pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16005 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · hep-ex· hep-ph· nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Isospin-symmetry violation -- kaons and beyond (ISO-BREAK 25: summary and outlook)

Marek Gazdzicki (1) , Francesco Giacosa (1) , Katarzyna Grebieszkow (2) , David Blaschke (3) , Marcus Bleicher (4) , Bastian Brandt (5) , Wojciech Brylinski , Tobiasz Czopowicz (6)
show 80 more authors
Jim Drachenberg (7) Dipangkar Dutta (8) Francesca Ercolessi (9) Mark Gorenstein (10) Linqin Huang (11) Oleksii Ivanytskyi (3) Nicolo Jacazio (12) Joseph Kapusta (13) Seweryn Kowalski (14) Maciej Piotr Lewicki (15) Manuel Lorenz (16) Stanislaw Mrowczynski (6) Vitalii Ozvenchuk (15) Oleksandra Panova (1) Roman Planeta (17) Krzysztof Piasecki (18) Milena Piotrowska (1) Rob Pisarski (19) Damian Pszczel (6) Johann Rafelski (20) Martin Rohrmoser (1) Andrzej Rybicki (15) Maciej Rybczynski (1) Radoslaw Ryblewski (15) Subhasis Samanta (21) Mayank Singh (22) Joanna Maria Stepaniak (6) Grzegorz Stefanek (1) Herbert Stroebele (4) Tatjana Susa (23) Leonardo Tinti (1) Ludwik Turko (3) Oleksandr Vitiuk (3) Klaus Werner (24) Hanna Zbroszczyk (2) ((1) Jan Kochanowski University Kielce Poland (2) Warsaw University of Technology Warsaw (3) University of Wroclaw (4) Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Germany (5) University of Bielefeld (6) National Centre for Nuclear Research (7) Abilene Christian University USA (8) Mississippi State University (9) University INFN Bologna Italy (10) Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics Kyiv Ukraine (11) Institute of Modern Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences China (12) University del Piemonte Orientale (13) University of Minnesota (14) University of Silesia (15) Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow (16) GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung Darmstadt (17) Jagiellonian University (18) University of Warsaw (19) Brookhaven National Laboratory (20) University of Arizona Tucson (21) Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology India (22) Vanderbilt University (23) Rudjer Boskovic Institute Zagreb Croatia (24) SUBATECH Nantes University-IN2P3/CNRS-IMT Atlantique Nantes France)
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex hep-exhep-phnucl-th
keywords isospin symmetry violationNA61/SHINEheavy-ion collisionskaon productionCERN SPSparticle production ratiossymmetry breakingnuclear physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

The isospin symmetry violation in particle ratios observed by NA61/SHINE at the CERN SPS remains unexplained.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This report summarizes the ISO-BREAK 25 workshop on isospin symmetry violation in kaons and beyond. It reviews the current status of the breaking effect first seen in nucleus-nucleus collisions at the SPS, along with ongoing confirmation attempts in other experiments and in electron-positron and deep inelastic scattering studies. The document also covers theoretical approaches and lays out the experimental and theoretical priorities needed to explain the phenomenon.

Core claim

The isospin-symmetry breaking discovered by NA61/SHINE in heavy-ion collisions at the CERN SPS, visible as unexpected deviations in particle production ratios, has not been explained by existing theory, and the workshop outlines paths for confirmation and theoretical progress.

What carries the argument

Isospin-symmetry violation manifested in deviations of particle production ratios, especially involving kaons, in nucleus-nucleus collisions.

If this is right

  • Dedicated measurements in additional collision systems and at different energies are required to confirm or refute the effect.
  • Theoretical models of strong interactions must incorporate mechanisms that allow isospin symmetry to be broken in this way.
  • Data from electron-positron annihilation and deep inelastic scattering can provide independent tests of whether the violation is specific to nuclear matter.
  • Clear experimental and theoretical priorities are needed to guide the next steps toward understanding the origin of the breaking.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation would suggest that standard models of QCD in dense environments miss a symmetry-breaking channel.
  • The effect, if real, might be tied to specific conditions in heavy-ion collisions rather than appearing universally.
  • Resolving the question could influence how isospin is treated in predictions of particle yields across different collision types.

Load-bearing premise

The deviation in particle production ratios reported by NA61/SHINE is a genuine isospin symmetry violation rather than an experimental artifact or unaccounted systematic effect.

What would settle it

An independent high-precision experiment measuring the same particle production ratios at comparable energies and showing no deviation would falsify the existence of the reported isospin symmetry violation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16005 by (10) Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, (11) Institute of Modern Physics, (12) University del Piemonte Orientale, (13) University of Minnesota, (14) University of Silesia, (15) Institute of Nuclear Physics, (16) GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung, (17) Jagiellonian University, (18) University of Warsaw, (19) Brookhaven National Laboratory, (20) University of Arizona, (21) Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, (22) Vanderbilt University, (23) Rudjer Boskovic Institute, (24) SUBATECH, (2) Warsaw University of Technology, (3) University of Wroclaw, (4) Goethe University, (5) University of Bielefeld, (6) National Centre for Nuclear Research, (7) Abilene Christian University, (8) Mississippi State University, (9) University INFN, Andrzej Rybicki (15), Bastian Brandt (5), Bologna, China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Croatia, Damian Pszczel (6), Darmstadt, David Blaschke (3), Dipangkar Dutta (8), France), Francesca Ercolessi (9), Francesco Giacosa (1), Frankfurt am Main, Germany, Grzegorz Stefanek (1), Hanna Zbroszczyk (2) ((1) Jan Kochanowski University, Herbert Stroebele (4), India, Italy, Jim Drachenberg (7), Joanna Maria Stepaniak (6), Johann Rafelski (20), Joseph Kapusta (13), Katarzyna Grebieszkow (2), Kielce, Klaus Werner (24), Krakow, Krzysztof Piasecki (18), Kyiv, Leonardo Tinti (1), Linqin Huang (11), Ludwik Turko (3), Maciej Piotr Lewicki (15), Maciej Rybczynski (1), Manuel Lorenz (16), Marcus Bleicher (4), Marek Gazdzicki (1), Mark Gorenstein (10), Martin Rohrmoser (1), Mayank Singh (22), Milena Piotrowska (1), Nantes, Nantes University-IN2P3/CNRS-IMT Atlantique, Nicolo Jacazio (12), Oleksandra Panova (1), Oleksandr Vitiuk (3), Oleksii Ivanytskyi (3), Poland, Polish Academy of Sciences, Radoslaw Ryblewski (15), Rob Pisarski (19), Roman Planeta (17), Seweryn Kowalski (14), Stanislaw Mrowczynski (6), Subhasis Samanta (21), Tatjana Susa (23), Tobiasz Czopowicz (6), Tucson, Ukraine, USA, Vitalii Ozvenchuk (15), Warsaw, Wojciech Brylinski, Zagreb.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ratio of charged to neutral K meson yields (RK = (K + + K −)/2K0 S) in nucleus–nucleus collisions as a function of collision center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair. The black line shows the Hadron Resonance Gas (HRG) model predictions for Q/B = 0.4, where Q/B denotes the electric charge per baryon number of the whole system. The black dots indicate the HRG predictions for Q/B values corresponding to the on… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum (right) spectra of neutral (K0 S) with the averaged spectrum of charged ((K + +K −)/2) kaons in the 10% most central Ar+Sc collisions at 11.9 GeV [1]. Vertical bars denote total uncertainties. The low-energy end of the RK collision-energy dependence is set by measurements at the GSI SIS18. The most relevant point comes from HADES (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ratio of π + to π − yields in central Be+Be [19] and Ar+Sc [20] collisions as a function of collision energy as measured by NA61/SHINE. For comparison, results from the strongly charge-asymmetric p+p [21] interactions are also shown. Vertical bars denote total uncertainties. Ni+Ni 1.93A GeV Ru+Ru/Zr 1.69A GeV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results on charged and neutral kaon yields as a function of rapidity in nucleus–nucleus collisions from FOPI and KaoS at the GSI SIS18. Note that at these low collision energies, the K − yield is negligible. The plots are taken from Ref. [22] and presented in Ref. [24]. Finally, the very high-energy end of the RK collision-energy dependence is provided by measurements from ALICE at the CERN LHC [26, 27, 28… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Comparison of transverse momentum spectra of K0 S and K + mesons in inelastic p+p interactions at 0.9 TeV [29]. Right: The RK ratio in p+p, p+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at LHC energies as measured by ALICE. The plots are taken from Ref. [28]; the right one with later changes. 2.2 e ++e − interactions and deep e −+D inelastic scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized differential cross sections of charged and neutral pions (top) and kaons (bottom) as a function of hadron momentum in e ++e − interactions at 3.050 and 3.671 GeV. Vertical bars denote total uncertainties. The green and red bands denote the “NPC” (Nonperturbative Physics Collaboration) NNLO calculations [30, 31] with 1σ limits, based on a new global fit including world data [30] and the new BESII… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Compilation of world data on the charged-to-neutral kaon ratio in e ++e − interactions. The plot is taken from Ref. [32] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The z (pion’s longitudinal momentum fraction) dependence of the charge-symmetry-violating parameter δCSV for the favored (dominant) fragmentation function (top panels) and the unfavored (subdominant) fragmentation function (bottom panels), extracted from measured charged pion multiplicities on hydrogen and deuterium targets. The panels are ordered in decreasing x (increasing W). Here x, W, and Q 2 denote t… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Compilation of model predictions for RK in nucleus–nucleus collisions in the range √ sNN = 10–20 GeV. The world data average includes all data points for √ sNN ≥ 2.6 GeV as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The magnetic field in heavy-ion collisions as a function of impact parameter and collision energy at time of hadroniza￾tion, the result courtesy of Chris Grayson, see also Ref. [111]. range available for exploration by the NA61/SHINE Collaboration. While our theory may evolve further, the possible appearance of a magnetic peak with a significant magnetic field across both impact parameter and collision en… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Three production processes of qq pair. The same result, although obtained in a slightly different context, is also called the Sommerfeld amplification factor, the Gamow factor, or the Fermi correction. The factor equals [115] Γ(p) ≡ |ψp(r = 0)| 2 = ± 2π aBp 1 exp ± 2π aBp  − 1 , (4) where the sign plus (minus) is for the repulsive (attractive) Coulomb interaction, p is the relative momentum of the partic… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left: The Gamow factors of dd pair in the singlet and octet state as a function of relative momentum. Right: The ratios of Gamow factors of uu and dd quark pairs in the singlet and octet states as a function of relative momentum. The plots are taken from Ref. [88]. where q is the quark electric charge in units of the fractional elementary charges (q = 2/3 for u quarks and q = −1/3 for d quarks), αem = 1/1… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This report summarizes the presentations and discussions during the ISO-BREAK 25 Workshop ``Isospin symmetry violation: kaons and beyond'', which was held at Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce on October 23-25, 2025. We address the current status of the isospin-symmetry breaking discovered by NA61/SHINE in nucleus-nucleus collisions at the CERN SPS, its confirmation by other experiments and studies in \ee and deep inelastic scattering. In addition, we discuss the theoretical status as well as we outline experimental and theoretical priorities towards understanding this currently unexplained phenomenon.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. This manuscript summarizes the presentations and discussions from the ISO-BREAK 25 workshop on isospin symmetry violation held at Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce on October 23-25, 2025. It reports the current status of the isospin-symmetry breaking discovered by NA61/SHINE in nucleus-nucleus collisions at the CERN SPS, efforts toward confirmation by other experiments and in e+e- and deep inelastic scattering, the theoretical status, and experimental and theoretical priorities for resolving this unexplained phenomenon.

Significance. As a workshop summary, the report documents an open experimental puzzle in nuclear physics whose resolution could affect understanding of isospin symmetry in QCD and hadronic interactions. It is useful for recording community consensus on the NA61/SHINE observation and for outlining next steps, though it introduces no new data, derivations, or machine-checked results itself.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review of our workshop summary and for the positive recommendation to accept the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in workshop summary report

full rationale

This document is a workshop summary report that compiles presentations, discussions, and priorities regarding an open experimental puzzle (isospin-symmetry breaking reported by NA61/SHINE). It contains no original derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or theoretical constructions that could reduce to self-referential inputs by construction. All references to data, confirmations, or theoretical status point to external experiments and prior literature without any internal prediction or uniqueness claim that depends on the paper's own content. The central claim is simply that the phenomenon remains unexplained, which is a factual status update rather than a derived result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The summary rests on the validity of prior experimental claims and standard concepts in nuclear physics without introducing new fitted parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Isospin symmetry is an approximate symmetry of the strong interaction that can be violated in certain environments
    Invoked throughout the discussion of the observed breaking.
  • domain assumption The NA61/SHINE observation constitutes a genuine isospin symmetry violation
    Taken as the starting point for the workshop summary.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5973 in / 1303 out tokens · 60500 ms · 2026-05-10T07:22:25.367353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Overview of results from NA61/SHINE

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    NA61/SHINE reports a subjective summary of particle production and related measurements in the intermediate-energy regime bridging LHC and FAIR heavy-ion experiments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Evidence of isospin-symmetry violation in high-energy collisions of atomic nuclei

    H. Adhikary et al. “Evidence of isospin-symmetry violation in high-energy collisions of atomic nuclei”.Nature Commun.16.1 (2025), 2849.doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57234-6. arXiv:2312.06572 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57234-6 2025

  2. [2]

    Evidence of isospin-symmetry violation in high-energy collisions of atomic nuclei: Theoret- ical and phenomenological considerations

    W. Brylinski et al. “Evidence of isospin-symmetry violation in high-energy collisions of atomic nuclei: Theoret- ical and phenomenological considerations” (2023). arXiv:2312.07176 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Single Inclusiveπ± andK ± Production ine +e− Annihilation at Center-of-Mass Energies from 2.000 to 3.671 GeV

    M. Ablikim et al. “Single Inclusiveπ± andK ± Production ine +e− Annihilation at Center-of-Mass Energies from 2.000 to 3.671 GeV”.Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025), 151901.doi:10.1103/5kxw-3mbw. arXiv:2502.16084 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/5kxw-3mbw 2025

  4. [4]

    Flavor dependence of charged pion fragmentation functions

    H. Bhatt et al. “Flavor dependence of charged pion fragmentation functions”.Phys. Lett. B865 (2025), 139485. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139485. arXiv:2408.16640 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139485 2025

  5. [5]

    News on strangeness production from the NA61/SHINE experiment

    Y. Balkova and T. Šuša. “News on strangeness production from the NA61/SHINE experiment” (2025). arXiv: 2508.14998 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Centrality Dependence of Neutral Pion Production in 158AGeV 208Pb + 208Pb Collisions

    M. M. Aggarwal et al. “Centrality Dependence of Neutral Pion Production in 158AGeV 208Pb + 208Pb Collisions”.Phys. Rev. Lett.81 (1998). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 84, 578–579 (2000)], 4087–4091.doi:10 . 1103/PhysRevLett.81.4087. arXiv:nucl-ex/9806004

    work page arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    Neutral pion production with respect to centrality and reaction plane in Au+Au collisions at √sN N=200 GeV

    A. Adare et al. “Neutral pion production with respect to centrality and reaction plane in Au+Au collisions at √sN N=200 GeV”.Phys. Rev. C87.3 (2013), 034911.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034911. arXiv:1208.2254 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.034911 2013

  8. [8]

    Neutral pion andηmeson production in proton–proton collisions at √s= 0.9TeV and √s= 7TeV

    B. Abelev et al. “Neutral pion andηmeson production in proton–proton collisions at √s= 0.9TeV and √s= 7TeV”.Phys. Lett. B717 (2012), 162–172.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.09.015. arXiv:1205.5724 [hep-ex]. M. Gazdzicki, F. Giacosa, K. Grebieszkow, et al.: Isospin-symmetry violation – kaons and beyond 25

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.09.015 2012

  9. [9]

    Neutral pion andηmeson production at midrapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV

    S. Acharya et al. “Neutral pion andηmeson production at midrapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV”.Phys. Rev. C98.4 (2018), 044901.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044901. arXiv:1803.05490 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.044901 2018

  10. [11]

    Pion and kaon production in central Pb+Pb collisions at 20Aand 30AGeV: Evidence for the onset of deconfinement

    C. Alt et al. “Pion and kaon production in central Pb+Pb collisions at 20Aand 30AGeV: Evidence for the onset of deconfinement”.Phys. Rev. C77 (2008), 024903.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024903. arXiv:0710.0118 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.77.024903 2008

  11. [12]

    Energy dependence of pion and kaon production in central Pb+Pb collisions

    S. V. Afanasiev et al. “Energy dependence of pion and kaon production in central Pb+Pb collisions”.Phys. Rev. C66 (2002), 054902.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.054902. arXiv:nucl-ex/0205002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.66.054902 2002

  12. [13]

    Strangeness measurements in NA49 experiment with Pb projectiles

    S. Margetis et al. “Strangeness measurements in NA49 experiment with Pb projectiles”.J. Phys. G25 (1999), 189–197.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/2/006

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/2/006 1999

  13. [14]

    Measurements ofΛ,ΛandK 0 S from Pb-Pb Collisions at 158 GeV per nucleon in a Large Ac- ceptance Experiment

    L. S. Barnby. “Measurements ofΛ,ΛandK 0 S from Pb-Pb Collisions at 158 GeV per nucleon in a Large Ac- ceptance Experiment”. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham. 1999.url:https://edms.cern.ch/document/ 816018/1

    1999

  14. [15]

    ΛundΛProduktion in zentralen Blei-Blei-Kollisionen bei 40, 80 und 158 GeV pro Nukleon

    A. Mischke. “ΛundΛProduktion in zentralen Blei-Blei-Kollisionen bei 40, 80 und 158 GeV pro Nukleon”. PhD thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität. 2002.url:https://edms.cern.ch/document/3409580/1

    work page arXiv 2002

  15. [16]

    Energieabhängigkeit der K0 S-Produktion in zentralen Pb+Pb Reaktionen

    C. Strabel. “Energieabhängigkeit der K0 S-Produktion in zentralen Pb+Pb Reaktionen”. Diploma thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität. 2006.url:https://edms.cern.ch/document/2958534/1

    work page arXiv 2006

  16. [17]

    Zentralitätsabhängigkeit derK0 S-Produktion in relativistischen Schwerionenkollisionen

    J. Book. “Zentralitätsabhängigkeit derK0 S-Produktion in relativistischen Schwerionenkollisionen”. Diploma the- sis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität. 2009.url:https://edms.cern.ch/document/3409578/1

    work page arXiv 2009

  17. [20]

    Measurements ofπ±,K ±,pand¯pspectra in 40Ar+45Sc collisions at 13Ato 150AGeV/c

    H. Adhikary et al. “Measurements ofπ±,K ±,pand¯pspectra in 40Ar+45Sc collisions at 13Ato 150AGeV/c”. Eur. Phys. J. C84.4 (2024), 416.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12602-2. arXiv:2308.16683 [nucl-ex]. 26 M. Gazdzicki, F. Giacosa, K. Grebieszkow, et al.: Isospin-symmetry violation – kaons and beyond

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12602-2 2024

  18. [21]

    Measurements ofπ± , K±, p and¯p spectra in proton-proton interactions at 20, 31, 40, 80 and 158 GeV/cwith the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS

    A. Aduszkiewicz et al. “Measurements ofπ± , K±, p and¯p spectra in proton-proton interactions at 20, 31, 40, 80 and 158 GeV/cwith the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS”.Eur. Phys. J. C77.10 (2017), 671. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5260-4. arXiv:1705.02467 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5260-4 2017

  19. [22]

    Untersuchungen der In-Medium-Eigenschaften vonK0 S-Mesonen undΛ-Hyperonen an der Pro- duktionsschwelle

    R. Kutsche. “Untersuchungen der In-Medium-Eigenschaften vonK0 S-Mesonen undΛ-Hyperonen an der Pro- duktionsschwelle”. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt. 1999.url:https://tuprints.ulb.tu- darmstadt.de/entities/publication/1785882c-7b10-419f-8cc0-861d14893396

    work page arXiv 1999

  20. [23]

    Production ofK+ and ofK − mesons in heavy-ion collisions from 0.6Ato 2.0AGeV incident energy

    A. Förster et al. “Production ofK+ and ofK − mesons in heavy-ion collisions from 0.6Ato 2.0AGeV incident energy”.Phys. Rev. C75 (2007), 024906.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.024906. arXiv:nucl-ex/0701014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.75.024906 2007

  21. [26]

    Abelev, et al., Centrality dependence ofπ, K, p production in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys

    B. Abelev et al. “Centrality dependence ofπ,K, andpproduction in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV”. Phys. Rev. C88 (2013), 044910.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044910. arXiv:1303.0737 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.044910 2013

  22. [27]

    K0 S andΛProduction in Pb-Pb Collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV

    B. Abelev et al. “K0 S andΛProduction in Pb-Pb Collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV”.Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013), 222301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.222301. arXiv:1307.5530 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.222301 2013

  23. [29]

    On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector

    K. Aamodt et al. “Strange particle production in proton–proton collisions at√s= 0.9 TeV with ALICE at the LHC”.Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011), 1594.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 011- 1594- 5. arXiv:1012.3257 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2011

  24. [30]

    Global analysis of fragmentation functions to charged hadrons with high-precision data from the LHC

    J. Gao et al. “Global analysis of fragmentation functions to charged hadrons with high-precision data from the LHC”.Phys. Rev. D110.11 (2024), 114019.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.114019. arXiv:2407.04422 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.114019 2024

  25. [31]

    Simultaneous Determination of Fragmentation Functions and Test on Momentum Sum Rule

    J. Gao et al. “Simultaneous Determination of Fragmentation Functions and Test on Momentum Sum Rule”. Phys. Rev. Lett.132.26(2024),261903.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.261903.arXiv:2401.02781 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.261903.arxiv:2401.02781 2024

  26. [33]

    Flavor Dependence of Charged Pion Fragmentation Functions

    D. Dutta. “Flavor Dependence of Charged Pion Fragmentation Functions”.Workshop on isospin symmetry violation: kaons and beyond – ISO-BREAK 25. 2025.url:https : / / indico . cern . ch / event / 1557894 / contributions/6698146

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [37]

    Modelling relativistic heavy-ion collisions with dynamical transport ap- proaches

    M. Bleicher and E. Bratkovskaya. “Modelling relativistic heavy-ion collisions with dynamical transport ap- proaches”.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.122 (2022), 103920.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103920

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103920 2022

  28. [38]

    Bleicher, et al., Relativistic hadron hadron colli- sions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynam- ics model, J

    M. Bleicher et al. “Relativistic hadron-hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model”.J. Phys. G25 (1999), 1859–1896.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308. arXiv:hep-ph/9909407

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 1999

  29. [39]

    Parton–Hadron-String Dynamics at relativistic collider energies

    E. L. Bratkovskaya et al. “Parton–Hadron-String Dynamics at relativistic collider energies”.Nucl. Phys. A856 (2011), 162–182.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.03.003. arXiv:1101.5793 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.03.003 2011

  30. [40]

    Value ofRK in PHSD

    V. Ozvenchuk. “Value ofRK in PHSD”.Private Communication. 2025

    2025

  31. [41]

    Particle production and equilibrium properties within a new hadron transport approach for heavy- ion collisions

    J. Weil et al. “Particle production and equilibrium properties within a new hadron transport approach for heavy- ion collisions”.Phys. Rev. C94.5 (2016), 054905.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054905. arXiv:1606.06642 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.054905 2016

  32. [43]

    EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

    T. Pierog et al. “EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider”.Phys. Rev. C92.3 (2015), 034906.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034906. arXiv:1306.0121 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.034906 2015

  33. [45]

    On particle production for high energy neutrino beams

    M. Bonesini et al. “On particle production for high energy neutrino beams”.Eur. Phys. J. C20 (2001), 13–27. doi:10.1007/s100520100656. arXiv:hep-ph/0101163. 28 M. Gazdzicki, F. Giacosa, K. Grebieszkow, et al.: Isospin-symmetry violation – kaons and beyond

    work page doi:10.1007/s100520100656 2001

  34. [46]

    On the relation betweenK0 s and charged kaon yields in proton–proton collisions

    J. Stepaniak and D. Pszczel. “On the relation betweenK0 s and charged kaon yields in proton–proton collisions”. Eur. Phys. J. C83.10 (2023), 928.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12108-3. arXiv:2305.03872 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12108-3 2023

  35. [47]

    Value ofRK in QC approach without isospin breaking

    M. Rohrmoser. “Value ofRK in QC approach without isospin breaking”.Private Communication. 2026

    2026

  36. [48]

    Isospin kaon anomaly and its consequences

    F. Giacosa and M. Rohrmoser. “Isospin kaon anomaly and its consequences”.Eur. Phys. J. C85.9 (2025), 1058. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14798-3. arXiv:2504.02113 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14798-3 2025

  37. [50]

    Computational Strategies in Lattice QCD

    M. Lüscher. “Computational Strategies in Lattice QCD”.Les Houches Summer School: Session 93: Modern perspectives in lattice QCD: Quantum field theory and high performance computing. Feb. 2010, 331–399. arXiv: 1002.4232 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2010

  38. [51]

    The QCD equation of state from the lattice

    O. Philipsen. “The QCD equation of state from the lattice”.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.70 (2013), 55–107.doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.09.003. arXiv:1207.5999 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.09.003 2013

  39. [52]

    Lattice calculation of the pion mass differenceMπ+ −M π0 at orderO(α em)

    R. Frezzotti et al. “Lattice calculation of the pion mass differenceMπ+ −M π0 at orderO(α em)”.Phys. Rev. D 106.1 (2022), 014502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014502. arXiv:2202.11970 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.014502 2022

  40. [53]

    Isospin breaking effects due to the up-down mass difference in lattice QCD

    G. M. de Divitiis et al. “Isospin breaking effects due to the up-down mass difference in lattice QCD”.JHEP04 (2012), 124.doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2012)124. arXiv:1110.6294 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2012)124 2012

  41. [54]

    Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference

    S. Borsanyi et al. “Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference”.Science347 (2015), 1452–1455. doi:10.1126/science.1257050. arXiv:1406.4088 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1257050 2015

  42. [55]

    Leading isospin-breaking corrections to pion, kaon, and charmed-meson masses with twisted- mass fermions

    D. Giusti et al. “Leading isospin-breaking corrections to pion, kaon, and charmed-meson masses with twisted- mass fermions”.Phys. Rev. D95.11 (2017), 114504.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.114504. arXiv:1704.06561 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.114504 2017

  43. [56]

    Aoki et al., FLAG review 2024, Phys

    Y. Aoki et al. “FLAG review 2024”.Phys. Rev. D113.1 (2026), 014508.doi:10.1103 /nfzp- p5dn. arXiv: 2411.04268 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [57]

    Phase transition in QCD with brokenSU(2)flavor symmetry

    R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta. “Phase transition in QCD with brokenSU(2)flavor symmetry”.Phys. Rev. D66 (2002), 094510.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.094510. arXiv:hep-lat/0208019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.094510 2002

  45. [59]

    Explanation of the observed violation of isospin symmetry in relativistic nucleus-nucleus reactions

    T. Reichert, J. Steinheimer, and M. Bleicher. “Explanation of the observed violation of isospin symmetry in relativistic nucleus-nucleus reactions”.Phys. Lett. B873 (2026), 140170.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026. 140170. arXiv:2503.10493 [nucl-th]. M. Gazdzicki, F. Giacosa, K. Grebieszkow, et al.: Isospin-symmetry violation – kaons and beyond 29

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026 2026

  46. [60]

    Bierlich, et al., SciPost Phys

    C. Bierlich et al. “A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3”.SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022 (2022), 8.doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8. arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.8 2022

  47. [61]

    Hadron production and quark-gluon plasma hadronization in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV

    M. Petráň et al. “Hadron production and quark-gluon plasma hadronization in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV”.Phys. Rev. C88.3 (2013), 034907.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034907. arXiv:1303.2098 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.034907 2013

  48. [62]

    Universal QGP Hadronization Conditions at RHIC and LHC

    J. Rafelski and M. Petráň. “Universal QGP Hadronization Conditions at RHIC and LHC”.EPJ Web Conf. 78 (2014). Ed. by S. Varró and P. Ádám, 06004.doi:10 . 1051 / epjconf / 20147806004. arXiv:1406 . 1871 [nucl-th]

    2014

  49. [63]

    QCD Phase Transition Studied by Means of Hadron Production

    J. Rafelski and M. Petran. “QCD Phase Transition Studied by Means of Hadron Production”.Phys. Part. Nucl. 46.5 (2015), 748–755.doi:10.1134/S1063779615050238. arXiv:2212.13302 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063779615050238 2015

  50. [64]

    SHARE: Statistical hadronization with resonances

    G. Torrieri et al. “SHARE: Statistical hadronization with resonances”.Comput. Phys. Commun.167 (2005), 229–251.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2005.01.004. arXiv:nucl-th/0404083

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2005.01.004 2005

  51. [65]

    SHAREv2: Fluctuations and a comprehensive treatment of decay feed-down

    G. Torrieri et al. “SHAREv2: Fluctuations and a comprehensive treatment of decay feed-down”.Comput. Phys. Commun.175 (2006), 635–649.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.010. arXiv:nucl-th/0603026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.010 2006

  52. [66]

    Turner, J

    M. Petran et al. “SHARE with CHARM”.Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014), 2056–2079.doi:10.1016/j. cpc.2014.02.026. arXiv:1310.5108 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2014

  53. [67]

    Implementing isospin breaking within THERMINATOR

    R. Ryblewski. “Implementing isospin breaking within THERMINATOR”.Workshop on isospin symmetry vi- olation: kaons and beyond – ISO-BREAK 25. 2025.url:https : / / indico . cern . ch / event / 1557894 / contributions/6698189

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [68]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. “Review of Particle Physics”.Phys. Rev. D110.3 (2024), 030001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110. 030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110 2024

  55. [69]

    Nonlinear selection rules due to isospin symmetry

    L. Turko. “Nonlinear selection rules due to isospin symmetry”.Workshop on isospin symmetry violation: kaons and beyond – ISO-BREAK 25. 2025.url:https : / / indico . cern . ch / event / 1557894 / contributions / 6754662

    2025

  56. [70]

    Thoughts on isospin

    L. Tinti. “Thoughts on isospin”.Workshop on isospin symmetry violation: kaons and beyond – ISO-BREAK

  57. [72]

    Trends of Neutron Skins and Radii of Mirror Nuclei from First Principles

    S. J. Novario et al. “Trends of Neutron Skins and Radii of Mirror Nuclei from First Principles”.Phys. Rev. Lett. 130.3 (2023), 032501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.032501. arXiv:2111.12775 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.032501 2023

  58. [73]

    More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

    D. Kharzeev. “Can gluons trace baryon number?”Phys. Lett. B378 (1996), 238–246.doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(96)00435-2. arXiv:nucl-th/9602027. 30 M. Gazdzicki, F. Giacosa, K. Grebieszkow, et al.: Isospin-symmetry violation – kaons and beyond

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1996

  59. [74]

    Unveiling Baryon Charge Carriers through Charge Stopping in Isobar Collisions

    G. Pihan et al. “Unveiling Baryon Charge Carriers through Charge Stopping in Isobar Collisions”.Phys. Rev. Lett.133.18 (2024), 182301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.182301. arXiv:2405.19439 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.182301 2024

  60. [75]

    The asymmetry of antimatter in the proton

    J. Dove et al. “The asymmetry of antimatter in the proton”.Nature590.7847 (2021). [Erratum: Nature 604, E26 (2022)], 561–565.doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04707-z. arXiv:2103.04024 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04707-z 2021

  61. [76]

    The sea of quarks and antiquarks in the nucleon

    D. F. Geesaman and P. E. Reimer. “The sea of quarks and antiquarks in the nucleon”.Rept. Prog. Phys.82.4 (2019), 046301.doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab05a7. arXiv:1812.10372 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab05a7 2019

  62. [77]

    Effects of Pauli blocking on pion production in central collisions of neutron-rich nuclei

    N. Ikeno et al. “Effects of Pauli blocking on pion production in central collisions of neutron-rich nuclei”.Phys. Rev. C101.3 (2020), 034607.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034607. arXiv:1910.09173 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.034607 2020

  63. [78]

    R. L. Jaffe. “Exotica”.Phys. Rept.409 (2005), 1–45.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.11.005. arXiv:hep- ph/0409065

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.11.005 2005

  64. [79]

    Diquark induced short-range nucleon-nucleon correlations & the EMC effect

    J. R. West. “Diquark induced short-range nucleon-nucleon correlations & the EMC effect”.Nucl. Phys. A1029 (2023), 122563.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122563. arXiv:2009.06968 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122563 2023

  65. [81]

    Born-Infeld Nonlinear Electromagnetism in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

    W. Price, M. Formanek, and J. Rafelski. “Born-Infeld Nonlinear Electromagnetism in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions”.Acta Phys. Polon. A143 (2023), S87.doi:10.12693/APhysPolA.143.S87. arXiv:2306.07704 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.12693/aphyspola.143.s87 2023

  66. [84]

    Chiral symmetry restoration and dileptons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    R. Rapp and J. Wambach. “Chiral symmetry restoration and dileptons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions”.Adv. Nucl. Phys.25 (2000), 1.doi:10.1007/0-306-47101-9_1. arXiv:hep-ph/9909229

    work page doi:10.1007/0-306-47101-9_1 2000

  67. [85]

    Properties of hadrons in the nuclear medium

    C. M. Ko, V. Koch, and G.-Q. Li. “Properties of hadrons in the nuclear medium”.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 47 (1997), 505–539.doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.47.1.505. arXiv:nucl-th/9702016

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.47.1.505 1997

  68. [86]

    Kaon production in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies

    C. Fuchs. “Kaon production in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies”.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.56 (2006), 1–103.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.07.004. arXiv:nucl-th/0507017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.07.004 2006

  69. [88]

    Quarkyonic picture of isospin QCD

    O. Ivanytskyi. “Quarkyonic picture of isospin QCD”.Phys. Rev. D112.3 (2025), 034001.doi:10.1103/831v- 8mp4. arXiv:2505.07076 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/831v- 2025

  70. [90]

    Light-quark masses and isospin violation

    D. J. Gross, S. B. Treiman, and F. Wilczek. “Light-quark masses and isospin violation”.Phys. Rev. D19 (1979), 2188.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2188

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.2188 1979

  71. [91]

    Remarks on the chiral phase transition in chromodynamics

    R. D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek. “Remarks on the chiral phase transition in chromodynamics”.Phys. Rev. D29 (1984), 338–341.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.29.338

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.29.338 1984

  72. [92]

    Anomalous interactions between mesons with nonzero spin and glueballs

    F. Giacosa, S. Jafarzade, and R. D. Pisarski. “Anomalous interactions between mesons with nonzero spin and glueballs”.Phys. Rev. D109.7 (2024), L071502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L071502. arXiv:2309.00086 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l071502 2024

  73. [94]

    Production of classical pion field in heavy ion high energy collisions

    A. A. Anselm and M. G. Ryskin. “Production of classical pion field in heavy ion high energy collisions”.Phys. Lett. B266 (1991), 482–484.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91073-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91073-5 1991

  74. [95]

    Soft-pion emission in high-energy heavy-ion collisions

    J.-P. Blaizot and A. Krzywicki. “Soft-pion emission in high-energy heavy-ion collisions”.Phys. Rev. D46 (1992), 246–251.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.246

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.246 1992

  75. [96]

    Emergence of coherent long wavelength oscillations after a quench: application to QCD

    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek. “Emergence of coherent long wavelength oscillations after a quench: application to QCD”.Nucl. Phys. B404 (1993), 577–589.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90591-C. arXiv:hep-ph/9303281

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90591-c 1993

  76. [97]

    Observing disoriented chiral condensates

    J. D. Bjorken, K. L. Kowalski, and C. C. Taylor. “Observing disoriented chiral condensates” (1993). arXiv: hep-ph/9309235

    work page arXiv 1993

  77. [98]

    Disoriented chiral condensate dynamics with the SU(3) linear sigma model

    J. Schaffner-Bielich and J. Randrup. “Disoriented chiral condensate dynamics with the SU(3) linear sigma model”.Phys. Rev. C59 (1999), 3329–3342.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.59.3329. arXiv:nucl-th/9812032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.59.3329 1999

  78. [99]

    Kaon and pion fluctuations from small disoriented chiral condensates

    S. Gavin and J. I. Kapusta. “Kaon and pion fluctuations from small disoriented chiral condensates”.Phys. Rev. C65 (2002), 054910.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.054910. arXiv:nucl-th/0112083

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.65.054910 2002

  79. [100]

    Neutral to charged kaon yield fluctuations in Pb – Pb collisions at√sNN =2.76 TeV

    S. Acharya et al. “Neutral to charged kaon yield fluctuations in Pb – Pb collisions at√sNN =2.76 TeV”.Phys. Lett. B832 (2022), 137242.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137242. arXiv:2112.09482 [nucl-ex]. 32 M. Gazdzicki, F. Giacosa, K. Grebieszkow, et al.: Isospin-symmetry violation – kaons and beyond

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137242 2022

  80. [101]

    Confronting anomalous kaon correlations measured in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76TeV

    J. I. Kapusta, S. Pratt, and M. Singh. “Confronting anomalous kaon correlations measured in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76TeV”.Phys. Rev. C107.1 (2023), 014913.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevC . 107 . 014913. arXiv: 2210.03257 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.