arxiv: 2604.18669 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Hawking area law in quantum gravity

Gianluca Calcagni

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th

keywords Hawking area lawquantum gravityblack hole mergersLIGO-Virgo-KAGRAStelle gravitynonlocal gravityblack hole entropyfractal black holes

0 comments

The pith

If the Hawking area law holds exactly for LVK black hole mergers, only specific quantum gravity models and black hole types remain viable.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that assuming the Hawking area law is exact for black hole mergers detected by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA has strong implications for quantum gravity. Observed mergers can arise in local Stelle gravity or nonlocal theories with entire or fractional form factors, but only via singular Ricci-flat black holes or regular classical black holes that satisfy narrow conditions. Those conditions require the absence of R squared and Riemann squared terms in the action, no extra real poles in the graviton propagator, and positivity of its spectral representation. The same assumption also yields the standard black hole entropy-area relation and supplies a concrete construction for Barrow's fractal black holes. A reader would care because this turns one observational fact into a filter that cuts through many competing approaches to quantum gravity.

Core claim

The central claim is that postulating an exact Hawking area law for the LVK-observed mergers implies that these events are produced in local Stelle gravity and in nonlocal quantum-gravity theories with entire or fractional form factors either by singular Ricci-flat black holes or by regular classical black holes only under very restrictive conditions: absence of R^2 and (Riemann)^2 terms in the action, absence of extra real poles in the graviton propagator, and positivity of its spectral representation. The paper proves that the classical standard black-hole entropy-area law follows directly from the Hawking area law and gives a rigorous realization of Barrow's fractal black holes.

What carries the argument

The exact Hawking area law used as a selection rule that forces restrictions on curvature terms in the action and on poles in the graviton propagator.

If this is right

Observed mergers must be produced by singular Ricci-flat black holes or by regular ones only when the listed restrictions on the action and propagator hold.
The standard entropy-area law for black holes is recovered as a direct consequence.
Barrow's fractal black holes receive a precise realization consistent with the area law.
The allowed theories are narrowed to local Stelle gravity and nonlocal models with entire or fractional form factors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future high-precision waveform data could check whether the spectral representation remains positive across the observed mass range.
If regular black holes are confirmed by other means, the absence of quadratic curvature terms would become an observational requirement rather than a theoretical choice.
The same area-law filter might be applied to other horizon types, such as cosmological horizons, to test consistency across different spacetimes.

Load-bearing premise

The Hawking area law applies exactly to the observed LVK mergers without further quantum corrections that would change the area relation.

What would settle it

A merger event whose final horizon area deviates measurably from the sum of the initial areas, or a gravitational-wave signal that reveals extra real poles in the propagator.

read the original abstract

We show that the LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA (LVK) verification of Hawking area law carries profound consequences for quantum gravity if such a law is postulated to hold exactly. The observed mergers can be produced in local Stelle gravity and in nonlocal quantum-gravity theories with entire or fractional form factors either by (i) singular Ricci-flat black holes or (ii) possibly regular classical black holes under very restrictive conditions: absence of $R^2$ and (Riemann)${}^2$ terms in the action, absence of extra real poles in the graviton propagator, and positivity of its spectral representation. To date, this is the strongest simplification of the ambiguities of this class of theories. We also prove that the classical standard black-hole entropy-area law holds as a consequence of Hawking area law, and provide a rigorous realization of Barrow's fractal black holes otherwise.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Postulating an exact Hawking area law for LVK mergers forces tight restrictions on quantum gravity actions and propagators, but the data only supports it approximately.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper assumes the Hawking area law holds exactly for the observed black hole mergers and works out the consequences for a class of quantum gravity theories. It concludes that the events can arise in local Stelle gravity or in nonlocal models with entire or fractional form factors, but only when the action has no R squared or Riemann squared terms, the graviton propagator has no extra real poles, and its spectral representation is positive. It also derives the standard black hole entropy-area law directly from the area law and gives an explicit construction of Barrow fractal black holes. These steps are new in how they tie the LVK data to specific simplifications of the theory space. The derivation of the entropy law from the area law is direct and the listed conditions on the action and propagator are stated clearly enough to be checked in other models. The approach turns an observational claim into usable limits on higher-derivative and nonlocal terms. The soft spot is the exactness assumption. Gravitational wave signals have finite precision on masses and spins, so the area law is only verified within uncertainties. Small violations or extra quantum effects during merger remain compatible with the data and would relax the restrictions on the allowed terms and poles. The paper frames its results as conditional on exactness, which is honest, but that condition carries most of the weight. This work is aimed at researchers building and constraining modified gravity models. A reader who wants concrete ways to use existing merger data to cut down form-factor freedom will find the conditions worth testing. The logic is straightforward and the claims are falsifiable in principle, so the paper deserves a serious referee who can examine the derivations and the handling of observational errors. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that postulating the exact validity of the Hawking area law for LVK-observed black hole mergers imposes profound constraints on quantum gravity, allowing such mergers to arise in local Stelle gravity or nonlocal theories with entire/fractional form factors only via singular Ricci-flat black holes or regular ones under restrictive conditions (absence of R² and (Riemann)² terms, no extra real poles in the graviton propagator, and positive spectral representation). It further proves that the classical entropy-area law follows from the Hawking area law and provides a rigorous realization of Barrow's fractal black holes.

Significance. If the postulate of exact area-law validity holds, the work delivers the strongest simplification to date of the ambiguities in this class of local and nonlocal quantum-gravity theories by deriving concrete restrictions on action terms and propagators from gravitational-wave data. The rigorous derivation of the entropy-area law and the explicit construction realizing Barrow's fractal black holes are clear strengths that add technical value.

major comments (2)

[Introduction / §2 (LVK verification discussion)] The central claim that the LVK mergers impose 'very restrictive conditions' (absence of R² and (Riemann)² terms, no extra real poles, positive spectral representation) is load-bearing and rests on the exact (not approximate) validity of the area law. The manuscript should explicitly address in the introduction or §2 how finite signal-to-noise ratios and parameter-estimation uncertainties in the LVK data affect the strength of these restrictions, since small violations consistent with observations could relax the allowed form factors.
[Discussion / concluding section] The statement that this constitutes 'the strongest simplification of the ambiguities of this class of theories' requires a concrete comparison (e.g., to existing constraints from unitarity, causality, or other observations) to be load-bearing; without it the claim remains qualitative.

minor comments (2)

[§3] Notation for the entire and fractional form factors should be introduced with a single consistent definition early in the text rather than piecemeal.
[Introduction] A brief remark on the relation between the postulated exact area law and possible quantum corrections during the merger phase would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and indicate planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Introduction / §2 (LVK verification discussion)] The central claim that the LVK mergers impose 'very restrictive conditions' (absence of R² and (Riemann)² terms, no extra real poles in the graviton propagator, and positivity of its spectral representation) is load-bearing and rests on the exact (not approximate) validity of the area law. The manuscript should explicitly address in the introduction or §2 how finite signal-to-noise ratios and parameter-estimation uncertainties in the LVK data affect the strength of these restrictions, since small violations consistent with observations could relax the allowed form factors.

Authors: We agree that the restrictions we derive are conditional on the exact validity of the Hawking area law, which is a theoretical postulate rather than a direct observational proof. Current LVK data are consistent with the area law within measurement uncertainties, but finite SNR and parameter-estimation errors allow for small deviations. We will add a clarifying paragraph in the introduction and §2 stating that the derived constraints on the action terms, propagator poles, and spectral representation hold under the exact-area-law assumption, while noting that future higher-precision observations could test or relax these conditions. This revision will make the scope of the claims explicit without altering the core results. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion / concluding section] The statement that this constitutes 'the strongest simplification of the ambiguities of this class of theories' requires a concrete comparison (e.g., to existing constraints from unitarity, causality, or other observations) to be load-bearing; without it the claim remains qualitative.

Authors: We acknowledge that the phrasing 'the strongest simplification' is qualitative in the current draft. While unitarity and causality already impose restrictions (e.g., ghost-free conditions and no superluminal modes), they still permit a broad family of entire and fractional form factors. Our derivation adds an observational layer by requiring Ricci-flat or highly restricted regular solutions from LVK data. To address the comment, we will insert a short comparative paragraph in the concluding section, contrasting our constraints with those from unitarity (which allow extra poles if residues are adjusted) and causality bounds. We will revise the wording to 'provides one of the strongest simplifications to date from observational input' to ensure the claim is substantiated. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation conditional on external postulate of exact area law

full rationale

The paper explicitly postulates that the Hawking area law holds exactly for LVK mergers and then derives restrictions on the allowed form factors, poles, and higher-curvature terms in nonlocal and Stelle gravity. This is a conditional implication (if exact area law, then these constraints), not a reduction of the output to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. The additional claim that the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy-area relation follows from the area theorem is presented as a separate proof step whose validity can be checked independently of the LVK data. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a prior self-citation or to a renaming of the input; the central argument remains self-contained against external benchmarks once the postulate is granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on the domain assumption that the Hawking area law holds exactly; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are identifiable from the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Hawking area law holds exactly
Explicitly postulated to hold exactly for the LVK mergers to derive the constraints.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5434 in / 1331 out tokens · 47333 ms · 2026-05-10T04:31:25.047530+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

175 extracted references · 161 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

[1]

Bambi, L

C. Bambi, L. Modesto and I.L. Shapiro (eds.),Handbook of Quantum Gravity, Springer, Singapore (2024)

2024
[2]

Damour and K

T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt,Tensor-scalar cosmologi- cal models and their relaxation toward general relativity, Phys. Rev. D48, 3436 (1993)

1993
[3]

Testing Scalar-Tensor Gravity with Gravitational-Wave Observations of Inspiralling Compact Binaries

C.M. Will,Testing scalar-tensor gravity with gravita- tional wave observations of inspiraling compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D50, 6058 (1994) [gr-qc/9406022]

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[4]

Ryan,Accuracy of estimating the multipole mo- ments of a massive body from the gravitational waves of a binary inspiral,Phys

F.D. Ryan,Accuracy of estimating the multipole mo- ments of a massive body from the gravitational waves of a binary inspiral,Phys. Rev. D56, 1845 (1997)

1997
[5]

Will,Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries,Phys

C.M. Will,Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries,Phys. Rev. D57, 2061 (1998) [gr-qc/9709011]

work page arXiv 2061
[6]

Gravitational-wave ve rsus binary-pulsar tests of strong-ﬁeld gravity

T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farèse,Gravitational wave versus binary-pulsar tests of strong field gravity,Phys. Rev. D58, 042001 (1998) [gr-qc/9803031]

work page arXiv 1998
[7]

Amelino-Camelia,An interferometric gravitational wave detector as a quantum gravity apparatus,Nature 398, 216 (1998) [gr-qc/9808029]

G. Amelino-Camelia,An interferometric gravitational wave detector as a quantum gravity apparatus,Nature 398, 216 (1998) [gr-qc/9808029]

work page arXiv 1998
[8]

Ng and H

Y.J. Ng and H. Van Dam,Measuring the foaminess of space-time with gravity-wave interferometers,Found. Phys.30, 795 (2000) [gr-qc/9906003]

work page arXiv 2000
[9]

Scharre and C.M

P.D. Scharre and C.M. Will,Testing scalar tensor grav- ity using space gravitational wave interferometers,Phys. Rev. D65, 042002 (2002) [gr-qc/0109044]

work page arXiv 2002
[10]

Black Hole Spectroscopy: Testing General Relativity through Gravitational Wave Observations

O. Dreyer, B.J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L.S. Finn, D. Gar- rison, and R. Lopez-Aleman,Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general relativity through gravitational wave ob- servations,Classical Quantum Gravity21, 787 (2004) [gr-qc/0309007]

work page Pith review arXiv 2004
[11]

Collins and S.A

N.A. Collins and S.A. Hughes,Towards a formalism for mapping the space-times of massive compact objects: Bumpy black holes and their orbits,Phys. Rev. D69, 124022 (2004) [gr-qc/0402063]

work page arXiv 2004
[12]

Will and N

C.M. Will and N. Yunes,Testing alternative theories of gravity using LISA,Classical Quantum Gravity21, 4367 (2004) [gr-qc/0403100]

work page arXiv 2004
[13]

Golden Binary Gravitational-Wave Sources: Robust Probes of Strong-Field Gravity

S.A. Hughes and K. Menou,Golden binaries for LISA: Robust probes of strong-field gravity,Astrophys. J.623, 689 (2005) [astro-ph/0410148]

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[14]

Testing general relativity a nd probing the merger history of massive black holes with LISA

E. Berti, A. Buonanno, and C.M. Will,Testing gen- eral relativity and probing the merger history of massive black holes with LISA,Classical Quantum Gravity22, S943 (2005) [gr-qc/0504017]

work page arXiv 2005
[15]

On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA

E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C.M. Will,On gravitational- wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,Phys. Rev. D73, 064030 (2006) [gr-qc/0512160]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[16]

Alexander, L.S

S. Alexander, L.S. Finn, and N. Yunes,Gravitational- wave probe of effective quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D 78, 066005 (2008) [arXiv:0712.2542]

work page arXiv 2008
[17]

Schutz, J

B.F. Schutz, J. Centrella, C. Cutler, and S.A. Hughes, Will Einstein have the last word on gravity?, arXiv:0903.0100

work page arXiv
[18]

Prob- ing nontensorial polarizations of stochastic gravitational-wave ba ckgrounds with ground- based laser interferometers

A. Nishizawa, A. Taruya, K. Hayama, S. Kawamura, and M. a. Sakagami,Probing non-tensorial polariza- tions of stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds with ground-based laser interferometers,Phys. Rev. D79, 082002 (2009) [arXiv:0903.0528]

work page arXiv 2009
[19]

Bounding the mass of the graviton with gravitational waves: eﬀect of higher harmonics in gravitational waveform templates

K.G. Arun and C.M. Will,Bounding the mass of the graviton with gravitational waves: Effect of higher har- monics in gravitational waveform templates,Classical Quantum Gravity26, 155002 (2009) [arXiv:0904.1190]

work page arXiv 2009
[20]

Sopuerta and N

C.F. Sopuerta and N. Yunes,Extreme and intermediate- mass ratio inspirals in dynamical Chern–Simons mod- ified gravity,Phys. Rev. D80, 064006 (2009) [arXiv:0904.4501]

work page arXiv 2009
[21]

Stavridis and C.M

A. Stavridis and C.M. Will,Bounding the mass of the graviton with gravitational waves: Effect of spin preces- sions in massive black hole binaries,Phys. Rev. D80, 044002 (2009) [arXiv:0906.3602]

work page arXiv 2009
[22]

Yagi and T

K. Yagi and T. Tanaka,Constraining alternative the- ories of gravity by gravitational waves from precessing eccentric compact binaries with LISA,Phys. Rev. D 81, 064008 (2010);Erratum-ibid. D81, 109902 (2010) [arXiv:0906.4269]

work page arXiv 2010
[23]

Cannella, S

U. Cannella, S. Foffa, M. Maggiore, H. Sanctuary, and R. Sturani,Extracting the three and four-graviton ver- tices from binary pulsars and coalescing binaries,Phys. Rev. D80, 124035 (2009) [arXiv:0907.2186]

work page arXiv 2009
[24]

Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

N. Yunes and F. Pretorius,Fundamental theoretical bias in gravitational wave astrophysics and the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework,Phys. Rev. D80, 122003 (2009) [arXiv:0909.3328]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[25]

Cosmological test of gravity with polarizations of stochastic gravitational waves around 0.1-1 Hz

A. Nishizawa, A. Taruya, and S. Kawamura,Cosmo- logical test of gravity with polarizations of stochastic gravitational waves around 0.1-1 Hz,Phys. Rev. D81, 104043 (2010) [arXiv:0911.0525]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[26]

Gravitational Wave Tests of General Relativity with the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

N. Cornish, L. Sampson, N. Yunes, and F. Pretorius, Gravitational wave tests of general relativity with the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework,Phys. Rev. D84, 062003 (2011) [arXiv:1105.2088]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[27]

Constraining Lorentz- violating, modiﬁed dis- persion relations with gravitational waves

S. Mirshekari, N. Yunes, and C.M. Will,Constraining generic Lorentz violation and the speed of the gravi- ton with gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D85, 024041 (2012) [arXiv:1110.2720]

work page arXiv 2012
[28]

Post-Newtonian, Quasi-Circular Binary Inspirals in Quadratic Modified Gravity

K. Yagi, L.C. Stein, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka,Post- Newtonian, quasi-circular binary inspirals in quadratic modified gravity,Phys. Rev. D85, 064022 (2012); Erratum-ibid. D93, 029902 (2016) [arXiv:1110.5950]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[29]

Yunes, P

N. Yunes, P. Pani, and V. Cardoso,Gravitational waves from quasicircular extreme mass-ratio inspirals as probes of scalar-tensor theories,Phys. Rev. D85, 102003 (2012) [arXiv:1112.3351]

work page arXiv 2012
[30]

Chatziioannou, N

K. Chatziioannou, N. Yunes, and N. Cornish,Model- independent test of general relativity: An extended post- Einsteinian framework with complete polarization con- tent,Phys. Rev. D86, 022004 (2012);Erratum-Ibid. D 95, 129901 (2017) [arXiv:1204.2585]

work page arXiv 2012
[31]

Canizares, J

P. Canizares, J.R. Gair, and C.F. Sopuerta,Testing Chern–Simons modified gravity with gravitational-wave 6 detections of extreme-mass-ratio binaries,Phys. Rev. D 86, 044010 (2012) [arXiv:1205.1253]

work page arXiv 2012
[32]

K. Yagi, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka,Slowly rotating black holes in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity: Deformation quadratic in the spin,Phys. Rev. D86, 044037 (2012); Erratum-ibid. D89, 049902 (2014) [arXiv:1206.6130]

work page arXiv 2012
[33]

K. Yagi, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka,Gravitational waves from quasi-circular black hole binaries in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 251105 (2012);Erratum-ibid.116, 169902 (2016);Erratum- ibid.124, 029901 (2020) [arXiv:1208.5102]

work page arXiv 2012
[34]

Compact binary systems in scalar-tensor gravity: Equations of motion to 2.5 post-Newtonian order

S. Mirshekari and C.M. Will,Compact binary systems in scalar-tensor gravity: Equations of motion to 2.5 post-Newtonian order,Phys. Rev. D87, 084070 (2013) [arXiv:1301.4680]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[35]

Nishizawa and H

A. Nishizawa and H. Motohashi,Constraint on reheat- ing afterf(R)inflation from gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D89, 063541 (2014) [arXiv:1401.1023]

work page arXiv 2014
[36]

Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

E. Bertiet al.,Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations,Classical Quan- tum Gravity32, 243001 (2015) [arXiv:1501.07274]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[37]

Isi, A.J

M. Isi, A.J. Weinstein, C. Mead, and M. Pitkin, Detecting beyond-Einstein polarizations of continuous gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D91, 082002 (2015) [arXiv:1502.00333]

work page arXiv 2015
[38]

Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

B.P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific andVirgoCollab- orations],Observation of gravitational waves from a bi- nary black hole merger,Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016) [arXiv:1602.03837]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016
[39]

The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

G. Agazieet al.[NANOGrav],The NANOGrav 15-year data set: evidence for a gravitational-wave background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023) [arXiv:2306.16213]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[40]

Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

A. Afzalet al.[NANOGrav],The NANOGrav 15 yr data set: search for signals from new physics,Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L11 (2023) [arXiv:2306.16219]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), Astron

J. Antoniadiset al.,The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravita- tional wave signals,Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023) [arXiv:2306.16214]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

D.J. Reardonet al.[PPTA],Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023) [arXiv:2306.16215]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[43]

Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

H. Xuet al.[CPTA],Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chi- nese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,Res. Astron. Astrophys.23, 075024 (2023) [arXiv:2306.16216]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[44]

Agazieet al., Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, ApJ966, 105 (2024), arXiv:2309.00693 [astro-ph.HE]

G. Agazieet al.[International Pulsar Timing Array], Comparing recent PTA results on the nanohertz stochas- tic gravitational wave background,Astrophys. J.966, 105 (2024) [arXiv:2309.00693]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

Ellis, N.E

J. Ellis, N.E. Mavromatos, and D.V. Nanopou- los,Comments on graviton propagation in light of GW150914,Mod. Phys. Lett. A31, 1650155 (2016) [arXiv:1602.04764]

work page arXiv 2016
[46]

Kostelecký and M

V.A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes,Testing local Lorentz invariance with gravitational waves,Phys. Lett. B757, 510 (2016) [arXiv:1602.04782]

work page arXiv 2016
[47]

Calcagni, Lorentz violations in multifractal spacetimes, Eur

G. Calcagni,Lorentz violations in multifrac- tal spacetimes,Eur. Phys. J. C77, 291 (2017) [arXiv:1603.03046]

work page arXiv 2017
[48]

What gravity waves are telling about quantum spacetime,

M. Arzano and G. Calcagni,What gravity waves are telling about quantum spacetime,Phys. Rev. D93, 124065 (2016) [arXiv:1604.00541]

work page arXiv 2016
[49]

Yunes, K

N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius,Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. D94, 084002 (2016) [arXiv:1603.08955]

work page arXiv 2016
[50]

Gasperini,Observable gravitational waves in pre- big bang cosmology: an update,JCAP12(2016) 010 [arXiv:1606.07889]

M. Gasperini,Observable gravitational waves in pre- big bang cosmology: an update,JCAP12(2016) 010 [arXiv:1606.07889]

work page arXiv 2016
[51]

Kobakhidze, C

A. Kobakhidze, C. Lagger, and A. Manning,Constrain- ing noncommutative spacetime from GW150914,Phys. Rev. D94, 064033 (2016) [arXiv:1607.03776]

work page arXiv 2016
[52]

Amelino-Camelia, G

G. Amelino-Camelia, G. Calcagni and M. Ronco,Im- print of quantum gravity in the dimension and fab- ric of spacetime,Phys. Lett. B774, 630 (2017) [arXiv:1705.04876]

work page arXiv 2017
[53]

Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. I. Formulation

A. Nishizawa,Generalized framework for testing grav- ity with gravitational-wave propagation. I. Formulation, Phys. Rev. D97, 104037 (2018) [arXiv:1710.04825]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[54]

Dark Energy after GW170817: dead ends and the road ahead

J.M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalacárregui,Dark energy af- ter GW170817: dead ends and the road ahead,Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251304 (2017) [arXiv:1710.05901]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[55]

Cabero, C

M. Cabero, C.D. Capano, O. Fischer-Birnholtz, B. Kr- ishnan, A.B.Nielsen, A.H.Nitz, andC.M.Biwer,Obser- vational tests of the black hole area increase law,Phys. Rev. D97, 124069 (2018) [arXiv:1711.09073]

work page arXiv 2018
[56]

Wang,Exploring the CPT violation and birefrin- gence of gravitational waves with ground- and space- based gravitational-wave interferometers,Eur

S. Wang,Exploring the CPT violation and birefrin- gence of gravitational waves with ground- and space- based gravitational-wave interferometers,Eur. Phys. J. C80, 342 (2020) [arXiv:1712.06072]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

The gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories

E. Belgacem, Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, and M. Mag- giore,Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modi- fied gravity theories,Phys. Rev. D97, 104066 (2018) [arXiv:1712.08108]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[58]

Berti, K

E. Berti, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes,Extreme gravity tests with gravitational waves from compact binary coales- cences: (I) inspiral-merger,Gen. Relativ. Gravit.50, 46 (2018) [arXiv:1801.03208]

work page arXiv 2018
[59]

Bosso, S

P. Bosso, S. Das and R.B. Mann,Potential tests of the generalized uncertainty principle in the advanced LIGO experiment,Phys. Lett. B785, 498 (2018) [arXiv:1804.03620]

work page arXiv 2018
[60]

Tahura and K

S. Tahura and K. Yagi,Parametrized post-Einsteinian gravitational waveforms in various modified theo- ries of gravity,Phys. Rev. D98, 084042 (2018) [arXiv:1809.00259]

work page arXiv 2018
[61]

Nishizawa and T

A. Nishizawa and T. Kobayashi,Parity-violating grav- ity and GW170817,Phys. Rev. D98, 124018 (2018) [arXiv:1809.00815]

work page arXiv 2018
[62]

Addazi, A

A. Addazi, A. Marcianò, and N. Yunes,Can we probe Planckian corrections at the horizon scale with gravi- tational waves?,Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 081301 (2019) [arXiv:1810.10417]

work page arXiv 2019
[63]

From micro to macro and back: probing near-horizon quantum structures with gravitational waves,

A. Maselli, P. Pani, V. Cardoso, T. Abdelsalhin, L. Gualtieri, and V. Ferrari,From micro to macro and back: probing near-horizon quantum structures with gravitational waves,Classical Quantum Gravity36, 167001 (2019) [arXiv:1811.03689]

work page arXiv 2019
[64]

Berry, S

C.P.L. Berry, S.A. Hughes, C.F. Sopuerta, A.J.K. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D.P. Mihaylov, M.C. Miller, and A. Sesana,The unique potential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational-wave astronomy, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 42 (2019) [arXiv:1903.03686]

work page arXiv 2019
[65]

Calcagni, S

G. Calcagni, S. Kuroyanagi, S. Marsat, M. Sakellar- iadou, N. Tamanini, and G. Tasinato,Gravitational- wave luminosity distance in quantum gravity,Phys. Lett. 7 B798, 135000 (2019) [arXiv:1904.00384]

work page arXiv 2019
[66]

Hagihara, N

Y. Hagihara, N. Era, D. Iikawa, A. Nishizawa, and H. Asada,Constraining extra gravitational wave polar- izations with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KA- GRA and upper bounds from GW170817,Phys. Rev. D 100, 064010 (2019) [arXiv:1904.02300]

work page arXiv 2019
[67]

Exploring strong-ﬁeld deviations from general relativity via gravitational waves,

S.B. Giddings, S. Koren, and G. Treviño,Explor- ing strong-field deviations from general relativity via gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D100, 044005 (2019) [arXiv:1904.04258]

work page arXiv 2019
[68]

R. Nair, S. Perkins, H.O. Silva, and N. Yunes,Funda- mental physics implications for higher-curvature theo- ries from binary black hole signals in the LIGO-Virgo catalog GWTC-1,Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 191101 (2019) [arXiv:1905.00870]

work page arXiv 2019
[69]

Testing modiﬁed gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens,

E. Belgacemet al.[LISA Cosmology Working Group], Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens,JCAP07(2019) 024 [arXiv:1906.01593]

work page arXiv 2019
[70]

Quantum gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy,

G. Calcagni, S. Kuroyanagi, S. Marsat, M. Sakellari- adou, N. Tamanini, and G. Tasinato,Quantum gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy,JCAP10(2019) 012 [arXiv:1907.02489]

work page arXiv 2019
[71]

Parametrized and inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency tests of gravity with multiband gravitational wave observations,

Z. Carson and K. Yagi,Parametrized and inspiral- merger-ringdown consistency tests of gravity with multi- band gravitational wave observations,Phys. Rev. D101, 044047 (2020) [arXiv:1911.05258]

work page arXiv 2020
[72]

Agullò, V

I. Agullò, V. Cardoso, A. del Rio, M. Maggiore, and J. Pullin, Gravitational-wave signatures of quan- tum gravity.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 041302 (2021) [arXiv:2007.13761]

work page arXiv 2021
[73]

G.CalcagniandS.Kuroyanagi,Stochastic gravitational- wave background in quantum gravity,JCAP03(2021) 019 [arXiv:2012.00170]

work page arXiv 2021
[74]

Takeda, S

H. Takeda, S. Morisaki, and A. Nishizawa,Search for scalar-tensor mixed polarization modes of grav- itational waves,Phys. Rev. D105, 084019 (2022) [arXiv:2105.00253]

work page arXiv 2022
[75]

Bakeret al.[LISA Cosmology Working Group],Mea- suring the propagation speed of gravitational waves with LISA,JCAP08(2022) 031 [arXiv:2203.00566]

T. Bakeret al.[LISA Cosmology Working Group],Mea- suring the propagation speed of gravitational waves with LISA,JCAP08(2022) 031 [arXiv:2203.00566]

work page arXiv 2022
[76]

Calcagni and L

G. Calcagni and L. Modesto,Testing quantum gravity with primordial gravitational waves,JHEP12(2024) 024 [arXiv:2206.07066]

work page arXiv 2024
[77]

Takeda, S

H. Takeda, S. Tsujikawa, and A. Nishizawa, Gravitational-wave constraints on scalar-tensor gravity from a neutron star and black-hole binary GW200115, Phys. Rev. D109, 104072 (2024) [arXiv:2311.09281]

work page arXiv 2024
[78]

Ben-Dayan, G

I. Ben-Dayan, G. Calcagni, M. Gasperini, A. Mazum- dar, E. Pavone, U. Thattarampilly, and A. Verma, Gravitational-wave background in bouncing models from semi-classical, quantum and string gravity,JCAP09 (2024) 058 [arXiv:2406.13521]

work page arXiv 2024
[79]

Vilas Currás and G

X. Vilas Currás and G. Calcagni,LISA as a probe of pre-big-bang physics: a nested sampling analysis, JCAP in press (2026) [arXiv:2511.16748]

work page arXiv 2026
[80]

C. Mu, S. Cao, S. Tian, X. Jiang, C. Zheng, and D. Cheng,Testing screened modified gravity with strongly lensed gravitational waves, arXiv:2603.09340

work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.