arxiv: 2604.18273 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: unknown

Rapid and Predictive Planet Population Synthesis Model (RAPPS) I. Upgraded model and resulting synthetic populations

Tadahiro Kimura , Masahiro Ikoma

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP

keywords planet population synthesisexoplanet formationdynamical evolutionsemi-analytical modelatmospheric enrichmentgas giantssuper-EarthsN-body simulations

0 comments

The pith

An upgraded planet population synthesis model incorporates semi-analytical post-disc dynamics to produce higher abundances of Earth- and sub-Earth-mass planets in closer agreement with N-body simulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an enhanced planet population synthesis model called RAPPS to efficiently predict planetary masses, radii, orbits, and atmospheric properties across diverse stellar hosts. It extends prior work by adding a semi-analytical treatment of planet-planet interactions after the gas disc disperses, along with revised disc evolution, resonance trapping, and atmospheric escape prescriptions. This dynamical update mainly increases the predicted numbers of small rocky planets relative to earlier versions. Atmospheric water enrichment is shown to affect gas giant occurrence and the radii of close-in super-Earths and sub-Neptunes. The resulting framework remains fast enough to support large statistical comparisons with current and future exoplanet observations.

Core claim

The upgraded model, incorporating a semi-analytical treatment of post-disc dynamical evolution in multiplanet systems, produces planetary distributions that differ from previous results particularly in the higher abundance of Earth- and sub-Earth-mass planets, with these differences arising mainly from the new dynamical evolution model and showing improved agreement with simulations based on direct N-body integrations; atmospheric enrichment strongly influences both the occurrence of gas giants and the radius distribution of close-in super-Earths and sub-Neptunes.

What carries the argument

semi-analytical treatment of post-disc dynamical evolution in multiplanet systems, which statistically captures the outcomes of planet-planet interactions

If this is right

The model enables computationally efficient prediction of planetary masses, radii, orbits, and atmospheric properties across various stellar hosts for large parameter surveys.
Atmospheric enrichment via magma-gas interactions strongly affects gas giant occurrence rates.
Radius distributions of close-in super-Earths and sub-Neptunes are shaped by atmospheric processes.
Synthetic populations show improved fidelity to N-body results for dynamical outcomes after disc dispersal.
The framework supports robust statistical comparisons with observations from upcoming missions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The semi-analytical dynamical module could be tested against specific observed multiplanet systems to identify where resonance trapping prescriptions need refinement.
The predicted rise in Earth- and sub-Earth-mass planets may help interpret the radius valley and occurrence rates seen in current transit surveys.
This efficiency gain opens the possibility of running population synthesis across thousands of stellar metallicities or ages to map formation pathways.
Direct comparison of the model's atmospheric predictions with JWST or future spectroscopy data could constrain the magma-gas enrichment assumption.

Load-bearing premise

The semi-analytical treatment of post-disc dynamical evolution in multiplanet systems accurately captures the statistical outcomes of planet-planet interactions without requiring full N-body integration for every system.

What would settle it

A large ensemble of full N-body integrations for representative multiplanet systems drawn from the same initial conditions, followed by direct statistical comparison of the resulting planet mass and orbital distributions to the RAPPS output, would test whether the semi-analytical approximation holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18273 by Masahiro Ikoma, Tadahiro Kimura.

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Orbital and collisional evolution of planets in a planetary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Evolution of the mass and semi-major axis of planets in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Final distributions of planetary mass (top row) and radius (bottom row) versus semi-major axis for 5000 systems. Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Distribution of disc lifetimes in this study’s model (red) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Final distributions of simulated planets for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Comparison of occurrence rates by planet type between our simulation results (red and blue) and those from NGPPS (black), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Exoplanet surveys have revealed a wide diversity of planetary systems, requiring integrated models of planet formation to explain their origin. Planet population synthesis (PPS) modelling is a key tool for linking theory with the statistical properties of observed exoplanets. In the coming decade, the number of known exoplanets is expected to increase ten-fold, with a significant expansion in the range of planetary parameters probed by upcoming missions. We aim to develop a new PPS model capable of predicting planetary masses, radii, orbits, and atmospheric properties across diverse stellar hosts, while maintaining high computational efficiency for statistical comparison with observations. We build upon our previous model, which included water enrichment of primordial atmospheres via magma-gas interactions, and extend it by incorporating a semi-analytical treatment of post-disc dynamical evolution in multiplanet systems. Additional updates include revised prescriptions for disc evolution, resonance trapping, and atmospheric escape. The updated model produces planetary distributions that differ from our previous results, particularly in the abundance of Earth- and sub-Earth-mass planets. These differences arise mainly from the new dynamical evolution model and show improved agreement with simulations based on direct N-body integrations. Atmospheric enrichment is also found to strongly influence both the occurrence of gas giants and the radius distribution of close-in super-Earths and sub-Neptunes. The upgraded model provides a computationally efficient and physically comprehensive framework for predicting planetary populations across a wide range of stellar environments, enabling large parameter surveys and robust statistical comparisons with observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper upgrades their prior PPS model with a semi-analytical post-disc dynamical module that shifts the predicted abundance of Earth and sub-Earth mass planets and claims better N-body agreement, but supplies no quantitative metrics to support the claim.

read the letter

The upgraded model mainly stands out for its semi-analytical treatment of post-disc dynamical evolution in multiplanet systems. This addition, along with revised disc evolution, resonance trapping, and atmospheric escape, leads to different synthetic populations than their previous version, especially more or fewer Earth- and sub-Earth-mass planets. They report that this brings better agreement with direct N-body integrations, and that the water enrichment from magma-gas interactions still plays a key role in gas giant occurrence and the radii of close-in small planets. The work does a good job keeping the model fast. For population synthesis to be useful with the coming wave of exoplanet data, it has to run many realizations without getting bogged down in full dynamical simulations for every system. Building directly on their earlier code with the water treatment means the new results can be compared to what they published before. The main concern is the lack of detailed validation for the dynamical part. The claim of improved agreement with N-body rests on the new module, but the abstract gives no metrics such as distribution comparisons or specific rates of instabilities for low-mass planets. Without those, it's hard to see how well the approximation works across the parameter space. There is also the usual issue with revised prescriptions: some parameters are probably tuned, and the paper does not clearly separate what is predicted from what is adjusted to fit observations or earlier simulations. This is for modelers who do planet population synthesis or who want to use such models to understand occurrence rates from surveys. It deserves peer review because the changes are substantive enough to check, and the efficiency goal is practical.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an upgraded planet population synthesis (PPS) model called RAPPS that incorporates a semi-analytical treatment of post-disc dynamical evolution in multi-planet systems, along with revised prescriptions for disc evolution, resonance trapping, and atmospheric escape. Building on a previous model that included water enrichment, the new version produces synthetic populations with notably higher abundances of Earth- and sub-Earth-mass planets. These changes are attributed mainly to the dynamical evolution component and are claimed to show improved agreement with direct N-body simulations. The model also explores the impact of atmospheric enrichment on gas giant occurrence and the radius distribution of close-in super-Earths and sub-Neptunes, positioning it as an efficient tool for large-scale statistical comparisons with exoplanet observations.

Significance. If the semi-analytical dynamical model accurately reproduces the statistical outcomes of N-body integrations, this work offers a valuable computationally efficient alternative for generating large synthetic exoplanet populations across diverse stellar hosts. This is significant for preparing for the expected ten-fold increase in known exoplanets from upcoming surveys, allowing robust statistical tests of formation theories. The emphasis on atmospheric processes adds physical depth to the predictions for planetary radii and compositions.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Results): The claim that the new dynamical evolution model leads to 'improved agreement with simulations based on direct N-body integrations' lacks supporting quantitative evidence. No specific metrics, such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistics on the mass or period distributions, instability rates for multi-planet systems, or direct comparisons of final architectures for low-mass planets, are provided to substantiate the improvement.
[§3.2] §3.2 (Dynamical Evolution Model): The semi-analytical treatment of post-disc evolution is central to the reported shifts in Earth- and sub-Earth-mass planet abundances, yet its validation against N-body is only asserted rather than demonstrated with explicit tests across the relevant parameter space (e.g., for systems with 3-5 planets of ~1-10 Earth masses). This is load-bearing for the central claim.
[§2] §2 (Model Updates): The revised prescriptions for disc evolution, resonance trapping, and atmospheric escape introduce multiple free parameters. The manuscript should explicitly distinguish between parameters calibrated to match observations or prior simulations and those that are truly predictive, to address potential circularity in the reported agreements.

minor comments (2)

[Figure 5] Figure 5: The caption for the radius distribution plot could clarify the binning and error estimation method used for the synthetic populations.
[References] References: Several key papers on N-body simulations of planet formation appear to be missing from the reference list.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened with additional quantitative support and clarifications. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested revisions in the next version of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Results): The claim that the new dynamical evolution model leads to 'improved agreement with simulations based on direct N-body integrations' lacks supporting quantitative evidence. No specific metrics, such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistics on the mass or period distributions, instability rates for multi-planet systems, or direct comparisons of final architectures for low-mass planets, are provided to substantiate the improvement.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current version of the manuscript supports the claim of improved agreement primarily through qualitative descriptions and visual comparisons rather than quantitative statistical metrics. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit quantitative comparisons, including Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistics on the mass and period distributions, instability rates for multi-planet systems, and direct architecture comparisons for low-mass planets. These will be presented in an expanded Section 4, with corresponding updates to the abstract. revision: yes
Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Dynamical Evolution Model): The semi-analytical treatment of post-disc evolution is central to the reported shifts in Earth- and sub-Earth-mass planet abundances, yet its validation against N-body is only asserted rather than demonstrated with explicit tests across the relevant parameter space (e.g., for systems with 3-5 planets of ~1-10 Earth masses). This is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: We agree that the validation of the semi-analytical dynamical model requires more explicit demonstration. We will expand §3.2 to include targeted comparisons between the semi-analytical treatment and full N-body integrations for representative systems with 3-5 planets in the 1-10 Earth-mass range. These tests will quantify the fidelity of the approximation across the parameter space relevant to the synthetic populations and will be added as new figures or tables. revision: yes
Referee: [§2] §2 (Model Updates): The revised prescriptions for disc evolution, resonance trapping, and atmospheric escape introduce multiple free parameters. The manuscript should explicitly distinguish between parameters calibrated to match observations or prior simulations and those that are truly predictive, to address potential circularity in the reported agreements.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for greater transparency on parameter origins. In the revised §2 we will add a dedicated subsection and accompanying table that explicitly classifies every free parameter according to whether it is calibrated against observations, tuned to prior simulations, or derived from first principles. This classification will clarify the predictive aspects of the model and reduce any perception of circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents an upgraded planet population synthesis model incorporating a semi-analytical post-disc dynamical evolution treatment along with revised prescriptions for disc evolution, resonance trapping, and atmospheric escape. The central claims concern resulting shifts in planetary distributions (particularly Earth/sub-Earth abundances) and improved statistical agreement with N-body simulations. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work; the semi-analytical component is described as an independent modeling choice whose outputs are compared externally to N-body results. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on several updated sub-grid prescriptions whose functional forms and parameters are not independently derived in the abstract; the semi-analytical dynamical evolution is presented as a new module whose validity is checked against N-body but whose internal assumptions are not enumerated here.

free parameters (1)

parameters in revised disc evolution, resonance trapping, and atmospheric escape prescriptions
These are updated from prior work and implicitly calibrated to produce the reported population differences.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Semi-analytical post-disc dynamical evolution accurately reproduces statistical outcomes of full N-body integrations for multiplanet systems
Invoked to justify replacing direct integrations with a faster treatment.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1387 out tokens · 43073 ms · 2026-05-10T03:30:55.399821+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 298 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

doi:10.1086/172208 , journal =

work page doi:10.1086/172208
[2]

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/178 , eid =

2012 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/178 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1208.1760 , journal =

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/2/178 2012
[3]

doi:10.1016/S0031-9201(96)03229-3 , journal =

work page doi:10.1016/s0031-9201(96)03229-3
[4]

doi:10.1029/GM074p0041 , journal =

work page doi:10.1029/gm074p0041
[5]

, keywords =

1986 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1029/JB091iB13p0E291 , journal =

work page doi:10.1029/jb091ib13p0e291 1986
[6]

doi:10.1089/ast.2010.0545 , journal =

work page doi:10.1089/ast.2010.0545 2010
[7]

doi:10.1143/PTP.56.1756 , journal =

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.56.1756
[8]

doi:10.1086/421989 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1086/421989 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1086/421989
[9]

doi:10.1086/166144 , journal =

work page doi:10.1086/166144
[10]

doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6201 , journal =

work page doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6201 1999
[11]

L., et al

doi:10.3847/PSJ/abd022 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2010.01074 , journal =

work page doi:10.3847/psj/abd022 2010
[12]

2017 , bdsk-url-1 =

, keywords =. 2017 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2360 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2360 2017
[13]

doi:10.1086/175039 , journal =

work page doi:10.1086/175039
[14]

T., Drinkwater , M

, keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08786.x , eprint =

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08786.x 2005
[15]

doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01338.x , Eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01243.x , eprint =

work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01243.x 2012
[16]

T., Mellema, G., Pen, U.-L., et al

, keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10293.x , eprint =

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10293.x 2006
[17]

T., Mellema, G., Pen, U.-L., et al

, keywords =. 2006 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10294.x , eprint =

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10294.x 2006
[18]

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/989 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/989 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/704/2/989
[19]

doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2651 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2651 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2651
[20]

doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1272 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1272 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1272
[21]

arXiv , author =:1101.0513 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014760 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1101.0513 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014760
[22]

arXiv , author =:1610.03460 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629671 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1610.03460 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629671
[23]

arXiv , author =:1705.06008 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630051 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1705.06008 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630051
[24]

Alibert, C

, keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040053 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040053
[25]

2005, A&A, 434, 343, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042032

, keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042032 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042032
[26]

arXiv , author =:1901.09719 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834592 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1901.09719 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834592 1901
[27]

arXiv , author =:1311.3039 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322293 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1311.3039 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322293
[28]

Alibert, F

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321690 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1307.4864 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321690
[29]

doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0557-2 , eprint =

Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0557-2 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0557-2
[30]

, keywords =

, keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302
[31]

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1241 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1241 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/2/1241
[32]

M., Rosenfeld, K

2013 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/129 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1305.5262 , journal =

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/771/2/129 2013
[33]

J., Barnes, J., et al

, keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature19106 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1038/nature19106
[34]

P., van der Marel, N., et al

doi:10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/46 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1604.05719 , journal =

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/828/1/46
[35]

P., Trapman, L., et al

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab890 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1803.05923 , journal =

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab890
[36]

P., Manara C

doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa69c0 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1703.08546 , journal =

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa69c0
[37]

arXiv , author =:1310.6745 , journal =

doi:10.1088/2041-8205/778/1/L14 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1310.6745 , journal =

work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/778/1/l14 2041
[38]

doi:10.1086/173470 , journal =

work page doi:10.1086/173470
[39]

arXiv , author =:2102.08612 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038772 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2102.08612 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038772
[40]

arXiv , author =:1210.6661 , journal =

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/30 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1210.6661 , journal =

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/1/30
[41]

arXiv , author =:1511.06769 , journal =

doi:10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/152 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1511.06769 , journal =

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/152
[42]

arXiv , author =:1603.00484 , journal =

doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/80 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1603.00484 , journal =

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/2/80
[43]

2013 , pages =

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/76 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1301.0318 , journal =

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/76
[44]

The Astrophysical Journal , author =

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/96 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1305.7232 , journal =

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/96
[45]

The Astrophysical Journal , author =

1991 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1086/170270 , journal =

work page doi:10.1086/170270 1991
[46]

doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1 , journal =

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.1
[47]

arXiv , author =:astro-ph/9805009 , journal =

work page arXiv
[48]

New evolutionary models for pre-main sequence and main sequence low-mass stars down to the hydrogen-burning limit

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1503.04107 , journal =

work page Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481
[49]

doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1165 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1165 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1165
[50]

doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.10.024 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.10.024 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.10.024 2016
[51]

doi:10.1086/523667 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1086/523667 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1086/523667
[52]

arXiv , author =:2106.00688 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140699 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2106.00688 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140699
[53]

doi:10.1073/pnas.1304196111 , eprint =

Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304196111 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1304196111
[54]

M., Rowe , J

doi:10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1202.5852 , journal =

work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24
[55]

S., Aldering , G., et al

, keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06406.x , eprint =

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06406.x 2003
[56]

doi:10.1038/383139a0 , journal =

work page doi:10.1038/383139a0
[57]

doi:10.1086/161178 , journal =

work page doi:10.1086/161178
[58]

doi:10.1086/161179 , journal =

work page doi:10.1086/161179
[59]

R., & Lin, D

, keywords =. doi:10.1086/174206 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1086/174206
[60]

arXiv , author =:1101.3545 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015774 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1101.3545 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015774
[61]

doi:10.1038/nature14277 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature14277 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1038/nature14277
[62]

arXiv , author =:1801.07913 , journal =

doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab2ae , eid =. arXiv , author =:1801.07913 , journal =

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab2ae 2041
[63]

doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.02.012 , journal =

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.02.012 2008
[64]

2014 , bdsk-url-1 =

Protostars and Planets VI , date-added =. 2014 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch030 , editor =. arXiv , author =:1402.7086 , keywords =

work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch030 2014
[65]

doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1427 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1427 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1427
[66]

doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1870 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1870 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1870
[67]

doi:10.1093/mnras/stz738 , eprint =

, keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz738 , eprint =

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz738
[68]

2012, A&A, 539, A148, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118136

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118136 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1201.5781 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118136
[69]

arXiv , author =:1311.5222 , journal =

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/153 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1311.5222 , journal =

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/153
[70]

arXiv , author =:1104.2408 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016179 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1104.2408 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016179
[71]

Bitsch, W

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014414 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1008.2656 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014414
[72]

arXiv , author =:2104.11631 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140793 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2104.11631 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140793
[73]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834489 , eid =

2019 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834489 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1902.08771 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834489 2019
[74]

Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731931 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1801.02341 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731931
[75]

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60609-5_12 , editor =

Formation, Evolution, and Dynamics of Young Solar Systems , date-added =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60609-5_12 , editor =

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60609-5_12
[76]

arXiv , author =:1401.1334 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323007 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1401.1334 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323007
[77]

arXiv , author =:1408.1016 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424015 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1408.1016 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424015
[78]

Bitsch, M

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526463 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1507.05209 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526463
[79]

arXiv , author =:1411.3255 , journal =

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424964 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1411.3255 , journal =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424964
[80]

, keywords =

1986 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90122-3 , journal =

work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90122-3 1986

Showing first 80 references.