pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18186 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Fundamentals and Applications of Hybrid Electro- and Opto-mechanical system coupled to Superconducting Qubit: A Short Review

Roson Nongthombam , Urmimala Dewan , Amarendra K. Sarma
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords superconducting qubitsmechanical resonatorstransmonfluxoniumelectromechanical systemsoptomechanicshybrid quantum systemsquantum sensors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Superconducting qubits couple to mechanical resonators through phase and charge degrees of freedom, producing both longitudinal and transverse interactions that extend to optical cavities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review establishes a unified perspective on hybrid quantum systems that combine mechanical resonators with superconducting qubits. It focuses on the transmon and fluxonium platforms to describe how interactions via the qubit's phase and charge properties generate distinct coupling types. The paper then shows how these electromechanical setups can incorporate optical cavities to create interfaces between microwave circuits and light. Such architectures matter because they combine the controllability of superconducting circuits with the sensitivity of mechanical motion and the long-range transmission of optics. A sympathetic reader would see this as a practical map for designing quantum sensors and transducers that link different physical domains.

Core claim

The paper surveys superconducting hybrid quantum electromechanical systems in which mechanical resonators are coupled to superconducting qubits, with a focus on two widely used qubit platforms: the transmon and the fluxonium. It provides an overview of the underlying coupling mechanisms arising from interactions through the phase and charge degrees of freedom of the qubit, and discusses how these mechanisms give rise to both longitudinal and transverse qubit-mechanical interactions. It further reviews extensions of electromechanical platforms to electro-optomechanical architectures, in which optical cavities are integrated to enable coherent interfacing between superconducting circuits and,

What carries the argument

The coupling mechanisms arising from interactions through the phase and charge degrees of freedom of the transmon and fluxonium qubits, which generate longitudinal and transverse qubit-mechanical interactions and allow extension to optical cavities.

If this is right

  • These couplings support precise readout and control of mechanical motion using qubit-based circuits for quantum sensing applications.
  • Adding optical cavities enables coherent conversion between microwave and optical signals in hybrid networks.
  • The distinction between longitudinal and transverse interactions guides selection of qubit-resonator geometries for specific sensing or transduction tasks.
  • The unified framework aids design of scalable devices that integrate mechanical, electrical, and optical elements for quantum technologies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phase-charge approach could be tested for predicting coupling in fluxonium variants with different junction parameters.
  • Hybrid systems of this type may enable new mechanical sensors that detect forces at the quantum limit by leveraging the optical readout channel.
  • Extending the framework to include multiple mechanical modes could reveal collective effects not addressed in the single-resonator focus.
  • Applications in gravitational sensing or dark matter searches could benefit if the longitudinal couplings prove more robust against certain noise sources.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that limiting the survey to transmon and fluxonium platforms plus electro-optomechanical extensions captures the key coupling mechanisms without major omissions from other qubit types.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement on a hybrid system using a different superconducting qubit, such as a charge or phase qubit, that exhibits coupling strengths or interaction types not accounted for by the phase and charge mechanisms described.

read the original abstract

Superconducting qubits, realized by incorporating Josephson junctions into superconducting circuits, behave as artificial atoms with anharmonic energy spectra and can be precisely controlled and measured using microwave cavities within the framework of circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED). Since its emergence in the early 2000s, cQED has established superconducting qubits as leading candidates for scalable quantum devices and has enabled the exploration of hybrid quantum systems that integrate disparate physical platformsThis review surveys superconducting hybrid quantum electromechanical systems in which mechanical resonators are coupled to superconducting qubits, with a focus on two widely used qubit platforms: the transmon and the fluxonium. We provide an overview of the underlying coupling mechanisms arising from interactions through the phase and charge degrees of freedom of the qubit, and discuss how these mechanisms give rise to both longitudinal and transverse qubit-mechanical interactions. We further review extensions of electromechanical platforms to electro-optomechanical architectures, in which optical cavities are integrated to enable coherent interfacing between superconducting circuits and optical photons. This review aims to present a unified framework and perspective on qubit-mechanical and qubit-mechanical-optical hybrid systems in superconducting quantum technologies and applications related to sensors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a short review surveying superconducting hybrid quantum electromechanical systems in which mechanical resonators are coupled to superconducting qubits, focusing specifically on the transmon and fluxonium platforms. It overviews the underlying coupling mechanisms arising from interactions through the phase and charge degrees of freedom of the qubit and how these give rise to both longitudinal and transverse qubit-mechanical interactions. The review further covers extensions to electro-optomechanical architectures integrating optical cavities for coherent interfacing between superconducting circuits and optical photons, with the aim of presenting a unified framework and perspective on these hybrid systems for applications in quantum sensors.

Significance. If the review accurately represents the cited literature on coupling mechanisms without major omissions within its stated scope, it could serve as a useful introductory resource for researchers working on hybrid quantum systems. The explicit focus on transmon and fluxonium allows for a targeted discussion of phase- and charge-mediated couplings, and the inclusion of electro-optomechanical extensions highlights pathways for multi-modal quantum interfaces. As a synthesis rather than original research, its value lies in providing a coherent perspective on an active area of circuit QED, provided the overview is balanced and up-to-date.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Coupling Mechanisms): The classification of interactions into longitudinal and transverse types is central to the review's framework, yet the text does not provide explicit interaction Hamiltonians (e.g., terms proportional to σ_z x or σ_x x) derived from the phase or charge operators; without these, readers cannot independently verify how the mechanisms map to the claimed interaction types.
  2. [§5] §5 (Electro-optomechanical extensions): The claim that optical cavities enable coherent interfacing is load-bearing for the unified framework, but the section lacks quantitative discussion of conversion efficiencies or added noise from the cited electro-optomechanical experiments, which is necessary to assess practical feasibility for sensor applications.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Typo in 'platformsThis review' (missing space after 'platforms').
  2. [Figures] Figure 2 (or equivalent schematic): The diagram illustrating phase vs. charge coupling would benefit from labels indicating the qubit operators involved to improve clarity for readers new to the field.
  3. [References] References: Several key papers on fluxonium-mechanical coupling from 2022-2023 appear underrepresented; adding them would strengthen the overview.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and utility of the review. We have revised the manuscript to address both major points raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Coupling Mechanisms): The classification of interactions into longitudinal and transverse types is central to the review's framework, yet the text does not provide explicit interaction Hamiltonians (e.g., terms proportional to σ_z x or σ_x x) derived from the phase or charge operators; without these, readers cannot independently verify how the mechanisms map to the claimed interaction types.

    Authors: We agree that explicit interaction Hamiltonians would strengthen the presentation and allow readers to directly verify the mapping from qubit phase/charge operators to longitudinal and transverse couplings. In the revised manuscript, we have added the relevant Hamiltonian terms in §3 for both the transmon and fluxonium platforms, explicitly deriving the σ_z x (longitudinal) and σ_x x (transverse) contributions from the underlying charge and phase interactions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Electro-optomechanical extensions): The claim that optical cavities enable coherent interfacing is load-bearing for the unified framework, but the section lacks quantitative discussion of conversion efficiencies or added noise from the cited electro-optomechanical experiments, which is necessary to assess practical feasibility for sensor applications.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative details on conversion efficiencies and added noise would better support assessment of practical feasibility. Although the review is concise and focuses on the conceptual unified framework, we have added a short paragraph in §5 that summarizes representative conversion efficiencies and noise levels drawn from the cited electro-optomechanical experiments, together with references to the original works for readers seeking full quantitative analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review paper with no new derivations

full rationale

This is a short review surveying existing literature on hybrid electro- and opto-mechanical systems coupled to transmon and fluxonium superconducting qubits. It provides an overview of coupling mechanisms (phase/charge degrees of freedom leading to longitudinal and transverse interactions) and extensions to electro-optomechanical architectures, but introduces no original equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or uniqueness theorems. All claims reference external literature without self-referential reductions or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the central overview to its own inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This review introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies entirely on summarizing mechanisms and platforms from the existing literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5515 in / 1084 out tokens · 54069 ms · 2026-05-10T04:58:14.685138+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature Reviews Physics4, 1 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00410-6

    Nature: 40 years of quantum computing. Nature Reviews Physics4, 1 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00410-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00410-6 2022

  2. [2]

    Bennett, C.H., Wiesner, S.J.: Communication via one- and two-particle opera- tors on einstein-podolsky-rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2881 (1992) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 1992

  3. [3]

    Secure quantum key distribution , Volume =

    Lo, H.-K., Curty, M., Tamaki, K.: Secure quantum key distribution. Nature Photonics8, 595–604 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.149

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.149 2014

  4. [4]

    Degen, C.L., Reinhard, F., Cappellaro, P.: Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 36

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 2017

  5. [5]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity27(8), 084006 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084006

    Harry, G.M., LIGO Scientific Collaboration): Advanced ligo: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors. Classical and Quantum Gravity27(8), 084006 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084006

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084006 2010

  6. [6]

    New Journal of Physics23(2), 023041 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/abd9e7

    Carney, D., Hook, A., Liu, Z., Taylor, J.M., Zhao, Y.: Ultralight dark mat- ter detection with mechanical quantum sensors. New Journal of Physics23(2), 023041 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/abd9e7

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abd9e7 2021

  7. [7]

    Simulating physics with computers,

    Feynman, R.P.: Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics21, 467–488 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02650179 1982

  8. [8]

    Optics News11, 11–20 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1364/ON.11.2.000011

    Feynman, R.P.: Quantum mechanical computers. Optics News11, 11–20 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1364/ON.11.2.000011

    work page doi:10.1364/on.11.2.000011 1985

  9. [9]

    Deutsch, D.: Quantum theory, the church–turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A400, 97–117 (1985) https://doi.org/ 10.1098/rspa.1985.0070

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 1985

  10. [10]

    SIAM Journal on Computing26, 1474–1483 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539796298637

    Simon, D.R.: On the power of quantum computation. SIAM Journal on Computing26, 1474–1483 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539796298637

    work page doi:10.1137/s0097539796298637 1997

  11. [11]

    1996.548464

    Shor, P.W.: Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete log- arithms on a quantum computer, 56–65 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS. 1996.548464

    work page doi:10.1109/sfcs 1996

  12. [12]

    Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 124–134 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700

    Shor, P.W.: Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 124–134 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700

    work page doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 1994

  13. [13]

    Cory, D.G., Fahmy, A.F., Havel, T.F.: Ensemble quantum computing by nmr spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.94, 1634–1639 (1997) https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.94.5.1634

    1997

  14. [14]

    Cirac, J.I., Zoller, P.: Quantum computations with cold trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4091–4094 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4091

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 1995

  15. [15]

    Loss, D., DiVincenzo, D.P.: Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A57, 120–126 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 1998

  16. [16]

    Nature409, 46–52 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1038/ 35051009

    Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Milburn, G.J.: A scheme for efficient quantum com- putation with linear optics. Nature409, 46–52 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1038/ 35051009

    2001

  17. [17]

    Physics Letters1, 251–253 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0

    Josephson, B.D.: Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Physics Letters1, 251–253 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0 1962

  18. [18]

    Jaklevic, R.C., Lambe, J., Silver, A.H., Mercereau, J.E.: Quantum interference effects in josephson tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett.12, 159–160 (1964) https://doi. 37 org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.159

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.12.159 1964

  19. [19]

    Jaklevic, R.C., Lambe, J., Mercereau, J.E., Silver, A.H.: Quantum interference effects in josephson tunneling. Phys. Rev.140, 1628–1637 (1965) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1628

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1628 1965

  20. [20]

    Annals of Physics149, 374–456 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(83) 90202-6

    Caldeira, A.O., Leggett, A.J.: Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system. Annals of Physics149, 374–456 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(83) 90202-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(83 1983

  21. [21]

    Martinis, J.M., Devoret, M.H., Clarke, J.: Energy-level quantization in the zero- voltage state of a current-biased josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 1543– 1546 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1543

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.1543 1985

  22. [22]

    Science285, 1036–1039 (1999) https://doi.org/10

    Mooij, J.E., Orlando, T.P., Levitov, L., Tian, L., Wal, C.H., Lloyd, S.: Joseph- son persistent-current qubit. Science285, 1036–1039 (1999) https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.285.5430.1036

    work page arXiv 1999

  23. [23]

    Steffen, M., Martinis, J.M., Chuang, I.L.: Accurate control of josephson phase qubits. Phys. Rev. B68, 224518 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68. 224518

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.68 2003

  24. [24]

    Martinis, J.M., Nam, S., Aumentado, J., Urbina, C.: Rabi oscillations in a large josephson-junction qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 117901 (2002) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.117901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.117901 2002

  25. [25]

    Koch, J., Yu, T.M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A.A., Schuster, D.I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M.H., Girvin, S.M.: Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.76.042319

    2007

  26. [26]

    Nature453, 1031– 1042 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07128

    Clarke, J., Wilhelm, F.K.: Superconducting quantum bits. Nature453, 1031– 1042 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07128

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07128 2008

  27. [27]

    Quantum Information Processing3, 163–203 (2004) https://doi

    Devoret, M.H., Martinis, J.M.: Implementing qubits with superconducting inte- grated circuits. Quantum Information Processing3, 163–203 (2004) https://doi. org/10.1007/s11128-004-3101-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-004-3101-5 2004

  28. [28]

    Blais, A., Grimsmo, A.L., Girvin, S.M., Wallraff, A.: Circuit quantum elec- trodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.93.025005

    2021

  29. [29]

    Blais, A., Huang, R.-S., Wallraff, A., Girvin, S.M., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architec- ture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A69, 062320 (2004) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320 38

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062320 2004

  30. [31]

    Nature431, 162–167 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02851

    Wallraff, A., Schuster, D.I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R.-S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S.M., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature431, 162–167 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02851

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02851 2004

  31. [32]

    Science326, 113–116 (2009) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1175552

    Manucharyan, V.E., Koch, J., Glazman, L.I., , Devoret, M.H.: Fluxonium: Single cooper-pair circuit free of charge offsets. Science326, 113–116 (2009) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1175552

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1175552 2009

  32. [33]

    PRX Quantum4, 040342 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040342

    Lee, N.R.A., Guo, Y., Cleland, A.Y., Wollack, E.A., Gruenke, R.G., Takuma Makihara, Z.W., Rajabzadeh, T., Jiang, W.: Strong dispersive coupling between a mechanical resonator and a fluxonium superconducting qubit. PRX Quantum4, 040342 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040342

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.040342 2023

  33. [34]

    Zhang, H., Chakram, S., Roy, T., Earnest, N., Lu, Y., Huang, Z., Weiss, D.K., Koch, J., Schuster, D.I.: Universal fast-flux control of a coherent, low-frequency qubit. Phys. Rev. X11, 011010 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11. 011010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11 2021

  34. [35]

    PRX Quantum3, 037001 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.3.037001

    Nguyen, L.B., Koolstra, G., Kim, Y., Morvan, A., Chistolini, T., Singh, S., Nes- terov, K.N., J¨ unger, C., Chen, L.: Blueprint for a high-performance fluxonium quantum processor. PRX Quantum3, 037001 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.3.037001

    2022

  35. [36]

    Ding, L., Hays, M., Sung, Y., Kannan, B., An, J., Paolo, A.D., Karamlou, A.H., Hazard, T.M., Azar, K.: High-fidelity, frequency-flexible two-qubit fluxonium gates with a transmon coupler. Phys. Rev. X13, 031035 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.031035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.031035 2023

  36. [37]

    Bao, F., Deng, H., Ding, D., Gao, R., Gao, X., Huang, C., Jiang, X., Ku, H.- S., Li, Z.: Fluxonium: An alternative qubit platform for high-fidelity operations. Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 010502 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129. 010502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129 2022

  37. [38]

    Nguyen, L.B., Lin, Y.-H., Somoroff, A., Mencia, R., Grabon, N., Manucharyan, V.E.: High-coherence fluxonium qubit. Phys. Rev. X9, 041041 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041041

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041041 2019

  38. [39]

    Nature Physics16(3), 257–267 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0797-9 39

    Clerk, A.A., Lehnert, K.W., Bertet, P., Petta, J.R., Nakamura, Y.: Hybrid quantum systems with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature Physics16(3), 257–267 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0797-9 39

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0797-9 2020

  39. [40]

    Schuster, D.I., Sears, A.P., Ginossar, E., DiCarlo, L., Frunzio, L., Morton, J.J.L., Wu, H., Briggs, G.A.D., Buckley, B.B.: High-cooperativity coupling of electron- spin ensembles to superconducting cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 140501 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.140501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.140501 2010

  40. [41]

    Nature464, 697–703 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature08967

    O’Connell, A.D., Hofheinz, M., Ansmann, M., Bialczak, R.C., Lenander, M., Lucero, E., Neeley, M., Sank, D., Wang, H., Weides, M., Wenner, J., Marti- nis, J.M., Cleland, A.N.: Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator. Nature464, 697–703 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature08967

    2010

  41. [43]

    Nature 490, 380–383 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11559

    Petersson, K.D., McFaul, L.W., Schroer, M.D., Jung, M., Taylor, J.M., Houck, A.A., Petta, J.R.: Circuit quantum electrodynamics with a spin qubit. Nature 490, 380–383 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11559

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11559 2012

  42. [44]

    Nature494, 211–215 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11821

    Pirkkalainen, J.-M., Cho, S.U., Li, J., Paraoanu, G.S., Hakonen, P.J., Sillanp¨ a¨ a, S.M.: Hybrid circuit cavity quantum electrodynamics with a micromechanical resonator. Nature494, 211–215 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11821

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11821 2013

  43. [45]

    Lecocq, F., Teufel, J.D., Aumentado, J., Simmonds, R.W.: Resolving the vacuum fluctuations of an optomechanical system using an artificial atom. Nat. Phys. 11, 635–639 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3365

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3365 2015

  44. [46]

    Nature459, 960–964 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08093

    LaHaye, M.D., Suh, J., Echternach, P.M., Schwab, K.C., Roukes, M.L.: Nanome- chanical measurements of a superconducting qubit. Nature459, 960–964 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08093

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08093 2009

  45. [47]

    Communications Physics4, 12 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00514-y

    Bera, T., Majumder, S., Sahu, S.K., Singh, V.: Large flux-mediated coupling in hybrid electromechanical system with a transmon qubit. Communications Physics4, 12 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00514-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-020-00514-y 2021

  46. [48]

    Bera, T., Kandpal, M., Agarwal, G.S., Singh, V.: Single-photon induced insta- bilities in a cavity electromechanical device. Nat. Commun.15, 7115 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51499-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51499-z 2024

  47. [49]

    Rodrigues, I.C., Bothner, D., Steele, G.A.: Coupling microwave photons to a mechanical resonator using quantum interference. Nat. Commun.10, 5359 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12964-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12964-2 2019

  48. [50]

    Science364, 40 368–371 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8415

    Bienfait, A., Satzinger, K.J., Zhong, Y.P., Chang, H.-S., Chou, M.-H., Conner, C.R., Dumur, ´E., Grebel, J., Peairs, G.A., Povey, R.G., Cleland, A.N.: Phonon- mediated quantum state transfer and remote qubit entanglement. Science364, 40 368–371 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8415

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaw8415 2019

  49. [51]

    Science358, 199–202 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao1511

    Chu, Y., Kharel, P., Renninger, W.H., Burkhart, L.D., Frunzio, L., Rakich, P.T., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits. Science358, 199–202 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao1511

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aao1511 2017

  50. [52]

    Nature604, 463–467 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04500-y

    Wollack, A.E.: Quantum state preparation and tomography of entangled mechanical resonators. Nature604, 463–467 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04500-y

    2022

  51. [53]

    Nature563, 666–670 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0717-7

    Chu, Y., Kharel, P., Yoon, T., Frunzio, L., Rakich, P.T., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Cre- ation and control of multi-phonon fock states in a bulk acoustic-wave resonator. Nature563, 666–670 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0717-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0717-7 2018

  52. [54]

    Applied Physics Letters117(15), 150503 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0021088

    Chu, Y., Gr¨ oblacher, S.: A perspective on hybrid quantum opto- and elec- tromechanical systems. Applied Physics Letters117(15), 150503 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0021088

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0021088 2020

  53. [55]

    Roy, A., Sarma, A.K.: Overcoming the standard quantum limit with an electro- optomechanical hybrid system for enhanced force sensing. Phys. Rev. A111, 013509 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.111.013509

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.013509 2025

  54. [56]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2511.21983

    Suri, N., Wang, Z., Roy, T., Venturelli, D., Jong, W.A.: Quantum Sensing using Geometrical Phase in Qubit-Oscillator Systems (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2511.21983

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [57]

    Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T.J., Marquardt, F.: Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391–1452 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86. 1391

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86 2014

  56. [58]

    Lebedew, P.: Untersuchungen ¨ uber die druckkr¨ afte des lichtes. Ann. Phys.311, 433–458 (1901) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19013111102

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19013111102 1901

  57. [59]

    Nichols, E.F., Hull, G.F.: A preliminary communication on the pressure of heat and light radiation. Phys. Rev.13, 307–320 (1901) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevSeriesI.13.307

    1901

  58. [60]

    Braginsky, V.B., Manukin, A.B.: Ponderomotive effects of electromagnetic radiation. Sov. Phys. JETP25, 653–655 (1967)

    1967

  59. [61]

    Braginsky, V.B.: Classical and quantum restrictions on the detection of weak disturbances of a macroscopic oscillator. Sov. Phys. JETP26, 831–834 (1968)

    1968

  60. [62]

    Caves, C.M.: Quantum-mechanical radiation-pressure fluctuations in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 75–79 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.45.75

    1980

  61. [63]

    41 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Braginsky, V.B., Khalili, F.Y., Thorne, K.S.: Quantum Measurement. 41 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511622748

    1995

  62. [64]

    Pace, A.F., Collett, M.J., Walls, D.F.: Quantum limits in interferometric detec- tion of gravitational radiation. Phys. Rev. A47, 3173–3189 (1993) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3173

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.47.3173 1993

  63. [65]

    Nature488, 476–480 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature11325

    Brooks, D.W.C., Botter, T., Schreppler, S., Purdy, T.P., Brahms, N., Stamper-Kurn, D.M.: Non-classical light generated by quantum-noise-driven cavity optomechanics. Nature488, 476–480 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature11325

    2012

  64. [67]

    Fabre, C., Pinard, M., Bourzeix, S., Heidmann, A., Giacobino, E., Reynaud, S.: Quantum-noise reduction using a cavity with a movable mirror. Phys. Rev. A 49, 1337–1343 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1337

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.49.1337 1994

  65. [68]

    Jacobs, K., Tombesi, P., Collett, M.J., Walls, D.F.: Quantum-nondemolition measurement of photon number using radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. A49, 1961– 1966 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1961

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.49.1961 1961

  66. [69]

    Heidmann, A., Hadjar, Y., Pinard, M.: Quantum nondemolition measurement by optomechanical coupling. Appl. Phys. B64, 173–180 (1997) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s003400050162

    work page doi:10.1007/s003400050162 1997

  67. [70]

    Mancini, S., Vitali, D., Tombesi, P.: Optomechanical cooling of a macroscopic oscillator by homodyne feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 688–691 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.688

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.688 1998

  68. [71]

    Bose, S., Jacobs, K., Knight, P.L.: Preparation of nonclassical states in cavities with a moving mirror. Phys. Rev. A56, 4175–4186 (1997) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.56.4175

    1997

  69. [72]

    Nature563(7729), 53–58 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0643-8

    Rossi, M., Mason, D., Chen, J., Tsaturyan, Y., Schliesser, A.: Measurement- based quantum control of mechanical motion. Nature563(7729), 53–58 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0643-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0643-8 2018

  70. [73]

    Matsumoto, N., Cata˜ no-Lopez, S.B., Sugawara, M., Suzuki, S., Abe, N., Komori, K., Michimura, Y., Aso, Y., Edamatsu, K.: Demonstration of displacement sensing of a mg-scale pendulum for mm- and mg-scale gravity measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 071101 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122. 071101 42

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122 2019

  71. [74]

    Khalili, F.Y., Polzik, E.S.: Overcoming the standard quantum limit in grav- itational wave detectors using spin systems with a negative effective mass. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 031101 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121. 031101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121 2018

  72. [75]

    Science344(6191), 1486–1489 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249850 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1249850

    Schreppler, S., Spethmann, N., Brahms, N., Botter, T., Barrios, M., Stamper- Kurn, D.M.: Optically measuring force near the standard quantum limit. Science344(6191), 1486–1489 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249850 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1249850

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1249850 2014

  73. [76]

    Caves, C.M., Thorne, K.S., Drever, R.W.P., Sandberg, V.D., Zimmermann, M.: On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a quantum-mechanical oscillator. i. issues of principle. Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 341–392 (1980) https:// doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.52.341

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.341 1980

  74. [77]

    ˇCernot´ ık, O., Hammerer, K.: Measurement-induced long-distance entanglement of superconducting qubits using optomechanical transducers. Phys. Rev. A94, 012340 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012340

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.012340 2016

  75. [78]

    Nature physics10, 321–326 (2014) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nphys2911

    Andrews, R.W., Peterson, R.W., Purdy, T.P., Cicak, K., Simmonds, R.W., Regal, C.A., Lehnert, K.W.: Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light. Nature physics10, 321–326 (2014) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nphys2911

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2911 2014

  76. [79]

    Nature communications6(1), 7606 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8606

    Gr¨ oblacher, S., Trubarov, A., Prigge, N., Cole, G.D., Aspelmeyer, M., Eisert, J.: Observation of non-markovian micromechanical brownian motion. Nature communications6(1), 7606 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8606

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms8606 2015

  77. [80]

    Nature478, 89–92 (2011) https://doi.org/10

    Chan, J., Alegre, T.P.M., Safavi-Naeini, A.H., Hill, J.T., Krause, A., Gr¨ oblacher, S., Aspelmeyer, M., Painter, O.: Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state. Nature478, 89–92 (2011) https://doi.org/10. 1038/nature10461

    2011

  78. [81]

    Barzanjeh, S., Xuereb, A., Gr¨ oblacher, S., Paternostro, M., Regal, C.A., Weig, E.M.: Optomechanics for quantum technologies. Nat. Phys.18, 15–24 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01402-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01402-0 2022

  79. [82]

    Nature520, 522–525 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14349

    Cohen, J.D., Meenehan, S.M., MacCabe, G.S., Gr¨ oblacher, S., Safavi-Naeini, A.H., Marsili, F., Shaw, M.D., Painter, O.: Phonon counting and intensity interferometry of a nanomechanical resonator. Nature520, 522–525 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14349

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14349 2015

  80. [83]

    Marinkovi´ c, I., Wallucks, A., Riedinger, R., Hong, S., Aspelmeyer, M., Gr¨ oblacher, S.: Optomechanical bell test. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 220404 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.220404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.220404 2018

Showing first 80 references.