pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18086 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Materials Informatics Across the Length Scales

Jamal Abdul Nasir , Hamide Kavak , Oguzhan Der , Ali Ercetin , Amila Akagic , Jesper Friis , Francesca L. Bleken , Andrea Lorenzoni
show 3 more authors
Francesco Mercuri Scott M. Woodley Keith T. Butler
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords materials informaticsmultiscale modelingmachine learning potentialsdata-driven methodsuncertainty quantificationmicrostructure analysislength scalesdata standards
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reliability of materials informatics methods changes sharply across length scales from atoms to continuum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This perspective surveys data-driven techniques applied in materials science at the nanoscale, mesoscale, and micro-to-continuum levels. It shows that certain approaches achieve reliable results within a single scale, such as machine-learning interatomic potentials or surrogate models for microstructures, yet transferability and consistency suffer when moving between scales. A sympathetic reader would care because successful cross-scale integration could streamline design workflows from fundamental simulations to engineering predictions. The authors examine supporting elements like data quality, uncertainty handling, and standards that directly influence whether these methods can be combined in practice.

Core claim

Materials informatics demonstrates established capabilities at individual length scales through methods such as machine-learning interatomic potentials at the nanoscale, operator-learning models at the mesoscale, and learning-based analysis of experimental microstructures at micro-to-continuum levels, but reliability and transferability vary strongly with scale due to issues in data quality, uncertainty, interpretability, and cross-scale consistency.

What carries the argument

Scale-stratified assessment of data-driven models, with emphasis on how data standards, ontologies, and autonomous laboratories affect multiscale consistency.

If this is right

  • Adoption of shared data standards and ontologies would reduce inconsistencies when linking nanoscale simulations to continuum descriptions.
  • Better uncertainty quantification at each scale would improve the trustworthiness of integrated predictions for materials design.
  • Autonomous laboratories could supply higher-quality datasets that directly address current limitations in cross-scale transfer.
  • Focus on interpretability would clarify which parts of the workflow remain reliable when moving from atomistic to engineering scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A fully integrated system might eventually allow inverse design where a target property at the continuum level directly informs atomic-scale choices without intermediate human intervention.
  • Similar scale-dependent reliability patterns could appear in other domains that combine simulations and experiments, such as fluid dynamics or biological tissue modeling.
  • Targeted benchmarks that quantify prediction error propagation across scales would provide concrete metrics for progress toward integration.

Load-bearing premise

The selected examples of methods at each scale are representative enough to support general statements about reliability and transferability across the field.

What would settle it

A documented workflow that combines machine-learning interatomic potentials, mesoscale surrogate models, and microstructure analysis into a single, consistent multiscale prediction without manual data reconciliation or scale-specific adjustments would challenge the identified obstacles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18086 by Ali Ercetin, Amila Akagic, Andrea Lorenzoni, Francesca L. Bleken, Francesco Mercuri, Hamide Kavak, Jamal Abdul Nasir, Jesper Friis, Keith T. Butler, Oguzhan Der, Scott M. Woodley.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Model overview. Deep-learning workflow for automated localisation and classification of atomic columns in HAADF-STEM images of supported nanoparticles. Two U-Net-based networks are used to achieve sub-pixel column localisation and subse￾quent particle–support segmentation, enabling quantitative atomic-scale analysis under noisy, low-dose imaging conditions. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [40]. One of… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: MLIP predictions for silicon surface reconstructions and Au nanopar￾ticle melting. a, Si(111) (7×7) reconstruction and Si(100) dimer tilt. Left: scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM). Right: SOAP–GAP results: (i) Si(111) structure relaxed with SOAP–GAP and coloured by per-atom predicted local energy error when trained without adatoms; (ii) Jahn–Teller–induced ∼19◦ dimer tilt on Si(100). Reproduced with perm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Nonlocal charge transfer and ion-transport barriers captured by ML potentials. a, Nonlocal charge transfer in a polar ZnO slab: (top) side view of a Zn￾terminated face and the same slab with the O-terminated face hydrogenated; (bottom) corresponding atomic partial charges. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [26]. b, Lithium diffusion in Li7P3S11: NEB minimum-energy paths for representative hops. DFT is t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: ML surrogate architecture and long-horizon rollout accuracy for tip-induced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Materials model entities. The materials model entities are electrons and atoms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Incompatible definitions of a molecule in (a) chemistry and (b) physics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: How EMMO aligns the different definitions of molecule and atom from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of the top-level modules of EMMO. At the very top, we find the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The operating principle of an autoregressive LLM, in this case CrystaLLM. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The LLM is prompted with explicit instructions describing the task, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: An illustration of how an LLM agent system solves a task. A collection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Materials informatics is increasingly used to support modelling, analysis and design across the length scales of materials science, from atomistic simulations to microstructural characterisation and continuum descriptions. Despite rapid progress, the reliability and transferability of these approaches vary strongly with scale. Here we survey data-driven methods at the nanoscale, mesoscale, and micro-to-continuum levels, highlighting established capabilities as well as unresolved challenges. Machine-learning interatomic potentials, mesoscale surrogate and operator-learning models, and learning-based analysis of experimental microstructures are discussed, with emphasis on data quality, uncertainty, interpretability, and cross-scale consistency. We further examine the role of data standards, ontologies, and emerging tools, such as autonomous laboratories, where they directly affect multiscale workflows. This perspective clarifies what can be considered reliable today and identifies key obstacles to the broader integration of materials informatics across scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a perspective survey of materials informatics methods applied across length scales, from atomistic to continuum. It reviews machine-learning interatomic potentials at the nanoscale, mesoscale surrogate and operator-learning models, and learning-based analysis of experimental microstructures. Emphasis is placed on data quality, uncertainty quantification, interpretability, cross-scale consistency, data standards, ontologies, and autonomous laboratories in multiscale workflows. The central claim is that the survey clarifies what can be considered reliable today while identifying key obstacles to broader integration of these approaches.

Significance. If the curated examples prove representative, the perspective could usefully synthesize progress and challenges in multiscale materials modeling for the community. It draws attention to practical issues such as transferability and uncertainty that affect integration across scales, and it connects informatics tools to emerging infrastructure like autonomous labs. As a non-systematic survey, its contribution rests on the breadth of cited literature and the clarity with which obstacles are framed rather than on new derivations or quantitative benchmarks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Introduction and abstract: The claim that the perspective clarifies 'what can be considered reliable today' and identifies general obstacles rests on the assumption that the selected methods and challenges at each scale (ML interatomic potentials, surrogate/operator models, microstructure analysis) are representative. The manuscript provides no explicit inclusion criteria, coverage metrics, or discussion of omitted counter-examples, leaving statements on reliability, data quality, and transferability qualitative and potentially non-generalizable.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and concluding sections: No quantitative metrics, systematic comparisons, or balanced assessment of the highlighted methods are supplied to support the reliability assessments. The evaluations of capabilities and challenges appear to derive from qualitative synthesis of selected citations rather than a structured review, which limits the strength of the central claim for readers seeking actionable guidance.
minor comments (2)
  1. The first mention of 'operator-learning models' and 'mesoscale surrogate models' would benefit from a brief definition or pointer to foundational references to assist readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. Figure captions (where present) could more explicitly link the illustrated examples to the reliability and uncertainty issues discussed in the accompanying text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our perspective manuscript. The feedback usefully highlights opportunities to better frame the scope and limitations of a non-systematic survey. We respond to each major comment below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction] Introduction and abstract: The claim that the perspective clarifies 'what can be considered reliable today' and identifies general obstacles rests on the assumption that the selected methods and challenges at each scale (ML interatomic potentials, surrogate/operator models, microstructure analysis) are representative. The manuscript provides no explicit inclusion criteria, coverage metrics, or discussion of omitted counter-examples, leaving statements on reliability, data quality, and transferability qualitative and potentially non-generalizable.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript, as a perspective rather than a systematic review, does not supply explicit inclusion criteria, coverage metrics, or discussion of omitted cases. The examples were chosen to illustrate prominent methods and recurring issues across scales. We will add a dedicated paragraph to the introduction that states the selection rationale, notes the illustrative (rather than exhaustive) intent, and qualifies that reliability assessments are drawn from these representative cases. This revision will make the qualitative character of the claims explicit without changing the perspective format. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and concluding sections: No quantitative metrics, systematic comparisons, or balanced assessment of the highlighted methods are supplied to support the reliability assessments. The evaluations of capabilities and challenges appear to derive from qualitative synthesis of selected citations rather than a structured review, which limits the strength of the central claim for readers seeking actionable guidance.

    Authors: The manuscript is a perspective survey whose purpose is to synthesize trends and obstacles from the literature rather than to generate new quantitative benchmarks or perform systematic comparisons. We will revise the abstract and concluding sections to temper the central claim, explicitly noting that reliability evaluations rest on qualitative synthesis of selected examples and directing readers to the cited primary sources for quantitative details. A brief statement on the inherent limitations of such overviews will also be added to set appropriate expectations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: literature survey with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

This perspective paper surveys existing methods for materials informatics at different scales, highlighting capabilities and challenges from the literature. It contains no original equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or derivations that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. All statements draw on external citations rather than internal self-definitions or load-bearing self-citations. The central claims concern the current state of the field and obstacles to integration, which are qualitative assessments of published work and do not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey, the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies entirely on the prior literature it cites for all technical content.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1027 out tokens · 29078 ms · 2026-05-10T04:10:10.292333+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Autonomous materials discovery driven by gaussian process regression with inhomogeneous measurement noise and anisotropic kernels.Scientific reports, 10(1):17663, 2020

    Marcus M Noack, Gregory S Doerk, Ruipeng Li, Jason K Streit, Richard A Vaia, Kevin G Yager, and Masafumi Fukuto. Autonomous materials discovery driven by gaussian process regression with inhomogeneous measurement noise and anisotropic kernels.Scientific reports, 10(1):17663, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    Materials informatics.Materials Today, 8(10):38–45, 2005

    Krishna Rajan. Materials informatics.Materials Today, 8(10):38–45, 2005

    2005

  3. [3]

    Materials informatics and data system for polymer nanocomposites analysis and design

    Wei Chen, Linda Schadler, Cate Brinson, Yixing Wang, Yichi Zhang, Aditya Prasad, Xiaolin Li, and Akshay Iyer. Materials informatics and data system for polymer nanocomposites analysis and design. InHANDBOOK ON BIG DATA AND MACHINE LEARNING IN THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES: Volume 1. Big Data Methods in Experimental Materials Discovery, pages 65–125. World Scien- ...

    2020

  4. [4]

    Learning two-phase microstructure evolution using neural operators and autoencoder architectures.npj Computational Materials, 8(1):190, 2022

    Vivek Oommen, Khemraj Shukla, Somdatta Goswami, R´ emi Dingreville, and George Em Karniadakis. Learning two-phase microstructure evolution using neural operators and autoencoder architectures.npj Computational Materials, 8(1):190, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects.npj Computational Materials, 3(1):54, 2017

    Rampi Ramprasad, Rohit Batra, Ghanshyam Pilania, Arun Mannodi- Kanakkithodi, and Chiho Kim. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects.npj Computational Materials, 3(1):54, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Preisig, Yacine Rezgui, Natalia Konchakova, and Ali Daouadji

    Iman Peivaste, Salim Belouettar, Francesco Mercuri, Nicholas Fantuzzi, Hamidreza Dehghani, Razie Izadi, Halliru Ibrahim, Jakub Lengiewicz, Ma¨ el Belouettar-Mathis, Kouider Bendine, Ahmed Makradi, Martin Horsch, Peter Klein, Mohamed El Ha- chemi, Heinz A. Preisig, Yacine Rezgui, Natalia Konchakova, and Ali Daouadji. Artificial intelligence in materials sc...

    2025

  7. [7]

    E (3)- equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic po- tentials.Nature communications, 13(1):2453, 2022

    Simon Batzner, Albert Musaelian, Lixin Sun, Mario Geiger, Jonathan P Mailoa, Mordechai Kornbluth, Nicola Molinari, Tess E Smidt, and Boris Kozinsky. E (3)- equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic po- tentials.Nature communications, 13(1):2453, 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    Machine learning for molecular and materials science.Nature, 559(7715):547–555, 2018

    Keith T Butler, Daniel W Davies, Hugh Cartwright, Olexandr Isayev, and Aron Walsh. Machine learning for molecular and materials science.Nature, 559(7715):547–555, 2018. 30

    2018

  9. [9]

    Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation.APL materials, 1(1), 2013

    Anubhav Jain, Shyue Ping Ong, Geoffroy Hautier, Wei Chen, William Davidson Richards, Stephen Dacek, Shreyas Cholia, Dan Gunter, David Skinner, Gerbrand Ceder, et al. Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation.APL materials, 1(1), 2013

    2013

  10. [10]

    Re- cent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science

    Jonathan Schmidt, M´ ario RG Marques, Silvana Botti, and Miguel AL Marques. Re- cent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj computational materials, 5(1):83, 2019

    2019

  11. [11]

    Balachandran, Dezhen Xue, et al

    Turab Lookman, Prasanna V. Balachandran, Dezhen Xue, et al. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design.npj Computational Materials, 5, 2019

    2019

  12. [12]

    Fabio Le Piane, Mario Vozza, Matteo Baldoni, and Francesco Mercuri. Integrating high-performance computing, machine learning, data management workflows, and infrastructures for multiscale simulations and nanomaterials technologies.Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 15:1498–1521, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces.Physical review letters, 98(14):146401, 2007

    J¨ org Behler and Michele Parrinello. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces.Physical review letters, 98(14):146401, 2007

    2007

  14. [14]

    Gaussian ap- proximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons

    Albert P Bart´ ok, Mike C Payne, Risi Kondor, and G´ abor Cs´ anyi. Gaussian ap- proximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Physical review letters, 104(13):136403, 2010

    2010

  15. [15]

    Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials.Science Advances, 6(20):eaaz8867, 2020

    Benjamin P MacLeod, Fraser GL Parlane, Thomas D Morrissey, Florian H¨ ase, Lo¨ ıc M Roch, Kevan E Dettelbach, Raphaell Moreira, Lars PE Yunker, Michael B Rooney, Joseph R Deeth, et al. Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials.Science Advances, 6(20):eaaz8867, 2020

    2020

  16. [16]

    Advanced steel microstructural classification by deep learning methods

    Seyed Majid Azimi, Dominik Britz, Michael Engstler, Mario Fritz, and Frank M¨ ucklich. Advanced steel microstructural classification by deep learning methods. Scientific reports, 8(1):2128, 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature.Na- ture, 571(7763):95–98, 2019

    Vahe Tshitoyan, John Dagdelen, Leigh Weston, Alexander Dunn, Ziqin Rong, Olga Kononova, Kristin A Persson, Gerbrand Ceder, and Anubhav Jain. Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature.Na- ture, 571(7763):95–98, 2019

    2019

  18. [18]

    Cigdem Altintas and Seda Keskin. On the shoulders of high-throughput computa- tional screening and machine learning: Design and discovery of mofs for h2 storage and purification.Materials Today Energy, 38:101426, 2023

    2023

  19. [19]

    Machine learning approaches for the prediction of materials properties.Apl Materials, 8(8), 2020

    Siwar Chibani and Fran¸ cois-Xavier Coudert. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of materials properties.Apl Materials, 8(8), 2020

    2020

  20. [20]

    Accelerated development of perovskite-inspired materials via high- throughput synthesis and machine-learning diagnosis.Joule, 3(6):1437–1451, 2019

    Shijing Sun, Noor TP Hartono, Zekun D Ren, Felipe Oviedo, Antonio M Buscemi, Mariya Layurova, De Xin Chen, Tofunmi Ogunfunmi, Janak Thapa, Savitha Ra- masamy, et al. Accelerated development of perovskite-inspired materials via high- throughput synthesis and machine-learning diagnosis.Joule, 3(6):1437–1451, 2019. 31

    2019

  21. [21]

    Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python.the Journal of machine Learning research, 12:2825–2830, 2011

    Fabian Pedregosa, Ga¨ el Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python.the Journal of machine Learning research, 12:2825–2830, 2011

    2011

  22. [22]

    Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gre- gory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    2019

  23. [23]

    The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(27):273002, 2017

    Ask Hjorth Larsen, Jens Jørgen Mortensen, Jakob Blomqvist, Ivano E Castelli, Rune Christensen, Marcin Du lak, Jesper Friis, Michael N Groves, Bjørk Hammer, Cory Hargus, et al. The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(27):273002, 2017

    2017

  24. [24]

    Optimade, an api for exchanging materials data

    Casper W Andersen, Rickard Armiento, Evgeny Blokhin, Gareth J Conduit, Shyam Dwaraknath, Matthew L Evans, ´Ad´ am Fekete, Abhijith Gopakumar, Saulius Graˇ zulis, Andrius Merkys, et al. Optimade, an api for exchanging materials data. Scientific data, 8(1):217, 2021

    2021

  25. [25]

    General-purpose machine learning potentials capturing nonlocal charge transfer.Accounts of Chem- ical Research, 54(4):808–817, 2021

    Tsz Wai Ko, Jonas A Finkler, Stefan Goedecker, and J¨ org Behler. General-purpose machine learning potentials capturing nonlocal charge transfer.Accounts of Chem- ical Research, 54(4):808–817, 2021

    2021

  26. [26]

    Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials.Chem- ical Reviews, 121(16):10037–10072, 2021

    J¨ org Behler. Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials.Chem- ical Reviews, 121(16):10037–10072, 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    Nomad: The fair concept for big data-driven materials science.Mrs Bulletin, 43(9):676–682, 2018

    Claudia Draxl and Matthias Scheffler. Nomad: The fair concept for big data-driven materials science.Mrs Bulletin, 43(9):676–682, 2018

    2018

  28. [28]

    Multiscale modeling meets machine learning: What can we learn?Archives of computational methods in engineering: state of the art reviews, 28(3):1017, 2020

    Grace CY Peng, Mark Alber, Adrian Buganza Tepole, William R Cannon, Suvranu De, Salvador Dura-Bernal, Krishna Garikipati, George Karniadakis, William W Lytton, Paris Perdikaris, et al. Multiscale modeling meets machine learning: What can we learn?Archives of computational methods in engineering: state of the art reviews, 28(3):1017, 2020

    2020

  29. [29]

    Uncertainty prediction for machine learning models of material properties.ACS omega, 6(48):32431–32440, 2021

    Francesca Tavazza, Brian DeCost, and Kamal Choudhary. Uncertainty prediction for machine learning models of material properties.ACS omega, 6(48):32431–32440, 2021

    2021

  30. [30]

    Machine learning in elec- tron microscopy for advanced nanocharacterization: current developments, avail- able tools and future outlook.Nanoscale horizons, 7(12):1427–1477, 2022

    Marc Botifoll, Ivan Pinto-Huguet, and Jordi Arbiol. Machine learning in elec- tron microscopy for advanced nanocharacterization: current developments, avail- able tools and future outlook.Nanoscale horizons, 7(12):1427–1477, 2022

    2022

  31. [31]

    Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations

    J¨ org Behler. Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. The Journal of chemical physics, 145(17), 2016

    2016

  32. [32]

    Molecular dynamics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum-mechanical forces.Physical review letters, 114(9):096405, 2015

    Zhenwei Li, James R Kermode, and Alessandro De Vita. Molecular dynamics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum-mechanical forces.Physical review letters, 114(9):096405, 2015. 32

    2015

  33. [33]

    Zijiang Yang, Yuksel C Yabansu, Dipendra Jha, Wei-keng Liao, Alok N Choudhary, Surya R Kalidindi, and Ankit Agrawal. Establishing structure-property localization linkages for elastic deformation of three-dimensional high contrast composites using deep learning approaches.Acta Materialia, 166:335–345, 2019

    2019

  34. [34]

    Predicting compressive strength of consolidated molecular solids using computer vision and deep learning.Materials & Design, 190:108541, 2020

    Brian Gallagher, Matthew Rever, Donald Loveland, T Nathan Mundhenk, Brock Beauchamp, Emily Robertson, Golam G Jaman, Anna M Hiszpanski, and T Yong- Jin Han. Predicting compressive strength of consolidated molecular solids using computer vision and deep learning.Materials & Design, 190:108541, 2020

    2020

  35. [35]

    Dramatically enhanced combination of ultimate tensile strength and electric conductivity of alloys via machine learning screening.Acta Materialia, 200:803–810, 2020

    Hongtao Zhang, Huadong Fu, Xingqun He, Changsheng Wang, Lei Jiang, Long- Qing Chen, and Jianxin Xie. Dramatically enhanced combination of ultimate tensile strength and electric conductivity of alloys via machine learning screening.Acta Materialia, 200:803–810, 2020

    2020

  36. [36]

    Interpretable machine- learning strategy for soft-magnetic property and thermal stability in fe-based metal- lic glasses.npj Computational Materials, 6(1):187, 2020

    Zhichao Lu, Xin Chen, Xiongjun Liu, Deye Lin, Yuan Wu, Yibo Zhang, Hui Wang, Suihe Jiang, Hongxiang Li, Xianzhen Wang, et al. Interpretable machine- learning strategy for soft-magnetic property and thermal stability in fe-based metal- lic glasses.npj Computational Materials, 6(1):187, 2020

    2020

  37. [37]

    Machine learning boosts the design and discovery of nanomaterials.ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9(18):6130–6147, 2021

    Yuying Jia, Xuan Hou, Zhongwei Wang, and Xiangang Hu. Machine learning boosts the design and discovery of nanomaterials.ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9(18):6130–6147, 2021

    2021

  38. [38]

    Optimization of mechanical properties of multiscale hybrid polymer nanocomposites: A combination of experimental and machine learning techniques

    Elizabeth Champa-Bujaico, Ana M D´ ıez-Pascual, Alba Lomas Redondo, and Pilar Garcia-Diaz. Optimization of mechanical properties of multiscale hybrid polymer nanocomposites: A combination of experimental and machine learning techniques. Composites Part B: Engineering, 269:111099, 2024

    2024

  39. [39]

    A machine-learning-enhanced hierarchical multiscale method for bridging from molecular dynamics to continua.Neural Computing and Appli- cations, 32:14359–14373, 2020

    Shaoping Xiao, Renjie Hu, Zhen Li, Siamak Attarian, Kaj-Mikael Bj¨ ork, and Amaury Lendasse. A machine-learning-enhanced hierarchical multiscale method for bridging from molecular dynamics to continua.Neural Computing and Appli- cations, 32:14359–14373, 2020

    2020

  40. [40]

    Localization and segmentation of atomic columns in supported nanoparticles for fast scanning transmission electron microscopy.npj Computational Materials, 10(1):168, 2024

    Henrik Eliasson and Rolf Erni. Localization and segmentation of atomic columns in supported nanoparticles for fast scanning transmission electron microscopy.npj Computational Materials, 10(1):168, 2024

    2024

  41. [41]

    Atomistic modeling of the mechanical properties: the rise of machine learning in- teratomic potentials.Materials horizons, 10(6):1956–1968, 2023

    Bohayra Mortazavi, Xiaoying Zhuang, Timon Rabczuk, and Alexander V Shapeev. Atomistic modeling of the mechanical properties: the rise of machine learning in- teratomic potentials.Materials horizons, 10(6):1956–1968, 2023

    1956

  42. [42]

    Capturing the complexities of catalyst–support interactions with the help of machine learning, 2025

    Andrew S Rosen. Capturing the complexities of catalyst–support interactions with the help of machine learning, 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    Study of friction and wear behavior of graphene-reinforced aa7075 nanocomposites by machine learning.Journal of Nanomaterials, 2023(1):5723730, 2023

    ISNVR Prasanth, Prabahar Jeevanandam, P Selvaraju, K Sathish, SK Hasane Ahammad, P Sujatha, M Kaarthik, S Mayakannan, and Bashyam Sasikumar. Study of friction and wear behavior of graphene-reinforced aa7075 nanocomposites by machine learning.Journal of Nanomaterials, 2023(1):5723730, 2023. 33

    2023

  44. [44]

    Nanoscale engineering of catalytic materials for sustainable technologies.Nature nanotechnology, 16(2):129–139, 2021

    Sharon Mitchell, Ruixuan Qin, Nanfeng Zheng, and Javier P´ erez-Ram´ ırez. Nanoscale engineering of catalytic materials for sustainable technologies.Nature nanotechnology, 16(2):129–139, 2021

    2021

  45. [45]

    Construction of high accuracy machine learning interatomic potential for surface/interface of nanomaterials—a review.Ad- vanced Materials, 36(22):2305758, 2024

    Kaiwei Wan, Jianxin He, and Xinghua Shi. Construction of high accuracy machine learning interatomic potential for surface/interface of nanomaterials—a review.Ad- vanced Materials, 36(22):2305758, 2024

    2024

  46. [46]

    7×7 reconstruction on si (111) resolved in real space.Physical review letters, 50(2):120, 1983

    Gerd Binnig, Heinrich Rohrer, Ch Gerber, and Eduard Weibel. 7×7 reconstruction on si (111) resolved in real space.Physical review letters, 50(2):120, 1983

    1983

  47. [47]

    Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules.Science advances, 3(12):e1701816, 2017

    Albert P Bart´ ok, Sandip De, Carl Poelking, Noam Bernstein, James R Kermode, G´ abor Cs´ anyi, and Michele Ceriotti. Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules.Science advances, 3(12):e1701816, 2017

    2017

  48. [48]

    Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon.Physical Review X, 8(4):041048, 2018

    Albert P Bart´ ok, James Kermode, Noam Bernstein, and G´ abor Cs´ anyi. Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon.Physical Review X, 8(4):041048, 2018

    2018

  49. [49]

    A genetic algorithm trained machine-learned interatomic potential for the silicon–carbon sys- tem.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 128(29):12213–12226, 2024

    Michael MacIsaac, Salil Bavdekar, Douglas Spearot, and Ghatu Subhash. A genetic algorithm trained machine-learned interatomic potential for the silicon–carbon sys- tem.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 128(29):12213–12226, 2024

    2024

  50. [50]

    How to validate machine- learned interatomic potentials.The Journal of chemical physics, 158(12), 2023

    Joe D Morrow, John LA Gardner, and Volker L Deringer. How to validate machine- learned interatomic potentials.The Journal of chemical physics, 158(12), 2023

    2023

  51. [51]

    Plasmonic heating of nanostructures.Chemical reviews, 119(13):8087–8130, 2019

    Liselotte Jauffred, Akbar Samadi, Henrik Klingberg, Poul Martin Bendix, and Lene B Oddershede. Plasmonic heating of nanostructures.Chemical reviews, 119(13):8087–8130, 2019

    2019

  52. [52]

    Marie-Christine Daniel and Didier Astruc. Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications to- ward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology.Chemical reviews, 104(1):293–346, 2004

    2004

  53. [53]

    Data-driven simulation and characterisation of gold nanoparticle melting.Nature Communications, 12(1):6056, 2021

    Claudio Zeni, Kevin Rossi, Theodore Pavloudis, Joseph Kioseoglou, Stefano de Gironcoli, Richard E Palmer, and Francesca Baletto. Data-driven simulation and characterisation of gold nanoparticle melting.Nature Communications, 12(1):6056, 2021

    2021

  54. [54]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu.The Journal of chemical physics, 132(15), 2010

    Stefan Grimme, Jens Antony, Stephan Ehrlich, and Helge Krieg. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu.The Journal of chemical physics, 132(15), 2010

    2010

  55. [55]

    The tensormol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with long-range physics.Chemical science, 9(8):2261–2269, 2018

    Kun Yao, John E Herr, David W Toth, Ryker Mckintyre, and John Parkhill. The tensormol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with long-range physics.Chemical science, 9(8):2261–2269, 2018

    2018

  56. [56]

    Physnet: A neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges.Journal of chemical theory and computation, 15(6):3678–3693, 2019

    Oliver T Unke and Markus Meuwly. Physnet: A neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges.Journal of chemical theory and computation, 15(6):3678–3693, 2019. 34

    2019

  57. [57]

    Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations.The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 95(8):3358–3363, 1991

    Anthony K Rappe and William A Goddard III. Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations.The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 95(8):3358–3363, 1991

    1991

  58. [58]

    Reaxff: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 105(41):9396–9409, 2001

    Adri CT Van Duin, Siddharth Dasgupta, Francois Lorant, and William A Goddard. Reaxff: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 105(41):9396–9409, 2001

    2001

  59. [59]

    In- teratomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network.Physical review B, 92(4):045131, 2015

    S Alireza Ghasemi, Albert Hofstetter, Santanu Saha, and Stefan Goedecker. In- teratomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network.Physical review B, 92(4):045131, 2015

    2015

  60. [60]

    On the role of long-range electrostatics in machine-learned interatomic potentials for complex battery materials.ACS Ap- plied Energy Materials, 4(11):12562–12569, 2021

    Carsten G Staacke, Hendrik H Heenen, Christoph Scheurer, G´ abor Cs´ anyi, Karsten Reuter, and Johannes T Margraf. On the role of long-range electrostatics in machine-learned interatomic potentials for complex battery materials.ACS Ap- plied Energy Materials, 4(11):12562–12569, 2021

    2021

  61. [61]

    Chen Wang, Li Wang, Allan Soo, Nirenkumar Bansidhar Pathak, and Ho Kyong Shon. Machine learning based prediction and optimization of thin film nanocom- posite membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration.Separation and Purification Technology, 304:122328, 2023

    2023

  62. [62]

    Machine learning guided dopant selection for metal oxide-based photoelectrochemical water splitting: the case study of fe2o3 and cuo

    Zhiliang Wang, Yuang Gu, Lingxia Zheng, Jingwei Hou, Huajun Zheng, Shijing Sun, and Lianzhou Wang. Machine learning guided dopant selection for metal oxide-based photoelectrochemical water splitting: the case study of fe2o3 and cuo. Advanced Materials, 34(10):2106776, 2022

    2022

  63. [63]

    In- terpretable and explainable machine learning for materials science and chemistry

    Felipe Oviedo, Juan Lavista Ferres, Tonio Buonassisi, and Keith T Butler. In- terpretable and explainable machine learning for materials science and chemistry. Accounts of Materials Research, 3(6):597–607, 2022

    2022

  64. [64]

    In- terpretable, calibrated neural networks for analysis and understanding of inelastic neutron scattering data.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 33(19):194006, 2021

    Keith T Butler, Manh Duc Le, Jeyan Thiyagalingam, and Toby G Perring. In- terpretable, calibrated neural networks for analysis and understanding of inelastic neutron scattering data.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 33(19):194006, 2021

    2021

  65. [65]

    Forecasting the strength of nanocomposite concrete containing carbon nanotubes by interpretable machine learning approaches with graphical user interface

    Tianlong Li, Jianyu Yang, Pengxiao Jiang, Mohammed Awad Abuhussain, Athar Zaman, Muhammad Fawad, and Furqan Farooq. Forecasting the strength of nanocomposite concrete containing carbon nanotubes by interpretable machine learning approaches with graphical user interface. InStructures, volume 59, page 105821. Elsevier, 2024

    2024

  66. [66]

    Sulfur poisoning mechanism of lscf cathode material in the presence of so2: a computational and experimental study

    Rui Wang, Lucas R Parent, and Yu Zhong. Sulfur poisoning mechanism of lscf cathode material in the presence of so2: a computational and experimental study. Journal of Materials Informatics (Online), 3(1), 2023

    2023

  67. [67]

    J.Y. Choi, T. Xue, S. Liao, and J. Cao. Accelerating phase-field simulation of three- dimensional microstructure evolution in laser powder bed fusion with composable machine learning predictions.Additive Manufacturing, 79:103938, 2024. 35

    2024

  68. [68]

    Exploiting machine learning in multiscale modelling of materials.Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, 104(2):867–877, 2023

    Gautam Anand, Swarnava Ghosh, Liwei Zhang, Angesh Anupam, Colin L Free- man, Christoph Ortner, Markus Eisenbach, and James R Kermode. Exploiting machine learning in multiscale modelling of materials.Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, 104(2):867–877, 2023

    2023

  69. [69]

    Weiye Jin, Jiayun Pei, Pu Xie, Jincong Chen, and Haiyan Zhao. Machine learning- based prediction of mechanical properties and performance of nickel–graphene nanocomposites using molecular dynamics simulation data.ACS Applied Nano Materials, 6(13):12190–12199, 2023

    2023

  70. [70]

    Mesoscopic and multiscale mod- elling in materials.Nature materials, 20(6):774–786, 2021

    Jacob Fish, Gregory J Wagner, and Sinan Keten. Mesoscopic and multiscale mod- elling in materials.Nature materials, 20(6):774–786, 2021

    2021

  71. [71]

    A highly interpretable materials informatics approach for predicting microstructure-property relationship in fabric composites

    Tina Olfatbakhsh and Abbas S Milani. A highly interpretable materials informatics approach for predicting microstructure-property relationship in fabric composites. Composites Science and Technology, 217:109080, 2022

    2022

  72. [72]

    Lattice metamaterials with mesoscale motifs: exploration of property charts by bayesian optimization

    Roman Kulagin, Patrick Reiser, Kyryl Truskovskyi, Arnd Koeppe, Yan Beygelz- imer, Yuri Estrin, Pascal Friederich, and Peter Gumbsch. Lattice metamaterials with mesoscale motifs: exploration of property charts by bayesian optimization. Advanced Engineering Materials, 25(13):2300048, 2023

    2023

  73. [73]

    Mesoscale informed parameter estimation through machine learning: A case-study in fracture modeling.Journal of Computational Physics, 420:109719, 2020

    Nishant Panda, Dave Osthus, Gowri Srinivasan, Daniel O’Malley, Viet Chau, Diane Oyen, and Humberto Godinez. Mesoscale informed parameter estimation through machine learning: A case-study in fracture modeling.Journal of Computational Physics, 420:109719, 2020

    2020

  74. [74]

    Data-driven multi-scale modeling and optimization for elastic properties of cubic microstructures.Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 11(2):230– 240, 2022

    M Hasan, Y Mao, K Choudhary, F Tavazza, A Choudhary, A Agrawal, and P Acar. Data-driven multi-scale modeling and optimization for elastic properties of cubic microstructures.Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 11(2):230– 240, 2022

    2022

  75. [75]

    Understanding and design of metallic alloys guided by phase-field simulations.npj Computational Materials, 9(1):94, 2023

    Yuhong Zhao. Understanding and design of metallic alloys guided by phase-field simulations.npj Computational Materials, 9(1):94, 2023

    2023

  76. [76]

    Accelerating phase-field-based microstructure evolution predictions via surrogate models trained by machine learning methods.npj Computational Materials, 7(1):3, 2021

    David Montes de Oca Zapiain, James A Stewart, and R´ emi Dingreville. Accelerating phase-field-based microstructure evolution predictions via surrogate models trained by machine learning methods.npj Computational Materials, 7(1):3, 2021

    2021

  77. [77]

    Machine learning surrogate for 3d phase-field modeling of ferroelectric tip-induced electrical switch- ing.npj Computational Materials, 10(1):197, 2024

    K´ evin Alhada-Lahbabi, Damien Deleruyelle, and Brice Gautier. Machine learning surrogate for 3d phase-field modeling of ferroelectric tip-induced electrical switch- ing.npj Computational Materials, 10(1):197, 2024

    2024

  78. [78]

    Machine-learning-based surrogate modeling of microstructure evolution using phase-field.Computational Materials Science, 214:111750, 2022

    Iman Peivaste, Nima H Siboni, Ghasem Alahyarizadeh, Reza Ghaderi, Bob Svend- sen, Dierk Raabe, and Jaber Rezaei Mianroodi. Machine-learning-based surrogate modeling of microstructure evolution using phase-field.Computational Materials Science, 214:111750, 2022

    2022

  79. [79]

    Learning nonlinear operators via deeponet based on the universal approxi- mation theorem of operators.Nature machine intelligence, 3(3):218–229, 2021

    Lu Lu, Pengzhan Jin, Guofei Pang, Zhongqiang Zhang, and George Em Karni- adakis. Learning nonlinear operators via deeponet based on the universal approxi- mation theorem of operators.Nature machine intelligence, 3(3):218–229, 2021. 36

    2021

  80. [80]

    Rethinking materials simulations: Blending direct numerical simula- tions with neural operators.npj Computational Materials, 10(1):145, 2024

    Vivek Oommen, Khemraj Shukla, Saaketh Desai, R´ emi Dingreville, and George Em Karniadakis. Rethinking materials simulations: Blending direct numerical simula- tions with neural operators.npj Computational Materials, 10(1):145, 2024

    2024

Showing first 80 references.