pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19621 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Efficient optimisation of multi-parameter quantum control protocols for strongly-coupled systems

Sion Meredith , Oliver Dudgeon , Wojciech Bukalski , Alistair J. Brash , Harry J.D. Miller , Thomas J. Elliott , Jake Iles-Smith
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum controlnon-Markovian noisequantum dotsautomatic differentiationadiabatic rapid passageSUPER protocoltwo-photon excitationoptimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Automatic differentiation paired with non-Markovian simulation optimizes multi-pulse control to raise exciton preparation fidelities in quantum dots above standard methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a gradient-based optimization framework that combines automatic differentiation with the uniTEMPO algorithm to directly tune multi-parameter quantum control protocols under strong non-Markovian noise. It applies the method to semiconductor quantum dots, refining Swing-UP of a Quantum Emitter and Floquet-engineered Two-Photon Excitation schemes and augmenting both with adiabatic rapid passage. The optimized protocols produce higher preparation fidelities than resonant pi-pulses or ordinary two-photon excitation, and the performance advantage increases as temperature rises. A reader would care because the approach targets practical constraints of real solid-state devices where environmental coupling limits control quality.

Core claim

The central claim is that automatic differentiation through the uniTEMPO algorithm enables efficient gradient-based optimization of complex multi-parameter objective functions for quantum control in the presence of strong non-Markovian noise, yielding enhanced fidelities for single- and bi-exciton generation when applied to SUPER and FTPE protocols augmented by adiabatic rapid passage in quantum dots, with these optimized schemes outperforming conventional resonant pi-pulses and two-photon excitation especially at elevated temperatures.

What carries the argument

The automatic differentiation of objective functions evaluated by the uniTEMPO algorithm, which computes gradients of non-Markovian quantum dynamics to enable direct optimization of pulse parameters.

If this is right

  • Higher fidelity preparation of single-exciton states through optimized SUPER protocols in quantum dots.
  • Improved bi-exciton generation via FTPE schemes enhanced by adiabatic rapid passage.
  • Consistent outperformance of resonant pi-pulses and two-photon excitation under the same noise conditions.
  • Increased thermal robustness, with the fidelity advantage over standard methods growing at higher temperatures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same automatic-differentiation approach could be applied to other solid-state systems whose dynamics are dominated by non-Markovian coupling.
  • The reduction in manual parameter tuning could shorten the experimental calibration time required to reach high-fidelity operation in quantum hardware.
  • The framework supplies a route to test whether multi-pulse adiabatic strategies remain advantageous when additional decoherence channels not captured by uniTEMPO become dominant.

Load-bearing premise

The uniTEMPO algorithm must accurately capture the non-Markovian noise and decoherence present in the physical quantum-dot device while the resulting optimized parameters remain experimentally realizable.

What would settle it

Direct experimental comparison of exciton preparation fidelities measured on a real quantum-dot device using the optimized SUPER and FTPE pulse parameters versus standard pi-pulses, performed at both low and elevated temperatures to check whether the predicted performance gap appears and widens with temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19621 by Alistair J. Brash, Harry J.D. Miller, Jake Iles-Smith, Oliver Dudgeon, Sion Meredith, Thomas J. Elliott, Wojciech Bukalski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Tensor network representation of the cost function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Excited state population as a function of pulse area [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Fidelity of single- and bi-exciton preparation as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Calculation of the final state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Discretisation of the open quantum evolution in terms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Benchmark comparing the AD method to the OQuPy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dependence of the final excited state population on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Achieving high-fidelity control in the presence of strong non-Markovian noise is critical for the optimization of emergent solid-state quantum devices. We present a highly efficient optimization framework that combines automatic differentiation with the non-Markovian uniTEMPO algorithm, enabling direct gradient-based optimization of complex objective functions. We apply this method to semiconductor quantum dots, optimizing multi-pulse excitation schemes: specifically Swing-UP of a Quantum EmmiteR (SUPER) and Floquet-engineered Two-Photon Excitation (FTPE) for single- and bi-exciton generation. Our approach yields high preparation fidelities within experimentally accessible parameter regimes. By integrating adiabatic rapid passage (ARP), we systematically enhance both SUPER and FTPE, demonstrating that these optimized protocols consistently outperform standard resonant pi-pulses and two-photon excitation. Notably, this performance gap widens at elevated temperatures, establishing the superior thermal robustness of our optimized multi-pulse strategies for real-world quantum hardware.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an optimization framework combining automatic differentiation with the non-Markovian uniTEMPO algorithm for gradient-based optimization of multi-parameter quantum control protocols under strong coupling. It applies this to semiconductor quantum dots, optimizing SUPER and FTPE multi-pulse schemes (enhanced by adiabatic rapid passage) for single- and bi-exciton generation, claiming higher fidelities than resonant pi-pulses or standard two-photon excitation, with the advantage increasing at elevated temperatures.

Significance. If the uniTEMPO-based simulations are accurate, the work provides a practical tool for designing thermally robust control protocols in solid-state systems with non-Markovian noise, potentially improving hardware performance in quantum-dot devices. The gradient-based approach for complex objectives is a methodological strength that could generalize beyond the specific protocols studied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results sections: The headline claims of high fidelities and a widening performance gap at elevated temperatures are presented without any quantitative values, tables of fidelities, error bars, or specific comparisons to resonant pulses; this makes it impossible to assess the magnitude or statistical significance of the reported advantages.
  2. [Methods] Methods (uniTEMPO modeling): The central claim of superior thermal robustness rests entirely on uniTEMPO faithfully reproducing phonon-induced non-Markovian noise and its temperature scaling in quantum dots. No direct benchmarking is reported against experimental observables such as temperature-dependent Rabi oscillations, Ramsey decay times, or exciton lifetimes in comparable devices, raising the risk that the simulated advantage is an artifact of the bath spectral density or truncation parameters rather than a hardware prediction.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Ensure all acronyms (SUPER, FTPE, ARP) are defined at first use and used consistently.
  2. [Figures] Figures comparing fidelities versus temperature should include uncertainty estimates or convergence checks from the optimization runs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We address the major comments below and have made revisions to improve the clarity and robustness of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results sections: The headline claims of high fidelities and a widening performance gap at elevated temperatures are presented without any quantitative values, tables of fidelities, error bars, or specific comparisons to resonant pulses; this makes it impossible to assess the magnitude or statistical significance of the reported advantages.

    Authors: We agree with this observation. The original abstract and results sections indeed lacked specific numerical values. In the revised manuscript, we have added quantitative fidelity values for the optimized SUPER and FTPE protocols, including direct comparisons to resonant pi-pulses and standard two-photon excitation at various temperatures. We have also included error bars and a table summarizing the fidelities to allow assessment of the performance gap and its temperature dependence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods (uniTEMPO modeling): The central claim of superior thermal robustness rests entirely on uniTEMPO faithfully reproducing phonon-induced non-Markovian noise and its temperature scaling in quantum dots. No direct benchmarking is reported against experimental observables such as temperature-dependent Rabi oscillations, Ramsey decay times, or exciton lifetimes in comparable devices, raising the risk that the simulated advantage is an artifact of the bath spectral density or truncation parameters rather than a hardware prediction.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern regarding the validation of the uniTEMPO algorithm. Our manuscript applies uniTEMPO as an established method for non-Markovian dynamics in quantum dots, with parameters chosen based on standard models for phonon baths in these systems. However, to strengthen the presentation, we have added references to previous works where uniTEMPO has been benchmarked against experimental data on temperature-dependent decoherence and Rabi oscillations in quantum dots. We also include a brief discussion on the choice of spectral density and truncation to mitigate concerns about artifacts. Direct new benchmarking experiments are outside the scope of this theoretical optimization study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Optimization framework yields numerical results without circular reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper describes a computational optimization procedure that combines automatic differentiation with the uniTEMPO non-Markovian simulator to tune multi-pulse parameters for SUPER and FTPE protocols in quantum dots. All reported fidelities and performance comparisons (including temperature dependence and ARP enhancements) are direct outputs of this numerical search within the model; no derivation chain equates a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by algebraic identity. Self-citations to uniTEMPO or related methods are present but serve only as the simulation engine rather than load-bearing justification for the superiority claims. The work therefore contains no self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or uniqueness-imported steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central performance claims rest on the assumption that the uniTEMPO simulator faithfully captures the physical non-Markovian dynamics and that the optimized parameters translate to experiment without additional unmodeled errors.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption uniTEMPO provides an accurate forward model of the non-Markovian open-system dynamics in the quantum-dot device.
    Invoked as the simulation engine whose gradients are used for optimization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5479 in / 1240 out tokens · 57563 ms · 2026-05-10T01:54:35.067928+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Glaser, U

    S. Glaser, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, C. Koch, W. K¨ ockenberger, R. Kosloff, I. Kuprov, B. Luy, S. Sher- mer, T. Schulte-Herbrueggen, D. Sugny, and F. Wilhelm, Training schr¨ odinger’s cat: quantum optimal control, The European Physical Journal D69(2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  3. [3]

    D. P. S. McCutcheon, N. S. Dattani, E. M. Gauger, B. W. Lovett, and A. Nazir, A general approach to quantum dynamics using a variational master equation: applica- tion to phonon-damped rabi rotations in quantum dots, Physical Review B84, 081305 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    D. P. S. McCutcheon and A. Nazir, Coherent and inco- herent dynamics in excitonic energy transfer: Correlated fluctuations and off-resonance effects, Phys. Rev. B83, 165101 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Michler, A

    P. Michler, A. Kiraz, C. Becher, W. V. Schoenfeld, P. Petroff, L. D. Zhang, E. Hu, and A. Imamoglu, A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device, Science290, 2282 (2000)

    2000

  6. [6]

    Press, S

    D. Press, S. G¨ otzinger, S. Reitzenstein, C. Hofmann, A. L¨ offler, M. Kamp, A. Forchel, and Y. Yamamoto, Pho- ton antibunching from a single quantum-dot-microcavity system in the strong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 117402 (2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    Moreau, I

    E. Moreau, I. Robert, L. Manin, V. Thierry-Mieg, J. M. G´ erard, and I. Abram, Quantum cascade of photons in semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 183601 (2001)

    2001

  8. [8]

    Akopian, N

    N. Akopian, N. H. Lindner, E. Poem, Y. Berlatzky, J. Avron, D. Gershoni, B. D. Gerardot, and P. M. Petroff, Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 130501 (2006)

    2006

  9. [9]

    Stevenson, R

    R. Stevenson, R. J. Young, P. Atkinson, K. Cooper, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, A semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs, Nature439, 179 (2006)

    2006

  10. [10]

    Dousse, J

    A. Dousse, J. Suffczynski, A. Beveratos, O. Krebs, A. Lemaitre, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, P. Voisin, and P. Senel- lart, Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs, Nature 466, 217 (2010)

    2010

  11. [11]

    T. K. Bracht, M. Cosacchi, T. Seidelmann, M. Cygorek, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, T. Heindel, and D. E. Reiter, Swing-up of quantum emitter population using detuned pulses, PRX Quantum2, 040354 (2021). 14

    2021

  12. [12]

    J. H. Quilter, A. J. Brash, F. Liu, M. Gl¨ assl, A. M. Barth, V. M. Axt, A. J. Ramsay, M. S. Skolnick, and A. M. Fox, Phonon-assisted population inversion of a single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot by pulsed laser ex- citation, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 137401 (2015)

    2015

  13. [13]

    Cosacchi, F

    M. Cosacchi, F. Ungar, M. Cygorek, A. Vagov, and V. M. Axt, Emission-frequency separated high quality single- photon sources enabled by phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 017403 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    A. M. Barth, S. L¨ uker, A. Vagov, D. E. Reiter, T. Kuhn, and V. M. Axt, Fast and selective phonon-assisted state preparation of a quantum dot by adiabatic undressing, Phys. Rev. B94, 045306 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    J.-Y. Yan, P. C. A. Hagen, H.-G. Babin, W. E. I. Sha, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, C.-Y. Jin, V. M. Axt, D.-W. Wang, M. Cygorek, and F. Liu, Robust entangled photon generation enabled by single-shot floquet driving (2025), arXiv:2504.02753 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Strathearn, P

    A. Strathearn, P. Kirton, D. Kilda, and et al., Efficient non-markovian quantum dynamics using time-evolving matrix product operators, Nature Communications9, 3322 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    M. R. Jørgensen and F. A. Pollock, Exploiting the causal tensor network structure of quantum processes to ef- ficiently simulate non-markovian path integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 240602 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    A. G. Baydin, B. A. Pearlmutter, A. A. Radul, and J. M. Siskind, Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey (2018), arXiv:1502.05767 [cs.SC]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Don’t unroll adjoint: Dif- ferentiating SSA-Form programs

    M. Innes, Don’t unroll adjoint: Differentiating ssa-form programs (2019), arXiv:1810.07951 [cs.PL]

    work page arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Link, H.-H

    V. Link, H.-H. Tu, and W. T. Strunz, Open quantum system dynamics from infinite tensor network contraction (2024), arXiv:2307.01802 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Kahlert, V

    F. Kahlert, V. Link, R. Hartmann, and W. T. Strunz, Simulating the Landau–Zener sweep in deeply sub-Ohmic environments, The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 184108 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Sonner, V

    M. Sonner, V. Link, and D. A. Abanin, Semi-group in- fluence matrices for non-equilibrium quantum impurity models (2025), 2502.00109

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    E. P. Butler, G. E. Fux, C. Ortega-Taberner, B. W. Lovett, J. Keeling, and P. R. Eastham, Optimizing per- formance of quantum operations with non-markovian de- coherence: The tortoise or the hare?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 060401 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Ortega-Taberner, E

    C. Ortega-Taberner, E. O’Neill, E. Butler, G. E. Fux, and P. R. Eastham, Unifying methods for optimal control in non-Markovian quantum systems via process tensors, The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 124119 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    T. H. Stievater, X. Li, D. G. Steel, D. Gammon, D. S. Katzer, D. Park, C. Piermarocchi, and L. J. Sham, Rabi oscillations of excitons in single quantum dots, Physical Review Letters87, 133603 (2001)

    2001

  26. [26]

    Kamada, H

    H. Kamada, H. Gotoh, J. Temmyo, T. Takagahara, and H. Ando, Exciton rabi oscillation in a single quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 246401 (2001)

    2001

  27. [27]

    Stufler, P

    S. Stufler, P. Machnikowski, P. Ester, M. Bichler, V. M. Axt, T. Kuhn, and A. Zrenner, Two-photon rabi oscilla- tions in a single in xga1−xAs/GaAs quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B73, 125304 (2006)

    2006

  28. [28]

    R. H. Byrd, P. Lu, J. Nocedal, and C. Zhu, A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimiza- tion, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing16, 1190 (1995)

    1995

  29. [29]

    Bollapragada, J

    R. Bollapragada, J. Nocedal, D. Mudigere, H.-J. Shi, and P. T. P. Tang, A progressive batching l-BFGS method for machine learning, inProceedings of the 35th Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 80, edited by J. Dy and A. Krause (PMLR, 2018) pp. 620–629

    2018

  30. [30]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization (2017), arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms

    S. Ruder, An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms (2017), arXiv:1609.04747 [cs.LG]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Zhang, Derivative-free global optimization algorithms: Population based methods and random search ap- proaches (2019), arXiv:1904.09368 [cs.LG]

    J. Zhang, Derivative-free global optimization algorithms: Population based methods and random search ap- proaches (2019), arXiv:1904.09368 [cs.LG]

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Storn and K

    R. Storn and K. Price, Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over con- tinuous spaces, Journal of Global Optimization11, 341 (1997)

    1997

  34. [34]

    Ortega-Taberner, E

    C. Ortega-Taberner, E. O’Neill, and P. Eastham, Quan- tum control of the environment in open quantum sys- tems enables rapid qubit reset (2026), arXiv:2603.09913 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Nazir and D

    A. Nazir and D. P. S. McCutcheon, Modelling exci- ton–phonon interactions in optically driven quantum dots, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter28, 103002 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    E. V. Denning, J. Iles-Smith, N. Gregersen, and J. Mork, Phonon effects in quantum dot single-photon sources, Opt. Mater. Express10, 222 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Kaldewey, S

    T. Kaldewey, S. L¨ uker, A. V. Kuhlmann, S. R. Valentin, J.-M. Chauveau, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, D. E. Reiter, T. Kuhn, and R. J. Warburton, Demonstrating the de- coupling regime of the electron-phonon interaction in a quantum dot using chirped optical excitation, Phys. Rev. B95, 241306 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    Simon, T

    C.-M. Simon, T. Belhadj, B. Chatel, T. Amand, P. Renucci, A. Lemaitre, O. Krebs, P. A. Dalgarno, R. J. Warburton, X. Marie, and B. Urbaszek, Robust quan- tum dot exciton generation via adiabatic passage with frequency-swept optical pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 166801 (2011)

    2011

  39. [39]

    Y. Wu, I. M. Piper, M. Ediger, P. Brereton, E. R. Schmidgall, P. R. Eastham, M. Hugues, M. Hopkinson, and R. T. Phillips, Population inversion in a single In- GaAs quantum dot using the method of adiabatic rapid passage, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 067401 (2011)

    2011

  40. [40]

    J. S. Melinger, S. R. Gandhi, A. Hariharan, J. X. Tull, and W. S. Warren, Generation of narrowband inversion with broadband laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 2000 (1992)

    2000

  41. [41]

    V. S. Malinovsky and J. L. Krause, General theory of population transfer by adiabatic rapid passage with in- tense, chirped laser pulses, European Physical Journal D 14, 147 (2001)

    2001

  42. [42]

    Karli, F

    Y. Karli, F. Kappe, V. Remesh, T. K. Bracht, J. M¨ unzberg, S. Covre da Silva, T. Seidelmann, V. M. Axt, A. Rastelli, D. E. Reiter, and G. Weihs, Super scheme in action: Experimental demonstration of red- detuned excitation of a quantum emitter, Nano Letters 22, 6567 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    Cygorek and E

    M. Cygorek and E. M. Gauger, Ace: A general-purpose non-markovian open quantum systems simulation toolkit based on process tensors, The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 074111 (2024). 15

    2024

  44. [44]

    Makri and D

    N. Makri and D. E. Makarov, Tensor propagator for it- erative quantum time evolution of reduced density ma- trices. i. theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics102, 4600 (1995)

    1995

  45. [45]

    Makri and D

    N. Makri and D. E. Makarov, Tensor propagator for iter- ative quantum time evolution of reduced density matri- ces. ii. numerical methodology, The Journal of Chemical Physics102, 4611 (1995)

    1995

  46. [46]

    Cygorek, J

    M. Cygorek, J. Keeling, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger, Sublinear scaling in non-markovian open quantum sys- tems simulations, Phys. Rev. X14, 011010 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    M. R. Jørgensen and F. A. Pollock, Exploiting the Causal Tensor Network Structure of Quantum Processes to Effi- ciently Simulate Non-Markovian Path Integrals, Physical Review Letters123, 240602 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    J. A. Gyamfi, Fundamentals of quantum mechanics in liouville space, European Journal of Physics41, 063002 (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    Vidal, Efficient Simulation of One-Dimensional Quan- tum Many-Body Systems, Physical Review Letters93, 040502 (2004)

    G. Vidal, Efficient Simulation of One-Dimensional Quan- tum Many-Body Systems, Physical Review Letters93, 040502 (2004)

    2004

  50. [50]

    Vidal, Classical Simulation of Infinite-Size Quantum Lattice Systems in One Spatial Dimension, Physical Re- view Letters98, 070201 (2007)

    G. Vidal, Classical Simulation of Infinite-Size Quantum Lattice Systems in One Spatial Dimension, Physical Re- view Letters98, 070201 (2007)

    2007

  51. [51]

    Strathearn, B

    A. Strathearn, B. W. Lovett, and P. Kirton, Efficient real- time path integrals for non-Markovian spin-boson mod- els, New Journal of Physics19, 093009 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    Aehle, J

    M. Aehle, J. Bl¨ uhdorn, M. Sagebaum, and N. R. Gauger, Forward-mode automatic differentiation of compiled pro- grams, ACM Trans. Math. Softw.51, 10.1145/3716309 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1145/3716309 2025

  53. [53]

    Aehle, J

    M. Aehle, J. Bl¨ uhdorn, M. Sagebaum, and N. R. Gauger, Reverse-mode automatic differentiation of compiled pro- grams (2022), arXiv:2212.13760 [cs.MS]

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Ideals of the multiview variety

    J. Bezanson, S. Karpinski, V. B. Shah, and A. Edelman, Julia: A Fast Dynamic Language for Technical Comput- ing (2012), arXiv:1209.5145 [cs]

    work page arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to nu- merical computing, SIAM Review59, 65 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671

    work page doi:10.1137/141000671 2017

  56. [56]

    Dalle and A

    G. Dalle and A. Hill, A common interface for automatic differentiation (2025), arXiv:2505.05542 [cs.MS]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    V. K. Dixit and C. Rackauckas, Optimization.jl: A uni- fied optimization package (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    P. K. Mogensen and A. N. Riseth, Optim: A mathe- matical optimization package for julia, Journal of Open Source Software3, 615 (2018)

    2018

  59. [59]

    Ortega-Taberner, E

    C. Ortega-Taberner, E. O’Neill, and P. Eastham, Qubit reset beyond the born-markov approximation: opti- mal driving to overcome polaron formation (2026), arXiv:2603.09914 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026