pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15860 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Recognition: unknown

Phase behavior of thermoresponsive colloids drives re-entrant plasmon coupling

Angela Capocefalo (1 , 2) , Francesco Brasili (1 , Javier P\'erez (3) , Edouard Chauveau (4) , Stefano Casciardi (5) , Andrea Militello (5) , Francesco Sciortino (2)
show 9 more authors
Emanuela Zaccarelli (1 Federico Bordi (2) Domenico Truzzolillo (4) Simona Sennato (1 2) ((1) Institute for Complex Systems of National Research Council (2) Department of Physics of Sapienza University of Rome (3) Synchrotron SOLEIL (4) Laboratoire Charles Coulomb of CNRS-Universit\'e de Montpellier (5) National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work)
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords thermoresponsive microgelsplasmonic nanoparticlescolloidal stabilityplasmon couplingre-entrant behaviorhybrid colloidsphase diagram
0
0 comments X

The pith

Plasmon coupling in thermoresponsive microgel-nanoparticle hybrids exhibits re-entrant behavior controlled by colloidal stability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that plasmon coupling between nanoparticles embedded in thermoresponsive microgels does not depend only on their spacing inside each microgel. Instead, the overall optical response also tracks whether the entire hybrid complexes stay dispersed or clump together. At moderate nanoparticle numbers, the particles create uneven charges on the microgel surface, causing the complexes to aggregate and bringing nanoparticles from different microgels close enough to couple more strongly. At higher loadings the complexes stabilize again and coupling weakens to the level set by spacing within single particles. This identifies stability as an extra control knob for temperature-tunable optical materials.

Core claim

Plasmon coupling is governed not only by the interparticle distance between NPs confined within individual microgels, but also by the colloidal stability of the hybrid complexes. At intermediate NP loadings, surface charge inhomogeneities induced by NP adsorption promote aggregation of microgel-NPs complexes, resulting in enhanced plasmon coupling. In contrast, when the complexes remain colloidally stable, coupling is dictated solely by NP organization within the corona of individual microgels. A quantitative relationship between plasmon coupling and interparticle distance reveals two distinct coupling regimes, rationalized through a phase diagram linking colloidal stability to optical re

What carries the argument

Colloidal stability of hybrid microgel-NP complexes, modulated by NP-induced surface charge inhomogeneities that trigger aggregation at intermediate loadings.

If this is right

  • Enhanced plasmon coupling occurs when complexes aggregate at intermediate NP loadings due to charge inhomogeneities.
  • Coupling reduces to intra-microgel NP spacing when complexes are colloidally stable at low or high loadings.
  • Two distinct regimes of plasmon coupling exist depending on whether aggregation happens.
  • The optical response can be mapped to a phase diagram of colloidal stability versus NP loading.
  • Programmable optical properties arise from tuning NP-to-microgel ratio to exploit the re-entrant effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Controlling the surface charge distribution on microgels could allow independent tuning of the aggregation threshold without altering NP count.
  • The re-entrant optical behavior might extend to other hybrid colloidal systems where particle adsorption creates patchy charges.
  • These findings could guide the design of temperature-responsive optical switches or sensors that operate through stability transitions.
  • Experimental tests varying temperature across the volume phase transition while holding NP loading fixed could separate the stability and spacing contributions more clearly.

Load-bearing premise

That the re-entrant plasmon coupling specifically results from aggregation caused by NP-induced surface charge inhomogeneities at intermediate loadings.

What would settle it

Measurements showing no aggregation of hybrid complexes at the NP loadings where plasmon coupling peaks, or finding that coupling strength does not correlate with signs of clustering in scattering data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15860 by 2), 2) ((1) Institute for Complex Systems of National Research Council, (2) Department of Physics of Sapienza University of Rome, (3) Synchrotron SOLEIL, (4) Laboratoire Charles Coulomb of CNRS-Universit\'e de Montpellier, (5) National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work), Andrea Militello (5), Angela Capocefalo (1, Domenico Truzzolillo (4), Edouard Chauveau (4), Emanuela Zaccarelli (1, Federico Bordi (2), Francesco Brasili (1, Francesco Sciortino (2), Javier P\'erez (3), Simona Sennato (1, Stefano Casciardi (5).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Extinction spectra of microgel-NPs as a function of temperature for selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Shift of the LSPR peak ∆λLSPR and (b) degree of plasmon coupling ∆(AC /Atot), defined as the spectral weight of the region of coupled plasmon modes (λ > 570 nm, Equation 1), as a function of n for different T. sensitive to changes in the dielectric environment caused by water expulsion across the VPT, and failing to fully capture the emergence of coupled plasmon modes at longer wavelengths. In contrast… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Structure factors of the microgel-NPs samples as a function of temperature for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Surface-to-surface distance d between NPs as a function of n for different temperatures, derived from structure factors of NPs incorporated in the microgel corona; the horizontal dashed line (d = 23.7 nm) marks the intersection between the exponential fits in panel b. b) Degree of plasmon coupling ∆(AC /Atot) as a function of d; dashed lines are the fits to exponential decay. Following the model in ref.… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hydrodynamic radius RH (a) and electrophoretic mobility µe (b) of the microgel￾NPs complexes as a function of n, for different temperatures across the VPT. (c) Degree of plasmon coupling ∆(AC /Atot) as a function of RH(n, T)/RH(n, 25°C); the vertical dashed line divides the region of colloidal stability from that of complex aggregation (shaded in gray). (d) Representative electron microscopy images of the … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase diagram of microgel-NPs in the n − T plane: the dashed black line delineates the boundary between colloidal stability of the complexes and the aggregation region (shaded in gray), as identified from DLS measurements by applying the threshold RH(n, T) > RH(n, 25°C), to define the aggregation onset; the colored points denote the samples for which extinction spectra were collected: we used the same mark… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Plasmonic nanoparticles (NPs) integrated within thermoresponsive polymeric microgels provide a versatile platform for the realization of stimuli-responsive optical materials, where the microgel volume phase transition enables dynamic control of plasmon coupling. This study uncovers a counter-intuitive re-entrant behavior with increasing NP loading in which plasmon coupling initially strengthens and subsequently weakens beyond a critical NP-to-microgel number ratio. By combining light and X-ray scattering techniques with optical spectroscopy and electrophoretic mobility measurements, it is demonstrated that plasmon coupling is governed not only by the interparticle distance between NPs confined within individual microgels, but also by the colloidal stability of the hybrid complexes. At intermediate NP loadings, surface charge inhomogeneities induced by NP adsorption promote aggregation of microgel-NPs complexes, resulting in enhanced plasmon coupling. In contrast, when the complexes remain colloidally stable, coupling is dictated solely by NP organization within the corona of individual microgels. A quantitative relationship between plasmon coupling and interparticle distance reveals two distinct coupling regimes. This behavior is rationalized through a phase diagram linking colloidal stability to optical response. These findings identify colloidal stability as a key parameter for designing soft plasmonic systems with programmable optical properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a re-entrant plasmon coupling behavior in thermoresponsive microgel-nanoparticle hybrids as a function of NP loading. It claims that plasmon coupling is controlled by both intra-microgel NP spacing and overall colloidal stability of the complexes; at intermediate loadings, NP adsorption creates surface charge inhomogeneities that drive aggregation and thereby enhance coupling, while at higher loadings the complexes restabilize and coupling reverts to being dictated solely by organization within individual microgel coronas. The authors support this with a combination of light/X-ray scattering, optical spectroscopy, and electrophoretic mobility, culminating in a phase diagram that links stability to the observed optical response and identifies two distinct coupling regimes.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant for the design of stimuli-responsive plasmonic soft materials. It correctly identifies colloidal stability as an additional design handle beyond the conventional volume-phase-transition control of interparticle distance. The multi-technique experimental strategy is appropriate for the system and the re-entrant optical signature is a clear, falsifiable observation. The explicit linkage of stability to optical regimes via a phase diagram provides a useful conceptual framework, even if the mechanistic attribution requires further support.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and electrophoretic mobility/scattering results] Abstract and the section presenting electrophoretic mobility and scattering results: the claim that surface charge inhomogeneities (rather than net charge reduction, NP bridging, or internal restructuring) are the dominant driver of aggregation at intermediate loadings is load-bearing for the re-entrant mechanism. Electrophoretic mobility yields only the average zeta potential and scattering reports aggregate formation; neither directly demonstrates patchiness. Without a control (e.g., uniformly charged microgels or fixed NP distribution) or direct spatial evidence, alternative explanations cannot be ruled out.
  2. [Quantitative relationship and phase diagram] Section describing the quantitative relationship between plasmon coupling and interparticle distance: the existence of two distinct coupling regimes is asserted, yet the manuscript provides no error bars on the extracted distances (from X-ray structure factors), no fitting details for the coupling strength, and no statistical test for the regime boundary. This gap prevents verification that the optical transition coincides with the stability crossover reported in the phase diagram.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the NP-to-microgel number ratios, temperature ranges, and ionic strengths used for each data set to allow direct comparison with the phase diagram.
  2. [Introduction] All acronyms (NP, VPT, etc.) should be defined at first use in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and for recognizing the potential significance of the re-entrant plasmon coupling behavior. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and electrophoretic mobility/scattering results] Abstract and the section presenting electrophoretic mobility and scattering results: the claim that surface charge inhomogeneities (rather than net charge reduction, NP bridging, or internal restructuring) are the dominant driver of aggregation at intermediate loadings is load-bearing for the re-entrant mechanism. Electrophoretic mobility yields only the average zeta potential and scattering reports aggregate formation; neither directly demonstrates patchiness. Without a control (e.g., uniformly charged microgels or fixed NP distribution) or direct spatial evidence, alternative explanations cannot be ruled out.

    Authors: We agree that electrophoretic mobility reports only the average zeta potential and that scattering confirms aggregate formation without directly visualizing charge patchiness. However, the re-entrant stability trend—destabilization at intermediate loadings followed by restabilization at high loadings—cannot be accounted for by monotonic net-charge reduction alone, as higher NP coverage would further decrease net charge if adsorption were uniform. Our temperature-dependent scattering and spectroscopy data show that internal NP restructuring is minimal below the VPT, and NP bridging is inconsistent with the observed recovery of stability. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly discuss these alternatives, weaken the mechanistic claim to a correlation-based interpretation supported by the phase diagram, and add a limitations paragraph noting the absence of direct spatial evidence or uniform-charge controls. This is a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Quantitative relationship and phase diagram] Section describing the quantitative relationship between plasmon coupling and interparticle distance: the existence of two distinct coupling regimes is asserted, yet the manuscript provides no error bars on the extracted distances (from X-ray structure factors), no fitting details for the coupling strength, and no statistical test for the regime boundary. This gap prevents verification that the optical transition coincides with the stability crossover reported in the phase diagram.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. In the revised version we will (i) add error bars to all interparticle distances extracted from X-ray structure factors, (ii) move the full fitting procedure, model equations, and parameter values for the plasmon coupling strength to the SI, and (iii) include a statistical analysis (piecewise linear regression with change-point detection) to identify the regime boundary and test its coincidence with the stability crossover. These additions will enable independent verification of the two-regime claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental claims rest on direct measurements

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental study combining light/X-ray scattering, optical spectroscopy, and electrophoretic mobility data to observe re-entrant plasmon coupling and link it to colloidal stability. No mathematical derivation, first-principles prediction, or fitted parameter is presented whose output is forced by construction to equal its input. Central claims (two coupling regimes, stability-driven aggregation at intermediate loadings) are interpretations of measured quantities rather than self-referential equations or self-citation chains. Any self-citations present are not load-bearing for the primary results, which remain falsifiable against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard colloidal science concepts and experimental observations; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Colloidal stability of microgel-NP complexes is governed by surface charge inhomogeneities and interparticle interactions.
    Invoked to explain aggregation at intermediate NP loadings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5639 in / 1242 out tokens · 73829 ms · 2026-05-10T07:30:19.528563+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Karg, T. Hellweg, New “smart” poly(NIPAM) microgels and nanoparticle microgel hybrids: Properties and advances in characterisa- tion, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 14 (2009) 438–450. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2009.08.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2009.08.002 2009

  2. [2]

    M. Arif, Z. H. Farooqi, A. Irfan, R. Begum, Gold nanoparticles and polymer microgels: Last five years of their happy and suc- cessful marriage, Journal of Molecular Liquids 336 (2021) 116270. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116270

    work page doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116270 2021

  3. [3]

    Diehl, S

    F. Diehl, S. Hageneder, S. Fossati, S. K. Auer, J. Dostalek, U. Jonas, Plasmonic nanomaterials with responsive polymer hydrogels for sens- ing and actuation, Chemical Society Reviews 51 (2022) 3926–3963. doi:10.1039/d1cs01083b

    work page doi:10.1039/d1cs01083b 2022

  4. [4]

    Fernandez-Nieves, H

    A. Fernandez-Nieves, H. Wyss, J. Mattsson, D. A. Weitz, Microgel Sus- pensions: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2011

    2011

  5. [5]

    Suzuki, Nanogel/microgel science and beyond, Langmuir 39 (2023) 7525–7529

    D. Suzuki, Nanogel/microgel science and beyond, Langmuir 39 (2023) 7525–7529. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00560

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00560 2023

  6. [6]

    N. J. Halas, S. Lal, W.-S. Chang, S. Link, P. Nordlander, Plasmons in strongly coupled metallic nanostructures, Chemical reviews 111 (2011) 3913–3961. doi:10.1021/cr200061k

    work page doi:10.1021/cr200061k 2011

  7. [7]

    Amendola, R

    V. Amendola, R. Pilot, M. Frasconi, O. M. Maragò, M. A. Iatì, Surface plasmon resonance in gold nanoparticles: a review, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29 (2017) 203002. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/aa60f3

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa60f3 2017

  8. [8]

    L. Wang, M. Hasanzadeh Kafshgari, M. Meunier, Optical properties andapplicationsofplasmonic-metalnanoparticles, AdvancedFunctional Materials 30 (2020) 2005400. doi:10.1002/adfm.202005400

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202005400 2020

  9. [9]

    Biswasray, C

    D. Biswasray, C. E. Petoukhoff, B. M. K. Mariserla, Unified model for plasmon coupling in metal nanoparticles and effect of the polymer 18 shell, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 129 (2025) 10633–10642. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08778

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08778 2025

  10. [10]

    Gorelikov, L

    I. Gorelikov, L. M. Field, E. Kumacheva, Hybrid microgels photore- sponsive in the near-infrared spectral range, Journal of the American Chemical Society 126 (2004) 15938–15939. doi:10.1021/ja0448869

    work page doi:10.1021/ja0448869 2004

  11. [11]

    Lange, B

    H. Lange, B. H. Juarez, A. Carl, M. Richter, N. G. Bastus, H. Weller, C. Thomsen, R. von Klitzing, A. Knorr, Tunable plasmon coupling in distance-controlled gold nanoparticles, Langmuir 28 (2012) 8862–8866. doi:10.1021/la3001575

    work page doi:10.1021/la3001575 2012

  12. [12]

    Gawlitza, S

    K. Gawlitza, S. T. Turner, F. Polzer, S. Wellert, M. Karg, P. Mulvaney, R. von Klitzing, Interaction of gold nanoparticles with thermorespon- sive microgels: Influence of the cross-linker density on optical prop- erties, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 15 (2013) 15623–15631. doi:10.1039/c3cp51578h

    work page doi:10.1039/c3cp51578h 2013

  13. [13]

    Honold, K

    T. Honold, K. Volk, A. Rauh, J. Fitzgerald, M. Karg, Tunable plasmonic surfaces via colloid assembly, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 3 (2015) 11449–11457. doi:10.1039/c5tc02115d

    work page doi:10.1039/c5tc02115d 2015

  14. [14]

    Z. Ye, C. Chen, L. Cao, Z. Cai, C. Xu, H.-I. Kim, J. P. Giraldo, A. G. Kanaras, Y. Yin, Reversible modulation of plasmonic cou- pling of gold nanoparticles confined within swellable polymer colloidal spheres, Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2024) e202408020. doi:10.1002/anie.202408020

    work page doi:10.1002/anie.202408020 2024

  15. [15]

    Brasili, A

    F. Brasili, A. Capocefalo, G. Del Monte, R. Rivas-Barbosa, J. Pérez, E. Chauveau, F. Bordi, C. Rizza, D. Truzzolillo, E. Zaccarelli, S. Sen- nato, Linking structure and optical properties of plasmonic nanoparti- cles on tunable spherical surfaces, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 17 (2025) 47385–47395. doi:10.1021/acsami.5c11151

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.5c11151 2025

  16. [16]

    A. Choe, J. Yeom, R. Shanker, M. P. Kim, S. Kang, H. Ko, Stretchable and wearable colorimetric patches based on thermoresponsive plasmonic microgels embedded in a hydrogel film, NPG Asia Materials 10 (2018) 912–922. doi:10.1038/s41427-018-0086-6. 19

    work page doi:10.1038/s41427-018-0086-6 2018

  17. [17]

    Sershen, S

    S. Sershen, S. Westcott, N. Halas, J. West, Temperature-sensitive polymer–nanoshell composites for photothermally modulated drug de- livery, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 51 (2000) 293–298. doi:10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<293::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-T

    work page doi:10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3 2000

  18. [18]

    M. Das, N. Sanson, D. Fava, E. Kumacheva, Microgels loaded with gold nanorods: Photothermally triggered volume transitions under physio- logical conditions, Langmuir 23 (2007) 196–201. doi:10.1021/la061596s

    work page doi:10.1021/la061596s 2007

  19. [19]

    Chang, Y

    K. Chang, Y. Yan, D. Zhang, Y. Xia, X. Chen, L. Lei, S. Shi, Syn- ergistic bonding of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based hybrid micro- gels and gold nanoparticles used for temperature-responsive controllable catalysis of p-nitrophenol reduction, Langmuir 39 (2023) 2408–2421. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03236

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03236 2023

  20. [20]

    Sajid, A

    I. Sajid, A. Hassan, W. Wu, J. Zhang, K. S. Munawar, A. Irfan, A. R. Chaudhry, Z. H. Farooqi, R. Begum, Synthesis, characteriza- tion, and catalytic applications of gold nanoparticles endowed in poly(N- isopropylmethacrylamide)nanogels, JournalofMolecularLiquids(2025) 127890. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127890

    work page doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127890 2025

  21. [21]

    Y. Chen, B. Ai, Z. J. Wong, Soft optical metamaterials, Nano Conver- gence 7 (2020) 18. doi:10.1186/s40580-020-00226-7

    work page doi:10.1186/s40580-020-00226-7 2020

  22. [22]

    L.-L. Ma, Y. Wei, N. Wang, W. Chen, Y.-Q. Lu, Soft matter photonics: Interplay of soft matter and light, ACS nano 19 (2025) 11501–11516. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c02465

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c02465 2025

  23. [23]

    Regmi, S

    R. Regmi, S. R. Bhattarai, C. Sudakar, A. S. Wani, R. Cunning- ham, P. P. Vaishnava, R. Naik, D. Oupicky, G. Lawes, Hyper- thermia controlled rapid drug release from thermosensitive magnetic microgels, Journal of Materials Chemistry 20 (2010) 6158–6163. doi:10.1039/c0jm00844c

    work page doi:10.1039/c0jm00844c 2010

  24. [24]

    P. T. Davies, B. Vincent, Uptake of anionic gold nanoparticles by cationic microgel particles in dispersion: the effect of pH, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 354 (2010) 99–

    2010

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.07.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.07.011 2009

  26. [26]

    Bradley, B

    M. Bradley, B. S. Garcia-Risueño, Symmetric and asymmetric adsorp- tion of pH–responsive gold nanoparticles onto microgel particles and 20 dispersion characterisation, Journal of colloid and interface science 355 (2011) 321–327. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.027 2011

  27. [27]

    Brasili, G

    F. Brasili, G. Del Monte, A. Capocefalo, E. Chauveau, E. Buratti, S. Casciardi, D. Truzzolillo, S. Sennato, E. Zaccarelli, Toward a uni- fied description of the electrostatic assembly of microgels and nanopar- ticles, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15 (2023) 58770–58783. doi:10.1021/acsami.3c14608

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.3c14608 2023

  28. [29]

    Truzzolillo, S

    D. Truzzolillo, S. Sennato, S. Sarti, S. Casciardi, C. Bazzoni, F. Bordi, Overcharging and reentrant condensation of thermoresponsive ionic mi- crogels, Soft Matter 14 (2018) 4110–4125. doi:10.1039/c7sm02357j

    work page doi:10.1039/c7sm02357j 2018

  29. [30]

    Sennato, E

    S. Sennato, E. Chauveau, S. Casciardi, F. Bordi, D. Truzzolillo, The double-faced electrostatic behavior of PNIPAm microgels, Polymers 13 (2021) 1153. doi:10.3390/polym13071153

    work page doi:10.3390/polym13071153 2021

  30. [31]

    Brasili, A

    F. Brasili, A. Capocefalo, D. Palmieri, F. Capitani, E. Chiessi, G. Paradossi, F. Bordi, F. Domenici, Assembling patchy plas- monic nanoparticles with aggregation-dependent antibacterial activ- ity, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 580 (2020) 419–428. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.006 2020

  31. [32]

    Capocefalo, T

    A. Capocefalo, T. Bizien, S. Sennato, N. Ghofraniha, F. Bordi, F. Brasili, Responsivity of fractal nanoparticle assemblies to multiple stimuli: Structural insights on the modulation of the optical properties, Nanomaterials 12 (2022) 1529. doi:10.3390/nano12091529

    work page doi:10.3390/nano12091529 2022

  32. [33]

    Palmieri, F

    D. Palmieri, F. Brasili, A. Capocefalo, T. Bizien, I. Angelini, L. Oddo, Y. Toumia, G. Paradossi, F. Domenici, Improved hybrid-shelled perfluo- rocarbon microdroplets as ultrasound-and laser-activated phase-change platform, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 641 (2022) 128522. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128522

    work page doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128522 2022

  33. [34]

    Suzuki, Y

    D. Suzuki, Y. Nagase, T. Kureha, T. Sato, Internal structures of ther- mosensitive hybrid microgels investigated by means of small-angle x-ray 21 scattering, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 118 (2014) 2194–2204. doi:10.1021/jp410983x

    work page doi:10.1021/jp410983x 2014

  34. [35]

    S. W. Provencher, A constrained regularization method for invert- ing data represented by linear algebraic or integral equations, Com- puter Physics Communications 27 (1982) 213–227. doi:10.1016/0010- 4655(82)90173-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0010- 1982

  35. [36]

    W. W. Tscharnuter, Mobility measurements by phase analysis, Applied optics 40 (2001) 3995–4003. doi:10.1364/ao.40.003995

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.40.003995 2001

  36. [37]

    P. K. Jain, W. Huang, M. A. El-Sayed, On the universal scaling be- havior of the distance decay of plasmon coupling in metal nanoparti- cle pairs: a plasmon ruler equation, Nano letters 7 (2007) 2080–2088. doi:10.1021/nl071008a

    work page doi:10.1021/nl071008a 2007

  37. [38]

    Esteban, R

    R. Esteban, R. W. Taylor, J. J. Baumberg, J. Aizpurua, How chain plas- mons govern the optical response in strongly interacting self-assembled metallic clusters of nanoparticles, Langmuir 28 (2012) 8881–8890. doi:10.1021/la300198r

    work page doi:10.1021/la300198r 2012

  38. [39]

    R. W. Taylor, T.-C. Lee, O. A. Scherman, R. Esteban, J. Aizpu- rua, F. M. Huang, J. J. Baumberg, S. Mahajan, Precise subnanome- ter plasmonic junctions for SERS within gold nanoparticle assem- blies using cucurbit[n]uril “glue”, ACS nano 5 (2011) 3878–3887. doi:10.1021/nn200250v

    work page doi:10.1021/nn200250v 2011

  39. [40]

    A. Y. Grosberg, T. Nguyen, B. Shklovskii, Colloquium: The physics of charge inversion in chemical and biological systems, Reviews of modern physics 74 (2002) 329. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.329

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.329 2002

  40. [41]

    QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open -source software project for quantum simulations of materials

    D. Truzzolillo, V. Roger, C. Dupas, S. Mora, L. Cipelletti, Bulk and interfacial stresses in suspensions of soft and hard colloids, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27 (2015) 194103. doi:10.1088/0953- 8984/27/19/194103

    work page doi:10.1088/0953- 2015

  41. [42]

    Fasolato, F

    C. Fasolato, F. Domenici, S. Sennato, F. Mura, L. De Angelis, F. Lu- ongo, F. Costantini, F. Bordi, P. Postorino, Dimensional scale ef- fects on surface enhanced raman scattering efficiency of self-assembled silver nanoparticle clusters, Applied Physics Letters 105 (2014). doi:10.1063/1.4893373. 22

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4893373 2014

  42. [43]

    T. Ung, L. M. Liz-Marzán, P. Mulvaney, Optical properties of thin films of Au@SiO2 particles, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 105 (2001) 3441–3452. doi:10.1021/jp003500n. 23

    work page doi:10.1021/jp003500n 2001