arxiv: 2604.19346 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Flavour Physics beyond the LHC

Patrick Koppenburg

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex PACS 13.20.-v13.25.-k14.40.-n

keywords flavour physicsLHCbBelle IIe+e- colliderCP violationrare decaysStandard Model tests

0 comments

The pith

The next 20 years will be the golden age of flavour physics thanks to LHCb and Belle II, with further gains possible from a future e+e- collider.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper lays out the experimental roadmap for flavour physics over the coming decades. It argues that ongoing and near-term runs of the LHCb and Belle II detectors will deliver unprecedented precision on rare decays, CP violation, and other processes that can expose physics beyond the Standard Model. After those programs, an electron-positron collider running at the Z pole, on the W-pair threshold, and at the top threshold could push the same observables even further. The central message is that these facilities together form a coherent, multi-decade program rather than isolated efforts.

Core claim

The next 20 years will be the golden age of flavour physics, with the operation of the LHCb and Belle II experiments. After that an e+e- collider could further improve the precision with sizeable Z, W+W- and ttbar runs.

What carries the argument

The combined precision program of LHCb and Belle II, extended by high-luminosity Z, WW, and ttbar running at a future e+e- collider.

Load-bearing premise

That LHCb and Belle II will collect their full planned data sets and that a new e+e- collider will be built and operated with the described high-luminosity programs.

What would settle it

Observation that the integrated luminosities delivered by LHCb and Belle II fall well below their design goals, or that no e+e- collider with Z/WW/ttbar running is constructed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19346 by Patrick Koppenburg.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: (left) Experimental results [2–7] for P ′ 5 in B→ K∗µ +µ − processes and their average compared to theory prediction [8]. (right) Selected experimental results normalised and compared to the theory expectation [9]. 1Neutrinos will follow for sure. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Planned instantaneous and integrated luminosity (left) at LHCb [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: CKM unitarity conditions (top left) today, (top right) in the 2030s, (bottom left) after [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (left) Average charged multiplicity in bb events at the Υ(4S) and Z resonances, and at the LHC. 34 3 Flavour physics at the Z pole 35 Owing to the lower cross-section, b-physics at the Z pole cannot compete with the LHC 36 in sheer numbers, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (left) Precision on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The next 20 years will be the golden age of flavour physics, with the operation of the LHCb and Belle II experiments. After that an $e^+e^-$ collider could further improve the precision with sizeable $Z$, $W^+W^-$ and $t\bar{t}$ runs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a short perspective restating the community's known plans for LHCb, Belle II, and a possible future e+e- collider, with no new results or analysis.

read the letter

The main point is that Koppenburg's note is a forward-looking summary of experimental timelines in flavour physics rather than any original measurement, derivation, or model. It states that the next 20 years with LHCb and Belle II will be the golden age, followed by potential gains from a high-luminosity e+e- collider running at Z, WW, and ttbar energies. That is the entire substance. The factual parts line up with publicly available schedules for those experiments, so the timeline description itself is accurate as far as it goes. It also correctly notes that these machines target precision in rare decays and CP violation where new physics could show up indirectly. Beyond that, there is little else. The piece does not introduce new techniques, updated projections, or comparisons to other facilities. The 'golden age' phrasing is presented as fact but rests on the assumption that both current experiments will deliver their full planned luminosities without major setbacks and that a future collider will actually be funded and built with the described run plan. Those are standard community hopes, not demonstrated outcomes, and the text offers no quantitative backing for how much the precision will improve or what parameter space that would actually probe. No equations, fits, or sensitivity studies appear. This kind of note is mainly useful to experimentalists or students who want a one-page reminder of the big-picture roadmap before writing a grant or planning a talk. It does not contain enough depth or novelty to justify a reading-group discussion. I would not cite it because it adds no citable result or reference. For peer review in a research journal, it does not rise to the level that requires referee time; it reads more like an invited perspective or conference summary that could be handled by an editor alone.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a brief perspective piece asserting that the next 20 years will constitute the golden age of flavour physics, driven by the LHCb and Belle II experiments, and that a future e+e- collider could deliver further precision gains through dedicated high-luminosity runs at the Z pole, WW threshold, and ttbar production.

Significance. If the stated experimental timelines and performance projections hold, the note provides a concise roadmap for the post-LHC flavour-physics program that could inform community planning and resource allocation. The claims rest on publicly available experiment schedules rather than new derivations or data, and the qualitative 'golden age' label is presented without accompanying quantitative benchmarks or comparisons.

minor comments (1)

The manuscript would be strengthened by the addition of references to the official LHCb and Belle II upgrade documents and luminosity projections that underpin the 20-year timeline.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The note is intended as a concise perspective highlighting the expected impact of upcoming flavour-physics programmes based on established experimental schedules.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The document is a short forward-looking perspective on future flavour physics experiments and colliders. It contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or model assumptions. All statements are projections about experimental timelines and luminosity programs with no internal consistency conditions or self-referential logic that could reduce to the inputs by construction. No load-bearing steps of any enumerated kind are present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a short perspective article on planned experiments. It introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5320 in / 1030 out tokens · 30941 ms · 2026-05-10T01:21:00.969822+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[1]

(right) Selected experimental results normalised and compared to the theory expectation [9]

The “legacy” LHCb sample collected up to 2018 corresponds to about 3% of the target24 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 q2 [GeV2] −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 P ′ 5 Our average Belle’16 CMS’17 ( B0, run1) ATLAS’19 (B0) LHCb’25 ( B0 (ee)) CMS’24 ( B0) LHCb’25 ( B0) LHCb’20 ( B+) BSZ’15 patrick.koppenburg@cern.ch 2025-12-24 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Pull i...

2018
[2]

de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,arXiv:2511.03883

J. de Blaset al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European66 Strategy for Particle Physics, doi: 10.17181/CERN.35CH.2O2ParXiv:2511.03883.67

work page doi:10.17181/cern.35ch.2o2parxiv:2511.03883.67 2026
[3]

Aaijet al.,A comprehensive analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay,arXiv:2512.18053, Submitted to Phys

LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,A comprehensive analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ−68 decay,arXiv:2512.18053, Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.69

work page arXiv
[4]

Aaijet al.,Angular analysis of B0 →K ∗0e+e− decays, JHEP70 06(2025) 140,arXiv:2502.10291.71

LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Angular analysis of B0 →K ∗0e+e− decays, JHEP70 06(2025) 140,arXiv:2502.10291.71

work page arXiv 2025
[5]

Hayrapetyanet al.,Angular analysis of the B0 →K ∗(892)0µ+µ− decay in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys

CMS collaboration, A. Hayrapetyanet al.,Angular analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ−72 decay in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett.B864(2025) 139406,73 arXiv:2411.11820.74

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

Wehleet al.,Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys

Belle collaboration, S. Wehleet al.,Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of75 B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 111801,arXiv:1612.05014.76

work page arXiv 2017
[7]

CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyanet al.,Measurement of angular parameters from77 the decayB 0 → K∗0µ+µ− in proton-proton collisions at √s =8 TeV, Phys. Lett.78 B781(2018) 517,arXiv:1710.02846.79

work page arXiv 2018
[8]

Aaboudet al.,Angular analysis of B0 d →K ∗µ+µ− decays in pp collisions at √s = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10(2018) 047, arXiv:1805.04000

ATLAS collaboration, M. Aaboudet al.,Angular analysis of B0 d →K ∗µ+µ− decays80 in pp collisions at √s = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10(2018) 047,81 arXiv:1805.04000.82 2The plot in Fig. 3 is therefore mislabelled in “6×10 12” asWandtruns are equally important. 4

work page arXiv 2018
[9]

Alguer´ o, A

M. Alguer´ oet al.,To (b)e or not to (b)e: no electrons at LHCb, Eur. Phys. J.C8383 (2023) 648,arXiv:2304.07330.84

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

Koppenburg,Flavour anomalies, https://www.koppenburg.ch/anomalies.html.85 Accessed on April 22, 2026.86

P. Koppenburg,Flavour anomalies, https://www.koppenburg.ch/anomalies.html.85 Accessed on April 22, 2026.86

2026
[11]

Kobayashi and T

M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, C P Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak87 Interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys.49(1973) 652.88

1973
[12]

Banerjeeet al.(Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV)), Phys

Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, S. Banerjeeet al.,Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and89 τ-lepton properties as of 2023, Phys. Rev.D113(2026) 012008, arXiv:2411.18639,90 updated results and plots available athttps://hflav.web.cern.ch.91

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

LHCb collaboration,LHCb Framework TDR for the LHCb Upgrade II Opportunities92 in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era, CERN-LHCC-2021-012, 2022.93

2021
[14]

LHCb collaboration,Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II — Opportunities in flavour94 physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era,arXiv:1808.08865.95

work page arXiv
[15]

Accessed on April 22, 2026.96

https://www.belle2.org/research/luminosity/. Accessed on April 22, 2026.96

2026
[16]

ATLAS, Belle-II, CMS, LHCb collaboration,Projections for Key Measurements in97 Heavy Flavour Physics,arXiv:2503.24346.98

work page arXiv
[17]

Altmannet al.,ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top Fac- tory Study, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Vol

H. Abidiet al.,ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top Factory Study,99 doi: 10.23731/CYRM-2025-005arXiv:2506.15390.100 5

work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2025-005arxiv:2506.15390.100 2025