Recognition: unknown
A Giant Ring on the sky
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:18 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
A giant ring-like structure at redshift 0.8 has been identified in the same sky region as the Giant Arc and Big Ring.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The authors report the discovery of A Giant Ring on the Sky, a ring-like ultra-large-scale structure at redshift approximately 0.8. It was predicted from a Northern Arc filament that could connect with the Giant Arc to form a ring encompassing the Big Ring. There is evidence for two overlapping versions of the GR differing in the left-hand-side trajectory. Statistical assessment with elliptical shells identified two ellipse features above 4 sigma, and 2D Power Spectrum Analysis found 3.5 sigma clustering on scales of about 320 megaparsecs. Tests on random data and FLAMINGO-10K simulations show that while elliptical features can appear by chance, the power spectrum clustering does not appear.
What carries the argument
Optimum elliptical-shell-matching combined with 2D power spectrum analysis applied to galaxy positions to detect ring-like overdensities.
If this is right
- The GR consists of a thin filamentary northern region and a clustered southern region that includes the members of the Giant Arc.
- Branching on the left-hand side of the GR points to multiple overlapping ring features.
- The structure matches both the predicted elliptical form from the Giant Arc plus Northern Arc and a visually nearly circular form enhanced by viewing angle.
- The power spectrum method applied to random and simulated data fields produces no comparable clustering signal.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If the ring is physical it would add to the list of structures whose size approaches the scale at which the universe is expected to look uniform.
- The branching pattern may indicate that rings form within larger filamentary networks rather than as isolated objects.
- Wide-field surveys at similar redshifts could be searched for additional rings to measure how common they are.
Load-bearing premise
The observed galaxy positions trace a single coherent physical ring rather than a chance alignment or projection effect.
What would settle it
An independent galaxy catalog or deeper survey of the same field that shows no elliptical shell matches above four standard deviations and no 320-megaparsec clustering in the power spectrum.
read the original abstract
We present the discovery of `A Giant Ring on the Sky' (GR); a ring-like, ultra-large-scale structure at z~0.8, located in the same field that contains the previously-documented Giant Arc (GA) and Big Ring (BR). The GR was predicted from the presence of a Northern Arc (NA) filament (noted in previous work), which looked like it could, with more or enhanced data, connect with the GA to form a giant ring that encompasses the BR. There is now much evidence to support the reality of a GR. There appear to be two overlapping versions of the GR which differ by only the left-hand-side trajectory; this branching in the LHS of the GR was identified with the FilFinder algorithm and appears to correspond to both the GR prediction (the extended, elliptical, GR from the GA+NA ellipse), and the visually-identified ellipse (the visually-impressive, almost contiguous, roughly circular, GR which is enhanced by a tilted viewing angle). The branching in the GR seems to be hinting at multiple, overlapping ring features. The GR consists of a thin, filamentary northern region, a clustered, ambiguous southern region (including the members of the GA), and filamentary branching towards the LHS. Statistical assessment with elliptical shells, and optimum elliptical-shell-matching, identified two $> 4\sigma$ ellipse features corresponding to the GR prediction and to the visually-identified GR. Additionally, the 2D Power Spectrum Analysis identified significant ($3.5 \sigma$) clustering on scales ~320Mpc. We also applied our statistical assessments to random data and to FLAMINGO-10K simulated data. The results demonstrate that, while superficially `significant' elliptical shells can be reproduced in random data with the optimum ellipse-matching method (many trials giving the `look-elsewhere' effect), with 2D PSA all of the random fields, and FLAMINGO-10K fields, were found to be entirely consistent with random.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper claims the discovery of a Giant Ring (GR), a ring-like ultra-large-scale structure at z~0.8 in the same field as the Giant Arc (GA) and Big Ring (BR). The GR was predicted from the Northern Arc (NA) filament and is supported by FilFinder identification of two overlapping versions, elliptical shell matching yielding two >4σ features, and 2D Power Spectrum Analysis (PSA) showing 3.5σ clustering on ~320 Mpc scales. Comparisons to random fields and FLAMINGO-10K simulations are presented, with the authors noting that the ellipse method can produce superficial significances due to look-elsewhere effects while claiming the PSA results are inconsistent with random.
Significance. If the claimed structure is a genuine physical feature rather than a projection or selection artifact, it would represent a notable detection of ultra-large-scale structure on ~300 Mpc scales, with potential implications for cosmological homogeneity. The multi-method approach including tests on simulations is a positive aspect, as is the explicit acknowledgment of look-elsewhere issues in one test. However, the central >4σ claims rest on a pre-selected field and an optimized ellipse search whose global significance is not quantified.
major comments (3)
- [statistical assessment with elliptical shells] In the statistical assessment with elliptical shells and optimum elliptical-shell-matching: the reported >4σ significances for the two GR ellipse features are presented without correction for the look-elsewhere effect from joint optimization over center, axis ratio, position angle, and radial width. The manuscript notes that the method can yield superficially significant shells in random data due to many trials, but provides no effective number of independent trials, global p-value, or adjusted significance. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the ellipse features support the reality of the GR.
- [2D Power Spectrum Analysis] In the 2D Power Spectrum Analysis section: while the 3.5σ clustering on ~320 Mpc scales is shown to be inconsistent with both random fields and FLAMINGO-10K simulations, this test measures isotropic clustering power and does not specifically validate the closed elliptical or ring geometry. The PSA result therefore provides supporting but not confirmatory evidence for the specific GR structure claimed.
- [introduction and prediction] In the introduction and prediction description: the sky field was chosen around the previously reported GA, BR, and NA, and the GR itself was predicted from the same data. The statistical tests (ellipse matching and PSA) are then applied to this pre-selected region, introducing partial circularity. The comparisons to random fields do not account for this field-selection step, weakening the overall significance assessment.
minor comments (2)
- Details on galaxy catalog completeness, redshift uncertainties, and the precise number of trials performed in the optimum ellipse search are not provided. These should be added to enable full reproducibility and evaluation of possible systematics.
- The distinction between the two overlapping GR versions (predicted elliptical vs. visually-identified) and how the FilFinder branching corresponds to each should be clarified with additional quantitative metrics or figures.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each of the major comments and provide point-by-point responses below. Where appropriate, we indicate revisions that will be incorporated into the next version of the manuscript to strengthen the presentation and address the concerns raised.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: In the statistical assessment with elliptical shells and optimum elliptical-shell-matching: the reported >4σ significances for the two GR ellipse features are presented without correction for the look-elsewhere effect from joint optimization over center, axis ratio, position angle, and radial width. The manuscript notes that the method can yield superficially significant shells in random data due to many trials, but provides no effective number of independent trials, global p-value, or adjusted significance. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the ellipse features support the reality of the GR.
Authors: We note that the manuscript already acknowledges the potential for superficial significances due to the look-elsewhere effect in the elliptical shell method. The two features identified are not from a completely blind search but align with the specific prediction based on the Northern Arc filament and the visual impression of the structure. Nevertheless, to provide a more rigorous assessment, we will revise the manuscript to include an estimate of the effective number of trials by examining the parameter space and the distribution of peak significances in the random realizations. This will allow us to report an adjusted significance level. revision: yes
-
Referee: In the 2D Power Spectrum Analysis section: while the 3.5σ clustering on ~320 Mpc scales is shown to be inconsistent with both random fields and FLAMINGO-10K simulations, this test measures isotropic clustering power and does not specifically validate the closed elliptical or ring geometry. The PSA result therefore provides supporting but not confirmatory evidence for the specific GR structure claimed.
Authors: The 2D Power Spectrum Analysis indeed quantifies the presence of large-scale clustering power without assuming a specific geometry such as a closed ring. We present it as complementary evidence alongside the morphological identification via FilFinder and the elliptical shell matching. In the revised manuscript, we will emphasize that the PSA supports the scale of the structure but that the ring-like morphology is primarily evidenced by the other methods. This clarification will help readers understand the role of each test. revision: yes
-
Referee: In the introduction and prediction description: the sky field was chosen around the previously reported GA, BR, and NA, and the GR itself was predicted from the same data. The statistical tests (ellipse matching and PSA) are then applied to this pre-selected region, introducing partial circularity. The comparisons to random fields do not account for this field-selection step, weakening the overall significance assessment.
Authors: The selection of the field was guided by the locations of the previously identified Giant Arc, Big Ring, and Northern Arc, and the Giant Ring was indeed predicted from the Northern Arc data. This does introduce an element of targeted searching rather than a blind survey. The random field tests show that such features are uncommon in generic fields, providing some context. However, we agree that a full accounting of the selection effects would be ideal. In the revision, we will expand the discussion in the introduction and methods to explicitly describe the prediction and selection process and caution that the reported significances are for this specific field. A comprehensive simulation of the discovery pipeline is beyond the current analysis but represents a direction for future investigation. revision: partial
- A full end-to-end simulation that incorporates the pre-selection of the field based on prior structures and the prediction step to derive a truly global significance.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in derivation chain
full rationale
The paper's claims rest on new statistical tests (optimum elliptical-shell matching yielding >4σ features and 2D PSA yielding 3.5σ clustering) applied to the selected field, with explicit comparisons to random catalogs and FLAMINGO-10K simulations that demonstrate the PSA results are consistent with noise. The initial GR prediction from the prior NA filament is presented as a hypothesis that motivated the analysis, not as an input that is redefined or fitted to produce the reported significances. No equations reduce by construction to prior fits, no parameters are renamed as predictions, and the self-citations to earlier work on GA/BR/NA serve only to locate the field rather than to supply the load-bearing statistical evidence. The paper's own discussion of look-elsewhere effects in the ellipse method further indicates an attempt at external validation rather than self-referential closure.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (2)
- optimum ellipse parameters
- scale of 320 Mpc
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Galaxy positions in the survey trace the underlying matter distribution without significant redshift-space distortions or incompleteness on the relevant scales.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
J.K. Yadav, J.S. Bagla, N. Khandai,Fractal dimension as a measure of the scale of homogeneity,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.405(2010) 2009 [arXiv:1001.0617] 6https://www.R-project.org/ 7https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/SDSS/MgII/ – 41 –
-
[2]
A.M. Lopez, R.G. Clowes and G.M. Williger,A Giant Arc on the sky,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.516(2022) 1557 [arXiv:2201.06875]
-
[3]
A.M. Lopez, R.G. Clowes, G.M. Williger,A Big Ring on the sky,JCAP07(2024) 055 [arXiv:2402.07591]
- [4]
-
[5]
J.R. Gott III, M. Jurić, D. Schlegel, F. Hoyle, M. Vogeley, M. Tegmark, N. Bahcall and J. Brinkmann,A map of the Universe,Astrophys. J.624(2005) 463 [astro-ph/0310571]
-
[6]
Lopez,Assessing the potential of intervening Mg sc II absorbers for cosmology,MSc thesis,Uni
A.M. Lopez,Assessing the potential of intervening Mg sc II absorbers for cosmology,MSc thesis,Uni. Cent. Lanc.(2019)
2019
-
[7]
R.G. Clowes, L.E. Campusano, M.J. Graham and I.K. Söchting,Two close large quasar groups of size∼350 Mpc atz∼1.2,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.419(2012) 556 [arXiv:1108.6221]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
-
[11]
Pilipenko,The space distribution of quasars,Astron
S.V. Pilipenko,The space distribution of quasars,Astron. Rep.51(2007) 820
2007
-
[12]
E.W. Koch and E.W. Rosolosky,Filament identification through mathematical morphology, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452(2015) 3435 [arXiv:1507.02289]
- [13]
-
[14]
Pâris et al.,The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog: twelfth data release,Astron
I. Pâris et al.,The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog: twelfth data release,Astron. Astrophys.597(2017) A79 [arXiv:1608.06483]
- [15]
-
[16]
S. Raghunathan, R.G. Clowes, L. E. Campusano, I. K. Söchting, M. J. Graham and G. M. Williger, emphIntervening Mg II absorption systems from the SDSS DR12 quasar spectra, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.463(2016) 2640 [arXiv:1608.05112]
-
[17]
A.M. Lopez, R.G. Clowes, G.M. Williger,Investigating ultra-large large-scale structures: potential implications for cosmology,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A383(2025) 2290 [arXiv:2409.14894]
- [18]
-
[19]
Peebles,Anomalies in physical cosmology,Ann
P.J.E. Peebles,Anomalies in physical cosmology,Ann. Phys.447(2022) [arXiv:2208.05018]
-
[20]
Binney, R
J. Binney, R. Mohayaee, J. Peacock, S. Sarkar,Manifesto: challenging the standard cosmological model,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A,383(2025) 2290
2025
-
[21]
M.B. Taylor,TOPCAT & STIL: Starlink Table/VOTable Processing Software in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series on Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, Pasadena, California, USA, October 2004 – 42 –
2004
-
[22]
R.G. Clowes, K.A. Harris, S. Raghunathan, L.E. Campusano, I.K. Söchting and M.J. Graham, A structure in the early Universe atz∼1.3that exceeds the homogeneity scale of the R-W concordance cosmology,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.429(2013) 2910 [arXiv:1211.6256]
- [23]
-
[24]
Nadathur,Seeing patterns in noise: gigaparsec ‘structures’ that do not violate homogeneity, Mon
S. Nadathur,Seeing patterns in noise: gigaparsec ‘structures’ that do not violate homogeneity, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.434, (2013) 398 [arXiv:1306.1700]
-
[25]
F. Sylos Labini,Hidden role of anisotropies in shaping structure formation in cosmological N-body simulations,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 2 [arXiv:2508.13765]
-
[26]
Di Valentino, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01525 (2026)
E. Di ValentinoCracks in the standard cosmological model: anomalies, tensions, and hints of new physics(2026) [arXiv:2601.01525]
-
[27]
Webster,The clustering of radio sources — I the theory of power-spectrum analysis,Mon
A.S. Webster,The clustering of radio sources — I the theory of power-spectrum analysis,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.175(1976a) 61
-
[28]
Webster,The clustering of radio sources — II the 4C, GB and MC1 surveys,Mon
A.S. Webster,The clustering of radio sources — II the 4C, GB and MC1 surveys,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.175(1976b) 71
-
[29]
Clowes,Automated quasar detection in the SGP field: a clustering study,Mon
R.G. Clowes,Automated quasar detection in the SGP field: a clustering study,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.218(1986) 139
1986
-
[30]
Penrose,On the gravitization of quantum mechanics 2: Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, Found
R. Penrose,On the gravitization of quantum mechanics 2: Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, Found. Phys.44(2014) 873
2014
-
[31]
K.A. Meissner, R. Penrose,The physics of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology(2025) [arXiv:2503.24263]
-
[32]
D. An, K.A. Meissner, P. Nurowski,Ring-type structures in the Planck map of the CMB,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.473(2018) 3251
2018
-
[33]
V.G. Gurzadyan, R. Penrose,On CCC-predicted concentric low-variance circles in the CMB sky,Eur. Phys. J. Plus128(2013) 2 [arXiv:1302.5162] – 43 –
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.