pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19830 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · physics.ins-det

Recognition: unknown

The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) Antarctic Balloon Payload

The GAPS Collaboration: Kazutaka Aoyama , Tsuguo Aramaki , Padrick Beggs , Mirko Boezio , Steven E. Boggs , Valter Bonvicini , Gabriel Bridges , Donatella Campana , Scott Candey , William W. Craig , Philip von Doetinchem , Conor Earley , Erik Everson , Lorenzo Fabris , Sydney Feldman , Hideyuki Fuke , Florian Gahbauer , Cory Gerrity , Luca Ghislotti , Charles J. Hailey , Takeru Hayashi , Akiko Kawachi , Kai Konoma , Masayoshi Kozai , Paolo Lazzaroni , Alexander Lowell , Massimo Manghisoni , Matteo Martucci , Keita Mizukoshi , Emiliano Mocchiutti , Brent Mochizuki , Kazuoki Munakata , Riccardo Munini , Shun Okazaki , Jerome Olson , Rene A. Ong , Giuseppe Osteria , Francesco Palma , Kaliro\"e Pappas , Kerstin Perez , Francesco Perfetto , Lodovico Ratti , Valerio Re , Elisa Riceputi , Brandon Roach , Field R. Rogers , Nathan Saffold , Suzuto Sakamoto , Pratiksha Sawant , Valentina Scotti , Yuki Shimizu , Roberta Sparvoli , Achim Stoessl , Arathi Suraj , Alessio Tiberio , Grace Tytus , Elena Vannuccini , Sarah Vickers , Luigi Volpicelli , Zhen Wu , Mengjiao Xiao , Jinghe Yang , Kelsey Yee , Tetsuya Yoshida , Gianluigi Zampa , Jiancheng Zeng , Jeffrey Zweerink

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM physics.ins-det
keywords GAPSballoon payloadcosmic-ray antinucleiexotic atomsilicon trackertime-of-flightdark matterAntarctic flight
0
0 comments X

The pith

The GAPS balloon payload identifies low-energy cosmic-ray antinuclei by tracking energy loss, exotic atom capture, X-ray emission, and annihilation products.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes the completed design, integration, and first flight of the GAPS Antarctic stratospheric balloon mission, which targets dark matter signatures in cosmic rays through detection of antiprotons, antideuterons, and antihelium nuclei below 0.25 GeV per nucleon. Its particle identification rests on measuring the slowing and capture of an incoming antinucleus into an exotic atom, followed by observation of the characteristic de-excitation X-rays and the nuclear annihilation products. These measurements are performed by a tracker of more than 1000 custom silicon strip detectors paired with a plastic scintillator time-of-flight system covering more than 40 square meters, together supplying velocity, energy loss, tracking, stopping power, and X-ray identification while respecting balloon mass and power limits. A multi-loop capillary heat pipe system cools the detectors. The assembled payload flew for 25 days in the 2025/26 NASA Antarctic campaign.

Core claim

The GAPS instrument realizes its particle identification by measuring energy loss along the track of an incoming antinucleus as it slows and is captured into an exotic atom, then detecting the de-excitation X-rays and nuclear annihilation products, using a silicon tracker and time-of-flight system to separate rare signals from abundant positive-nucleus backgrounds within balloon constraints.

What carries the argument

The Tracker of more than 1000 custom silicon strip detectors combined with the plastic scintillator time-of-flight system, which together supply velocity and energy resolution, stopping power, particle tracking, and X-ray identification.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of silicon-tracker energy-loss, TOF velocity, X-ray identification, and annihilation-product detection can reliably separate the rare antinucleus signals from the abundant positive-nucleus backgrounds under actual high-altitude flight conditions and background rates.

What would settle it

Flight data in which the observed X-ray energies or annihilation signatures fail to match the expected lines and multiplicities for captured antinuclei, or in which known particle species are misidentified at rates exceeding design predictions, would falsify the claimed identification capability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19830 by Achim Stoessl, Akiko Kawachi, Alessio Tiberio, Alexander Lowell, Arathi Suraj, Brandon Roach, Brent Mochizuki, Charles J. Hailey, Conor Earley, Cory Gerrity, Donatella Campana, Elena Vannuccini, Elisa Riceputi, Emiliano Mocchiutti, Erik Everson, Field R. Rogers, Florian Gahbauer, Francesco Palma, Francesco Perfetto, Gabriel Bridges, Gianluigi Zampa, Giuseppe Osteria, Grace Tytus, Hideyuki Fuke, Jeffrey Zweerink, Jerome Olson, Jiancheng Zeng, Jinghe Yang, Kai Konoma, Kaliro\"e Pappas, Kazuoki Munakata, Keita Mizukoshi, Kelsey Yee, Kerstin Perez, Lodovico Ratti, Lorenzo Fabris, Luca Ghislotti, Luigi Volpicelli, Masayoshi Kozai, Massimo Manghisoni, Matteo Martucci, Mengjiao Xiao, Mirko Boezio, Nathan Saffold, Padrick Beggs, Paolo Lazzaroni, Philip von Doetinchem, Pratiksha Sawant, Rene A. Ong, Riccardo Munini, Roberta Sparvoli, Sarah Vickers, Scott Candey, Shun Okazaki, Steven E. Boggs, Suzuto Sakamoto, Sydney Feldman, Takeru Hayashi, Tetsuya Yoshida, The GAPS Collaboration: Kazutaka Aoyama, Tsuguo Aramaki, Valentina Scotti, Valerio Re, Valter Bonvicini, William W. Craig, Yuki Shimizu, Zhen Wu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: GAPS design (left) and photo of the completed instrument (right). GAPS consists of a Tracker with > 1000 custom Si(Li) detectors, surrounded on all sides by a plastic scintillator TOF system. Supporting electronics and on-board computing are housed in the lower electronics bay. An antenna boom supported by the Top-frame supports antennas used for telemetry. A MCHP thermal system transports heat from the Tr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Reconstructed tracks and vertex in a simulated antideuteron event ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Diagram of the MHCP thermal system (top). 36 MHCP loops transport heat to the radiator (bottom-left) from the Tracker volume (bottom-right, shown with first three layers integrated). with a methacrylate adhesive. The radiator is coated with a 0.12 mm layer of silver-coated Teflon fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), which has low solar absorptance and a high infrared (IR) emissivity. The working fluid is … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diagram of the ground cooling system (GCS, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A Tracker module (left; top aluminized polypropylene window removed) contains four Si(Li) detectors. The Tracker structure (right) is pictured after integration of the final layer of 36 modules. module from the environment, save for two purge fittings, which are used to supply a continuous flow of nitrogen gas before flight. The aluminization of the windows creates a Faraday cage around each module [32]. T… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A tracker row illustrated with power and readout connections. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Overview of the GAPS trigger (blue), busy (orange), and data readout pathways (green). The Tracker electronics, which handle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Energy depositions (corrected for incident angle) from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A single TOF scintillator paddle with each end read out by six SiPMs ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: In the fully integrated TOF (left), the Umbrella and Cortina are visible (graduate student for scale). The TOF Cortina, which encircles the Cube, is constructed from four side panels and four corner panels. The TOF Cube encloses the Tracker with 98% hermeticity. For clarity, the engineering drawing (right) includes cutaways of the front Cube and Cortina panels and only three layers of the Tracker. persist… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: TOF readout board (top) and local trigger board (bot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of time-of-flight residuals between paddle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) is an Antarctic stratospheric balloon mission designed to provide unmatched sensitivity to low-energy (<0.25 GeV/n) cosmic-ray antiprotons, antideuterons, and antihelium nuclei as signatures of dark matter. The distinctive GAPS particle identification technique relies on measuring the energy loss along the track of an incoming antinucleus as it slows down and is captured into an exotic atom, and then detecting the de-excitation X-rays and the nuclear annihilation products. This measurement is realized using a Tracker composed of more than 1000 custom silicon strip detectors and a plastic scintillator time-of-flight (TOF) system instrumenting more than 40m$^2$. Together, these subsystems provide the velocity and energy resolution, stopping power, particle tracking, and X-ray identification necessary to distinguish rare antinucleus signals from the abundant positive-nucleus backgrounds, all within the constraints of a high-altitude mission. A multi-loop capillary heat pipe system has been developed to maintain the tracker operating temperature with significant mass and power savings over a conventional pump-based system. The first GAPS science payload flew for 25 days during the 2025/26 NASA Antarctic balloon campaign. We detail the design, integration, and commissioning of the payload prior to flight.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper describes the design, integration, and pre-flight commissioning of the GAPS Antarctic balloon payload for measuring low-energy cosmic-ray antinuclei. It details a silicon-strip tracker (>1000 detectors), a >40 m² plastic-scintillator TOF system, and a multi-loop capillary heat-pipe thermal control system that together enable the distinctive identification technique of tracking energy loss, exotic-atom formation, X-ray de-excitation, and annihilation products. The manuscript notes that the first science payload completed a 25-day flight in the 2025/26 NASA Antarctic campaign but focuses exclusively on hardware realization and ground testing.

Significance. If the described subsystems achieve the intended performance, the work is significant for documenting a novel, low-energy antinucleus detection method that could deliver unique constraints on dark-matter models via cosmic-ray antiprotons, antideuterons, and antihelium. The engineering solution for thermal management via capillary heat pipes is a concrete strength that reduces mass and power compared with conventional systems and may be adopted by other balloon payloads.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / particle identification technique] Abstract and particle-identification description: the central claim that the silicon-tracker + TOF + X-ray + annihilation combination 'provides the velocity and energy resolution, stopping power, particle tracking, and X-ray identification necessary to distinguish rare antinucleus signals from the abundant positive-nucleus backgrounds' is asserted without any quantitative support (dE/dx resolution, X-ray tagging efficiency, misidentification rate, or Monte Carlo results). This is load-bearing for the stated unmatched sensitivity.
  2. [Flight description and commissioning] Flight and commissioning section: although the 25-day flight is mentioned, the manuscript supplies no in-flight background rates at ~40 km, no combined identification efficiencies, and no validation data from the actual flight conditions, leaving the practical background-rejection performance unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Hardware description] The manuscript would benefit from a table summarizing key specifications (number of Si strips, TOF area, operating temperature, power budget) for quick reference.
  2. [Introduction] A brief reference to prior GAPS technical notes or test-beam results would help readers locate the quantitative performance studies that are cited only implicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript on the GAPS payload. The comments correctly identify areas where the presentation of the particle identification approach and the scope of the flight discussion can be strengthened. We respond to each major comment below and will incorporate revisions as indicated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / particle identification technique] Abstract and particle-identification description: the central claim that the silicon-tracker + TOF + X-ray + annihilation combination 'provides the velocity and energy resolution, stopping power, particle tracking, and X-ray identification necessary to distinguish rare antinucleus signals from the abundant positive-nucleus backgrounds' is asserted without any quantitative support (dE/dx resolution, X-ray tagging efficiency, misidentification rate, or Monte Carlo results). This is load-bearing for the stated unmatched sensitivity.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and introductory description would be strengthened by explicit quantitative support. Detailed performance figures for dE/dx resolution in the silicon tracker, X-ray tagging efficiency, misidentification rates, and Monte Carlo background-rejection studies are documented in our earlier GAPS technique papers. In the revised manuscript we will insert a concise summary paragraph (with references) that extracts the key quantitative results from ground commissioning data and simulations to directly underpin the abstract claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Flight description and commissioning] Flight and commissioning section: although the 25-day flight is mentioned, the manuscript supplies no in-flight background rates at ~40 km, no combined identification efficiencies, and no validation data from the actual flight conditions, leaving the practical background-rejection performance unverified.

    Authors: The manuscript is deliberately scoped to the design, integration, and pre-flight commissioning of the payload; the single sentence noting the completed 25-day flight supplies only contextual information that the instrument reached the field. In-flight background rates, combined efficiencies, and flight-condition validation data are not included because they lie outside the present paper’s focus and will appear in dedicated science-result publications. We will revise the introduction and abstract to state the paper’s scope explicitly and to remove any implication that flight performance metrics are provided here. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely descriptive instrument paper

full rationale

The GAPS paper is a technical description of payload hardware, integration, and commissioning with no equations, parameter fits, predictions, or mathematical derivations present. Claims about particle identification rely on stated design properties of the tracker and TOF subsystems rather than any reduction to fitted inputs or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the text. The manuscript therefore contains no steps that reduce by construction to their own inputs and is self-contained as an engineering report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The document is an instrumentation and mission-status paper; it introduces no new physical constants, fitted parameters, or postulated entities beyond the standard assumptions of particle detection and balloon flight.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5842 in / 1246 out tokens · 37222 ms · 2026-05-10T02:58:27.853876+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    arXiv:astro- ph/0109463

    Mori, K.et al.A novel antimatter detector based on X-ray deexcitation of exotic atoms.The Astro- physical Journal566, 604–616 (2002). arXiv:astro- ph/0109463

    work page arXiv 2002

  2. [2]

    Hailey, C. J. An indirect search for dark matter using antideuterons: the GAPS experiment.New Journal of Physics11, 105022 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    J.et al.Antideuteron based dark mat- ter search with GAPS: Current progress and future prospects.Advances in Space Research51, 290–296 (2013)

    Hailey, C. J.et al.Antideuteron based dark mat- ter search with GAPS: Current progress and future prospects.Advances in Space Research51, 290–296 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    Antideuterons as a Signature of Supersymmetric Dark Matter

    Donato, F., Fornengo, N. & Salati, P. Antideuterons as a signature of supersymmetric dark matter.Phys. Rev. D62, 043003 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/9904481

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  5. [5]

    & Maurin, D

    Donato, F., Fornengo, N. & Maurin, D. Antideuteron fluxes from dark matter annihilation in diffusion mod- els.Phys. Rev. D78, 043506 (2008). arXiv:0803.2640

    work page arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    & Di Mauro, M

    Donato, F., Korsmeier, M. & Di Mauro, M. Pre- scriptions on antiproton cross section data for precise theoretical antiproton flux predictions.Phys. Rev. D 96, 043007 (2017). arXiv:1704.03663

    work page arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    von Doetinchemet al., JCAP08, 035 (2020), arXiv:2002.04163 [astro-ph.HE]

    von Doetinchem, P.et al.Cosmic-ray antinuclei as messengers of new physics: status and outlook for the new decade.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020, 035–035 (2020). arXiv:2002.04163

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Aramaki, C

    Aramaki, T.et al.Antideuteron sensitivity for the GAPS experiment.Astroparticle Physics74, 6–13 (2016). arXiv:1506.02513

    work page arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    arXiv:1401.8245

    Aramaki, T.et al.Potential for precision measure- ment of low-energy antiprotons with GAPS for dark 17 matter and primordial black hole physics.Astropar- ticle Physics59, 12–17 (2014). arXiv:1401.8245

    work page arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Rogerset al.(GAPS), Astropart

    Rogers, F.et al.Sensitivity of the GAPS experiment to low-energy cosmic-ray antiprotons.Astroparticle Physics145, 102791 (2023). arXiv:2206.12991

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    arXiv:2012.05834

    Saffold, N.et al.Cosmic antihelium-3 nuclei sensi- tivity of the GAPS experiment.Astroparticle Physics 130, 102580 (2021). arXiv:2012.05834

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Sakai, K.et al.Search for antideuterons of cosmic origin using the bess-polar ii magnetic-rigidity spec- trometer.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 131001 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    J.et al.Accelerator testing of the general antiparticle spectrometer; a novel approach to indi- rect dark matter detection.JCAP2006, 007 (2006)

    Hailey, C. J.et al.Accelerator testing of the general antiparticle spectrometer; a novel approach to indi- rect dark matter detection.JCAP2006, 007 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0509587

    work page arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    Aramaki, et al., A Measurement of Atomic X-ray Yields in Exotic Atoms and Implications for an Antideuteron-Based Dark Matter Search, Astropart

    Aramaki, T.et al.A measurement of atomic X- ray yields in exotic atoms and implications for an antideuteron-based dark matter search.Astroparticle Physics49, 52–62 (2013). arXiv:1303.3871

    work page arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    arXiv:1307.3538

    von Doetinchem, P.et al.The flight of the GAPS prototype experiment.Astroparticle Physics54, 93– 109 (2014). arXiv:1307.3538

    work page arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Mognet, S. A. I.et al.The prototype GAPS (pGAPS) experiment.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A735, 24–38 (2014). arXiv:1303.1615

    work page arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    arXiv:1303.0380

    Fuke, H.et al.The pGAPS experiment: An en- gineering balloon flight of prototype GAPS.Ad- vances in Space Research53, 1432–1437 (2014). arXiv:1303.0380

    work page arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    & Miyazaki, Y

    Fuke, H., Okazaki, S., Ogawa, H. & Miyazaki, Y. Balloon Flight Demonstration of an Oscillating Heat Pipe.Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation6, 1740006–231 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Okazaki, S.et al.Balloon flight test of a low- temperature radiator.Journal of Evolving Space Ac- tivities2, 177 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Measurement of the cosmic-ray antiproton spectrum at solar minimum with a long-duration balloon flight over Antarctica

    Abe, K.et al.Measurement of the Cosmic-Ray An- tiproton Spectrum at Solar Minimum with a Long- Duration Balloon Flight over Antarctica.Physics Re- view Letters108, 051102 (2012). arXiv:1107.6000

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  21. [21]

    arXiv:astro- ph/0608697

    Picozza, P.et al.Pamela – a payload for antimatter matter exploration and light-nuclei astrophysics.As- troparticle Physics27, 296–315 (2007). arXiv:astro- ph/0608697

    work page arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Aguilar, M.et al.The alpha magnetic spectrometer (ams) on the international space station: Part ii — results from the first seven years.Physics Reports 894, 1–116 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    arXiv:2109.00753

    Munini, R.et al.The antinucleus annihilation recon- struction algorithm of the gaps experiment.Astropar- ticle Physics133, 102640 (2021). arXiv:2109.00753

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Miles, D. M. Great observatories maturation: a review of nasa astrophysics development through suborbital rocket and balloon programs (2025). arXiv:2507.07289

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Fuke, H.et al.Development of a cooling system for GAPS using oscillating heat pipe.Transac- tions JSASS Aerospace Technology, Japan14, 17–26 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    & Takahashi, N

    Okazaki, S., Fuke, H., Miyazaki, Y. & Takahashi, N. Meter-scale multi-loop capillary heat pipe.Applied Thermal Engineering141, 20–28 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    & Ogawa, H

    Fuke, H., Okazaki, S., Kondo, M., Kawachi, A. & Ogawa, H. Low-power, large-scale distributed hybrid thermal system to cool silicon detectors in the gaps instrument. In2019 IEEE Nuclear Science Sympo- sium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 1–3 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Fuke, H.et al.Operation concept of the gaps thermal control system.Journal of Evolving Space Activities 2, 156 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    arXiv:2212.12862

    Fuke, H.et al.Thermal control system to eas- ily cool the gaps balloon-borne instrument on the ground.Journal of Evolving Space Activities1, 2 (2023). arXiv:2212.12862

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    arXiv:1807.07912

    Perez, K.et al.Fabricationoflow-cost, large-areapro- totype Si(Li) detectors for the GAPS experiment.Nu- clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 905, 12–21 (2018). arXiv:1807.07912

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    arXiv:1906.00054

    Rogers, F.et al.Large-area Si(Li) detectors for X- ray spectrometry and particle tracking in the GAPS experiment.Journal of Instrumentation14, P10009 (2019). arXiv:1906.00054

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    arXiv:2305.00283

    Xiao, M.et al.Large-Scale Detector Testing for the GAPS Si(Li) Tracker.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science70, 2125–2133 (2023). arXiv:2305.00283

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    arXiv:2102.06168

    Saffold, N.et al.Passivation of Si(Li) detectors operated above cryogenic temperatures for space- based applications.Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research A997, 165015 (2021). arXiv:2102.06168

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Manghisoni, M.et al.A 32-channels readout asic for x-ray spectrometry and tracking in the gaps exper- iment.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science1–1 (2023). 18

    2023

  35. [35]

    Manghisoni, M.et al.Low-noise analog channel for the readout of the si(li) detector of the gaps exper- iment.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science1–1 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Manghisoni, M., Comotti, D., Gaioni, L., Ratti, L. & Re, V. Dynamic compression of the signal in a charge sensitive amplifier: From concept to design. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science62, 2318–2326 (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Manghisoni, M., Comotti, D., Gaioni, L., Ratti, L. & Re, V. Dynamic compression of the signal in a charge sensitive amplifier: Experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science65, 636–644 (2018)

    2018

  38. [38]

    & Pichler, B

    Stricker-Shaver, D., Ritt, S. & Pichler, B. J. Novel calibration method for switched capacitor arrays en- ables time measurements with sub-picosecond reso- lution.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science61, 3607–3617 (2014). arXiv:1405.4975

    work page arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Pordes, R.et al.The open science grid. InJ. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 78 of78, 012057 (2007)

    2007

  40. [40]

    In2009 WRI World Congress on Com- puter Science and Information Engineering, vol

    Sfiligoi, I.et al.The pilot way to grid resources using glideinwms. In2009 WRI World Congress on Com- puter Science and Information Engineering, vol. 2 of 2, 428–432 (2009)

    2009

  41. [41]

    OSG. Ospool. https://doi.org/10.21231/906P-4D78 (2006)

    work page doi:10.21231/906p-4d78 2006

  42. [42]

    2015 , bdsk-url-1 =

    OSG. Open science data federation. osg. https://doi.org/10.21231/0KVZ-VE57 (2015). 19

    work page doi:10.21231/0kvz-ve57 2015