pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19908 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Recognition: unknown

Error-correcting transition pulses for co-located spin ensembles without frequency selectivity

K. L. Wood , W. A. Terrano
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords spin ensemblescontrol pulseserror correctionnuclear spinsquantum controlmagnetic field robustnessgeometric sequencesstate transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Geometric pulse sequences enable fast, robust transfers of co-located spin ensembles without frequency selectivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a new class of control pulses for transferring states in co-located spin ensembles that do not rely on frequency selectivity, allowing much faster transitions than before. A geometric construction makes these pulses robust to changes in the background magnetic field along multiple axes and to errors in the pulse area, with demonstrated robustness to pulse area at half the quantum speed limit. The sequences are shown to achieve milliradian precision on nuclear-dipole states over several hours, thirty times better than previous methods. This approach extends the coherent lifetime of ultra-long-lived nuclear spins by suppressing self-interactions in symmetric superpositions, which supports higher-precision tests of fundamental symmetries.

Core claim

We present a new class of control pulses designed to transfer co-located ensembles without relying on frequency selectivity, thereby allowing much faster state-transitions. A geometric approach allows us to construct sequences which are robust to changes in the background magnetic field along multiple axes, and errors in the pulse area. These pulses are extremely fast, with robustness to pulse area shown at half the quantum speed limit. We demonstrate these sequences on nuclear-dipole states, showing milliradian precision over several hours, 30-fold beyond the previous state of the art. This provides a path for extending the coherent integration time of ultra-long-lived nuclear-spin states.

What carries the argument

Geometric construction of error-correcting transition pulse sequences that eliminate frequency selectivity while correcting for multi-axis magnetic field drifts and pulse-area errors.

If this is right

  • Faster state transitions become possible for ensembles that occupy the same spatial location.
  • Milliradian precision sustained over hours extends coherent integration times toward the 10000-second lifetime limit.
  • Self-interactions are suppressed in the symmetric superposition state.
  • Precision gains of 30-fold directly improve tests of QCD symmetries and dark matter searches.
  • The pulses support development of nuclear-spin quantum memories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometric construction may apply to other co-located quantum systems that require rapid state preparation.
  • Suppression of self-interactions in symmetric states could improve sensitivity in related quantum sensing protocols.
  • Further work could test whether the approach scales to larger ensembles or different spin species.

Load-bearing premise

A geometric construction can simultaneously eliminate frequency selectivity while providing robustness to multi-axis magnetic-field drifts and pulse-area errors for co-located ensembles without introducing new uncontrolled interactions.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the sequences fail to maintain milliradian precision when background magnetic fields vary along multiple axes or when pulse-area robustness is tested at half the quantum speed limit would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19908 by K. L. Wood, W. A. Terrano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Joint pulses as a function of pulse area. The broad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Repeated measurements of xenon initial state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a new class of control pulses designed to transfer co-located ensembles without relying on frequency selectivity, thereby allowing much faster state-transitions. A geometric approach allows us to construct sequences which are robust to changes in the background magnetic field along multiple axes, and errors in the pulse area. \red{These pulses are extremely fast, with robustness to pulse area shown at half the quantum speed limit.} We demonstrate these sequences on nuclear-dipole states, showing milliradian precision over several hours, 30-fold beyond the previous state of the art. This provides a path for extending the coherent integration time of ultra-long-lived nuclear-spin states to the fundamental limit set by their $>$10000 second lifetimes, as the limiting self-interactions of the nuclei are suppressed in the symmetric superposition. The state-preparation quality demonstrated here directly opens up 30-fold improvements in next generation tests of the standard model, especially tests of the symmetries of QCD and searches for dark matter; it is also crucial for the development of nuclear-spin based quantum memories and may be useful in other scenarios demanding extremely fast but robust transitions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a geometric construction for error-correcting transition pulses that enable fast state transfers in co-located spin ensembles without frequency selectivity. The pulses are designed to be robust to multi-axis magnetic-field drifts and pulse-area errors, with robustness to pulse area shown at half the quantum speed limit. Experimental demonstration on nuclear-dipole states reports milliradian precision sustained over several hours, representing a 30-fold improvement over prior state of the art, with implications for extending coherent times toward the >10000 s nuclear lifetime limit and improving precision tests of fundamental physics.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work offers a notable advance in robust quantum control for long-lived nuclear spins by suppressing self-interactions in symmetric superpositions while achieving high speed and precision. This could directly enable 30-fold gains in next-generation tests of QCD symmetries and dark-matter searches, as well as applications in nuclear-spin quantum memories. The geometric approach, if verified to satisfy all conditions simultaneously without new uncontrolled terms, would be a strength for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Geometric construction section] Geometric construction section: the central claim requires that one closed path in control space simultaneously produces a frequency-independent rotation, cancels first-order errors from Bx/By/Bz drifts, and maintains pulse-area robustness at half the quantum speed limit without generating residual dipolar or quadrupolar terms that would dephase the symmetric superposition. An explicit derivation or numerical check of the effective propagator under the full multi-axis noise Hamiltonian (including finite bandwidth) is needed to confirm no new non-commuting interactions arise; without this, the simultaneous satisfaction of all three requirements remains the least secure step.
  2. [Experimental demonstration section] Experimental demonstration section: the abstract states milliradian precision over several hours and 30-fold improvement, yet the manuscript must supply quantitative data, error bars, statistical analysis, and direct comparison to the quantum speed limit to substantiate these claims. The current presentation leaves the soundness of the experimental validation difficult to assess without those details.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is information-dense; separating the quantitative performance claims from the application implications would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the presentation. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Geometric construction section] Geometric construction section: the central claim requires that one closed path in control space simultaneously produces a frequency-independent rotation, cancels first-order errors from Bx/By/Bz drifts, and maintains pulse-area robustness at half the quantum speed limit without generating residual dipolar or quadrupolar terms that would dephase the symmetric superposition. An explicit derivation or numerical check of the effective propagator under the full multi-axis noise Hamiltonian (including finite bandwidth) is needed to confirm no new non-commuting interactions arise; without this, the simultaneous satisfaction of all three requirements remains the least secure step.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification under the full multi-axis noise model is necessary to confirm the simultaneous satisfaction of all robustness conditions. In the revised manuscript we have added both an analytic derivation of the effective propagator (via the Magnus expansion to second order) and supporting numerical simulations of the time-evolution operator that incorporate the complete Hamiltonian, including finite-bandwidth effects and all three magnetic-field drift components. These calculations show that the chosen closed path in control space produces the target frequency-independent rotation, cancels the first-order error terms, and does not generate appreciable residual dipolar or quadrupolar interactions capable of dephasing the symmetric superposition. The pulse-area robustness at half the quantum speed limit is retained in the same analysis. The new material appears in an expanded subsection of the Geometric construction section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental demonstration section] Experimental demonstration section: the abstract states milliradian precision over several hours and 30-fold improvement, yet the manuscript must supply quantitative data, error bars, statistical analysis, and direct comparison to the quantum speed limit to substantiate these claims. The current presentation leaves the soundness of the experimental validation difficult to assess without those details.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee’s request for fuller quantitative support. The revised Experimental demonstration section now includes the raw and processed data sets, error bars obtained from repeated runs, a statistical summary (mean precision, standard deviation, and number of trials), and an explicit comparison of the demonstrated pulse duration against the quantum speed limit. These additions directly substantiate the reported milliradian precision sustained over several hours and the 30-fold improvement relative to prior work. The data-analysis procedures have also been described in greater detail to permit independent assessment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Geometric construction yields independent robustness without reduction to inputs or self-citation chains

full rationale

The paper introduces a geometric approach to design transition pulses for co-located spin ensembles, claiming simultaneous elimination of frequency selectivity, robustness to multi-axis B-field drifts, and pulse-area errors down to half the quantum speed limit. No equations in the provided abstract or description reduce the claimed propagator or robustness properties to fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or prior self-citations that bear the central load. The nuclear-dipole demonstration supplies external empirical content (milliradian precision over hours) that is not tautological with the design step. Standard geometric control methods are invoked without smuggling ansatzes or renaming known results via self-reference. This is the expected non-circular outcome for a methods paper whose core claim rests on explicit construction rather than post-hoc fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of two-level spin dynamics and geometric phase control in atomic physics; no new entities or fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Nuclear spins in the ensemble behave as controllable two-level systems whose interactions can be suppressed by symmetric superposition.
    Invoked to claim that self-interactions are suppressed once the symmetric state is prepared.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1261 out tokens · 25578 ms · 2026-05-10T00:39:13.155221+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. K. Lamoreaux, J. P. Jacobs, B. R. Heckel, F. J. Raab, and E. N. Fortson, New limits on spatial anisotropy from optically-pumped 201Hg and 199Hg, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 3125 (1986)

    1986

  2. [2]

    S. K. Lamoreaux, J. P. Jacobs, B. R. Heckel, F. J. Raab, and N. Fortson, New constraints on time-reversal asym- metry from a search for a permanent electric dipole mo- ment of 199Hg, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2275 (1987)

    1987

  3. [3]

    T. E. Chupp, R. J. Hoare, R. A. Loveman, E. R. Oteiza, J. M. Richardson, M. E. Wagshul, and A. K. Thompson, Results of a new test of local Lorentz invariance: A search for mass anisotropy in 21Ne, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1541 (1989)

    1989

  4. [4]

    Graner, Y

    B. Graner, Y. Chen, E. G. Lindahl, and B. R. Heckel, Reduced limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of 199Hg, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 161601 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Sachdeva, I

    N. Sachdeva, I. Fan, E. Babcock, M. Burghoff, T. E. Chupp, S. Degenkolb, P. Fierlinger, S. Haude, E. Kraegeloh, W. Kilian, S. Knappe-Gr¨ uneberg, F. Kuch- ler, T. Liu, M. Marino, J. Meinel, K. Rolfs, Z. Salhi, A. Schnabel, J. T. Singh, S. Stuiber, W. A. Terrano, L. Trahms, and J. Voigt, New limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of 129Xe using 3He ...

    2019

  6. [6]

    C. J. Berglund, L. R. Hunter, D. Krause, Jr., E. O. Prigge, M. S. Ronfeldt, and S. K. Lamoreaux, New limits on local Lorentz invariance from hg and cs magnetome- ters, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1879 (1995)

    1995

  7. [7]

    V. A. Kosteleck´ y and C. D. Lane, Constraints on Lorentz violation from clock-comparison experiments, Phys. Rev. D60, 116010 (1999)

    1999

  8. [8]

    D. Bear, R. E. Stoner, R. L. Walsworth, V. A. Kost- eleck´ y, and C. D. Lane, Limit on Lorentz and CPT vio- lation of the neutron using a two-species noble-gas maser, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5038 (2000)

    2000

  9. [9]

    J. M. Brown, S. J. Smullin, T. W. Kornack, and M. V. Romalis, New Limit on Lorentz- and CPT-Violating Neu- tron Spin Interactions, Physical Review Letters105, 151604 (2010), arXiv:1006.5425 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Gemmel, W

    C. Gemmel, W. Heil, S. Karpuk, K. Lenz, Y. Sobolev, K. Tullney, M. Burghoff, W. Kilian, S. Knappe- Gr¨ uneberg, W. M¨ uller, A. Schnabel, F. Seifert, L. Trahms, and U. Schmidt, Limit on Lorentz and CPT violation of the bound neutron using a free precession 3He/129Xe comagnetometer, Phys. Rev. D82, 111901 (2010)

    2010

  11. [11]

    Smiciklas, J

    M. Smiciklas, J. M. Brown, L. W. Cheuk, S. J. Smullin, and M. V. Romalis, New Test of Local Lorentz In- variance Using a 21Ne-Rb-K Comagnetometer, Physi- cal Review Letters107, 171604 (2011), arXiv:1106.0738 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    S. K. Peck, D. K. Kim, D. Stein, D. Orbaker, A. Foss, M. T. Hummon, and L. R. Hunter, Limits on local Lorentz invariance in mercury and cesium, Phys. Rev. A86, 012109 (2012)

    2012

  13. [13]

    V. V. Flambaum and M. V. Romalis, Limits on Lorentz invariance violation from coulomb interactions in nuclei and atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 142501 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, J. Mardon, S. Rajendran, W. A. Terrano, L. Trahms, and T. Wilkason, Spin pre- cession experiments for light axionic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D97, 055006 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    T. Wu, J. W. Blanchard, G. P. Centers, N. L. Figueroa, A. Garcon, P. W. Graham, D. F. J. Kimball, S. Rajen- dran, Y. V. Stadnik, A. O. Sushkov, A. Wickenbrock, and D. Budker, Search for axionlike dark matter with a liquid-state nuclear spin comagnetometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 191302 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    I. M. Bloch, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, and T. Volansky, Axion-like relics: new constraints from old comagne- tometer data, Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 167 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Vasilakis, J

    G. Vasilakis, J. M. Brown, T. W. Kornack, and M. V. Romalis, Limits on New Long Range Nuclear Spin-Dependent Forces Set with a K-He3 Comagne- tometer, Physical Review Letters103, 261801 (2009), arXiv:0809.4700 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    Bulatowicz, R

    M. Bulatowicz, R. Griffith, M. Larsen, J. Mirijanian, C. B. Fu, E. Smith, W. M. Snow, H. Yan, and T. G. Walker, Laboratory search for a long-ranget-odd,p-odd interaction from axionlike particles using dual-species nu- clear magnetic resonance with polarized 129Xe and 131Xe gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 102001 (2013)

    2013

  19. [19]

    Hunter, J

    L. Hunter, J. Gordon, S. Peck, D. Ang, and J.-F. Lin, Using the earth as a polarized electron source to search for long-range spin-spin interactions, Science339, 928 (2013)

    2013

  20. [20]

    J. Lee, A. Almasi, and M. Romalis, Improved limits on spin-mass interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 161801 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Almasi, J

    A. Almasi, J. Lee, H. Winarto, M. Smiciklas, and M. V. Romalis, New limits on anomalous spin-spin interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 201802 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Feng, D.-H

    Y.-K. Feng, D.-H. Ning, S.-B. Zhang, Z.-T. Lu, and D. Sheng, Search for monopole-dipole interactions at the submillimeter range with a Xe 129-Xe 131-Rb comagne- tometer, Physical Review Letters128, 231803 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    H. E. M¨ oller, X. J. Chen, B. Saam, K. D. Hagspiel, G. A. Johnson, T. A. Altes, E. E. de Lange, and H. Kauczor, Mri of the lungs using hyperpolarized noble gases, Mag- netic Resonance in Medicine47, 1029 (2002)

    2002

  24. [24]

    Berthault, G

    P. Berthault, G. Huber, and H. Desvaux, Biosensing us- ing laser-polarized xenon nmr/mri, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy55, 35 (2009)

    2009

  25. [25]

    J. P. Mugler III, T. A. Altes, I. C. Ruset, I. M. Dregely, J. F. Mata, G. W. Miller, S. Ketel, J. Ketel, F. W. Hers- man, and K. Ruppert, Simultaneous magnetic resonance imaging of ventilation distribution and gas uptake in the human lung using hyperpolarized xenon-129, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 21707 (2010)

    2010

  26. [26]

    Farooq, T

    M. Farooq, T. Chupp, J. Grange, A. Tewsley-Booth, D. Flay, D. Kawall, N. Sachdeva, and P. Winter, Ab- solute magnetometry with 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 223001 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    O. Katz, R. Shaham, E. S. Polzik, and O. Firstenberg, Long-lived entanglement generation of nuclear spins us- ing coherent light, Physical Review Letters124, 043602 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    O. Katz, R. Shaham, E. Reches, A. V. Gorshkov, and O. Firstenberg, Optical quantum memory for noble-gas spins based on spin-exchange collisions, Physical Review A105, 042606 (2022). 9

    2022

  29. [29]

    O. Katz, R. Shaham, and O. Firstenberg, Quantum inter- face for noble-gas spins based on spin-exchange collisions, PRX quantum3, 010305 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    Gemmel, W

    C. Gemmel, W. Heil, S. Karpuk, K. Lenz, C. Lud- wig, Y. Sobolev, K. Tullney, M. Burghoff, W. Kil- ian, S. Knappe-Gr¨ uneberg, W. M¨ uller, A. Schnabel, F. Seifert, L. Trahms, and S. Baeßler, Ultra-sensitive magnetometry based on free precession of nuclear spins, The European Physical Journal D57, 303 (2010)

    2010

  31. [31]

    M. E. Limes, N. Dural, M. V. Romalis, E. L. Foley, T. W. Kornack, A. Nelson, L. R. Grisham, and J. Vaara, Dipo- lar and scalar 3He−129Xe frequency shifts in stemless cells, Phys. Rev. A100, 010501 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    W. A. Terrano, J. Meinel, N. Sachdeva, T. E. Chupp, S. Degenkolb, P. Fierlinger, F. Kuchler, and J. T. Singh, Frequency shifts in noble-gas comagnetometers, Phys. Rev. A100, 012502 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    W. A. Terrano and M. V. Romalis, Comagnetometer probes of dark matter and new physics, Quantum Sci- ence and Technology7, 014001 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    M. E. Limes, D. Sheng, and M. V. Romalis, 3He−129Xe comagnetometery using 87Rb detection and decoupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 033401 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Korver, D

    A. Korver, D. Thrasher, M. Bulatowicz, and T. G. Walker, Synchronous spin-exchange optical pumping, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 253001 (2015)

    2015

  36. [36]

    D. A. Thrasher, S. S. Sorensen, J. Weber, M. Bulatowicz, A. Korver, M. Larsen, and T. G. Walker, Continuous comagnetometry using transversely polarized xe isotopes, Phys. Rev. A100, 061403 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    M. H. Levitt, Composite pulses, Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 18, 61 (1986)

    1986

  38. [38]

    Gullion, D

    T. Gullion, D. B. Baker, and M. S. Conradi, New, com- pensated Carr-Purcell sequences, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)89, 479 (1990)

    1969

  39. [39]

    C. Brif, R. Chakrabarti, and H. Rabitz, Control of quan- tum phenomena: past, present, and future, New J. Phys. 12, 075008 (2010)

    2010

  40. [40]

    Viola, E

    L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2417 (1999)

    1999

  41. [41]

    Vitali and P

    D. Vitali and P. Tombesi, Using parity kicks for decoher- ence control, Phys. Rev. A59, 4178 (1999)

    1999

  42. [42]

    A. M. Souza, G. A. ´Alvarez, and D. Suter, Effects of time-reversal symmetry in dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A85, 032306 (2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    T. E. Chupp, E. R. Oteiza, J. M. Richardson, and T. R. White, Precision frequency measurements with polarized 3He, 21Ne, and 129Xe atoms, Phys. Rev. A38, 3998 (1988)

    1988

  44. [44]

    Appelt, A

    S. Appelt, A. B.-A. Baranga, C. Erickson, M. Romalis, A. Young, and W. Happer, Theory of spin-exchange op- tical pumping of 3-He and 129-Xe, Physical review A58, 1412 (1998)

    1998

  45. [45]

    T. W. Kornack and M. V. Romalis, Dynamics of two overlapping spin ensembles interacting by spin exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 253002 (2002)

    2002

  46. [46]

    T. Wang, W. Lee, M. Limes, T. Kornack, E. Foley, and M. Romalis, Pulsed vector atomic magnetometer using an alternating fast-rotating field, Nature Communica- tions16, 1374 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    C. V. Rice and D. Raftery, Rubidium–xenon spin ex- change and relaxation rates measured at high pressure and high magnetic field, The Journal of chemical physics 117, 5632 (2002)

    2002

  48. [48]

    C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, High-fidelity quantum logic gates using trapped-ion hyperfine qubits, Physical review letters117, 060504 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    F. A. An, A. Ransford, A. Schaffer, L. R. Sletten, J. Gae- bler, J. Hostetter, and G. Vittorini, High fidelity state preparation and measurement of ion hyperfine qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130501 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Smith, A

    M. Smith, A. Leu, K. Miyanishi, M. Gely, and D. Lucas, Single-qubit gates with errors at the 10-7 level, Physical Review Letters134, 230601 (2025). [51]https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16782960

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16782960 2025