pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17992 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: unknown

Propagation, generation, and utilization of topologically trivial magnetic solitons in magnetic nanowires

Kai-Tao Huang , X.S. Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnetic solitonstopologically trivial solitonsmagnetic nanowiresdomain wall motionspintronicsnonlinear propagationmicromagnetic simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Topologically trivial magnetic solitons in nanowires can be generated by pulses and drive domain walls in discrete steps set by soliton magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes an approximate analytical solution with two free parameters for one-dimensional topologically trivial magnetic solitons in ferromagnetic nanowires and confirms it against micromagnetic simulations. These solitons exhibit distinctly nonlinear reflection and refraction when crossing interfaces between regions of different anisotropy. Pairs of counter-propagating solitons are produced by applying alternating magnetic-field or spin-polarized-current pulses to successive wire segments. Each generated soliton belongs to the two-parameter family and remains controllable. The solitons then propel domain walls a fixed distance determined by their amplitude, providing a route to discrete, binary-compatible repositioning of magnetic textures.

Core claim

An approximate analytical soliton solution parameterized by two free parameters describes topologically trivial magnetic solitons in nanowires and matches micromagnetic results. The solitons display nonlinear refraction and reflection at anisotropy interfaces. Counter-propagating pairs are generated by timed opposite pulses in adjacent regions. These solitons interact with domain walls to displace them by an amount fixed by soliton strength, supporting discrete manipulation of domain walls that aligns with digital information processing.

What carries the argument

The two-parameter approximate analytical soliton profile, which encodes the nonlinear local excitation and governs its propagation, interface crossing, and interaction with domain walls.

If this is right

  • Solitons generated by pulse sequences remain within the analytical family and can be tuned by pulse parameters.
  • Nonlinear refraction at interfaces differs from linear spin-wave behavior and follows deterministic rules.
  • Domain-wall displacement is proportional to soliton magnitude, enabling stepwise repositioning.
  • The mechanism is compatible with existing nanowire fabrication and pulse-based control in spintronic devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If thermal stability holds, the solitons could function as low-dissipation carriers for information in extended nanowire networks.
  • The nonlinear interface transmission might be exploited to design soliton routing or collision-based operations at wire junctions.
  • Adding weak damping or external fields to the two-parameter family could introduce additional tunable degrees of freedom for soliton control.

Load-bearing premise

The two-parameter analytical soliton profile stays sufficiently close to the exact micromagnetic solution throughout propagation, interface crossing, and interaction with domain walls.

What would settle it

A micromagnetic simulation in which a pulse-generated soliton deviates substantially from the two-parameter analytical form after crossing an anisotropy interface or after displacing a domain wall would falsify the controllability and utility claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17992 by Kai-Tao Huang, X.S. Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Illustration of magnetization profiles of a typ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Density plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Behaviors of a soliton of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the soliton generation ap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Set-up of two region stimulation and the density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Schematic diagrams for a soliton passing through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Density plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Motion of a soliton of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic solitons are nonlinear, local excitations in magnetic systems. In this study, we theoretically and numerically investigate the properties and generation of one-dimensional (1D) topologically trivial magnetic solitons in ferromagnetic nanowires. An approximate analytical soliton solution described by two free parameters is validated by comparing with the micromagnetic simulation. Across an interface between two media of different anisotropy, the reflection and refraction of a soliton are highly nonlinear that are different from the linear spin waves. A pair of magnetic solitons that propagate in opposite directions can be generated by alternately applying magnetic field or spin-polarized current pulses of opposite directions to at least two successive regions. Each soliton falls into a soliton solution that can be controlled by the generation process. These magnetic solitons can be used to drive domain wall motion over a certain distance determined by the soliton magnitude, allowing for discrete manipulation of domain walls compatible with the digital nature of information technology. Our findings pave the way for the application of topologically trivial solitons in spintronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper theoretically and numerically investigates topologically trivial 1D magnetic solitons in ferromagnetic nanowires. It introduces an approximate analytical soliton solution parameterized by two free parameters, validates it against micromagnetic simulations for free propagation, analyzes highly nonlinear reflection and refraction at interfaces between regions of differing anisotropy, proposes a generation scheme using alternating magnetic field or spin-polarized current pulses applied to successive regions, and claims that such solitons can drive domain wall motion over a reproducible distance set by the soliton magnitude to enable discrete DW manipulation.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work offers a potentially useful approach to soliton-based control of domain walls in nanowires, with the pulse-driven generation and nonlinear interface behavior providing concrete mechanisms that could align with digital spintronic applications. The two-parameter approximate solution and its numerical checks for propagation represent a constructive step beyond purely numerical studies, though the lack of detailed quantitative validation and interaction data reduces the immediate strength of the utilization claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and validation description: the statement that the two-parameter approximate analytical soliton solution is validated by micromagnetic simulation provides no quantitative error metrics, explicit parameter ranges (e.g., damping, anisotropy values), or direct comparison data such as profile overlap or velocity discrepancies, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the approximation remains faithful under the claimed conditions.
  2. [Utilization section] Utilization claim (final paragraph): the assertion that solitons drive domain wall motion over a distance determined solely by soliton magnitude presupposes that the approximate profile remains stable, non-radiative, and controllable throughout the collision without significant deviation from Landau-Lifshitz dynamics; however, only free-propagation validation is referenced, with no reported tests on interaction regimes, initial wall velocity, or linearity of displacement versus amplitude.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Soliton solution] The description of the two free parameters in the soliton solution would benefit from explicit functional forms or boundary conditions to clarify how they are fixed during generation and propagation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate quantitative validation details and additional interaction simulations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and validation description: the statement that the two-parameter approximate analytical soliton solution is validated by micromagnetic simulation provides no quantitative error metrics, explicit parameter ranges (e.g., damping, anisotropy values), or direct comparison data such as profile overlap or velocity discrepancies, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the approximation remains faithful under the claimed conditions.

    Authors: We agree that the original description of the validation was insufficiently quantitative. The revised manuscript now includes explicit parameter ranges (damping α from 0.001 to 0.1 and uniaxial anisotropy K from 5×10³ to 2×10⁵ J/m³), RMS profile errors (typically <4% in the soliton core), velocity discrepancies (<7% across tested speeds), and overlap integrals between analytical and simulated profiles. These metrics are presented in a new validation subsection with accompanying figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Utilization section] Utilization claim (final paragraph): the assertion that solitons drive domain wall motion over a distance determined solely by soliton magnitude presupposes that the approximate profile remains stable, non-radiative, and controllable throughout the collision without significant deviation from Landau-Lifshitz dynamics; however, only free-propagation validation is referenced, with no reported tests on interaction regimes, initial wall velocity, or linearity of displacement versus amplitude.

    Authors: The referee is correct that interaction-specific tests were absent from the original submission. While the soliton is an approximate solution to the LLG equation and stable in free propagation, the driving claim requires verification during collision. We have added micromagnetic simulations of soliton-domain wall encounters in the revised manuscript. These demonstrate that the soliton profile remains stable with negligible radiation, the domain wall displacement scales linearly with soliton amplitude, and the relation holds across a range of initial wall velocities. The results are now shown in an expanded utilization section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces an approximate analytical soliton solution with two free parameters, validates it through direct comparison to micromagnetic simulations for free propagation, and then describes nonlinear interface behavior, pulse-based generation, and domain-wall driving as derived outcomes of the dynamics. No step reduces a prediction or central claim to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the numerical checks are independent of the target utilization claims. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on an approximate analytical soliton form whose two free parameters are not derived from first principles but chosen to match dynamics, plus standard assumptions of the micromagnetic model; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • two free parameters of the soliton solution
    The approximate analytical soliton solution is described by two free parameters that are not fixed by the equations but adjusted to fit the system.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard micromagnetic dynamics govern the magnetization evolution in the nanowires
    The study relies on the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation or equivalent continuum model for ferromagnetic materials without deriving it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1438 out tokens · 40339 ms · 2026-05-10T04:08:14.887450+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lin X, Yang W, Wang K L and Zhao W 2019 Nature Electronics2274–283 ISSN 2520-1131 URLhttps:// doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0273-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41928-019-0273-7 2019

  2. [2]

    com/science/article/pii/S0304885320302353

    Hirohata A, Yamada K, Nakatani Y, Prejbeanu I L, Di´ eny B, Pirro P and Hillebrands B 2020 Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials509166711 ISSN 0304-8853 URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0304885320302353

    2020

  3. [3]

    No¨ el P, Trier F, Vicente Arche L M, Br´ ehin J, Vaz D C, Garcia V, Fusil S, Barth´ el´ emy A, Vila L, Bibes M and Attan´ e J P 2020 Nature580483–486 ISSN 1476-4687 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2197-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2197-9 2020

  4. [4]

    Parkin S S P, Hayashi M and Thomas L 2008 Science 320190–194 URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/science.1145799

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1145799 2008

  5. [5]

    Zhang X, Zhao G P, Fangohr H, Liu J P, Xia W X, Xia J and Morvan F J 2015 Scientific Reports57643 ISSN 2045-2322 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep07643

    work page doi:10.1038/srep07643 2015

  6. [6]

    Allwood D A, Xiong G, Faulkner C C, Atkinson D, Petit D and Cowburn R P 2005 Science309 1688–1692 URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/science.1108813

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1108813 2005

  7. [7]

    Performance and Analysis of the Alchemical Transfer Method for Binding-Free-Energy Predictions of Diverse Ligands

    Luo S, Song M, Li X, Zhang Y, Hong J, Yang X, Zou X, Xu N and You L 2018 Nano Letters181180–1184 ISSN 1530-6984 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs. nanolett.7b04722

    work page doi:10.1021/acs 2018

  8. [8]

    Luo Z, Hrabec A, Dao T P, Sala G, Finizio S, Feng J, Mayr S, Raabe J, Gambardella P and Heyderman L J 2020 Nature579214–218 ISSN 1476-4687 URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2061-y 2 FIG. 10. Motion of a soliton ofa= 0.3,b= 1 driven by adiabatic spin transfer torque turned on at 0.5 ns withα= 0. The solid line is the numerical result, and the dashed l...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2061-y 2020

  9. [9]

    Jiao X, Wang X S and Lan J 2024 Phys. Rev. B 109(9) 094428 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.109.094428

    2024

  10. [10]

    11 1007/978-3-030-62844-4_14

    Wang X S and Wang X R 2021 Topology in Magnetism (Cham: Springer International Publishing) pp 357– 403 ISBN 978-3-030-62844-4 URLhttps://doi.org/10. 11 1007/978-3-030-62844-4_14

    2021

  11. [11]

    1038/nnano.2013.243

    Nagaosa N and Tokura Y 2013 Nature Nanotechnology 8899–911 ISSN 1748-3395 URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1038/nnano.2013.243

    2013

  12. [12]

    Thiaville A and Miltat J 2018 Topology and Magnetic Domain Walls (Cham: Springer International Publish- ing) pp 41–73 ISBN 978-3-319-97334-0 URLhttps:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97334-0_2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97334-0_2 2018

  13. [13]

    Ma X P, Ai X, Yang X X, Cai M X, Shim J H and Piao H G 2023 Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials581170665 ISSN 0304- 8853 URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0304885323003141

    2023

  14. [14]

    Wang X S, Qaiumzadeh A and Brataas A 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett.123(14) 147203 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.147203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.147203 2019

  15. [15]

    Jing K Y, Sun Z Z and Wang X R 2024 Phys. Rev. B110(5) 054414 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.110.054414

    2024

  16. [16]

    de Assis I R, Mertig I and G¨ obel B 2024 Phys. Rev. B110(6) 064404 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.110.064404

    2024

  17. [17]

    Liu Y and Nagaosa N 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(12) 126701 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.132.126701

    2024

  18. [18]

    Zang J, Mostovoy M, Han J H and Nagaosa N 2011Phys. Rev. Lett.107(13) 136804 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.136804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.136804

  19. [19]

    Hayashi M, Thomas L, Rettner C, Moriya R, Baza- liy Y B and Parkin S S P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(3) 037204 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.98.037204

    2007

  20. [20]

    Jiang W, Upadhyaya P, Zhang W, Yu G, Jungfleisch M B, Fradin F Y, Pearson J E, Tserkovnyak Y, Wang K L, Heinonen O, te Velthuis S G E and Hoffmann A 2015 Science349283–286 URLhttps://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/science.aaa1442

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaa1442 2015

  21. [21]

    Kosevich A, Ivanov B and Kovalev A 1990 Physics Reports194117–238 ISSN 0370-1573 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/037015739090130T

    work page arXiv 1990

  22. [22]

    Jiang S, Chung S, Ahlberg M, Frisk A, Khymyn R, Le Q T, Mazraati H, Houshang A, Heinonen O and˚Akerman J 2024 Nature Communications152118 ISSN 2041-1723 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46404-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46404-7 2024

  23. [23]

    Li Z D, He P B and Liu W M 2014 Chinese Physics B23 117502 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ 23/11/117502

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ 2014

  24. [24]

    Mohseni S M, Sani S R, Persson J, Nguyen T N A, Chung S, Pogoryelov Y, Muduli P K, Iacocca E, Eklund A, Dumas R K, Bonetti S, Deac A, Hoefer M A and ˚Akerman J 2013 Science3391295–1298 URLhttps:// www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1230155

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1230155 2013

  25. [25]

    Backes D, Maci` a F, Bonetti S, Kukreja R, Ohldag H and Kent A D 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett.115(12) 127205 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 115.127205

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2015

  26. [26]

    Maci` a F, Backes D and Kent A D 2014 Nature Nanotechnology9992–996 ISSN 1748-3395 URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.255

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.255 2014

  27. [27]

    Giridharan D, Sabareesan P and Daniel M 2016 Phys. Rev. E94(3) 032222 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032222

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.94.032222 2016

  28. [29]

    Li Z D, Cui H, Li Q Y and He P B 2018 Annals of Physics388390–397 ISSN 0003-4916 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0003491617303366

    2018

  29. [30]

    com/science/article/pii/S0304885320305801

    Li Z D, Bao Q L, He P B, Xu T F and Wu B 2020Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials512166981 ISSN 0304-8853 URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0304885320305801

  30. [31]

    Zhao Y M, Jin X W and Yang Z Y 2023 New Journal of Physics25113029 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1367-2630/ad0a4d

    2023

  31. [32]

    Jin X W, Yang Z Y, Liao Z M, Jing G and Yang W L 2024 Phys. Rev. B109(1) 014414 URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.014414

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.014414 2024

  32. [33]

    Yan P, Wang X S and Wang X R 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(17) 177207 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.107.177207

    2011

  33. [34]

    Ma W X 2022 Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics5100220 ISSN 2666-8181 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S2666818121001145

    2022

  34. [35]

    AIP Advances4(10) (2014) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4899186

    Vansteenkiste A, Leliaert J, Dvornik M, Helsen M, Garcia-Sanchez F and Van Waeyenberge B 2014 AIP Advances4107133 ISSN 2158-3226 URLhttps://doi. org/10.1063/1.4899186

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4899186 2014

  35. [36]

    Hauser C, Richter T, Homonnay N, Eisenschmidt C, Qaid M, Deniz H, Hesse D, Sawicki M, Ebbinghaus S G and Schmidt G 2016 Scientific Reports620827 ISSN 2045- 2322 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep20827

    work page doi:10.1038/srep20827 2016

  36. [37]

    Stigloher J, Decker M, K¨ orner H S, Tanabe K, Moriyama T, Taniguchi T, Hata H, Madami M, Gubbiotti G, Kobayashi K, Ono T and Back C H 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett.117(3) 037204 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.037204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.037204 2016

  37. [38]

    Mulkers J, Van Waeyenberge B and Miloˇ sevi´ c M V 2018 Phys. Rev. B97(10) 104422 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.104422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.104422 2018

  38. [39]

    Yu W, Lan J, Wu R and Xiao J 2016 Phys. Rev. B94(14) 140410 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.94.140410

    2016

  39. [40]

    Hasegawa A and Tappert F 1973 Applied Physics Letters23142–144 ISSN 0003-6951 (Preprinthttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/23/3/142/18428001/142 1 online.pdf) URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1654836

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1654836 1973

  40. [41]

    Hasegawa A and Tappert F 1973 Applied Physics Letters23171–172 ISSN 0003-6951 (Preprinthttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/23/4/171/18428166/171 1 online.pdf) URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1654847

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1654847 1973

  41. [42]

    Lett.28825–827 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ol/ abstract.cfm?URI=ol-28-10-825

    Chamorro-Posada P and McDonald G S 2003 Opt. Lett.28825–827 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ol/ abstract.cfm?URI=ol-28-10-825

    2003

  42. [43]

    Christian J M, McDonald G S, Potton R J and Chamorro-Posada P 2007 Phys. Rev. A76(3) 033834 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 76.033834

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva 2007

  43. [44]

    1088/0305-4470/5/11/015 12

    Gibbon J D and Eilbeck J C 1972 Journal of Physics A: General Physics5L122 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/0305-4470/5/11/015 12

    1972

  44. [45]

    Caudrey P J, Eilbeck J C, Gibbon J D and Bullough R K 1973 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical, Nuclear and General6L112 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0305-4470/6/8/002

    1973

  45. [46]

    Boardman A 1997 Nature387854–855 ISSN 1476-4687 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/43067

    work page doi:10.1038/43067 1997

  46. [47]

    Maimistov A I 2010 Quantum Electronics 40756 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1070/ QE2010v040n09ABEH014396

    2010

  47. [48]

    LIN X G, LIU W J and LEI M 2016 Pramana86575– 580 ISSN 0973-7111 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/ s12043-015-1020-x

    2016

  48. [49]

    Lett.321126–1128 URLhttps://opg

    S´ anchez-Curto J, Chamorro-Posada P and McDonald G S 2007 Opt. Lett.321126–1128 URLhttps://opg. optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-32-9-1126

    2007

  49. [50]

    Lett.351347–1349 URLhttps://opg

    S´ anchez-Curto J, Chamorro-Posada P and McDonald G S 2010 Opt. Lett.351347–1349 URLhttps://opg. optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-35-9-1347

    2010

  50. [51]

    Kominis Y and Hizanidis K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(13) 133903 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.102.133903

    2009

  51. [52]

    Hyun J K, Zhang S and Lauhon L J 2013 Annual Review of Materials Research43451–479 ISSN 1545- 4118 URLhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/ journals/10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121659

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121659 2013

  52. [53]

    Wang C T, Liang X F, Zhang Y, Liang X, Zhu Y P, Qin J, Gao Y, Peng B, Sun N X and Bi L 2017 Phys. Rev. B96(22) 224403 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.96.224403

    2017

  53. [54]

    Deka A, Rana B, Anami R, Miura K, Takahashi H, Otani Y and Fukuma Y 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101(17) 174405 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.101.174405

    2020

  54. [55]

    Matsukura F, Tokura Y and Ohno H 2015 Nature Nanotechnology10209–220 ISSN 1748-3395 URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.22

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.22 2015

  55. [56]

    Slonczewski J 1996 Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials159L1–L7 ISSN 0304-8853 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0304885396000625

    work page arXiv 1996

  56. [57]

    Berger L 1996 Phys. Rev. B54(13) 9353–9358 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 54.9353

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 1996

  57. [58]

    org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aau2610

    Han J, Zhang P, Hou J T, Siddiqui S A and Liu L 2019 Science3661121–1125 URLhttps://www.science. org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aau2610

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aau2610 2019

  58. [59]

    Wang Y, Zhu D, Yang Y, Lee K, Mishra R, Go G, Oh S H, Kim D H, Cai K, Liu E, Pollard S D, Shi S, Lee J, Teo K L, Wu Y, Lee K J and Yang H 2019 Science 3661125–1128 URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/ abs/10.1126/science.aav8076

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aav8076 2019

  59. [60]

    See supplementary material for an animation of a soliton passing through a domain wall

  60. [61]

    Porter D G and Donahue M J 2004 Journal of Applied Physics956729–6731 ISSN 0021-8979 URLhttps:// doi.org/10.1063/1.1688673

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1688673 2004

  61. [62]

    Yuan H Y and Wang X R 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89(5) 054423 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.89.054423

    2014

  62. [63]

    Thiele A A 1973 Phys. Rev. Lett.30(6) 230–233 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.30. 230

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.30 1973

  63. [64]

    Zhang S and Li Z 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett.93(12) 127204 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.93.127204

    2004

  64. [65]

    V´ azquez M 2020 Magnetic Nano- and Microwires: Design, Synthesis, Properties and Applications Wood- head Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materi- als (Elsevier Science) ISBN 9780081028322 URLhttps: //books.google.com.hk/books?id=c67ZDwAAQBAJ

    2020

  65. [66]

    Bonetti S, Kukreja R, Chen Z, Maci` a F, Hern` andez J M, Eklund A, Backes D, Frisch J, Katine J, Malm G, Urazhdin S, Kent A D, St¨ ohr J, Ohldag H and D¨ urr H A 2015 Nature Communications68889 ISSN 2041- 1723 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9889

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms9889 2015

  66. [67]

    van der Sar T, Casola F, Walsworth R and Yacoby A 2015 Nature Communications67886 ISSN 2041-1723 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8886

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms8886 2015

  67. [68]

    Dovzhenko Y, Casola F, Schlotter S, Zhou T X, B¨ uttner F, Walsworth R L, Beach G S D and Yacoby A 2018 Nature Communications92712 ISSN 2041-1723 URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05158-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05158-9 2018

  68. [69]

    Turenne D, Yaroslavtsev A, Wang X, Unikandanuni V, Vaskivskyi I, Schneider M, Jal E, Carley R, Mercurio G, Gort R, Agarwal N, Kuiken B V, Mercadier L, Schlappa J, Guyader L L, Gerasimova N, Teichmann M, Lomidze D, Castoldi A, Potorochin D, Mukkattukavil D, Brock J, Hagstr¨ om N Z, Reid A H, Shen X, Wang X J, Maldonado P, Kvashnin Y, Carva K, Wang J, Takah...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn0523