgs signatures of light charged scalars,” JHEP01, 016 (2026) [arXiv:2507.00121 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [36]

    Are There Hidden Scalars in LHC Higgs Results?,

    A. Arhrib, P. M. Ferreira and R. Santos, “Are There Hidden Scalars in LHC Higgs Results?,” JHEP03, 053 (2014) [arXiv:1311.1520 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2014

  36. [37]

    Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model

    S. Davidson and H. E. Haber, “Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model,” Phys. Rev. D72, 035004 (2005) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D72, 099902 (2005)] [arXiv:hep-ph/0504050 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  37. [38]

    Phenomenology of two Higgs doublet models with flavor changing neutral currents,

    D. Atwood, L. Reina and A. Soni, “Phenomenology of two Higgs doublet models with flavor changing neutral currents,” Phys. Rev. D55, 3156-3176 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9609279 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1997

  38. [39]

    Exploring top quark FCNC within 2HDM type III in association with flavor physics,

    C. S. Kim, Y. W. Yoon and X. B. Yuan, “Exploring top quark FCNC within 2HDM type III in association with flavor physics,” JHEP12, 038 (2015) [arXiv:1509.00491 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  39. [40]

    Analysis of forward–backward and lepton polarization asymmetries in𝐵→𝐾 1ℓ+ℓ− decays in the two-Higgs-doublet model,

    N. Ahmed, I. Ahmed and M. J. Aslam, “Analysis of forward–backward and lepton polarization asymmetries in𝐵→𝐾 1ℓ+ℓ− decays in the two-Higgs-doublet model,” PTEP2015, no.11, 113B06 (2015) [arXiv:1509.08113 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  40. [41]

    RareΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− decay in the two-Higgs doublet model of type-III,

    R. F. Alnahdi, T. Barakat and H. A. Alhendi, “RareΛ 𝑏 →Λℓ +ℓ− decay in the two-Higgs doublet model of type-III,” PTEP2017, no.7, 073B04 (2017) [arXiv:1706.07361 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  41. [42]

    B –>X(s) tau+ tau- in a two Higgs doublet model,

    Y. B. Dai, C. S. Huang and H. W. Huang, “B –>X(s) tau+ tau- in a two Higgs doublet model,” Phys. Lett. B390, 257-262 (1997) [erratum: Phys. Lett. B513, 429-430 (2001)] [arXiv:hep-ph/9607389 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1997

  42. [43]

    Asymmetries in𝐵→𝐾 ∗ℓ+ℓ− Decays and Two Higgs Doublet Model,

    I. Ahmed, M. J. Aslam and M. A. Paracha, “Asymmetries in𝐵→𝐾 ∗ℓ+ℓ− Decays and Two Higgs Doublet Model,” [arXiv:1602.02400 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  43. [44]

    Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms

    G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras and M. E. Lautenbacher, “Weak Decays beyond Leading Logarithms,” Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 1125-1144 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9512380 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  44. [45]

    2HDMs predictions for anti-B —>X(s) gamma in NLO QCD,

    F. Borzumati and C. Greub, “2HDMs predictions for anti-B —>X(s) gamma in NLO QCD,” Phys. Rev. D58, 074004 (1998) [arXiv:hep- ph/9802391 [hep-ph]]. 28 FIG. 20. The representation of the𝐴 𝐹 𝐵 as a function of𝑞 2 for theΣ 𝑏 →Σ𝜇 + 𝜇− transition in SM and 2HDM models with long-distance contributions plotted against different Higgs masses for𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0.05,𝜆 𝑡𝑡 =0....

    work page arXiv 1998

  45. [46]

    Exclusive Lambda(b) —>Lambda lepton+ lepton- decay in two Higgs doublet model,

    T. M. Aliev and M. Savci, “Exclusive Lambda(b) —>Lambda lepton+ lepton- decay in two Higgs doublet model,” J. Phys. G26, 997-1010 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9906473 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2000

  46. [47]

    Theoretical uncertainties and phenomenological aspects of B —>X(s) gamma decay,

    A. J. Buras, M. Misiak, M. Munz and S. Pokorski, “Theoretical uncertainties and phenomenological aspects of B —>X(s) gamma decay,” Nucl. Phys. B424, 374-398 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9311345 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1994

  47. [48]

    Radiative B —>K* gamma transition in QCD,

    P. Colangelo, C. A. Dominguez, G. Nardulli and N. Paver, “Radiative B —>K* gamma transition in QCD,” Phys. Lett. B317, 183-189 (1993) [arXiv:hep-ph/9308264 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1993

  48. [49]

    Effective Hamiltonian for B —>X(s) e+ e- beyond leading logarithms in the NDR and HV schemes,

    A. J. Buras and M. Munz, “Effective Hamiltonian for B —>X(s) e+ e- beyond leading logarithms in the NDR and HV schemes,” Phys. Rev. D52, 186-195 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ph/9501281 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1995

  49. [50]

    Critical Reanalysis of CP Asymmetries in B0 Decays to CP Eigenstates,

    B. Grinstein, “Critical Reanalysis of CP Asymmetries in B0 Decays to CP Eigenstates,” Phys. Lett. B229, 280-284 (1989)

    1989

  50. [51]

    A New measurement of the rare decay K+ —>pi+ mu+ mu-,

    H. Maet al.[e865], “A New measurement of the rare decay K+ —>pi+ mu+ mu-,” Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2580-2583 (2000) [arXiv:hep- ex/9910047 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2000

  51. [52]

    Semileptonic transition ofΣ𝑏 toΣin Light Cone QCD Sum Rules,

    K. Azizi, M. Bayar, A. Ozpineci, Y. Sarac and H. Sundu, “Semileptonic transition ofΣ𝑏 toΣin Light Cone QCD Sum Rules,” Phys. Rev. D85, 016002 (2012) [arXiv:1112.5147 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  52. [53]

    Form factors forΛ 𝑏 →Λtransitions in the soft-collinear effective theory,

    T. Feldmann and M. W. Y. Yip, “Form factors forΛ 𝑏 →Λtransitions in the soft-collinear effective theory,” Phys. Rev. D85, 014035 (2012) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D86, 079901 (2012)] [arXiv:1111.1844 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  53. [54]

    Perturbative Corrections toΛ𝑏 →ΛForm Factors from QCD Light-Cone Sum Rules,

    Y. M. Wang and Y. L. Shen, “Perturbative Corrections toΛ𝑏 →ΛForm Factors from QCD Light-Cone Sum Rules,” JHEP02, 179 (2016) [arXiv:1511.09036 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2016

  54. [55]

    Ξ 𝑏 →Ξform factors from lattice QCD and Standard-Model predictions forΞ 𝑏 →Ξ𝜇 + 𝜇− andΞ 𝑏 →Ξ𝛾 decays,

    C. Farrell and S. Meinel, “Ξ 𝑏 →Ξform factors from lattice QCD and Standard-Model predictions forΞ 𝑏 →Ξ𝜇 + 𝜇− andΞ 𝑏 →Ξ𝛾 decays,” [arXiv:2603.18438 [hep-lat]]

    work page arXiv

  55. [56]

    Review of particle physics,

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.3, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  56. [57]

    Next-to-leading QCD corrections to𝐵→𝑋 𝑠𝛾: Standard model and two Higgs doublet model,

    M. Ciuchini, G. Degrassi, P. Gambino and G. F. Giudice, “Next-to-leading QCD corrections to𝐵→𝑋 𝑠𝛾: Standard model and two Higgs doublet model,” Nucl. Phys. B527, 21-43 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9710335 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1998

  57. [58]

    Measurement of the differential branching fraction of the decayΛ 0 𝑏 →Λ𝜇 + 𝜇−,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Measurement of the differential branching fraction of the decayΛ 0 𝑏 →Λ𝜇 + 𝜇−,” Phys. Lett. B725, 25-35 (2013) [arXiv:1306.2577 [hep-ex]]. 29 FIG. 21. The representation of the𝐴 𝐹 𝐵 as a function of𝑞 2 for theΣ 𝑏 →Σ𝜇 + 𝜇− transition in SM and 2HDM models without long-distance contributions plotted against different Higgs masses for𝜆 ...

    work page arXiv 2013