pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19418 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Quantum Spacetime, Quantum Gravity and Gravitized Quantum Theory

Tristan H\"ubsch , Djordje Minic
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quantum spacetimequantum gravityBorn rulenon-commutative geometrycontextual probabilitieshigher-order interferencegravitized quantum theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

A non-commutative dual to classical spacetime produces the fixed Born rule and contextual nature of quantum theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the quantum nature of spacetime includes a non-commutative dual companion to the observed classical spacetime, and that this dual structure directly accounts for the intrinsically probabilistic and contextual character of quantum theory along with its fixed Born rule. Extending this view to quantum gravity, the authors claim that quantum theory itself becomes gravitized, yielding a background-independent framework in which quantum probabilities are dynamical and contextual. If the central claim holds, quantum interference would include intrinsic triple and higher-order terms for massive probes, with potential implications for understanding string theory, vacuum energy, and elementary particle masses.

Core claim

We argue that the quantum nature of spacetime, which includes a non-commutative dual companion to the (observed) classical spacetime, is the reason behind an intrinsically probabilistic and contextual nature of quantum theory, with the fixed Born rule. In quantum gravity, we claim, quantum theory is gravitized into a background-independent structure with dynamical and contextual quantum probabilities. This proposal implies intrinsic triple and higher-order interference in the context of massive quantum probes, which sheds light on string theory and the observed vacuum energy as well as the masses of elementary particles.

What carries the argument

the non-commutative dual companion to the observed classical spacetime, which directly generates the fixed Born rule together with contextual and probabilistic features of quantum theory

Load-bearing premise

That the postulated non-commutative dual companion to classical spacetime directly produces the fixed Born rule and contextual probabilities of quantum theory without further mechanisms or assumptions.

What would settle it

An experiment that detects or fails to detect triple or higher-order interference in interference patterns produced by massive quantum probes.

read the original abstract

General relativity is a background-independent theory of a dynamical classical spacetime geometry. Quantum theory is formulated in a classical spacetime, as an intrinsically probabilistic, contextual theory of non-classical, interfering probabilities, with a fixed Born rule for computing those probabilities. We argue that the quantum nature of spacetime, which includes a non-commutative dual companion to the (observed) classical spacetime, is the reason behind an intrinsically probabilistic and contextual nature of quantum theory, with the fixed Born rule. In quantum gravity, we claim, quantum theory is gravitized into a background-independent structure with dynamical and contextual quantum probabilities. This proposal implies intrinsic triple and higher-order interference in the context of massive quantum probes, which sheds light on string theory and the observed vacuum energy as well as the masses of elementary particles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that the quantum nature of spacetime, including a non-commutative dual companion to the observed classical spacetime, accounts for the intrinsically probabilistic and contextual character of quantum theory with its fixed Born rule. It further claims that quantum gravity involves a 'gravitization' of quantum theory, rendering it background-independent with dynamical and contextual probabilities. This framework is said to imply intrinsic triple and higher-order interference for massive quantum probes, with potential implications for string theory, vacuum energy, and elementary particle masses.

Significance. If the central identification between the non-commutative dual spacetime and the origin of the Born rule can be made rigorous, the work would offer a novel foundational link between quantum gravity and quantum mechanics, potentially explaining why quantum probabilities are contextual and fixed in form. The suggested phenomenological consequences for higher-order interference could provide testable distinctions from standard quantum theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the non-commutative dual companion to classical spacetime 'is the reason behind' an intrinsically probabilistic quantum theory with the fixed Born rule is asserted conceptually but without an explicit algebraic construction, map from the dual algebra to states/observables, or derivation that recovers p = |⟨ψ|φ⟩|² (or equivalent) as the natural probability assignment.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The notions of 'quantum spacetime' and 'gravitized quantum theory' are introduced via reference to structures from the authors' prior publications; the central claim therefore reduces to a re-expression of those definitions rather than an independent derivation within this manuscript.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract introduces technical terms such as 'non-commutative dual companion' and 'gravitized quantum theory' without immediate definitions, precise mathematical statements, or forward references to where these are formalized in the body of the paper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and for recognizing the potential foundational implications of our work. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the non-commutative dual companion to classical spacetime 'is the reason behind' an intrinsically probabilistic quantum theory with the fixed Born rule is asserted conceptually but without an explicit algebraic construction, map from the dual algebra to states/observables, or derivation that recovers p = |⟨ψ|φ⟩|² (or equivalent) as the natural probability assignment.

    Authors: The manuscript is intended as a conceptual proposal that builds upon the algebraic framework established in our prior publications, where the non-commutative dual spacetime is rigorously defined and the emergence of the Born rule is derived from the duality between the classical and non-commutative structures. In this paper, we argue that this duality is the underlying reason for the fixed Born rule in quantum theory. We agree that an explicit recap would be helpful and will include a brief outline of the key mapping from the dual algebra to the probability rule in the revised version, referencing the detailed derivations from earlier works. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The notions of 'quantum spacetime' and 'gravitized quantum theory' are introduced via reference to structures from the authors' prior publications; the central claim therefore reduces to a re-expression of those definitions rather than an independent derivation within this manuscript.

    Authors: We respectfully disagree that the central claim is merely a re-expression. While the definitions of quantum spacetime and the non-commutative dual are drawn from our previous work, this manuscript presents a novel synthesis by arguing for the 'gravitization' of quantum theory in the context of quantum gravity, leading to dynamical probabilities and higher-order interference. These implications, including connections to string theory, vacuum energy, and particle masses, are developed here for the first time. We will revise the abstract and introduction to more clearly highlight these new contributions and the independent aspects of the argument. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central claim that non-commutative dual spacetime produces fixed Born rule reduces to self-cited prior definitions without independent algebraic derivation.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "We argue that the quantum nature of spacetime, which includes a non-commutative dual companion to the (observed) classical spacetime, is the reason behind an intrinsically probabilistic and contextual nature of quantum theory, with the fixed Born rule. In quantum gravity, we claim, quantum theory is gravitized into a background-independent structure with dynamical and contextual quantum probabilities."

    The non-commutative dual companion is introduced as the explanatory reason for the Born rule, yet the paper provides no algebraic construction starting from the dual non-commutativity, defining states/observables, and recovering the Born rule as the natural probability assignment. The structures invoked are those defined in the authors' previous work, so the central identification reduces to a re-expression of those prior definitions rather than an independent derivation.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing step asserts that the postulated non-commutative dual companion to classical spacetime directly accounts for the fixed Born rule and contextual probabilities, but supplies no explicit construction or map from the dual algebra to p = |⟨ψ|φ⟩|². This identification is presented as an argument rather than a derivation, and the key structures (quantum spacetime, gravitized quantum theory) are defined via the authors' prior publications. The result therefore re-expresses those prior inputs rather than deriving new content from first principles or external benchmarks. No equations in the provided text close the gap from dual non-commutativity to the probability measure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The proposal rests on the introduction of quantum spacetime with a non-commutative dual and the modification of quantum theory into a gravitized form, both postulated without independent evidence or derivations in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • ad hoc to paper Spacetime possesses a non-commutative dual companion to the observed classical spacetime
    Invoked as the source of quantum probabilities and the fixed Born rule.
  • ad hoc to paper Quantum theory admits a gravitization that renders probabilities dynamical and contextual
    Central postulate enabling background-independent quantum gravity.
invented entities (2)
  • Non-commutative dual spacetime no independent evidence
    purpose: To explain the origin of probabilistic and contextual quantum behavior
    New postulated structure with no independent falsifiable evidence provided.
  • Gravitized quantum theory no independent evidence
    purpose: To describe quantum probabilities as dynamical in a background-independent manner
    Invented framework without external validation or derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5426 in / 1551 out tokens · 61361 ms · 2026-05-10T02:22:52.395088+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    H¨ ubsch and D

    T. H¨ ubsch and D. Minic,The Weight of Quantum: Quantum Theory and the Structure of Physics. CRC Press, July, 2026.https: //www.routledge.com/The-Weight-of-Quantum-Quantum-Theory-and-the-Structure-of-Physics/ Hubsch-Minic/p/book/9781041191285

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    From quantum foundations of quantum field theory, string theory and quantum gravity to dark matter and dark energy,

    D. Minic, “From quantum foundations of quantum field theory, string theory and quantum gravity to dark matter and dark energy,” in10th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics, pp. 183–218. 2020.arXiv:2003.00318 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Berglund, L

    P. Berglund, L. Freidel, T. Hubsch, J. Kowalski-Glikman, R. G. Leigh, D. Mattingly, and D. Minic, “Infrared Properties of Quantum Gravity: UV/IR Mixing, Gravitizing the Quantum – Theory and Observation,” in 2022 Snowmass Summer Study. 2, 2022.arXiv:2202.06890 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Gravitizing the Quantum,

    P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, D. Mattingly, and D. Minic, “Gravitizing the Quantum,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31 no. 14, (3, 2022) 2242024 (9 pages),arXiv:2203.17137 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Triple interference, non-linear Talbot effect and gravitization of the quantum,

    P. Berglund, A. Geraci, T. H¨ ubsch, D. Mattingly, and D. Minic, “Triple interference, non-linear Talbot effect and gravitization of the quantum,”arXiv:2303.15645 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    The Vacuum Energy Density and Gravitational Entropy,

    L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “The Vacuum Energy Density and Gravitational Entropy,”arXiv:2212.00901 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    On de Sitter Spacetime and String Theory,

    P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, and D. Minic, “On de Sitter Spacetime and String Theory,”arXiv:2212.06086 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    String theory bounds on the cosmological constant, the Higgs mass, and the quark and lepton masses,

    P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, and D. Minic, “String theory bounds on the cosmological constant, the Higgs mass, and the quark and lepton masses,”Symmetry15no. 9, (8, 2023) 1660,arXiv:2307.16712 [hep-th]. 28

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Quantum gravity as gravitized quantum theory,

    T. H¨ ubsch and D. Minic, “Quantum gravity as gravitized quantum theory,” inProceedings of the 3rd Conference on Nolinearity (Sep. 4–8. 2023), B. Dragovich and ˇZ. ˇCupi´ c, eds., pp. 1–72. Serbian Academy of Nonlinear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia, 2024.arXiv:2407.06207 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Information Metrics and Possible Limitations of Local Information Objectivity in Quantum Gravity,

    P. Berglund, A. Geraci, T. Hubsch, D. Mattingly, and D. Minic, “Information Metrics and Possible Limitations of Local Information Objectivity in Quantum Gravity,”arXiv:2501.19269 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Dynamical dark energy, dual spacetime, and DESI,

    S. Hur, V. Jejjala, M. J. Kavic, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, “Dynamical dark energy, dual spacetime, and DESI,”JCAP11(2025) 054,arXiv:2503.20854 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Nambu quantum mechanics: A Nonlinear generalization of geometric quantum mechanics,

    D. Minic and H. C. Tze, “Nambu quantum mechanics: A Nonlinear generalization of geometric quantum mechanics,”Phys. Lett. B536(2002) 305–314,arXiv:hep-th/0202173

    work page arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    Background independent quantum mechanics and gravity,

    D. Minic and H. C. Tze, “Background independent quantum mechanics and gravity,”Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 061501,arXiv:hep-th/0305193

    work page arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    A general theory of quantum relativity,

    D. Minic and H. C. Tze, “A general theory of quantum relativity,”Phys. Lett. B581(2004) 111–118, arXiv:hep-th/0309239

    work page arXiv 2004

  15. [15]

    Geometrical formulation of quantum mechanics,

    A. Ashtekar and T. A. Schilling, “Geometrical formulation of quantum mechanics,”arXiv:gr-qc/9706069

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  16. [16]

    Statistical Distance and Hilbert Space,

    W. K. Wootters, “Statistical Distance and Hilbert Space,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 357–362

    1981

  17. [17]

    Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states,

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, “Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 72(1994) 3439–3443

    1994

  18. [18]

    What is quantum theory of gravity?,

    D. Minic and H. C. Tze, “What is quantum theory of gravity?,” in3rd International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries, pp. 159–166. 1, 2004.arXiv:hep-th/0401028

    work page arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    Geometry of quantum evolution,

    J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov, “Geometry of quantum evolution,”Phys. Rev. Lett.65(Oct, 1990) 1697–1700

    1990

  20. [20]

    Physical limits on information metrics and quantum gravity as gravitized quantum theory,

    P. Berglund, A. Geraci, T. Hubsch, D. Mattingly, and D. Minic, “Physical limits on information metrics and quantum gravity as gravitized quantum theory,”arXiv:2504.12925 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    A Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. Geraci, P. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, “Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.119no. 24, (2017) 240401,arXiv:1707.06050 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity

    C. Marletto and V. Vedral, “Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.119no. 24, (2017) 240402,arXiv:1707.06036 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Neutrino oscillations at JUNO, the Born rule, and Sorkin’s triple path interference,

    P. Huber, H. Minakata, D. Minic, R. Pestes, and T. Takeuchi, “Neutrino oscillations at JUNO, the Born rule, and Sorkin’s triple path interference,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 11, (2022) 115013,arXiv:2105.14061 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Quantum mechanics as quantum measure theory,

    R. D. Sorkin, “Quantum mechanics as quantum measure theory,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A9(1994) 3119–3128, arXiv:gr-qc/9401003

    work page arXiv 1994

  25. [25]

    Ruling Out Multi-Order Interference in Quantum Mechanics,

    U. Sinha, C. Couteau, T. Jennewein, R. Laflamme, and G. Weihs, “Ruling Out Multi-Order Interference in Quantum Mechanics,”Science329no. 5990, (2010) 418–421,arXiv:1007.4193 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    Three path interference using nuclear magnetic resonance: a test of the consistency of Born’s rule,

    D. K. Park, O. Moussa, and R. Laflamme, “Three path interference using nuclear magnetic resonance: a test of the consistency of Born’s rule,”New J. Phys.14(2012) 113025,arXiv:1207.2321 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    On the quantization of Nambu brackets,

    H. Awata, M. Li, D. Minic, and T. Yoneya, “On the quantization of Nambu brackets,”JHEP02(2001) 013, arXiv:hep-th/9906248

    work page arXiv 2001

  28. [28]

    Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics,

    Y. Nambu, “Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics,”Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2405–2412

    1973

  29. [29]

    Plávala, General probabilistic theories: An introduction, Physics Reports1033, 1–64 (2023), arXiv:2103.07469 [quant-ph]

    M. Pl´ avala, “General probabilistic theories: An introduction,”Phys. Rept.1033(2023) 1–64, arXiv:2103.07469 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Experimental higher-order interference in a nonlinear triple slit,

    P. Namdar, P. K. Jenke, I. A. Calafell, A. Trenti, M. Radonji´ c, B. Daki´ c, P. Walther, and L. A. Rozema, “Experimental higher-order interference in a nonlinear triple slit,”Phys. Rev. A107no. 3, (2023) 032211, arXiv:2112.06965 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    The Cosmological Constant Problems (Talk given at Dark Matter 2000, February, 2000)

    S. Weinberg, “The Cosmological constant problems,” in4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe (DM 2000), pp. 18–26. 2, 2000.arXiv:astro-ph/0005265

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2000

  32. [32]

    Evaluation of the One Loop String Path Integral,

    J. Polchinski, “Evaluation of the One Loop String Path Integral,”Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 37

    1986

  33. [33]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Dec., 2007. 29

    2007

  34. [34]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Dec., 2007

    2007

  35. [35]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38(1999) 1113–1133,arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

  36. [36]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett.B428(1998) 105–114,arXiv:hep-th/9802109 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  37. [37]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  38. [38]

    On the Inevitable Lightness of Vacuum,

    L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “On the Inevitable Lightness of Vacuum,” arXiv:2303.17495 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Modular spacetime,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Modular spacetime,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.D24no. 12, (2015) 1544028

    2015

  40. [40]

    Quantum Spaces are Modular,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Quantum Spaces are Modular,”Phys. Rev.D94no. 10, (2016) 104052,arXiv:1606.01829 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    A Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy to Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “A Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy to Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 287

    1981

  42. [42]

    The holographic principle

    R. Bousso, “The Holographic principle,”Rev. Mod. Phys.74(2002) 825–874,arXiv:hep-th/0203101

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  43. [43]

    Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,

    E. P. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,”Phys. Lett. B822(2021) 136663,arXiv:1902.08207 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Background Independent Field Quantization with Sequences of Gravity-Coupled Approximants,

    M. Becker and M. Reuter, “Background Independent Field Quantization with Sequences of Gravity-Coupled Approximants,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 12, (2020) 125001,arXiv:2008.09430 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Quantum Fields and the Cosmological Constant,

    R. Ferrero, V. Naso, and R. Percacci, “Quantum Fields and the Cosmological Constant,”Universe11no. 6, (2025) 173,arXiv:2503.17203 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Gravity and the Higgs boson mass,

    C. Branchina, V. Branchina, F. Contino, R. Gandolfo, and A. Pernace, “Gravity and the Higgs boson mass,” arXiv:2507.13832 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Darkness: What comprises empty space?

    J. Bjorken, “Darkness: What comprises empty space?”Annalen der Physik525no. 5, (2013) A67–A79

    2013

  48. [48]

    Masses and mixings of quarks and leptons

    J. D. Bjorken, “Masses and mixings of quarks and leptons.” Slides, last checked: Nov., 2022. https://nebula.wsimg.com/44afe7e009f4c9854e6dc1b8887bdbc8?AccessKeyId=D5AC63041E00FF1ED0E8& disposition=0&alloworigin=1

    2022

  49. [49]

    Standard model criticality prediction: Top mass 173 +- 5-GeV and Higgs mass 135 +- 9-GeV,

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, “Standard model criticality prediction: Top mass 173 +- 5-GeV and Higgs mass 135 +- 9-GeV,”Phys. Lett. B368(1996) 96–102,arXiv:hep-ph/9511371

    work page arXiv 1996

  50. [50]

    Quantum Gravity, Dynamical Phase Space and String Theory,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Quantum Gravity, Dynamical Phase Space and String Theory,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.D23no. 12, (2014) 1442006,arXiv:1405.3949 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    Born Reciprocity in String Theory and the Nature of Spacetime,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Born Reciprocity in String Theory and the Nature of Spacetime,” Phys. Lett.B730(2014) 302–306,arXiv:1307.7080 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    Metastring Theory and Modular Space-time,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Metastring Theory and Modular Space-time,”J. High Energ. Phys.06 (2015) 006,arXiv:1502.08005 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    Noncommutativity of closed string zero modes,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Noncommutativity of closed string zero modes,”Phys. Rev.D96 no. 6, (2017) 066003,arXiv:1707.00312 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Intrinsic non-commutativity of closed string theory,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Intrinsic non-commutativity of closed string theory,”J. High Energ. Phys.09(2017) 060,arXiv:1706.03305 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    Modular Spacetime and Metastring Theory,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Modular Spacetime and Metastring Theory,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser.804 no. 1, (2017) 012032

    2017

  56. [56]

    Manifest non-locality in quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity,

    L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Manifest non-locality in quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.A34no. 28, (2019) 1941004

    2019

  57. [57]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Rohrlich,Quantum Paradoxes: Quantum Theory for the Perplexed. Wiley-VCH, 2005

    2005

  58. [58]

    The principle of relative locality

    G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, and L. Smolin, “Principle of relative locality,”Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 084010,arXiv:1101.0931 [hep-th]. 30

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Amelino-Camelia, L

    G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, and L. Smolin, “Relative locality: A deepening of the relativity principle,”Gen. Rel. Grav.43(2011) 2547–2553,arXiv:1106.0313 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    Theory of metaparticles,

    L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Theory of metaparticles,”Phys. Rev. D99 no. 6, (2019) 066011,arXiv:1812.10821 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Noncommutative Field Theory

    M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, “Noncommutative field theory,”Rev. Mod. Phys.73(2001) 977–1029, arXiv:hep-th/0106048 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  62. [62]

    Renormalisation of \phi^4-theory on noncommutative R^4 in the matrix base

    H. Grosse and R. Wulkenhaar, “Renormalization of phi**4 theory on noncommutative R**4 in the matrix base,”Commun. Math. Phys.256(2005) 305–374,arXiv:hep-th/0401128 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  63. [63]

    Non-Fermi Liquids, Strange Metals and Quasi-metaparticles,

    E. Barnes, J. J. Heremans, and D. Minic, “Non-Fermi Liquids, Strange Metals and Quasi-metaparticles,” arXiv:2111.10479 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    String Theory, the Dark Sector and the Hierarchy Problem,

    P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, and D. Minic, “String Theory, the Dark Sector and the Hierarchy Problem,”LHEP 2021(2021) 186,arXiv:2010.15610 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Mirror Symmetry, Born Geometry and String Theory,

    P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, and D. Minic, “Mirror Symmetry, Born Geometry and String Theory,” inNankai Symposium on Mathematical Dialogues: In celebration of S.-S. Chern’s 110th anniversary, Y.-H. He, M.-L. Ge, C.-M. Bai, J. Bao, and E. Hirst, eds. Springer Verlag, Singapore, Sept., 2022.arXiv:2111.14205 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Universal acceleration and fuzzy dark matter,

    D. Edmonds, J. Erlich, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, “Universal acceleration and fuzzy dark matter,” arXiv:2405.08744 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Double Field Theory,

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Double Field Theory,”J. High Energ. Phys.09(2009) 099,arXiv:0904.4664 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2009

  68. [68]

    Quark structure and octonions,

    M. G¨ unaydin and F. G¨ ursey, “Quark structure and octonions,”J. Math. Phys.14(1973) 1651–1667

    1973

  69. [69]

    Mastering the master field,

    R. Gopakumar and D. J. Gross, “Mastering the master field,”Nucl. Phys. B451(1995) 379–415, arXiv:hep-th/9411021

    work page arXiv 1995

  70. [70]

    Pascual jordan’s resolution of the conundrum of the wave-particle duality of light,

    A. Duncan and M. Janssen, “Pascual jordan’s resolution of the conundrum of the wave-particle duality of light,”arXiv:0709.3812 [physics.hist-ph].https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3812

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Echoes from Quantum Black Holes,

    Q. Wang, N. Oshita, and N. Afshordi, “Echoes from Quantum Black Holes,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 2, (2020) 024031,arXiv:1905.00446 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    On the emergent “quantum

    T. H¨ ubsch, D. Minic, K. Nikolic, and S. Pajevic, “On the emergent “quantum” theory in complex adaptive systems,”Ann. Phys.464(2024) 169641,arXiv:2310.14100 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Philosophical issues in quantum theory,

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Philosophical issues in quantum theory,” March 23, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-issues/. Last checked: April 11, 2026. 31

    2022