arxiv: 2604.18647 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Quantum-Deformed Phase-Space Geometry and Emergent Inflation in Effective Four-Dimensional Spacetime

Abdel Nasser Tawfik (Islamic U., Ahram Canadian U., Azzah A. Alshehri (Egyptian Ctr. Theor. Phys., Benha U.), Cairo, Egyptian Ctr. Theor. Phys.), Giza, Hafr El Batin), Hafr El Batin U., Madinah, Mahmoud Nasar (Egyptian Ctr. Theor. Phys., Saleh O. Allehabi (Islamic U. of Madinah), Swapnil Kumar Singh (BMS Bangalore)

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords quantum gravityphase-space deformationinflationary cosmologyFLRW metricHamilton geometrycosmological perturbationsemergent spacetimecotangent bundle

0 comments

The pith

Deforming the gravitational Hamiltonian on phase space produces an effective conformally modified FLRW metric that drives inflation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method to encode quantum gravity effects by deforming the gravitational Hamiltonian on the cotangent bundle using a scalar that depends on projective momentum directions and quantum phase-space properties. This deformation creates an anisotropic Hamilton geometry, and pulling back via a section produces an effective four-dimensional spacetime metric. In the homogeneous and isotropic case, this metric becomes a conformally deformed FLRW geometry controlled by a scalar deformation field. The approach then derives modified field equations and applies them to construct inflationary models, including slow-roll dynamics and perturbations. A sympathetic reader would care because it provides a systematic way to incorporate quantum effects into cosmological evolution without requiring a complete theory of quantum gravity.

Core claim

The construction starts on the cotangent bundle where the gravitational Hamiltonian is deformed by a zero-homogeneous scalar determined by projective momentum directions and quantum phase-space properties. This induces an anisotropic Hamilton geometry on a non-null conic domain, from which an effective spacetime metric is obtained through a section-pullback procedure. In the homogeneous and isotropic sector, the pullback reduces to a conformally deformed FLRW geometry governed by a scalar deformation field. The resulting framework derives modified Einstein, Klein-Gordon, geodesic-deviation, and Raychaudhuri equations, enabling the analysis of inflationary background dynamics, slow-roll, e-fh

What carries the argument

The section-pullback procedure applied to the anisotropic Hamilton geometry on the non-null conic domain, which reduces to a conformally deformed FLRW geometry governed by a scalar deformation field.

If this is right

Modified Einstein and Klein-Gordon equations include terms from the deformation scalar's time dependence.
The slow-roll parameters and number of e-folds receive corrections determined by the phase-space properties.
Perturbations can be quantized in the standard way after redefining the background.
The model establishes a direct connection between quantum-deformed phase-space geometry and four-dimensional inflationary cosmology.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the deformation scalar can be chosen to match specific quantum gravity models, the framework could reproduce known corrections in loop quantum cosmology or string cosmology.
The section-dependent emergence of the metric suggests that different observers or slicings might experience different effective spacetimes, which could be explored in inhomogeneous cosmologies.
Observational constraints on the deformation could come from precision measurements of the tensor-to-scalar ratio in the CMB.

Load-bearing premise

The section-pullback from the quantum-deformed anisotropic Hamilton geometry consistently produces a conformally deformed FLRW metric whose deformation is determined solely by projective momentum directions and quantum phase-space properties.

What would settle it

A calculation showing that the pullback metric in the homogeneous isotropic limit does not take the form of a conformally modified FLRW metric, or that the resulting inflationary predictions cannot be made consistent with current cosmological observations for any choice of the deformation scalar.

read the original abstract

A phase-space approach to quantum-deformed gravity is developed. Following its reduction to an effective four-dimensional spacetime structure, we utilize it in reanalyzing the cosmic inflationary dynamics and quantum gravity. The construction starts on cotangent bundle, where the gravitational Hamiltonian is deformed by a zero-homogeneous scalar determined by projective momentum directions and quantum phase-space properties. This induces an anisotropic Hamilton geometry on a non-null conic domain, from which an effective spacetime metric is obtained through a section-pullback procedure. In the homogeneous and isotropic sector, the pullback consistently reduces to a conformally deformed FLRW geometry governed by a scalar deformation field. We derive the corresponding modified Einstein, Klein-Gordon, geodesic-deviation, and Raychaudhuri equations. This allows for the construction of inflationary background dynamics, slow-roll regime, number of e-folds, as well as scalar and tensor perturbations. The resulting framework shows that leading inflationary corrections arise from the phase-space deformation and its time dependence, while the canonical quantization of cosmological perturbations remains standard after suitable background redefinitions. In this way, the model provides a covariant and controlled link between quantum-deformed phase-space geometry and effective four-dimensional inflationary dynamics. The present construction shows that effects of quantum gravity can be consistently encoded as a deformation of projective phase-space geometry, from which an effective spacetime metric emerges only after a section-dependent reduction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper builds a phase-space deformation to get effective inflation from quantum gravity geometry, but the pullback to conformal FLRW is asserted rather than shown in detail.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors deform the gravitational Hamiltonian on the cotangent bundle with a zero-homogeneous scalar set by projective momenta and quantum phase-space data. This produces anisotropic Hamilton geometry on a non-null conic domain, from which a section pullback yields an effective 4D metric. In the homogeneous isotropic sector that metric is claimed to be a conformally deformed FLRW, and the rest of the paper derives the modified Einstein, Klein-Gordon, geodesic-deviation, and Raychaudhuri equations from it. They then construct inflationary backgrounds, slow-roll parameters, e-fold counts, and scalar plus tensor perturbations, with the deformation supplying the leading corrections while perturbation quantization stays standard after background redefinitions. The central claim is that quantum-gravity effects can be encoded this way in a covariant manner that only becomes an effective spacetime after the section reduction. That sequence is new and not a routine extension of prior work. The paper does a solid job laying out the logical chain from the deformed geometry all the way to concrete inflationary observables and keeping the quantization piece conventional. The soft spot is exactly the pullback step. The abstract states that the procedure consistently reduces to a conformally deformed FLRW with the deformation scalar remaining zero-homogeneous and spatially homogeneous, yet it supplies no explicit calculation of the section choice or the demonstration that residual anisotropy vanishes in the isotropic limit. The stress-test concern is on target here: if the projective momentum dependence or the section introduces coordinate or directional dependence that survives, the modified equations do not follow from the geometry alone. Without seeing that derivation, the soundness of the central reduction is hard to judge. This is for specialists already working in quantum cosmology who are comfortable with phase-space and Hamilton geometry methods. It shows clear, honest engagement with the problem of linking quantum effects to effective 4D dynamics. I would send it to peer review so the authors can provide the missing pullback calculation and let referees check whether the symmetry really holds without extra constraints.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a phase-space approach to quantum-deformed gravity. It begins by deforming the gravitational Hamiltonian on the cotangent bundle with a zero-homogeneous scalar determined by projective momentum directions and quantum phase-space properties. This induces an anisotropic Hamilton geometry on a non-null conic domain. An effective four-dimensional spacetime metric is obtained via a section-pullback procedure. In the homogeneous and isotropic sector, the pullback reduces to a conformally deformed FLRW geometry governed by a scalar deformation field. From this, the authors derive modified Einstein, Klein-Gordon, geodesic-deviation, and Raychaudhuri equations, and apply the framework to construct inflationary background dynamics, the slow-roll regime, the number of e-folds, and scalar and tensor perturbations. The central claim is that leading inflationary corrections arise from the phase-space deformation while the canonical quantization of cosmological perturbations remains standard after suitable background redefinitions, thereby providing a covariant link between quantum-deformed phase-space geometry and effective four-dimensional inflationary dynamics.

Significance. If the central reduction and derivations hold, the work would provide a novel geometric encoding of quantum gravity effects as a deformation of projective phase-space geometry, from which an effective spacetime and modified inflationary dynamics emerge after a section-dependent reduction. A notable strength is the claim that perturbation quantization remains canonical after background redefinitions, which could offer a controlled interface between quantum gravity and standard cosmological perturbation theory. This approach might contribute to alternative frameworks for incorporating quantum corrections into cosmology, particularly if the time-dependent deformation leads to falsifiable predictions for inflationary observables.

major comments (2)

[Construction of the effective metric via section-pullback] The central claim requires that the section-pullback from the anisotropic Hamilton geometry on the non-null conic domain yields a metric exactly conformal to FLRW in the homogeneous isotropic sector, with the deformation scalar zero-homogeneous, spatially homogeneous, and depending only on projective momentum directions, time, and quantum phase-space data. The abstract asserts this consistency but does not exhibit the explicit pullback calculation, the choice of section, or the verification that no residual spatial anisotropy or coordinate dependence survives the isotropic limit. This step is load-bearing for all subsequent derivations of the modified equations and the inflationary analysis.
[Derivation of modified cosmological equations] The manuscript states that modified Einstein, Klein-Gordon, geodesic-deviation, and Raychaudhuri equations are derived from the conformally deformed FLRW geometry, yet supplies no explicit forms, consistency checks, or error estimates for these equations. Without these, it is not possible to verify that the modifications follow directly from the geometric construction rather than from additional assumptions on the deformation scalar.

minor comments (1)

The abstract is clearly written but would benefit from at least one reference to a specific equation or subsection when stating the reduction to the conformally deformed FLRW metric and the form of the modified equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. The major comments point to areas where additional detail will enhance the clarity and verifiability of our results. We provide point-by-point responses below and commit to revisions that address these concerns directly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Construction of the effective metric via section-pullback] The central claim requires that the section-pullback from the anisotropic Hamilton geometry on the non-null conic domain yields a metric exactly conformal to FLRW in the homogeneous isotropic sector, with the deformation scalar zero-homogeneous, spatially homogeneous, and depending only on projective momentum directions, time, and quantum phase-space data. The abstract asserts this consistency but does not exhibit the explicit pullback calculation, the choice of section, or the verification that no residual spatial anisotropy or coordinate dependence survives the isotropic limit. This step is load-bearing for all subsequent derivations of the modified equations and the inflationary analysis.

Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this critical aspect of the construction. While the manuscript describes the reduction in the homogeneous and isotropic sector leading to a conformally deformed FLRW geometry (as stated in the abstract and detailed in Section 3), we recognize that the explicit pullback calculation and verification steps were not presented in full detail. In the revised manuscript, we will include a dedicated subsection in Section 3 that provides the step-by-step pullback procedure, specifies the choice of the isotropic section, and demonstrates explicitly that the resulting metric is conformal to the standard FLRW form with no surviving spatial anisotropy or unwanted coordinate dependence. The zero-homogeneous nature of the deformation scalar and its dependence solely on projective momentum directions, time, and quantum phase-space data will be verified through direct computation. This expansion will ensure the foundation for all subsequent results is fully transparent. revision: yes
Referee: [Derivation of modified cosmological equations] The manuscript states that modified Einstein, Klein-Gordon, geodesic-deviation, and Raychaudhuri equations are derived from the conformally deformed FLRW geometry, yet supplies no explicit forms, consistency checks, or error estimates for these equations. Without these, it is not possible to verify that the modifications follow directly from the geometric construction rather than from additional assumptions on the deformation scalar.

Authors: We agree that explicit derivations are necessary to confirm the origin of the modifications. The paper derives these equations in Section 4 based on the conformally deformed metric, but the forms were summarized rather than fully expanded. In the revised version, we will add an appendix containing the complete explicit expressions for the modified Einstein equations, the Klein-Gordon equation for the scalar field, the geodesic deviation equation, and the Raychaudhuri equation. Additionally, we will provide consistency checks, including the recovery of the standard equations when the deformation vanishes, verification that the contracted Bianchi identities are satisfied, and perturbative error estimates associated with the deformation parameter. These additions will demonstrate that the modifications arise directly from the geometric construction without extraneous assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation proceeds from deformation to emergent metric without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper begins with an explicit zero-homogeneous deformation of the gravitational Hamiltonian on the cotangent bundle, induces anisotropic Hamilton geometry on the non-null conic domain, and obtains the effective 4D metric solely via the section-pullback procedure. In the homogeneous isotropic sector this is stated to reduce to a conformally deformed FLRW geometry whose scalar deformation field is determined by the projective momentum directions and quantum phase-space data. From this metric the modified Einstein, Klein-Gordon, geodesic-deviation and Raychaudhuri equations are derived, followed by the inflationary background, slow-roll parameters, e-fold number and perturbation spectra. The canonical quantization step is performed after background redefinitions and remains standard. None of these steps reduces by construction to a prior output; the deformation scalar is an input, the pullback is a geometric operation, and the cosmological quantities are computed forward from the resulting metric. No self-citation is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full manuscript details on parameters, axioms, and entities are unavailable.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard differential-geometric properties of the cotangent bundle and Hamilton geometry
Invoked to define the deformed Hamiltonian and the resulting anisotropic geometry on the non-null conic domain.

invented entities (1)

zero-homogeneous scalar deformation field no independent evidence
purpose: Deforms the gravitational Hamiltonian and induces the effective spacetime metric after pullback
Introduced as the object determined by projective momentum directions and quantum phase-space properties; no independent falsifiable handle is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5637 in / 1497 out tokens · 40354 ms · 2026-05-10T04:55:00.994199+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

The cosmological inflation model is therefore not defined directly on the anisotropic tensor˜gµν(x,p)

Inflaton Sector on Pullback and Conformal Geometries The inflationary matter sector must be formulated in a way consistent with the three geometric layers introduced in Section II: (a) the full anisotropic Hamilton metric˜gµν(x,p)on the conic phase-space domainA∗ 0⊂T∗M, (b) the section-pullback Lorentzian metric˜gσ µν(x) :=˜gµν(x,p(x)), and (c) the homoge...
[2]

Background Einstein and Klein–Gordon equations The total first-order effective action in the conformal cosmological sector is given as follows: ˜Sconf = ˜Sconf EH + ˜Sconf φ ,(176) where the reduced Einstein–Hilbert sector is derived from ˜Sconf EH = 1 16πG ∫ d4x√−g(1 +ϵ)R+O(ϵ2).(177) Becauseϵis treated as fixed background data in the reduced variational ...
[3]

The purpose of this section is to derive the slow-roll dynamics and the corresponding number of e-folds in the reduced conformal cosmological sector

Slow-Roll Regime and Number of e-Folds for Power-Law Potential We now specialize the background system derived in Section IIIA2 to a power-law inflaton potential, V(φ) =λφn, V ′(φ) =nλφn−1,(208) withλ>0andn>0. The purpose of this section is to derive the slow-roll dynamics and the corresponding number of e-folds in the reduced conformal cosmological secto...
[4]

Scalar and Tensor Perturbations on Effective FLRW Background We now consider perturbations of the effective conformal metric ˜gconf µν=Cg µν, C= 1 +ϵ,|ϵ|≪1,(236) whereg µνis the spatially flat FLRW background metric (190). The perturbation theory is understood as a theory of linearized cosmological fields propagating on the effective spacetime geometry ob...
[5]

Leta(t)∝tp andp>1, so that the background undergoes accelerated expansion

Power-Law Inflation and Time Dependence of Deformation It is useful to examine explicitly how the geometric deformation behaves in an inflationary background of power-law type. Leta(t)∝tp andp>1, so that the background undergoes accelerated expansion. Then the Hubble parameter reads H= p t, ˙H=−p t2,(257) and the Ricci scalar of the background FLRW metric...
[6]

Canonical Quantization of Cosmological Perturbations Wefinallyquantizethescalarandtensorperturbationsontheeffectiveconformalbackground. Thecentralstructural point is that the modular Hamilton–Finsler deformation enters the perturbation theory through the background pump fieldsz eff anda eff, not through a deformation of the equal-time canonical commutator...
[7]

Ryden,Introduction to Cosmology

B. Ryden,Introduction to Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2016

2016
[8]

Lemoine, J

M. Lemoine, J. Martin, and P. Peter,Inflationary Cosmology. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.https://books.google.com.sa/books?id=FlTHttO5fYYC

2007
[9]

Inflation in the universe,

J. D. Barrow and M. S. Turner, “Inflation in the universe,”Nature292(1981) 35–38

1981
[10]

Dynamics of the universe and spontaneous symmetry breaking,

D. Kazanas, “Dynamics of the universe and spontaneous symmetry breaking,”Astrophysical Journal241(Oct., 1980) L59–L63

1980
[11]

Chaotic inflation,

A. Linde, “Chaotic inflation,”Physics Letters B129no. 3, (1983) 177–181

1983
[12]

Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking,

A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48(Apr, 1982) 1220–1223

1982
[13]

Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,

A. H. Guth, “Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,”Phys. Rev. D23(Jan,
[14]

A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,

A. Linde, “A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,”Physics Letters B108no. 6, (1982) 389–393

1982
[15]

Determination of the phonon modes involved in the carrier-phonon interaction in silicon inversion layers at low temperatures by nonohmic transport measurements,

T. Neugebauer and G. Landwehr, “Determination of the phonon modes involved in the carrier-phonon interaction in silicon inversion layers at low temperatures by nonohmic transport measurements,”Phys. Rev. B21(Jan, 1980) 702–708

1980
[16]

First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the universe,

K. Sato, “First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the universe,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society195no. 3, (07, 1981) 467–479

1981
[17]

Inflation as the unique causal mechanism for generating density perturbations on scales well above the Hubble radius,

A. R. Liddle, “Inflation as the unique causal mechanism for generating density perturbations on scales well above the Hubble radius,”Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 5347–5351,arXiv:astro-ph/9410083

work page arXiv 1995
[18]

Galaxy formation and phonons,

G. V. Chibisov and V. F. Mukhanov, “Galaxy formation and phonons,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.200(1982) 535–550

1982
[19]

Production of phonons in an isotropic universe,

V. N. Lukash, “Production of phonons in an isotropic universe,”Sov. Phys. JETP52(1980) 807–814

1980
[20]

Guth,The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins

A. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins. Vintage, 1998. https://books.google.com.eg/books?id=Jz7eR4wu9hEC

1998
[21]

A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,

A. Starobinsky, “A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,”Physics Letters B91no. 1, (1980) 99–102

1980
[22]

Flrw cosmology with horava-lifshitz gravity: Impacts of equations of state,

A. Tawfik and E. Abou El Dahab, “Flrw cosmology with horava-lifshitz gravity: Impacts of equations of state,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics56(2017) 2122–2139

2017
[23]

INFLATION FROM QUANTUM GRAVITY,

T. Padmanabhan, “INFLATION FROM QUANTUM GRAVITY,”Phys. Lett. A104(1984) 196–199

1984
[24]

Tsamis and R.P

N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, “Quantum gravity slows inflation,”Nucl. Phys. B474(1996) 235–248, arXiv:hep-ph/9602315

work page arXiv 1996
[25]

The emergent universe: Inflationary cosmology with no singularity,

G. F. R. Ellis and R. Maartens, “The emergent universe: Inflationary cosmology with no singularity,”Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004) 223–232,arXiv:gr-qc/0211082

work page arXiv 2004
[26]

Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,

A. Einstein, “Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,”Sitzung der physikalisch-mathematischen Klasse(1915) 844–847. http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/MPIWG:ZZB2HK6W

1915
[27]

Classical General Relativity Derived from Quantum Gravity,

D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, “Classical General Relativity Derived from Quantum Gravity,”Annals Phys.89(1975) 193

1975
[28]

General very special relativity is Finsler geometry,

G. Gibbons, J. Gomis, and C. Pope, “General very special relativity is Finsler geometry,”Phys.Rev.D76(2007) 081701,arXiv:0707.2174 [hep-th]. 40

work page arXiv 2007
[29]

Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen,

B. Riemann, “Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen,”Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen13(1868) 133–150. http://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/riemann_hypothesen_1867
[30]

On the hypotheses which lie at the bases of geometry,

B. Riemann, “On the hypotheses which lie at the bases of geometry,”Nature8(1873) 14–17
[31]

Finsler,Über Kurven und Flächen in allgemeinen Räumen

P. Finsler,Über Kurven und Flächen in allgemeinen Räumen. PhD thesis, Georg-August Universität zu Göttingen, 1918

1918
[32]

Bao, S.-S

D. Bao, S.-S. Chern, and Z. Shen,An Introduction to Finsler-Riemann Geometry. Springer, New York, 2000

2000
[33]

Miron and I

R. Miron and I. Bucataru,Finsler Lagrange geometry. Editura Academiei Romane, 2007

2007
[34]

G. S. Asanov,Finsler Geometry, Relativity and Gauge Theories. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985

1985
[35]

Finsler spacetime geometry in Physics,

C. Pfeifer, “Finsler spacetime geometry in Physics,”Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.16no. supp02, (2019) 1941004, arXiv:1903.10185 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[36]

Fermat’s variational principle for anisotropic inhomogeneous media,

V. Cerveny, “Fermat’s variational principle for anisotropic inhomogeneous media,”Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica46 (2002) 567

2002
[37]

Relation of the wave-propagation metric tensor to the curvatures of the slowness and ray- velocity surfaces,

L. Klimes, “Relation of the wave-propagation metric tensor to the curvatures of the slowness and ray- velocity surfaces,” Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica46(2002) 589

2002
[38]

A finsler geodesic spray paradigm for wildfire spread modelling,

S. Markvorsen, “A finsler geodesic spray paradigm for wildfire spread modelling,”Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications28(2016) 208 – 228

2016
[39]

Finsler geometry of seismic ray path in anisotropic media,

T. Yajima and H. Nagahama, “Finsler geometry of seismic ray path in anisotropic media,”Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences465no. 2106, (2009) 1763–1777

2009
[40]

Perlick,Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle, and Applications to General Relativity

V. Perlick,Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle, and Applications to General Relativity. No. 61 in Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Berlin, 2000

2000
[41]

Linear pre-metric electrodynamics and deduction of the light cone,

G. F. Rubilar, “Linear pre-metric electrodynamics and deduction of the light cone,”Annalen Phys.11(2002) 717–782, arXiv:0706.2193 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2002
[42]

Finsler spaces and the underlying geometry of space-time,

R. Tavakol and N. Van Den Bergh, “Finsler spaces and the underlying geometry of space-time,”Physics Letters A112 no. 1, (1985) 23 – 25

1985
[43]

Viability criteria for the theories of gravity and finsler spaces,

R. K. Tavakol and N. Van den Bergh, “Viability criteria for the theories of gravity and finsler spaces,”General Relativity and Gravitation18no. 8, (1986) 849 – 859

1986
[44]

Classical Lagrangians and Finsler structures for the nonminimal fermion sector of the Standard-Model Extension,

M. Schreck, “Classical Lagrangians and Finsler structures for the nonminimal fermion sector of the Standard-Model Extension,”Phys. Rev.D93no. 10, (2016) 105017,arXiv:1512.04299 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[45]

Classical kinematics for Lorentz violation,

A. V. Kostelecky and N. Russell, “Classical kinematics for Lorentz violation,”Phys. Lett.B693(2010) 443–447, arXiv:1008.5062 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[46]

Gravity, Lorentz Violation, and the Standard Model

V. A. Kostelecky, “Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,”Phys. Rev.D69(2004) 105009, arXiv:hep-th/0312310 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2004
[47]

Riemann-Finsler geometry and Lorentz-violating kinematics,

A. Kostelecky, “Riemann-Finsler geometry and Lorentz-violating kinematics,”Phys. Lett.B701(2011) 137–143, arXiv:1104.5488 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2011
[48]

A viable model of locally anisotropic space-time and the finslerian generalization of the relativity theory,

G. Bogoslovsky, “A viable model of locally anisotropic space-time and the finslerian generalization of the relativity theory,”Fortschritte der Physik/Progress of Physics42no. 2, (1994) 143–193

1994
[49]

A special-relativistic theory of the locally anisotropic space-time,

G. Bogoslovsky, “A special-relativistic theory of the locally anisotropic space-time,”Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 1140 (1977) 99

1977
[50]

Geometry of physical dispersion relations,

D. Raetzel, S. Rivera, and F. P. Schuller, “Geometry of physical dispersion relations,”Phys.Rev.D83(2011) 044047, arXiv:1010.1369 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2011
[51]

Realization of doubly special relativistic symmetries in Finsler geometries,

G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Barcaroli, G. Gubitosi, S. Liberati, and N. Loret, “Realization of doubly special relativistic symmetries in Finsler geometries,”Phys. Rev.D90no. 12, (2014) 125030,arXiv:1407.8143 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[52]

Reaching the Planck scale with muon lifetime measurements,

I. P. Lobo and C. Pfeifer, “Reaching the Planck scale with muon lifetime measurements,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 10, (2021) 106025,arXiv:2011.10069 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

Finsler geometry as a model for relativistic gravity,

C. Lammerzahl and V. Perlick, “Finsler geometry as a model for relativistic gravity,”International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics15no. supp01, (2018) 1850166.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887818501669

work page doi:10.1142/s0219887818501669 2018
[54]

A Finsler generalisation of Einstein’s vacuum field equations,

S. F. Rutz, “A Finsler generalisation of Einstein’s vacuum field equations,”General Relativity and Gravitation25(1993) 1139

1993
[55]

Finsler geometric extension of Einstein gravity,

C. Pfeifer and M. N. R. Wohlfarth, “Finsler geometric extension of Einstein gravity,”Phys. Rev.D85(2012) 064009, arXiv:1112.5641 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2012
[56]

Relativistic kinetic gases as direct sources of gravity,

M. Hohmann, C. Pfeifer, and N. Voicu, “Relativistic kinetic gases as direct sources of gravity,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 2, (2020) 024062,arXiv:1910.14044 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

The connections of pseudo-Finsler spaces,

E. Minguzzi, “The connections of pseudo-Finsler spaces,”Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.11no. 07, (2014) 1460025, arXiv:1405.0645 [math-ph]. [Erratum: Int.J.Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys. 12, 1592001 (2015)]

work page arXiv 2014
[58]

Indefinite Finsler spaces and timelike spaces,

J. K. Beem, “Indefinite Finsler spaces and timelike spaces,”Can. J. Math.22(1970) 1035

1970
[59]

Causal structure and electrodynamics on Finsler spacetimes,

C. Pfeifer and M. N. R. Wohlfarth, “Causal structure and electrodynamics on Finsler spacetimes,”Phys.Rev.D84 (2011) 044039,arXiv:1104.1079 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[60]

Light cones in Finsler spacetime,

E. Minguzzi, “Light cones in Finsler spacetime,”Commun. Math. Phys.334no. 3, (2015) 1529–1551,arXiv:1403.7060 [math-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[61]

On the definition and examples of cones and Finsler spacetimes,

M. A. Javaloyes and M. Sánchez, “On the definition and examples of cones and Finsler spacetimes,”arXiv:1805.06978 [math.DG]

work page arXiv
[62]

Finsler gravity action from variational completion,

M. Hohmann, C. Pfeifer, and N. Voicu, “Finsler gravity action from variational completion,”Phys. Rev.D100no. 6, (2019) 064035,arXiv:1812.11161 [gr-qc]. 41

work page arXiv 2019
[63]

Foundations of Finsler Spacetimes from the Observers’ Viewpoint,

A. Bernal, M. A. Javaloyes, and M. Sánchez, “Foundations of Finsler Spacetimes from the Observers’ Viewpoint,” Universe6no. 4, (2020) 55,arXiv:2003.00455 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[64]

Short distance versus long distance physics: The Classical limit of the minimal length uncertainty relation,

S. Benczik, L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, S. Rayyan, and T. Takeuchi, “Short distance versus long distance physics: The Classical limit of the minimal length uncertainty relation,”Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 026003, arXiv:hep-th/0204049

work page arXiv 2002
[65]

Todorinov,Relativistic Generalized Uncertainty Principle and Its Implications

V. Todorinov,Relativistic Generalized Uncertainty Principle and Its Implications. PhD thesis, Lethbridge U., 2020. arXiv:2108.04322 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[66]

Y. C. Xun,Generalized Uncertainty Principle and its Applications. PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2014

2014
[67]

Timelike geodesic congruence in the simplest solutions of general relativity with quantum-improved metric tensor,

A. Tawfik and T. F. Dabash, “Timelike geodesic congruence in the simplest solutions of general relativity with quantum-improved metric tensor,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32no. 15, (2023) 2350097

2023
[68]

Discretized Finsler Structure: An Approach to Quantizing the First Fundamental Form,

A. N. Tawfik, “Discretized Finsler Structure: An Approach to Quantizing the First Fundamental Form,”Phys. Sci. Forum7no. 1, (2023) 36

2023
[69]

Vacuum homogeneous and nonhomogeneous metrics with conventional and quantized metric tensor: Singular or nonsingular solution,

A. Tawfik, S. G. Elgendi, and M. Hanafy, “Vacuum homogeneous and nonhomogeneous metrics with conventional and quantized metric tensor: Singular or nonsingular solution,”Annals Phys.480(2025) 170127,arXiv:2506.08254 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[70]

Expansion evolution of nonhomogeneous metric with quantum-mechanically revisited fundamental metric tensor,

A. N. Tawfik, A. A. Alshehri, and A. Pasqua, “Expansion evolution of nonhomogeneous metric with quantum-mechanically revisited fundamental metric tensor,”Nucl. Phys. B1015(2025) 116893,arXiv:2504.02001 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[71]

Einstein-Gilbert-Straus solution of Einstein field equations: Timelike geodesic congruence with conventional and quantized fundamental metric tensor,

A. N. Tawfik, T. F. Dabash, T. S. Amer, and M. O. Shaker, “Einstein-Gilbert-Straus solution of Einstein field equations: Timelike geodesic congruence with conventional and quantized fundamental metric tensor,”Nucl. Phys. B 1014(2025) 116866

2025
[72]

Quantum-induced revisiting spacetime curvature in relativistic regime,

A. N. Tawfik, F. T. Farouk, F. S. Tarabia, and M. Maher, “Quantum-induced revisiting spacetime curvature in relativistic regime,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39no. 35, (2024) 2443016

2024
[73]

Quantum geometric perspective on the origin of quantum-conditioned curvatures,

A. Nasser Tawfik, A. Pasqua, M. Waqas, A. A. Alshehri, and P. Kr Haldar, “Quantum geometric perspective on the origin of quantum-conditioned curvatures,”Class. Quant. Grav.41no. 19, (2024) 195018

2024
[74]

Born reciprocity and discretized Finsler structure: An approach to quantize GR curvature tensors on three-sphere,

A. N. Tawfik and T. F. Dabash, “Born reciprocity and discretized Finsler structure: An approach to quantize GR curvature tensors on three-sphere,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32no. 10, (2023) 2350068

2023
[75]

Born reciprocity and relativistic generalized uncertainty principle in Finsler structure: Fundamental tensor in discretized curved spacetime,

A. N. Tawfik and T. F. Dabash, “Born reciprocity and relativistic generalized uncertainty principle in Finsler structure: Fundamental tensor in discretized curved spacetime,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32no. 09, (2023) 2350060

2023
[76]

Cosmological Finsler Spacetimes,

M. Hohmann, C. Pfeifer, and N. Voicu, “Cosmological Finsler Spacetimes,”Universe6no. 5, (2020) 65, arXiv:2003.02299 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[77]

A theorem of stone and von neumann,

G. Mackey, “A theorem of stone and von neumann,”Duke Mathematical Journal16(1949) 313–326

1949
[78]

Imprimitivity for representations of locally compact groups, i,

G. Mackey, “Imprimitivity for representations of locally compact groups, i,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences35(1949) 537–545

1949
[79]

Induced representations of locally compact groups, i,

G. Mackey, “Induced representations of locally compact groups, i,”Annals of Mathematics55no. 2, (1952) 101–139

1952
[80]

Unitary representations of group extensions, i,

G. Mackey, “Unitary representations of group extensions, i,”Acta Mathematica99(1958) 265–311

1958

Showing first 80 references.