pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17646 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Crystallography, Lorentz violation, and the Standard-Model Extension

Marco Schreck , Rogeres A. da Silva Magalh\~aes
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scihep-phhep-th
keywords crystallographyLorentz violationStandard-Model Extensionbirefringencemagnetoelectric mediapoint groupsoptical properties
0
0 comments X

The pith

Crystal point groups map electromagnetic properties onto Lorentz-violating coefficients in the Standard-Model Extension.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a relationship between the electromagnetic sector of the Standard-Model Extension and optical media in crystals. It uses crystallographic and magnetic point groups to show that electromagnetic properties of different crystal structures are parametrized in the SME at an effective level. Birefringent and magnetoelectric media are examined in detail, with effects rediscovered and expressed in SME language. This framework allows materials with specific symmetries to serve as condensed-matter analogs for SME effects and supports proposals for crystals with unusual optical properties.

Core claim

At an effective level, electromagnetic properties associated with different crystal structures are demonstrated to be parametrized in the SME. Crystallographic and magnetic point groups provide the mathematical tools to show this correspondence. Birefringent and magnetoelectric media merit a dedicated study. Intriguing effects, which have not been described systematically in the modern literature, are rediscovered for the latter and expressed in SME language. With the setting developed, materials with specific symmetries such as birefringent or multiferroic crystals serve as condensed-matter analogs for SME effects.

What carries the argument

The correspondence between crystal point groups and SME coefficients that parametrizes optical responses in Lorentz-violating theories.

Load-bearing premise

The effective-level parametrization between crystal point groups and SME coefficients is complete and free of additional higher-order or lattice-specific corrections.

What would settle it

Measurement of electromagnetic wave propagation in a crystal with a known point group that fails to match the predicted SME parametrization for its symmetry class, for instance through unexpected birefringence patterns or magnetoelectric responses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17646 by Marco Schreck, Rogeres A. da Silva Magalh\~aes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Surface of constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Surface of constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Surface of constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Surface of constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dispersion surfaces for the purely timelike (a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Surface of constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The motivation behind the present work is to adopt methodology from field theory and high-energy physics to crystallography. In particular, we establish a relationship between the electromagnetic sector of the Standard-Model Extension (SME) for Lorentz invariance violation and optical media. At an effective level, electromagnetic properties associated with different crystal structures are demonstrated to be parametrized in the SME. Crystallographic and magnetic point groups provide the mathematical tools to show this correspondence. Birefringent and magnetoelectric media merit a dedicated study. Intriguing effects, which have not been described systematically in the modern literature, are rediscovered for the latter and expressed in SME language. With the setting developed at our disposal, materials with specific symmetries such as birefringent or multiferroic crystals serve as condensed-matter analogs for SME effects. It enables us to propose materials with unusual optical properties, which have not been thoroughly looked at in recent times.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a correspondence between the electromagnetic sector of the Standard-Model Extension (SME) for Lorentz violation and the optical properties of crystalline media. Crystallographic and magnetic point groups are used to constrain the allowed components of SME coefficients, with emphasis on birefringent and magnetoelectric media. Crystals are suggested as condensed-matter analogs for SME effects, and the work aims to rediscover or propose materials with specific optical properties.

Significance. If the effective mapping between point-group symmetries and SME coefficients is shown to be complete and quantitatively accurate, the paper could provide a useful bridge between high-energy effective field theory and crystal optics, enabling analog tests of Lorentz violation in table-top experiments and guiding the search for materials with unusual magnetoelectric responses. The absence of explicit derivations or comparisons to data in the abstract, however, leaves the practical significance unclear.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'electromagnetic properties associated with different crystal structures are demonstrated to be parametrized in the SME' is asserted without any explicit tensor mappings, derivations of the allowed SME coefficients under point-group constraints, or comparison to measured permittivity/magnetoelectric tensors. This makes it impossible to verify whether the correspondence is derived or merely stated at the effective level.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (and implied central claim): The mapping assumes that imposing crystallographic or magnetic point groups on SME coefficients fully captures the electromagnetic response tensors (permittivity, magnetoelectric coupling, etc.) of real crystals. No discussion addresses whether frequency-dependent dispersion, higher-multipole lattice effects, or operators outside the minimal SME photon sector could produce residuals not accounted for by the vacuum EFT framework.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a single sentence listing the specific SME coefficients (e.g., k_AF or k_F terms) that are being mapped to crystal tensors.
  2. [Introduction] The phrase 'intriguing effects, which have not been described systematically in the modern literature' should be supported by at least one concrete reference or example in the introduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. The feedback highlights opportunities to improve the clarity of our central claims and to explicitly address the scope of the effective-level correspondence. We respond to each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'electromagnetic properties associated with different crystal structures are demonstrated to be parametrized in the SME' is asserted without any explicit tensor mappings, derivations of the allowed SME coefficients under point-group constraints, or comparison to measured permittivity/magnetoelectric tensors. This makes it impossible to verify whether the correspondence is derived or merely stated at the effective level.

    Authors: The abstract is necessarily concise, but the manuscript body provides the explicit derivations. We apply crystallographic and magnetic point-group operations directly to the SME photon-sector operators to obtain the allowed coefficient structures, which in turn parametrize the electromagnetic response tensors. Concrete mappings are derived for birefringent and magnetoelectric media, with the resulting tensor forms compared to standard optical descriptions. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract to indicate that the parametrization follows from explicit point-group constraints (with references to the relevant sections) and will ensure the derivations are highlighted more prominently. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and implied central claim): The mapping assumes that imposing crystallographic or magnetic point groups on SME coefficients fully captures the electromagnetic response tensors (permittivity, magnetoelectric coupling, etc.) of real crystals. No discussion addresses whether frequency-dependent dispersion, higher-multipole lattice effects, or operators outside the minimal SME photon sector could produce residuals not accounted for by the vacuum EFT framework.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes a limitation of the effective description. Our analysis uses point-group symmetries to constrain the minimal SME photon-sector coefficients, thereby parametrizing the leading-order tensor structures of the electromagnetic response. It does not claim to reproduce all features of real crystals, including frequency dispersion, higher-multipole lattice contributions, or effects from non-minimal operators. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the introduction or conclusions clarifying the effective nature of the mapping and explicitly listing these caveats, so that the scope of the analogy is unambiguous. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: symmetry mapping between point groups and SME coefficients is a direct group-theoretic correspondence

full rationale

The paper applies established crystallographic and magnetic point groups to constrain the allowed components of SME coefficients in the electromagnetic sector. This is a standard symmetry-reduction procedure that does not reduce any claimed prediction or parametrization to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or definitional tautology. The abstract and described approach present the result as a dictionary between two independent formalisms (crystal optics and the minimal SME photon sector), with no load-bearing step that collapses by construction. External benchmarks such as known birefringence and magnetoelectric effects in crystals remain independently verifiable outside the paper's mapping.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that an effective-field-theory dictionary between two symmetry classifications can be written without additional dynamical constraints from the underlying lattice or from higher-dimensional operators. No new entities are introduced; the SME coefficients themselves are treated as external parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • SME Lorentz-violating coefficients
    The coefficients in the electromagnetic sector of the SME are free parameters of the theory; the paper assigns them to crystal classes but does not derive their values.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Electromagnetic response of a crystal is fully determined by its point-group symmetry at the effective level
    Invoked when the authors state that crystal structures are parametrized in the SME via point groups.
  • standard math Standard group-theory classification of crystallographic and magnetic point groups
    Background mathematics used to label allowed terms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1317 out tokens · 44854 ms · 2026-05-10T05:09:00.465775+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    To do so, the point group of the crystal lattice must be iden- tified

    Application to real minerals Tables II and III are valuable to parametrize electro- magnetic properties of real minerals found in nature. To do so, the point group of the crystal lattice must be iden- tified. Depending on the point group, the matricesϵand 11 Class Mineral Nonzero SME coefficients Entry in database ˜κ00 ˜κ11 ˜κ22 k1 k2 k3 k4 ktr θ 2/mDatol...

  2. [2]

    (53) Recall thatκ DB is an axial tensor

    Implementation of magnetic point groups Equations (13c) and (15c) tell us that the generic ma- trixκ DB containing degrees of freedom from both prin- cipal sectors ofkF is of the form κDB =   2(θ+k 2)−˜κ 03 ˜κ02 ˜κ03 −2k 9 2(θ−k 1)−˜κ 01 −˜κ02 + 2k8 ˜κ01 + 2k10 2(θ+k 1 −k 2)   . (53) Recall thatκ DB is an axial tensor. The transformation law of the SM...

  3. [3]

    Application to real magnetoelectric materials Let us consider an uniaxial material with nontrivial permittivity and magnetoelectric coupling described by the following diagonal matrices: ϵ= diag(ϵ t, ϵt, ϵl), α= diag(α t, αt, αl),(59) where the permeability is trivial:µ=1 3. So there are 6 nontrivial quantities: a transverse permittivityϵt and a transvers...

  4. [4]

    In all its generality, it is even more complicated than Eq

    Dispersion equations The dispersion equation for the second principal sector is manifestly quartic and does not factorize. In all its generality, it is even more complicated than Eq. (63), which is why we omit it. The dispersion equations for each coefficient separately are short enough to be stated and already contain much information. Let us start with ...

  5. [5]

    Dispersion relations The dispersion relations fork 3 . . . k7 can be conve- niently expressed via spatial vectorsuandvas follows: ω(±)(p) = p2 + 2ka(u·p)(v·p) ±2k ap (p·P u ·p)(p·P v ·p) 1 2 ,(82) which holds for the dispersion equation in the form of Eq.(73), i.e., beforecarryingoutanycoordinatetransfor- mation. Here,a∈ {3. . .7}and the result is express...

    2025

  6. [6]

    CPT Violation and the Standard Model

    D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecký, “CPT violation and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D55, 6760 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703464

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  7. [7]

    Lorentz-violating extensio n of the standard model

    D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecký, “Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D58, 116002 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9809521

    work page arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    CPT violation implies violation of Lorentzinvariance,

    O.W. Greenberg, “CPT violation implies violation of Lorentzinvariance,” Phys.Rev.Lett.89, 231602(2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0201258

    work page arXiv 2002

  9. [9]

    Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory,

    V.A. Kostelecký and S. Samuel, “Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory,” Phys. Rev. D39, 683 (1989)

    1989

  10. [10]

    CPT and strings,

    V.A. Kostelecký and R. Potting, “CPT and strings,” Nucl. Phys. B359, 545 (1991)

    1991

  11. [11]

    Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time,

    R. Gambini and J. Pullin, “Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time,” Phys. Rev. D59, 124021 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9809038

    work page arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    Loop quantum gravity and light propagation,

    J. Alfaro, H.A. Morales-Técotl, and L.F. Urrutia, “Loop quantum gravity and light propagation,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 103509 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0108061

    work page arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    On loop quantum gravity phenomenology and the issue of Lorentz invariance,

    M. Bojowald, H.A. Morales-Técotl, and H. Sahlmann, “On loop quantum gravity phenomenology and the issue of Lorentz invariance,” Phys. Rev. D71, 084012 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0411101

    work page arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    Bounds on length- scales of classical spacetime foam models,

    S. Bernadotte and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Bounds on length- scales of classical spacetime foam models,” Phys. Rev. D75, 024028 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610216

    work page arXiv 2007

  15. [15]

    Theory and phenomenology of space- time defects,

    S. Hossenfelder, “Theory and phenomenology of space- time defects,” Adv. High Energy Phys.2014, 950672 (2014), arXiv:1401.0276 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Lorentz and CPT breaking in gamma-ray burst neutrinos from string theory,

    C. Li and B.-Q. Ma, “Lorentz and CPT breaking in gamma-ray burst neutrinos from string theory,” JHEP 03, 230 (2023), arXiv:2303.04765 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Electrodynamics with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,

    V.A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, “Electrodynamics with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,” Phys. Rev. D80, 015020 (2009), arXiv:0905.0031 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    Kostelecky and M

    V.A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, “Neutrinos with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,” Phys. Rev. D85, 096005 (2012), arXiv:1112.6395 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Fermions with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,

    V.A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, “Fermions with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,” Phys. Rev. D88, 096006 (2013), arXiv:1308.4973 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Lorentz-violating spinor electrodynamics and Penning traps,

    Y. Ding and V.A. Kostelecký, “Lorentz-violating spinor electrodynamics and Penning traps,” Phys. Rev. D94, 056008 (2016), arXiv:1608.07868 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Gauge field theories with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,

    V.A. Kostelecký and Z. Li, “Gauge field theories with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,” Phys. Rev. D99, 056016 (2019), arXiv:1812.11672 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Backgrounds in gravita- tional effective field theory,

    V.A. Kostelecký and Z. Li, “Backgrounds in gravita- tional effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D103, 024059 (2021), arXiv:2008.12206 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Stability, causality, and Lorentz and CPT violation,

    V.A. Kostelecký and R. Lehnert, “Stability, causality, and Lorentz and CPT violation,” Phys. Rev. D63, 065008 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0012060

    work page arXiv 2001

  24. [24]

    Causality and radia- tively induced CPT violation,

    C. Adam and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Causality and radia- tively induced CPT violation,” Phys. Lett. B513, 245 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0105037

    work page arXiv 2001

  25. [25]

    Causality and CPT vi- olation from an Abelian Chern-Simons-like term,

    C. Adam and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Causality and CPT vi- olation from an Abelian Chern-Simons-like term,” Nucl. Phys. B607, 247 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0101087

    work page arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Photon decay in a CPT-violating extension of quantum electrodynamics,

    C. Adam and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Photon decay in a CPT-violating extension of quantum electrodynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B657, 214 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0212028

    work page arXiv 2003

  27. [27]

    Compton scattering in the presence of Lorentz and CPT violation,

    B. Altschul, “Compton scattering in the presence of Lorentz and CPT violation,” Phys. Rev. D70, 056005 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0405084

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2004

  28. [28]

    Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and photon triple-splitting in a Lorentz- noninvariant extension of quantum electrodynamics,

    C. Kaufhold and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and photon triple-splitting in a Lorentz- noninvariant extension of quantum electrodynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B734, 1 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0508074

    work page arXiv 2006

  29. [29]

    Vacuum Cherenkov radiation in spacelike Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory,

    C. Kaufhold and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation in spacelike Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory,” Phys. Rev. D76, 025024 (2007), arXiv:0704.3255 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2007

  30. [30]

    Gauge propagator and physical consistency of the CPT-even part of the standard model extension,

    R. Casana, M.M. Ferreira, Jr., A.R. Gomes, and P.R.D. Pinheiro, “Gauge propagator and physical consistency of the CPT-even part of the standard model extension,” Phys. Rev. D80, 125040 (2009), arXiv:0909.0544 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2009

  31. [31]

    Feynman propagator for the non- birefringent CPT-even electrodynamics of the standard model extension,

    R. Casana, M.M. Ferreira, Jr., A.R. Gomes, and F.E.P. dos Santos, “Feynman propagator for the non- birefringent CPT-even electrodynamics of the standard model extension,” Phys. Rev. D82, 125006 (2010), arXiv:1010.2776 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  32. [32]

    Consistency of isotropic modified Maxwell theory: Microcausality and unitarity,

    F.R. Klinkhamer and M. Schreck, “Consistency of isotropic modified Maxwell theory: Microcausality and unitarity,” Nucl. Phys. B848, 90 (2011), arXiv:1011.4258 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  33. [33]

    Models for low- energy Lorentz violation in the photon sector: Adden- dum to ‘Consistency of isotropic modified Maxwell the- ory’,

    F.R. Klinkhamer and M. Schreck, “Models for low- energy Lorentz violation in the photon sector: Adden- dum to ‘Consistency of isotropic modified Maxwell the- ory’,” Nucl. Phys. B856, 666 (2012), arXiv:1110.4101 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Analysis of the consistency of parity-odd nonbirefringent modified Maxwell theory,

    M. Schreck, “Analysis of the consistency of parity-odd nonbirefringent modified Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. D86, 065038 (2012), arXiv:1111.4182 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Massive photons and Lorentz violation,

    M. Cambiaso, R. Lehnert, and R. Potting, “Massive photons and Lorentz violation,” Phys. Rev. D85, 085023 (2012), arXiv:1201.3045 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Quantum field theory based on birefrin- gentmodifiedMaxwelltheory,

    M. Schreck, “Quantum field theory based on birefrin- gentmodifiedMaxwelltheory,” Phys.Rev.D89, 085013 (2014), arXiv:1311.0032 [hep-th]. 25

    work page arXiv 2014

  37. [37]

    Gupta- Bleuler photon quantization in the standard model extension,

    D. Colladay, P. McDonald, and R. Potting, “Gupta- Bleuler photon quantization in the standard model extension,” Phys. Rev. D89, 085014 (2014), arXiv:1401.1173 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  38. [38]

    Gupta-Bleuler quantization of the anisotropic parity- even and CPT-even electrodynamics of a standard model extension,

    R. Casana, M.M. Ferreira, Jr., and F.E.P. dos Santos, “Gupta-Bleuler quantization of the anisotropic parity- even and CPT-even electrodynamics of a standard model extension,” Phys. Rev. D90, 105025 (2014), arXiv:1408.4829 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Lorentz-violating mod- ification of Dirac theory based on spin-nondegenerate operators,

    J.A.A.S. Reis and M. Schreck, “Lorentz-violating mod- ification of Dirac theory based on spin-nondegenerate operators,” Phys. Rev. D95, 075016 (2017), arXiv:1612.06221 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Covariant quantization of CPT- violating photons,

    D. Colladay, P. McDonald, J.P. Noordmans, and R. Potting, “Covariant quantization of CPT- violating photons,” Phys. Rev. D95, 025025 (2017), arXiv:1610.00169 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Unitarity in Stück- elberg electrodynamics modified by a Carroll-Field- Jackiw term,

    M.M. Ferreira, Jr., J.A. Helayël-Neto, C.M. Reyes, M. Schreck, and P.D.S. Silva, “Unitarity in Stück- elberg electrodynamics modified by a Carroll-Field- Jackiw term,” Phys. Lett. B804, 135379 (2020), arXiv:2001.04706 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Lorentz and CPT violation in QED revis- ited: Amissinganalysis,

    O.M. Del Cima, J.M. Fonseca, D.H.T. Franco, and O. Piguet, “Lorentz and CPT violation in QED revis- ited: Amissinganalysis,” Phys.Lett.B688, 258(2010), arXiv:0912.4392 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    The Källén-Lehmann representation for Lorentz-violating field theory,

    R. Potting, “The Källén-Lehmann representation for Lorentz-violating field theory,” Phys. Rev. D85, 045033 (2012), arXiv:1112.5739 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  44. [44]

    Renormalizability of Yang-Mills theory with Lorentz violation and gluon mass generation,

    T.R.S. Santos and R.F. Sobreiro, “Renormalizability of Yang-Mills theory with Lorentz violation and gluon mass generation,” Phys. Rev. D91, 025008 (2015), arXiv:1404.4846 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Remarks on the renormalization properties of Lorentz- and CPT- violating quantum electrodynamics,

    T.R.S. Santos and R.F. Sobreiro, “Remarks on the renormalization properties of Lorentz- and CPT- violating quantum electrodynamics,” Braz. J. Phys.46, 437 (2016), arXiv:1502.06881 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    One-loop renormalization of Lorentz-violating electro- dynamics,

    V.A. Kostelecký, C.D. Lane, and A.G.M. Pickering, “One-loop renormalization of Lorentz-violating electro- dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D65, 056006 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0111123

    work page arXiv 2002

  47. [47]

    One-loop renormalization of pure Yang-Mills with Lorentz violation,

    D. Colladay and P. McDonald, “One-loop renormaliza- tion of pure Yang-Mills with Lorentz violation,” Phys. Rev. D75, 105002 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0609084

    work page arXiv 2007

  48. [48]

    One-Loop Renormalization of QCD with Lorentz Violation,

    D. Colladay and P. McDonald, “One-loop renormaliza- tion of QCD with Lorentz violation,” Phys. Rev. D77, 085006 (2008), arXiv:0712.2055 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    One-loop renormalization of the electroweak sector with Lorentz violation,

    D. Colladay and P. McDonald, “One-Loop renormaliza- tion of the electroweak sector with Lorentz violation,” Phys. Rev. D79, 125019 (2009), arXiv:0904.1219 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Renormalization of scalar and Yukawa field theories with Lorentz violation,

    A. Ferrero and B. Altschul, “Renormalization of scalar and Yukawa field theories with Lorentz violation,” Phys. Rev. D84, 065030 (2011), arXiv:1104.4778 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    Asymptotic states and renormalization in Lorentz-violating quan- tum field theory,

    M. Cambiaso, R. Lehnert and R. Potting, “Asymptotic states and renormalization in Lorentz-violating quan- tum field theory,” Phys. Rev. D90, 065003 (2014), arXiv:1401.7317 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    New two-sided bound on the isotropic Lorentz-violating parameter of modified-Maxwell theory,

    F.R. Klinkhamer and M. Schreck, “New two-sided bound on the isotropic Lorentz-violating parameter of modified-Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. D78, 085026 (2008), arXiv:0809.3217 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Limits on isotropic Lorentz violation in QED from collider physics,

    M.A. Hohensee, R. Lehnert, D.F. Phillips, and R.L. Walsworth, “Limits on isotropic Lorentz violation in QED from collider physics,” Phys. Rev. D80, 036010 (2009), arXiv:0809.3442 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Test- ing relativity with high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,

    J.S. Díaz, V.A. Kostelecký, and M. Mewes, “Test- ing relativity with high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,” Phys.Rev.D89, 043005(2014), arXiv:1308.6344[astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    Parton-model calcula- tion of a nonstandard decay process in isotropic modi- fied Maxwell theory,

    J.S. Díaz and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Parton-model calcula- tion of a nonstandard decay process in isotropic modi- fied Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. D92, 025007 (2015), arXiv:1504.01324 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Cherenkov radiation with massive, CPT-violating photons,

    D. Colladay, P. McDonald, and R. Potting, “Cherenkov radiation with massive, CPT-violating photons,” Phys. Rev. D93, 125007 (2016), arXiv:1603.00308 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for Lorentz- violating fermions,

    M. Schreck, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for Lorentz- violating fermions,” Phys. Rev. D96, 095026 (2017), arXiv:1702.03171 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Cosmic- ray fermion decay by emission of on-shell W bosons with CPT violation,

    D. Colladay, J.P. Noordmans, and R. Potting, “Cosmic- ray fermion decay by emission of on-shell W bosons with CPT violation,” Phys. Rev. D96, 035034 (2017), arXiv:1704.03335 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    New constraint for isotropic Lorentz violation from LHC data,

    D. Amram, K. Bouzoud, N. Chanon, H. Hansen, M.R. Ribeiro, Jr., and M. Schreck, “New constraint for isotropic Lorentz violation from LHC data,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 211801 (2024), arXiv:2312.11307 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Vac- uum Cherenkov radiation for nonminimal dimension- 5 Lorentz violation,

    A.Yu. Petrov, M. Schreck, and A.R. Vieira, “Vac- uum Cherenkov radiation for nonminimal dimension- 5 Lorentz violation,” Eur. Phys. J. C86, 30 (2026), arXiv:2508.21212 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Lorentz and CPT violat- ing Chern-Simons term in the derivative expansion of QED,

    J.-M. Chung and P. Oh, “Lorentz and CPT violat- ing Chern-Simons term in the derivative expansion of QED,” Phys. Rev. D60, 067702 (1999), arXiv:hep- th/9812132

    work page arXiv 1999

  62. [62]

    Radiatively-induced Lorentz and CPT violating Chern–Simons term in QED,

    J.-M. Chung, “Radiatively-induced Lorentz and CPT violating Chern–Simons term in QED,” Phys. Lett. B 461, 138 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9905095

    work page arXiv 1999

  63. [63]

    Exact calculation of the radiatively induced Lorentz and CPT violation in QED,

    M. Pérez-Victoria, “Exact calculation of the radiatively induced Lorentz and CPT violation in QED,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2518 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9905061

    work page arXiv 1999

  64. [64]

    P´ erez-Victoria, J

    M. Pérez-Victoria, “Physical (ir)relevance of ambiguities to Lorentz and CPT violation in QED,” JHEP04, 032 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0102021

    work page arXiv 2001

  65. [65]

    Jackiw and V

    R. Jackiw and V. A. Kostelecký, “Radiatively induced Lorentz and CPT violation in electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3572 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9901358

    work page arXiv 1999

  66. [66]

    Failure of gauge invariance in the non- perturbative formulation of massless Lorentz violating QED,

    B. Altschul, “Failure of gauge invariance in the non- perturbative formulation of massless Lorentz violating QED,” Phys. Rev. D69, 125009 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0311200

    work page arXiv 2004

  67. [67]

    GaugeinvarianceandthePauli-Villarsreg- ulator in Lorentz- and CPT-violating electrodynamics,

    B.Altschul, “GaugeinvarianceandthePauli-Villarsreg- ulator in Lorentz- and CPT-violating electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D70, 101701 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0407172

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2004

  68. [68]

    The ambiguity-free four-dimensional Lorentz-breaking Chern-Simons action,

    F.A. Brito, J.R. Nascimento, E. Passos, and A.Yu. Petrov, “The ambiguity-free four-dimensional Lorentz-breaking Chern-Simons action,” Phys. Lett. B 664, 112 (2008), arXiv:0709.3090 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    On the aether-like Lorentz-breaking actions,

    M. Gomes, J.R. Nascimento, A.Yu. Petrov, and A.J. da Silva, “On the aether-like Lorentz-breaking actions,” Phys. Rev. D81, 045018 (2010), arXiv:0911.3548 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Four-dimensional aether-like Lorentz- breaking QED revisited and problem of ambiguities,

    A.P. Baeta Scarpelli, T. Mariz, J.R. Nascimento, and A.Yu. Petrov, “Four-dimensional aether-like Lorentz- breaking QED revisited and problem of ambiguities,” Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2526 (2013), arXiv:1304.2256 [hep- th]. 26

    work page arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Ra- diative corrections and Lorentz violation,

    A.F. Ferrari, J.R. Nascimento and A.Yu. Petrov, “Ra- diative corrections and Lorentz violation,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, 459 (2020), arXiv:1812.01702 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Altschul, Phys

    B. Altschul, “There is no ambiguity in the radiatively induced gravitational Chern-Simons term,” Phys. Rev. D99, 125009 (2019), arXiv:1903.10100 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Altschul, L

    B. Altschul, L.C.T. Brito, J.C.C. Felipe, S. Karki, A.C. Lehum, and A.Yu. Petrov, “Three- and four-point functions in CPT-even Lorentz-violating scalar QED,” Phys. Rev. D107, 045005 (2023), arXiv:2211.11399 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Altschul, L

    B. Altschul, L.C.T. Brito, J.C.C. Felipe, S. Karki, A.C. Lehum and A.Yu. Petrov, “Perturbative aspects ofCPT-evenLorentz-violatingscalarchromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D107, 115002 (2023), arXiv:2304.03025 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation,

    V.A.KosteleckýandN.Russell, “DatatablesforLorentz and CPT violation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 11 (2011), arXiv:0801.0287 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  76. [76]

    Weyl metals,

    A.A. Burkov, “Weyl metals,” Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.9, 359 (2018), arXiv:1704.06660 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Lorentz violation in Dirac and Weyl semimetals,

    V.A. Kostelecký, R. Lehnert, N. McGinnis, M. Schreck, and B. Seradjeh, “Lorentz violation in Dirac and Weyl semimetals,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023106 (2022), arXiv:2112.14293 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Signals for Lorentz violation in electrodynamics

    V.A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, “Signals for Lorentz violation in electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D66, 056005 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0205211

    work page arXiv 2002

  79. [79]

    Lorentz-violating electrostatics and magnetostatics,

    Q.G. Bailey and V.A. Kostelecký, “Lorentz-violating electrostatics and magnetostatics,” Phys. Rev. D70, 076006 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0407252

    work page arXiv 2004

  80. [80]

    Newnham, Properties of Materials – Anisotropy, Symmetry, Structure (Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), 2005)

    R.E. Newnham, Properties of Materials – Anisotropy, Symmetry, Structure (Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), 2005)

    2005

Showing first 80 references.