pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15912 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Sensing of Low-Frequency Electric Fields Using Rydberg EIT within the Fisher Information Framework

Tianyu Zhou , Haipeng Xie , Xin Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Rydberg atomselectromagnetically induced transparencyelectric field sensingFisher informationlow-frequency fieldsCramér-Rao boundFabry-Pérot cavity
0
0 comments X

The pith

DC-biased differential readout and cavity enhancement let Rydberg EIT sense low-frequency electric fields down to 10^{-4} V/m per square-root Hertz.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a Fisher-information model of electromagnetically induced transparency in Rydberg atoms to set fundamental precision limits for sensing quasi-DC and low-frequency electric fields. It introduces a linearized two-point differential measurement that uses a static DC bias to convert the otherwise quadratic, insensitive response near zero field into a linear, high-slope signal for both static and oscillating fields. Numerical evaluation shows this scheme reaches a Cramér-Rao-limited sensitivity of roughly 1×10^{-4} V/m/√Hz. Placing the atoms inside a Fabry-Pérot cavity and using intracavity phase modulation is shown to increase the extractable Fisher information by more than two orders of magnitude relative to free-space geometries. The work supplies design equations and performance bounds intended for high-precision electromagnetic monitoring in power grids.

Core claim

Within the Fisher-information and Cramér-Rao framework, a DC-biased two-point differential EIT readout removes the weak-field quadratic suppression for both DC and AC low-frequency fields, attaining a CRLB-limited sensitivity of approximately 1×10^{-4} V/m/√Hz; embedding the same atoms in a Fabry-Pérot cavity and applying intracavity phase modulation steepens the transmission slope and raises the Fisher information by more than two orders of magnitude over single-pass free-space operation.

What carries the argument

Fisher-information analysis of the EIT transmission spectrum under DC-biased differential readout and Fabry-Pérot intracavity phase modulation.

If this is right

  • The DC-biased differential scheme converts the quadratic field response near zero into a linear slope usable for both static and oscillating low-frequency fields.
  • Numerical results place the Cramér-Rao lower bound on sensitivity at approximately 1×10^{-4} V/m/√Hz.
  • The Fabry-Pérot configuration with intracavity phase modulation increases Fisher information by more than two orders of magnitude compared with free-space EIT.
  • The modeling framework supplies quantitative design guidance for quantum-based electromagnetic monitoring in smart-grid environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the modeled sensitivity is realized experimentally, the technique could enable continuous, SI-traceable monitoring of power-line fields at distances where conventional sensors lose resolution.
  • The same Fisher-information approach could be applied to other Rydberg transitions or to simultaneous electric and magnetic field sensing by adding a second probe laser.
  • Practical limits will likely arise from atomic motion, laser phase noise, and cavity stability, none of which are quantified in the present calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The EIT readout model and linearized DC-biased differential measurement accurately represent the physical response of Rydberg atoms to low-frequency fields without unaccounted decoherence, nonlinearities, or other effects that would invalidate the Fisher information calculations.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the actual electric-field sensitivity of a Rydberg EIT probe, with and without the DC bias and cavity, and checks whether the observed noise-equivalent field reaches or exceeds the predicted 1×10^{-4} V/m/√Hz bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15912 by Haipeng Xie, Tianyu Zhou, Xin Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1: Schematic overview of the proposed low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2: Cascade three-level scheme for EIT. The probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIGURE 3: Simulated spectra (EIT and ATS) versus cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIGURE 4: Quadratic Stark response and the corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5: FI analysis of Stark shift estimation in the cascade EIT system. (a) FI map in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIGURE 6: Schematic of the DC-biased two-point differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIGURE 7: Numerical validation of the DC-biased two-point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIGURE 8: FI optimization and CRLB-limited resolution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIGURE 9: Noise robustness comparison between the baseline and proposed readout schemes. (a) Time-domain single-point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIGURE 10: Schematic of the cavity EIT configuration for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIGURE 11: Performance comparison between free-space EIT and cavity-enhanced EIT. (a) Transmission spectrum of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIGURE 12: Summary of the performance enhancement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Rydberg atoms, which possess exceptionally large electric dipole moments, offer a promising route for electric field sensing as well as metrology traceable to the International System of Units (SI); however, current research predominantly focuses on the microwave (MW) regime, leaving the quasi-direct current (quasi-DC) and low-frequency bands, ubiquitous in power systems, largely unexplored. In this paper, we present a theoretical investigation into low-frequency electric field detection. To this end, we establish a comprehensive modeling framework incorporating Fisher information (FI) and the Cram\'{e}r-Rao lower bound (CRLB) to quantify the fundamental precision limits of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) readouts. Building upon this framework, we propose a linearized sensing strategy utilizing a DC-biased two-point differential measurement. Numerical validations demonstrate that this approach effectively mitigates the weak-field insensitivity for both DC and AC fields, achieving a CRLB-limited sensitivity bound of approximately $1\times 10^{-4}$ V/m/$\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$. Furthermore, to surpass the single-pass sensitivity limit, we introduce a Fabry-P\'{e}rot (FP) cavity-enhanced configuration. This architecture leverages intracavity phase modulation to significantly steepen the transmission slope, boosting the FI by over two orders of magnitude compared to standard free-space configurations. This work provides a rigorous theoretical basis and design guidance for the high-precision quantum monitoring of electromagnetic environments in smart grids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Fisher information (FI) and Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) framework to quantify the fundamental precision limits of Rydberg EIT readouts for low-frequency (quasi-DC and low-frequency AC) electric field sensing. It proposes a linearized DC-biased two-point differential measurement to mitigate weak-field insensitivity and presents numerical validations claiming a CRLB-limited sensitivity of approximately 1×10^{-4} V/m/√Hz. A Fabry-Pérot cavity-enhanced configuration is introduced that uses intracavity phase modulation to boost the FI by over two orders of magnitude relative to free-space setups, providing theoretical guidance for high-precision monitoring in applications such as smart grids.

Significance. If the EIT transmission model and linearized differential scheme accurately capture the atom-field response, this work supplies a rigorous theoretical basis for extending Rydberg-based electric field metrology into the low-frequency regime. The application of standard FI/CRLB tools to this underexplored band, together with the explicit numerical validations of the differential strategy and the cavity-induced FI enhancement, constitutes a clear strength that can guide future experiments. The claimed sensitivity bound and two-order FI improvement would be impactful for SI-traceable sensing if the modeling assumptions are robust.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical validations] The numerical validations demonstrating mitigation of weak-field insensitivity and the CRLB-limited sensitivity bound of 1×10^{-4} V/m/√Hz rest on the EIT readout model combined with the linearized DC-biased differential measurement. Potential low-frequency decoherence channels (e.g., velocity-changing collisions or laser-frequency noise coupling) are not analyzed; if they contribute additional variance or distort the transmission slope, the computed FI and CRLB cease to be tight physical limits and the central sensitivity claims require revision.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the FP cavity boosts the FI by 'over two orders of magnitude'; a specific numerical factor or reference to the relevant figure/table in the main text would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive evaluation of our Fisher information framework for Rydberg EIT-based low-frequency electric field sensing. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The numerical validations demonstrating mitigation of weak-field insensitivity and the CRLB-limited sensitivity bound of 1×10^{-4} V/m/√Hz rest on the EIT readout model combined with the linearized DC-biased differential measurement. Potential low-frequency decoherence channels (e.g., velocity-changing collisions or laser-frequency noise coupling) are not analyzed; if they contribute additional variance or distort the transmission slope, the computed FI and CRLB cease to be tight physical limits and the central sensitivity claims require revision.

    Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this limitation. Our numerical validations rely on the standard EIT transmission model under idealized conditions and do not incorporate additional low-frequency decoherence mechanisms such as velocity-changing collisions or laser-frequency noise. These effects would indeed introduce extra variance and potentially modify the transmission slope, meaning the reported FI and CRLB represent theoretical bounds within the model assumptions rather than tight experimental limits. We agree that the manuscript should explicitly address this. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated discussion subsection on these potential decoherence channels, their possible impact on the computed quantities, and a clear statement that the CRLB sensitivity of ~1×10^{-4} V/m/√Hz is the fundamental limit under the idealized EIT model. This revision will appropriately scope the claims without altering the core results or framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard FI/CRLB to EIT model

full rationale

The paper constructs an EIT transmission model for Rydberg atoms under low-frequency fields, then applies the externally established Fisher information and Cramér-Rao lower bound formalism to derive sensitivity limits for a DC-biased differential readout and an FP cavity enhancement. Numerical validations compute FI values and the resulting CRLB directly from this model for varying field amplitudes, showing mitigation of weak-field insensitivity and a two-order FI boost from intracavity modulation. No load-bearing step reduces to self-definition, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains; the CRLB bound is the intended mathematical consequence of the FI calculation rather than an independent claim smuggled in by construction. The framework remains self-contained against standard statistical tools and the stated physical model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted or verified from the provided text. The sensitivity bound appears derived from numerical modeling rather than direct fitting.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1262 out tokens · 58027 ms · 2026-05-10T08:20:53.232944+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The path of the smart grid,

    H. Farhangi, “The path of the smart grid,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2010

    2010

  2. [2]

    Toward a smart grid: power delivery for the 21st century,

    S. Massoud Amin and B. Wollenberg, “Toward a smart grid: power delivery for the 21st century,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 34–41, 2005

    2005

  3. [3]

    Liu, Ultra-high voltage AC/DC grids

    Z. Liu, Ultra-high voltage AC/DC grids. Academic Press, 2014

    2014

  4. [4]

    Kuffel and P

    J. Kuffel and P. Kuffel, High voltage engineering fundamentals. Elsevier, 2000

    2000

  5. [5]

    Sensors for electromagnetic pulse measurements both inside and away from nuclear source regions,

    C. Baum, E. Breen, J. Giles, J. O’Neill, and G. Sower, “Sensors for electromagnetic pulse measurements both inside and away from nuclear source regions,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 22–35, 1978

    1978

  6. [6]

    Electrostatic charge and field sensors based on micromechanical resonators,

    P. Riehl, K. Scott, R. Muller, R. Howe, and J. Yasaitis, “Electrostatic charge and field sensors based on micromechanical resonators,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 577–589, 2003

    2003

  7. [7]

    Simultaneous measurement of two orthogonal components of electric field using a pockels device,

    K. Hidaka, T. Kouno, and I. Hayashi, “Simultaneous measurement of two orthogonal components of electric field using a pockels device,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1252–1257, 07 1989. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1140299

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1140299 1989

  8. [8]

    Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,

    B. Chmielak, M. Waldow, C. Matheisen, C. Ripperda, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Nagel, F. Merget, and H. Kurz, “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 17 212–17 219, Aug 2011. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-18-17212

    2011

  9. [9]

    Development of kerr electro-optic 3-d electric field measur- ing technique and its experimental verification,

    R. Shimizu, M. Matsuoka, K. Kato, N. Hayakawa, M. Hikita, and H. Okubo, “Development of kerr electro-optic 3-d electric field measur- ing technique and its experimental verification,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 1996

    1996

  10. [10]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , author=

    Z. Q. Qiu and S. D. Bader, “Surface magneto-optic kerr effect,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1243–1255, 03 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1150496

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1150496 2000

  11. [11]

    A review of three-dimensional electric field sensors,

    X. Li, Y . Gu, Z. Li, Z. He, P. Yang, and C. Peng, “A review of three-dimensional electric field sensors,” Micromachines, vol. 16, no. 7,

  12. [12]

    Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/16/7/737

    [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/16/7/737

    2072

  13. [13]

    Development and application of integrated optical sensors for intense e-field measurement,

    R. Zeng, B. Wang, B. Niu, and Z. Yu, “Development and application of integrated optical sensors for intense e-field measurement,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 11 406–11 434, 2012. [Online]. Available: https: //www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/8/11406

    2012

  14. [14]

    An overview of optical voltage sensor based on pockels effect,

    L. J. Li, W. H. Zhang, H. Li, and R. Pan, “An overview of optical voltage sensor based on pockels effect,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 694, pp. 987–991, 2013

    2013

  15. [15]

    Tzelepis, V

    D. Tzelepis, V . Psaras, E. Tsotsopoulou, S. Mirsaeidi, A. Dy´sko, Q. Hong, X. Dong, S. M. Blair, V . C. Nikolaidis, V . Papaspiliotopoulos, G. Fusiek, G. M. Burt, P. Niewczas, and C. D. Booth, “V oltage and current measuring technologies for high voltage direct current supergrids: A technology review identifying the options for protection, fault location...

    2020

  16. [16]

    Degen, F

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, “Quantum sensing,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 89, p. 035002, Jul 2017. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 2017

  17. [17]

    Advances in photonic quantum sensing,

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, “Advances in photonic quantum sensing,” Nature Photonics, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 724–733, Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s41566-018-0301-6

    2018

  18. [18]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Advances in quantum metrology,” Nature Photonics, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 222–229, Mar. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.35

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 2011

  19. [19]

    Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules,

    A. D. Cronin, J. Schmiedmayer, and D. E. Pritchard, “Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 81, pp. 1051–1129, Jul 2009. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.81.1051

    2009

  20. [20]

    Optical magnetometry,

    D. Budker and M. Romalis, “Optical magnetometry,” Nature Physics, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 227–234, Apr. 2007. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys566

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys566 2007

  21. [21]

    High- sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution,

    J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Childress, L. Jiang, D. Budker, P. R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, R. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, “High- sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution,” Nature Physics, vol. 4, no. 10, p. 810–816, Sep. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys1075

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1075 2008

  22. [22]

    Kitching, Applied Physics Reviews5, 10.1063/1.5026238 (2018)

    J. Kitching, “Chip-scale atomic devices,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 031302, 08 2018. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.5026238 14 VOLUME 4, 2016

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5026238 2018

  23. [23]

    A giant electro-optic effect using polarizable dark states,

    A. K. Mohapatra, M. G. Bason, B. Butscher, K. J. Weatherill, and C. S. Adams, “A giant electro-optic effect using polarizable dark states,” Nature Physics, vol. 4, no. 11, p. 890–894, Sep. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys1091

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1091 2008

  24. [24]

    Microwave electrometry with rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances,

    J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kübler, R. Löw, T. Pfau, and J. P. Shaffer, “Microwave electrometry with rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances,” Nature Physics, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 819– 824, Sep. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys2423

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2423 2012

  25. [25]

    Rydberg-atom based radio-frequency electrometry using frequency modulation spectroscopy in room temperature vapor cells,

    S. Kumar, H. Fan, H. Kübler, A. J. Jahangiri, and J. P. Shaffer, “Rydberg-atom based radio-frequency electrometry using frequency modulation spectroscopy in room temperature vapor cells,” Optics Express, vol. 25, no. 8, p. 8625, Apr. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.008625

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.25.008625 2017

  26. [26]

    Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed rydberg spectroscopy,

    M. Jing, Y . Hu, J. Ma, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, “Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed rydberg spectroscopy,” Nature Physics, vol. 16, no. 9, p. 911–915, Jun. 2020. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0918-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0918-5 2020

  27. [27]

    Quantum scaling atomic superheterodyne receiver,

    P. Zhang, M. Jing, Z. Wang, Y . Peng, S. Yuan, H. Zhang, L. Xiao, S. Jia, and L. Zhang, “Quantum scaling atomic superheterodyne receiver,” EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-023-00198-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-023-00198-7 2023

  28. [28]

    Linear dynamic range of a rydberg-atom microwave superheterodyne receiver,

    F. Wu, Q. An, Z. Sun, and Y . Fu, “Linear dynamic range of a rydberg-atom microwave superheterodyne receiver,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 107, p. 043108, Apr 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.043108

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.043108 2023

  29. [29]

    Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system,

    D.-S. Ding, Z.-K. Liu, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, K. Mølmer, and C. S. Adams, “Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system,” Nature Physics, vol. 18, no. 12, p. 1447–1452, Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01777-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01777-8 2022

  30. [30]

    Deep learning enhanced rydberg multifrequency microwave recognition,

    Z.-K. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, B. Liu, Z.-Y . Zhang, G.-C. Guo, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, “Deep learning enhanced rydberg multifrequency microwave recognition,” Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29686-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29686-7 2022

  31. [31]

    Cavity-linewidth narrowing by means of electromagnetically induced transparency,

    H. Wang, D. J. Goorskey, W. H. Burkett, and M. Xiao, “Cavity-linewidth narrowing by means of electromagnetically induced transparency,” Optics Letters, vol. 25, no. 23, p. 1732, Dec. 2000. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.25.001732

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.25.001732 2000

  32. [32]

    Cavity-enhanced rydberg atomic superheterodyne receiver,

    Y . Liang, Q. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Guan, P. Yang, Y . Zhang, J. He, P. Zhang, G. Li, and T. Zhang, “Cavity-enhanced rydberg atomic superheterodyne receiver,” Optics Express, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 13034, Mar. 2025. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.552016

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.552016 2025

  33. [33]

    Cavity-enhanced microwave electric field measurement using rydberg atoms,

    Y . Peng, J. Wang, A. Yang, Z. Jia, D. Li, and B. Chen, “Cavity-enhanced microwave electric field measurement using rydberg atoms,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 35, no. 9, p. 2272, Aug. 2018. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.35.002272

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.35.002272 2018

  34. [34]

    Cavity-enhanced rydberg atom microwave receiver,

    B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Q.-F. Wang, Y . Ma, T.-Y . Han, Z.-K. Liu, Z.-Y . Zhang, S.-Y . Shao, J. Zhang, Q. Li, H.-C. Chen, Y .-L. Han, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, “Cavity-enhanced rydberg atom microwave receiver,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 42, no. 5, p. 053201, May 2025. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/42/5/053201

    work page doi:10.1088/0256-307x/42/5/053201 2025

  35. [35]

    Observation of electromagnetically induced transparency,

    K.-J. Boller, A. Imamo ˘glu, and S. E. Harris, “Observation of electromagnetically induced transparency,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 66, pp. 2593–2596, May 1991. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.66.2593

    1991

  36. [36]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency,

    J. P. Marangos, “Electromagnetically induced transparency,” Journal of modern optics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 471–503, 1998

    1998

  37. [37]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media,

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, “Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 77, pp. 633–673, Jul 2005. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.633

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.633 2005

  38. [38]

    Enhancing sensitivity of an atomic microwave receiver via a fabry-perot cavity,

    B. Wu, D. Liao, D. Sang, Y . Liu, and Y . Fu, “Enhancing sensitivity of an atomic microwave receiver via a fabry-perot cavity,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 863–872, 2025

    2025

  39. [39]

    Shortwave ultrahigh- sensitivity rydberg atomic electric field sensing based on a subminiature resonator,

    R. Mao, Y . Lin, A. Zhou, K. Yang, and Y . Fu, “Shortwave ultrahigh- sensitivity rydberg atomic electric field sensing based on a subminiature resonator,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 8165–8172, 2024

    2024

  40. [40]

    Dc and power- frequency electric field measurement with rydberg-atom interferometry,

    Y . Han, C. He, Z. Weng, P. Xu, Y . Zhao, and T. Wang, “Dc and power- frequency electric field measurement with rydberg-atom interferometry,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 127, no. 2, p. 024002, 07 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0272159

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0272159 2025

  41. [41]

    Theoretical study on stark effect of rydberg atom in super low frequency electric field measurement,

    H. Song, Y . Xiao, S. Hu, D. Xiao, B. Wang, Z. Shi, and H. Zhang, “Theoretical study on stark effect of rydberg atom in super low frequency electric field measurement,” IET Energy Systems Integration, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 174–181, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1049/esi2.12149

    work page doi:10.1049/esi2.12149 2024

  42. [42]

    Stark modulated rydberg dissipative time crystals at room temperature applied to sub-khz electric field sensing,

    D. Arumugam, “Stark modulated rydberg dissipative time crystals at room temperature applied to sub-khz electric field sensing,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, Oct. 2025. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19859-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19859-x 2025

  43. [43]

    Dc electric fields in electrode-free glass vapor cell by photoillumination,

    L. Ma, E. Paradis, and G. Raithel, “Dc electric fields in electrode-free glass vapor cell by photoillumination,” Optics Express, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 3676, Jan. 2020. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.380748

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.380748 2020

  44. [44]

    High sensitivity measurement of ulf, vlf, and lf fields with a rydberg-atom sensor,

    M. Lei and M. Shi, “High sensitivity measurement of ulf, vlf, and lf fields with a rydberg-atom sensor,” Opt. Lett., vol. 49, no. 19, pp. 5547–5550, Oct 2024. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ol/ abstract.cfm?URI=ol-49-19-5547

    2024

  45. [45]

    Research of 110 kv high-voltage measurement method based on rydberg atoms,

    Y . Diao, Z. Qu, N. Qu, J. Cao, X. Li, X. Xu, and S. You, “Research of 110 kv high-voltage measurement method based on rydberg atoms,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/15/2932

    2025

  46. [46]

    Super low-frequency electric field measurement based on rydberg atoms,

    L. Li, Y . Jiao, J. Hu, H. Li, M. Shi, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, “Super low-frequency electric field measurement based on rydberg atoms,” Opt. Express, vol. 31, no. 18, pp. 29 228–29 234, Aug 2023. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-31-18-29228

    2023

  47. [47]

    Vapor-cell-based atomic electrometry for detection frequencies below 1 khz,

    Y .-Y . Jau and T. Carter, “Vapor-cell-based atomic electrometry for detection frequencies below 1 khz,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 13, p. 054034, May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.13.054034

    2020

  48. [48]

    Enhancing the performance of quantum reser- voir computing and solving the time-complexity prob- lem by artificial memory restriction.Phys

    A. Duspayev, R. Cardman, D. A. Anderson, and G. Raithel, “High- angular-momentum rydberg states in a room-temperature vapor cell for dc electric-field sensing,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 6, p. 023138, May 2024. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6. 023138

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6 2024

  49. [49]

    Dynamic response characteristics of rydberg atoms under the action of electric fields ranging from dc to 50 khz and electric field measurement method,

    S. Yan, D. Xiao, H. Zhang, H. Wang, and F. Pan, “Dynamic response characteristics of rydberg atoms under the action of electric fields ranging from dc to 50 khz and electric field measurement method,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 58, no. 38, p. 385104, Sep. 2025. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ae04f4

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ae04f4 2025

  50. [50]

    Electric field measurement using a three-photon double-dark-state model in rydberg atoms,

    D. Xiao, X. Wei, S. Yan, and H. Zhang, “Electric field measurement using a three-photon double-dark-state model in rydberg atoms,” AIP Advances, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 075108, 07 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0265975

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0265975 2025

  51. [51]

    Low-frequency weak electric field measurement based on rydberg atoms using cavity- enhanced three photon system,

    D. Xiao, Z. Shi, L. Chen, S. Yan, L. Xu, and H. Zhang, “Low-frequency weak electric field measurement based on rydberg atoms using cavity- enhanced three photon system,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 12, Jun. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1405149

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1405149 2024

  52. [52]

    Stark effect in rapidly varying fields,

    S. H. Autler and C. H. Townes, “Stark effect in rapidly varying fields,” Phys. Rev., vol. 100, pp. 703–722, Oct 1955. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.100.703

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.100.703 1955

  53. [53]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency and autler- townes splitting: Two similar but distinct phenomena in two categories of three-level atomic systems,

    T. Y . Abi-Salloum, “Electromagnetically induced transparency and autler- townes splitting: Two similar but distinct phenomena in two categories of three-level atomic systems,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 81, p. 053836, May

  54. [54]

    Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.81

    [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.81. 053836

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.81

  55. [55]

    Observation of the separation of spectral lines by an electric field,

    J. STARK, “Observation of the separation of spectral lines by an electric field,” Nature, vol. 92, no. 2301, p. 401–401, Dec. 1913. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/092401b0

    work page doi:10.1038/092401b0 1913

  56. [56]

    Arc: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali rydberg atoms,

    N. Šibali ´c, J. Pritchard, C. Adams, and K. Weatherill, “Arc: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali rydberg atoms,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 220, pp. 319–331,

  57. [57]

    Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0010465517301972

    [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0010465517301972

  58. [58]

    A tutorial on fisher information,

    A. Ly, M. Marsman, J. Verhagen, R. P. Grasman, and E.-J. Wagenmakers, “A tutorial on fisher information,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 80, pp. 40–55, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0022249617301396

    2017

  59. [59]

    Fisher- based sensitivity framework for rydberg-atom microwave electrometry,

    C.-R. Liu, R. Tao, X. Lv, Y . Dong, C. Li, B. Wei, and M. Zhou, “Fisher- based sensitivity framework for rydberg-atom microwave electrometry,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 25, p. 034052, Mar 2026. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/qsmd-yh44

    work page doi:10.1103/qsmd-yh44 2026

  60. [60]

    Fisher information analysis for quantum-enhanced parameter estimation in an electromagnetically- induced-transparency spectrum with single photons,

    P.-J. Tsai, L.-P. Yuan, and Y .-C. Chen, “Fisher information analysis for quantum-enhanced parameter estimation in an electromagnetically- induced-transparency spectrum with single photons,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 108, p. 033711, Sep 2023. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.108.033711 VOLUME 4, 2016 15 16 VOLUME 4, 2016

    2023