arxiv: 2604.18702 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Confinement in a finite duality cascade

Fabrizio Aramini, Matteo Bertolini, Pietro Moroni, Riccardo Argurio, Valdo Tatitscheff

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords confinementWilson loopdomain wallsholographyduality cascadeChern-Simons theorytopological quantum field theorysupersymmetric gauge theory

0 comments

The pith

Holographic dual shows area-law Wilson loops and gapped vacua in a finite duality cascade.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes consistency checks for confining dynamics in a holographic dual of a four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory that begins on a conformal manifold in the ultraviolet and ends in a finite set of isolated, fully gapped vacua in the infrared. The authors compute the expectation value of a fundamental Wilson loop in the dual supergravity background and demonstrate that it follows an area law. They construct domain walls between vacua as D5-branes wrapping a compact three-cycle, showing that the walls are governed by a three-dimensional N=1 Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory that flows in the deep infrared to a topological quantum field theory whose inflow action reproduces the four-dimensional mixed anomaly. The background also renders axionic strings unstable, implying the absence of a massless axion and aligning with the fully gapped character of the vacua. A sympathetic reader would care because the results supply a controlled string-theoretic realization of how confinement and discrete vacua can arise from an ultraviolet conformal phase.

Core claim

In the supergravity background obtained from D3-branes at the conifold in the presence of an O7-plane, the expectation value of a fundamental Wilson loop obeys an area law. Domain walls that interpolate between different vacua are realized by D5-branes wrapping a compact three-cycle of the internal manifold. Their dynamics are described by the (2+1)-dimensional N=1 Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory that reduces in the deep infrared to a topological quantum field theory whose inflow action correctly reproduces the mixed anomaly of the four-dimensional theory. Axionic strings are unstable in this background, implying that the corresponding massless axion is absent and that the vacua are fully g<f

What carries the argument

The supergravity background with D3-branes at the conifold singularity in the presence of an O7-plane, featuring non-trivial profiles for all fields, which functions as the holographic dual permitting direct computation of the Wilson loop and explicit construction of domain walls.

If this is right

The fundamental Wilson loop obeys an area law, establishing linear confinement.
Domain walls between vacua are constructed from D5-branes wrapping the three-cycle.
The domain-wall dynamics reduce to a TQFT that reproduces the four-dimensional mixed anomaly via inflow.
Axionic strings are unstable, removing the massless axion and confirming the absence of light modes.
The infrared vacua are fully gapped with no massless degrees of freedom.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This background may serve as a template for building other holographic models of confining supersymmetric theories that terminate without unwanted massless fields.
The mechanism rendering axionic strings unstable could be examined in related orientifolded conifold geometries.
Computing the glueball spectrum or other bound-state masses in the same background would provide a direct test of the mass gap.
The successful anomaly matching via inflow suggests the construction could extend to additional gapped phases in supersymmetric gauge theories.

Load-bearing premise

The supergravity background with D3-branes at the conifold in the presence of an O7-plane is a valid holographic dual to the four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory that flows from a conformal manifold to a finite set of isolated, fully gapped vacua.

What would settle it

An explicit evaluation of the Wilson loop in the background that yields a perimeter law instead of an area law, or a demonstration that axionic strings remain stable, would falsify the claims of confinement and fully gapped vacua.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18702 by Fabrizio Aramini, Matteo Bertolini, Pietro Moroni, Riccardo Argurio, Valdo Tatitscheff.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: S as a function of L for different values of τ0. The plot shows linear behavior at large L and conformal-like behavior at small L. is plotted in figure 1. Importantly, one sees that S becomes linear in L for large L, signaling that the Wilson loop follows an area law and confirming that our background is dual to a confining vacuum, with unbroken Z2 one-form symmetry. The linear behavior can also be checked… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: We show the plot of L (resp. S) against τm in fig. 2a (resp. 2b) for different values of τ0. Both functions diverge at τm “ τ‹, which is the zero of the function pe ´ϕhq 1 plotted against τm in fig. 2c. two different vacua on the left and right half-spaces, respectively. In such configurations, a domain wall (i.e. a tensionful codimension-one solitonic object) must necessarily separate the two spatial regi… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The quiver gauge theory on a stack of regular and fractional branes at the tip of the conifold in presence of an O7-plane. Nodes represent symplectic gauge groups, lines connecting them represent chiral superfields transforming in the fundamental representation of each of the two gauge groups. X1, X2 transform as a doublet under a SUp2q flavor symmetry. The matrix J is the invariant tensor of the unitary s… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We provide several consistency checks of confining dynamics in a recently conjectured holographic dual of a four-dimensional ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetric gauge theory that flows from a conformal manifold in the UV to a finite set of isolated, fully gapped vacua in the IR. This is obtained by considering D3-branes at the conifold singularity in the presence of an O7-plane, leading to a background where all supergravity fields have a non-trivial profile. We compute holographically the expectation value of a Wilson loop in the fundamental representation and show that it obeys an area law. We then construct the domain walls which interpolate between different vacua in terms of D5-branes wrapping a compact three-cycle of the internal manifold. Their dynamics is governed by the (2+1)-dimensional ${\cal N}=1$ Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory predicted by field theory arguments, that reduces in the deep infrared to a TQFT whose inflow action correctly reproduces the mixed anomaly of the four-dimensional theory. Finally, we argue that, unlike in previous models in the literature, axionic strings are unstable in this background. This implies that the corresponding massless axion that would couple to them is absent, in agreement with the fact that the vacua are fully gapped.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper runs standard holographic checks on a conjectured D3+O7 background and recovers area-law confinement plus anomaly-matching domain walls, but the whole thing stands or falls on whether that background is actually a valid solution.

read the letter

The main point is that they take the recently conjectured supergravity background for D3-branes at the conifold with an O7-plane and compute three things: the fundamental Wilson loop shows a clear area law, D5-branes wrapped on the three-cycle give domain walls whose worldvolume theory is the expected 3D N=1 YM-CS that flows to a TQFT with the right mixed anomaly inflow, and axionic strings are unstable so there is no massless axion left in the IR. All of this lines up with the field theory picture of a theory that starts on a conformal manifold and ends in fully gapped vacua after a finite cascade. That is the concrete new output here. The calculations use the usual toolkit—Nambu-Goto action for the loops, DBI plus Chern-Simons for the branes—and they appear to be done without obvious shortcuts or post-hoc tuning. Credit to them for carrying the checks through to the anomaly inflow and the string instability argument, which is a nice way to confirm the absence of unwanted light modes. The soft spot is exactly what the stress-test flagged: everything presupposes that the background solves the 10D equations, has the correct flux quantization, reproduces the right number of vacua, and satisfies the orientifold projection without extra massless fields. The abstract says consistency checks were performed, but if the full paper only shows the profiles and the derived quantities without an explicit verification of the equations of motion or a count of the vacua from the geometry, then these are internal consistency tests rather than independent evidence. That is not fatal for a model-building paper, but it does mean the results are conditional on accepting the conjecture. This is for people already working on holographic duals of confining SUSY theories with cascades and orientifolds. A reader who cares about explicit constructions for gapped phases or anomaly matching in AdS/CFT will get something usable out of it. I would send it to peer review; the checks are worth a referee looking at the details of the background and the numerics, even if the foundational assumption needs more scrutiny.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides consistency checks for confining dynamics in a conjectured holographic dual of a 4D N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory flowing from a UV conformal manifold to a finite set of isolated, fully gapped IR vacua. The setup uses D3-branes at the conifold with an O7-plane, yielding a background with non-trivial profiles for all supergravity fields. Checks include a holographic computation showing that the fundamental Wilson loop obeys an area law, construction of domain walls as D5-branes wrapping a compact three-cycle whose low-energy dynamics reduce to 3D N=1 Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory with anomaly inflow matching the 4D mixed anomaly, and an argument that axionic strings are unstable (implying absence of a massless axion, consistent with gapped vacua).

Significance. If the conjectured supergravity background is a valid holographic dual, these checks would supply non-trivial support for confinement via the area law, for the IR TQFT structure via anomaly matching, and for the absence of massless modes. The distinguishing feature of axionic string instability relative to prior models could help clarify the vacuum structure in finite duality cascades.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and §1] The supergravity background is introduced as 'recently conjectured' (abstract and §1) but the manuscript provides no explicit verification that it solves the 10D equations of motion, satisfies orientifold consistency conditions, or reproduces the expected UV asymptotics and flux quantization from the field theory side. This assumption underpins every subsequent check.
[Wilson loop section] The holographic Wilson loop computation (claimed to obey an area law) is presented without the explicit metric components, warp factor, or Nambu-Goto action minimization procedure, nor any error estimates or robustness checks against approximations (section on Wilson loop computation).
[Domain walls and TQFT section] The claim that D5-brane domain walls reduce to 3D N=1 YM-CS theory whose inflow action reproduces the 4D mixed anomaly is stated without explicit computation of the CS levels, anomaly coefficients, or direct comparison to field theory values (section on domain walls and TQFT).

minor comments (1)

Notation for the internal manifold cycles and flux profiles could be clarified with a summary table or explicit definitions to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation while preserving the focus on consistency checks for the conjectured background.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §1] The supergravity background is introduced as 'recently conjectured' (abstract and §1) but the manuscript provides no explicit verification that it solves the 10D equations of motion, satisfies orientifold consistency conditions, or reproduces the expected UV asymptotics and flux quantization from the field theory side. This assumption underpins every subsequent check.

Authors: We agree that the background is conjectured and that the manuscript centers on consistency checks rather than a full re-derivation. The explicit solution of the 10D equations of motion, orientifold consistency conditions, UV asymptotics, and flux quantization matching are established in the prior reference where the background was constructed. To make the present manuscript more self-contained, we will add a concise summary paragraph in Section 1 that recalls the key matching conditions and provides direct citations to the relevant equations and checks in the construction paper. This addresses the concern without duplicating the full derivation. revision: partial
Referee: [Wilson loop section] The holographic Wilson loop computation (claimed to obey an area law) is presented without the explicit metric components, warp factor, or Nambu-Goto action minimization procedure, nor any error estimates or robustness checks against approximations (section on Wilson loop computation).

Authors: We acknowledge that additional explicit details will improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we will include the relevant metric components and warp factor, provide a step-by-step outline of the Nambu-Goto action minimization, and discuss the numerical approximations together with qualitative robustness arguments supporting the area-law result. revision: yes
Referee: [Domain walls and TQFT section] The claim that D5-brane domain walls reduce to 3D N=1 YM-CS theory whose inflow action reproduces the 4D mixed anomaly is stated without explicit computation of the CS levels, anomaly coefficients, or direct comparison to field theory values (section on domain walls and TQFT).

Authors: We agree that the section would benefit from more explicit derivations. We will expand it to include the computation of the Chern-Simons levels from the D5-brane world-volume action, the resulting anomaly coefficients, and a direct side-by-side comparison with the mixed anomaly coefficients expected from the 4D field theory. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: consistency checks are independent computations within the conjectured background

full rationale

The paper computes the Wilson loop expectation value to exhibit an area law, constructs D5-brane domain walls whose dynamics reduce to 3D N=1 YM-CS with anomaly inflow matching, and argues axionic string instability implying no massless axion. These steps are explicit calculations performed in the assumed supergravity background and compared to field theory expectations; they do not reduce by construction to the input conjecture via self-definition, parameter fitting, or renaming. The background itself is stated as recently conjectured, but the present work supplies new, falsifiable checks rather than presupposing its validity through a load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem. No equations or derivations in the text equate outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the conjectured holographic duality, standard type-IIB supergravity equations, and the existence of the O7-plane background; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The given supergravity solution with D3-branes at the conifold and O7-plane is dual to the described 4D N=1 gauge theory.
Invoked throughout the abstract as the starting point for all holographic calculations.
standard math Standard rules of AdS/CFT and probe-brane dynamics apply without additional corrections in this background.
Used to interpret the Wilson-loop expectation value and D5-brane wrapping as domain walls.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5534 in / 1570 out tokens · 38910 ms · 2026-05-10T03:47:22.877970+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

[1]

Confinement of Quarks,

K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of Quarks,”Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2445–2459. 2, 3

1974
[2]

On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement,

G. ’t Hooft, “On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement,”Nucl. Phys. B138(1978) 1–25. 2

1978
[3]

Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, “Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,”JHEP05(2017) 091,arXiv:1703.00501 [hep-th]. 2

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[4]

Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,

E. Witten, “Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,”Nucl. Phys. B202(1982) 253. 2

1982
[5]

Domain walls in strongly coupled theories,

G. R. Dvali and M. A. Shifman, “Domain walls in strongly coupled theories,”Phys. Lett. B396(1997) 64–69,arXiv:hep-th/9612128. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 407, 452 (1997)]. 2

work page arXiv 1997
[6]

Generalized Global Symmetries

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,” JHEP02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]. 3, 17

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[7]

The Power of holomorphy: Exact results in 4-D SUSY field theories,

N. Seiberg, “The Power of holomorphy: Exact results in 4-D SUSY field theories,” in Particles, Strings, and Cosmology (PASCOS 94), pp. 0357–369. 5, 1994. arXiv:hep-th/9408013. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1994
[8]

The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998
[9]

Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998
[10]

Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,”Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114,arXiv:hep-th/9802109. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998
[11]

Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity

O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,”Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183–386, arXiv:hep-th/9905111. 3 26

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[12]

Anti-de Sitter Space, Thermal Phase Transition, And Confinement In Gauge Theories

E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505–532,arXiv:hep-th/9803131. 3

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[13]

Klebanov and M.J

I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, “Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities,”JHEP08(2000) 052, arXiv:hep-th/0007191. 3, 5, 13, 16, 18, 26

work page arXiv 2000
[14]

Maldacena and C

J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, “Towards the large N limit of pure N=1 superYang-Mills,”Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 588–591,arXiv:hep-th/0008001. 3, 13

work page arXiv 2001
[15]

Orientifolds and duality cascades: confinement before the wall,

R. Argurio and M. Bertolini, “Orientifolds and duality cascades: confinement before the wall,”JHEP02(2018) 149,arXiv:1711.08983 [hep-th]. 3

work page arXiv 2018
[16]

Gravity, finite duality cascades and confinement,

F. Aramini, R. Argurio, M. Bertolini, E. García-Valdecasas, and P. Moroni, “Gravity, finite duality cascades and confinement,”JHEP09(2025) 054,arXiv:2506.18988 [hep-th]. 3, 4, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24

work page arXiv 2025
[17]

Backreacting flavors in the Klebanov-Strassler background,

F. Benini, F. Canoura, S. Cremonesi, C. Nunez, and A. V. Ramallo, “Backreacting flavors in the Klebanov-Strassler background,”JHEP09(2007) 109,arXiv:0706.1238 [hep-th]. 3

work page arXiv 2007
[18]

Maldacena,Wilson loops in large N field theories,Phys

J. M. Maldacena, “Wilson loops in large N field theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 4859–4862,arXiv:hep-th/9803002. 4, 5

work page arXiv 1998
[19]

Rey and J.-T

S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee, “Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C22(2001) 379–394, arXiv:hep-th/9803001. 4, 5

work page arXiv 2001
[20]

Symmetry breaking and axionic strings in the warped deformed conifold,

S. S. Gubser, C. P. Herzog, and I. R. Klebanov, “Symmetry breaking and axionic strings in the warped deformed conifold,”JHEP09(2004) 036,arXiv:hep-th/0405282. 4, 16

work page arXiv 2004
[21]

Brandhuber, N

A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Wilson loops, confinement, and phase transitions in large N gauge theories from supergravity,”JHEP 06(1998) 001,arXiv:hep-th/9803263. 5

work page arXiv 1998
[22]

What does the string / gauge correspondence teach us about Wilson loops?,

J. Sonnenschein, “What does the string / gauge correspondence teach us about Wilson loops?,” inAdvanced School on Supersymmetry in the Theories of Fields, Strings and Branes, pp. 219–269. 7, 1999.arXiv:hep-th/0003032. 5

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
[23]

C´ ordova, D

C. Córdova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, “Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications II,”SciPost Phys.8no. 1, (2020) 002,arXiv:1905.13361 [hep-th]. 10 27

work page arXiv 2020
[24]

WhenZ2 one-form symmetry leads to non-invertible axial symmetries,

R. Argurio and R. Vandepopeliere, “WhenZ2 one-form symmetry leads to non-invertible axial symmetries,”JHEP08(2023) 205,arXiv:2306.01414 [hep-th]. 10, 17

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

Living on the walls of super-QCD,

V. Bashmakov, F. Benini, S. Benvenuti, and M. Bertolini, “Living on the walls of super-QCD,”SciPost Phys.6no. 4, (2019) 044,arXiv:1812.04645 [hep-th]. 11

work page arXiv 2019
[26]

Domain walls in 4dN= 1 SYM,

D. Delmastro and J. Gomis, “Domain walls in 4dN= 1 SYM,”JHEP03(2021) 259, arXiv:2004.11395 [hep-th]. 11

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

Parity Violation and Gauge Noninvariance of the Effective Gauge Field Action in Three-Dimensions,

A. N. Redlich, “Parity Violation and Gauge Noninvariance of the Effective Gauge Field Action in Three-Dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 2366–2374. 12

1984
[28]

Comments on One-Form Global Symmetries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d

P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, “Comments on One-Form Global Symmetries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d,”SciPost Phys.6no. 3, (2019) 039,arXiv:1812.04716 [hep-th]. 13

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[29]

On domain walls of N=1 supersy mmetric Yang-Mills in four-dimensions,

B. S. Acharya and C. Vafa, “On domain walls of N=1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills in four-dimensions,”arXiv:hep-th/0103011. 13

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[30]

Apruzzi, M

F. Apruzzi, M. van Beest, D. S. W. Gould, and S. Schäfer-Nameki, “Holography, 1-form symmetries, and confinement,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 6, (2021) 066005, arXiv:2104.12764 [hep-th]. 13

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,

E. Witten, “Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,”JHEP07(1998) 006, arXiv:hep-th/9805112. 13, 17, 18

work page arXiv 1998
[32]

Consistency conditions for orientifolds and D-manifolds,

E. G. Gimon and J. Polchinski, “Consistency conditions for orientifolds and D-manifolds,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1667–1676,arXiv:hep-th/9601038. 14, 16

work page arXiv 1996
[33]

Theta Dependence In The Large N Limit Of Four-Dimensional Gauge Theories

E. Witten, “Theta dependence in the large N limit of four-dimensional gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 2862–2865,arXiv:hep-th/9807109. 15

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[34]

Variations on the warped deformed conifold,

S. S. Gubser, C. P. Herzog, and I. R. Klebanov, “Variations on the warped deformed conifold,”Comptes Rendus Physique5(2004) 1031–1038,arXiv:hep-th/0409186. 16

work page arXiv 2004
[35]

Massless fermionic bound states and the gauge/gravity correspondence,

R. Argurio, G. Ferretti, and C. Petersson, “Massless fermionic bound states and the gauge/gravity correspondence,”JHEP03(2006) 043,arXiv:hep-th/0601180. 16

work page arXiv 2006
[36]

Tachyon condensation in unstable type I D-brane systems,

O. Bergman, “Tachyon condensation in unstable type I D-brane systems,”JHEP11 (2000) 015,arXiv:hep-th/0009252. 16

work page arXiv 2000
[37]

Aharony, N

O. Aharony, N. Seiberg, and Y. Tachikawa, “Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories,”JHEP08(2013) 115,arXiv:1305.0318 [hep-th]. 17 28

work page arXiv 2013
[38]

The holography of duality inN= 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory,

O. Bergman and S. Hirano, “The holography of duality inN= 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory,”JHEP11(2022) 069,arXiv:2208.09396 [hep-th]. 17

work page arXiv 2022
[39]

Ji and X.-G

W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, “Non-invertible anomalies and mapping-class-group transformation of anomalous partition functions,”Phys. Rev. Research.1(2019) 033054, arXiv:1905.13279 [cond-mat.str-el]. 17

work page arXiv 2019
[40]

Gaiotto and J

D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,”JHEP02(2021) 132,arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]. 17

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

Apruzzi, F

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. García Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.402no. 1, (2023) 895–949,arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]. 17

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

Freed, G.W

D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,”arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]. 17

work page arXiv
[43]

Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and topological field theory,JHEP12(1998) 012 [hep-th/9812012]

E. Witten, “AdS/CFT correspondence and topological field theory.,”JHEP12(1998) 012,arXiv:hep-th/9812012. 17

work page arXiv 1998
[44]

Four lectures on the gauge / gravity correspondence,

M. Bertolini, “Four lectures on the gauge / gravity correspondence,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18(2003) 5647–5712,arXiv:hep-th/0303160. 26

work page arXiv 2003
[45]

Supergravity duals of supersymmetric four-dimensional gauge theories,

F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone, M. Petrini, and A. Zaffaroni, “Supergravity duals of supersymmetric four-dimensional gauge theories,”Riv. Nuovo Cim.25N12(2002) 1–70, arXiv:hep-th/0303191. 26

work page arXiv 2002
[46]

D-branes on the conifold and N=1 gauge / gravity dualities,

C. P. Herzog, I. R. Klebanov, and P. Ouyang, “D-branes on the conifold and N=1 gauge / gravity dualities,” inLes Houches Summer School: Session 76: Euro Summer School on Unity of Fundamental Physics: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings, pp. 189–223. 5, 2002.arXiv:hep-th/0205100. 26 29

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2002